summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/revision.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-02-03Merge branch 'nd/diff-with-path-params'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
A few options of "git diff" did not work well when the command was run from a subdirectory. * nd/diff-with-path-params: diff: make -O and --output work in subdirectory diff-no-index: do not take a redundant prefix argument
2016-01-21diff: make -O and --output work in subdirectoryLibravatar Duy Nguyen1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-01-15revision: read --stdin with strbuf_getline()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+2
Reading with getwholeline() and manually stripping the terminating '\n' would leave CR at the end of the line if the input comes from a DOS editor. Constrasting this with the other changes around "--stdin" in this series, one may realize that the way "log" family of commands read the paths with "--stdin" looks inconsistent and sloppy. It does not allow us to C-quote a textual input, neither does it accept records that are NUL-terminated. These are unfortunately way too late to fix X-<. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-01-04Merge branch 'jk/pending-keep-tag-name' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
History traversal with "git log --source" that starts with an annotated tag failed to report the tag as "source", due to an old regression in the command line parser back in v2.2 days. * jk/pending-keep-tag-name: revision.c: propagate tag names from pending array
2015-12-28Merge branch 'jk/pending-keep-tag-name'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
History traversal with "git log --source" that starts with an annotated tag failed to report the tag as "source", due to an old regression in the command line parser back in v2.2 days. * jk/pending-keep-tag-name: revision.c: propagate tag names from pending array
2015-12-17revision.c: propagate tag names from pending arrayLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+1
When we unwrap a tag to find its commit for a traversal, we do not propagate the "name" field of the tag in the pending array (i.e., the ref name the user gave us in the first place) to the commit (instead, we use an empty string). This means that "git log --source" will never show the tag-name for commits we reach through it. This was broken in 2073949 (traverse_commit_list: support pending blobs/trees with paths, 2014-10-15). That commit tried to be careful and avoid propagating the path information for a tag (which would be nonsensical) to trees and blobs. But it should not have cut off the "name" field, which should carry forward to children. Note that this does mean that the "name" field will carry forward to blobs and trees, too. Whereas prior to 2073949, we always gave them an empty string. This is the right thing to do, but in practice no callers probably use it (since now we have an explicit separate "path" field, which was the point of 2073949). We add tests here not only for the broken case, but also a basic sanity test of "log --source" in general, which did not have any coverage in the test suite. Reported-by: Raymundo <gypark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-11Merge branch 'sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
mark_tree_uninteresting() has code to handle the case where it gets passed a NULL pointer in its 'tree' parameter, but the function had 'object = &tree->object' assignment before checking if tree is NULL. This gives a compiler an excuse to declare that tree will never be NULL and apply a wrong optimization. Avoid it. * sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting: revision.c: fix possible null pointer arithmetic
2015-12-11Merge branch 'rs/pop-commit' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-22/+5
Code simplification. * rs/pop-commit: use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_list
2015-12-11Merge branch 'sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
mark_tree_uninteresting() has code to handle the case where it gets passed a NULL pointer in its 'tree' parameter, but the function had 'object = &tree->object' assignment before checking if tree is NULL. This gives a compiler an excuse to declare that tree will never be NULL and apply a wrong optimization. Avoid it. * sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting: revision.c: fix possible null pointer arithmetic
2015-12-07revision.c: fix possible null pointer arithmeticLibravatar Stefan Naewe1-1/+3
mark_tree_uninteresting() dereferences a tree pointer before checking if the pointer is valid. Fix that by doing the check first. Signed-off-by: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-20Remove get_object_hash.Libravatar brian m. carlson1-8/+8
Convert all instances of get_object_hash to use an appropriate reference to the hash member of the oid member of struct object. This provides no functional change, as it is essentially a macro substitution. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-20Convert struct object to object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-16/+16
struct object is one of the major data structures dealing with object IDs. Convert it to use struct object_id instead of an unsigned char array. Convert get_object_hash to refer to the new member as well. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-20Add several uses of get_object_hash.Libravatar brian m. carlson1-8/+8
