summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/revision.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-01-04Merge branch 'jk/pending-keep-tag-name' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
History traversal with "git log --source" that starts with an annotated tag failed to report the tag as "source", due to an old regression in the command line parser back in v2.2 days. * jk/pending-keep-tag-name: revision.c: propagate tag names from pending array
2015-12-17revision.c: propagate tag names from pending arrayLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+1
When we unwrap a tag to find its commit for a traversal, we do not propagate the "name" field of the tag in the pending array (i.e., the ref name the user gave us in the first place) to the commit (instead, we use an empty string). This means that "git log --source" will never show the tag-name for commits we reach through it. This was broken in 2073949 (traverse_commit_list: support pending blobs/trees with paths, 2014-10-15). That commit tried to be careful and avoid propagating the path information for a tag (which would be nonsensical) to trees and blobs. But it should not have cut off the "name" field, which should carry forward to children. Note that this does mean that the "name" field will carry forward to blobs and trees, too. Whereas prior to 2073949, we always gave them an empty string. This is the right thing to do, but in practice no callers probably use it (since now we have an explicit separate "path" field, which was the point of 2073949). We add tests here not only for the broken case, but also a basic sanity test of "log --source" in general, which did not have any coverage in the test suite. Reported-by: Raymundo <gypark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-11Merge branch 'sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
mark_tree_uninteresting() has code to handle the case where it gets passed a NULL pointer in its 'tree' parameter, but the function had 'object = &tree->object' assignment before checking if tree is NULL. This gives a compiler an excuse to declare that tree will never be NULL and apply a wrong optimization. Avoid it. * sn/null-pointer-arith-in-mark-tree-uninteresting: revision.c: fix possible null pointer arithmetic
2015-12-11Merge branch 'rs/pop-commit' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-22/+5
Code simplification. * rs/pop-commit: use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_list
2015-12-07revision.c: fix possible null pointer arithmeticLibravatar Stefan Naewe1-1/+3
mark_tree_uninteresting() dereferences a tree pointer before checking if the pointer is valid. Fix that by doing the check first. Signed-off-by: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-26use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_listLibravatar René Scharfe1-22/+5
Instead of open-coding the function pop_commit() just call it. This makes the intent clearer and reduces code size. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-09-03Merge branch 'jk/log-missing-default-HEAD' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+16
"git init empty && git -C empty log" said "bad default revision 'HEAD'", which was found to be a bit confusing to new users. * jk/log-missing-default-HEAD: log: diagnose empty HEAD more clearly
2015-09-02Merge branch 'jk/log-missing-default-HEAD'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+16
"git init empty && git -C empty log" said "bad default revision 'HEAD'", which was found to be a bit confusing to new users. * jk/log-missing-default-HEAD: log: diagnose empty HEAD more clearly
2015-08-31log: diagnose empty HEAD more clearlyLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+16
If you init or clone an empty repository, the initial message from running "git log" is not very friendly: $ git init Initialized empty Git repository in /home/peff/foo/.git/ $ git log fatal: bad default revision 'HEAD' Let's detect this situation and write a more friendly message: $ git log fatal: your current branch 'master' does not have any commits yet We also detect the case that 'HEAD' points to a broken ref; this should be even less common, but is easy to see. Note that we do not diagnose all possible cases. We rely on resolve_ref, which means we do not get information about complex cases. E.g., "--default master" would use dwim_ref to find "refs/heads/master", but we notice only that "master" does not exist. Similarly, a complex sha1 expression like "--default HEAD^2" will not resolve as a ref. But that's OK. We fall back to a generic error message in those cases, and they are unlikely to be used anyway. Catching an empty or broken "HEAD" improves the common case, and the other cases are not regressed. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-12Merge branch 'ad/bisect-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+16
Code and documentation clean-up to "git bisect". * ad/bisect-cleanup: bisect: don't mix option parsing and non-trivial code bisect: simplify the addition of new bisect terms bisect: replace hardcoded "bad|good" by variables Documentation/bisect: revise overall content Documentation/bisect: move getting help section to the end bisect: correction of typo
2015-08-03bisect: simplify the addition of new bisect termsLibravatar Antoine Delaite1-2/+16
We create a file BISECT_TERMS in the repository .git to be read during a bisection. There's no user-interface yet, but "git bisect" works if terms other than old/new or bad/good are set in .git/BISECT_TERMS. The fonctions to be changed if we add new terms are quite few. In git-bisect.sh: check_and_set_terms bisect_voc Co-authored-by: Louis Stuber <stuberl@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Tweaked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Antoine Delaite <antoine.delaite@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Louis Stuber <stuberl@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-03Merge branch 'jk/date-mode-format'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Teach "git log" and friends a new "--date=format:..." option to format timestamps using system's strftime(3). * jk/date-mode-format: strbuf: make strbuf_addftime more robust introduce "format" date-mode convert "enum date_mode" into a struct show-branch: use DATE_RELATIVE instead of magic number
