summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/read-cache.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-11-12Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
* maint: Start 1.6.0.5 cycle Fix pack.packSizeLimit and --max-pack-size handling checkout: Fix "initial checkout" detection Remove the period after the git-check-attr summary Conflicts: RelNotes
2008-11-12checkout: Fix "initial checkout" detectionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
Earlier commit 5521883 (checkout: do not lose staged removal, 2008-09-07) tightened the rule to prevent switching branches from losing local changes, so that staged removal of paths can be protected, while attempting to keep a loophole to still allow a special case of switching out of an un-checked-out state. However, the loophole was made a bit too tight, and did not allow switching from one branch (in an un-checked-out state) to check out another branch. The change to builtin-checkout.c in this commit loosens it to allow this, by not insisting the original commit and the new commit to be the same. It also introduces a new function, is_index_unborn (and an associated macro, is_cache_unborn), to check if the repository is truly in an un-checked-out state more reliably, by making sure that $GIT_INDEX_FILE did not exist when populating the in-core index structure. A few places the earlier commit 5521883 added the check for the initial checkout condition are updated to use this function. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-02Merge branch 'jk/maint-ls-files-other' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+28
* jk/maint-ls-files-other: refactor handling of "other" files in ls-files and status
2008-10-22rm: loosen safety valve for empty filesLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
If a file is different between the working tree copy, the index, and the HEAD, then we do not allow it to be deleted without --force. However, this is overly tight in the face of "git add --intent-to-add": $ git add --intent-to-add file $ : oops, I don't actually want to stage that yet $ git rm --cached file error: 'empty' has staged content different from both the file and the HEAD (use -f to force removal) $ git rm -f --cached file Unfortunately, there is currently no way to distinguish between an empty file that has been added and an "intent to add" file. The ideal behavior would be to disallow the former while allowing the latter. This patch loosens the safety valve to allow the deletion only if we are deleting the cached entry and the cached content is empty. This covers the intent-to-add situation, and assumes there is little harm in not protecting users who have legitimately added an empty file. In many cases, the file will still be empty, in which case the safety valve does not trigger anyway (since the content remains untouched in the working tree). Otherwise, we do remove the fact that no content was staged, but given that the content is by definition empty, it is not terribly difficult for a user to recreate it. However, we still document the desired behavior in the form of two tests. One checks the correct removal of an intent-to-add file. The other checks that we still disallow removal of empty files, but is marked as expect_failure to indicate this compromise. If the intent-to-add feature is ever extended to differentiate between normal empty files and intent-to-add files, then the safety valve can be re-tightened. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-21Merge branch 'jk/fix-ls-files-other'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
* jk/fix-ls-files-other: refactor handling of "other" files in ls-files and status
2008-10-21Merge branch 'jc/maint-reset-remove-unmerged-new'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-13/+18
* jc/maint-reset-remove-unmerged-new: reset --hard/read-tree --reset -u: remove unmerged new paths
2008-10-18reset --hard/read-tree --reset -u: remove unmerged new pathsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-13/+18
When aborting a failed merge that has brought in a new path using "git reset --hard" or "git read-tree --reset -u", we used to first forget about the new path (via read_cache_unmerged) and then matched the working tree to what is recorded in the index, thus ending up leaving the new path in the work tree. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-17Merge branch 'jk/maint-ls-files-other' into jk/fix-ls-files-otherLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
* jk/maint-ls-files-other: refactor handling of "other" files in ls-files and status Conflicts: read-cache.c
2008-10-17refactor handling of "other" files in ls-files and statusLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+28
When the "git status" display code was originally converted to C, we copied the code from ls-files to discover whether a pathname returned by read_directory was an "other", or untracked, file. Much later, 5698454e updated the code in ls-files to handle some new cases caused by gitlinks. This left the code in wt-status.c broken: it would display submodule directories as untracked directories. Nobody noticed until now, however, because unless status.showUntrackedFiles was set to "all", submodule directories were not actually reported by read_directory. So the bug was only triggered in the presence of a submodule _and_ this config option. This patch pulls the ls-files code into a new function, cache_name_is_other, and uses it in both places. This should leave the ls-files functionality the same and fix the bug in status. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-12Replace calls to strbuf_init(&foo, 0) with STRBUF_INIT initializerLibravatar Brandon Casey1-2/+1
