summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/README
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-05-31Merge branch 'jk/test-send-sh-x-trace-elsewhere' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Running tests with '-x' option to trace the individual command executions is a useful way to debug test scripts, but some tests that capture the standard error stream and check what the command said can be broken with the trace output mixed in. When running our tests under "bash", however, we can redirect the trace output to another file descriptor to keep the standard error of programs being tested intact. * jk/test-send-sh-x-trace-elsewhere: test-lib: set BASH_XTRACEFD automatically
2016-05-11test-lib: set BASH_XTRACEFD automaticallyLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+3
Passing "-x" to a test script enables the shell's "set -x" tracing, which can help with tracking down the command that is causing a failure. Unfortunately, it can also _cause_ failures in some tests that redirect the stderr of a shell function. Inside the function the shell continues to respect "set -x", and the trace output is collected along with whatever stderr is generated normally by the function. You can see an example of this by running: ./t0040-parse-options.sh -x -i which will fail immediately in the first test, as it expects: test_must_fail some-cmd 2>output.err to leave output.err empty (but with "-x" it has our trace output). Unfortunately there isn't a portable or scalable solution to this. We could teach test_must_fail to disable "set -x", but that doesn't help any of the other functions or subshells. However, we can work around it by pointing the "set -x" output to our descriptor 4, which always points to the original stderr of the test script. Unfortunately this only works for bash, but it's better than nothing (and other shells will just ignore the BASH_XTRACEFD variable). The patch itself is a simple one-liner, but note the caveats in the accompanying comments. Automatic tests for our "-x" option may be a bit too meta (and a pain, because they are bash-specific), but I did confirm that it works correctly both with regular "-x" and with "--verbose-only=1". This works because the latter flips "set -x" off and on for particular tests (if it didn't, we would get tracing for all tests, as going to descriptor 4 effectively circumvents the verbose flag). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-30test: facilitate debugging Git executables in tests with gdbLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+5
When prefixing a Git call in the test suite with 'debug ', it will now be run with GDB, allowing the developer to debug test failures more conveniently. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t/test-lib: introduce --chain-lint optionLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+10
It's easy to miss an "&&"-chain in a test script, like: test_expect_success 'check something important' ' cmd1 && cmd2 cmd3 ' The test harness will notice if cmd3 fails, but a failure of cmd1 or cmd2 will go unnoticed, as their exit status is lost after cmd3 runs. The toy example above is easy to spot because the "cmds" are all the same length, but real code is much more complicated. It's also difficult to detect these situations by statically analyzing the shell code with regexps (like the check-non-portable-shell script does); there's too much context required to know whether a &&-chain is appropriate on a given line or not. This patch instead lets the shell check each test by sticking a command with a specific and unusual return code at the top of each test, like: (exit 117) && cmd1 && cmd2 cmd3 In a well-formed test, the non-zero exit from the first command prevents any of the rest from being run, and the test's exit code is 117. In a bad test (like the one above), the 117 is lost, and cmd3 is run. When we encounter a failure of this check, we abort the test script entirely. For one thing, we have no clue which subset of the commands in the test snippet were actually run. Running further tests would be pointless, because we're now in an unknown state. And two, this is not a "test failure" in the traditional sense. The test script is buggy, not the code it is testing. We should be able to fix these problems in the script once, and not have them come back later as a regression in git's code. After checking a test snippet for --chain-lint, we do still run the test itself. We could actually have a pure-lint mode which just checks each test, but there are a few reasons not to. One, because the tests are executing arbitrary code, which could impact the later environment (e.g., that could impact which set of tests we run at all). And two, because a pure-lint mode would still be expensive to run, because a significant amount of code runs outside of the test_expect_* blocks. Instead, this option is designed to be used as part of a normal test suite run, where it adds very little overhead. Turning on this option detects quite a few problems in existing tests, which will be fixed in subsequent patches. However, there are a number of places it cannot reach: - it cannot find a failure to break out of loops on error, like: cmd1 && for i in a b c; do cmd2 $i done && cmd3 which will not notice failures of "cmd2 a" or "cmd b" - it cannot find a missing &&-chain inside a block or subfunction, like: foo () { cmd1 cmd2 } foo && bar which will not notice a failure of cmd1. - it only checks tests that you run; every platform will have some tests skipped due to missing prequisites, so it's impossible to say from one run that the test suite is free of broken &&-chains. However, all tests get run by _somebody_, so eventually we will notice problems. - it does not operate on test_when_finished or prerequisite blocks. It could, but these tends to be much shorter and less of a problem, so I punted on them in this patch. This patch was inspired by an earlier patch by Jonathan Nieder: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235913 This implementation and all bugs are mine. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-22Merge branch 'jc/refer-to-t-readme-from-submitting-patches'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* jc/refer-to-t-readme-from-submitting-patches: t/README: justify why "! grep foo" is sufficient SubmittingPatches: refer to t/README for tests
