Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
I'm totally stupid and got it backwards, sorry about that.
git-merge-cache -q would mean it's noisy and quiet without any
parameters.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
git-merge-cache reporting failed merge program is undesirable for
Cogito, since it emits its own more appropriate error message in that
case. However, I want to show other possible git-merge-cache error
messages. So -q will just silence this particular error.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
|
|
Fixes all in-code names that leaved during "big name change".
Signed-off-by: Alexey Nezhdanov <snake@penza-gsm.ru>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
When you pass git-merge-cache the -o option, it tries to do all the
automatic merges and possibly return error if any of them failed, instead
of the default behaviour of failing immediately after the first failed
automatic merge.
Ported from the Cogito branch - Cogito needs this behaviour.
|
|
fails, but go on and return error code at the end. It makes sense
to try to merge everything, then let the user solve the commits
at once.
|
|
1) permissions aren't respected in the merge script (primarily because
they're never passed in to it in the first place). Fix that and also
check for permission conflicts in the merge
2) the delete of a file in both branches may indeed be just that, but it
could also be the indicator of a rename conflict (file moved to
different locations in both branches), so error out and ask the
committer for guidance.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
instead of a checked-out temporary copy.
If merging requires a checked-out-copy, we now do so with "unpack-file".
|
|
any unmerged files.
This one doesn't actually do the merging, but it makes it
easy to script the programs that do using it.
|