summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-stash.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2011-05-04Merge branch 'jk/maint-stash-oob' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+1
* jk/maint-stash-oob: stash: fix false positive in the invalid ref test. stash: fix accidental apply of non-existent stashes Conflicts: t/t3903-stash.sh
2011-05-04Merge branch 'dm/stash-k-i-p' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+5
* dm/stash-k-i-p: stash: ensure --no-keep-index and --patch can be used in any order stash: add two more tests for --no-keep-index
2011-04-07stash: ensure --no-keep-index and --patch can be used in any orderLibravatar Dan McGee1-4/+5
Don't assume one comes after the other on the command line. Use a three-state variable to track and check its value accordingly. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-06stash: drop dirty worktree check on applyLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+1
Before we apply a stash, we make sure there are no changes in the worktree that are not in the index. This check dates back to the original git-stash.sh, and is presumably intended to prevent changes in the working tree from being accidentally lost during the merge. However, this check has two problems: 1. It is overly restrictive. If my stash changes only file "foo", but "bar" is dirty in the working tree, it will prevent us from applying the stash. 2. It is redundant. We don't touch the working tree at all until we actually call merge-recursive. But it has its own (much more accurate) checks to avoid losing working tree data, and will abort the merge with a nicer message telling us which paths were problems. So we can simply drop the check entirely. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-05stash: fix accidental apply of non-existent stashesLibravatar Jeff King1-11/+1
Once upon a time, "git rev-parse ref@{9999999}" did not generate an error. Therefore when we got an invalid stash reference in "stash apply", we could end up not noticing until quite late. Commit b0f0ecd (detached-stash: work around git rev-parse failure to detect bad log refs, 2010-08-21) handled this by checking for the "Log for stash has only %d entries" warning on stderr when we validated the ref. A few days later, e6eedc3 (rev-parse: exit with non-zero status if ref@{n} is not valid., 2010-08-24) fixed the original issue. That made the extra stderr test superfluous, but also introduced a new bug. Now the early call to: git rev-parse --symbolic "$@" fails, but we don't notice the exit code. Worse, its empty output means we think the user didn't provide us a ref, and we try to apply stash@{0}. This patch checks the rev-parse exit code and fails early in the revision parsing process. We can also get rid of the stderr test; as a bonus, this means that "stash apply" can now run under GIT_TRACE=1 properly. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-23Merge branch 'pk/stash-apply-status-relative'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* pk/stash-apply-status-relative: Add test: git stash shows status relative to current dir git stash: show status relative to current directory
2011-03-17stash: copy the index using --index-output instead of cp -pLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-6/+5
'git stash create' must operate with a temporary index. For this purpose, it used 'cp -p' to create a copy. -p is needed to preserve the timestamp of the index file. Now Jakob Pfender reported a certain combination of a Linux NFS client, OpenBSD NFS server, and cp implementation where this operation failed. Luckily, the first operation in git-stash after copying the index is to call 'git read-tree'. Therefore, use --index-output instead of 'cp -p' to write the copy of the index. --index-output requires that the specified file is on the same volume as the source index, so that the lock file can be rename()d. For this reason, the name of the temporary index is constructed in a way different from the other temporary files. The code path of 'stash -p' also needs a temporary index, but we do not use the new name because it does not depend on the same precondition as --index-output. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-17stash: fix incorrect quoting in cleanup of temporary filesLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-1/+1
The * was inside the quotes, so that the pattern was never expanded and the temporary files were never removed. As a consequence, 'stash -p' left a .git-stash-*-patch file in $GIT_DIR. Other code paths did not leave files behind because they removed the temporary file themselves, at least in non-error paths. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-14git stash: show status relative to current directoryLibravatar Piotr Krukowiecki1-1/+2
git status shows modified paths relative to current directory, so it's possible to copy&paste them directly, even if you're in a subdirectory. But "git stash apply" always shows status from root of git repository. This is misleading because you can't use the paths without modifications. This is caused by changing directory to root of repository at the beginning of git stash. This patch makes git stash show status relative to current directory. Instead of removing the "cd to toplevel", which would affect whole script and might have other side-effects, the fix is to change directory temporarily back to original dir just before displaying status. Signed-off-by: Piotr Krukowiecki <piotr.krukowiecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-13shell portability: no "export VAR=VAL"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