2014-11-24t/README: justify why "! grep foo" is sufficientLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
We require use of test_must_fail to check expected non-zero exit by Git itself, but discourage test_must_fail to be used for checking exit status of non Git commands that are supplied by the system. The current text explains the reason for the former but not the latter. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-13test-lib.sh: support -x option for shell-tracingLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+6
Usually running a test under "-v" makes it clear which command is failing. However, sometimes it can be useful to also see a complete trace of the shell commands being run in the test. You can do so without any support from the test suite by running "sh -x tXXXX-foo.sh". However, this produces quite a large bit of output, as we see a trace of the entire test suite. This patch instead introduces a "-x" option to the test scripts (i.e., "./tXXXX-foo.sh -x"). When enabled, this turns on "set -x" only for the tests themselves. This can still be a bit verbose, but should keep things to a more manageable level. You can even use "--verbose-only" to see the trace only for a specific test. The implementation is a little invasive. We turn on the "set -x" inside the "eval" of the test code. This lets the eval itself avoid being reported in the trace (which would be long, and redundant with the verbose listing we already showed). And then after the eval runs, we do some trickery with stderr to avoid showing the "set +x" to the user. We also show traces for test_cleanup functions (since they can impact the test outcome, too). However, we do avoid running the noop ":" cleanup (the default if the test does not use test_cleanup at all), as it creates unnecessary noise in the "set -x" output. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-16Merge branch 'ib/test-selectively-run'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+81
Allow specifying only certain individual test pieces to be run using a range notation (e.g. "t1234-test.sh --run='1-4 6 8 9-'"). * ib/test-selectively-run: t0000-*.sh: fix the GIT_SKIP_TESTS sub-tests test-lib: '--run' to run only specific tests test-lib: tests skipped by GIT_SKIP_TESTS say so test-lib: document short options in t/README
2014-06-10test doc: test_write_lines does not split its argumentsLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+3
test_write_lines carefully quotes its arguments as "$@", so test_write_lines "a b" c writes two lines as requested, not three. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-10test: add test_write_lines helperLibravatar Michael S. Tsirkin1-0/+22
API and implementation as suggested by Junio. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-06test-lib: '--run' to run only specific testsLibravatar Ilya Bobyr1-4/+77
Allow better control of the set of tests that will be executed for a single test suite. Mostly useful while debugging or developing as it allows to focus on a specific test. Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-06test-lib: document short options in t/READMELibravatar Ilya Bobyr1-0/+4
Most arguments that could be provided to a test have short forms. Unless documented, the only way to learn them is to read the code. Signed-off-by: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-04Merge branch 'jk/wrap-perl-used-in-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+8
* jk/wrap-perl-used-in-tests: t: use perl instead of "$PERL_PATH" where applicable t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATH
2013-10-29t: provide a perl() function which uses $PERL_PATHLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+8
Once upon a time, we assumed that calling a bare "perl" in the test scripts was OK, because we would find the perl from the user's PATH, and we were only asking that perl to do basic operations that work even on old versions of perl. Later, we found that some systems really prefer to use $PERL_PATH even for these basic cases, because the system perl misbehaves in some way (e.g., by handling line endings differently). We then switched "perl" invocations to "$PERL_PATH" to respect the user's choice. Having to use "$PERL_PATH" is ugly and cumbersome, though. Instead, let's provide a perl() shell function that tests can use, which will transparently do the right thing. Unfortunately, test writers still have to use $PERL_PATH in certain situations, so we still need to keep the advice in the README. Note that this may fix test failures in t5004, t5503, t6002, t6003, t6300, t8001, and t8002, depending on your system's perl setup. All of these can be detected by running: ln -s /bin/false bin-wrappers/perl make test which fails before this patch, and passes after. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-28t/README: tests can use perl even with NO_PERLLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+11
