summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/remote-curl.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-10-14remote-curl: rewrite base url from info/refs redirectsLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+4
For efficiency and security reasons, an earlier commit in this series taught http_get_* to re-write the base url based on redirections we saw while making a specific request. This commit wires that option into the info/refs request, meaning that a redirect from http://example.com/foo.git/info/refs to https://example.com/bar.git/info/refs will behave as if "https://example.com/bar.git" had been provided to git in the first place. The tests bear some explanation. We introduce two new hierearchies into the httpd test config: 1. Requests to /smart-redir-limited will work only for the initial info/refs request, but not any subsequent requests. As a result, we can confirm whether the client is re-rooting its requests after the initial contact, since otherwise it will fail (it will ask for "repo.git/git-upload-pack", which is not redirected). 2. Requests to smart-redir-auth will redirect, and require auth after the redirection. Since we are using the redirected base for further requests, we also update the credential struct, in order not to mislead the user (or credential helpers) about which credential is needed. We can therefore check the GIT_ASKPASS prompts to make sure we are prompting for the new location. Because we have neither multiple servers nor https support in our test setup, we can only redirect between paths, meaning we need to turn on credential.useHttpPath to see the difference. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-10-14remote-curl: store url as a strbufLibravatar Jeff King1-19/+19
We use a strbuf to generate the string containing the remote URL, but then detach it to a bare pointer. This makes it harder to later manipulate the URL, as we have forgotten the length (and the allocation semantics are not as clear). Let's instead keep the strbuf around. As a bonus, this eliminates a confusing double-use of the "buf" strbuf in main(). Prior to this, it was used both for constructing the url, and for reading commands from stdin. The downside is that we have to update each call site to refer to "url.buf" rather than just "url" when they want the C string. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-10-14remote-curl: make refs_url a strbufLibravatar Jeff King1-8/+7
In the discover_refs function, we use a strbuf named "buffer" for multiple purposes. First we build the info/refs URL in it, and then detach that to a bare pointer. Then, we use the same strbuf to store the result of fetching the refs. Let's instead keep a separate refs_url strbuf. This is less confusing, as the "buffer" strbuf is now used for only one thing. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-10-14http: hoist credential request out of handle_curl_resultLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+6
When we are handling a curl response code in http_request or in the remote-curl RPC code, we use the handle_curl_result helper to translate curl's response into an easy-to-use code. When we see an HTTP 401, we do one of two things: 1. If we already had a filled-in credential, we mark it as rejected, and then return HTTP_NOAUTH to indicate to the caller that we failed. 2. If we didn't, then we ask for a new credential and tell the caller HTTP_REAUTH to indicate that they may want to try again. Rejecting in the first case makes sense; it is the natural result of the request we just made. However, prompting for more credentials in the second step does not always make sense. We do not know for sure that the caller is going to make a second request, and nor are we sure that it will be to the same URL. Logically, the prompt belongs not to the request we just finished, but to the request we are (maybe) about to make. In practice, it is very hard to trigger any bad behavior. Currently, if we make a second request, it will always be to the same URL (even in the face of redirects, because curl handles the redirects internally). And we almost always retry on HTTP_REAUTH these days. The one exception is if we are streaming a large RPC request to the server (e.g., a pushed packfile), in which case we cannot restart. It's extremely unlikely to see a 401 response at this stage, though, as we would typically have seen it when we sent a probe request, before streaming the data. This patch drops the automatic prompt out of case 2, and instead requires the caller to do it. This is a few extra lines of code, and the bug it fixes is unlikely to come up in practice. But it is conceptually cleaner, and paves the way for better handling of credentials across redirects. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-30http: refactor options to http_get_*Libravatar Jeff King1-2/+7
Over time, the http_get_strbuf function has grown several optional parameters. We now have a bitfield with multiple boolean options, as well as an optional strbuf for returning the content-type of the response. And a future patch in this series is going to add another strbuf option. Treating these as separate arguments has a few downsides: 1. Most call sites need to add extra NULLs and 0s for the options they aren't interested in. 2. The http_get_* functions are actually wrappers around 2 layers of low-level implementation functions. We have to pass these options through individually. 3. The http_get_strbuf wrapper learned these options, but nobody bothered to do so for http_get_file, even though it is backed by the same function that does understand the options. Let's consolidate the options into a single struct. For the common case of the default options, we'll allow callers to simply pass a NULL for the options struct. The resulting code is often a few lines longer, but it ends up being easier to read (and to change as we add new options, since we do not need to update each call site). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-07-09remote-http: use argv-arrayLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-16/+16