Many call sites use strbuf_init(&foo, 0) to initialize local strbuf variable "foo" which has not been accessed since its declaration. These can be replaced with a static initialization using the STRBUF_INIT macro which is just as readable, saves a function call, and takes up fewer lines. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-10-12print an error message for invalid pathLibravatar Dmitry Potapov1-2/+4
If verification of path failed, it is always better to print an error message saying this than relying on the caller function to print a meaningful error message (especially when the callee already prints error message for another situation). Because the callers of add_index_entry_with_check() did not print any error message, it resulted that the user would not notice the problem when checkout of an invalid path failed. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-10-09Merge branch 'jc/add-ita'Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-5/+24
* jc/add-ita: git-add --intent-to-add (-N)
2008-10-02fix openssl headers conflicting with custom SHA1 implementationsLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-14/+14
On ARM I have the following compilation errors: CC fast-import.o In file included from cache.h:8, from builtin.h:6, from fast-import.c:142: arm/sha1.h:14: error: conflicting types for 'SHA_CTX' /usr/include/openssl/sha.h:105: error: previous declaration of 'SHA_CTX' was here arm/sha1.h:16: error: conflicting types for 'SHA1_Init' /usr/include/openssl/sha.h:115: error: previous declaration of 'SHA1_Init' was here arm/sha1.h:17: error: conflicting types for 'SHA1_Update' /usr/include/openssl/sha.h:116: error: previous declaration of 'SHA1_Update' was here arm/sha1.h:18: error: conflicting types for 'SHA1_Final' /usr/include/openssl/sha.h:117: error: previous declaration of 'SHA1_Final' was here make: *** [fast-import.o] Error 1 This is because openssl header files are always included in git-compat-util.h since commit 684ec6c63c whenever NO_OPENSSL is not set, which somehow brings in <openssl/sha1.h> clashing with the custom ARM version. Compilation of git is probably broken on PPC too for the same reason. Turns out that the only file requiring openssl/ssl.h and openssl/err.h is imap-send.c. But only moving those problematic includes there doesn't solve the issue as it also includes cache.h which brings in the conflicting local SHA1 header file. As suggested by Jeff King, the best solution is to rename our references to SHA1 functions and structure to something git specific, and define those according to the implementation used. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-18Merge branch 'jc/maint-name-hash-clear' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* jc/maint-name-hash-clear: discard_cache: reset lazy name_hash bit
2008-09-16Merge branch 'jc/maint-name-hash-clear'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* jc/maint-name-hash-clear: discard_cache: reset lazy name_hash bit
2008-08-31git-add --intent-to-add (-N)Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+24
This adds "--intent-to-add" option to "git add". This is to let the system know that you will tell it the final contents to be staged later, iow, just be aware of the presense of the path with the type of the blob for now. It is implemented by staging an empty blob as the content. With this sequence: $ git reset --hard $ edit newfile $ git add -N newfile $ edit newfile oldfile $ git diff the diff will show all changes relative to the current commit. Then you can do: $ git commit -a ;# commit everything or $ git commit oldfile ;# only oldfile, newfile not yet added to pretend you are working with an index-free system like CVS. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-27Merge branch 'jc/add-addremove'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+61
* jc/add-addremove: builtin-add.c: optimize -A option and "git add ." builtin-add.c: restructure the code for maintainability
2008-08-23Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
* maint: unpack_trees(): protect the handcrafted in-core index from read_cache() git-p4: Fix one-liner in p4_write_pipe function. Completion: add missing '=' for 'diff --diff-filter' Fix 'git help help'
2008-08-23unpack_trees(): protect the handcrafted in-core index from read_cache()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
unpack_trees() rebuilds the in-core index from scratch by allocating a new structure and finishing it off by copying the built one to the final index. The resulting in-core index is Ok for most use, but read_cache() does not recognize it as such. The function is meant to be no-op if you already have loaded the index, until you call discard_cache(). This change the way read_cache() detects an already initialized in-core index, by introducing an extra bit, and marks the handcrafted in-core index as initialized, to avoid this problem. A better fix in the longer term would be to change the read_cache() API so that it will always discard and re-read from the on-disk index to avoid confusion. But there are higher level API that have relied on the current semantics, and they and their users all need to get converted, which is outside the scope of 'maint' track. An example of such a higher level API is write_cache_as_tree(), which is used by git-write-tree as well as later Porcelains like git-merge, revert and cherry-pick. In the longer term, we should remove read_cache() from there and add one to cmd_write_tree(); other callers expect that the in-core index they prepared is what gets written as a tree so no other change is necessary for this particular codepath. The original version of this patch marked the index by pointing an otherwise wasted malloc'ed memory with o->result.alloc, but this version uses Linus's idea to use a new "initialized" bit, which is conceptually much cleaner. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-23discard_cache: reset lazy name_hash bitLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