Convert most instances where the sha1 member of struct object is dereferenced to use get_object_hash. Most instances that are passed to functions that have versions taking struct object_id, such as get_sha1_hex/get_oid_hex, or instances that can be trivially converted to use struct object_id instead, are not converted. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-10-30Merge branch 'rs/pop-commit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-22/+5
Code simplification. * rs/pop-commit: use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_list
2015-10-26use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_listLibravatar René Scharfe1-22/+5
Instead of open-coding the function pop_commit() just call it. This makes the intent clearer and reduces code size. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-05prefer memcpy to strcpyLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we already know the length of a string (e.g., because we just malloc'd to fit it), it's nicer to use memcpy than strcpy, as it makes it more obvious that we are not going to overflow the buffer (because the size we pass matches the size in the allocation). This also eliminates calls to strcpy, which make auditing the code base harder. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-09-03Merge branch 'jk/log-missing-default-HEAD' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+16
"git init empty && git -C empty log" said "bad default revision 'HEAD'", which was found to be a bit confusing to new users. * jk/log-missing-default-HEAD: log: diagnose empty HEAD more clearly
2015-09-02Merge branch 'jk/log-missing-default-HEAD'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+16
"git init empty && git -C empty log" said "bad default revision 'HEAD'", which was found to be a bit confusing to new users. * jk/log-missing-default-HEAD: log: diagnose empty HEAD more clearly
2015-08-31log: diagnose empty HEAD more clearlyLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+16
If you init or clone an empty repository, the initial message from running "git log" is not very friendly: $ git init Initialized empty Git repository in /home/peff/foo/.git/ $ git log fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' Let's detect this situation and write a more friendly message: $ git log fatal: your current branch 'master' does not have any commits yet We also detect the case that 'HEAD' points to a broken ref; this should be even less common, but is easy to see. Note that we do not diagnose all possible cases. We rely on resolve_ref, which means we do not get information about complex cases. E.g., "--default master" would use dwim_ref to find "refs/heads/master", but we notice only that "master" does not exist. Similarly, a complex sha1 expression like "--default HEAD^2" will not resolve as a ref. But that's OK. We fall back to a generic error message in those cases, and they are unlikely to be used anyway. Catching an empty or broken "HEAD" improves the common case, and the other cases are not regressed. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-12Merge branch 'ad/bisect-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+16
Code and documentation clean-up to "git bisect". * ad/bisect-cleanup: bisect: don't mix option parsing and non-trivial code bisect: simplify the addition of new bisect terms bisect: replace hardcoded "bad|good" by variables Documentation/bisect: revise overall content Documentation/bisect: move getting help section to the end bisect: correction of typo
2015-08-03bisect: simplify the addition of new bisect termsLibravatar Antoine Delaite1-2/+16
We create a file BISECT_TERMS in the repository .git to be read during a bisection. There's no user-interface yet, but "git bisect" works if terms other than old/new or bad/good are set in .git/BISECT_TERMS. The fonctions to be changed if we add new terms are quite few. In git-bisect.sh: check_and_set_terms bisect_voc Co-authored-by: Louis Stuber <stuberl@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Tweaked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Antoine Delaite <antoine.delaite@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Louis Stuber <stuberl@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-03Merge branch 'jk/date-mode-format'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Teach "git log" and friends a new "--date=format:..." option to format timestamps using system's strftime(3). * jk/date-mode-format: strbuf: make strbuf_addftime more robust introduce "format" date-mode convert "enum date_mode" into a struct show-branch: use DATE_RELATIVE instead of magic number
2015-07-17Merge branch 'jk/still-interesting'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Code clean-up. * jk/still-interesting: revision.c: remove unneeded check for NULL
2015-06-29convert "enum date_mode" into a structLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
