summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sequencer.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-11-18Merge branch 'en/merge-ort-api-null-impl'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
Preparation for a new merge strategy. * en/merge-ort-api-null-impl: merge,rebase,revert: select ort or recursive by config or environment fast-rebase: demonstrate merge-ort's API via new test-tool command merge-ort-wrappers: new convience wrappers to mimic the old merge API merge-ort: barebones API of new merge strategy with empty implementation
2020-11-18Merge branch 'pw/rebase-i-orig-head'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+4
"git rebase -i" did not store ORIG_HEAD correctly. * pw/rebase-i-orig-head: rebase -i: simplify get_revision_ranges() rebase -i: use struct object_id when writing state rebase -i: use struct object_id rather than looking up commit rebase -i: stop overwriting ORIG_HEAD buffer
2020-11-09Merge branch 'jk/committer-date-is-author-date-fix-simplify'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
Code simplification. * jk/committer-date-is-author-date-fix-simplify: am, sequencer: stop parsing our own committer ident
2020-11-04rebase -i: use struct object_id when writing stateLibravatar Phillip Wood1-1/+1
Rather than passing a string around pass the struct object_id that the string was created from call oid_hex() when we write the file. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-04rebase -i: use struct object_id rather than looking up commitLibravatar Phillip Wood1-2/+3
We already have a struct object_id containing the oid that we want to set ORIG_HEAD to so use that rather than converting it to a string and then calling get_oid() on that string. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-02merge,rebase,revert: select ort or recursive by config or environmentLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+1
Allow the testsuite to run where it treats requests for "recursive" or the default merge algorithm via consulting the environment variable GIT_TEST_MERGE_ALGORITHM which is expected to either be "recursive" (the old traditional algorithm) or "ort" (the new algorithm). Also, allow folks to pick the new algorithm via config setting. It turns out builtin/merge.c already had a way to allow users to specify a different default merge algorithm: pull.twohead. Rather odd configuration name (especially to be in the 'pull' namespace rather than 'merge') but it's there. Add that same configuration to rebase, cherry-pick, and revert. This required updating the various callsites that called merge_trees() or merge_recursive() to conditionally call the new API, so this serves as another demonstration of what the new API looks and feels like. There are almost certainly some callsites that have not yet been modified to work with the new merge algorithm, but this represents the ones that I have been testing with thus far. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-26am, sequencer: stop parsing our own committer identLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+0
For the --committer-date-is-author-date option of git-am and git-rebase, we format the committer ident, then re-parse it to find the name and email, and then feed those back to fmt_ident(). We can simplify this by handling it all at the time of the fmt_ident() call. We pass in the appropriate getenv() results, and if they're not present, then our WANT_COMMITTER_IDENT flag tells fmt_ident() to fill in the appropriate value from the config. Which is exactly what git_committer_ident() was doing under the hood. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-03Merge branch 'pw/rebase-i-more-options'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
"git rebase -i" learns a bit more options. * pw/rebase-i-more-options: t3436: do not run git-merge-recursive in dashed form rebase: add --reset-author-date rebase -i: support --ignore-date rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-date am: stop exporting GIT_COMMITTER_DATE rebase -i: add --ignore-whitespace flag
2020-08-19rebase -i: support --ignore-dateLibravatar Phillip Wood1-0/+1
Rebase is implemented with two different backends - 'apply' and 'merge' each of which support a different set of options. In particular the apply backend supports a number of options implemented by 'git am' that are not implemented in the merge backend. This means that the available options are different depending on which backend is used which is confusing. This patch adds support for the --ignore-date option to the merge backend. This option uses the current time as the author date rather than reusing the original author date when rewriting commits. We take care to handle the combination of --ignore-date and --committer-date-is-author-date in the same way as the apply backend. Original-patch-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-17rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-dateLibravatar Phillip Wood1-0/+3
Rebase is implemented with two different backends - 'apply' and 'merge' each of which support a different set of options. In particular the apply backend supports a number of options implemented by 'git am' that are not implemented in the merge backend. This means that the available options are different depending on which backend is used which is confusing. This patch adds support for the --committer-date-is-author-date option to the merge backend. This option uses the author date of the commit that is being rewritten as the committer date when the new commit is created. Original-patch-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-29Merge branch 'dl/merge-autostash'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+20
"git merge" learns the "--autostash" option. * dl/merge-autostash: (22 commits) pull: pass --autostash to merge t5520: make test_pull_autostash() accept expect_parent_num merge: teach --autostash option sequencer: implement apply_autostash_oid() sequencer: implement save_autostash() sequencer: unlink autostash in apply_autostash() sequencer: extract perform_autostash() from rebase rebase: generify create_autostash() rebase: extract create_autostash() reset: extract reset_head() from rebase rebase: generify reset_head() rebase: use apply_autostash() from sequencer.c sequencer: rename stash_sha1 to stash_oid sequencer: make apply_autostash() accept a path rebase: use read_oneliner() sequencer: make read_oneliner() extern sequencer: configurably warn on non-existent files sequencer: make read_oneliner() accept flags sequencer: make file exists check more efficient sequencer: stop leaking buf ...