We forgot to reset name_hash_initialized bit when discarding the in-core index. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-17index: future proof for "extended" index entriesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
We do not have any more bits in the on-disk index flags word, but we would need to have more in the future. Use the last remaining bits as a signal to tell us that the index entry we are looking at is an extended one. Since we do not understand the extended format yet, we will just error out when we see it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-30Teach gitlinks to ie_modified() and ce_modified_check_fs()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+22
The ie_modified() function is the workhorse for refresh_cache_entry(), i.e. checking if an index entry that is stat-dirty actually has changes. After running quicker check to compare cached stat information with results from the latest lstat(2) to answer "has modification" early, the code goes on to check if there really is a change by comparing the staged data with what is on the filesystem by asking ce_modified_check_fs(). However, this function always said "no change" for any gitlinks that has a directory at the corresponding path. This made ie_modified() to miss actual changes in the subproject. The patch fixes this first by modifying an existing short-circuit logic before calling the ce_modified_check_fs() function. It knows that for any filesystem entity to which ie_match_stat() says its data has changed, if its cached size is nonzero then the contents cannot match, which is a correct optimization only for blob objects. We teach gitlink objects to this special case, as we already know that any gitlink that ie_match_stat() says is modified is indeed modified at this point in the codepath. With the above change, we could leave ce_modified_check_fs() broken, but it also futureproofs the code by teaching it to use ce_compare_gitlink(), instead of assuming (incorrectly) that any directory is unchanged. Originally noticed by Alex Riesen on Cygwin. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-28Make use of stat.ctime configurableLibravatar Alex Riesen1-1/+1
A new configuration variable 'core.trustctime' is introduced to allow ignoring st_ctime information when checking if paths in the working tree has changed, because there are situations where it produces too much false positives. Like when file system crawlers keep changing it when scanning and using the ctime for marking scanned files. The default is to notice ctime changes. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-27git-mv: Keep moved index entries inactLibravatar Petr Baudis1-0/+16
The rewrite of git-mv from a shell script to a builtin was perhaps a little too straightforward: the git add and git rm queues were emulated directly, which resulted in a rather complicated code and caused an inconsistent behaviour when moving dirty index entries; git mv would update the entry based on working tree state, except in case of overwrites, where the new entry would still have sha1 of the old file. This patch introduces rename_index_entry_at() into the index toolkit, which will rename an entry while removing any entries the new entry might render duplicate. This is then used in git mv instead of all the file queues, resulting in a major simplification of the code and an inevitable change in git mv -n output format. Also the code used to refuse renaming overwriting symlink with a regular file and vice versa; there is no need for that. A few new tests have been added to the testsuite to reflect this change. Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-25builtin-add.c: restructure the code for maintainabilityLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+61
A private function add_files_to_cache() in builtin-add.c was borrowed by checkout and commit re-implementors without getting properly refactored to more library-ish place. This does the refactoring. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-20"needs update" considered harmfulLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+4
"git update-index --refresh", "git reset" and "git add --refresh" have reported paths that have local modifications as "needs update" since the beginning of git. Although this is logically correct in that you need to update the index at that path before you can commit that change, it is now becoming more and more clear, especially with the continuous push for user friendliness since 1.5.0 series, that the message is suboptimal. After all, the change may be something the user might want to get rid of, and "updating" would be absolutely a wrong thing to do if that is the case. I prepared two alternatives to solve this. Both aim to reword the message to more neutral "locally modified". This patch is a more intrusive variant that changes the message for only Porcelain commands ("add" and "reset") while keeping the plumbing "update-index" intact. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-16read-cache.c: typofixLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-30Move read_cache_unmerged() to read-cache.cLibravatar Miklos Vajna1-0/+31
builtin-read-tree has a read_cache_unmerged() which is useful for other builtins, for example builtin-merge uses it as well. Move it to read-cache.c to avoid code duplication. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-22Merge branch 'lt/racy-empty'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
* lt/racy-empty: racy-git: an empty blob has a fixed object name
2008-06-19racy-git: an empty blob has a fixed object nameLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-0/+16
