summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/refs.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-05-01search_ref_dir(): return an index rather than a pointerLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-12/+18
Change search_ref_dir() to return the index of the sought entry (or -1 on error) rather than a pointer to the entry. This will make it more natural to use the function for removing an entry from the list. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01repack_without_ref(): silence errors for dangling packed refsLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-2/+35
Stop emitting an error message when deleting a packed reference if we find another dangling packed reference that is overridden by a loose reference. See the previous commit for a longer explanation of the issue. We have to be careful to make sure that the invalid packed reference really *is* overridden by a loose reference; otherwise what we have found is repository corruption, which we *should* report. Please note that this approach is vulnerable to a race condition similar to the race conditions already known to affect packed references [1]: * Process 1 tries to peel packed reference X as part of deleting another packed reference. It discovers that X does not refer to a valid object (because the object that it referred to has been garbage collected). * Process 2 tries to delete reference X. It starts by deleting the loose reference X. * Process 1 checks whether there is a loose reference X. There is not (it has just been deleted by process 2), so process 1 reports a spurious error "X does not point to a valid object!" The worst case seems relatively harmless, and the fix is identical to the fix that will be needed for the other race conditions (namely holding a lock on the packed-refs file during *all* reference deletions), so we leave the cleaning up of all of them as a future project. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/211956 Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: change the internal reference-iteration APILibravatar Michael Haggerty1-61/+83
Establish an internal API for iterating over references, which gives the callback functions direct access to the ref_entry structure describing the reference. (Do not change the iteration API that is exposed outside of the module.) Define a new internal callback signature int each_ref_entry_fn(struct ref_entry *entry, void *cb_data) Change do_for_each_ref_in_dir() and do_for_each_ref_in_dirs() to accept each_ref_entry_fn callbacks, and rename them to do_for_each_entry_in_dir() and do_for_each_entry_in_dirs(), respectively. Adapt their callers accordingly. Add a new function do_for_each_entry() analogous to do_for_each_ref() but using the new callback style. Change do_one_ref() into an each_ref_entry_fn that does some bookkeeping and then calls a wrapped each_ref_fn. Reimplement do_for_each_ref() in terms of do_for_each_entry(), using do_one_ref() as an adapter. Please note that the responsibility for setting current_ref remains in do_one_ref(), which means that current_ref is *not* set when iterating over references via the new internal API. This is not a disadvantage, because current_ref is not needed by callers of the internal API (they receive a pointer to the current ref_entry anyway). But more importantly, this change prevents peel_ref() from returning invalid results in the following scenario: When iterating via the external API, the iteration always includes both packed and loose references, and in particular never presents a packed ref if there is a loose ref with the same name. The internal API, on the other hand, gives the option to iterate over only the packed references. During such an iteration, there is no check whether the packed ref might be hidden by a loose ref of the same name. But until now the packed ref was recorded in current_ref during the iteration. So if peel_ref() were called with the reference name corresponding to current ref, it would return the peeled version of the packed ref even though there might be a loose ref that peels to a different value. This scenario doesn't currently occur in the code, but fix it to prevent things from breaking in a very confusing way in the future. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: extract a function peel_entry()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-14/+49
Peel the entry, and as a side effect store the peeled value in the entry. Use this function from two places in peel_ref(); a third caller will be added soon. Please note that this change can lead to ref_entries for unpacked refs being peeled. This has no practical benefit but is harmless. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01peel_ref(): fix return value for non-peelable, not-current referenceLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-1/+4
The old version was inconsistent: when a reference was REF_KNOWS_PEELED but with a null peeled value, it returned non-zero for the current reference but zero for other references. Change the behavior for non-current references to match that of current_ref, which is what callers expect. Document the behavior. Current callers only call peel_ref() from within a for_each_ref-style iteration and only for the current ref; therefore, the buggy code path was never reached. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01peel_object(): give more specific information in return valueLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-8/+24
Instead of just returning a success/failure bit, return an enumeration value that explains the reason for any failure. This will come in handy shortly. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: extract function peel_object()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-20/+30