2015-07-17Merge branch 'jk/still-interesting'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Code clean-up. * jk/still-interesting: revision.c: remove unneeded check for NULL
2015-06-29convert "enum date_mode" into a structLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
In preparation for adding date modes that may carry extra information beyond the mode itself, this patch converts the date_mode enum into a struct. Most of the conversion is fairly straightforward; we pass the struct as a pointer and dereference the type field where necessary. Locations that declare a date_mode can use a "{}" constructor. However, the tricky case is where we use the enum labels as constants, like: show_date(t, tz, DATE_NORMAL); Ideally we could say: show_date(t, tz, &{ DATE_NORMAL }); but of course C does not allow that. Likewise, we cannot cast the constant to a struct, because we need to pass an actual address. Our options are basically: 1. Manually add a "struct date_mode d = { DATE_NORMAL }" definition to each caller, and pass "&d". This makes the callers uglier, because they sometimes do not even have their own scope (e.g., they are inside a switch statement). 2. Provide a pre-made global "date_normal" struct that can be passed by address. We'd also need "date_rfc2822", "date_iso8601", and so forth. But at least the ugliness is defined in one place. 3. Provide a wrapper that generates the correct struct on the fly. The big downside is that we end up pointing to a single global, which makes our wrapper non-reentrant. But show_date is already not reentrant, so it does not matter. This patch implements 3, along with a minor macro to keep the size of the callers sane. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-29revision.c: remove unneeded check for NULLLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+2
The function is called only from one place, which makes sure to have `interesting_cache` not NULL. Additionally the variable is a dereferenced a few lines before unconditionally, which would have resulted in a segmentation fault before hitting this check. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-11Merge branch 'jk/squelch-missing-link-warning-for-unreachable'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Recent "git prune" traverses young unreachable objects to safekeep old objects in the reachability chain from them, which sometimes caused error messages that are unnecessarily alarming. * jk/squelch-missing-link-warning-for-unreachable: suppress errors on missing UNINTERESTING links silence broken link warnings with revs->ignore_missing_links add quieter versions of parse_{tree,commit}
2015-06-01suppress errors on missing UNINTERESTING linksLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we are traversing commit parents along the UNINTERESTING side of a revision walk, we do not care if the parent turns out to be missing. That lets us limit traversals using unreachable and possibly incomplete sections of history. However, we do still print error messages about the missing commits; this patch suppresses the error, as well. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-01silence broken link warnings with revs->ignore_missing_linksLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
We set revs->ignore_missing_links to instruct the revision-walking machinery that we know the history graph may be incomplete. For example, we use it when walking unreachable but recent objects; we want to add what we can, but it's OK if the history is incomplete. However, we still print error messages for the missing objects, which can be confusing. This is not an error, but just a normal situation when transitioning from a repository last pruned by an older git (which can leave broken segments of history) to a more recent one (where we try to preserve whole reachable segments). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-25handle_one_reflog(): rewrite to take an object_id argumentLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+3
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-25handle_one_ref(): rewrite to take an object_id argumentLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-26/+9
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-25each_ref_fn: change to take an object_id parameterLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-6/+27
Change typedef each_ref_fn to take a "const struct object_id *oid" parameter instead of "const unsigned char *sha1". To aid this transition, implement an adapter that can be used to wrap old-style functions matching the old typedef, which is now called "each_ref_sha1_fn"), and make such functions callable via the new interface. This requires the old function and its cb_data to be wrapped in a "struct each_ref_fn_sha1_adapter", and that object to be used as the cb_data for an adapter function, each_ref_fn_adapter(). This is an enormous diff, but most of it consists of simple, mechanical changes to the sites that call any of the "for_each_ref" family of functions. Subsequent to this change, the call sites can be rewritten one by one to use the new interface. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-11Merge branch 'jk/still-interesting'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+19
"git rev-list --objects $old --not --all" to see if everything that is reachable from $old is already connected to the existing refs was very inefficient. * jk/still-interesting: limit_list: avoid quadratic behavior from still_interesting