The git build system supports a NO_PERL switch to avoid installing perl bindings or other features (like "git add --patch") that rely on perl on runtime, but even with NO_PERL it has not been possible for a long time to run tests without perl. Helpers such as nul_to_q () { "$PERL_PATH" -pe 'y/\000/Q/' } use perl as a better tr or sed and are regularly used in tests without worrying to add a PERL prerequisite. Perl is portable enough that it seems fine to keep relying on it for this kind of thing in tests (and more readable than the alternative of trying to find POSIXy equivalents). Update the test documentation to clarify this. Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-05Merge branch 'tr/test-v-and-v-subtest-only'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
Allows N instances of tests run in parallel, each running 1/N parts of the test suite under Valgrind, to speed things up. * tr/test-v-and-v-subtest-only: perf-lib: fix start/stop of perf tests test-lib: support running tests under valgrind in parallel test-lib: allow prefixing a custom string before "ok N" etc. test-lib: valgrind for only tests matching a pattern test-lib: verbose mode for only tests matching a pattern test-lib: self-test that --verbose works test-lib: rearrange start/end of test_expect_* and test_skip test-lib: refactor $GIT_SKIP_TESTS matching test-lib: enable MALLOC_* for the actual tests
2013-06-23test-lib: valgrind for only tests matching a patternLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+5
With the new --valgrind-only=<pattern> option, one can enable --valgrind at a per-test granularity, exactly analogous to --verbose-only from the previous commit. The options are wired such that --valgrind implies --verbose (as before), but --valgrind-only=<pattern> implies --verbose-only=<pattern> unless --verbose is also in effect. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-23test-lib: verbose mode for only tests matching a patternLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+5
With the new --verbose-only=<pattern> option, one can enable --verbose at a per-test granularity. The pattern is matched against the test number, e.g. ./t0000-basic.sh --verbose-only='2[0-2]' to see only the full output of test 20-22, while showing the rest in the one-liner format. As suggested by Jeff King, this takes care to wrap the entire test_expect_* block, but nothing else, in the verbose toggling. We can use the test_start/end functions from the previous commit for the purpose. This is arguably not *too* useful on its own, but makes the next patch easier to follow. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-20Merge branch 'js/test-ln-s-add'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+14
Many tests that check the behaviour of symbolic links stored in the index or the tree objects do not have to be skipped on a filesystem that lack symbolic link support. * js/test-ln-s-add: t4011: remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t6035: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t3509, t4023, t4114: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t3100: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t3030: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite t0000: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite tests: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite (trivial cases) tests: introduce test_ln_s_add t3010: modernize style test-chmtime: Fix exit code on Windows
2013-06-07tests: introduce test_ln_s_addLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+14
Add a new function that creates a symbolic link and adds it to the index to be used in cases where a symbolic link is not required on the file system. We will use it to remove many SYMLINKS prerequisites from test cases. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-04t/README: test_must_fail is for testing GitLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
When a test wants to make sure there is no <string> in an output file, we should just say "! grep string output". "test_must_fail" is there only to test Git command and catch unusual deaths we know about (e.g. segv) as an error, not as an expected failure. "test_must_fail grep string output" is unnecessary, as we are not making sure the system binaries do not dump core or anything like that. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-11Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+9
* maint: Typo fix: replacing it's -> its t: make PIPE a standard test prerequisite archive: clarify explanation of --worktree-attributes t/README: --immediate skips cleanup commands for failed tests
2013-04-11t: make PIPE a standard test prerequisiteLibravatar Adam Spiers1-0/+5
The 'PIPE' test prerequisite was already defined identically by t9010 and t9300, therefore it makes sense to make it a predefined prerequisite. Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-09t/README: --immediate skips cleanup commands for failed testsLibravatar Simon Ruderich1-1/+4
Signed-off-by: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01tests --valgrind: provide a mode without --track-originsLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+5
With --valgrind=memcheck-fast, the tests run under memcheck but without the autodetected --track-origins. If you just run valgrind to see *if* there is any memory issue with your program, the extra information is not needed, and it comes at a roughly 30% hit in runtime. While it is possible to achieve the same through GIT_VALGRIND_OPTIONS, this should be more discoverable and hopefully encourage more users to run their tests with valgrind. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01tests: parameterize --valgrind optionLibravatar Thomas Rast1-5/+10
Running tests under helgrind and DRD recently proved useful in tracking down thread interaction issues. This can unfortunately not be done through GIT_VALGRIND_OPTIONS because any tool other than memcheck would complain about unknown options. Let --valgrind take an optional parameter that describes the valgrind tool to invoke. The default mode is to run memcheck as before. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01t/README: --valgrind already implies -vLibravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+1