It is a nice, logical unit of work, and putting it in a function removes the need to use a goto in peel_ref(). Soon it will also have other uses. The algorithm is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: extract a function ref_resolves_to_object()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-8/+20
It is a nice unit of work and soon will be needed from multiple locations. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01repack_without_ref(): use function get_packed_ref()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-3/+5
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01peel_ref(): use function get_packed_ref()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-3/+2
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01get_packed_ref(): return a ref_entryLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-11/+9
Instead of copying the reference's SHA1 into a caller-supplied variable, just return the ref_entry itself (or NULL if there is no such entry). This change will allow the function to be used from elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01do_for_each_ref_in_dirs(): remove dead codeLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-7/+0
There is no way to drop out of the while loop. This code has been dead since 432ad41e. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: define constant PEELED_LINE_LENGTHLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-2/+5
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: document how current_ref is usedLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-0/+9
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: document do_for_each_ref() and do_one_ref()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-1/+14
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: document the fields of struct ref_valueLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-0/+12
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-01refs: document flags constants REF_*Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-1/+11
Document the bits that can appear in the "flags" parameter passed to an each_ref_function and/or in the ref_entry::flag field. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-03Merge branch 'jk/fully-peeled-packed-ref' into maint-1.8.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+44
* jk/fully-peeled-packed-ref: pack-refs: add fully-peeled trait pack-refs: write peeled entry for non-tags use parse_object_or_die instead of die("bad object") avoid segfaults on parse_object failure
2013-03-18pack-refs: add fully-peeled traitLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-5/+44
Older versions of pack-refs did not write peel lines for refs outside of refs/tags. This meant that on reading the pack-refs file, we might set the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for such a ref, even though we do not know anything about its peeled value. The previous commit updated the writer to always peel, no matter what the ref is. That means that packed-refs files written by newer versions of git are fine to be read by both old and new versions of git. However, we still have the problem of reading packed-refs files written by older versions of git, or by other implementations which have not yet learned the same trick. The simplest fix would be to always unset the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for refs outside of refs/tags that do not have a peel line (if it has a peel line, we know it is valid, but we cannot assume a missing peel line means anything). But that loses an important optimization, as upload-pack should not need to load the object pointed to by refs/heads/foo to determine that it is not a tag. Instead, we add a "fully-peeled" trait to the packed-refs file. If it is set, we know that we can trust a missing peel line to mean that a ref cannot be peeled. Otherwise, we fall back to assuming nothing. [commit message and tests by Jeff King <peff@peff.net>] Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-10Merge branch 'jk/repack-ref-racefix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+4
* jk/repack-ref-racefix: refs: do not use cached refs in repack_without_ref
2012-12-21refs: do not use cached refs in repack_without_refLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+4
When we delete a ref that is packed, we rewrite the whole packed-refs file and simply omit the ref that no longer exists. However, we base the rewrite on whatever happens to be in our refs cache, not what is necessarily on disk. That opens us up to a race condition if another process is simultaneously packing the refs, as we will overwrite their newly-made pack-refs file with our potentially stale data, losing commits. You can demonstrate the race like this: # setup some repositories git init --bare parent && (cd parent && git config core.logallrefupdates true) && git clone parent child && (cd child && git commit --allow-empty -m base) # in one terminal, repack the refs repeatedly cd parent && while true; do git pack-refs --all done # in another terminal, simultaneously push updates to # master, and create and delete an unrelated ref cd child && while true; do git push origin HEAD:newbranch && git commit --allow-empty -m foo us=`git rev-parse master` && git push origin master && git push origin :newbranch && them=`git --git-dir=../parent rev-parse master` && if test "$them" != "$us"; then echo >&2 "$them" != "$us" exit 1 fi done In many cases the two processes will conflict over locking the packed-refs file, and the deletion of newbranch will simply fail. But eventually you will hit the race, which happens like this: 1. We push a new commit to master. It is already packed (from the