summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-repack.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-03-11Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack: is_kept_pack(): final clean-up Simplify is_kept_pack() Consolidate ignore_packed logic more has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info" has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface git-repack: resist stray environment variable
2009-02-28Simplify is_kept_pack()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+4
This removes --unpacked=<packfile> parameter from the revision parser, and rewrites its use in git-repack to pass a single --kept-pack-only option instead. The new --kept-pack-only option means just that. When this option is given, is_kept_pack() that used to say "not on the --unpacked=<packfile> list" now says "the packfile has corresponding .keep file". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28git-repack: resist stray environment variableLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
The script used $args and $existing without initializing it to empty. It would have been confused by an environment variable the end user had before running it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-11Make repack less likely to corrupt repositoryLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-20/+67
Some platforms refuse to rename a file that is open. When repacking an already packed repository without adding any new object, the resulting pack will contain the same set of objects as an existing pack, and on such platforms, a newly created packfile cannot replace the existing one. The logic detected this issue but did not try hard enough to recover from it. Especially because the files that needs renaming come in pairs, there potentially are different failure modes that one can be renamed but the others cannot. Asking manual recovery to end users were error prone. This patch tries to make it more robust by first making sure all the existing files that need to be renamed have been renamed before continuing, and attempts to roll back if some failed to rename. This is based on an initial patch by Robin Rosenberg. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-14repack: only unpack-unreachable if we are deleting redundant packsLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+2
The -A option calls pack-objects with the --unpack-unreachable option so that the unreachable objects in local packs are left in the local object store loose. But if the -d option to repack was _not_ used, then these unpacked loose objects are redundant and unnecessary. Update tests in t7701. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-12repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A]Libravatar Brandon Casey1-7/+4
When repack is called with either the -a or -A option, the user has requested to repack all objects including those referenced by the alternates mechanism. Currently, if there are no local packs without .keep files, then repack will call pack-objects with the '--unpacked --incremental' options which causes it to exclude alternate packed objects. So, remove this fallback. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-12repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep fileLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+1
If the user created a .keep file for a local pack, then it can be inferred that the user does not want those objects repacked. This fixes the repack bug tested by t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-19git-repack uses --no-repack-object, not --no-repack-delta.Libravatar Mikael Magnusson1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13Make usage strings dash-lessLibravatar Stephan Beyer1-1/+1
When you misuse a git command, you are shown the usage string. But this is currently shown in the dashed form. So if you just copy what you see, it will not work, when the dashed form is no longer supported. This patch makes git commands show the dash-less version. For shell scripts that do not specify OPTIONS_SPEC, git-sh-setup.sh generates a dash-less usage string now. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-25repack.usedeltabaseoffset config option now defaults to "true"Libravatar Nicolas Pitre1-5/+1
As announced for 1.6.0. Access over the native protocol by old git versions is unaffected as this capability is negociated by the protocol. Otherwise setting this config option to "false" and doing a 'git repack -a -d' is enough to remain compatible with ancient git versions (older than 1.4.4). Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-31Remove now unnecessary 'sync()' callsLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-1/+0
Since the pack-files are now always created stably on disk, there is no need to sync() before pruning lose objects or old stale pack-files. [jc: with Nico's clean-up] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-23Merge branch 'bc/repack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
* bc/repack: Documentation/git-repack.txt: document new -A behaviour let pack-objects do the writing of unreachable objects as loose objects add a force_object_loose() function builtin-gc.c: deprecate --prune, it now really has no effect git-gc: always use -A when manually repacking repack: modify behavior of -A option to leave unreferenced objects unpacked Conflicts: builtin-pack-objects.c
2008-05-13let pack-objects do the writing of unreachable objects as loose objectsLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-15/+7
Commit ccc1297226b184c40459e9d373cc9eebfb7bd898 changed the behavior of 'git repack -A' so unreachable objects are stored as loose objects. However it did so in a naive and inn efficient way by making packs about to be deleted inaccessible and feeding their content through 'git unpack-objects'. While this works, there are major flaws with this approach: - It is unacceptably sloooooooooooooow. In the Linux kernel repository with no actual unreachable objects, doing 'git repack -A -d' before: real 2m33.220s user 2m21.675s sys 0m3.510s And with this change: real 0m36.849s user 0m24.365s sys 0m1.950s For reference, here's the timing for 'git repack -a -d': real 0m35.816s user 0m22.571s sys 0m2.011s This is explained by the fact that 'git unpack-objects' was used to unpack _every_ objects even if (almost) 100% of them were thrown away. - There is a black out period. Between the removal of the .idx file for the redundant pack and the completion of its unpacking, the unreachable objects become completely unaccessible. This is not a big issue as we're talking about unreachable objects, but some consistency is always good. - There is no way to easily set a sensible mtime for the newly created unreachable loose objects. So, while having a command called "pack-objects" to perform object unpacking looks really odd, this is probably the best compromize to be able to solve the above issues in an efficient way. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-11repack: modify behavior of -A option to leave unreferenced objects unpackedLibravatar Brandon Casey1-5/+13
