summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t0091-bugreport.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-09-23tests: add a test mode for SANITIZE=leak, run it in CILibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+1
While git can be compiled with SANITIZE=leak, we have not run regression tests under that mode. Memory leaks have only been fixed as one-offs without structured regression testing. This change adds CI testing for it. We'll now build and small set of whitelisted t00*.sh tests under Linux with a new job called "linux-leaks". The CI target uses a new GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true test mode. When running in that mode, we'll assert that we were compiled with SANITIZE=leak. We'll then skip all tests, except those that we've opted-in by setting "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". A test setting "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" setting can in turn make use of the "SANITIZE_LEAK" prerequisite, should they wish to selectively skip tests even under "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". In the preceding commit we started doing this in "t0004-unwritable.sh" under SANITIZE=leak, now it'll combine nicely with "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". This is how tests that don't set "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" will be skipped under GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true: $ GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true ./t0001-init.sh 1..0 # SKIP skip all tests in t0001 under SANITIZE=leak, TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK not set The intent is to add more TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true annotations as follow-up change, but let's start small to begin with. In ci/run-build-and-tests.sh we make use of the default "*" case to run "make test" without any GIT_TEST_* modes. SANITIZE=leak is known to fail in combination with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=true in t0016-oidmap.sh, and we're likely to have other such failures in various GIT_TEST_* modes. Let's focus on getting the base tests passing, we can expand coverage to GIT_TEST_* modes later. It would also be possible to implement a more lightweight version of this by only relying on setting "LSAN_OPTIONS". See <YS9OT/pn5rRK9cGB@coredump.intra.peff.net>[1] and <YS9ZIDpANfsh7N+S@coredump.intra.peff.net>[2] for a discussion of that. I've opted for this approach of adding a GIT_TEST_* mode instead because it's consistent with how we handle other special test modes. Being able to add a "!SANITIZE_LEAK" prerequisite and calling "test_done" early if it isn't satisfied also means that we can more incrementally add regression tests without being forced to fix widespread and hard-to-fix leaks at the same time. We have tests that do simple checking of some tool we're interested in, but later on in the script might be stressing trace2, or common sources of leaks like "git log" in combination with the tool (e.g. the commit-graph tests). To be clear having a prerequisite could also be accomplished by using "LSAN_OPTIONS" directly. On the topic of "LSAN_OPTIONS": It would be nice to have a mode to aggregate all failures in our various scripts, see [2] for a start at doing that which sets "log_path" in "LSAN_OPTIONS". I've punted on that for now, it can be added later. As of writing this we've got major regressions between master..seen, i.e. the t000*.sh tests and more fixed since 31f9acf9ce2 (Merge branch 'ah/plugleaks', 2021-08-04) have regressed recently. See the discussion at <87czsv2idy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>[3] about the lack of this sort of test mode, and 0e5bba53af (add UNLEAK annotation for reducing leak false positives, 2017-09-08) for the initial addition of SANITIZE=leak. See also 09595ab381 (Merge branch 'jk/leak-checkers', 2017-09-19), 7782066f67 (Merge branch 'jk/apache-lsan', 2019-05-19) and the recent 936e58851a (Merge branch 'ah/plugleaks', 2021-05-07) for some of the past history of "one-off" SANITIZE=leak (and more) fixes. As noted in [5] we can't support this on OSX yet until Clang 14 is released, at that point we'll probably want to resurrect that "osx-leaks" job. 1. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerLeakSanitizer 2. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YS9OT%2Fpn5rRK9cGB@coredump.intra.peff.net/ 3. https://lore.kernel.org/git/87czsv2idy.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ 4. https://lore.kernel.org/git/YS9ZIDpANfsh7N+S@coredump.intra.peff.net/ 5. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210916035603.76369-1-carenas@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-07bugreport: collect list of populated hooksLibravatar Emily Shaffer1-0/+15
Occasionally a failure a user is seeing may be related to a specific hook which is being run, perhaps without the user realizing. While the contents of hooks can be sensitive - containing user data or process information specific to the user's organization - simply knowing that a hook is being run at a certain stage can help us to understand whether something is going wrong. Without a definitive list of hook names within the code, we compile our own list from the documentation. This is likely prone to bitrot, but designing a single source of truth for acceptable hooks is too much overhead for this small change to the bugreport tool. Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-16bugreport: add tool to generate debugging infoLibravatar Emily Shaffer1-0/+61
Teach Git how to prompt the user for a good bug report: reproduction steps, expected behavior, and actual behavior. Later, Git can learn how to collect some diagnostic information from the repository. If users can send us a well-written bug report which contains diagnostic information we would otherwise need to ask the user for, we can reduce the number of question-and-answer round trips between the reporter and the Git contributor. Users may also wish to send a report like this to their local "Git expert" if they have put their repository into a state they are confused by. Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>