2020-04-22Merge branch 'jt/rebase-allow-duplicate'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Allow "git rebase" to reapply all local commits, even if the may be already in the upstream, without checking first. * jt/rebase-allow-duplicate: rebase --merge: optionally skip upstreamed commits
2020-04-22Merge branch 'en/rebase-no-keep-empty'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git rebase" (again) learns to honor "--no-keep-empty", which lets the user to discard commits that are empty from the beginning (as opposed to the ones that become empty because of rebasing). The interactive rebase also marks commits that are empty in the todo. * en/rebase-no-keep-empty: rebase: fix an incompatible-options error message rebase: reinstate --no-keep-empty rebase -i: mark commits that begin empty in todo editor
2020-04-11rebase --merge: optionally skip upstreamed commitsLibravatar Jonathan Tan1-1/+1
When rebasing against an upstream that has had many commits since the original branch was created: O -- O -- ... -- O -- O (upstream) \ -- O (my-dev-branch) it must read the contents of every novel upstream commit, in addition to the tip of the upstream and the merge base, because "git rebase" attempts to exclude commits that are duplicates of upstream ones. This can be a significant performance hit, especially in a partial clone, wherein a read of an object may end up being a fetch. Add a flag to "git rebase" to allow suppression of this feature. This flag only works when using the "merge" backend. This flag changes the behavior of sequencer_make_script(), called from do_interactive_rebase() <- run_rebase_interactive() <- run_specific_rebase() <- cmd_rebase(). With this flag, limit_list() (indirectly called from sequencer_make_script() through prepare_revision_walk()) will no longer call cherry_pick_list(), and thus PATCHSAME is no longer set. Refraining from setting PATCHSAME both means that the intermediate commits in upstream are no longer read (as shown by the test) and means that no PATCHSAME-caused skipping of commits is done by sequencer_make_script(), either directly or through make_script_with_merges(). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-11rebase: reinstate --no-keep-emptyLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
Commit d48e5e21da ("rebase (interactive-backend): make --keep-empty the default", 2020-02-15) turned --keep-empty (for keeping commits which start empty) into the default. The logic underpinning that commit was: 1) 'git commit' errors out on the creation of empty commits without an override flag 2) Once someone determines that the override is worthwhile, it's annoying and/or harmful to required them to take extra steps in order to keep such commits around (and to repeat such steps with every rebase). While the logic on which the decision was made is sound, the result was a bit of an overcorrection. Instead of jumping to having --keep-empty being the default, it jumped to making --keep-empty the only available behavior. There was a simple workaround, though, which was thought to be good enough at the time. People could still drop commits which started empty the same way the could drop any commits: by firing up an interactive rebase and picking out the commits they didn't want from the list. However, there are cases where external tools might create enough empty commits that picking all of them out is painful. As such, having a flag to automatically remove start-empty commits may be beneficial. Provide users a way to drop commits which start empty using a flag that existed for years: --no-keep-empty. Interpret --keep-empty as countermanding any previous --no-keep-empty, but otherwise leaving --keep-empty as the default. This might lead to some slight weirdness since commands like git rebase --empty=drop --keep-empty git rebase --empty=keep --no-keep-empty look really weird despite making perfect sense (the first will drop commits which become empty, but keep commits that started empty; the second will keep commits which become empty, but drop commits which started empty). However, --no-keep-empty was named years ago and we are predominantly keeping it for backward compatibility; also we suspect it will only be used rarely since folks already have a simple way to drop commits they don't want with an interactive rebase. Reported-by: Bryan Turner <bturner@atlassian.com> Reported-by: Sami Boukortt <sami@boukortt.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-10sequencer: implement apply_autostash_oid()Libravatar Denton Liu1-0/+1
Split apply_save_autostash() into apply_autostash_oid() and apply_save_autostash() where the former operates on an OID string and the latter reads the OID from a file before passing it into apply_save_autostash_oid(). This function is required for a future commmit which will rely on being able to apply an autostash whose OID is stored as a string. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-10sequencer: implement save_autostash()Libravatar Denton Liu1-0/+1
