summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/merge-recursive.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-08-06ll-merge: let caller decide whether to renormalizeLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+1
Add a “renormalize” bit to the ll-merge options word so callers can decide on a case-by-case basis whether the merge is likely to have overlapped with a change in smudge/clean rules. This reveals a few commands that have not been taking that situation into account, though it does not fix them. No functional change intended. Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Improved-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06ll-merge: make flag easier to populateLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+2
ll_merge() takes its options in a flag word, which has a few advantages: - options flags can be cheaply passed around in registers, while an option struct passed by pointer cannot; - callers can easily pass 0 without trouble for no options, while an option struct passed by value would not allow that. The downside is that code to populate and access the flag word can be somewhat opaque. Mitigate that with a few macros. Cc: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Cc: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06merge-trees: let caller decide whether to renormalizeLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+2
Add a "renormalize" option to struct merge_options so callers can decide on a case-by-case basis whether the merge is likely to have overlapped with a change in smudge/clean rules. The option defaults to the global merge_renormalize setting for now. No change in behavior intended. Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06merge-trees: push choice to renormalize away from low levelLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+5
The merge machinery decides whether to resmudge and clean relevant entries based on the global merge_renormalize setting, which is set by "git merge" based on its configuration (and left alone by other commands). A nicer interface would make that decision a parameter to merge_trees so callers would pass in a choice made on a call-by-call basis. Start by making blob_unchanged stop examining the merge_renormalize global. In other words, this change is a trivial no-op, but it brings us closer to something good. Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-02Try normalizing files to avoid delete/modify conflicts when mergingLibravatar Eyvind Bernhardsen1-2/+49
If a file is modified due to normalization on one branch, and deleted on another, a merge of the two branches will result in a delete/modify conflict for that file even if it is otherwise unchanged. Try to avoid the conflict by normalizing and comparing the "base" file and the modified file when their sha1s differ. If they compare equal, the file is considered unmodified and is deleted. Signed-off-by: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-08Merge branch 'pc/remove-warn'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* pc/remove-warn: Remove a redundant errno test in a usage of remove_path Introduce remove_or_warn function Implement the rmdir_or_warn function Generalise the unlink_or_warn function
2010-03-28Remove a redundant errno test in a usage of remove_pathLibravatar Peter Collingbourne1-1/+1
The errno test is redundant because the same test is carried out in remove_path itself. Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <peter@pcc.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-20merge-recursive: add a label for ancestorLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+1
git merge-recursive (and hence git merge) will present conflict hunks in output something like what ‘diff3 -m’ produces if the merge.conflictstyle configuration option is set to diff3. There is a small difference from diff3: diff3 -m includes a label for the merge base on the ||||||| line. Tools familiar with the format and humans unfamiliar with the format both can benefit from such a label. So mark the start of the text from the merge bases with the heading "||||||| merged common ancestors". It would be nicer to use a more informative label. Perhaps someone will provide one some day. git rerere does not have trouble parsing the new output, and its preimage ids are unchanged since it has its own code for re-creating conflict hunks. No other code in git parses conflict hunks. Requested-by: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-20merge_trees(): add ancestor label parameter for diff3-style outputLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+8
Commands using the merge_trees() machinery will present conflict hunks in output something like what ‘diff3 -m’ produces if the merge.conflictstyle configuration option is set to diff3. The output lacks the name of the merge base on the ||||||| line of the output, and tools can misparse the conflict hunks without it. Add a new o->ancestor parameter to merge_trees() for use as a label for the ancestor in conflict hunks. If o->ancestor is NULL, the output format is as before. All callers pass NULL for now. If o->ancestor is non-NULL and both branches renamed the base file to the same name, that name is included in the conflict hunk labels. Even if o->ancestor is NULL I think this would be a good change, but this patch only does it in the non-NULL case to ensure the output format does not change where it might matter. Requested-by: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-20ll_merge(): add ancestor label parameter for diff3-style outputLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Commands using the ll_merge() function will present conflict hunks imitating ‘diff3 -m’ output if the merge.conflictstyle configuration option is set appropriately. Unlike ‘diff3 -m’, the output does not include a label for the merge base on the ||||||| line of the output, and some tools misparse the conflict hunks without that. Add a new ancestor_label parameter to ll_merge() to give callers the power to rectify this situation. If ancestor_label is NULL, the output format is unchanged. All callers pass NULL for now. Requested-by: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-17refactor duplicated fill_mm() in checkout and merge-recursiveLibravatar Michael Lukashov1-20/+3