Instead of using a hand-managed argument array, use argv-array API to manage dynamically formulated command line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-06remote-curl: die directly with http error messagesLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+1
When we encounter an unknown http error (e.g., a 403), we hand the error code to http_error, which then prints it with error(). After that we die with the redundant message "HTTP request failed". Instead, let's just drop http_error entirely, which does nothing but pass arguments to error(), and instead die directly with a useful message. So before: $ git clone https://example.com/repo.git Cloning into 'repo'... error: unable to access 'https://example.com/repo.git': The requested URL returned error: 403 Forbidden fatal: HTTP request failed and after: $ git clone https://example.com/repo.git Cloning into 'repo'... fatal: unable to access 'https://example.com/repo.git': The requested URL returned error: 403 Forbidden Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-06http: simplify http_error helper functionLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
This helper function should really be a one-liner that prints an error message, but it has ended up unnecessarily complicated: 1. We call error() directly when we fail to start the curl request, so we must later avoid printing a duplicate error in http_error(). It would be much simpler in this case to just stuff the error message into our usual curl_errorstr buffer rather than printing it ourselves. This means that http_error does not even have to care about curl's exit value (the interesting part is in the errorstr buffer already). 2. We return the "ret" value passed in to us, but none of the callers actually cares about our return value. We can just drop this entirely. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-06remote-curl: consistently report repo url for http errorsLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
When we report http errors in fetching the initial ref advertisement, we show the full URL we attempted to use, including "info/refs?service=git-upload-pack". While this may be useful for debugging a broken server, it is unnecessarily verbose and confusing for most cases, in which the client user is not even the same person as the owner of the repository. Let's just show the repository URL; debugging can happen with GIT_CURL_VERBOSE, which shows way more useful information, anyway. At the same time, let's also make sure to mention the repository URL when we report failed authentication (previously we said only "Authentication failed"). Knowing the URL can help the user realize why authentication failed (e.g., they meant to push to remote A, not remote B). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-06remote-curl: always show friendlier 404 messageLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+2
When we get an http 404 trying to get the initial list of refs from the server, we try to be helpful and remind the user that update-server-info may need to be run. This looks like: $ git clone https://github.com/non/existent Cloning into 'existent'... fatal: https://github.com/non/existent/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server? Suggesting update-server-info may be a good suggestion for users who are in control of the server repo and who are planning to set up dumb http. But for users of smart http, and especially users who are not in control of the server repo, the advice is useless and confusing. Since most people are expected to use smart http these days, it does not make sense to keep the update-server-info hint. We not only drop the mention of update-server-info, but also show only the main repo URL, not the full "info/refs" and service parameter. These elements may be useful for debugging a broken server configuration, but in the majority of cases, users are not fetching from their own repositories, but rather from other people's repositories; they have neither the power nor interest to fix a broken configuration, and the extra components just make the message more confusing. Users who do want to debug can and should use GIT_CURL_VERBOSE to get more complete information on the actual URLs visited. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-06remote-curl: let servers override http 404 adviceLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+2
When we get an http 404 trying to get the initial list of refs from the server, we try to be helpful and remind the user that update-server-info may need to be run. This looks like: $ git clone https://github.com/non/existent Cloning into 'existent'... fatal: https://github.com/non/existent/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server? Suggesting update-server-info may be a good suggestion for users who are in control of the server repo and who are planning to set up dumb http. But for users of smart http, and especially users who are not in control of the server repo, the advice is useless and confusing. The previous patch taught remote-curl to show custom advice from the server when it is available. When we have shown messages from the server, we can also drop our custom advice; what the server has to say is likely to be more accurate and helpful. We not only drop the mention of update-server-info, but also show only the main repo URL, not the full "info/refs" and service parameter. These elements may be useful for debugging a broken server configuration, but again, anything the server has provided is likely to be more useful (and one can still use GIT_CURL_VERBOSE to get much more complete debugging information). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-06remote-curl: show server content on http errorsLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+32