Extract common functionality of apply_autostash() into apply_save_autostash() and use it to implement save_autostash(). This function will be used in a future commit. The difference between save_autostash() and apply_autostash() is that the former does not try to apply the stash. It skips that step and just stores the created entry in the stash reflog. This is useful in the case where we abort an operation when an autostash is present but we don't want to dirty the worktree with the application of the stash. For example, in a future commit, we will implement `git merge --autostash`. Since merges can be aborted using `git reset --hard`, we'd make use of save_autostash() to save the autostash entry instead of applying it to the worktree thus keeping the worktree undirtied. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-10sequencer: extract perform_autostash() from rebaseLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+2
Lib-ify the autostash code by extracting perform_autostash() from rebase into sequencer. In a future commit, this will be used to implement `--autostash` in other builtins. This patch is best viewed with `--color-moved`. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-10rebase: use apply_autostash() from sequencer.cLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+2
The apply_autostash() function in builtin/rebase.c is similar enough to the apply_autostash() function in sequencer.c that they are almost interchangeable, except for the type of arg they accept. Make the sequencer.c version extern and use it in rebase. The rebase version was introduced in 6defce2b02 (builtin rebase: support `--autostash` option, 2018-09-04) as part of the shell to C conversion. It opted to duplicate the function because, at the time, there was another in-progress project converting interactive rebase from shell to C as well and they did not want to clash with them by refactoring sequencer.c version of apply_autostash(). Since both efforts are long done, we can freely combine them together now. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-07sequencer: make read_oneliner() externLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+14
The function read_oneliner() is a generally useful util function. Instead of hiding it as a static function within sequencer.c, extern it so that it can be reused by others. This patch is best viewed with --color-moved. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-25Merge branch 'pw/advise-rebase-skip'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
The mechanism to prevent "git commit" from making an empty commit or amending during an interrupted cherry-pick was broken during the rewrite of "git rebase" in C, which has been corrected. * pw/advise-rebase-skip: commit: give correct advice for empty commit during a rebase commit: encapsulate determine_whence() for sequencer commit: use enum value for multiple cherry-picks sequencer: write CHERRY_PICK_HEAD for reword and edit cherry-pick: check commit error messages cherry-pick: add test for `--skip` advice in `git commit` t3404: use test_cmp_rev
2020-03-02Merge branch 'en/rebase-backend'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
"git rebase" has learned to use the merge backend (i.e. the machinery that drives "rebase -i") by default, while allowing "--apply" option to use the "apply" backend (e.g. the moral equivalent of "format-patch piped to am"). The rebase.backend configuration variable can be set to customize. * en/rebase-backend: rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends rebase: change the default backend from "am" to "merge" rebase: make the backend configurable via config setting rebase tests: repeat some tests using the merge backend instead of am rebase tests: mark tests specific to the am-backend with --am rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for interactive-based rebases git-prompt: change the prompt for interactive-based rebases rebase: add an --am option rebase: move incompatibility checks between backend options a bit earlier git-rebase.txt: add more details about behavioral differences of backends rebase: allow more types of rebases to fast-forward t3432: make these tests work with either am or merge backends rebase: fix handling of restrict_revision rebase: make sure to pass along the quiet flag to the sequencer rebase, sequencer: remove the broken GIT_QUIET handling t3406: simplify an already simple test rebase (interactive-backend): fix handling of commits that become empty rebase (interactive-backend): make --keep-empty the default t3404: directly test the behavior of interest git-rebase.txt: update description of --allow-empty-message
2020-02-16rebase (interactive-backend): fix handling of commits that become emptyLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+1