The following function is duplicated: fill_mm Move it to xdiff-interface.c and rename it 'read_mmblob', as suggested by Junio C Hamano. Also, change parameters order for consistency with read_mmfile(). Signed-off-by: Michael Lukashov <michael.lukashov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-21Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
* maint: merge-recursive: do not return NULL only to cause segfault retry request without query when info/refs?query fails
2010-01-21merge-recursive: do not return NULL only to cause segfaultLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
merge-recursive calls write_tree_from_memory() to come up with a virtual tree, with possible conflict markers inside the blob contents, while merging multiple common ancestors down. It is a bug to call the function with unmerged entries in the index, even if the merge to come up with the common ancestor resulted in conflicts. Otherwise the result won't be expressible as a tree object. We _might_ want to suggest the user to set GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY to 5 and re-run the merge in the message. At least we will know which part of process_renames() or process_entry() functions is not correctly handling the unmerged paths, and it might help us diagnosing the issue. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-20Merge branch 'ap/merge-backend-opts'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-10/+29
* ap/merge-backend-opts: Document that merge strategies can now take their own options Extend merge-subtree tests to test -Xsubtree=dir. Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive. pull: Fix parsing of -X<option> Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-merge git merge -X<option> git-merge-file --ours, --theirs Conflicts: git-compat-util.h
2010-01-17Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+11
This makes "subtree" more orthogonal to the rest of recursive merge, so that you can use subtree and ours/theirs features at the same time. For example, you can now say: git merge -s subtree -Xtheirs other to merge with "other" branch while shifting it up or down to match the shape of the tree of the current branch, and resolving conflicts favoring the changes "other" branch made over changes made in the current branch. It also allows the prefix used to shift the trees to be specified using the "-Xsubtree=$prefix" option. Giving an empty prefix tells the command to figure out how much to shift trees automatically as we have always done. "merge -s subtree" is the same as "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree=" (or "merge -s recursive -Xsubtree"). Based on an old patch done back in the days when git-merge was a script; Avery ported the script part to builtin-merge.c. Bugs in shift_tree() is mine. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-17git merge -X<option>Libravatar Avery Pennarun1-2/+19
Teach "-X <option>" command line argument to "git merge" that is passed to strategy implementations. "ours" and "theirs" autoresolution introduced by the previous commit can be asked to the recursive strategy. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-30Merge branch 'mm/maint-merge-ff-error-message-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-18/+23
Conflicts: merge-recursive.c
2009-11-29merge-recursive: make the error-message generation an extern functionLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-13/+18
The construction of the struct unpack_trees_error_msgs was done within git_merge_trees(), which prevented using the same messages easily from another function. [jc: backported for 1.6.5 maint before advice_commit_before_merge] Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-23Merge branch 'mm/maint-hint-failed-merge'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+7
* mm/maint-hint-failed-merge: user-manual: Document that "git merge" doesn't like uncommited changes. merge-recursive: point the user to commit when file would be overwritten.
2009-11-22merge-recursive: point the user to commit when file would be overwritten.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+7
The commit-before-pull is well accepted in the DVCS community, but is confusing some new users. This should get them back in the right way when the problem occurs. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-15Check the format of more printf-type functionsLibravatar Tarmigan Casebolt1-1/+3
We already have these checks in many printf-type functions that have prototypes which are in header files. Add these same checks to some more prototypes in header functions and to static functions in .c files. cc: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Tarmigan Casebolt <tarmigan+git@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-08merge-recursive: give less scary messages when merge did not startLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+21
When unpack_trees() three-way merge logic is called from merge-recursive and finds that local changes are going to be clobbered, its plumbing level messages were given as errors first, and then the merge driver added even more scary message "fatal: merging of trees <a long object name> and <another long object name> failed". This is most often encountered by new CVS/SVN migrants who are used to start a merge from a dirty work tree. The saddest part is that the merge refused to run to prevent _any_ damage from being done to your work tree when these messages are given, but the messages look a lot more scarier than the conflicted case where the user needs to resolve them. Replace the plumbing level messages so that they talk about what it is protecting the user from, and end the messages with "Aborting." so that it becomes clear that the command did not do any harm. The final "merging of trees failed" message is superfluous, unless you are interested in debugging the merge-recursive itself. Squelch the current die() message by default, but allow it to help people who debug git with verbosity level 4 or greater. Unless there is some bug, an inner merge that does not touch working tree should not trigger any such error, so emit the current die() message when we see an error return from it while running the inner merge, too. It would also help people who debug git. We could later add instructions on how to recover (i.e. "stash changes away or commit on a side branch and retry") instead of the silent exit(128) I have in this patch, and then use Peff's advice.* mechanism to squelch it (e.g. "advice.mergeindirtytree"), but they are separate topics. Tested-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-10Merge branch 'jc/maint-merge-recursive-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+25