We use size=0 as the magic token to say the entry is known to be racily clean, but a sequence that does: - update the path with a non-empty blob and write the index; - update an unrelated path and write the index -- this smudges the above entry; - truncate the path to size zero. would make both the size field for the path in the index and the size on the filesystem zero. We should not mistake it as a clean index entry. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-31Add shortcut in refresh_cache_ent() for marked entries.Libravatar Marius Storm-Olsen1-0/+9
When a cache entry has been marked as CE_VALID, the user has promised us that any change in the work tree does not matter. Just mark the entry as up-to-date, and continue. Signed-off-by: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-25Merge branch 'jc/add-n-u'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+17
* jc/add-n-u: Make git add -n and git -u -n output consistent "git-add -n -u" should not add but just report Conflicts: builtin-add.c builtin-mv.c cache.h read-cache.c
2008-05-25Merge branch 'js/ignore-submodule'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* js/ignore-submodule: Ignore dirty submodule states during rebase and stash Teach update-index about --ignore-submodules diff options: Introduce --ignore-submodules
2008-05-21"git-add -n -u" should not add but just reportLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+17
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-15Teach update-index about --ignore-submodulesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
Like with the diff machinery, update-index should sometimes just ignore submodules (e.g. to determine a clean state before a rebase). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-12Make the exit code of add_file_to_index actually usefulLibravatar Alex Riesen1-3/+3
Update the programs which used the function (as add_file_to_cache). Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-10Avoid some unnecessary lstat() callsLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-12/+17
The commit sequence used to do if (file_exists(p->path)) add_file_to_cache(p->path, 0); where both "file_exists()" and "add_file_to_cache()" needed to do a lstat() on the path to do their work. This cuts down 'lstat()' calls for the partial commit case by two for each path we know about (because we do this twice per path). Just move the lstat() to the caller instead (that's all that "file_exists()" really does), and pass the stat information down to the add_to_cache() function. This essentially makes 'add_to_index()' the core function that adds a path to the index, getting the index pointer, the pathname and the stat information as arguments. There are then shorthand helper functions that use this core function: - 'add_to_cache()' is just 'add_to_index()' with the default index - 'add_file_to_cache/index()' is the same, but does the lstat() call itself, so you can pass just the pathname if you don't already have the stat information available. So old users of the 'add_file_to_xyzzy()' are essentially left unchanged, and this just exposes the more generic helper function that can take existing stat information into account. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-10Merge branch 'py/diff-submodule'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* py/diff-submodule: is_racy_timestamp(): do not check timestamp for gitlinks diff-lib.c: rename check_work_tree_entity() diff: a submodule not checked out is not modified Add t7506 to test submodule related functions for git-status t4027: test diff for submodule with empty directory
2008-05-10Merge branch 'lt/case-insensitive'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-70/+44
* lt/case-insensitive: Make git-add behave more sensibly in a case-insensitive environment When adding files to the index, add support for case-independent matches Make unpack-tree update removed files before any updated files Make branch merging aware of underlying case-insensitive filsystems Add 'core.ignorecase' option Make hash_name_lookup able to do case-independent lookups Make "index_name_exists()" return the cache_entry it found Move name hashing functions into a file of its own Make unpack_trees_options bit flags actual bitfields
2008-05-04is_racy_timestamp(): do not check timestamp for gitlinksLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
Because we do not even check the timestamp to determie if a gitlink is up to date or not, triggering the racy-timestamp check for gitlinks does not make sense. This fixes the recently added test in t7506. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-04-12write_index(): optimize ce_smudge_racily_clean_entry() calls with CE_UPTODATELibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
When writing the index out, we need to check the work tree again to see if an entry whose timestamp indicates that it could be "racily clean", in order to smudge it if it is stat-clean but with modified contents. However, we can skip this step for entries marked with CE_UPTODATE, which are known to be the really clean (i.e. the one we already have checked when we prepared the index). This will reduce lstat(2) calls necessary in git-status. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-04-09Make git-add behave more sensibly in a case-insensitive environmentLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-1/+36
This expands on the previous patch, and allows "git add" to sanely handle a filename that has changed case, keeping the case in the index constant, and avoiding aliases. In particular, if you have an index entry called "File", but the checked-out tree is case-corrupted and has an entry called "file" instead, doing a git add . (or naming "file" explicitly) will automatically notice that we have an alias, and will replace the name "file" with the existing index capitalization (ie "File"). However, if we actually have *both* a file called "File" and one called "file", and they don't have the same lstat() information (ie we're on a case-sensitive filesystem but have the "core.ignorecase" flag set), we will error out if we try to add them both. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-04-09When adding files to the index, add support for case-independent matchesLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-7/+5
