summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/merge-recursive.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-04-11Revert "Merge branch 'en/rename-directory-detection'"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1132/+111
This reverts commit e4bb62fa1eeee689744b413e29a50b4d1dae6886, reversing changes made to 468165c1d8a442994a825f3684528361727cd8c0. The topic appears to inflict severe regression in renaming merges, even though the promise of it was that it would improve them. We do not yet know which exact change in the topic was wrong, but in the meantime, let's play it safe and revert it out of 'master' before real Git-using projects are harmed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-04-10Merge branch 'bc/object-id'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-19/+19
Conversion from uchar[20] to struct object_id continues. * bc/object-id: (36 commits) convert: convert to struct object_id sha1_file: introduce a constant for max header length Convert lookup_replace_object to struct object_id sha1_file: convert read_sha1_file to struct object_id sha1_file: convert read_object_with_reference to object_id tree-walk: convert tree entry functions to object_id streaming: convert istream internals to struct object_id tree-walk: convert get_tree_entry_follow_symlinks internals to object_id builtin/notes: convert static functions to object_id builtin/fmt-merge-msg: convert remaining code to object_id sha1_file: convert sha1_object_info* to object_id Convert remaining callers of sha1_object_info_extended to object_id packfile: convert unpack_entry to struct object_id sha1_file: convert retry_bad_packed_offset to struct object_id sha1_file: convert assert_sha1_type to object_id builtin/mktree: convert to struct object_id streaming: convert open_istream to use struct object_id sha1_file: convert check_sha1_signature to struct object_id sha1_file: convert read_loose_object to use struct object_id builtin/index-pack: convert struct ref_delta_entry to object_id ...
2018-04-10Merge branch 'en/rename-directory-detection'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-111/+1132
Rename detection logic in "diff" family that is used in "merge" has learned to guess when all of x/a, x/b and x/c have moved to z/a, z/b and z/c, it is likely that x/d added in the meantime would also want to move to z/d by taking the hint that the entire directory 'x' moved to 'z'. A bug causing dirty files involved in a rename to be overwritten during merge has also been fixed as part of this work. * en/rename-directory-detection: (29 commits) merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed file merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renames directory rename detection: new testcases showcasing a pair of bugs merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite cases merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renames merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renames merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include trees merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new name merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & merging merge-recursive: check for directory level conflicts merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames() merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renames merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairs merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obvious merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairs merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logic merge-recursive: move the get_renames() function directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting dirty files directory rename detection: tests for handling overwriting untracked files ...
2018-03-21Merge branch 'rj/warning-uninitialized-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Compilation fix. * rj/warning-uninitialized-fix: read-cache: fix an -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning -Wuninitialized: remove some 'init-self' workarounds
2018-03-20-Wuninitialized: remove some 'init-self' workaroundsLibravatar Ramsay Jones1-1/+1
The 'self-initialised' variables construct (ie <type> var = var;) has been used to silence gcc '-W[maybe-]uninitialized' warnings. This has, unfortunately, caused MSVC to issue 'uninitialized variable' warnings. Also, using clang static analysis causes complaints about an 'Assigned value is garbage or undefined'. There are six such constructs in the current codebase. Only one of the six causes gcc to issue a '-Wmaybe-uninitialized' warning (which will be addressed elsewhere). The remaining five 'init-self' gcc workarounds are noted below, along with the commit which introduced them: 1. builtin/rev-list.c: 'reaches' and 'all', see commit 457f08a030 ("git-rev-list: add --bisect-vars option.", 2007-03-21). 2. merge-recursive.c:2064 'mrtree', see commit f120ae2a8e ("merge- recursive.c: mrtree in merge() is not used before set", 2007-10-29). 3. fast-import.c:3023 'oe', see commit 85c62395b1 ("fast-import: let importers retrieve blobs", 2010-11-28). 4. fast-import.c:3006 'oe', see commit 28c7b1f7b7 ("fast-import: add a get-mark command", 2015-07-01). Remove the 'self-initialised' variable constructs noted above. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-14sha1_file: convert read_sha1_file to struct object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-2/+2
Convert read_sha1_file to take a pointer to struct object_id and rename it read_object_file. Do the same for read_sha1_file_extended. Convert one use in grep.c to use the new function without any other code change, since the pointer being passed is a void pointer that is already initialized with a pointer to struct object_id. Update the declaration and definitions of the modified functions, and apply the following semantic patch to convert the remaining callers: @@ expression E1, E2, E3; @@ - read_sha1_file(E1.hash, E2, E3) + read_object_file(&E1, E2, E3) @@ expression E1, E2, E3; @@ - read_sha1_file(E1->hash, E2, E3) + read_object_file(E1, E2, E3) @@ expression E1, E2, E3, E4; @@ - read_sha1_file_extended(E1.hash, E2, E3, E4) + read_object_file_extended(&E1, E2, E3, E4) @@ expression E1, E2, E3, E4; @@ - read_sha1_file_extended(E1->hash, E2, E3, E4) + read_object_file_extended(E1, E2, E3, E4) Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-14tree-walk: convert tree entry functions to object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-6/+6
