| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
"git checkout --recurse-submodules" did not quite work with a
submodule that itself has submodules.
* sb/checkout-recurse-submodules:
submodule: properly recurse for read-tree and checkout
submodule: avoid auto-discovery in new working tree manipulator code
submodule_move_head: reuse child_process structure for futher commands
|
|
We forgot to prepare the submodule env, which is only a problem for
nested submodules. See 2e5d6503bd (ls-files: fix recurse-submodules
with nested submodules, 2017-04-13) for further explanation.
To come up with a proper test for this, we'd need to look at nested
submodules just as in that given commit. It turns out we're lucky
and these tests already exist, but are marked as failing. We need
to pass `--recurse-submodules` to read-tree additionally to make
these tests pass. Passing that flag alone would not make the tests
pass, such that this covers testing for the bug fix of the submodule
env as well.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Early on in submodule_move_head just after the check if the submodule is
initialized, we need to check if the submodule is populated correctly.
If the submodule is initialized but doesn't look like it is populated,
this is a red flag and can indicate multiple sorts of failures:
(1) The submodule may be recorded at an object name, that is missing.
(2) The submodule '.git' file link may be broken and it is not pointing
at a repository.
In both cases we want to complain to the user in the non-forced mode,
and in the forced mode ignoring the old state and just moving the
submodule into its new state with a fixed '.git' file link.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This was an oversight when working on the working tree modifying commands
recursing into submodules.
To test for uninitialized submodules, introduce another submodule
"uninitialized_sub". Adding it via `submodule add` will activate the
submodule in the preparation area (in create_lib_submodule_repo we
setup all the things in submodule_update_repo), but the later tests
will use a new testing repo that clones the preparation repo
in which the new submodule is not initialized.
By adding it to the branch "add_sub1", which is the starting point of
all other branches, we have wide coverage.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A new known failure mode is introduced[1], which is actually not
a failure but a feature in read-tree. Unlike checkout for which
the recursive submodule tests were originally written, read-tree does
warn about ignored untracked files that would be overwritten.
For the sake of keeping the test library for submodules generic, just
mark the test as a failure.
[1] KNOWN_FAILURE_SUBMODULE_OVERWRITE_IGNORED_UNTRACKED
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This exposes a flag to recurse into submodules
in builtin/checkout making use of the code implemented
in prior patches.
A new failure mode is introduced in the submodule
update library, as the directory/submodule conflict
is not solved in prior patches.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Currently lib-submodule-update.sh provides 2 functions
test_submodule_switch and test_submodule_forced_switch that are used by a
variety of tests to ensure that submodules behave as expected. The current
expected behavior is that submodules are not touched at all (see
42639d2317a for the exact setup).
In the future we want to teach all these commands to recurse
into submodules. To do that, we'll add two testing functions to
submodule-update-lib.sh: test_submodule_switch_recursing and
test_submodule_forced_switch_recursing.
These two functions behave in analogy to the already existing functions
just with a different expectation on submodule behavior. The submodule
in the working tree is expected to be updated to the recorded submodule
version. The behavior is analogous to e.g. the behavior of files in a
nested directory in the working tree, where a change to the working tree
handles any arising directory/file conflicts just fine.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Cleaning up code by generalising it.
Currently the mailing list discusses yet again how
to migrate away from sha1.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Adding the repository itself as a submodule does not make sense in the
real world. In our test suite we used to do that out of convenience in
some tests as the current repository has easiest access for setting up
'just a submodule'.
However this doesn't quite test the real world, so let's do not follow
this pattern any further and actually create an independent repository
that we can use as a submodule.
When using './.' as the remote the superproject and submodule share the
same objects, such that testing if a given sha1 is a valid commit works
in either repository. As running commands in an unpopulated submodule
fall back to the superproject, this happens in `reset_work_tree_to`
to determine if we need to populate the submodule. Fix this bug by
checking in the actual remote now.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Redraw the ASCII art describing the setup using more space, such that
it is easier to understand. The leaf commits are now ordered the same
way the actual code is ordered.