If an http request to a remote git server fails, we show only the http response code, or sometimes a custom message for particular codes. This gives the server no opportunity to offer a more detailed explanation of the reason for the failure, or to give extra advice. This patch teaches remote-curl to record and display the body content of a failed http response. We only display such responses when the content-type is advertised as text/plain, as it is the most likely to look presentable on the user's terminal (and it is hoped to be a good indication that the message is intended for git clients, and not for a web browser). Each line of the new output is prepended with "remote:". Example output may look like this (assuming the server is configured to display such a helpful message): $ GIT_SMART_HTTP=0 git clone https://example.com/some/repo.git Cloning into 'repo'... remote: Sorry, fetching via dumb http is forbidden. remote: Please upgrade your git client to v1.6.6 or greater remote: and make sure that smart-http is enabled. error: The requested URL returned error: 403 while accessing http://localhost:5001/some/repo.git/info/refs fatal: HTTP request failed For the sake of simplicity, we only record and display these errors during the initial fetch of the ref list, as that is the initial contact with the server and where the most common, interesting errors happen (and there is already precedent, as that is the only place we currently massage http error codes into more helpful messages). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-24remote-curl: always parse incoming refsLibravatar Jeff King1-9/+13
When remote-curl receives a list of refs from a server, it keeps the whole buffer intact. When we get a "list" command, we feed the result to get_remote_heads, and when we get a "fetch" or "push" command, we feed it to fetch-pack or send-pack, respectively. If the HTTP response from the server is truncated for any reason, we will get an incomplete ref advertisement. If we then feed this incomplete list to fetch-pack, one of a few things may happen: 1. If the truncation is in a packet header, fetch-pack will notice the bogus line and complain. 2. If the truncation is inside a packet, fetch-pack will keep waiting for us to send the rest of the packet, which we never will. 3. If the truncation is at a packet boundary, fetch-pack will keep waiting for us to send the next packet, which we never will. As a result, fetch-pack hangs, waiting for input. However, remote-curl believes it has sent all of the advertisement, and therefore waits for fetch-pack to speak. The two processes end up in a deadlock. We do notice the broken ref list if we feed it to get_remote_heads. So if git asks the helper to do a "list" followed by a "fetch", we are safe; we'll abort during the list operation, which parses the refs. This patch teaches remote-curl to always parse and save the incoming ref list when we read the ref advertisement from a server. That means that we will always verify and abort before even running fetch-pack (or send-pack) when reading a corrupted list, even if we do not run the "list" command explicitly. Since we save the result, in the common case of running "list" then "fetch", we do not do any extra parsing at all. In the case of just a "fetch", we do an extra round of parsing, but only once. Note also that the "fetch" case will now also initialize server_capabilities from the remote (in remote-curl; we already would do so inside fetch-pack). Doing "list+fetch" already does this. It doesn't actually matter now, but the new behavior is arguably more correct, should remote-curl ever start caring about the server's capability list. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-24remote-curl: move ref-parsing code up in fileLibravatar Jeff King1-59/+59
The ref-parsing functions are static. Let's move them up in the file to be available to more functions, which will help us with later refactoring. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-24remote-curl: pass buffer straight to get_remote_headsLibravatar Jeff King1-24/+2
Until recently, get_remote_heads only knew how to read refs from a file descriptor. To hack around this, we spawned a thread (or forked a process) to write the buffer back to us. Now that we can just pass it our buffer directly, we don't have to use this hack anymore. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-24teach get_remote_heads to read from a memory bufferLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Now that we can read packet data from memory as easily as a descriptor, get_remote_heads can take either one as a source. This will allow further refactoring in remote-curl. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-24pkt-line: share buffer/descriptor reading implementationLibravatar Jeff King1-12/+10