looping pack-refs call). We write the new value (let us call it B) to $GIT_DIR/refs/heads/master, but the old value (call it A) remains in the packed-refs file. 2. We push the deletion of newbranch, spawning a receive-pack process. Receive-pack advertises all refs to the client, causing it to iterate over each ref; it caches the packed refs in memory, which points at the stale value A. 3. Meanwhile, a separate pack-refs process is running. It runs to completion, updating the packed-refs file to point master at B, and deleting $GIT_DIR/refs/heads/master which also pointed at B. 4. Back in the receive-pack process, we get the instruction to delete :newbranch. We take a lock on packed-refs (which works, as the other pack-refs process has already finished). We then rewrite the contents using the cached refs, which contain the stale value A. The resulting packed-refs file points master once again at A. The loose ref which would override it to point at B was deleted (rightfully) in step 3. As a result, master now points at A. The only trace that B ever existed in the parent is in the reflog: the final entry will show master moving from A to B, even though the ref still points at A (so you can detect this race after the fact, because the next reflog entry will move from A to C). We can fix this by invalidating the packed-refs cache after we have taken the lock. This means that we will re-read the packed-refs file, and since we have the lock, we will be sure that what we read will be atomically up-to-date when we write (it may be out of date with respect to loose refs, but that is OK, as loose refs take precedence). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-11-25Merge branch 'jh/update-ref-d-through-symref'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"update-ref -d --deref SYM" to delete a ref through a symbolic ref that points to it did not remove it correctly. * jh/update-ref-d-through-symref: Fix failure to delete a packed ref through a symref t1400-update-ref: Add test verifying bug with symrefs in delete_ref()
2012-11-09Merge branch 'rs/lock-correct-ref-during-delete'Libravatar Jeff King1-13/+5
When "update-ref -d --no-deref SYM" tried to delete a symbolic ref SYM, it incorrectly locked the underlying reference pointed by SYM, not the symbolic ref itself. * rs/lock-correct-ref-during-delete: refs: lock symref that is to be deleted, not its target
2012-10-21Fix failure to delete a packed ref through a symrefLibravatar Johan Herland1-1/+1
When deleting a ref through a symref (e.g. using 'git update-ref -d HEAD' to delete refs/heads/master), we would remove the loose ref, but a packed version of the same ref would remain, the end result being that instead of deleting refs/heads/master we would appear to reset it to its state as of the last repack. This patch fixes the issue, by making sure we pass the correct ref name when invoking repack_without_ref() from within delete_ref(). Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-16refs: lock symref that is to be deleted, not its targetLibravatar René Scharfe1-13/+5
When delete_ref is called on a symref then it locks its target and then either deletes the target or the symref, depending on whether the flag REF_NODEREF was set in the parameter delopt. Instead, simply pass the flag to lock_ref_sha1_basic, which will then either lock the target or the symref, and delete the locked ref. This reimplements part of eca35a25 (Fix git branch -m for symrefs.). Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-04peel_ref: check object type before loadingLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+9
The point of peel_ref is to dereference tags; if the base object is not a tag, then we can return early without even loading the object into memory. This patch accomplishes that by checking sha1_object_info for the type. For a packed object, we can get away with just looking in the pack index. For a loose object, we only need to inflate the first couple of header bytes. This is a bit of a gamble; if we do find a tag object, then we will end up loading the content anyway, and the extra lookup will have been wasteful. However, if it is not a tag object, then we save loading the object entirely. Depending on the ratio of non-tags to tags in the input, this can be a minor win or minor loss. However, it does give us one potential major win: if a ref points to a large blob (e.g., via an unannotated tag), then we can avoid looking at it entirely. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-04peel_ref: do not return a null sha1Libravatar Jeff King1-0/+2
The idea of the peel_ref function is to dereference tag objects recursively until we hit a non-tag, and return the sha1. Conceptually, it should return 0 if it is successful (and fill in the sha1), or -1 if there was nothing to peel. However, the current behavior is much more confusing. For a regular loose ref, the behavior is as described above. But there is an optimization to reuse the peeled-ref value for a ref that came from a packed-refs file. If we have such a ref, we return its peeled value, even if that peeled value is null (indicating that we know the ref definitely does _not_ peel). It might seem like such information is useful to the caller, who would then know not to bother loading and trying to peel the object. Except that they should not bother loading and trying to peel the object _anyway_, because that fallback is already handled by peel_ref. In other words, the whole point of calling this function is that it handles those details internally, and you either get a sha1, or you know that it is not peel-able. This patch catches the null sha1 case internally and converts it into a -1 return value (i.e., there is nothing to peel). This simplifies callers, which do not need to bother checking themselves. Two callers are worth noting: - in pack-objects, a comment indicates that there is a difference between non-peelable tags and unannotated tags. But that is not the case (before or after this patch). Whether you get a null sha1 has to do with internal details of how peel_ref operated. - in show-ref, if peel_ref returns a failure, the caller tries to decide whether to try peeling manually based on whether the REF_ISPACKED flag is set. But this doesn't make any sense. If the flag is set, that does not necessarily mean the ref came from a packed-refs file with the "peeled" extension. But it doesn't matter, because even if it didn't, there's no point in trying to peel it ourselves, as peel_ref would already have done so. In other words, the fallback peeling is guaranteed to fail. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-04peel_ref: use faster deref_tag_noverifyLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we are asked to peel a ref to a sha1, we internally call deref_tag, which will recursively parse each tagged object until we reach a non-tag. This has the benefit that we will verify our ability to load and parse the pointed-to object. However, there is a performance downside: we may not need to load that object at all (e.g., if we are listing peeled simply listing peeled refs), or it may be a large object that should follow a streaming code path (e.g., an annotated tag of a large blob). It makes more sense for peel_ref to choose the fast thing rather than performing the extra check, for two reasons: 1. We will already sometimes short-circuit the tag parsing in favor of a peeled entry from a packed-refs file. So we are already favoring speed in some cases, and it is not wise for a caller to rely on peel_ref to detect corruption. 2. We already silently ignore much larger corruptions, like a ref that points to a non-existent object, or a tag object that exists but is corrupted. 2. peel_ref is not the right place to check for such a database corruption. It is returning only the sha1 anyway, not the actual object. Any callers which use that sha1 to load an object will soon discover the corruption anyway, so we are really just pushing back the discovery to later in the program. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-29Merge branch 'rs/refs-string-slice'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-29/+41
Avoid unnecessary temporary allocations while looking for matching refs inside refs API. By René Scharfe (3) and Junio C Hamano (1) * rs/refs-string-slice: refs: do not create ref_entry when searching refs: use strings directly in find_containing_dir() refs: convert parameter of create_dir_entry() to length-limited string refs: convert parameter of search_ref_dir() to length-limited string
2012-05-29Merge branch 'mh/ref-api-lazy-loose'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+7
The code to lazily read loose refs unnecessarily read the refs in a subhierarchy by mistake when we free the data for the subhierarchy. By Michael Haggerty * mh/ref-api-lazy-loose: free_ref_entry(): do not trigger reading of loose refs
2012-05-25Merge branch 'mh/ref-api'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
Fixes a performance regression in the earlier series.
2012-05-24Avoid sorting if references are added to ref_cache in orderLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-0/+6
The old code allowed many references to be efficiently added to a single directory, because it just appended the references to the containing directory unsorted without doing any searching (and therefore without requiring any intermediate sorting). But the old code was inefficient when a large number of subdirectories were added to a directory, because the directory always had to be searched to see if the new subdirectory already existed, and this search required the directory to be sorted first. The same was repeated for every new subdirectory, so the time scaled like O(N^2), where N is the number of subdirectories within a single directory. In practice, references are often added to the ref_cache in lexicographic order, for example when reading the packed-refs file. So build some intelligence into add_entry_to_dir() to optimize for the case of references and/or subdirectories being added in lexicographic order: if the existing entries were already sorted, and the new entry comes after the last existing entry, then adjust ref_dir::sorted to reflect the fact that the ref_dir is still sorted. Thanks to Peff for pointing out the performance regression that inspired this change. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-22refs: do not create ref_entry when searchingLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+23
The search_ref_dir() function is about looking up an existing ref_entry in a sorted array of ref_entry stored in dir->entries, but it still allocates a new ref_entry and frees it before returning. This is only because the call to bsearch(3) was coded in a suboptimal way. Unlike the comparison function given to qsort(3), the first parameter to its comparison function does not need to point at an object that is shaped like an element in the array. Introduce a new comparison function that takes a counted string as the key and an element in an array of ref_entry and give it to bsearch(), so that we do not have to allocate a new ref_entry that we will never return to the caller anyway. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-22refs: use strings directly in find_containing_dir()Libravatar René Scharfe1-9/+4