It is more portable to say "VAR=VAL && export VAR" instead. Noticed by Ævar. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29stash: simplify parsing fixesLibravatar Jon Seymour1-21/+7
This patch simplifies Brian's fix for the recent regression by: * eliminating the extra loop * eliminating use of git rev-parse for parsing flags * making use of the for opt idiom for the retained loop * eliminating the redundant -- case The patch has been tested with the tests in current maint. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29stash: fix git stash branch regression when branch creation failsLibravatar Jon Seymour1-3/+3
"git stash branch <branch> <stash>" started discarding the stash when the branch creation fails. It should have kept the stash intact when aborting. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-26git-stash: fix flag parsingLibravatar Brian Gernhardt1-4/+11
Currently git-stash uses `git rev-parse --no-revs -- "$@"` to set its FLAGS variable. This is the same as `FLAGS="-- $@"`. It should use `git rev-parse --no-revs --flags "$@"`, but that eats any "-q" or "--quiet" argument. So move the check for quiet before rev-parse. Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <brian@gernhardtsoftware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: simplify git stash showLibravatar Jon Seymour1-12/+2
This commit refactors git stash show to make use of the assert_stash_like function. git show now dies if the presented argument is non-stash-like. Previous behaviour was to tolerate commits that were not even stash-like. Previously, git stash show would accept stash-like arguments, but only if there was a stash on the stack. Now, git stash accepts stash-like arguments always and only fails if no stash-like argument is specified and there is no stash stack. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: simplify git stash branchLibravatar Jon Seymour1-10/+7
This patch teaches git stash branch to tolerate stash-like arguments. In particular, a stash is only required if an argument isn't specified and the stash is only dropped if a stash entry reference was specified or implied. The implementation has been simplified by taking advantage of assert_stash_like() and the variables established by parse_flags_and_rev(). Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: refactor git stash pop implementationLibravatar Jon Seymour1-4/+8
git stash pop is abstracted into its own implementation function - pop_stash. The behaviour is changed so that git stash pop fails early if the the specified stash reference does not exist or does not refer to an extant entry in the reflog of the reference stash. This fixes the case where the apply succeeds, but the drop fails. Previously this caused caused git stash pop to exit with a non-zero exit code and a dirty tree. Now, git stash pop fails with a non-zero exit code, but the working tree is not modified. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: simplify stash_dropLibravatar Jon Seymour1-28/+3
Previously, git stash drop would fail noisily while executing git reflog delete if the specified revision was not a stash reference. Now, git stash drop fails with an error message which more precisely indicates the reason for failure. Furthermore, git stash drop will now fail with a non-zero status code if stash@{n} specifies a stash log entry that does not actually exist. This change in behaviour is achieved by delegating argument parsing to the common parse_flags_and_rev() function (via a call to assert_stash_ref). Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: simplify stash_applyLibravatar Jon Seymour1-35/+3
The implementation of stash_apply() is simplified to take advantage of the common parsing function parse_flags_and_rev(). Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: work around git rev-parse failure to detect bad log refsLibravatar Jon Seymour1-0/+9
This commit is required because git rev-parse in 1.7.2 does not correctly indicate invalid log references using a non-zero status code. We use a proxy for the condition (non-empty error output) as a substitute. This commit can be reverted when, and if, rev-parse is fixed to indicate invalid log references with a status code. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-21detached-stash: introduce parse_flags_and_revs functionLibravatar Jon Seymour1-0/+124
Introduce parse_flags_and_revs. This function requires that there is at most one stash-like revision parameter and zero or more flags. It knows how to parse -q,--quiet and --index flags, but leaves other flags parsed. Specified revisions are checked to see that they are at least stash-like (meaning: they look like something created by git stash save or git stash create). If this is so, then IS_STASH_LIKE is initialized to a non-empty value. If the specified revision also looks like a stash log entry reference, then IS_STASH_REF is initialized to a non-empty value. References of the form ref@{spec} are required to precisely identify an individual commit. If no reference is specified, stash@{0} is assumed. Once the specified reference is validated to be at least stash_like an ensemble of derived variables, (w_commit, w_tree, b_commit, etc) is initialized with a single call to git rev-parse. Repeated calls to parse_flags_and_rev() avoid repeated calls to git rev-parse if the specified arguments have already been parsed. Subsequent patches in the series modify the existing git stash subcommands to make use of these functions as appropriate. An ensemble of supporting functions that make use of the state established by parse_flags_and_rev(). These are described below: The ancillary functions are: is_stash_like(): which can be used to test whether a specified commit looks like a commit created with git stash save or git stash create. assert_stash_like(): which can be used by commands that misbehave unless their arguments stash-like. is_stash_ref(): which checks whether an argument is valid stash reference(e.g. is of the form ['refs/']stash['@{'something'}]) assert_stash_ref(): which can be used by commands that misbehave unless their arguments are both stash-like and refer to valid stash entries. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-21Merge branch 'cb/maint-stash-orphaned-file'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* cb/maint-stash-orphaned-file: stash tests: stash can lose data in a file removed from the index stash: Don't overwrite files that have gone from the index
2010-05-08Merge branch 'sd/log-decorate'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* sd/log-decorate: log.decorate: only ignore it under "log --pretty=raw" script with rev-list instead of log log --pretty/--oneline: ignore log.decorate log.decorate: usability fixes Add `log.decorate' configuration variable. git_config_maybe_bool() Conflicts: builtin/log.c
2010-04-18stash: Don't overwrite files that have gone from the indexLibravatar Charles Bailey1-1/+1
The use of git add -u in create_stash isn't always complete. In particular, if a file has been removed from the index but changed in the work tree it will not be added to the stash's saved work tree tree object. When stash then resets the work tree to match HEAD, any changes will be lost. To be complete, any work tree file which differs from HEAD needs to be saved, regardless of whether it still appears in the index or not. This is achieved with a combination of a diff against HEAD and a call to update-index with an explicit list of paths that have changed. Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-08script with rev-list instead of logLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
Because log.decorate now shows decorations for --pretty=oneline, we must explicitly turn it off when scripting. Otherwise, users with log.decorate set will get cruft like: $ git stash Saved working directory and index state WIP on master: 2c1f7f5 (HEAD, master) commit subject Instead of adding --no-decorate to the log command line, let's just use the rev-list plumbing interface instead, which does the right thing. git-submodule has a similar call. Since it just counts the commit lines, nothing is broken, but let's switch it, too, for the sake of consistency and cleanliness. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-16Improve error messages from 'git stash show'Libravatar Gustaf Hendeby1-2/+6
The previous error message "fatal: Needed a single revision" is not very informative. Signed-off-by: Gustaf Hendeby <hendeby@isy.liu.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-06stash: suggest the correct command line for unknown options.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-16Merge branch 'maint-1.6.5' into maint-1.6.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+5
* maint-1.6.5: dwim_ref: fix dangling symref warning stash pop: remove 'apply' options during 'drop' invocation diff: make sure --output=/bad/path is caught
2010-02-15stash pop: remove 'apply' options during 'drop' invocationLibravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+5
The 'git stash pop' option parsing used to remove the first argument in --index mode. At the time this was implemented, this first argument was always --index. However, since the invention of the -q option in fcdd0e9 (stash: teach quiet option, 2009-06-17) you can cause an internal invocation of git stash drop --index by running git stash pop -q --index which then of course fails because drop doesn't know --index. To handle this, instead let 'git stash apply' decide what the future argument to 'drop' should be. Warning: this means that 'git stash apply' must parse all options that 'drop' can take, and deal with them in the same way. This is currently true for its only option -q. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-02stash: mention --patch in usage string.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-19stash list: drop the default limit of 10 stashesLibravatar Thomas Rast1-5/+0
'git stash list' had an undocumented limit of 10 stashes, unless other git-log arguments were specified. This surprised at least one user, but possibly served to cut the output below a screenful without using a pager. Since the last commit, 'git stash list' will fire up a pager according to the same rules as the 'git log' it calls, so we can drop the limit. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-19stash list: use new %g formats instead of sedLibravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+1
With the new formats, we can rewrite 'git stash list' in terms of an appropriate pretty format, instead of hand-editing with sed. This has the advantage that it obeys the normal settings for git-log, notably the pager. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-07Merge branch 'tr/reset-checkout-patch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-20/+93
