summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/README
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-02-27Merge branch 'sg/doc-test-must-fail-args'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+12
Devdoc update. * sg/doc-test-must-fail-args: t: document 'test_must_fail ok=<signal-name>'
2018-02-12t: document 'test_must_fail ok=<signal-name>'Libravatar SZEDER Gábor1-2/+12
Since 'test_might_fail' is implemented as a thin wrapper around 'test_must_fail', it also accepts the same options. Mention this in the docs as well. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-13Merge branch 'tg/t-readme-updates'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+6
Developer doc updates. * tg/t-readme-updates: t/README: document test_cmp_rev t/README: remove mention of adding copyright notices
2017-11-27t/README: document test_cmp_revLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-0/+5
test_cmp_rev is a useful function that's used in quite a few test scripts. It is however not documented in t/README. Document it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-27t/README: remove mention of adding copyright noticesLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-4/+1
We generally no longer include copyright notices in new test scripts. However t/README still mentions it as something to include at the top of every new script. Remove that mention as it's outdated. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-24test-lib: add LIBPCRE1 & LIBPCRE2 prerequisitesLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+12
Add LIBPCRE1 and LIBPCRE2 prerequisites which are true when git is compiled with USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease or USE_LIBPCRE2=YesPlease, respectively. The syntax of PCRE1 and PCRE2 isn't the same in all cases (see pcresyntax(3) and pcre2syntax(3)). If test are added that test for those they'll need to be guarded by these new prerequisites. The subsequent patch will make use of LIBPCRE2, so LIBPCRE1 isn't strictly needed for now, but let's add it for consistency and so that checking for it doesn't have to be done with the less obvious "PCRE, !LIBPCRE2", which while semantically the same is more confusing, and would lead to bugs if PCRE v3 is ever released as the tests would mean v1, not any non-v2 version. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-19t/README: fix typo and grammatically improve a sentenceLibravatar Kaartic Sivaraam1-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-26test-lib: add a PTHREADS prerequisiteLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+4
Add a PTHREADS prerequisite which is false when git is compiled with NO_PTHREADS=YesPlease. There's lots of custom code that runs when threading isn't available, but before this prerequisite there was no way to test it. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-21test-lib: rename the LIBPCRE prerequisite to PCRELibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+2
Rename the LIBPCRE prerequisite to PCRE. This is for preparation for libpcre2 support, where having just "LIBPCRE" would be confusing as it implies v1 of the library. None of these tests are incompatible between versions 1 & 2 of libpcre, it's less confusing to give them a more general name to make it clear that they work on both library versions. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-26t/README: clarify the test_have_prereq documentationLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-3/+5
Clarify the test_have_prereq documentation so that it's clear in the reader's mind when the text says "most common use of this directly" what the answer to "as opposed to what?" is. Usually this function isn't used in lieu of using the prerequisite support built into test_expect_*, mention that explicitly. This changes documentation that I added in commit 9a897893a7 ("t/README: Document the prereq functions, and 3-arg test_*", 2010-07-02). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-22t/README: change "Inside <X> part" to "Inside the <X> part"Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Change the mention of "Inside the <script> part, the standard output..." to use the definite article, which makes more sense in this context. This changes documentation I originally added back in commit 20873f45e7 ("t/README: Document the do's and don'ts of tests", 2010-07-02). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-22t/README: link to metacpan.org, not search.cpan.orgLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Change a link to the web version of the TAP::Parser::Grammar documentation to link to metacpan.org instead of search.cpan.org. This is something I added back in commit 20873f45e7 ("t/README: Document the do's and don'ts of tests", 2010-07-02), at the time search.cpan.org was the more actively maintained CPAN web-interface, nowadays that's metacpan.org. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-26Merge branch 'jk/tap-verbose-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