This simplifies the matching case of "I already have this file and it is up-to-date" and makes it do the right thing in the face of case-insensitive aliases. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-04-09Move name hashing functions into a file of its ownLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-62/+3
It's really totally separate functionality, and if we want to start doing case-insensitive hash lookups, I'd rather do it when it's separated out. It also renames "remove_index_entry()" to "remove_name_hash()", because that really describes the thing better. It doesn't actually remove the index entry, that's done by "remove_index_entry_at()", which is something very different, despite the similarity in names. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-09Add 'const' where appropriate to index handling functionsLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-6/+6
This is in an effort to make the source index of 'unpack_trees()' as being const, and thus making the compiler help us verify that we only access it for reading. The constification also extended to some of the hashing helpers that get called indirectly. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-09Add 'df_name_compare()' helper functionLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-0/+35
This new helper is identical to base_name_compare(), except it compares conflicting directory/file entries as equal in order to help handling DF conflicts (thus the name). Note that while a directory name compares as equal to a regular file with the new helper, they then individually compare _differently_ to a filename that has a dot after the basename (because '\0' < '.' < '/'). So a directory called "foo/" will compare equal to a file "foo", even though "foo.c" will compare after "foo" and before "foo/" This will be used by routines that want to traverse the git namespace but then handle conflicting entries together when possible. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-27Merge branch 'db/checkout'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
* db/checkout: (21 commits) checkout: error out when index is unmerged even with -m checkout: show progress when checkout takes long time while switching branches Add merge-subtree back checkout: updates to tracking report builtin-checkout.c: Remove unused prefix arguments in switch_branches path checkout: work from a subdirectory checkout: tone down the "forked status" diagnostic messages Clean up reporting differences on branch switch builtin-checkout.c: fix possible usage segfault checkout: notice when the switched branch is behind or forked Build in checkout Move code to clean up after a branch change to branch.c Library function to check for unmerged index entries Use diff -u instead of diff in t7201 Move create_branch into a library file Build-in merge-recursive Add "skip_unmerged" option to unpack_trees. Discard "deleted" cache entries after using them to update the working tree Send unpack-trees debugging output to stderr Add flag to make unpack_trees() not print errors. ... Conflicts: Makefile
2008-02-22Name hash fixups: export (and rename) remove_hash_entryLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-16/+2
This makes the name hash removal function (which really just sets the bit that disables lookups of it) available to external routines, and makes read_cache_unmerged() use it when it drops an unmerged entry from the index. It's renamed to remove_index_entry(), and we drop the (unused) 'istate' argument. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-22Fix name re-hashing semanticsLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-5/+9
We handled the case of removing and re-inserting cache entries badly, which is something that merging commonly needs to do (removing the different stages, and then re-inserting one of them as the merged state). We even had a rather ugly special case for this failure case, where replace_index_entry() basically turned itself into a no-op if the new and the old entries were the same, exactly because the hash routines didn't handle it on their own. So what this patch does is to not just have the UNHASHED bit, but a HASHED bit too, and when you insert an entry into the name hash, that involves: - clear the UNHASHED bit, because now it's valid again for lookup (which is really all that UNHASHED meant) - if we're being lazy, we're done here (but we still want to clear the UNHASHED bit regardless of lazy mode, since we can become unlazy later, and so we need the UNHASHED bit to always be set correctly, even if we never actually insert the entry into the hash list) - if it was already hashed, we just leave it on the list - otherwise mark it HASHED and insert it into the list this all means that unhashing and rehashing a name all just works automatically. Obviously, you cannot change the name of an entry (that would be a serious bug), but nothing can validly do that anyway (you'd have to allocate a new struct cache_entry anyway since the name length could change), so that's not a new limitation. The code actually gets simpler in many ways, although the lazy hashing does mean that there are a few odd cases (ie something can be marked unhashed even though it was never on the hash in the first place, and isn't actually marked hashed!). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-09Library function to check for unmerged index entriesLibravatar Daniel Barkalow1-0/+10
It's small, but it was in three places already, so it should be in the library. Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>