Add empty lines to the setup code separating each of the leaf commits,
each starting with a "checkout -b".
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We write
(cd <dir> && git <cmd>)
to avoid
cd <dir> && git <cmd> && cd ..
that allows a breakage in one part of the test script to leave the
entire test process in an unexpected place. Modern version of Git
allows us to do this more concisely with "git -C <dir> <cmd>".
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test that the stash apply command updates the work tree as expected for
changes which don't result in conflicts. To make that work add a helper
function that uses read-tree to apply the changes of the target commit
to the work tree, then stashes these changes and at last applies that
stash.
Implement the KNOWN_FAILURE_STASH_DOES_IGNORE_SUBMODULE_CHANGES switch
and reuse two other already present switches to expect the known
failure that stash does ignore submodule changes.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test that the cherry-pick command updates the work tree as expected (for
submodule changes which don't result in conflicts).
Set KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_ATTEMPTS_TO_MERGE_REMOVED_SUBMODULE_FILES
and KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_DOESNT_CREATE_EMPTY_SUBMODULE_DIR to
document that cherry-pick has the same --no-ff known failures merge has.
Implement the KNOWN_FAILURE_CHERRY_PICK_SEES_EMPTY_COMMIT switch to expect
the known failure that while cherry picking just a SHA-1 update for an
ignored submodule the commit incorrectly fails with "The previous
cherry-pick is now empty, possibly due to conflict resolution.".
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test that the merge command updates the work tree as expected (for
submodule changes which don't result in conflicts) when used without
arguments or with the '--ff', '--ff-only' and '--no-ff' flag.
Implement the KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_DOESNT_CREATE_EMPTY_SUBMODULE_DIR
switch to expect the known failure that --no-ff merges do not create the
empty submodule directory.
The KNOWN_FAILURE_NOFF_MERGE_ATTEMPTS_TO_MERGE_REMOVED_SUBMODULE_FILES
switch is also implemented to expect the known failure that --no-ff
merges attempt to merge the new files in the former submodule directory
with those of the removed submodule.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add this test library to simplify covering all combinations of submodule
update scenarios without having to add those to a test of each work tree
manipulating command over and over again.
The functions test_submodule_switch() and test_submodule_forced_switch()
are intended to be called from a test script with a single argument. This
argument is either a work tree manipulating command (including any command
line options) or a function (when more than a single git command is needed
to switch work trees from the current HEAD to another commit). This
command (or function) is passed a target branch as argument. The two new
functions check that each submodule transition is handled as expected,
which currently means that submodule work trees are not affected until
"git submodule update" is called. The "forced" variant is for commands
using their '-f' or '--hard' option and expects them to overwrite local
modifications as a result. Each of these two functions contains 14
tests_expect_* calls.
Calling one of these test functions the first time creates a repository
named "submodule_update_repo". At first it contains two files, then a
single submodule is added in another commit followed by commits covering
all relevant submodule modifications. This repository is newly cloned into
the "submodule_update" for each test_expect_* to avoid interference
between different parts of the test functions (some to-be-tested commands
also manipulate refs along with the work tree, e.g. "git reset").
Follow-up commits will then call these two test functions for all work
tree manipulating commands (with a combination of all their options
relevant to what they do with the work tree) making sure they work as
expected. Later this test library will be extended to cover merges
resulting in conflicts too. Also it is intended to be easily extendable
for the recursive update functionality, where even more combinations of
submodule modifications have to be tested for.
This version documents two bugs in current Git with expected failures:
*) When a submodule is replaced with a tracked file of the same name the
submodule work tree including any local modifications (and even the
whole history if it uses a .git directory instead of a gitfile!) is
silently removed.
*) Forced work tree updates happily manipulate files in the directory of a
submodule that has just been removed in the superproject (but is of
course still present in the work tree due to the way submodules are
currently handled). This becomes dangerous when files in the submodule
directory are overwritten by files from the new superproject commit, as
any modifications to the submodule files will be lost) and is expected
to also destroy history in the - admittedly unlikely case - the new
commit adds a file named ".git" to the submodule directory.
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller
Jens Lehmann