summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t0000-basic.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-03-24test-lib: have --immediate emit valid TAP on failureLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+13
Change the "--immediate" option so that it emits valid TAP on failure. Before this it would omit the required plan at the end, e.g. under SANITIZE=leak we'd show a "No plan found in TAP output" error from "prove": $ prove t0006-date.sh :: --immediate t0006-date.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/22 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t0006-date.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 1) Failed test: 22 Non-zero exit status: 1 Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output Files=1, Tests=22, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.18 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.27 CPU) Result: FAIL Now we'll emit output that doesn't result in TAP parsing failures: $ prove t0006-date.sh :: --immediate t0006-date.sh .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/22 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t0006-date.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 22 Failed: 1) Failed test: 22 Non-zero exit status: 1 Files=1, Tests=22, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.26 CPU) Result: FAIL Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-03-12t0001-t0028: avoid pipes with Git on LHSLibravatar Shubham Mishra1-4/+6
Pipes ignore error codes of LHS command and thus we should not use them with Git in tests. As an alternative, use a 'tmp' file to write the Git output so we can test the exit code. Signed-off-by: Shubham Mishra <shivam828787@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-10-13Merge branch 'ab/lib-subtest'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-330/+118
Updates to the tests in t0000 to test the test framework. * ab/lib-subtest: test-lib tests: get rid of copy/pasted mock test code test-lib tests: assert 1 exit code, not non-zero test-lib tests: refactor common part of check_sub_test_lib_test*() test-lib tests: avoid subshell for "test_cmp" for readability test-lib tests: don't provide a description for the sub-tests test-lib tests: split up "write and run" into two functions test-lib tests: move "run_sub_test" to a new lib-subtest.sh
2021-09-22test-lib tests: get rid of copy/pasted mock test codeLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-168/+60
Now that we've split up the write_sub_test_lib_test*() and run_sub_test_lib_test*() functions let's fix those tests in t0000-basic.sh that were verbosely copy/pasting earlier tests. That we caught all of them was asserted with a follow-up change that's not part of this series[1], we might add such a duplication check at some later time, but for now let's just one-off remove the duplicate boilerplate. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/patch-v3-6.9-bc79b29f3c-20210805T103237Z-avarab@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-22test-lib tests: don't provide a description for the sub-testsLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-80/+62
Change the $test_description provided for the generated subtests to be constant, since the only purpose of having it is that test-lib.sh will barf if it isn't supplied. The other purpose of having it was to effectively split up the test description between the argument to test_expect_success and the argument to "write_and_run_sub_test_lib_test". Let's only use one of the two. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-22test-lib tests: split up "write and run" into two functionsLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-37/+37
Refactor the function to write and run tests of the test-lib.sh output into two functions. When this was added back in 565b6fa87bb (tests: refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib, 2012-12-16) there was no reason to do this, but since we started supporting test arguments in 517cd55fd51 (test-lib: self-test that --verbose works, 2013-06-23) we've started to write out duplicate tests simply to test different arguments, now we'll be able to re-use them. This change doesn't consolidate any of those tests yet, it just makes it possible to do so. All the changes in t0000-basic.sh are a simple search-replacement. Since the _run_sub_test_lib_test_common() function doesn't handle running the test anymore we can do away with the sub-shell, which was used to scope an "unset" and "export" shell variables. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-16t0000: avoid masking git exit value through pipesLibravatar Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón1-11/+12
9af0b8dbe2 (t0000-basic: more commit-tree tests., 2006-04-26) adds tests for commit-tree that mask the return exit from git as described in a378fee5b07 (Documentation: add shell guidelines, 2018-10-05). Fix the tests, to avoid pipes by using a temporary file instead. Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-21test-lib tests: move "run_sub_test" to a new lib-subtest.shLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-87/+1
Move the "check_sub_test_lib_test()" and its sister functions to a new lib-subtest.sh. In the future (not in this series) I'd like to test test-lib's output in a more targeted and smaller test, and I'll need these functions to do that. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-20t0000: fix test if run with TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORYLibravatar Patrick Steinhardt1-2/+5