The previous behavior of the -A option was to retain any previously packed objects which had become unreferenced, and place them into the newly created pack file. Since git-gc, when run automatically with the --auto option, calls repack with the -A option, this had the effect of retaining unreferenced packed objects indefinitely. To avoid this scenario, the user was required to run git-gc with the little known --prune option or to manually run repack with the -a option. This patch changes the behavior of the -A option so that unreferenced objects that exist in any pack file being replaced, will be unpacked into the repository. The unreferenced loose objects can then be garbage collected by git-gc (i.e. git-prune) based on the gc.pruneExpire setting. Also add new tests for checking whether unreferenced objects which were previously packed are properly left in the repository unpacked after repacking. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-11git-repack: re-enable parsing of -n command line optionLibravatar A Large Angry SCM1-0/+1
In commit 5715d0b (Migrate git-repack.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt, 2007-11-04), parsing of the '-n' command line option was accidentally lost when git-repack.sh was migrated to use git-rev-parse --parseopt. This adds it back. Signed-off-by: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-05Migrate git-repack.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseoptLibravatar Pierre Habouzit1-5/+19
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-19Stop displaying "Pack pack-$ID created." during git-gcLibravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-3/+0
Discussion on the list tonight came to the conclusion that showing the name of the packfile we just created during git-repack is not a very useful message for any end-user. For the really technical folk who need to have the name of the newest packfile they can use something such as `ls -t .git/objects/pack | head -2` to find the most recently created packfile. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-10-03Merge branch 'jc/autogc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+11
* jc/autogc: git-gc --auto: run "repack -A -d -l" as necessary. git-gc --auto: restructure the way "repack" command line is built. git-gc --auto: protect ourselves from accumulated cruft git-gc --auto: add documentation. git-gc --auto: move threshold check to need_to_gc() function. repack -A -d: use --keep-unreachable when repacking pack-objects --keep-unreachable Export matches_pack_name() and fix its return value Invoke "git gc --auto" from commit, merge, am and rebase. Implement git gc --auto
2007-09-23Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiomLibravatar David Kastrup1-1/+1
A lot of shell scripts contained stuff starting with while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac and similar. I consider breaking out of the condition instead of the body od the loop ugly, and the implied "true" value of the non-matching case is not really obvious to humans at first glance. It happens not to be obvious to some BSD shells, either, but that's because they are not POSIX-compliant. In most cases, this has been replaced by a straight condition using "test". "case" has the advantage of being faster than "test" on vintage shells where "test" is not a builtin. Since none of them is likely to run the git scripts, anyway, the added readability should be worth the change. A few loops have had their termination condition expressed differently. Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-17repack -A -d: use --keep-unreachable when repackingLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+11
This is a safer variant of "repack -a -d" that does not drop unreachable objects that are in packs. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-12Add --window-memory option to git-repackLibravatar Brian Downing1-1/+2
Signed-off-by: Brian Downing <bdowning@lavos.net> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-04repack: don't report "Nothing new to pack." if -q is givenLibravatar Uwe Kleine-König1-1/+3
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-05-24Ensure git-repack -a -d --max-pack-size=N deletes correct packsLibravatar Dana How1-2/+3
The packfile portion of the "remove redundant" code near the bottom of git-repack.sh is broken when pack splitting occurs. Particularly since this is the only place where we automatically delete packfiles, make sure it works properly for all cases, old or new. Signed-off-by: Dana L. How <danahow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-20git-repack --max-pack-size: add option parsing to enable featureLibravatar Dana L. How1-6/+8
Add --max-pack-size parsing and usage messages. Upgrade git-repack.sh to handle multiple packfile names, and build packfiles in GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY not GIT_DIR. Update documentation. Signed-off-by: Dana L. How <danahow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-10make "repack -f" imply "pack-objects --no-reuse-object"Libravatar Nicolas Pitre1-3/+3
Recomputing delta is much more expensive than recompressing anyway, and when the user says 'repack -f', it is a sign that the user is willing to spend CPU cycles. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-28[PATCH] Rename git-repo-config to git-config.Libravatar Tom Prince1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Tom Prince <tom.prince@ualberta.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-12Make git-prune-packed a bit more chatty.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Steven Grimm noticed that git-repack's verbosity is inconsistent because pack-objects is chatty and prune-packed is not. This makes the latter a bit more chatty and gives -q option to squelch it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-20Teach git-repack to preserve objects referred to by reflog entries.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This adds a new option --reflog to pack-objects and revision machinery; do not bother documenting it for now, since this is only useful for local repacking. When the option is passed, objects reachable from reflog entries are marked as interesting while computing the set of objects to pack. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-13repacked packs should be read-onlyLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-0/+2
... just like the other pack creating tools do. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-10-29Only repack active packs by skipping over kept packs.Libravatar Shawn Pearce1-10/+17
During `git repack -a -d` only repack objects which are loose or which reside in an active (a non-kept) pack. This allows the user to keep large packs as-is without continuous repacking and can be very helpful on large repositories. It should also help us resolve a race condition between `git repack -a -d` and the new pack store functionality in `git-receive-pack`. Kept packs are those which have a corresponding .keep file in $GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY/pack. That is pack-X.pack will be kept (not repacked and not deleted) if pack-X.keep exists in the same directory when `git repack -a -d` starts. Currently this feature is not documented and there is no user interface to keep an existing pack. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-10-22Merge branch 'np/pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+10