In preparation for adding date modes that may carry extra information beyond the mode itself, this patch converts the date_mode enum into a struct. Most of the conversion is fairly straightforward; we pass the struct as a pointer and dereference the type field where necessary. Locations that declare a date_mode can use a "{}" constructor. However, the tricky case is where we use the enum labels as constants, like: show_date(t, tz, DATE_NORMAL); Ideally we could say: show_date(t, tz, &{ DATE_NORMAL }); but of course C does not allow that. Likewise, we cannot cast the constant to a struct, because we need to pass an actual address. Our options are basically: 1. Manually add a "struct date_mode d = { DATE_NORMAL }" definition to each caller, and pass "&d". This makes the callers uglier, because they sometimes do not even have their own scope (e.g., they are inside a switch statement). 2. Provide a pre-made global "date_normal" struct that can be passed by address. We'd also need "date_rfc2822", "date_iso8601", and so forth. But at least the ugliness is defined in one place. 3. Provide a wrapper that generates the correct struct on the fly. The big downside is that we end up pointing to a single global, which makes our wrapper non-reentrant. But show_date is already not reentrant, so it does not matter. This patch implements 3, along with a minor macro to keep the size of the callers sane. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-29revision.c: remove unneeded check for NULLLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+2
The function is called only from one place, which makes sure to have `interesting_cache` not NULL. Additionally the variable is a dereferenced a few lines before unconditionally, which would have resulted in a segmentation fault before hitting this check. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-11Merge branch 'jk/squelch-missing-link-warning-for-unreachable'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Recent "git prune" traverses young unreachable objects to safekeep old objects in the reachability chain from them, which sometimes caused error messages that are unnecessarily alarming. * jk/squelch-missing-link-warning-for-unreachable: suppress errors on missing UNINTERESTING links silence broken link warnings with revs->ignore_missing_links add quieter versions of parse_{tree,commit}
2015-06-01suppress errors on missing UNINTERESTING linksLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we are traversing commit parents along the UNINTERESTING side of a revision walk, we do not care if the parent turns out to be missing. That lets us limit traversals using unreachable and possibly incomplete sections of history. However, we do still print error messages about the missing commits; this patch suppresses the error, as well. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-01silence broken link warnings with revs->ignore_missing_linksLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
We set revs->ignore_missing_links to instruct the revision-walking machinery that we know the history graph may be incomplete. For example, we use it when walking unreachable but recent objects; we want to add what we can, but it's OK if the history is incomplete. However, we still print error messages for the missing objects, which can be confusing. This is not an error, but just a normal situation when transitioning from a repository last pruned by an older git (which can leave broken segments of history) to a more recent one (where we try to preserve whole reachable segments). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-25handle_one_reflog(): rewrite to take an object_id argumentLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+3
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-25handle_one_ref(): rewrite to take an object_id argumentLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-26/+9
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-25each_ref_fn: change to take an object_id parameterLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-6/+27
Change typedef each_ref_fn to take a "const struct object_id *oid" parameter instead of "const unsigned char *sha1". To aid this transition, implement an adapter that can be used to wrap old-style functions matching the old typedef, which is now called "each_ref_sha1_fn"), and make such functions callable via the new interface. This requires the old function and its cb_data to be wrapped in a "struct each_ref_fn_sha1_adapter", and that object to be used as the cb_data for an adapter function, each_ref_fn_adapter(). This is an enormous diff, but most of it consists of simple, mechanical changes to the sites that call any of the "for_each_ref" family of functions. Subsequent to this change, the call sites can be rewritten one by one to use the new interface. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-11Merge branch 'jk/still-interesting'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+19
"git rev-list --objects $old --not --all" to see if everything that is reachable from $old is already connected to the existing refs was very inefficient. * jk/still-interesting: limit_list: avoid quadratic behavior from still_interesting
2015-04-17limit_list: avoid quadratic behavior from still_interestingLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+19
