summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t0030-stripspace.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-03-13grep portability fix: don't use "-e" or "-q"Libravatar Jeff King1-17/+17
System V versions of grep (such as Solaris /usr/bin/grep) don't understand either of these options. git's usage of "grep -e pattern" fell into one of two categories: 1. equivalent to "grep pattern". -e is only useful here if the pattern begins with a "-", but all of the patterns are hardcoded and do not begin with a dash. 2. stripping comments and blank lines with grep -v -e "^$" -e "^#" We can fortunately do this in the affirmative as grep '^[^#]' Uses of "-q" can be replaced with redirection to /dev/null. In many tests, however, "grep -q" is used as "if this string is in the expected output, we are OK". In this case, it is fine to just remove the "-q" entirely; it simply makes the "verbose" mode of the test slightly more verbose. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01Sane use of test_expect_failureLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-20/+20
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-26Teach "git stripspace" the --strip-comments optionLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+5
With --strip-comments (or short -s), git stripspace now removes lines beginning with a '#', too. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-11t0030: Add tests with consecutive text lines and others with spaces added.Libravatar Carlos Rica1-0/+51
Previous tests only had paragraphs of one line. This commit adds some tests to check when many consecutive text lines are given. Also, it adds tests for checking that many lines between paragraphs are correctly reduced to one when there are tabs and spaces in those lines. Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-11t0030: Remove repeated instructions and add missing &&Libravatar Carlos Rica1-24/+13
Moved some tests to another test_expect_success block. Many tests now reuse the same "expect" file. Also replacing many printf "" >expect with one >expect instruction. Added missing && which concatenated tests in some test_expect_success blocks. Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-94/+94
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-26Add test script for git-stripspace.Libravatar Carlos Rica1-0/+355
These tests check some features that git-stripspace already has and those that it should manage well: Removing trailing spaces from lines, removing blank lines at the beginning and end, unifying multiple lines between paragraphs, doing the correct when there is no newline at the last line, etc. It seems that the implementation needs to save the whole line in memory to be able to manage correctly long lines with text and spaces conveniently distribuited on them. Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>