The Travis CI configuration we ship ran the tests with --verbose option but this risks non-TAP output that happens to be "ok" to be misinterpreted as TAP signalling a test that passed. This resulted in unnecessary failure. This has been corrected by introducing a new mode to run our tests in the test harness to send the verbose output separately to the log file. * jk/tap-verbose-fix: test-lib: bail out when "-v" used under "prove" travis: use --verbose-log test option test-lib: add --verbose-log option test-lib: handle TEST_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY with spaces
2016-10-21test-lib: add --verbose-log optionLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+6
The "--verbose" option redirects output from arbitrary test commands to stdout. This is useful for examining the output manually, like: ./t5547-push-quarantine.sh -v | less But it also means that the output is intermingled with the TAP directives, which can confuse a TAP parser like "prove". This has always been a potential problem, but became an issue recently when one test happened to output the word "ok" on a line by itself, which prove interprets as a test success: $ prove t5547-push-quarantine.sh :: -v t5547-push-quarantine.sh .. 1/? To dest.git * [new branch] HEAD -> master To dest.git ! [remote rejected] reject -> reject (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'dest.git' fatal: git cat-file d08c8eba97f4e683ece08654c7c8d2ba0c03b129: bad file t5547-push-quarantine.sh .. Failed -1/4 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t5547-push-quarantine.sh (Wstat: 0 Tests: 5 Failed: 0) Parse errors: Tests out of sequence. Found (2) but expected (3) Tests out of sequence. Found (3) but expected (4) Tests out of sequence. Found (4) but expected (5) Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 5. Files=1, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr + 0.01 sys = 0.02 CPU) Result: FAIL One answer is "if it hurts, don't do it", but that's not quite the whole story. The Travis tests use "--verbose --tee" so that they can get the benefit of prove's parallel options, along with a verbose log in case there is a failure. We just need the verbose output to go to the log, but keep stdout clean. Getting this right turns out to be surprisingly difficult. Here's the progression of alternatives I considered: 1. Add an option to write verbose output to stderr. This is hard to capture, though, because we want each test to have its own log (because they're all run in parallel and the jumbled output would be useless). 2. Add an option to write verbose output to a file in test-results. This works, but the log is missing all of the non-verbose output, which gives context. 3. Like (2), but teach say_color() to additionally output to the log. This mostly works, but misses any output that happens outside of the say() functions (which isn't a lot, but is a potential maintenance headache). 4. Like (2), but make the log file the same as the "--tee" file. That almost works, but now we have two processes opening the same file. That gives us two separate descriptors, each with their own idea of the current position. They'll each start writing at offset 0, and overwrite each other's data. 5. Like (4), but in each case open the file for appending. That atomically positions each write at the end of the file. It's possible we may still get sheared writes between the two processes, but this is already the case when writing to stdout. It's not a problem in practice because the test harness generally waits for snippets to finish before writing the TAP output. We can ignore buffering issues with tee, because POSIX mandates that it does not buffer. Likewise, POSIX specifies "tee -a", so it should be available everywhere. This patch implements option (5), which seems to work well in practice. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-11Spelling fixesLibravatar Ville Skyttä1-1/+1
<BAD> <CORRECTED> accidently accidentally commited committed dependancy dependency emtpy empty existance existence explicitely explicitly git-upload-achive git-upload-archive hierachy hierarchy indegee indegree intial initial mulitple multiple non-existant non-existent precendence. precedence. priviledged privileged programatically programmatically psuedo-binary pseudo-binary soemwhere somewhere successfull successful transfering transferring uncommited uncommitted unkown unknown usefull useful writting writing Signed-off-by: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-31Merge branch 'jk/test-send-sh-x-trace-elsewhere' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Running tests with '-x' option to trace the individual command executions is a useful way to debug test scripts, but some tests that capture the standard error stream and check what the command said can be broken with the trace output mixed in. When running our tests under "bash", however, we can redirect the trace output to another file descriptor to keep the standard error of programs being tested intact. * jk/test-send-sh-x-trace-elsewhere: test-lib: set BASH_XTRACEFD automatically