2015-04-17limit_list: avoid quadratic behavior from still_interestingLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+19
When we are limiting a rev-list traversal due to UNINTERESTING refs, we have to walk down the tips (both interesting and uninteresting) to find where they intersect. We keep a queue of commits to examine, pop commits off the queue one by one, and potentially add their parents. The size of the queue will naturally fluctuate based on the "width" of the history graph; i.e., the number of simultaneous lines of development. But for the most part it will stay in the same ballpark as the initial number of tips we fed, shrinking over time (as we hit common ancestors of the tips). So roughly speaking, if we start with `N` tips, we'll spend much of the time with a queue around `N` items. For each UNINTERESTING commit we pop, we call still_interesting to check whether marking its parents as UNINTERESTING has made the whole queue uninteresting (in which case we can quit early). Because the queue is stored as a linked list, this is `O(N)`, where `N` is the number of items in the queue. So processing a queue with `N` commits marked UNINTERESTING (and one or more interesting commits) will take `O(N^2)`. If you feed a lot of positive tips, this isn't a problem. They aren't UNINTERESTING, so they don't incur the still_interesting check. It also isn't a problem if you traverse from an interesting tip to some UNINTERESTING bases. We order the queue by recency, so the interesting commits stay at the front of the queue as we walk down them. The linear check can exit early as soon as it sees one interesting commit left in the queue. But if you want to know whether an older commit is reachable from a set of newer tips, we end up processing in the opposite direction: from the UNINTERESTING ones down to the interesting one. This may happen when we call: git rev-list $commits --not --all in check_everything_connected after a fetch. If we fetched something much older than most of our refs, and if we have a large number of refs, the traversal cost is dominated by the quadratic behavior. These commands simulate the connectivity check of such a fetch, when you have `$n` distinct refs in the receiver: # positive ref is 100,000 commits deep git rev-list --all | head -100000 | tail -1 >input # huge number of more recent negative refs git rev-list --all | head -$n | sed s/^/^/ >>input time git rev-list --stdin <input Here are timings for various `n` on the linux.git repository. The `n=1` case provides a baseline for just walking the commits, which lets us see the still_interesting overhead. The times marked with `+` subtract that baseline to show just the extra time growth due to the large number of refs. The `x` numbers show the slowdown of the adjusted time versus the prior trial. n | before | after -------------------------------------------------------- 1 | 0.991s | 0.848s 10000 | 1.120s (+0.129s) | 0.885s (+0.037s) 20000 | 1.451s (+0.460s, 3.5x) | 0.923s (+0.075s, 2.0x) 40000 | 2.731s (+1.740s, 3.8x) | 0.994s (+0.146s, 1.9x) 80000 | 8.235s (+7.244s, 4.2x) | 1.123s (+0.275s, 1.9x) Each trial doubles `n`, so you can see the quadratic (`4x`) behavior before this patch. Afterwards, we have a roughly linear relationship. The implementation is fairly straightforward. Whenever we do the linear search, we cache the interesting commit we find, and next time check it before doing another linear search. If that commit is removed from the list or becomes UNINTERESTING itself, then we fall back to the linear search. This is very similar to the trick used by fce87ae (Fix quadratic performance in rewrite_one., 2008-07-12). I considered and rejected several possible alternatives: 1. Keep a count of UNINTERESTING commits in the queue. This requires managing the count not only when removing an item from the queue, but also when marking an item as UNINTERESTING. That requires touching the other functions which mark commits, and would require knowing quickly which commits are in the queue (lookup in the queue is linear, so we would need an auxiliary structure or to also maintain an IN_QUEUE flag in each commit object). 2. Keep a separate list of interesting commits. Drop items from it when they are dropped from the queue, or if they become UNINTERESTING. This again suffers from extra complexity to maintain the list, not to mention CPU and memory. 3. Use a better data structure for the queue. This is something that could help the fix in fce87ae, because we order the queue by recency, and it is about inserting quickly in recency order. So a normal priority queue would help there. But here, we cannot disturb the order of the queue, which makes things harder. We really do need an auxiliary index to track the flag we care about, which is basically option (2) above. The "cache" trick is simple, and the numbers above show that it works well in practice. This is because the length of time it takes to find an interesting commit is proportional to the length of time it will remain cached (i.e., if we have to walk a long way to find it, it also means we have to pop a lot of elements in the queue until we get rid of it and have to find another interesting commit). The worst case is still quadratic, though. We could have `N` uninteresting commits at the front of the queue, followed by `N` interesting commits, where commit `i` has parent `i+N`. When we pop commit `i`, we will notice that the parent of the next commit, `i+1+N` is still interesting and cache it. But then handling commit `i+1`, we will mark its parent `i+1+N` uninteresting, and immediately invalidate our cache. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25Merge branch 'dj/log-graph-with-no-walk'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