When we are limiting a rev-list traversal due to UNINTERESTING refs, we have to walk down the tips (both interesting and uninteresting) to find where they intersect. We keep a queue of commits to examine, pop commits off the queue one by one, and potentially add their parents. The size of the queue will naturally fluctuate based on the "width" of the history graph; i.e., the number of simultaneous lines of development. But for the most part it will stay in the same ballpark as the initial number of tips we fed, shrinking over time (as we hit common ancestors of the tips). So roughly speaking, if we start with `N` tips, we'll spend much of the time with a queue around `N` items. For each UNINTERESTING commit we pop, we call still_interesting to check whether marking its parents as UNINTERESTING has made the whole queue uninteresting (in which case we can quit early). Because the queue is stored as a linked list, this is `O(N)`, where `N` is the number of items in the queue. So processing a queue with `N` commits marked UNINTERESTING (and one or more interesting commits) will take `O(N^2)`. If you feed a lot of positive tips, this isn't a problem. They aren't UNINTERESTING, so they don't incur the still_interesting check. It also isn't a problem if you traverse from an interesting tip to some UNINTERESTING bases. We order the queue by recency, so the interesting commits stay at the front of the queue as we walk down them. The linear check can exit early as soon as it sees one interesting commit left in the queue. But if you want to know whether an older commit is reachable from a set of newer tips, we end up processing in the opposite direction: from the UNINTERESTING ones down to the interesting one. This may happen when we call: git rev-list $commits --not --all in check_everything_connected after a fetch. If we fetched something much older than most of our refs, and if we have a large number of refs, the traversal cost is dominated by the quadratic behavior. These commands simulate the connectivity check of such a fetch, when you have `$n` distinct refs in the receiver: # positive ref is 100,000 commits deep git rev-list --all | head -100000 | tail -1 >input # huge number of more recent negative refs git rev-list --all | head -$n | sed s/^/^/ >>input time git rev-list --stdin <input Here are timings for various `n` on the linux.git repository. The `n=1` case provides a baseline for just walking the commits, which lets us see the still_interesting overhead. The times marked with `+` subtract that baseline to show just the extra time growth due to the large number of refs. The `x` numbers show the slowdown of the adjusted time versus the prior trial. n | before | after -------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 0.991s | 0.848s 10000 | 1.120s (+0.129s) | 0.885s (+0.037s) 20000 | 1.451s (+0.460s, 3.5x) | 0.923s (+0.075s, 2.0x) 40000 | 2.731s (+1.740s, 3.8x) | 0.994s (+0.146s, 1.9x) 80000 | 8.235s (+7.244s, 4.2x) | 1.123s (+0.275s, 1.9x) Each trial doubles `n`, so you can see the quadratic (`4x`) behavior before this patch. Afterwards, we have a roughly linear relationship. The implementation is fairly straightforward. Whenever we do the linear search, we cache the interesting commit we find, and next time check it before doing another linear search. If that commit is removed from the list or becomes UNINTERESTING itself, then we fall back to the linear search. This is very similar to the trick used by fce87ae (Fix quadratic performance in rewrite_one., 2008-07-12). I considered and rejected several possible alternatives: 1. Keep a count of UNINTERESTING commits in the queue. This requires managing the count not only when removing an item from the queue, but also when marking an item as UNINTERESTING. That requires touching the other functions which mark commits, and would require knowing quickly which commits are in the queue (lookup in the queue is linear, so we would need an auxiliary structure or to also maintain an IN_QUEUE flag in each commit object). 2. Keep a separate list of interesting commits. Drop items from it when they are dropped from the queue, or if they become UNINTERESTING. This again suffers from extra complexity to maintain the list, not to mention CPU and memory. 3. Use a better data structure for the queue. This is something that could help the fix in fce87ae, because we order the queue by recency, and it is about inserting quickly in recency order. So a normal priority queue would help there. But here, we cannot disturb the order of the queue, which makes things harder. We really do need an auxiliary index to track the flag we care about, which is basically option (2) above. The "cache" trick is simple, and the numbers above show that it works well in practice. This is because the length of time it takes to find an interesting commit is proportional to the length of time it will remain cached (i.e., if we have to walk a long way to find it, it also means we have to pop a lot of elements in the queue until we get rid of it and have to find another interesting commit). The worst case is still quadratic, though. We could have `N` uninteresting commits at the front of the queue, followed by `N` interesting commits, where commit `i` has parent `i+N`. When we pop commit `i`, we will notice that the parent of the next commit, `i+1+N` is still interesting and cache it. But then handling commit `i+1`, we will mark its parent `i+1+N` uninteresting, and immediately invalidate our cache. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25Merge branch 'dj/log-graph-with-no-walk'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
"git log --graph --no-walk A B..." is a otcnflicting request that asks nonsense; no-walk tells us show discrete points in the history, while graph asks to draw connections between these discrete points. Forbid the combination. * dj/log-graph-with-no-walk: revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk
