summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/helper/test-progress.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-04-27progress.c: silence cgcc suggestion about internal linkageLibravatar Đoàn Trần Công Danh1-8/+1
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-21test-progress: fix test failures on big-endian systemsLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
In 't0500-progress-display.sh' all tests running 'test-tool progress --total=<N>' fail on big-endian systems, e.g. like this: + test-tool progress --total=3 Working hard [...] + test_i18ncmp expect out --- expect 2019-10-18 23:07:54.765523916 +0000 +++ out 2019-10-18 23:07:54.773523916 +0000 @@ -1,4 +1,2 @@ -Working hard: 33% (1/3)<CR> -Working hard: 66% (2/3)<CR> -Working hard: 100% (3/3)<CR> -Working hard: 100% (3/3), done. +Working hard: 0% (1/12884901888)<CR> +Working hard: 0% (3/12884901888), done. The reason for that bogus value is that '--total's parameter is parsed via parse-options's OPT_INTEGER into a uint64_t variable [1], so the two bits of 3 end up in the "wrong" bytes on big-endian systems (12884901888 = 0x300000000). Change the type of that variable from uint64_t to int, to match what parse-options expects; in the tests of the progress output we won't use values that don't fit into an int anyway. [1] start_progress() expects the total number as an uint64_t, that's why I chose the same type when declaring the variable holding the value given on the command line. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> [jpag: Debian unstable/ppc64 (big-endian)] Tested-By: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> [tz: Fedora s390x (big-endian)] Tested-By: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-17Test the progress displayLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-0/+81
'progress.c' has seen a few fixes recently [1], and, unfortunately, some of those fixes required further fixes [2]. It seems it's time to have a few tests focusing on the subtleties of the progress display. Add the 'test-tool progress' subcommand to help testing the progress display, reading instructions from standard input and turning them into calls to the display_progress() and display_throughput() functions with the given parameters. The progress display is, however, critically dependent on timing, because it's only updated once every second or, if the toal is known in advance, every 1%, and there is the throughput rate as well. These make the progress display far too undeterministic for testing as-is. To address this, add a few testing-specific variables and functions to 'progress.c', allowing the the new test helper to: - Disable the triggered-every-second SIGALRM and set the 'progress_update' flag explicitly based in the input instructions. This way the progress line will be updated deterministically when the test wants it to be updated. - Specify the time elapsed since start_progress() to make the throughput rate calculations deterministic. Add the new test script 't0500-progress-display.sh' to check a few simple cases with and without throughput, and that a shorter progress line properly covers up the previously displayed line in different situations. [1] See commits 545dc345eb (progress: break too long progress bar lines, 2019-04-12) and 9f1fd84e15 (progress: clear previous progress update dynamically, 2019-04-12). [2] 1aed1a5f25 (progress: avoid empty line when breaking the progress line, 2019-05-19) Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>