"git log --graph --no-walk A B..." is a otcnflicting request that asks nonsense; no-walk tells us show discrete points in the history, while graph asks to draw connections between these discrete points. Forbid the combination. * dj/log-graph-with-no-walk: revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk
2015-03-25Merge branch 'kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
"git rev-list --bisect --first-parent" does not work (yet) and can even cause SEGV; forbid it. "git log --bisect --first-parent" would not be useful until "git bisect --first-parent" materializes, so it is also forbidden for now. * kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent: rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisect
2015-03-19rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisectLibravatar Kevin Daudt1-0/+3
rev-list --bisect is used by git bisect, but never together with --first-parent. Because rev-list --bisect together with --first-parent is not handled currently, and even leads to segfaults, refuse to use both options together. Because this is not supported, it makes little sense to use git log --bisect --first parent either, because refs/heads/bad is not limited to the first parent chain. Helped-by: Junio C. Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Daudt <me@ikke.info> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-19revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walkLibravatar Dongcan Jiang1-0/+2
Because "--graph" is about connected history while --no-walk is about discrete points, it does not make sense to allow these two options at the same time. [1] This change makes a few calls to "show --graph" fail in t4052, but asking to show one commit with graph is a nonsensical thing to do. Thus, tests on "show --graph" in t4052 have been removed [2,3]. Same tests on "show" without --graph option have already been tested in 4052. 3 testcases have been added to test this patch. [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/216083 [2]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/264950 [3]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/265107 Helped-By: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-By: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Helped-By: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Dongcan Jiang <dongcan.jiang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-02-11Merge branch 'jc/unused-symbols'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-51/+55
Mark file-local symbols as "static", and drop functions that nobody uses. * jc/unused-symbols: shallow.c: make check_shallow_file_for_update() static remote.c: make clear_cas_option() static urlmatch.c: make match_urls() static revision.c: make save_parents() and free_saved_parents() static line-log.c: make line_log_data_init() static pack-bitmap.c: make pack_bitmap_filename() static prompt.c: remove git_getpass() nobody uses http.c: make finish_active_slot() and handle_curl_result() static
2015-02-11Merge branch 'cj/log-invert-grep'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
"git log --invert-grep --grep=WIP" will show only commits that do not have the string "WIP" in their messages. * cj/log-invert-grep: log: teach --invert-grep option
2015-01-15revision.c: make save_parents() and free_saved_parents() staticLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-51/+55
No external callers exist. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-13log: teach --invert-grep optionLibravatar Christoph Junghans1-1/+3
"git log --grep=<string>" shows only commits with messages that match the given string, but sometimes it is useful to be able to show only commits that do *not* have certain messages (e.g. "show me ones that are not FIXUP commits"). Originally, we had the invert-grep flag in grep_opt, but because "git grep --invert-grep" does not make sense except in conjunction with "--files-with-matches", which is already covered by "--files-without-matches", it was moved it to revisions structure. To have the flag there expresses the function to the feature better. When the newly inserted two tests run, the history would have commits with messages "initial", "second", "third", "fourth", "fifth", "sixth" and "Second", committed in this order. The commits that does not match either "th" or "Sec" is "second" and "initial". For the case insensitive case only "initial" matches. Signed-off-by: Christoph Junghans <ottxor@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-12Merge branch 'bc/fetch-thin-less-aggressive-in-normal-repository'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
Earlier we made "rev-list --object-edge" more aggressively list the objects at the edge commits, in order to reduce number of objects fetched into a shallow repository, but the change affected cases other than "fetching into a shallow repository" and made it unusably slow (e.g. fetching into a normal repository should not have to suffer the overhead from extra processing). Limit it to a more specific case by introducing --objects-edge-aggressive, a new option to rev-list. * bc/fetch-thin-less-aggressive-in-normal-repository: pack-objects: use --objects-edge-aggressive for shallow repos rev-list: add an option to mark fewer edges as uninteresting Documentation: add missing article in rev-list-options.txt
2015-01-07Merge branch 'jc/merge-bases'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
The get_merge_bases*() API was easy to misuse by careless copy&paste coders, leaving object flags tainted in the commits that needed to be traversed. * jc/merge-bases: get_merge_bases(): always clean-up object flags bisect: clean flags after checking merge bases
2014-12-29rev-list: add an option to mark fewer edges as uninterestingLibravatar brian m. carlson1-0/+6