Convert get_tree_entry and find_tree_entry to take pointers to struct object_id. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-14strbuf: convert strbuf_add_unique_abbrev to use struct object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-1/+1
Convert the declaration and definition of strbuf_add_unique_abbrev to make it take a pointer to struct object_id. Predeclare the struct in strbuf.h, as cache.h includes strbuf.h before it declares the struct, and otherwise the struct declaration would have the wrong scope. Apply the following semantic patch, along with the standard object_id transforms, to adjust the callers: @@ expression E1, E2, E3; @@ - strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(E1, E2.hash, E3); + strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(E1, &E2, E3); @@ expression E1, E2, E3; @@ - strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(E1, E2->hash, E3); + strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(E1, E2, E3); Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-14tree: convert read_tree_recursive to struct object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-1/+1
Convert the callback functions for read_tree_recursive to take a pointer to struct object_id. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-01write_locked_index(): add flag to avoid writing unchanged indexLibravatar Martin Ågren1-3/+2
We have several callers like if (active_cache_changed && write_locked_index(...)) handle_error(); rollback_lock_file(...); where the final rollback is needed because "!active_cache_changed" shortcuts the if-expression. There are also a few variants of this, including some if-else constructs that make it more clear when the explicit rollback is really needed. Teach `write_locked_index()` to take a new flag SKIP_IF_UNCHANGED and simplify the callers. Leave the most complicated of the callers (in builtin/update-index.c) unchanged. Rewriting it to use this new flag would end up duplicating logic. We could have made the new flag behave the other way round ("FORCE_WRITE"), but that could break existing users behind their backs. Let's take the more conservative approach. We can still migrate existing callers to use our new flag. Later we might even be able to flip the default, possibly without entirely ignoring the risk to in-flight or out-of-tree topics. Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-28merge-recursive: always roll back lock in `merge_recursive_generic()`Libravatar Martin Ågren1-1/+4
If we return early, or if `active_cache_changed` is false, we forget to roll back the lockfile. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-27merge-recursive: ensure we write updates for directory-renamed fileLibravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+1
When a file is present in HEAD before the merge and the other side of the merge does not modify that file, we try to avoid re-writing the file and making it stat-dirty. However, when a file is present in HEAD before the merge and was in a directory that was renamed by the other side of the merge, we have to move the file to a new location and re-write it. Update the code that checks whether we can skip the update to also work in the presence of directory renames. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-27merge-recursive: avoid spurious rename/rename conflict from dir renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+2
If a file on one side of history was renamed, and merely modified on the other side, then applying a directory rename to the modified side gives us a rename/rename(1to2) conflict. We should only apply directory renames to pairs representing either adds or renames. Making this change means that a directory rename testcase that was previously reported as a rename/delete conflict will now be reported as a modify/delete conflict. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-27merge-recursive: fix remaining directory rename + dirty overwrite casesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+22
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-27merge-recursive: fix overwriting dirty files involved in renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-19/+66
This fixes an issue that existed before my directory rename detection patches that affects both normal renames and renames implied by directory rename detection. Additional codepaths that only affect overwriting of dirty files that are involved in directory rename detection will be added in a subsequent commit. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-27merge-recursive: avoid clobbering untracked files with directory renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+40
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-27merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+186
This commit hooks together all the directory rename logic by making the necessary changes to the rename struct, it's dst_entry, and the diff_filepair under consideration. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-15Merge branch 'jc/merge-symlink-ours-theirs' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+13
"git merge -Xours/-Xtheirs" learned to use our/their version when resolving a conflicting updates to a symbolic link. * jc/merge-symlink-ours-theirs: merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to symbolic link merge
2018-02-15Merge branch 'po/object-id'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