2016-05-17Merge branch 'jk/test-send-sh-x-trace-elsewhere'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Running tests with '-x' option to trace the individual command executions is a useful way to debug test scripts, but some tests that capture the standard error stream and check what the command said can be broken with the trace output mixed in. When running our tests under "bash", however, we can redirect the trace output to another file descriptor to keep the standard error of programs being tested intact. * jk/test-send-sh-x-trace-elsewhere: test-lib: set BASH_XTRACEFD automatically
2016-05-11test-lib: set BASH_XTRACEFD automaticallyLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+3
Passing "-x" to a test script enables the shell's "set -x" tracing, which can help with tracking down the command that is causing a failure. Unfortunately, it can also _cause_ failures in some tests that redirect the stderr of a shell function. Inside the function the shell continues to respect "set -x", and the trace output is collected along with whatever stderr is generated normally by the function. You can see an example of this by running: ./t0040-parse-options.sh -x -i which will fail immediately in the first test, as it expects: test_must_fail some-cmd 2>output.err to leave output.err empty (but with "-x" it has our trace output). Unfortunately there isn't a portable or scalable solution to this. We could teach test_must_fail to disable "set -x", but that doesn't help any of the other functions or subshells. However, we can work around it by pointing the "set -x" output to our descriptor 4, which always points to the original stderr of the test script. Unfortunately this only works for bash, but it's better than nothing (and other shells will just ignore the BASH_XTRACEFD variable). The patch itself is a simple one-liner, but note the caveats in the accompanying comments. Automatic tests for our "-x" option may be a bit too meta (and a pain, because they are bash-specific), but I did confirm that it works correctly both with regular "-x" and with "--verbose-only=1". This works because the latter flips "set -x" off and on for particular tests (if it didn't, we would get tracing for all tests, as going to descriptor 4 effectively circumvents the verbose flag). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-30test: facilitate debugging Git executables in tests with gdbLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+5
When prefixing a Git call in the test suite with 'debug ', it will now be run with GDB, allowing the developer to debug test failures more conveniently. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t/test-lib: introduce --chain-lint optionLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+10
It's easy to miss an "&&"-chain in a test script, like: test_expect_success 'check something important' ' cmd1 && cmd2 cmd3 ' The test harness will notice if cmd3 fails, but a failure of cmd1 or cmd2 will go unnoticed, as their exit status is lost after cmd3 runs. The toy example above is easy to spot because the "cmds" are all the same length, but real code is much more complicated. It's also difficult to detect these situations by statically analyzing the shell code with regexps (like the check-non-portable-shell script does); there's too much context required to know whether a &&-chain is appropriate on a given line or not. This patch instead lets the shell check each test by sticking a command with a specific and unusual return code at the top of each test, like: (exit 117) && cmd1 && cmd2 cmd3 In a well-formed test, the non-zero exit from the first command prevents any of the rest from being run, and the test's exit code is 117. In a bad test (like the one above), the 117 is lost, and cmd3 is run. When we encounter a failure of this check, we abort the test script entirely. For one thing, we have no clue which subset of the commands in the test snippet were actually run. Running further tests would be pointless, because we're now in an unknown state. And two, this is not a "test failure" in the traditional sense. The test script is buggy, not the code it is testing. We should be able to fix these problems in the script once, and not have them come back later as a regression in git's code. After checking a test snippet for --chain-lint, we do still run the test itself. We could actually have a pure-lint mode which just checks each test, but there are a few reasons not to. One, because the tests are executing arbitrary code, which could impact the later environment (e.g., that could impact which set of tests we run at all). And two, because a pure-lint mode would still be expensive to run, because a significant amount of code runs outside of the test_expect_* blocks. Instead, this option is designed to be used as part of a normal test suite run, where it adds very little overhead. Turning on this option detects quite a few problems in existing tests, which will be fixed in subsequent patches. However, there are a number of places it cannot reach: - it cannot find a failure to break out of loops on error, like: cmd1 && for i in a b c; do cmd2 $i done && cmd3 which will not notice failures of "cmd2 a" or "cmd b" - it cannot find a missing &&-chain inside a block or subfunction, like: foo () { cmd1 cmd2 } foo && bar which will not notice a failure of cmd1. - it only checks tests that you run; every platform will have some tests skipped due to missing prequisites, so it's impossible to say from one run that the test suite is free of broken &&-chains. However, all tests get run by _somebody_, so eventually we will notice problems. - it does not operate on test_when_finished or prerequisite blocks. It could, but these tends to be much shorter and less of a problem, so I punted on them in this patch. This patch was inspired by an earlier patch by Jonathan Nieder: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235913 This implementation and all bugs are mine. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-22Merge branch 'jc/refer-to-t-readme-from-submitting-patches'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* jc/refer-to-t-readme-from-submitting-patches: t/README: justify why "! grep foo" is sufficient SubmittingPatches: refer to t/README for tests