In commit fbd4a70 (list-objects: mark more commits as edges in mark_edges_uninteresting - 2013-08-16), we marked an increasing number of edges uninteresting. This change, and the subsequent change to make this conditional on --objects-edge, are used by --thin to make much smaller packs for shallow clones. Unfortunately, they cause a significant performance regression when pushing non-shallow clones with lots of refs (23.322 seconds vs. 4.785 seconds with 22400 refs). Add an option to git rev-list, --objects-edge-aggressive, that preserves this more aggressive behavior, while leaving --objects-edge to provide more performant behavior. Preserve the current behavior for the moment by using the aggressive option. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-30get_merge_bases(): always clean-up object flagsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
The callers of get_merge_bases() can choose to leave object flags used during the merge-base traversal by passing cleanup=0 as a parameter, but in practice a very few callers can afford to do so (namely, "git merge-base"), as they need to compute merge base in preparation for other processing of their own and they need to see the object without contaminate flags. Change the function signature of get_merge_bases_many() and get_merge_bases() to drop the cleanup parameter, so that the majority of the callers do not have to say ", 1" at the end. Give a new get_merge_bases_many_dirty() API to support only a few callers that know they do not need to spend cycles cleaning up the object flags. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19revision: remove definition of unused 'add_object' functionLibravatar Ramsay Jones1-10/+0
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19rev-list: add --indexed-objects optionLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+51
There is currently no easy way to ask the revision traversal machinery to include objects reachable from the index (e.g., blobs and trees that have not yet been committed). This patch adds an option to do so. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-19traverse_commit_list: support pending blobs/trees with pathsLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+27
When we call traverse_commit_list, we may have trees and blobs in the pending array. As we process these, we pass the "name" field from the pending entry as the path of the object within the tree (which then becomes the root path if we recurse into subtrees). When we set up the traversal in prepare_revision_walk, though, the "name" field of any pending trees and blobs is likely to be the ref at which we found the object. We would not want to make this part of the path (e.g., doing so would make "git rev-list --objects v2.6.11-tree" in linux.git show paths like "v2.6.11-tree/Makefile", which is nonsensical). Therefore prepare_revision_walk sets the name field of each pending tree and blobs to the empty string. However, this leaves no room for a caller who does know the correct path of a pending object to propagate that information to the revision walker. We can fix this by making two related changes: 1. Use the "path" field as the path instead of the "name" field in traverse_commit_list. If the path is not set, default to "" (which is what we always ended up with in the current code, because of prepare_revision_walk). 2. In prepare_revision_walk, make a complete copy of the entry. This makes the path field available to the walker (if there is one), solving our problem. Leaving the name field intact is now OK, as we do not use it as a path due to point (1) above (and we can use it to make more meaningful error messages if we want). We also make the original "mode" field available to the walker, though it does not actually use it. Note that we still re-add the pending objects and free the old ones (so we may strdup the path and name only to free the old ones). This could be made more efficient by simply copying the object_array entries that we are keeping. However, that would require more restructuring of the code, and is not done here. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-16reachable: reuse revision.c "add all reflogs" codeLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
We want to add all reflog entries as tips for finding reachable objects. The revision machinery can already do this (to support "rev-list --reflog"); we can reuse that code. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-16clean up name allocation in prepare_revision_walkLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+7
When we enter prepare_revision_walk, we have zero or more entries in our "pending" array. We disconnect that array from the rev_info, and then process each entry: 1. If the entry is a commit and the --source option is in effect, we keep a pointer to the object name. 2. Otherwise, we re-add the item to the pending list with a blank name. We then throw away the old array by freeing the array itself, but do not touch the "name" field of each entry. For any items of type (2), we leak the memory associated with the name. This commit fixes that by calling object_array_clear, which handles the cleanup for us. That breaks (1), though, because it depends on the memory pointed to by the name to last forever. We can solve that by making a copy of the name. This is slightly less efficient, but it shouldn't matter in practice, as we do it only for the tip commits of the traversal. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-18use REALLOC_ARRAY for changing the allocation size of arraysLibravatar René Scharfe1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-11Merge branch 'jk/name-decoration-alloc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The API to allocate the structure to keep track of commit decoration was cumbersome to use, inviting lazy code to overallocate memory. * jk/name-decoration-alloc: log-tree: use FLEX_ARRAY in name_decoration log-tree: make name_decoration hash static log-tree: make add_name_decoration a public function