Testcases in t0000 are quite special given that they many of them run nested testcases to verify that testing functionality itself works as expected. These nested testcases are realized by writing a new ad-hoc test script which again sources test-lib.sh, where the new script is created in a nested subdirectory located beneath the current trash directory. We then execute the new test script with the nested subdirectory as current working directory and explicitly re-export TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY to point to that directory. While this works as expected in the general case, it falls apart when the developer has TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY explicitly defined either via the environment or via config.mak and runs "make test". In that case, test-lib.sh will clobber the value that we've just carefully set up to instead contain what the developer has defined. As a result, the TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY continues to point at the root output directory, not at the nested one. This issue causes breakage in the 'test_atexit is run' test case: the nested test case writes files into "../../", which is assumed to be the parent's trash directory. But because TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY already points to to the root output directory, we instead end up writing those files outside of the output directory. The parent test case will then try to check whether those files still exist in its own trash directory, which thus must fail now. Fix the issue by adding a new TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY_OVERRIDE variable. If set, then we'll always override the TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY with its value after sourcing GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-19t0000: clear GIT_SKIP_TESTS before running sub-testsLibravatar Jeff King1-10/+29
In t0000, we run several fake "sub-test" suites to verify the behavior of the test suite. But because we don't clear the parent environment completely, the sub-tests can be fooled by variables meant for the parent. For example: GIT_SKIP_TESTS=t1234 ./t0000-basic.sh fails when a sub-test expects its fake t1234 to actually run. This particular pattern is unlikely in practice; we're running a single script, and there is no t1234 in the real test suite anyway (not yet, at least). A more real-world example is: GIT_SKIP_TESTS=t[^0]* make test to run only the t0* tests. The fix is conceptually simple: we should clear the GIT_SKIP_TESTS variable when running the sub-tests, because its contents (if any) will be meant for the main test suite. This is easy to do centrally in our sub-test helper. But there's a catch: some of our tests do set GIT_SKIP_TESTS intentionally to test the feature. We need to allow them to continue to set it, but clear it for all the other tests. And the sub-test helper can't tell if the GIT_SKIP_TESTS it sees is from a test or not. We can handle this by adding a new option to the helper to let callers specify the skip list. I considered adding a more general "--eval" option to let callers set up the env for the sub-test however they like. That would cover this case and possible future ones. But the quoting gets awkward for the callers (since we're now 2 layers deep in evals!), so I went with the simpler more specific solution. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-05-11test-lib tests: remove dead GIT_TEST_FRAMEWORK_SELFTEST variableLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-4/+0
Stop setting the GIT_TEST_FRAMEWORK_SELFTEST variable. This was originally needed back in 4231d1ba99 (t0000: do not get self-test disrupted by environment warnings, 2018-09-20). It hasn't been needed since I deleted the relevant code in test-lib.sh in c0eedbc009 (test-lib: remove check_var_migration, 2021-02-09), I just didn't notice that it was set here. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-10tests: remove most uses of C_LOCALE_OUTPUTLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
As a follow-up to d162b25f956 (tests: remove support for GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove those uses of the now always true C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequisite from those tests which declare it as an argument to test_expect_{success,failure}. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28t0000: consistently use single quotes for outer testsLibravatar Jeff King1-190/+190
When we use the sub-test helpers, we end up defining one shell snippet inside another shell snippet. So if we use single-quotes for the outer snippet, we have to use double-quotes within the inner snippet (it's included as here-doc within the outer snippet, but using a single quote would end the outer snippet early). Or vice versa we can use double quotes for the outer snippet, but then single quotes in the inner. We have some of each in the script, and neither is wrong. But it would be nice to be consistent unless there is a good reason not to. Using single quotes for the outer script is preferable, because it requires less metacharacter quoting overall. For example, in: test_expect_success 'outer' ' run_sub_test_lib_test ... <<-\EOF echo $foo && test_expect_success "inner" " echo \$bar " EOF ' we need only quote inside "inner", but not inside "outer" or the here-doc. Whereas if we flip them, we have to quote in both places: test_expect_success 'outer' " run_sub_test_lib_test ... <<-\EOF echo \$foo && test_expect_success 'inner' ' echo \$bar ' EOF " The