As established in the previous commit and commit b00bf1c9a8dd (git-rebase: make --allow-empty-message the default, 2018-06-27), the behavior for rebase with different backends in various edge or corner cases is often more happenstance than design. This commit addresses another such corner case: commits which "become empty". A careful reader may note that there are two types of commits which would become empty due to a rebase: * [clean cherry-pick] Commits which are clean cherry-picks of upstream commits, as determined by `git log --cherry-mark ...`. Re-applying these commits would result in an empty set of changes and a duplicative commit message; i.e. these are commits that have "already been applied" upstream. * [become empty] Commits which are not empty to start, are not clean cherry-picks of upstream commits, but which still become empty after being rebased. This happens e.g. when a commit has changes which are a strict subset of the changes in an upstream commit, or when the changes of a commit can be found spread across or among several upstream commits. Clearly, in both cases the changes in the commit in question are found upstream already, but the commit message may not be in the latter case. When cherry-mark can determine a commit is already upstream, then because of how cherry-mark works this means the upstream commit message was about the *exact* same set of changes. Thus, the commit messages can be assumed to be fully interchangeable (and are in fact likely to be completely identical). As such, the clean cherry-pick case represents a case when there is no information to be gained by keeping the extra commit around. All rebase types have always dropped these commits, and no one to my knowledge has ever requested that we do otherwise. For many of the become empty cases (and likely even most), we will also be able to drop the commit without loss of information -- but this isn't quite always the case. Since these commits represent cases that were not clean cherry-picks, there is no upstream commit message explaining the same set of changes. Projects with good commit message hygiene will likely have the explanation from our commit message contained within or spread among the relevant upstream commits, but not all projects run that way. As such, the commit message of the commit being rebased may have reasoning that suggests additional changes that should be made to adapt to the new base, or it may have information that someone wants to add as a note to another commit, or perhaps someone even wants to create an empty commit with the commit message as-is. Junio commented on the "become-empty" types of commits as follows[1]: WRT a change that ends up being empty (as opposed to a change that is empty from the beginning), I'd think that the current behaviour is desireable one. "am" based rebase is solely to transplant an existing history and want to stop much less than "interactive" one whose purpose is to polish a series before making it publishable, and asking for confirmation ("this has become empty--do you want to drop it?") is more appropriate from the workflow point of view. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqfu1fswdh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/ I would simply add that his arguments for "am"-based rebases actually apply to all non-explicitly-interactive rebases. Also, since we are stating that different cases should have different defaults, it may be worth providing a flag to allow users to select which behavior they want for these commits. Introduce a new command line flag for selecting the desired behavior: --empty={drop,keep,ask} with the definitions: drop: drop commits which become empty keep: keep commits which become empty ask: provide the user a chance to interact and pick what to do with commits which become empty on a case-by-case basis In line with Junio's suggestion, if the --empty flag is not specified, pick defaults as follows: explicitly interactive: ask otherwise: drop Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase (interactive-backend): make --keep-empty the defaultLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
Different rebase backends have different treatment for commits which start empty (i.e. have no changes relative to their parent), and the --keep-empty option was added at some point to allow adjusting behavior. The handling of commits which start empty is actually quite similar to commit b00bf1c9a8dd (git-rebase: make --allow-empty-message the default, 2018-06-27), which pointed out that the behavior for various backends is often more happenstance than design. The specific change made in that commit is actually quite relevant as well and much of the logic there directly applies here. It makes a lot of sense in 'git commit' to error out on the creation of empty commits, unless an override flag is provided. However, once someone determines that there is a rare case that merits using the manual override to create such a commit, it is somewhere between annoying and harmful to have to take extra steps to keep such intentional commits around. Granted, empty commits are quite rare, which is why handling of them doesn't get considered much and folks tend to defer to existing (accidental) behavior and assume there was a reason for it, leading them to just add flags (--keep-empty in this case) that allow them to override the bad defaults. Fix the interactive backend so that --keep-empty is the default, much like we did with --allow-empty-message. The am backend should also be fixed to have --keep-empty semantics for commits that start empty, but that is not included in this patch other than a testcase documenting the failure. Note that there was one test in t3421 which appears to have been written expecting --keep-empty to not be the default as correct behavior. This test was introduced in commit 00b8be5a4d38 ("add tests for rebasing of empty commits", 2013-06-06), which was part of a series focusing on rebase topology and which had an interesting original cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/git/1347949878-12578-1-git-send-email-martinvonz@gmail.com/ which noted Your input especially appreciated on whether you agree with the intent of the test cases. and then went into a long example about how one of the many tests added had several questions about whether it was correct. As such, I believe most the tests in that series were about testing rebase topology with as many different flags as possible and were not trying to state in general how those flags should behave otherwise. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-14Merge branch 'ag/edit-todo-drop-check'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Allow the rebase.missingCommitsCheck configuration to kick in when "rebase --edit-todo" and "rebase --continue" restarts the procedure. * ag/edit-todo-drop-check: rebase-interactive: warn if commit is dropped with `rebase --edit-todo' sequencer: move check_todo_list_from_file() to rebase-interactive.c
2020-02-14Merge branch 'ag/rebase-avoid-unneeded-checkout'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+0
"git rebase -i" (and friends) used to unnecessarily check out the tip of the branch to be rebased, which has been corrected. * ag/rebase-avoid-unneeded-checkout: rebase -i: stop checking out the tip of the branch to rebase
2020-01-28rebase-interactive: warn if commit is dropped with `rebase --edit-todo'Libravatar Alban Gruin1-0/+1
When set to "warn" or "error", `rebase.missingCommitsCheck' would make `rebase -i' warn if the user removed commits from the todo list to prevent mistakes. Unfortunately, `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue' don't take it into account. This adds the ability for `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue' to check if commits were dropped by the user. As both edit_todo_list() and complete_action() parse the todo list and check for dropped commits, the code doing so in the latter is removed to reduce duplication. `edit_todo_list_advice' is removed from sequencer.c as it is no longer used there. This changes when a backup of the todo list is made. Until now, it was saved only once, before the initial edit. Now, it is also made if the original todo list has no errors or no dropped commits. Thus, the backup should be error-free. Without this, sequencer_continue() (`rebase --continue') could only compare the current todo list against the original, unedited list. Before this change, this file was only used by edit_todo_list() and `rebase -p' to create the backup before the initial edit, and check_todo_list_from_file(), only used by `rebase -p' to check for dropped commits after its own initial edit. If the edited list has an error, a file, `dropped', is created to report the issue. Otherwise, it is deleted. Usually, the edited list is compared against the list before editing, but if this file exists, it will be compared to the backup. Also, if the file exists, sequencer_continue() checks the list for dropped commits. If the check was performed every time, it would fail when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, as the backup will contain commits that were picked, but they will not be in the new list. It's safe to ignore this check if `dropped' does not exist, because that means that no errors were found at the last edition, so any missing commits here have already been picked. Five tests are added to t3404. The tests for `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' and `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = error' have a similar structure. First, we start a rebase with an incorrect command on the first line. Then, we edit the todo list, removing the first and the last lines. This demonstrates that `--edit-todo' notices dropped commits, but not when the command is incorrect. Then, we restore the original todo list, and edit it to remove the last line. This demonstrates that if we add a commit after the initial edit, then remove it, `--edit-todo' will notice that it has been dropped. Then, the actual rebase takes place. In the third test, it is also checked that `--continue' will refuse to resume the rebase if commits were dropped. The fourth test checks that no errors are raised when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, the fifth checks that no errors are raised when editing the todo list after pausing the rebase. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-28sequencer: move check_todo_list_from_file() to rebase-interactive.cLibravatar Alban Gruin1-1/+0
The message contained in `edit_todo_list_advice' (sequencer.c) is printed after the initial edit of the todo list if it can't be parsed or if commits were dropped. This is done either in complete_action() for `rebase -i', or in check_todo_list_from_file() for `rebase -p'. Since we want to add this check when editing the list, we also want to use this message from edit_todo_list() (rebase-interactive.c). To this end, check_todo_list_from_file() is moved to rebase-interactive.c, and `edit_todo_list_advice' is copied there. In the next commit, complete_action() will stop using it, and `edit_todo_list_advice' will be removed from sequencer.c. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-24rebase -i: stop checking out the tip of the branch to rebaseLibravatar Alban Gruin1-3/+0