The packet_read function reads from a descriptor. The packet_get_line function is similar, but reads from an in-memory buffer, and uses a completely separate implementation. This patch teaches the generic packet_read function to accept either source, and we can do away with packet_get_line's implementation. There are two other differences to account for between the old and new functions. The first is that we used to read into a strbuf, but now read into a fixed size buffer. The only two callers are fine with that, and in fact it simplifies their code, since they can use the same static-buffer interface as the rest of the packet_read_line callers (and we provide a similar convenience wrapper for reading from a buffer rather than a descriptor). This is technically an externally-visible behavior change in that we used to accept arbitrary sized packets up to 65532 bytes, and now cap out at LARGE_PACKET_MAX, 65520. In practice this doesn't matter, as we use it only for parsing smart-http headers (of which there is exactly one defined, and it is small and fixed-size). And any extension headers would be breaking the protocol to go over LARGE_PACKET_MAX anyway. The other difference is that packet_get_line would return on error rather than dying. However, both callers of packet_get_line are actually improved by dying. The first caller does its own error checking, but we can drop that; as a result, we'll actually get more specific reporting about protocol breakage when packet_read dies internally. The only downside is that packet_read will not print the smart-http URL that failed, but that's not a big deal; anybody not debugging can already see the remote's URL already, and anybody debugging would want to run with GIT_CURL_VERBOSE anyway to see way more information. The second caller, which is just trying to skip past any extra smart-http headers (of which there are none defined, but which we allow to keep room for future expansion), did not error check at all. As a result, it would treat an error just like a flush packet. The resulting mess would generally cause an error later in get_remote_heads, but now we get error reporting much closer to the source of the problem. Brown-paper-bag-fixes-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-20pkt-line: teach packet_read_line to chomp newlinesLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+3
The packets sent during ref negotiation are all terminated by newline; even though the code to chomp these newlines is short, we end up doing it in a lot of places. This patch teaches packet_read_line to auto-chomp the trailing newline; this lets us get rid of a lot of inline chomping code. As a result, some call-sites which are not reading line-oriented data (e.g., when reading chunks of packfiles alongside sideband) transition away from packet_read_line to the generic packet_read interface. This patch converts all of the existing callsites. Since the function signature of packet_read_line does not change (but its behavior does), there is a possibility of new callsites being introduced in later commits, silently introducing an incompatibility. However, since a later patch in this series will change the signature, such a commit would have to be merged directly into this commit, not to the tip of the series; we can therefore ignore the issue. This is an internal cleanup and should produce no change of behavior in the normal case. However, there is one corner case to note. Callers of packet_read_line have never been able to tell the difference between a flush packet ("0000") and an empty packet ("0004"), as both cause packet_read_line to return a length of 0. Readers treat them identically, even though Documentation/technical/protocol-common.txt says we must not; it also says that implementations should not send an empty pkt-line. By stripping out the newline before the result gets to the caller, we will now treat the newline-only packet ("0005\n") the same as an empty packet, which in turn gets treated like a flush packet. In practice this doesn't matter, as neither empty nor newline-only packets are part of git's protocols (at least not for the line-oriented bits, and readers who are not expecting line-oriented packets will be calling packet_read directly, anyway). But even if we do decide to care about the distinction later, it is orthogonal to this patch. The right place to tighten would be to stop treating empty packets as flush packets, and this change does not make doing so any harder. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-20pkt-line: drop safe_write functionLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
This is just write_or_die by another name. The one distinction is that write_or_die will treat EPIPE specially by suppressing error messages. That's fine, as we die by SIGPIPE anyway (and in the off chance that it is disabled, write_or_die will simulate it). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-04Verify Content-Type from smart HTTP serversLibravatar Shawn Pearce1-5/+12
Before parsing a suspected smart-HTTP response verify the returned Content-Type matches the standard. This protects a client from attempting to process a payload that smells like a smart-HTTP server response. JGit has been doing this check on all responses since the dawn of time. I mistakenly failed to include it in git-core when smart HTTP was introduced. At the time I didn't know how to get the Content-Type from libcurl. I punted, meant to circle back and fix this, and just plain forgot about it. Signed-off-by: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-11-21Merge branch 'jk/maint-http-half-auth-fetch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Finishing touches to squelch a compiler warning. * jk/maint-http-half-auth-fetch: remote-curl.c: Fix a compiler warning
2012-11-21remote-curl.c: Fix a compiler warningLibravatar Ramsay Jones1-1/+1