exception is when we need a literal single-quote in an expected output here-doc. There we can either use outer double-quotes, or just use ${SQ} within the doc. I chose the latter for consistency (within this test, but also with other test scripts that face the same problem). There is one other interesting case, which is some tests that do: test_expect_success ... " do_something --run='"'!3'"' " This is rather confusing to read, but is correct. The outer script sees '!3' in single-quotes, as does the eval'd snippet. This is perhaps being overly cautious. In many interactive shells, an exclamation triggers history expansion even inside double quotes, but that is not generally true in non-interactive shells. There's some conflicting information here. Commit 784ce03d55 (t4216: avoid unnecessary subshell in test_bloom_filters_not_used, 2020-05-19) reports it as a problem with OpenBSD 6.7's /bin/sh. However, we have many instances in this script of prereqs like !LAZY_TRUE, which haven't been a problem. I left them un-escaped here to test out this theory. It's much nicer if we can not worry about this as a portability issue, so it's worth knowing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28t0000: run cleaning test inside sub-testLibravatar Jeff King1-8/+17
Our check of test_when_finished is done directly in the main script, and if we failed to clean, we complain and exit immediately. It's nicer to signal a test failure here, for a few reasons: - this gives better output to the user when run under a TAP harness like "prove" - constency; it's the only test left in the file that behaves this way - half of its "if" conditional is nonsense anyway; it picked up a reference to GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS_INTERNAL in dfe1a17df9 (tests: add a special setup where prerequisites fail, 2019-05-13) along with its neighbors, even though it has nothing to do with that flag We could actually do this without a sub-test at all, and just put our two tests (one to do cleanup, and one to check that it happened) in the main script. But doing it in a subtest is conceptually cleaner (from the perspective of the main test script, we are checking only one thing), and it remains consistent with the "cleanup when failing" test directly after it, which has to happen in a sub-test (to avoid the main script complaining of the failed test). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28t0000: run prereq tests inside sub-testLibravatar Jeff King1-80/+69
We test the behavior of prerequisites in t0000 by setting up fake ones in the main test script, trying to run some tests, and then seeing if those tests impacted the environment correctly. If they didn't, then we write a message and manually call exit. Instead, let's push these down into a sub-test, like many of the other tests covering the framework itself. This has a few advantages: - it does not pollute the test output with mention of skipped tests (that we know are uninteresting -- the point of the test was to see that these are skipped). - when running in a TAP harness, we get a useful test failure message (whereas when the script exits early, a tool like "prove" simply says "Dubious, test returned 1"). - we do not have to worry about different test environments, such as when GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS_INTERNAL is set. Our sub-test helpers already give us a known environment. - the tests themselves are a bit easier to read, as we can just check the test-framework output to see what happened (and get the usual test_cmp diff if it failed) A few notes on the implementation: - we could do one sub-test per each individual test_expect_success. I broke it up here into a few logical groups, as I think this makes it more readable - the original tests modified environment variables inside the test bodies. Instead, I've used "true" as the body of a test we expect to run and "false" otherwise. Technically this does not confirm that the body of the "true" test actually ran. We are trusting the framework output to believe that it truly ran, which is sufficient for these tests. And I think the end result is much simpler to follow. - the nested_prereq test uses a few bare "test -f" calls; I converted these to our usual test_path_is_* helpers while moving the code around. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28t0000: keep clean-up tests togetherLibravatar Jeff King1-11/+11
We check that test_when_finished cleans up after a test, and that it runs even after a failure. Those two were originally adjacent, but got split apart by the new test added in 477dcaddb6 (tests: do not let lazy prereqs inside `test_expect_*` turn off tracing, 2020-03-26), and then further by more lazy-prereq tests. Let's move them back together. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-25Merge branch 'sg/tests-prereq'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+21
A lazily defined test prerequisite can now be defined in terms of another lazily defined test prerequisite. * sg/tests-prereq: tests: fix description of 'test_set_prereq' tests: make sure nested lazy prereqs work reliably
2020-11-18tests: make sure nested lazy prereqs work reliablyLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-0/+21