Conversion from uchar[20] to struct object_id continues. * po/object-id: sha1_file: rename hash_sha1_file_literally sha1_file: convert write_loose_object to object_id sha1_file: convert force_object_loose to object_id sha1_file: convert write_sha1_file to object_id notes: convert write_notes_tree to object_id notes: convert combine_notes_* to object_id commit: convert commit_tree* to object_id match-trees: convert splice_tree to object_id cache: clear whole hash buffer with oidclr sha1_file: convert hash_sha1_file to object_id dir: convert struct sha1_stat to use object_id sha1_file: convert pretend_sha1_file to object_id
2018-02-15Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive-fixes'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+20
* en/merge-recursive-fixes: merge-recursive: add explanation for src_entry and dst_entry merge-recursive: fix logic ordering issue Tighten and correct a few testcases for merging and cherry-picking
2018-02-14merge-recursive: when comparing files, don't include treesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-6/+21
get_renames() would look up stage data that already existed (populated in get_unmerged(), taken from whatever unpack_trees() created), and if it didn't exist, would call insert_stage_data() to create the necessary entry for the given file. The insert_stage_data() fallback becomes much more important for directory rename detection, because that creates a mechanism to have a file in the resulting merge that didn't exist on either side of history. However, insert_stage_data(), due to calling get_tree_entry() loaded up trees as readily as files. We aren't interested in comparing trees to files; the D/F conflict handling is done elsewhere. This code is just concerned with what entries existed for a given path on the different sides of the merge, so create a get_tree_entry_if_blob() helper function and use it. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: check for file level conflicts then get new nameLibravatar Elijah Newren1-8/+166
Before trying to apply directory renames to paths within the given directories, we want to make sure that there aren't conflicts at the file level either. If there aren't any, then get the new name from any directory renames. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: add computation of collisions due to dir rename & mergingLibravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+143
directory renaming and merging can cause one or more files to be moved to where an existing file is, or to cause several files to all be moved to the same (otherwise vacant) location. Add checking and reporting for such cases, falling back to no-directory-rename handling for such paths. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: check for directory level conflictsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+119
Before trying to apply directory renames to paths within the given directories, we want to make sure that there aren't conflicts at the directory level. There will be additional checks at the individual file level too, which will be added later. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: add get_directory_renames()Libravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+221
This populates a set of directory renames for us. The set of directory renames is not yet used, but will be in subsequent commits. Note that the use of a string_list for possible_new_dirs in the new dir_rename_entry struct implies an O(n^2) algorithm; however, in practice I expect the number of distinct directories that files were renamed into from a single original directory to be O(1). My guess is that n has a mode of 1 and a mean of less than 2, so, for now, string_list seems good enough for possible_new_dirs. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: make a helper function for cleanup for handle_renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-10/+13
In anticipation of more involved cleanup to come, make a helper function for doing the cleanup at the end of handle_renames. Rename the already existing cleanup_rename[s]() to final_cleanup_rename[s](), name the new helper initial_cleanup_rename(), and leave the big comment in the code about why we can't do all the cleanup at once. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: split out code for determining diff_filepairsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-22/+62
Create a new function, get_diffpairs() to compute the diff_filepairs between two trees. While these are currently only used in get_renames(), I want them to be available to some new functions. No actual logic changes yet. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: make !o->detect_rename codepath more obviousLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+9
Previously, if !o->detect_rename then get_renames() would return an empty string_list, and then process_renames() would have nothing to iterate over. It seems more straightforward to simply avoid calling either function in that case. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: fix leaks of allocated renames and diff_filepairsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-5/+15
get_renames() has always zero'ed out diff_queued_diff.nr while only manually free'ing diff_filepairs that did not correspond to renames. Further, it allocated struct renames that were tucked away in the return string_list. Make sure all of these are deallocated when we are done with them. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: introduce new functions to handle rename logicLibravatar Elijah Newren1-10/+33
The amount of logic in merge_trees() relative to renames was just a few lines, but split it out into new handle_renames() and cleanup_renames() functions to prepare for additional logic to be added to each. No code or logic changes, just a new place to put stuff for when the rename detection gains additional checks. Note that process_renames() records pointers to various information (such as diff_filepairs) into rename_conflict_info structs. Even though the rename string_lists are not directly used once handle_renames() completes, we should not immediately free the lists at the end of that function because they store the information referenced in the rename_conflict_info, which is used later in process_entry(). Thus the reason for a separate cleanup_renames(). Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-14merge-recursive: move the get_renames() functionLibravatar Elijah Newren1-69/+70