In particular, gcc issues an "'gzip_size' might be used uninitialized" warning (-Wuninitialized). However, this warning is a false positive, since the 'gzip_size' variable would not, in fact, be used uninitialized. In order to suppress the warning, we simply initialise the variable to zero in it's declaration. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-11-20Merge branch 'jk/maint-http-half-auth-fetch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+17
Fixes fetch from servers that ask for auth only during the actual packing phase. This is not really a recommended configuration, but it cleans up the code at the same time. * jk/maint-http-half-auth-fetch: remote-curl: retry failed requests for auth even with gzip remote-curl: hoist gzip buffer size to top of post_rpc
2012-10-31remote-curl: retry failed requests for auth even with gzipLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+10
Commit b81401c taught the post_rpc function to retry the http request after prompting for credentials. However, it did not handle two cases: 1. If we have a large request, we do not retry. That's OK, since we would have sent a probe (with retry) already. 2. If we are gzipping the request, we do not retry. That was considered OK, because the intended use was for push (e.g., listing refs is OK, but actually pushing objects is not), and we never gzip on push. This patch teaches post_rpc to retry even a gzipped request. This has two advantages: 1. It is possible to configure a "half-auth" state for fetching, where the set of refs and their sha1s are advertised, but one cannot actually fetch objects. This is not a recommended configuration, as it leaks some information about what is in the repository (e.g., an attacker can try brute-forcing possible content in your repository and checking whether it matches your branch sha1). However, it can be slightly more convenient, since a no-op fetch will not require a password at all. 2. It future-proofs us should we decide to ever gzip more requests. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2012-10-31remote-curl: hoist gzip buffer size to top of post_rpcLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+7
When we gzip the post data for a smart-http rpc request, we compute the gzip body and its size inside the "use_gzip" conditional. We keep track of the body after the conditional ends, but not the size. Let's remember both, which will enable us to retry failed gzip requests in a future patch. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2012-10-29Merge branch 'jk/maint-http-init-not-in-result-handler'Libravatar Jeff King1-8/+9
Further clean-up to the http codepath that picks up results after cURL library is done with one request slot. * jk/maint-http-init-not-in-result-handler: http: do not set up curl auth after a 401 remote-curl: do not call run_slot repeatedly
2012-10-16Merge branch 'jk/maint-http-half-auth-push'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Fixes a regression in maint-1.7.11 (v1.7.11.7), maint (v1.7.12.1) and master (v1.8.0-rc0). * jk/maint-http-half-auth-push: http: fix segfault in handle_curl_result
2012-10-12http: do not set up curl auth after a 401Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we get an http 401, we prompt for credentials and put them in our global credential struct. We also feed them to the curl handle that produced the 401, with the intent that they will be used on a retry. When the code was originally introduced in commit 42653c0, this was a necessary step. However, since dfa1725, we always feed our global credential into every curl handle when we initialize the slot with get_active_slot. So every further request already feeds the credential to curl. Moreover, accessing the slot here is somewhat dubious. After the slot has produced a response, we don't actually control it any more. If we are using curl_multi, it may even have been re-initialized to handle a different request. It just so happens that we will reuse the curl handle within the slot in such a case, and that because we only keep one global credential, it will be the one we want. So the current code is not buggy, but it is misleading. By cleaning it up, we can remove the slot argument entirely from handle_curl_result, making it much more obvious that slots should not be accessed after they are marked as finished. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-12remote-curl: do not call run_slot repeatedlyLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+8
Commit b81401c (http: prompt for credentials on failed POST) taught post_rpc to call run_slot in a loop in order to retry a request after asking the user for credentials. However, after a call to run_slot we will have called finish_active_slot. This means we have released the slot, and we should no longer look at it. As it happens, this does not cause any bugs in the current code, since we know that we are not using curl_multi in this code path, and therefore nobody will have taken over our slot in the meantime. However, it is good form to actually call get_active_slot again. It also future proofs us against changes in the http code. We can do this by jumping back to a retry label at the top of our function. We just need to reorder a few setup lines that should not be repeated; everything else within the loop is either idempotent, needs to be repeated, or in a path we do not follow (e.g., we do not even try when large_request is set, because we don't know how much data we might have streamed from our helper program). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-12http: fix segfault in handle_curl_resultLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we create an http active_request_slot, we can set its "results" pointer back to local storage. The http code will fill in the details of how the request went, and we can access those details even after the slot has been cleaned up. Commit 8809703 (http: factor out http error code handling) switched us from accessing our local results struct directly to accessing it via the "results" pointer of the slot. That means we're accessing the slot after it has been marked as finished, defeating the whole purpose of keeping the results storage separate. Most of the time this doesn't matter, as finishing the slot does not actually clean up the pointer. However, when using curl's multi interface with the dumb-http revision walker, we might actually start a new request before handing control back to the original caller. In that case, we may reuse the slot, zeroing its results pointer, and leading the original caller to segfault while looking for its results inside the slot. Instead, we need to pass a pointer to our local results storage to the handle_curl_result function, rather than relying on the pointer in the slot struct. This matches what the original code did before the refactoring (which did not use a separate function, and therefore just accessed the results struct directly). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-29Merge branch 'jk/smart-http-switch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+5
Allows users to turn off smart-http when talking to dumb-only servers. * jk/smart-http-switch: remote-curl: let users turn off smart http remote-curl: rename is_http variable
2012-09-29Merge branch 'sp/maint-http-enable-gzip'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Allows a more common 'gzip' Accept-Encoding to be used. * sp/maint-http-enable-gzip: Enable info/refs gzip decompression in HTTP client
2012-09-21remote-curl: let users turn off smart httpLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+2
Usually there is no need for users to specify whether an http remote is smart or dumb; the protocol is designed so that a single initial request is made, and the client can determine the server's capability from the response. However, some misconfigured dumb-only servers may not like the initial request by a smart client, as it contains a query string. Until recently, commit 703e6e7 worked around this by making a second request. However, that commit was recently reverted due to its side effect of masking the initial request's error code. Since git has had that workaround for several years, we don't know exactly how many such misconfigured servers are out there. The reversion of 703e6e7 assumes they are rare enough not to worry about. Still, that reversion leaves somebody who does run into such a server with no escape hatch at all. Let's give them an environment variable they can tweak to perform the "dumb" request. This is intentionally not a documented interface. It's overly simple and is really there for debugging in case somebody does complain about git not working with their server. A real user-facing interface would entail a per-remote or per-URL config variable. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-20remote-curl: rename is_http variableLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+3
We don't actually care whether the connection is http or not; what we care about is whether it might be smart http. Rename the variable to be more accurate, which will make it easier to later make smart-http optional. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-20Enable info/refs gzip decompression in HTTP clientLibravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-2/+2
Some HTTP servers try to use gzip compression on the /info/refs request to save transfer bandwidth. Repositories with many tags may find the /info/refs request can be gzipped to be 50% of the original size due to the few but often repeated bytes used (hex SHA-1 and commonly digits in tag names). For most HTTP requests enable "Accept-Encoding: gzip" ensuring the /info/refs payload can use this encoding format. Only request gzip encoding from servers. Although deflate is supported by libcurl, most servers have standardized on gzip encoding for compression as that is what most browsers support. Asking for deflate increases request sizes by a few bytes, but is unlikely to ever be used by a server. Disable the Accept-Encoding header on probe RPCs as response bodies are supposed to be exactly 4 bytes long, "0000". The HTTP headers requesting and indicating compression use more space than the data transferred in the body. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-20Revert "retry request without query when info/refs?query fails"Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-16/+2
This reverts commit 703e6e76a14825e5b0c960d525f34e607154b4f7. Retrying without the query parameter was added as a workaround for a single broken HTTP server at git.debian.org[1]. The server was misconfigured to route every request with a query parameter into gitweb.cgi. Admins fixed the server's configuration within 16 hours of the bug report to the Git mailing list, but we still patched Git with this fallback and have been paying for it since. Most Git hosting services configure the smart HTTP protocol and the retry logic confuses users when there is a transient HTTP error as Git dropped the real error from the smart HTTP request. Removing the retry makes root causes easier to identify. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/137609 Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27http: prompt for credentials on failed POSTLibravatar Jeff King1-8/+15