Some test prereqs depend on other prereqs, so in a couple of cases we have nested prereqs that look something like this: test_lazy_prereq FOO ' test_have_prereq BAR && check-foo ' This can be problematic, because lazy prereqs are evaluated in the '$TRASH_DIRECTORY/prereq-test-dir' directory, which is the same for every prereq, and which is automatically removed after the prereq has been evaluated. So if the inner prereq (BAR above) is a lazy prereq that hasn't been evaluated yet, then after its evaluation the 'prereq-test-dir' shared with the outer prereq will be removed. Consequently, 'check-foo' will find itself in a non-existing directory, and won't be able to create/access any files in its cwd, which could result in an unfulfilled outer prereq. Luckily, this doesn't affect any of our current nested prereqs, either because the inner prereq is not a lazy prereq (e.g. MINGW, CYGWIN or PERL), or because the outer prereq happens to be checked without touching any paths in its cwd (GPGSM and RFC1991 in 'lib-gpg.sh'). So to prevent nested prereqs from interfering with each other let's evaluate each prereq in its own dedicated directory by appending the prereq's name to the directory name, e.g. 'prereq-test-dir-SYMLINKS'. In the test we check not only that the prereq test dir is still there, but also that the inner prereq can't mess with the outer prereq's files. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-02Merge branch 'en/test-selector'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-22/+31
Our test scripts can be told to run only individual pieces while skipping others with the "--run=..." option; they were taught to take a substring of test title, in addition to numbers, to name the test pieces to run. * en/test-selector: test-lib: reduce verbosity of skipped tests t6006, t6012: adjust tests to use 'setup' instead of synonyms test-lib: allow selecting tests by substring/glob with --run
2020-10-18test-lib: allow selecting tests by substring/glob with --runLibravatar Elijah Newren1-22/+31
Many of our test scripts have several "setup" tests. It's a lot easier to say ./t0050-filesystem.sh --run=setup,9 in order to run all the setup tests as well as test #9, than it is to track down what all the setup tests are and enter all their numbers in the list. Also, I often find myself wanting to run just one or a couple tests from the test file, but I don't know the numbering of any of the tests -- to get it I either have to first run the whole test file (or start counting by hand or figure out some other clever but non-obvious tricks). It's really convenient to be able to just look at the test description(s) and then run ./t6416-recursive-corner-cases.sh --run=symlink or ./t6402-merge-rename.sh --run='setup,unnecessary update' Add such an ability to test selection which relies on merely matching against the test description. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-18t0000: use test_path_is_file instead of "test -f"Libravatar Caleb Tillman1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Caleb Tillman <caleb.tillman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-part-3'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+11
The final leg of SHA-256 transition. * bc/sha-256-part-3: (39 commits) t: remove test_oid_init in tests docs: add documentation for extensions.objectFormat ci: run tests with SHA-256 t: make SHA1 prerequisite depend on default hash t: allow testing different hash algorithms via environment t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithm repository: enable SHA-256 support by default setup: add support for reading extensions.objectformat bundle: add new version for use with SHA-256 builtin/verify-pack: implement an --object-format option http-fetch: set up git directory before parsing pack hashes t0410: mark test with SHA1 prerequisite t5308: make test work with SHA-256 t9700: make hash size independent t9500: ensure that algorithm info is preserved in config t9350: make hash size independent t9301: make hash size independent t9300: use $ZERO_OID instead of hard-coded object ID t9300: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t8011: make hash size independent ...
2020-07-30t: remove test_oid_init in testsLibravatar brian m. carlson1-4/+0
Now that we call test_oid_init in the setup for all test scripts, there's no point in calling it individually. Remove all of the places where we've done so to help keep tests tidy. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-30t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithmLibravatar brian m. carlson1-0/+11
In some tests, we have data files which are written with a particular hash algorithm. Instead of keeping two copies of the test files, we can keep one, and translate the value on the fly. In order to do so, we'll need to read both the source algorithm and the current algorithm, so add an optional flag to the test_oid helper that lets us look up a value for a specified hash algorithm. This should not cause any conflicts with existing tests, since key arguments to test_oid are allowed to contains only shell identifier characters. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-07test-lib-functions: restrict test_must_fail usageLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+18