Move this function so it can re-use some others (without either moving all of them or adding an annoying split between function declarations and definitions). Cheat slightly by adding a blank line for readability, and in order to silence checkpatch.pl. Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-30sha1_file: convert write_sha1_file to object_idLibravatar Patryk Obara1-2/+3
Convert the definition and declaration of write_sha1_file to struct object_id and adjust usage of this function. This commit also converts static function write_sha1_file_prepare, as it is closely related. Rename these functions to write_object_file and write_object_file_prepare respectively. Replace sha1_to_hex, hashcpy and hashclr with their oid equivalents wherever possible. Signed-off-by: Patryk Obara <patryk.obara@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-23Merge branch 'jc/merge-symlink-ours-theirs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+13
"git merge -Xours/-Xtheirs" learned to use our/their version when resolving a conflicting updates to a symbolic link. * jc/merge-symlink-ours-theirs: merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to symbolic link merge
2018-01-19merge-recursive: add explanation for src_entry and dst_entryLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+19
If I have to walk through the debugger and inspect the values found in here in order to figure out their meaning, despite having known these things inside and out some years back, then they probably need a comment for the casual reader to explain their purpose. Reviewed-By: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-19merge-recursive: fix logic ordering issueLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
merge_trees() did a variety of work, including: * Calling get_unmerged() to get unmerged entries * Calling record_df_conflict_files() with all unmerged entries to do some work to ensure we could handle D/F conflicts correctly * Calling get_renames() to check for renames. An easily overlooked issue is that get_renames() can create more unmerged entries and add them to the list, which have the possibility of being involved in D/F conflicts. So the call to record_df_conflict_files() should really be moved after all the rename detection. I didn't come up with any testcases demonstrating any bugs with the old ordering, but I suspect there were some for both normal renames and for directory renames. Fix the ordering. Reviewed-By: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-09Merge branch 'ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index-maint' into ↵Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index * ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index-maint: merge-recursive: do not look at the index during recursive merge
2018-01-09merge-recursive: do not look at the index during recursive mergeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
When merging another branch into ours, if their tree is the same as the common ancestor's, we can declare that our tree represents the result of three-way merge. In such a case, the recursive merge backend incorrectly used to create a commit out of our index, even when the index has changes. A recent fix attempted to prevent this by adding a comparison between "our" tree and the index, but forgot that this check must be restricted only to the outermost merge. Inner merges performed by the recursive backend across merge bases are by definition made from scratch without having any local changes added to the index. The call to index_has_changes() during an inner merge is working on the index that has no relation to the merge being performed, preventing legitimate merges from getting carried out. Fix it by limiting the check to the outermost merge. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-03merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to symbolic link mergeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+13
The -Xours/-Xtheirs merge options were originally defined as a way to "force" the resolution of 3way textual merge conflicts to take one side without using your editor, hence did not even trigger in situations where you would normally not get the <<< === >>> conflict markers. This was improved for binary files back in 2012 with a944af1d ("merge: teach -Xours/-Xtheirs to binary ll-merge driver", 2012-09-08). Teach a similar trick to the codepath that deals with merging two conflicting changes to symbolic links. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Tested-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-22Merge branch 'ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index-maint' into ↵Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index * ew/empty-merge-with-dirty-index-maint: merge-recursive: avoid incorporating uncommitted changes in a merge move index_has_changes() from builtin/am.c to merge.c for reuse t6044: recursive can silently incorporate dirty changes in a merge
2017-12-22merge-recursive: avoid incorporating uncommitted changes in a mergeLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+7
builtin/merge.c contains this important requirement for merge strategies: /* * At this point, we need a real merge. No matter what strategy * we use, it would operate on the index, possibly affecting the * working tree, and when resolved cleanly, have the desired * tree in the index -- this means that the index must be in * sync with the head commit. The strategies are responsible * to ensure this. */ merge-recursive does not do this check directly, instead it relies on unpack_trees() to do it. However, merge_trees() has a special check for the merge branch exactly matching the merge base; when it detects that situation, it returns early without calling unpack_trees(), because it knows that the HEAD commit already has the correct result. Unfortunately, it didn't check that the index matched HEAD, so after it returned, the outer logic ended up creating a merge commit that included something other than HEAD. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-19Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive-icase-removal'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The code internal to the recursive merge strategy was not fully prepared to see a path that is renamed to try overwriting another path that is only different in case on case insensitive systems. This does not matter in the current code, but will start to matter once the rename detection logic starts taking hints from nearby paths moving to some directory and moves a new path along with them. * en/merge-recursive-icase-removal: merge-recursive: ignore_case shouldn't reject intentional removals