* jc/maint-merge-recursive-fix: merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashes
2009-07-30merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+25
When a branch moves A to B while the other branch created B (or moved C to B), the code tried to rename one of them to B~something to preserve both versions, and failed to register temporary resolution for the original path B at stage#0 during virtual ancestor computation. This left the index in unmerged state and caused a segfault. A better solution is to merge these two versions of B's in place and use the (potentially conflicting) result as the intermediate merge result in the virtual ancestor. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-06Merge branch 'tr/die_errno'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* tr/die_errno: Use die_errno() instead of die() when checking syscalls Convert existing die(..., strerror(errno)) to die_errno() die_errno(): double % in strerror() output just in case Introduce die_errno() that appends strerror(errno) to die()
2009-07-01Remove filename from conflict markersLibravatar Martin Renold1-2/+7
Put filenames into the conflict markers only when they are different. Otherwise they are redundant information clutter. Print the filename explicitely when warning about a binary conflict. Signed-off-by: Martin Renold <martinxyz@gmx.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-27Convert existing die(..., strerror(errno)) to die_errno()Libravatar Thomas Rast1-3/+3
Change calls to die(..., strerror(errno)) to use the new die_errno(). In the process, also make slight style adjustments: at least state _something_ about the function that failed (instead of just printing the pathname), and put paths in single quotes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-20Fix various sparse warnings in the git source codeLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
There are a few remaining ones, but this fixes the trivial ones. It boils down to two main issues that sparse complains about: - warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Sparse doesn't like you using '0' instead of 'NULL'. For various good reasons, not the least of which is just the visual confusion. A NULL pointer is not an integer, and that whole "0 works as NULL" is a historical accident and not very pretty. A few of these remain: zlib is a total mess, and Z_NULL is just a 0. I didn't touch those. - warning: symbol 'xyz' was not declared. Should it be static? Sparse wants to see declarations for any functions you export. A lack of a declaration tends to mean that you should either add one, or you should mark the function 'static' to show that it's in file scope. A few of these remain: I only did the ones that should obviously just be made static. That 'wt_status_submodule_summary' one is debatable. It has a few related flags (like 'wt_status_use_color') which _are_ declared, and are used by builtin-commit.c. So maybe we'd like to export it at some point, but it's not declared now, and not used outside of that file, so 'static' it is in this patch. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-23Merge branch 'do/maint-merge-recursive-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+6
* do/maint-merge-recursive-fix: merge-recursive: never leave index unmerged while recursing
2009-05-09merge-recursive: never leave index unmerged while recursingLibravatar Dave Olszewski1-5/+6
When you are trying to come up with the final result (i.e. depth=0), you want to record how the conflict arose by registering the state of the common ancestor, your branch and the other branch in the index, hence you want to do update_stages(). When you are merging with positive depth, that is because of a criss-cross merge situation. In such a case, you would need to record the tentative result, with conflict markers and all, as if the merge went cleanly, even if there are conflicts, in order to write it out as a tree object later to be used as a common ancestor tree. update_file() calls update_file_flags() with update_cache=1 to signal that the result needs to be written to the index at stage #0 (i.e. merged), and the code should not clobber the index further by calling update_stages(). The codepath to deal with rename/delete conflict in a recursive merge however left the index unmerged. Signed-off-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-29merge-recursive: do not die on a conflicting submoduleLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+6
We cannot represent the 3-way conflicted state in the work tree for these entries, but it is normal not to have commit objects for them in our repository. Just update the index and the life will be good. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-07Merge branch 'cb/maint-merge-recursive-submodule-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+4
* cb/maint-merge-recursive-submodule-fix: simplify output of conflicting merge update cache for conflicting submodule entries add tests for merging with submodules
2009-04-05simplify output of conflicting mergeLibravatar Clemens Buchacher1-13/+4
This simplifies the code without changing the semantics and removes the unhelpful "needs $sha1" part of the conflicting submodule message. Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-05update cache for conflicting submodule entriesLibravatar Clemens Buchacher1-2/+3