This was missed in 3da9365 (Tests: let --valgrind imply --verbose and --tee, 2009-02-04). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-27test-lib: provide UTF8 behaviour as a prerequisiteLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+5
UTF8 behaviour of the filesystem (conversion from nfd to nfc) plays a role in several tests and is tested in several tests. Therefore, move the test from t0050 into the test lib and use the prerequisite in t0050. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-27test-lib: provide case insensitivity as a prerequisiteLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+4
Case insensitivity plays a role in several tests and is tested in several tests. Therefore, move the test from t003 into the test lib and use the prerequisite in t0003. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-24t/README: add a bit more Don'tsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+22
Add a few more advices that we often have to give to new test writers. Also update an example where a double quote pair is used to enclose a test body to use a single quote pair, which is more readable and more importantly gives saner semantics for variable substitution. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Sync with maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-73/+0
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Remove Git's support for smoke testingLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-73/+0
I'm no longer running the Git smoke testing service at smoke.git.nix.is due to Smolder being a fragile piece of software not having time to follow through on making it easy for third parties to run and submit their own smoke tests. So remove the support in Git for sending smoke tests to smoke.git.nix.is, it's still easy to modify the test suite to submit smokes somewhere else. This reverts the following commits: Revert "t/README: Add SMOKE_{COMMENT,TAGS}= to smoke_report target" -- e38efac87d Revert "t/README: Document the Smoke testing" -- d15e9ebc5c Revert "t/Makefile: Create test-results dir for smoke target" -- 617344d77b Revert "tests: Infrastructure for Git smoke testing" -- b6b84d1b74 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-17test-lib: add the test_pause convenience functionLibravatar Jens Lehmann1-0/+13
Since 781f76b15 (test-lib: redirect stdin of tests) you can't simply put a "bash &&" into a test for debugging purposes anymore. Instead you'll have to use "bash <&6 >&3 2>&4". As that invocation is not that easy to remember add the test_pause convenience function. It invokes "$SHELL_PATH" to provide a sane shell for the user. This function also checks if the -v flag is given and will error out if that is not the case instead of letting the test hang until ^D is pressed. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-30Merge branch 'mk/grep-pcre'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
* mk/grep-pcre: git-grep: Fix problems with recently added tests git-grep: Update tests (mainly for -P) Makefile: Pass USE_LIBPCRE down in GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS git-grep: update tests now regexp type is "last one wins" git-grep: do not die upon -F/-P when grep.extendedRegexp is set. git-grep: Bail out when -P is used with -F or -E grep: Add basic tests configure: Check for libpcre git-grep: Learn PCRE grep: Extract compile_regexp_failed() from compile_regexp() grep: Fix a typo in a comment grep: Put calls to fixmatch() and regmatch() into patmatch() contrib/completion: --line-number to git grep Documentation: Add --line-number to git-grep synopsis
2011-05-09grep: Add basic testsLibravatar Michał Kiedrowicz1-0/+5
This modest patch adds simple tests for git grep -P/--perl-regexp and its interoperation with -i and -w. Tests are only enabled when prerequisite LIBPCRE is defined (it's automatically set based on USE_LIBPCRE in test-lib.sh). Signed-off-by: Michał Kiedrowicz <michal.kiedrowicz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-26t/README: unify documentation of test function argsLibravatar Mathias Lafeldt1-8/+9
Document all test function arguments in the same way. While at it, tweak the description of test_path_is_* (thanks to Junio), and correct some grammatical errors. Signed-off-by: Mathias Lafeldt <misfire@debugon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-30Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+4
* maint: contrib/thunderbird-patch-inline: do not require bash to run the script t8001: check the exit status of the command being tested strbuf.h: remove a tad stale docs-in-comment and reference api-doc instead Typos: t/README Documentation/config.txt: make truth value of numbers more explicit git-pack-objects.txt: fix grammatical errors parse-remote: replace unnecessary sed invocation
2011-03-30Typos: t/READMELibravatar Michael Witten1-5/+4
Signed-off-by: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-20Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
* maint: Update draft release notes to 1.7.4.2 Work around broken ln on solaris as used in t8006 t/README: Add a note about running commands under valgrind
2011-03-20t/README: Add a note about running commands under valgrindLibravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-0/+7
The test suite runs valgrind with certain options activated. Add a note saying how to run commands under the same conditions as the test suite does. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-15Documentation: running test with --debug keeps "trash" directoryLibravatar Piotr Krukowiecki1-0/+4