In previous commits, we removed the usage of test_must_fail() for most commands except for a set of pre-approved commands. Since that's done, only allow test_must_fail() to run those pre-approved commands. Obviously, we should allow `git`. We allow `__git*` as some completion functions return an error code that comes from a git invocation. It's good to avoid using test_must_fail unnecessarily but it wouldn't hurt to err on the side of caution when we're potentially wrapping a git command (like in these cases). We also allow `test-tool` and `test-svn-fe` because these are helper commands that are written by us and we want to catch their failure. Finally, we allow `test_terminal` because `test_terminal` just wraps around git commands. Also, we cannot rewrite `test_must_fail test_terminal` as `test_terminal test_must_fail` because test_must_fail() is a shell function and as a result, it cannot be invoked from the test-terminal Perl script. We opted to explicitly list the above tools instead of using a catch-all such as `test[-_]*` because we want to be as restrictive as possible so that in the future, someone would not accidentally introduce an unrelated usage of test_must_fail() on an "unapproved" command. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-08Merge branch 'cb/t0000-use-the-configured-shell'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+2
The basic test did not honor $TEST_SHELL_PATH setting, which has been corrected. * cb/t0000-use-the-configured-shell: t/t0000-basic: make sure subtests also use TEST_SHELL_PATH
2020-05-07t/t0000-basic: make sure subtests also use TEST_SHELL_PATHLibravatar Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón1-5/+2
3f824e91c8 (t/Makefile: introduce TEST_SHELL_PATH, 2017-12-08) allows for setting a shell for running the tests, but the generated subtests weren't updated. Correct that and while at it update it to use write_script. Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-28t0000: disable GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS in sub-testsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+1
The test added by 477dcaddb6 (tests: do not let lazy prereqs inside `test_expect_*` turn off tracing, 2020-03-26) runs a sub-test script that traces a test with a lazy prereq, like: test_have_prereq LAZY && echo trace That won't work if GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS is set in the environment, because our have_prereq will report failure, and we won't run the echo at all. We could work around this by avoiding the &&-chain, but we can fix this and any future tests at once by unsetting that variable for our sub-tests. These are meant to be controlled environments where we test the test-suite itself; the outer test snippet should be in charge of the sub-test environment, not whatever mode the user happens to be running in. Reported-by: Son Luong Ngoc <sluongng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-26tests: do not let lazy prereqs inside `test_expect_*` turn off tracingLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+13
The `test_expect_*` functions use `test_eval_` and so does `test_run_lazy_prereq_`. If tracing is enabled via the `-x` option, `test_eval_` turns on tracing while evaluating the code block, and turns it off directly after it. This is unwanted for nested invocations. One somewhat surprising example of this is when running a test that calls `test_i18ngrep`: that function requires the `C_LOCALE_OUTPUT` prereq, and that prereq is a lazy one, so it is evaluated via `test_eval_`, the command tracing is turned off, and the test case continues to run _without tracing the commands_. Another somewhat surprising example is when one lazy prereq depends on another lazy prereq: the former will call `test_have_prereq` with the latter one, which in turn calls `test_eval_` and -- you guessed it -- tracing (if enabled) will be turned off _before_ returning to evaluating the other lazy prereq. As we will introduce just such a scenario with the GPG, GPGSM and RFC1991 prereqs, let's fix that by introducing a variable that keeps track of the current trace level: nested `test_eval_` calls will increment and then decrement the level, and only when it reaches 0, the tracing will _actually_ be turned off. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-05Merge branch 'dl/test-must-fail-fixes'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+7
Test clean-up. * dl/test-must-fail-fixes: t1507: inline full_name() t1507: run commands within test_expect_success t1507: stop losing return codes of git commands t1501: remove use of `test_might_fail cp` t1409: use test_path_is_missing() t1409: let sed open its own input file t1307: reorder `nongit test_must_fail` t1306: convert `test_might_fail rm` to `rm -f` t0020: use ! check_packed_refs_marked t0020: don't use `test_must_fail has_cr` t0003: don't use `test_must_fail attr_check` t0003: use test_must_be_empty() t0003: use named parameters in attr_check() t0000: replace test_must_fail with run_sub_test_lib_test_err() t/lib-git-p4: use test_path_is_missing()
2019-12-20t0000: replace test_must_fail with run_sub_test_lib_test_err()Libravatar Denton Liu1-7/+7
The test_must_fail function should only be used for git commands since we should assume that external commands work sanely. We use test_must_fail to test run_sub_test_lib_test() but that function does not invoke any git commands internally. Even better, we have a function that's exactly meant to be used when we expect to have a failing test suite: run_sub_test_lib_test_err()! Replace `test_must_fail run_sub_test_lib_test` with `run_sub_test_lib_test_err`. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-05Merge branch 'sg/test-bool-env'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+34
Recently we have declared that GIT_TEST_* variables take the usual boolean values (it used to be that some used "non-empty means true" and taking GIT_TEST_VAR=YesPlease as true); make sure we notice and fail when non-bool strings are given to these variables. * sg/test-bool-env: t5608-clone-2gb.sh: turn GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB into a bool tests: add 'test_bool_env' to catch non-bool GIT_TEST_* values