When merging merge bases during a recursive merge we do not want to leave any unmerged entries. Otherwise we cannot create a temporary tree for the recursive merge to work with. We failed to do so in case of a submodule conflict between merge bases, causing a NULL pointer dereference in the next step of the recursive merge. Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-15Fix various dead stores found by the clang static analyzerLibravatar Benjamin Kramer1-8/+3
http-push.c::finish_request(): request is initialized by the for loop index-pack.c::free_base_data(): b is initialized by the for loop merge-recursive.c::process_renames(): move compare to narrower scope, and remove unused assignments to it remove unused variable renames2 xdiff/xdiffi.c::xdl_recs_cmp(): remove unused variable ec xdiff/xemit.c::xdl_emit_diff(): xche is always overwritten Signed-off-by: Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-07tree.c: allow read_tree_recursive() to traverse gitlink entriesLibravatar Lars Hjemli1-1/+1
When the callback function invoked from read_tree_recursive() returns the value `READ_TREE_RECURSIVE` for a gitlink entry, the traversal will now continue into the tree connected to the gitlinked commit. This functionality can be used to allow inter-repository operations, but since the current users of read_tree_recursive() does not yet support such operations, they have been modified where necessary to make sure that they never return READ_TREE_RECURSIVE for gitlink entries (hence no change in behaviour should be introduces by this patch alone). Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-13Merge branch 'js/maint-merge-recursive-r-d-conflict' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
* js/maint-merge-recursive-r-d-conflict: merge-recursive: mark rename/delete conflict as unmerged
2009-01-13Merge branch 'cb/maint-merge-recursive-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+32
* cb/maint-merge-recursive-fix: merge-recursive: do not clobber untracked working tree garbage modify/delete conflict resolution overwrites untracked file Conflicts: builtin-merge-recursive.c
2009-01-07Merge branch 'js/maint-merge-recursive-r-d-conflict'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
* js/maint-merge-recursive-r-d-conflict: merge-recursive: mark rename/delete conflict as unmerged
2008-12-24merge-recursive: mark rename/delete conflict as unmergedLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+5
When a file was renamed in one branch, but deleted in the other, one should expect the index to contain an unmerged entry, namely the target of the rename. Make it so. Noticed by Constantine Plotnikov. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-15Merge branch 'cb/maint-merge-recursive-fix' into cb/merge-recursive-fixLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+32
* cb/maint-merge-recursive-fix: merge-recursive: do not clobber untracked working tree garbage modify/delete conflict resolution overwrites untracked file
2008-12-04Report symlink failures in merge-recursiveLibravatar Alex Riesen1-1/+2
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-23merge-recursive: use strbuf_expand() instead of interpolate()Libravatar René Scharfe1-1/+0
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-19git-merge-recursive: honor merge.conflictstyle once againLibravatar Matt McCutchen1-1/+1
This was originally implemented in c236bcd06138bcbc929b86ad1a513635bf4847b2 but was lost to a mismerge in 9ba929ed652f5ed7707f1c684999af4ad02c4925. Signed-off-by: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-12Replace calls to strbuf_init(&foo, 0) with STRBUF_INIT initializerLibravatar Brandon Casey1-2/+1
Many call sites use strbuf_init(&foo, 0) to initialize local strbuf variable "foo" which has not been accessed since its declaration. These can be replaced with a static initialization using the STRBUF_INIT macro which is just as readable, saves a function call, and takes up fewer lines. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-29Merge branch 'bc/master-diff-hunk-header-fix'Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-16/+1
* bc/master-diff-hunk-header-fix: Clarify commit error message for unmerged files Use strchrnul() instead of strchr() plus manual workaround Use remove_path from dir.c instead of own implementation Add remove_path: a function to remove as much as possible of a path git-submodule: Fix "Unable to checkout" for the initial 'update' Clarify how the user can satisfy stash's 'dirty state' check. t4018-diff-funcname: test syntax of builtin xfuncname patterns t4018-diff-funcname: test syntax of builtin xfuncname patterns make "git remote" report multiple URLs diff hunk pattern: fix misconverted "\{" tex macro introducers diff: fix "multiple regexp" semantics to find hunk header comment diff: use extended regexp to find hunk headers diff: use extended regexp to find hunk headers diff.*.xfuncname which uses "extended" regex's for hunk header selection diff.c: associate a flag with each pattern and use it for compiling regex diff.c: return pattern entry pointer rather than just the hunk header pattern Conflicts: builtin-merge-recursive.c t/t7201-co.sh xdiff-interface.h
2008-09-26Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-3/+1
* maint: Remove empty directories in recursive merge Documentation: clarify the details of overriding LESS via core.pager Conflicts: builtin-merge-recursive.c
2008-09-26Cleanup remove_pathLibravatar Alex Riesen1-5/+3
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-05merge-recursive: get rid of virtual_idLibravatar Miklos Vajna1-5/+1
We now just leave the object->sha1 field of virtual commits 0{40} as it is initialized, as a unique hash is not necessary in case of virtual commits. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-04merge-recursive: move current_{file,directory}_set to struct merge_optionsLibravatar Miklos Vajna1-27/+30
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>