All of the smart-http GET requests go through the http_get_* functions, which will prompt for credentials and retry if we see an HTTP 401. POST requests, however, do not go through any central point. Moreover, it is difficult to retry in the general case; we cannot assume the request body fits in memory or is even seekable, and we don't know how much of it was consumed during the attempt. Most of the time, this is not a big deal; for both fetching and pushing, we make a GET request before doing any POSTs, so typically we figure out the credentials during the first request, then reuse them during the POST. However, some servers may allow a client to get the list of refs from receive-pack without authentication, and then require authentication when the client actually tries to POST the pack. This is not ideal, as the client may do a non-trivial amount of work to generate the pack (e.g., delta-compressing objects). However, for a long time it has been the recommended example configuration in git-http-backend(1) for setting up a repository with anonymous fetch and authenticated push. This setup has always been broken without putting a username into the URL. Prior to commit 986bbc0, it did work with a username in the URL, because git would prompt for credentials before making any requests at all. However, post-986bbc0, it is totally broken. Since it has been advertised in the manpage for some time, we should make sure it works. Unfortunately, it is not as easy as simply calling post_rpc again when it fails, due to the input issue mentioned above. However, we can still make this specific case work by retrying in two specific instances: 1. If the request is large (bigger than LARGE_PACKET_MAX), we will first send a probe request with a single flush packet. Since this request is static, we can freely retry it. 2. If the request is small and we are not using gzip, then we have the whole thing in-core, and we can freely retry. That means we will not retry in some instances, including: 1. If we are using gzip. However, we only do so when calling git-upload-pack, so it does not apply to pushes. 2. If we have a large request, the probe succeeds, but then the real POST wants authentication. This is an extremely unlikely configuration and not worth worrying about. While it might be nice to cover those instances, doing so would be significantly more complex for very little real-world gain. In the long run, we will be much better off when curl learns to internally handle authentication as a callback, and we can cleanly handle all cases that way. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-10Merge branch 'jk/maint-push-progress' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
"git push" over smart-http lost progress output a few releases ago. By Jeff King * jk/maint-push-progress: t5541: test more combinations of --progress teach send-pack about --[no-]progress send-pack: show progress when isatty(2)
2012-05-01Merge branch 'it/fetch-pack-many-refs' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+13
When "git fetch" encounters repositories with too many references, the command line of "fetch-pack" that is run by a helper e.g. remote-curl, may fail to hold all of them. Now such an internal invocation can feed the references through the standard input of "fetch-pack". By Ivan Todoroski * it/fetch-pack-many-refs: remote-curl: main test case for the OS command line overflow fetch-pack: test cases for the new --stdin option remote-curl: send the refs to fetch-pack on stdin fetch-pack: new --stdin option to read refs from stdin Conflicts: t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh
2012-05-01teach send-pack about --[no-]progressLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+1
The send_pack function gets a "progress" flag saying "yes, definitely show progress" or "no, definitely do not show progress". This gets set properly by transport_push when send_pack is called directly. However, when the send-pack command is executed separately (as it is for the remote-curl helper), there is no way to tell it "definitely do this". As a result, we do not properly respect "git push --no-progress" for smart-http remotes; you will still get progress if stderr is a tty. This patch teaches send-pack --progress and --no-progress, and teaches remote-curl to pass the appropriate option to override send-pack's isatty check. This fixes the --no-progress case above, and as a bonus, also makes "git push --progress" work when stderr is not a tty. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-10remote-curl: send the refs to fetch-pack on stdinLibravatar Ivan Todoroski1-5/+13
Now that we can throw an arbitrary number of refs at fetch-pack using its --stdin option, we use it in the remote-curl helper to bypass the OS command line length limit. Signed-off-by: Ivan Todoroski <grnch@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05Merge branch 'sp/smart-http-failure-to-push' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+5
* sp/smart-http-failure-to-push: remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches fail
2012-01-29Merge branch 'sp/smart-http-failure-to-push'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+5
* sp/smart-http-failure-to-push: remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches fail
2012-01-20remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches failLibravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-4/+5