* tr/reset-checkout-patch: stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown options Make test case number unique tests: disable interactive hunk selection tests if perl is not available DWIM 'git stash save -p' for 'git stash -p' Implement 'git stash save --patch' Implement 'git checkout --patch' Implement 'git reset --patch' builtin-add: refactor the meat of interactive_add() Add a small patch-mode testing library git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode code Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'
2009-09-01stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown optionsLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-4/+23
With the earlier DWIM patches, certain combination of options defaulted to the "save" command correctly while certain equally valid combination did not. For example, "git stash -k" were Ok but "git stash -q -k" did not work. This makes the logic of defaulting to "save" much simpler. If there are no non-flag arguments, it is clear that there is no command word, and we default to "save" subcommand. This rule prevents "git stash -q apply" from quietly creating a stash with "apply" as the message. This also teaches "git stash save" to reject an unknown option. This is to keep a mistyped "git stash save --quite" from creating a stash with a message "--quite", and this safety is more important with the new logic to default to "save" with any option-looking argument without an explicit comand word. [jc: this is based on Matthieu's 3-patch series, and a follow-up discussion, and he and Peff take all the credit; if I have introduced bugs while reworking, they are mine.] Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15DWIM 'git stash save -p' for 'git stash -p'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15Merge branch 'js/stash-dwim' into tr/reset-checkout-patchLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+9
* commit 'tr/reset-checkout-patch^^2': Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'
2009-08-15Implement 'git stash save --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-14/+66
This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from the difference between HEAD and worktree, and git-stash will build a stash that reflects these changes. The index state of the stash is the same as your current index, and we also let --patch imply --keep-index. Note that because the selected hunks are rolled back from the worktree but not the index, the resulting state may appear somewhat confusing if you had also staged these changes. This is not entirely satisfactory, but due to the way stashes are applied, other solutions would require a change to the stash format. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-14git stash: Give friendlier errors when there is nothing to applyLibravatar Ori Avtalion1-11/+16
The change makes sure a stash (given or default) exists before checking if the working tree is dirty. If the default stash is requested, the old message was scary and included a 'fatal' error from rev-parse: fatal: Needed a single revision : no valid stashed state found It is replaced with a friendlier 'Nothing to apply' error, similar to 'git stash branch'. If a specific stash is specified, the 'Needed a single revision' errors from rev-parse are suppressed. Signed-off-by: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name> Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Acked-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-31Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-7/+9
To save me from the carpal tunnel syndrome, make 'git stash' accept the short option '-k' instead of '--keep-index', and for even more convenience, let's DWIM when this developer forgot to type the 'save' command. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-22git stash: modernize use of "dashed" git-XXX callsLibravatar Martin Koegler1-3/+3
Replace remaining git-XXX calls with git XXX. Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-18stash: teach quiet optionLibravatar Stephen Boyd1-17/+61
Teach stash pop, apply, save, and drop to be quiet when told. By using the quiet option (-q), these actions will be silent unless errors are encountered. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-09Documentation: mention 'git stash pop --index' option explicitlyLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-2/+2
'git stash pop' supports the '--index' option since its initial implementation (bd56ff54, git-stash: add new 'pop' subcommand, 2008-02-22), but its documentation does not mention it explicitly. Moreover, both the usage shown by 'git stash -h' and the synopsis section in the man page imply that 'git stash pop' does not have an '--index' option. First, this patch corrects the usage and the synopsis section. Second, the patch moves the description of the '--index' option to the 'git stash pop' section in the documentation, and refers to it from the 'git stash apply' section. This way it follows the intentions of commit d1836637 (Documentation: teach stash/pop workflow instead of stash/apply, 2009-05-28), as all 'git stash pop'-related documentation will be in one place without references to 'git stash apply'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-07Revert "git-stash: use git rev-parse -q"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+6
This reverts commit 757c7f60a78004fc3d0ea62f44320d54ef430c10 as an unnecessary error message to pop up when the last stash entry is dropped. It simply is not worth the aggravation.