2015-03-25Merge branch 'kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
"git rev-list --bisect --first-parent" does not work (yet) and can even cause SEGV; forbid it. "git log --bisect --first-parent" would not be useful until "git bisect --first-parent" materializes, so it is also forbidden for now. * kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent: rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisect
2015-03-19rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisectLibravatar Kevin Daudt1-0/+3
rev-list --bisect is used by git bisect, but never together with --first-parent. Because rev-list --bisect together with --first-parent is not handled currently, and even leads to segfaults, refuse to use both options together. Because this is not supported, it makes little sense to use git log --bisect --first parent either, because refs/heads/bad is not limited to the first parent chain. Helped-by: Junio C. Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-19revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walkLibravatar Dongcan Jiang1-0/+2
Because "--graph" is about connected history while --no-walk is about discrete points, it does not make sense to allow these two options at the same time. [1] This change makes a few calls to "show --graph" fail in t4052, but asking to show one commit with graph is a nonsensical thing to do. Thus, tests on "show --graph" in t4052 have been removed [2,3]. Same tests on "show" without --graph option have already been tested in 4052. 3 testcases have been added to test this patch. [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/216083 [2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/264950 [3]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/265107 Helped-By: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-By: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Helped-By: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Dongcan Jiang <dongcan.jiang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-02-11Merge branch 'jc/unused-symbols'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-51/+55
Mark file-local symbols as "static", and drop functions that nobody uses. * jc/unused-symbols: shallow.c: make check_shallow_file_for_update() static remote.c: make clear_cas_option() static urlmatch.c: make match_urls() static revision.c: make save_parents() and free_saved_parents() static line-log.c: make line_log_data_init() static pack-bitmap.c: make pack_bitmap_filename() static prompt.c: remove git_getpass() nobody uses http.c: make finish_active_slot() and handle_curl_result() static
2015-02-11Merge branch 'cj/log-invert-grep'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
"git log --invert-grep --grep=WIP" will show only commits that do not have the string "WIP" in their messages. * cj/log-invert-grep: log: teach --invert-grep option
2015-01-15revision.c: make save_parents() and free_saved_parents() staticLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-51/+55
No external callers exist. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-13log: teach --invert-grep optionLibravatar Christoph Junghans1-1/+3
"git log --grep=<string>" shows only commits with messages that match the given string, but sometimes it is useful to be able to show only commits that do *not* have certain messages (e.g. "show me ones that are not FIXUP commits"). Originally, we had the invert-grep flag in grep_opt, but because "git grep --invert-grep" does not make sense except in conjunction with "--files-with-matches", which is already covered by "--files-without-matches", it was moved it to revisions structure. To have the flag there expresses the function to the feature better. When the newly inserted two tests run, the history would have commits with messages "initial", "second", "third", "fourth", "fifth", "sixth" and "Second", committed in this order. The commits that does not match either "th" or "Sec" is "second" and "initial". For the case insensitive case only "initial" matches. Signed-off-by: Christoph Junghans <ottxor@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-12Merge branch 'bc/fetch-thin-less-aggressive-in-normal-repository'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
Earlier we made "rev-list --object-edge" more aggressively list the objects at the edge commits, in order to reduce number of objects fetched into a shallow repository, but the change affected cases other than "fetching into a shallow repository" and made it unusably slow (e.g. fetching into a normal repository should not have to suffer the overhead from extra processing). Limit it to a more specific case by introducing --objects-edge-aggressive, a new option to rev-list. * bc/fetch-thin-less-aggressive-in-normal-repository: pack-objects: use --objects-edge-aggressive for shallow repos rev-list: add an option to mark fewer edges as uninteresting Documentation: add missing article in rev-list-options.txt
2015-01-07Merge branch 'jc/merge-bases'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
The get_merge_bases*() API was easy to misuse by careless copy&paste coders, leaving object flags tainted in the commits that needed to be traversed. * jc/merge-bases: get_merge_bases(): always clean-up object flags bisect: clean flags after checking merge bases
2014-12-29rev-list: add an option to mark fewer edges as uninterestingLibravatar brian m. carlson1-0/+6