One of the first things done when using a sequencer-based rebase (ie. `rebase -i', `rebase -r', or `rebase -m') is to make a todo list. This requires knowledge of the commit range to rebase. To get the oid of the last commit of the range, the tip of the branch to rebase is checked out with prepare_branch_to_be_rebased(), then the oid of the head is read. After this, the tip of the branch is not even modified. The `am' backend, on the other hand, does not check out the branch. On big repositories, it's a performance penalty: with `rebase -i', the user may have to wait before editing the todo list while git is extracting the branch silently, and "quiet" rebases will be slower than `am'. Since we already have the oid of the tip of the branch in `opts->orig_head', it's useless to switch to this commit. This removes the call to prepare_branch_to_be_rebased() in do_interactive_rebase(), and adds a `orig_head' parameter to get_revision_ranges(). prepare_branch_to_be_rebased() is removed as it is no longer used. This introduces a visible change: as we do not switch on the tip of the branch to rebase, no reflog entry is created at the beginning of the rebase for it. Unscientific performance measurements, performed on linux.git, are as follow: Before this patch: $ time git rebase -m --onto v4.18 463fa44eec2fef50~ 463fa44eec2fef50 real 0m8,940s user 0m6,830s sys 0m2,121s After this patch: $ time git rebase -m --onto v4.18 463fa44eec2fef50~ 463fa44eec2fef50 real 0m1,834s user 0m0,916s sys 0m0,206s Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-12Revert "Merge branch 'ra/rebase-i-more-options'"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
This reverts commit 5d9324e0f4210bb7d52bcb79efe3935703083f72, reversing changes made to c58ae96fc4bb11916b62a96940bb70bb85ea5992. The topic turns out to be too buggy for real use. cf. <f2fe7437-8a48-3315-4d3f-8d51fe4bb8f1@gmail.com>
2019-12-10Merge branch 'ra/rebase-i-more-options'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
"git rebase -i" learned a few options that are known by "git rebase" proper. * ra/rebase-i-more-options: rebase -i: finishing touches to --reset-author-date rebase: add --reset-author-date rebase -i: support --ignore-date sequencer: rename amend_author to author_to_rename rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-date sequencer: allow callers of read_author_script() to ignore fields rebase -i: add --ignore-whitespace flag
2019-12-06commit: encapsulate determine_whence() for sequencerLibravatar Phillip Wood1-1/+2
Working out which command wants to create a commit requires detailed knowledge of the sequencer internals and that knowledge is going to increase in subsequent commits. With that in mind lets encapsulate that knowledge in sequencer.c rather than spreading it into builtin/commit.c. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Merge branch 'pw/post-commit-from-sequencer'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
"rebase -i" ceased to run post-commit hook by mistake in an earlier update, which has been corrected. * pw/post-commit-from-sequencer: sequencer: run post-commit hook move run_commit_hook() to libgit and use it there sequencer.h fix placement of #endif t3404: remove uneeded calls to set_fake_editor t3404: set $EDITOR in subshell t3404: remove unnecessary subshell
2019-11-02rebase -i: support --ignore-dateLibravatar Rohit Ashiwal1-0/+1
rebase am already has this flag to "lie" about the author date by changing it to the committer (current) date. Let's add the same for interactive machinery. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-02rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-dateLibravatar Rohit Ashiwal1-0/+1
rebase am already has this flag to "lie" about the committer date by changing it to the author date. Let's add the same for interactive machinery. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-16sequencer.h fix placement of #endifLibravatar Phillip Wood1-2/+1
Commit 65850686cf ("rebase -i: rewrite write_basic_state() in C", 2018-08-28) accidentially added new function declarations after the #endif at the end of the include guard. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-18Merge branch 'js/rebase-r-strategy'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
"git rebase --rebase-merges" learned to drive different merge strategies and pass strategy specific options to them. * js/rebase-r-strategy: t3427: accelerate this test by using fast-export and fast-import rebase -r: do not (re-)generate root commits with `--root` *and* `--onto` t3418: test `rebase -r` with merge strategies t/lib-rebase: prepare for testing `git rebase --rebase-merges` rebase -r: support merge strategies other than `recursive` t3427: fix another incorrect assumption t3427: accommodate for the `rebase --merge` backend having been replaced t3427: fix erroneous assumption t3427: condense the unnecessarily repetitive test cases into three t3427: move the `filter-branch` invocation into the `setup` case t3427: simplify the `setup` test case significantly t3427: add a clarifying comment rebase: fold git-rebase--common into the -p backend sequencer: the `am` and `rebase--interactive` scripts are gone .gitignore: there is no longer a built-in `git-rebase--interactive` t3400: stop referring to the scripted rebase Drop unused git-rebase--am.sh