2014-11-24t/README: justify why "! grep foo" is sufficientLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
We require use of test_must_fail to check expected non-zero exit by Git itself, but discourage test_must_fail to be used for checking exit status of non Git commands that are supplied by the system. The current text explains the reason for the former but not the latter. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-13test-lib.sh: support -x option for shell-tracingLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+6
Usually running a test under "-v" makes it clear which command is failing. However, sometimes it can be useful to also see a complete trace of the shell commands being run in the test. You can do so without any support from the test suite by running "sh -x tXXXX-foo.sh". However, this produces quite a large bit of output, as we see a trace of the entire test suite. This patch instead introduces a "-x" option to the test scripts (i.e., "./tXXXX-foo.sh -x"). When enabled, this turns on "set -x" only for the tests themselves. This can still be a bit verbose, but should keep things to a more manageable level. You can even use "--verbose-only" to see the trace only for a specific test. The implementation is a little invasive. We turn on the "set -x" inside the "eval" of the test code. This lets the eval itself avoid being reported in the trace (which would be long, and redundant with the verbose listing we already showed). And then after the eval runs, we do some trickery with stderr to avoid showing the "set +x" to the user. We also show traces for test_cleanup functions (since they can impact the test outcome, too). However, we do avoid running the noop ":" cleanup (the default if the test does not use test_cleanup at all), as it creates unnecessary noise in the "set -x" output. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-16Merge branch 'ib/test-selectively-run'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+81
Allow specifying only certain individual test pieces to be run using a range notation (e.g. "t1234-test.sh --run='1-4 6 8 9-'"). * ib/test-selectively-run: t0000-*.sh: fix the GIT_SKIP_TESTS sub-tests test-lib: '--run' to run only specific tests test-lib: tests skipped by GIT_SKIP_TESTS say so test-lib: document short options in t/README
2014-06-10test doc: test_write_lines does not split its argumentsLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+3
test_write_lines carefully quotes its arguments as "$@", so test_write_lines "a b" c writes two lines as requested, not three. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-10test: add test_write_lines helperLibravatar Michael S. Tsirkin1-0/+22
API and implementation as suggested by Junio. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-06test-lib: '--run' to run only specific testsLibravatar Ilya Bobyr1-4/+77
Allow better control of the set of tests that will be executed for a single test suite. Mostly useful while debugging or developing as it allows to focus on a specific test. Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-06test-lib: document short options in t/READMELibravatar Ilya Bobyr1-0/+4
Most arguments that could be provided to a test have short forms. Unless documented, the only way to learn them is to read the code. Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-04Merge branch 'jk/wrap-perl-used-in-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+8
* jk/wrap-perl-used-in-tests: t: use perl instead of "$PERL_PATH" where applicable t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH
2013-10-29t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATHLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+8
Once upon a time, we assumed that calling a bare "perl" in the test scripts was OK, because we would find the perl from the user's PATH, and we were only asking that perl to do basic operations that work even on old versions of perl. Later, we found that some systems really prefer to use $PERL_PATH even for these basic cases, because the system perl misbehaves in some way (e.g., by handling line endings differently). We then switched "perl" invocations to "$PERL_PATH" to respect the user's choice. Having to use "$PERL_PATH" is ugly and cumbersome, though. Instead, let's provide a perl() shell function that tests can use, which will transparently do the right thing. Unfortunately, test writers still have to use $PERL_PATH in certain situations, so we still need to keep the advice in the README. Note that this may fix test failures in t5004, t5503, t6002, t6003, t6300, t8001, and t8002, depending on your system's perl setup. All of these can be detected by running: ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl make test which fails before this patch, and passes after. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-28t/README: tests can use perl even with NO_PERLLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+11