2008-12-02git-stash: use git rev-parse -qLibravatar Miklos Vajna1-6/+6
Don't redirect stderr to /dev/null, use -q to suppress the output on stderr. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-09git-stash.sh: fix flawed fix of invalid ref handling (commit da65e7c1)Libravatar Brandon Casey1-18/+4
The referenced commit tried to fix a flaw in stash's handling of a user supplied invalid ref. i.e. 'git stash apply fake_ref@{0}' should fail instead of applying stash@{0}. But, it did so in a naive way by avoiding the use of the --default option of rev-parse, and instead manually supplied the default revision if the user supplied an empty command line. This prevented a common usage scenario of supplying flags on the stash command line (i.e. non-empty command line) which would be parsed by lower level git commands, without supplying a specific revision. This should fall back to the default revision, but now it causes an error. e.g. 'git stash show -p' The correct fix is to use the --verify option of rev-parse, which fails properly if an invalid ref is supplied, and still allows falling back to a default ref when one is not supplied. Convert stash-drop to use --verify while we're at it, since specifying multiple revisions for any of these commands is also an error and --verify makes it so. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-29Clarify how the user can satisfy stash's 'dirty state' check.Libravatar Stephen Haberman1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-24git-stash.sh: don't default to refs/stash if invalid ref suppliedLibravatar Brandon Casey1-2/+15
apply_stash() and show_stash() each call rev-parse with '--default refs/stash' as an argument. This option causes rev-parse to operate on refs/stash if it is not able to successfully operate on any element of the command line. This includes failure to supply a "valid" revision. This has the effect of causing 'stash apply' and 'stash show' to operate as if stash@{0} had been supplied when an invalid revision is supplied. e.g. 'git stash apply stash@{1}' would fall back to 'git stash apply stash@{0}' This patch modifies these two functions so that they avoid using the --default option of rev-parse. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-06stash: refresh the index before deciding if the work tree is dirtyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
Unlike the case where the user does have a real change in the work tree, refusing to work because of unclean stat information is not very helpful. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Acked-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
2008-08-16git-stash: improve synopsis in help and manual pageLibravatar Stephan Beyer1-1/+7
"git stash -h" showed some incomplete and ugly usage information. For example, the useful "--keep-index" option for "save" or the "--index" option for "apply" were not shown. Also in the documentation synopsis they were not shown, so that there is no incentive to scroll down and even see that such options exist. This patch improves the git-stash synopsis in the documentation by mentioning that further options to the stash commands and then copies this synopsis to the usage information string of git-stash.sh. For the latter, the dashless git command string has to be inserted on the second and the following usage lines. The code of this is taken from git-sh-setup so that all lines will show the command string. Note that the "create" command is not advertised at all now, because it was not mentioned in git-stash.txt. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-05bash completion: More completions for 'git stash'Libravatar Lee Marlow1-1/+1
Add branch subcommand to completions and USAGE for git-stash.sh. Complete stash names for show, apply, drop, pop, and branch. Add "--index" long option for apply. Signed-off-by: Lee Marlow <lee.marlow@gmail.com> Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-23stash save: fix parameter handlingLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
A command line "git stash save --keep-index I was doing this" was misparsed and keep-index codepath did not trigger. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>