2017-12-13Merge branch 'bc/hash-algo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
An infrastructure to define what hash function is used in Git is introduced, and an effort to plumb that throughout various codepaths has been started. * bc/hash-algo: repository: fix a sparse 'using integer as NULL pointer' warning Switch empty tree and blob lookups to use hash abstraction Integrate hash algorithm support with repo setup Add structure representing hash algorithm setup: expose enumerated repo info
2017-11-27Merge branch 'sb/test-cherry-pick-submodule-getting-in-a-way'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
The three-way merge performed by "git cherry-pick" was confused when a new submodule was added in the meantime, which has been fixed (or "papered over"). * sb/test-cherry-pick-submodule-getting-in-a-way: merge-recursive: handle addition of submodule on our side of history t/3512: demonstrate unrelated submodule/file conflict as cherry-pick failure
2017-11-27Merge branch 'jc/ignore-cr-at-eol'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
The "diff" family of commands learned to ignore differences in carriage return at the end of line. * jc/ignore-cr-at-eol: diff: --ignore-cr-at-eol xdiff: reassign xpparm_t.flags bits
2017-11-27merge-recursive: ignore_case shouldn't reject intentional removalsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
In commit ae352c7f3 (merge-recursive.c: fix case-changing merge bug, 2014-05-01), it was observed that removing files could be problematic on case insensitive file systems, because we could end up removing files that differed in case only rather than deleting the intended file -- something that happened when files were renamed on one branch in a way that differed only in case. To avoid that problem, that commit added logic to avoid removing files other than the one intended, rejecting the removal if the files differed only in case. Unfortunately, the logic it used didn't fully implement that condition as stated above; instead it merely checked that a case-insensitive lookup of the file that was requested resulted in finding a file in the index at stage 0, not that the file found in the index actually differed in case. Alternatively, one could view the implementation as making an implicit assumption that the file we actually wanted to remove would never appear in the index with a stage of 0, and thus that if we found a file with our lookup, that it had to be a different file (but different in case only). The net result of this implementation is that it can ignore more requests than it should, leaving a file around in the working copy that should have been removed. Make sure that the file found in the index actually differs in case before silently ignoring the request to remove the file. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-15merge-recursive: handle addition of submodule on our side of historyLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+3
The code for a newly added path assumed that the path was a normal file, and thus checked for there being a directory still being in the way of the file. Note that since unpack_trees() does path-in-the-way checks already, the only way for there to be a directory in the way at this point in the code, is if there is some kind of D/F conflict in the merge. For a submodule addition on HEAD's side of history, the submodule would have already been present. This means that we do expect there to be a directory present but should not consider it to be "in the way"; instead, it's the expected submodule. So, when there's a submodule addition from HEAD's side, don't bother checking the working copy for a directory in the way. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-15Merge branch 'ao/merge-verbosity-getenv-just-once'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+4
Code cleanup. * ao/merge-verbosity-getenv-just-once: merge-recursive: check GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY only once
2017-11-13Switch empty tree and blob lookups to use hash abstractionLibravatar brian m. carlson1-1/+1
Switch the uses of empty_tree_oid and empty_blob_oid to use the current_hash abstraction that represents the current hash algorithm in use. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-09Merge branch 'bw/diff-opt-impl-to-bitfields'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
A single-word "unsigned flags" in the diff options is being split into a structure with many bitfields. * bw/diff-opt-impl-to-bitfields: diff: make struct diff_flags members lowercase diff: remove DIFF_OPT_CLR macro diff: remove DIFF_OPT_SET macro diff: remove DIFF_OPT_TST macro diff: remove touched flags diff: add flag to indicate textconv was set via cmdline diff: convert flags to be stored in bitfields add, reset: use DIFF_OPT_SET macro to set a diff flag
2017-11-08diff: --ignore-cr-at-eolLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
A new option --ignore-cr-at-eol tells the diff machinery to treat a carriage-return at the end of a (complete) line as if it does not exist. Just like other "--ignore-*" options to ignore various kinds of whitespace differences, this will help reviewing the real changes you made without getting distracted by spurious CRLF<->LF conversion made by your editor program. Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> [jch: squashed in command line completion by Dscho] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>