The git build system supports a NO_PERL switch to avoid installing perl bindings or other features (like "git add --patch") that rely on perl on runtime, but even with NO_PERL it has not been possible for a long time to run tests without perl. Helpers such as nul_to_q () { "$PERL_PATH" -pe 'y/\000/Q/' } use perl as a better tr or sed and are regularly used in tests without worrying to add a PERL prerequisite. Perl is portable enough that it seems fine to keep relying on it for this kind of thing in tests (and more readable than the alternative of trying to find POSIXy equivalents). Update the test documentation to clarify this. Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-05Merge branch 'tr/test-v-and-v-subtest-only'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
Allows N instances of tests run in parallel, each running 1/N parts of the test suite under Valgrind, to speed things up. * tr/test-v-and-v-subtest-only: perf-lib: fix start/stop of perf tests test-lib: support running tests under valgrind in parallel test-lib: allow prefixing a custom string before "ok N" etc. test-lib: valgrind for only tests matching a pattern test-lib: verbose mode for only tests matching a pattern test-lib: self-test that --verbose works test-lib: rearrange start/end of test_expect_* and test_skip test-lib: refactor $GIT_SKIP_TESTS matching test-lib: enable MALLOC_* for the actual tests
2013-06-23test-lib: valgrind for only tests matching a patternLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+5
With the new --valgrind-only=<pattern> option, one can enable --valgrind at a per-test granularity, exactly analogous to --verbose-only from the previous commit. The options are wired such that --valgrind implies --verbose (as before), but --valgrind-only=<pattern> implies --verbose-only=<pattern> unless --verbose is also in effect. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-23test-lib: verbose mode for only tests matching a patternLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+5
With the new --verbose-only=<pattern> option, one can enable --verbose at a per-test granularity. The pattern is matched against the test number, e.g. ./t0000-basic.sh --verbose-only='2[0-2]' to see only the full output of test 20-22, while showing the rest in the one-liner format. As suggested by Jeff King, this takes care to wrap the entire test_expect_* block, but nothing else, in the verbose toggling. We can use the test_start/end functions from the previous commit for the purpose. This is arguably not *too* useful on its own, but makes the next patch easier to follow. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-20Merge branch 'js/test-ln-s-add'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+14
Many tests that check the behaviour of symbolic links stored in the index or the tree objects do not have to be skipped on a filesystem that lack symbolic link support. * js/test-ln-s-add: t4011: remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t6035: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t3509, t4023, t4114: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t3100: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t3030: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t0000: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite tests: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite (trivial cases) tests: introduce test_ln_s_add t3010: modernize style test-chmtime: Fix exit code on Windows
2013-06-07tests: introduce test_ln_s_addLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+14
Add a new function that creates a symbolic link and adds it to the index to be used in cases where a symbolic link is not required on the file system. We will use it to remove many SYMLINKS prerequisites from test cases. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-04t/README: test_must_fail is for testing GitLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
When a test wants to make sure there is no <string> in an output file, we should just say "! grep string output". "test_must_fail" is there only to test Git command and catch unusual deaths we know about (e.g. segv) as an error, not as an expected failure. "test_must_fail grep string output" is unnecessary, as we are not making sure the system binaries do not dump core or anything like that. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-11Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+9
* maint: Typo fix: replacing it's -> its t: make PIPE a standard test prerequisite archive: clarify explanation of --worktree-attributes t/README: --immediate skips cleanup commands for failed tests
2013-04-11t: make PIPE a standard test prerequisiteLibravatar Adam Spiers1-0/+5