The protocol between transport-helper.c and remote-curl requires remote-curl to always print a blank line after the push command has run. If the blank line is ommitted, transport-helper kills its container process (the git push the user started) with exit(128) and no message indicating a problem, assuming the helper already printed reasonable error text to the console. However if the remote rejects all branches with "ng" commands in the report-status reply, send-pack terminates with non-zero status, and in turn remote-curl exited with non-zero status before outputting the blank line after the helper status printed by send-pack. No error messages reach the user. This caused users to see the following from git push over HTTP when the remote side's update hook rejected the branch: $ git push http://... master Counting objects: 4, done. Delta compression using up to 6 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 301 bytes, done. Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) $ Always print a blank line after the send-pack process terminates, ensuring the helper status report (if it was output) will be correctly parsed by the calling transport-helper.c. This ensures the helper doesn't abort before the status report can be shown to the user. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-08fix push --quiet: add 'quiet' capability to receive-packLibravatar Clemens Buchacher1-1/+3
Currently, git push --quiet produces some non-error output, e.g.: $ git push --quiet Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), done. This fixes a bug reported for the fedora git package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725593 Reported-by: Jesse Keating <jkeating@redhat.com> Cc: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> Commit 90a6c7d4 (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack) introduced the --quiet option to receive-pack and made send-pack pass that option. Older versions of receive-pack do not recognize the option, however, and terminate immediately. The commit was therefore reverted. This change instead adds a 'quiet' capability to receive-pack, which is a backwards compatible. In addition, this fixes push --quiet via http: A verbosity of 0 means quiet for remote helpers. Reported-by: Tobias Ulmer <tobiasu@tmux.org> Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-22Merge branch 'jk/http-push-to-empty'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+4
* jk/http-push-to-empty: remote-curl: don't pass back fake refs Conflicts: remote-curl.c
2011-12-19Merge branch 'jk/maint-push-over-dav'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* jk/maint-push-over-dav: http-push: enable "proactive auth" t5540: test DAV push with authentication Conflicts: http.c
2011-12-19remote-curl: don't pass back fake refsLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+4
When receive-pack advertises its list of refs, it generally hides the capabilities information after a NUL at the end of the first ref. However, when we have an empty repository, there are no refs, and therefore receive-pack writes a fake ref "capabilities^{}" with the capabilities afterwards. On the client side, git reads the result with get_remote_heads(). We pick the capabilities from the end of the line, and then call check_ref() to make sure the ref name is valid. We see that it isn't, and don't bother adding it to our list of refs. However, the call to check_ref() is enabled by passing the REF_NORMAL flag to get_remote_heads. For the regular git transport, we pass REF_NORMAL in get_refs_via_connect() if we are doing a push (since only receive-pack uses this fake ref). But in remote-curl, we never use this flag, and we accept the fake ref as a real one, passing it back from the helper to the parent git-push. Most of the time this bug goes unnoticed, as the fake ref won't match our refspecs. However, if "--mirror" is used, then we see it as remote cruft to be pruned, and try to pass along a deletion refspec for it. Of course this refspec has bogus syntax (because of the ^{}), and the helper complains, aborting the push. Let's have remote-curl mirror what the builtin get_refs_via_connect() does (at least for the case of using git protocol; we can leave the dumb info/refs reader as it is). This also fixes pushing with --mirror to a smart-http remote that uses alternates. The fake ".have" refs the server gives to avoid unnecessary network transfer has a similar bad interactions with the machinery. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-13http-push: enable "proactive auth"Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Before commit 986bbc08, git was proactive about asking for http passwords. It assumed that if you had a username in your URL, you would also want a password, and asked for it before making any http requests. However, this could interfere with the use of .netrc (see 986bbc08 for details). And it was also unnecessary, since the http fetching code had learned to recognize an HTTP 401 and prompt the user then. Furthermore, the proactive prompt could interfere with the usage of .netrc (see 986bbc08 for details). Unfortunately, the http push-over-DAV code never learned to recognize HTTP 401, and so was broken by this change. This patch does a quick fix of re-enabling the "proactive auth" strategy only for http-push, leaving the dumb http fetch and smart-http as-is. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-13drop "match" parameter from get_remote_headsLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
The get_remote_heads function reads the list of remote refs during git protocol session. It dates all the way back to def88e9 (Commit first cut at "git-fetch-pack", 2005-07-04). At that time, the idea was to come up with a list of refs we were interested in, and then filter the list as we got it from the remote side. Later, 1baaae5 (Make maximal use of the remote refs, 2005-10-28) stopped filtering at the get_remote_heads layer, letting us use the non-matching refs to find common history. As a result, all callers now simply pass an empty match list (and any future callers will want to do the same). So let's drop these now-useless parameters. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>