Convert the parameter subdirname of search_for_subdir() to a length-limted string and then simply pass the interesting slice of the refname from find_containing_dir(), thereby avoiding to duplicate the string. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-22refs: convert parameter of create_dir_entry() to length-limited stringLibravatar René Scharfe1-8/+10
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-22refs: convert parameter of search_ref_dir() to length-limited stringLibravatar René Scharfe1-6/+7
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-20free_ref_entry(): do not trigger reading of loose refsLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-2/+7
Do not call get_ref_dir() from within free_ref_entry(), because that triggers the reading of loose refs, only for them to be freed immediately. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-10Merge branch 'mh/ref-api-lazy-loose'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-134/+242
Refs API is updated to lazily read sub-hierarchies of refs/ namespace, so that we do not have to grab everything from the filesystem when we are only interested in listing branches, for example. By Michael Haggerty (17) and Junio C Hamano (1) * mh/ref-api-lazy-loose: refs: fix find_containing_dir() regression refs: read loose references lazily read_loose_refs(): eliminate ref_cache argument struct ref_dir: store a reference to the enclosing ref_cache search_for_subdir(): return (ref_dir *) instead of (ref_entry *) get_ref_dir(): add function for getting a ref_dir from a ref_entry read_loose_refs(): rename function from get_ref_dir() refs: wrap top-level ref_dirs in ref_entries find_containing_dir(): use strbuf in implementation of this function bisect: copy filename string obtained from git_path() do_for_each_reflog(): use a strbuf to hold logfile name do_for_each_reflog(): return early on error get_ref_dir(): take the containing directory as argument refs.c: extract function search_for_subdir() get_ref_dir(): require that the dirname argument ends in '/' get_ref_dir(): rename "base" parameter to "dirname" get_ref_dir(): use a strbuf to hold refname get_ref_dir(): return early if directory cannot be read
2012-05-04refs: fix find_containing_dir() regressionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
The function used to return NULL when asked to find the containing directory for a ref that does not exist, allowing the caller to omit iteration altogether. But a misconversion in an earlier change "refs.c: extract function search_for_subdir()" started returning the top-level directory entry, forcing callers to walk everything. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03refs: read loose references lazilyLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-29/+96
Instead of reading the whole directory of loose references the first time any are needed, only read them on demand, one directory at a time. Use a new ref_entry flag bit REF_INCOMPLETE to indicate that the entry represents a REF_DIR that hasn't been read yet. Whenever any entries from such a directory are needed, read all of the loose references from that directory. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03read_loose_refs(): eliminate ref_cache argumentLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+4
The ref_cache can now be read from the ref_dir. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03struct ref_dir: store a reference to the enclosing ref_cacheLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+11
This means that a directory ref_entry contains all of the information needed by read_loose_refs(). Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03search_for_subdir(): return (ref_dir *) instead of (ref_entry *)Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-11/+10
That is what all the callers want, so give it to them. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03get_ref_dir(): add function for getting a ref_dir from a ref_entryLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-15/+25
Convert all accesses of a ref_dir within a ref_entry to use this function. This function will later be responsible for reading loose references from disk on demand. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03read_loose_refs(): rename function from get_ref_dir()Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-7/+7
The new name better describes the function's purpose, and also makes the old name available for a more suitable purpose. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03refs: wrap top-level ref_dirs in ref_entriesLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-18/+19
Make it turtles all the way down. This affects the loose and packed fields of ref_cache instances. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03find_containing_dir(): use strbuf in implementation of this functionLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-9/+10
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03do_for_each_reflog(): use a strbuf to hold logfile nameLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-29/+31
This simplifies the bookkeeping and allows an (artificial) restriction on refname component length to be removed. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03do_for_each_reflog(): return early on errorLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-35/+35
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-03get_ref_dir(): take the containing directory as argumentLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+8
Previously, the "dir" argument to get_ref_dir() was a pointer to the top-level ref_dir. Change the function to expect a pointer to the ref_dir corresponding to dirname. This allows entries to be added directly to dir, without having to recurse through the reference trie each time (i.e., we can use add_entry_to_dir() instead of add_ref()). Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>