The 'PIPE' test prerequisite was already defined identically by t9010 and t9300, therefore it makes sense to make it a predefined prerequisite. Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-09t/README: --immediate skips cleanup commands for failed testsLibravatar Simon Ruderich1-1/+4
Signed-off-by: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01tests --valgrind: provide a mode without --track-originsLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+5
With --valgrind=memcheck-fast, the tests run under memcheck but without the autodetected --track-origins. If you just run valgrind to see *if* there is any memory issue with your program, the extra information is not needed, and it comes at a roughly 30% hit in runtime. While it is possible to achieve the same through GIT_VALGRIND_OPTIONS, this should be more discoverable and hopefully encourage more users to run their tests with valgrind. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01tests: parameterize --valgrind optionLibravatar Thomas Rast1-5/+10
Running tests under helgrind and DRD recently proved useful in tracking down thread interaction issues. This can unfortunately not be done through GIT_VALGRIND_OPTIONS because any tool other than memcheck would complain about unknown options. Let --valgrind take an optional parameter that describes the valgrind tool to invoke. The default mode is to run memcheck as before. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01t/README: --valgrind already implies -vLibravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+1
This was missed in 3da9365 (Tests: let --valgrind imply --verbose and --tee, 2009-02-04). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-27test-lib: provide UTF8 behaviour as a prerequisiteLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+5
UTF8 behaviour of the filesystem (conversion from nfd to nfc) plays a role in several tests and is tested in several tests. Therefore, move the test from t0050 into the test lib and use the prerequisite in t0050. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-27test-lib: provide case insensitivity as a prerequisiteLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+4
Case insensitivity plays a role in several tests and is tested in several tests. Therefore, move the test from t003 into the test lib and use the prerequisite in t0003. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-24t/README: add a bit more Don'tsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+22
Add a few more advices that we often have to give to new test writers. Also update an example where a double quote pair is used to enclose a test body to use a single quote pair, which is more readable and more importantly gives saner semantics for variable substitution. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Sync with maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-73/+0
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Remove Git's support for smoke testingLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-73/+0
I'm no longer running the Git smoke testing service at smoke.git.nix.is due to Smolder being a fragile piece of software not having time to follow through on making it easy for third parties to run and submit their own smoke tests. So remove the support in Git for sending smoke tests to smoke.git.nix.is, it's still easy to modify the test suite to submit smokes somewhere else. This reverts the following commits: Revert "t/README: Add SMOKE_{COMMENT,TAGS}= to smoke_report target" -- e38efac87d Revert "t/README: Document the Smoke testing" -- d15e9ebc5c Revert "t/Makefile: Create test-results dir for smoke target" -- 617344d77b Revert "tests: Infrastructure for Git smoke testing" -- b6b84d1b74 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-17test-lib: add the test_pause convenience functionLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+13
Since 781f76b15 (test-lib: redirect stdin of tests) you can't simply put a "bash &&" into a test for debugging purposes anymore. Instead you'll have to use "bash <&6 >&3 2>&4". As that invocation is not that easy to remember add the test_pause convenience function. It invokes "$SHELL_PATH" to provide a sane shell for the user. This function also checks if the -v flag is given and will error out if that is not the case instead of letting the test hang until ^D is pressed. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-30Merge branch 'mk/grep-pcre'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
* mk/grep-pcre: git-grep: Fix problems with recently added tests git-grep: Update tests (mainly for -P) Makefile: Pass USE_LIBPCRE down in GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS git-grep: update tests now regexp type is "last one wins" git-grep: do not die upon -F/-P when grep.extendedRegexp is set. git-grep: Bail out when -P is used with -F or -E grep: Add basic tests configure: Check for libpcre git-grep: Learn PCRE grep: Extract compile_regexp_failed() from compile_regexp() grep: Fix a typo in a comment grep: Put calls to fixmatch() and regmatch() into patmatch() contrib/completion: --line-number to git grep Documentation: Add --line-number to git-grep synopsis