2019-07-31rebase -r: do not (re-)generate root commits with `--root` *and* `--onto`Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+6
When rebasing a complete commit history onto a given commit, it is pretty obvious that the root commits should be rebased on top of said given commit. To test this, let's kill two birds with one stone and add a test case to t3427-rebase-subtree.sh that not only demonstrates that this works, but also that `git rebase -r` works with merge strategies now. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-19Merge branch 'ra/cherry-pick-revert-skip'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
"git cherry-pick/revert" learned a new "--skip" action. * ra/cherry-pick-revert-skip: cherry-pick/revert: advise using --skip cherry-pick/revert: add --skip option sequencer: use argv_array in reset_merge sequencer: rename reset_for_rollback to reset_merge sequencer: add advice for revert
2019-07-09Merge branch 'nd/switch-and-restore'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Two new commands "git switch" and "git restore" are introduced to split "checking out a branch to work on advancing its history" and "checking out paths out of the index and/or a tree-ish to work on advancing the current history" out of the single "git checkout" command. * nd/switch-and-restore: (46 commits) completion: disable dwim on "git switch -d" switch: allow to switch in the middle of bisect t2027: use test_must_be_empty Declare both git-switch and git-restore experimental help: move git-diff and git-reset to different groups doc: promote "git restore" user-manual.txt: prefer 'merge --abort' over 'reset --hard' completion: support restore t: add tests for restore restore: support --patch restore: replace --force with --ignore-unmerged restore: default to --source=HEAD when only --staged is specified restore: reject invalid combinations with --staged restore: add --worktree and --staged checkout: factor out worktree checkout code restore: disable overlay mode by default restore: make pathspec mandatory restore: take tree-ish from --source option instead checkout: split part of it to new command 'restore' doc: promote "git switch" ...
2019-07-02cherry-pick/revert: add --skip optionLibravatar Rohit Ashiwal1-0/+1
git am or rebase have a --skip flag to skip the current commit if the user wishes to do so. During a cherry-pick or revert a user could likewise skip a commit, but needs to use 'git reset' (or in the case of conflicts 'git reset --merge'), followed by 'git (cherry-pick | revert) --continue' to skip the commit. This is more annoying and sometimes confusing on the users' part. Add a `--skip` option to make skipping commits easier for the user and to make the commands more consistent. In the next commit, we will change the advice messages hence finishing the process of teaching revert and cherry-pick "how to skip commits". Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-13Merge branch 'pw/clean-sequencer-state-upon-final-commit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
"git chery-pick" (and "revert" that shares the same runtime engine) that deals with multiple commits got confused when the final step gets stopped with a conflict and the user concluded the sequence with "git commit". Attempt to fix it by cleaning up the state files used by these commands in such a situation. * pw/clean-sequencer-state-upon-final-commit: fix cherry-pick/revert status after commit commit/reset: try to clean up sequencer state
2019-05-13Merge branch 'pw/rebase-i-internal'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+4
The internal implementation of "git rebase -i" has been updated to avoid forking a separate "rebase--interactive" process. * pw/rebase-i-internal: rebase -i: run without forking rebase--interactive rebase: use a common action enum rebase -i: use struct rebase_options in do_interactive_rebase() rebase -i: use struct rebase_options to parse args rebase -i: use struct object_id for squash_onto rebase -i: use struct commit when parsing options rebase -i: remove duplication rebase -i: combine rebase--interactive.c with rebase.c rebase: use OPT_RERERE_AUTOUPDATE() rebase: rename write_basic_state() rebase: don't translate trace strings sequencer: always discard index after checkout
2019-05-09Merge branch 'dl/merge-cleanup-scissors-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+8
The list of conflicted paths shown in the editor while concluding a conflicted merge was shown above the scissors line when the clean-up mode is set to "scissors", even though it was commented out just like the list of updated paths and other information to help the user explain the merge better. * dl/merge-cleanup-scissors-fix: cherry-pick/revert: add scissors line on merge conflict sequencer.c: save and restore cleanup mode merge: add scissors line on merge conflict merge: cleanup messages like commit parse-options.h: extract common --cleanup option commit: extract cleanup_mode functions to sequencer t7502: clean up style t7604: clean up style t3507: clean up style t7600: clean up style