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-09Fix typo in t/READMELibravatar Mathias Lafeldt1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Mathias Lafeldt <misfire@debugon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-01-11t/README: hint about using $(pwd) rather than $PWD in testsLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-0/+6
This adds just a "do it this way" instruction without a lot of explanation, because the details are too complex to be explained at this point. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-24Merge branch 'en/and-cascade-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-15/+18
* en/and-cascade-tests: (25 commits) t4124 (apply --whitespace): use test_might_fail t3404: do not use 'describe' to implement test_cmp_rev t3404 (rebase -i): introduce helper to check position of HEAD t3404 (rebase -i): move comment to description t3404 (rebase -i): unroll test_commit loops t3301 (notes): use test_expect_code for clarity t1400 (update-ref): use test_must_fail t1502 (rev-parse --parseopt): test exit code from "-h" t6022 (renaming merge): chain test commands with && test-lib: introduce test_line_count to measure files tests: add missing &&, batch 2 tests: add missing && Introduce sane_unset and use it to ensure proper && chaining t7800 (difftool): add missing && t7601 (merge-pull-config): add missing && t7001 (mv): add missing && t6016 (rev-list-graph-simplify-history): add missing && t5602 (clone-remote-exec): add missing && t4026 (color): remove unneeded and unchained command t4019 (diff-wserror): add lots of missing && ... Conflicts: t/t7006-pager.sh
2010-11-09test-lib: introduce test_line_count to measure filesLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+4
Some tests check their output with code like the following: test "$(git ls-files -u B | wc -l)" -eq 3 || { echo "BAD: should have left stages for B" return 1 } The verbose failure condition is used because test, unlike diff, does not print any useful information about the nature of the failure when it fails. Introduce a test_line_count function to help. If used like git ls-files -u B >output && test_line_count -eq 3 output it will produce output like test_line_count: line count for output !-eq 3 100644 b023018cabc396e7692c70bbf5784a93d3f738ab 2 hi.c 100644 45b983be36b73c0788dc9cbcb76cbb80fc7bb057 3 hi.c on failure. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-26test: allow running the tests under "prove"Libravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+6
You can run "make DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove test" to run the test under "prove" (or $(PROVE) if set). The output is a bit easier to read when running many tests in parallel. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Liked-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Liked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-06Introduce sane_unset and use it to ensure proper && chainingLibravatar Elijah Newren1-8/+5
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-06test-lib: make test_expect_code a test commandLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-7/+9
Change test_expect_code to be a normal test command instead of a top-level command. As a top-level command it would fail in cases like: test_expect_code 1 'phoney' ' foo && bar && (exit 1) ' Here the test might incorrectly succeed if "foo" or "bar" happened to fail with exit status 1. Instead we now do: test_expect_success 'phoney' ' foo && bar && test_expect_code 1 "(exit 1)" ' Which will only succeed if "foo" and "bar" return status 0, and "(exit 1)" returns status 1. Note that test_expect_code has been made slightly noisier, as it reports the exit code it receives even upon success. Some test code in t0000-basic.sh relied on the old semantics of test_expect_code to test the test_when_finished command. I've converted that code to use an external test similar to the TODO test I added in v1.7.3-rc0~2^2~3. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-04Merge branch 'ab/test-2'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+193
* ab/test-2: (51 commits) tests: factor HOME=$(pwd) in test-lib.sh test-lib: use subshell instead of cd $new && .. && cd $old tests: simplify "missing PREREQ" message t/t0000-basic.sh: Run the passing TODO test inside its own test-lib test-lib: Allow overriding of TEST_DIRECTORY test-lib: Use "$GIT_BUILD_DIR" instead of "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/../ test-lib: Use $TEST_DIRECTORY or $GIT_BUILD_DIR instead of $(pwd) and ../ test: Introduce $GIT_BUILD_DIR cvs tests: do not touch test CVS repositories shipped with source t/t9602-cvsimport-branches-tags.sh: Add a PERL prerequisite t/t9601-cvsimport-vendor-branch.sh: Add a PERL prerequisite t/t7105-reset-patch.sh: Add a PERL prerequisite t/t9001-send-email.sh: convert setup code to tests t/t9001-send-email.sh: change from skip_all=* to prereq skip t/t9001-send-email.sh: Remove needless PROG=* assignment t/t9600-cvsimport.sh: change from skip_all=* to prereq skip lib-patch-mode tests: change from skip_all=* to prereq skip t/t3701-add-interactive.sh: change from skip_all=* to prereq skip tests: Move FILEMODE prerequisite to lib-prereq-FILEMODE.sh t/Makefile: Create test-results dir for smoke target ... Conflicts: t/t6035-merge-dir-to-symlink.sh
2010-08-18t/README: Update "Skipping tests" to align with best practicesLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-3/+18
The example I initially added to "Skipping tests" wasn't very good. We'd rather skip tests using the three-arg prereq form to the test_* functions, not bail out with a skip message. Change the documentation to reflect that, but retain the bailout example under a disclaimer which explains that it's probably not a good idea to use it. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>