In commit fbd4a70 (list-objects: mark more commits as edges in mark_edges_uninteresting - 2013-08-16), we marked an increasing number of edges uninteresting. This change, and the subsequent change to make this conditional on --objects-edge, are used by --thin to make much smaller packs for shallow clones. Unfortunately, they cause a significant performance regression when pushing non-shallow clones with lots of refs (23.322 seconds vs. 4.785 seconds with 22400 refs). Add an option to git rev-list, --objects-edge-aggressive, that preserves this more aggressive behavior, while leaving --objects-edge to provide more performant behavior. Preserve the current behavior for the moment by using the aggressive option. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-30get_merge_bases(): always clean-up object flagsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
The callers of get_merge_bases() can choose to leave object flags used during the merge-base traversal by passing cleanup=0 as a parameter, but in practice a very few callers can afford to do so (namely, "git merge-base"), as they need to compute merge base in preparation for other processing of their own and they need to see the object without contaminate flags. Change the function signature of get_merge_bases_many() and get_merge_bases() to drop the cleanup parameter, so that the majority of the callers do not have to say ", 1" at the end. Give a new get_merge_bases_many_dirty() API to support only a few callers that know they do not need to spend cycles cleaning up the object flags. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19revision: remove definition of unused 'add_object' functionLibravatar Ramsay Jones1-10/+0
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19rev-list: add --indexed-objects optionLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+51
There is currently no easy way to ask the revision traversal machinery to include objects reachable from the index (e.g., blobs and trees that have not yet been committed). This patch adds an option to do so. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19traverse_commit_list: support pending blobs/trees with pathsLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+27
When we call traverse_commit_list, we may have trees and blobs in the pending array. As we process these, we pass the "name" field from the pending entry as the path of the object within the tree (which then becomes the root path if we recurse into subtrees). When we set up the traversal in prepare_revision_walk, though, the "name" field of any pending trees and blobs is likely to be the ref at which we found the object. We would not want to make this part of the path (e.g., doing so would make "git rev-list --objects v2.6.11-tree" in linux.git show paths like "v2.6.11-tree/Makefile", which is nonsensical). Therefore prepare_revision_walk sets the name field of each pending tree and blobs to the empty string. However, this leaves no room for a caller who does know the correct path of a pending object to propagate that information to the revision walker. We can fix this by making two related changes: 1. Use the "path" field as the path instead of the "name" field in traverse_commit_list. If the path is not set, default to "" (which is what we always ended up with in the current code, because of prepare_revision_walk). 2. In prepare_revision_walk, make a complete copy of the entry. This makes the path field available to the walker (if there is one), solving our problem. Leaving the name field intact is now OK, as we do not use it as a path due to point (1) above (and we can use it to make more meaningful error messages if we want). We also make the original "mode" field available to the walker, though it does not actually use it. Note that we still re-add the pending objects and free the old ones (so we may strdup the path and name only to free the old ones). This could be made more efficient by simply copying the object_array entries that we are keeping. However, that would require more restructuring of the code, and is not done here. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-16reachable: reuse revision.c "add all reflogs" codeLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
We want to add all reflog entries as tips for finding reachable objects. The revision machinery can already do this (to support "rev-list --reflog"); we can reuse that code. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-16clean up name allocation in prepare_revision_walkLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+7
When we enter prepare_revision_walk, we have zero or more entries in our "pending" array. We disconnect that array from the rev_info, and then process each entry: 1. If the entry is a commit and the --source option is in effect, we keep a pointer to the object name. 2. Otherwise, we re-add the item to the pending list with a blank name. We then throw away the old array by freeing the array itself, but do not touch the "name" field of each entry. For any items of type (2), we leak the memory associated with the name. This commit fixes that by calling object_array_clear, which handles the cleanup for us. That breaks (1), though, because it depends on the memory pointed to by the name to last forever. We can solve that by making a copy of the name. This is slightly less efficient, but it shouldn't matter in practice, as we do it only for the tip commits of the traversal. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>