2019-05-09Merge branch 'pw/sequencer-cleanup-with-signoff-x-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
"git cherry-pick" run with the "-x" or the "--signoff" option used to (and more importantly, ought to) clean up the commit log message with the --cleanup=space option by default, but this has been broken since late 2017. This has been fixed. * pw/sequencer-cleanup-with-signoff-x-fix: sequencer: fix cleanup with --signoff and -x
2019-04-25Merge branch 'ag/sequencer-reduce-rewriting-todo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-17/+64
The scripted version of "git rebase -i" wrote and rewrote the todo list many times during a single step of its operation, and the recent C-rewrite made a faithful conversion of the logic to C. The implementation has been updated to carry necessary information around in-core to avoid rewriting the same file over and over unnecessarily. * ag/sequencer-reduce-rewriting-todo: rebase--interactive: move transform_todo_file() sequencer: use edit_todo_list() in complete_action() rebase-interactive: rewrite edit_todo_list() to handle the initial edit rebase-interactive: append_todo_help() changes rebase-interactive: use todo_list_write_to_file() in edit_todo_list() sequencer: refactor skip_unnecessary_picks() to work on a todo_list rebase--interactive: move rearrange_squash_in_todo_file() rebase--interactive: move sequencer_add_exec_commands() sequencer: change complete_action() to use the refactored functions sequencer: make sequencer_make_script() write its script to a strbuf sequencer: refactor rearrange_squash() to work on a todo_list sequencer: refactor sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list sequencer: refactor check_todo_list() to work on a todo_list sequencer: introduce todo_list_write_to_file() sequencer: refactor transform_todos() to work on a todo_list sequencer: remove the 'arg' field from todo_item sequencer: make the todo_list structure public sequencer: changes in parse_insn_buffer()
2019-04-19rebase -i: use struct commit when parsing optionsLibravatar Phillip Wood1-2/+2
This is in preparation for using `struct rebase_options` when parsing options in cmd_rebase__interactive(). Using a string for onto, restrict_revision and upstream, was a hangover from the scripted version of rebase. The functions that use these variables are updated to take a `struct commit`. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-19sequencer: always discard index after checkoutLibravatar Phillip Wood1-1/+2
As the checkout runs in a separate process our index will be out of date so it should be discarded. The existing callers are not doing this consistently so do it here to avoid the callers having to worry about it. This fixes some test failures that happen if do_interactive_rebase() is called without forking rebase--interactive which we will implement shortly. Running git rebase -i master topic starting on master created empty todo lists because all the commits in topic were marked as cherry-picks. After topic was checked out in prepare_branch_to_be_rebased() the working tree contained the contents from topic but the index contained master and the cache entries were still valid. This meant that diff_populate_filespec() which loads the blobs when calculating patch-id's ended up reading the contents for master from the working tree which actually contained topic. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-19Merge branch 'ag/sequencer-reduce-rewriting-todo' into pw/rebase-i-internalLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-17/+64
* ag/sequencer-reduce-rewriting-todo: rebase--interactive: move transform_todo_file() sequencer: use edit_todo_list() in complete_action() rebase-interactive: rewrite edit_todo_list() to handle the initial edit rebase-interactive: append_todo_help() changes rebase-interactive: use todo_list_write_to_file() in edit_todo_list() sequencer: refactor skip_unnecessary_picks() to work on a todo_list rebase--interactive: move rearrange_squash_in_todo_file() rebase--interactive: move sequencer_add_exec_commands() sequencer: change complete_action() to use the refactored functions sequencer: make sequencer_make_script() write its script to a strbuf sequencer: refactor rearrange_squash() to work on a todo_list sequencer: refactor sequencer_add_exec_commands() to work on a todo_list sequencer: refactor check_todo_list() to work on a todo_list sequencer: introduce todo_list_write_to_file() sequencer: refactor transform_todos() to work on a todo_list sequencer: remove the 'arg' field from todo_item sequencer: make the todo_list structure public sequencer: changes in parse_insn_buffer()
2019-04-19cherry-pick/revert: add scissors line on merge conflictLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+2
Fix a bug where the scissors line is placed after the Conflicts: section, in the case where a merge conflict occurs and commit.cleanup = scissors. Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>