2014-08-26log-tree: make name_decoration hash staticLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
In the previous commit, we made add_name_decoration global so that adders would not have to access the hash directly. We now make the hash itself static so that callers _have_ to add through our function, making sure that all additions go through a single point. To do this, we have to add one more accessor function: a way to lookup entries in the hash. Since the only caller doesn't actually look at the returned value, but rather only asks whether there is a decoration or not, we could provide only a boolean "has_name_decoration". That would allow us to make "struct name_decoration" local to log-tree, as well. However, it's unlikely to cause any maintainability harm making the actual data public, and this interface is more flexible if we need to look at decorations from other parts of the code in the future. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-30revision: drop useless string offset when parsing "--pretty"Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Once upon a time, we parsed pretty options by looking for "--pretty" at the start of the string, and then feeding the rest (including an "=") to get_commit_format. Later, commit 48ded91 (log --pretty: do not accept bogus "--prettyshort", 2008-05-25) split this into a separate check for "--pretty" versus "--pretty=". However, when parsing "--pretty", we still passed "arg+8" to get_commit_format. This is useless, since it will always point to the NUL terminator at the end of the string. We can simply pass NULL instead; both parameters are treated the same by get_commit_format. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16Merge branch 'jk/commit-buffer-length' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+11
A handful of code paths had to read the commit object more than once when showing header fields that are usually not parsed. The internal data structure to keep track of the contents of the commit object has been updated to reduce the need for this double-reading, and to allow the caller find the length of the object. * jk/commit-buffer-length: reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures commit: record buffer length in cache commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab commit-slab: provide a static initializer use get_commit_buffer everywhere convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate provide helpers to access the commit buffer provide a helper to set the commit buffer provide a helper to free commit buffer sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message logmsg_reencode: return const buffer do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
2014-07-02Merge branch 'jk/commit-buffer-length'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+11
Move "commit->buffer" out of the in-core commit object and keep track of their lengths. Use this to optimize the code paths to validate GPG signatures in commit objects. * jk/commit-buffer-length: reuse cached commit buffer when parsing signatures commit: record buffer length in cache commit: convert commit->buffer to a slab commit-slab: provide a static initializer use get_commit_buffer everywhere convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_buffer use get_commit_buffer to avoid duplicate code use get_cached_commit_buffer where appropriate provide helpers to access the commit buffer provide a helper to set the commit buffer provide a helper to free commit buffer sequencer: use logmsg_reencode in get_message logmsg_reencode: return const buffer do not create "struct commit" with xcalloc commit: push commit_index update into alloc_commit_node alloc: include any-object allocations in alloc_report replace dangerous uses of strbuf_attach commit_tree: take a pointer/len pair rather than a const strbuf
2014-06-25Merge branch 'jc/shortlog-ref-exclude' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
"git log --exclude=<glob> --all | git shortlog" worked as expected, but "git shortlog --exclude=<glob> --all", which is supposed to be identical to the above pipeline, was not accepted at the command line argument parser level. * jc/shortlog-ref-exclude: shortlog: allow --exclude=<glob> to be passed
2014-06-25Merge branch 'jc/revision-dash-count-parsing' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
"git log -2master" is a common typo that shows two commits starting from whichever random branch that is not 'master' that happens to be checked out currently. * jc/revision-dash-count-parsing: revision: parse "git log -<count>" more carefully
2014-06-20Merge branch 'jc/revision-dash-count-parsing'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
"git log -2master" is a common typo that shows two commits starting from whichever random branch that is not 'master' that happens to be checked out currently. * jc/revision-dash-count-parsing: revision: parse "git log -<count>" more carefully
2014-06-13convert logmsg_reencode to get_commit_bufferLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Like the callsites in the previous commit, logmsg_reencode already falls back to read_sha1_file when necessary. However, I split its conversion out into its own commit because it's a bit more complex. We return either: 1. The original commit->buffer 2. A newly allocated buffer from read_sha1_file 3. A reencoded buffer (based on either 1 or 2 above). while trying to do as few extra reads/allocations as possible. Callers currently free the result with logmsg_free, but we can simplify this by pointing them straight to unuse_commit_buffer. This is a slight layering violation, in that we may be passing a buffer from (3). However, since the end result is to free() anything except (1), which is unlikely to change, and because this makes the interface much simpler, it's a reasonable bending of the rules. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>