2019-12-05Merge branch 'dl/t5520-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+8
Test cleanup. * dl/t5520-cleanup: t5520: replace `! git` with `test_must_fail git` t5520: remove redundant lines in test cases t5520: replace $(cat ...) comparison with test_cmp t5520: don't put git in upstream of pipe t5520: test single-line files by git with test_cmp t5520: use test_cmp_rev where possible t5520: replace test -{n,z} with test-lib functions t5520: use test_line_count where possible t5520: remove spaces after redirect operator t5520: replace test -f with test-lib functions t5520: let sed open its own input t5520: use sq for test case names t5520: improve test style t: teach test_cmp_rev to accept ! for not-equals t0000: test multiple local assignment
2019-11-23tests: add 'test_bool_env' to catch non-bool GIT_TEST_* valuesLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-0/+34
Since 3b072c577b (tests: replace test_tristate with "git env--helper", 2019-06-21) we get the normalized bool values of various GIT_TEST_* environment variables via 'git env--helper'. Now, while the 'git env--helper' command itself does catch invalid values in the environment variable or in the given --default and exits with error (exit code 128 or 129, respectively), it's invoked in conditions like 'if ! git env--helper ...', which means that all invalid bool values are interpreted the same as the ordinary 'false' (exit code 1). This has led to inadvertently skipped httpd tests in our CI builds for a couple of weeks, see 3960290675 (ci: restore running httpd tests, 2019-09-06). Let's be more careful about what the test suite accepts as bool values in GIT_TEST_* environment variables, and error out loud and clear on invalid values instead of simply skipping tests. Add the 'test_bool_env' helper function to encapsulate the invocation of 'git env--helper' and the verification of its exit code, and replace all invocations of that command in our test framework and test suite with a call to this new helper (except in 't0017-env-helper.sh', of course). $ GIT_TEST_GIT_DAEMON=YesPlease ./t5570-git-daemon.sh fatal: bad numeric config value 'YesPlease' for 'GIT_TEST_GIT_DAEMON': invalid unit error: test_bool_env requires bool values both for $GIT_TEST_GIT_DAEMON and for the default fallback Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-21t0000: test multiple local assignmentLibravatar Denton Liu1-7/+8
According to POSIX enhancement request '0000767: Add built-in "local"'[1], dash only allows one variable in a local definition; it permits assignment though it doesn't document that clearly. however, this isn't true since t0000 still passes with this patch applied on dash 0.5.10.2. Needless to say, since `local` isn't POSIX standardized, it is not exactly clear what `local` entails on different versions of different shells. We currently already have many instances of multiple local assignments in our codebase. Ensure that this is actually supported by explicitly testing that it is sane. [1]: http://austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=767 Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Fix spelling errors in comments of testcasesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-15Merge branch 'dl/t0000-skip-test-test'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+38
test update. * dl/t0000-skip-test-test: t0000: cover GIT_SKIP_TESTS blindspots
2019-10-09t0000: cover GIT_SKIP_TESTS blindspotsLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+38
Currently, the tests for GIT_SKIP_TESTS do not cover the situation where we skip an entire test suite. The tests also do not cover the situation where we have GIT_SKIP_TESTS defined but the test suite does not match. Add two test cases so we cover this blindspot. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-22Merge branch 'sg/show-failed-test-names'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-10/+10
The first line of verbose output from each test piece now carries the test name and number to help scanning with eyeballs. * sg/show-failed-test-names: tests: show the test name and number at the start of verbose output t0000-basic: use realistic test script names in the verbose tests
2019-08-09Merge branch 'bc/hash-independent-tests-part-4'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+6
Test fix. * bc/hash-independent-tests-part-4: t0000: reword comments for "local" test t: decrease nesting in test_oid_to_path
2019-08-08t0000: reword comments for "local" testLibravatar Jeff King1-8/+6
Commit 01d3a526ad (t0000: check whether the shell supports the "local" keyword, 2017-10-26) added a test to gather data on whether people run the test suite with shells that don't support "local". After almost two years, nobody has complained, and several other uses have cropped up in test-lib-functions.sh. Let's declare it acceptable to use. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05tests: show the test name and number at the start of verbose outputLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-4/+4