* np/pack: add the capability for index-pack to read from a stream index-pack: compare only the first 20-bytes of the key. git-repack: repo.usedeltabaseoffset pack-objects: document --delta-base-offset option allow delta data reuse even if base object is a preferred base zap a debug remnant let the GIT native protocol use offsets to delta base when possible make pack data reuse compatible with both delta types make git-pack-objects able to create deltas with offset to base teach git-index-pack about deltas with offset to base teach git-unpack-objects about deltas with offset to base introduce delta objects with offset to base
2006-10-13git-repack: repo.usedeltabaseoffsetLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+10
When configuration variable `repack.UseDeltaBaseOffset` is set for the repository, the command passes `--delta-base-offset` option to `git-pack-objects`; this typically results in slightly smaller packs, but the generated packs are incompatible with versions of git older than (and including) v1.4.3. We will make it default to true sometime in the future, but not for a while. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-24git-repack: allow git-repack to run in subdirectoryLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+1
Now that we explicitly create all tmpfiles below $GIT_DIR, there's no reason to care about which directory we're in. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-20repack: use only pack-objects, not rev-list.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+4
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-06git-repack: create new packs inside $GIT_DIR, not cwdLibravatar Martin Langhoff1-4/+7
Avoid failing when cwd is !writable by writing the packfiles in $GIT_DIR, which is more in line with other commands. Without this, git-repack was failing when run from crontab by non-root user accounts. For large repositories, this also makes the mv operation a lot cheaper, and avoids leaving temp packfiles around the fs upon failure. Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-29Check if pack directory exists prior to descending into itLibravatar Matthias Kestenholz1-1/+1
This fixes the following warning: git-repack: line 42: cd: .git/objects/pack: No such file or directory This happens only, when git-repack -a is run without any packs in the repository. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kestenholz <matthias@spinlock.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-12git-repack: avoid redirecting stderr into git-pack-objectsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
We are trying to catch error condition of git-rev-list and cause the downstream pack-objects to barf, but if you run rev-list with anything that mucks with its stderr (such as GIT_TRACE), any stderr output would cause the pipeline to fail. [jc: originally from Matthias Lederhofer, with a reworded error message.] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-25git-repack: Be careful when updating the same pack as an existing one.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+18
After a clone, packfiles are read-only by default and "mv" to replace the pack with a new one goes interactive, asking if the user wants to replace it. If one is successfully moved and the other is not, the pack and its idx would become out-of-sync and corrupts the repository. Recovering is straightforward -- it is just the matter of finding the remaining .tmp-pack-* and make sure they are both moved -- but we should be extra careful not to do something so alarming to the users. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-24git-repack -- respect -q and be quietLibravatar Martin Langhoff1-2/+3
git-repack was passing the -q along to pack-objects but ignoring it itself. Correct the oversight. Signed-off-by: Martin Langhoff <martin@catalyst.net.nz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-07Merge branch 'fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+7
* fix: repack: honor -d even when no new pack was created clone: keep --reference even with -l -s repo-config: document what value_regexp does a bit more clearly. Release config lock if the regex is invalid core-tutorial.txt: escape asterisk
2006-05-07repack: honor -d even when no new pack was createdLibravatar Martin Waitz1-7/+7
If all objects are reachable via an alternate object store then we still have to remove all obsolete local packs. Signed-off-by: Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-19Allow "git repack" users to specify repacking window/depthLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-3/+5
.. but don't even bother documenting it. I don't think any normal person is supposed to ever really care, but it simplifies testing when you want to use the "git repack" wrapper rather than forcing you to use the core programs (which already do support the window/depth arguments, of course). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-04-02fix repacking with lots of tagsLibravatar Jim Radford1-3/+1
Use git-rev-list's --all instead of git-rev-parse's to keep from hitting the shell's argument list length limits when repacking with lots of tags. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-10repack: prune loose objects when -d is givenLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
[jc: the request originally came from Martin Atukunda, which was improved further by Alex Riesen] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-02-17git-repack: allow passing a couple of flags to pack-objects.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+7
A new flag -q makes underlying pack-objects less chatty. A new flag -f forces delta to be recomputed from scratch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-12-14git-repack: Usage string clean-up, emit usage at incorrect invocationLibravatar freku045@student.liu.se1-1/+2
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-25git-sh-setup: die if outside git repository.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Now all the users of this script detect its exit status and die, complaining that it is outside git repository. So move the code that dies from all callers to git-sh-setup script. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-21git-repack: Properly abort in corrupt repositoryLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
In a corrupt repository, git-repack produces a pack that does not contain needed objects without complaining, and the result of this combined with -d flag can be very painful -- e.g. a lossage of one tree object can lead to lossage of blobs reachable only through that tree. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-19git-repack: do not do complex redundancy check.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-21/+14
With "-a", redundant pack removal is trivial, and otherwise redundant pack removal is pointless; do not call git-redundant-pack from this script. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>