The verbose output of every test looks something like this: expecting success: echo content >file && git add file && git commit -m "add file" [master (root-commit) d1fbfbd] add file Author: A U Thor <author@example.com> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 file ok 1 - commit works i.e. first an "expecting success" (or "checking known breakage") line followed by the commands to be executed, then the output of those comamnds, and finally an "ok"/"not ok" line containing the test name. Note that the test's name is only shown at the very end. With '-x' tracing enabled and/or in longer tests the verbose output might be several screenfulls long, making it harder than necessary to find where the output of the test with a given name starts (especially when the outputs to different file descriptors are racing, and the "expecting success"/command block arrives earlier than the "ok" line of the previous test). Print the test name at the start of the test's verbose output, i.e. at the end of the "expecting success" and "checking known breakage" lines, to make the start of a particular test a bit easier to recognize. Also print the test script and test case numbers, to help those poor souls who regularly have to scan through the combined verbose output of several test scripts. So the dummy test above would start like this: expecting success of 9999.1 'commit works': echo content >file && [...] Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05t0000-basic: use realistic test script names in the verbose testsLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-6/+6
Our test scripts are named something like 't1234-command.sh', but the script names used in 't0000-basic.sh' don't follow this naming convention. Normally this doesn't matter, because the test scripts themselves don't care how they are called. However, the next patch will start to include the test number in the test's verbose output, so the test script's name will matter in the two tests checking the verbose output. Update the tests 'test --verbose' and 'test --verbose-only' to follow out test script naming convention. Leave the other tests in 't0000' unchanged: changing the names of their test scripts would be only pointless code churn. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-21tests: make GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS a booleanLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-5/+5
Change the GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS variable from being "non-empty?" to being a more standard boolean variable. I recently added the variable in dfe1a17df9 ("tests: add a special setup where prerequisites fail", 2019-05-13), having to add another "non-empty?" special-case is what prompted me to write the "git env--helper" utility being used here. Converting this one is a bit tricky since we use it so early and frequently in the guts of the test code itself, so let's set a GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS_INTERNAL which can be tested with the old "test -n" for the purposes of the shell code, and change the user-exposed and documented GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS variable to a boolean. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-14tests: add a special setup where prerequisites failLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-5/+5
As discussed in [1] there's a regression in the "pu" branch now because a new test implicitly assumed that a previous test guarded by a prerequisite had been run. Add a "GIT_TEST_FAIL_PREREQS" special test setup where we'll skip (nearly) all tests guarded by prerequisites, allowing us to easily emulate those platform where we don't run these tests. As noted in the documentation I'm adding I'm whitelisting the SYMLINKS prerequisite for now. A lot of tests started failing if we lied about not supporting symlinks. It's also unlikely that we'll have a failing test due to a hard dependency on symlinks without that being the obvious cause, so for now it's not worth the effort to make it work. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1905131531000.44@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-14test-lib: introduce 'test_atexit'Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+18
When running Apache, 'git daemon', or p4d, we want to kill them at the end of the test script, otherwise a leftover daemon process will keep its port open indefinitely, and thus will interfere with subsequent executions of the same test script. So far, we stop these daemon processes "manually", i.e.: - by registering functions or commands in the trap on EXIT to stop the daemon while preserving the last seen exit code before the trap (to deal with a failure when run with '--immediate' or with interrupts by ctrl-C), - and by invoking these functions/commands last thing before 'test_done' (and sometimes restoring the test framework's default trap on EXIT, to prevent the daemons from being killed twice). On one hand, we do this inconsistently, e.g. 'git p4' tests invoke different functions in the trap on EXIT and in the last test before 'test_done', and they neither restore the test framework's default trap on EXIT nor preserve the last seen exit code. On the other hand, this is error prone, because, as shown in a previous patch in this series, any output from the cleanup commands in the trap on EXIT can prevent a proper cleanup when a test script run with '--verbose-log' and certain shells, notably 'dash', is interrupted. Let's introduce 'test_atexit', which is loosely modeled after 'test_when_finished', but has a broader scope: rather than running the commands after the current test case, run them when the test script finishes, and also run them when the test is interrupted, or exits early in case of a failure while the '--immediate' option is in effect. When running the cleanup commands at the end of a successful test, then they will be run in 'test_done' before it removes the trash directory, i.e. the cleanup commands will still be able to access any pidfiles or socket files in there. When running the cleanup commands after an interrupt or failure with '--immediate', then they will be run in the trap on EXIT. In both cases they will be run in 'test_eval_', i.e. both standard error and output of all cleanup commands will go where they should according to the '-v' or '--verbose-log' options, and thus won't cause any troubles when interrupting a test script run with '--verbose-log'. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-09i18n: make GETTEXT_POISON a runtime optionLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Change the GETTEXT_POISON compile-time + runtime GIT_GETTEXT_POISON test parameter to only be a GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=<non-empty?> runtime parameter, to be consistent with other parameters documented in "Running tests with special setups" in t/README. When I added GETTEXT_POISON in bb946bba76 ("i18n: add GETTEXT_POISON to simulate unfriendly translator", 2011-02-22) I was concerned with ensuring that the _() function would get constant folded if NO_GETTEXT was defined, and likewise that GETTEXT_POISON would be compiled out unless it was defined. But as the benchmark in my [1] shows doing a one-off runtime getenv("GIT_TEST_[...]") is trivial, and since GETTEXT_POISON was originally added the GIT_TEST_* env variables have become the common idiom for turning on special test setups. So change GETTEXT_POISON to work the same way. Now the GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease compile-time option is gone, and running the tests with GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=[YesPlease|] can be toggled on/off without recompiling. This allows for conditionally amending tests to test with/without poison, similar to what 859fdc0c3c ("commit-graph: define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH", 2018-08-29) did for GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH. Do some of that, now we e.g. always run the t0205-gettext-poison.sh test. I did enough there to remove the GETTEXT_POISON prerequisite, but its inverse C_LOCALE_OUTPUT is still around, and surely some tests using it can be converted to e.g. always set GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=. Notes on the implementation: * We still compile a dedicated GETTEXT_POISON build in Travis CI. Perhaps this should be revisited and integrated into the "linux-gcc" build, see ae59a4e44f ("travis: run tests with GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX", 2018-01-07) for prior art in that area. Then again maybe not, see [2]. * We now skip a test in t0000-basic.sh under GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease that wasn't skipped before. This test relies on C locale output, but due to an edge case in how the previous implementation of GETTEXT_POISON worked (reading it from GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS) wasn't enabling poison correctly. Now it does, and needs to be skipped. * The getenv() function is not reentrant, so out of paranoia about code of the form: printf(_("%s"), getenv("some-env")); call use_gettext_poison() in our early setup in git_setup_gettext() so we populate the "poison_requested" variable in a codepath that's won't suffer from that race condition. * We error out in the Makefile if you're still saying GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease to prompt users to change their invocation. * We should not print out poisoned messages during the test initialization itself to keep it more readable, so the test library hides the variable if set in $GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON_ORIG during setup. See [3]. See also [4] for more on the motivation behind this patch, and the history of the GETTEXT_POISON facility. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/871s8gd32p.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ 2. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181102163725.GY30222@szeder.dev/ 3. https://public-inbox.org/git/20181022202241.18629-2-szeder.dev@gmail.com/ 4. https://public-inbox.org/git/878t2pd6yu.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19Merge branch 'bp/rename-test-env-var'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
Some environment variables that control the runtime options of Git used during tests are getting renamed for consistency. * bp/rename-test-env-var: t0000: do not get self-test disrupted by environment warnings preload-index: update GIT_FORCE_PRELOAD_TEST support read-cache: update TEST_GIT_INDEX_VERSION support fsmonitor: update GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR support preload-index: use git_env_bool() not getenv() for customization t/README: correct spelling of "uncommon"
2018-10-16Merge branch 'md/test-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Various test scripts have been updated for style and also correct handling of exit status of various commands. * md/test-cleanup: tests: order arguments to git-rev-list properly t9109: don't swallow Git errors upstream of pipes tests: don't swallow Git errors upstream of pipes t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed arguments tests: standardize pipe placement Documentation: add shell guidelines t/README: reformat Do, Don't, Keep in mind lists
2018-10-07t/*: fix ordering of expected/observed argumentsLibravatar Matthew DeVore1-1/+1
Fix various places where the ordering was obviously wrong, meaning it was easy to find with grep. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>