summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-rebase.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2008-03-16Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Start draft ReleaseNotes for 1.5.4.5 rebase -m: do not trigger pre-commit verification Conflicts: RelNotes
2008-03-16rebase -m: do not trigger pre-commit verificationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
When rebasing changes that contain issues that the pre-commit hook flags as problematic, the rebase cannot be continued. However, rebase is about transplanting commits that are already made with as little distortion as possible, and pre-commit check should not interfere. Earlier, c5b09fe (Avoid update hook during git-rebase --interactive, 2007-12-19) fixed "rebase -i", but "rebase -m" shared the same issue. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-11git rebase --abort: always restore the right commitLibravatar Mike Hommey1-3/+2
Previously, --abort would end by git resetting to ORIG_HEAD, but some commands, such as git reset --hard (which happened in git rebase --skip, but could just as well be typed by the user), would have already modified ORIG_HEAD. Just use the orig-head we store in $dotest instead. [jc: cherry-picked from 48411d and 4947cf9 on 'master'] Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-10update 'git rebase' documentationLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-2/+1
Being in the project's top directory when starting or continuing a rebase is not necessary since 533b703 (Allow whole-tree operations to be started from a subdirectory, 2007-01-12). Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-05am: --rebasingLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The new option --rebasing is used internally for rebase to tell am that it is being used for its purpose. This would leave .dotest/rebasing to help "completion" scripts tell if the ongoing operation is am or rebase. Also the option at the same time stands for --binary, -3 and -k which are always given when rebase drives am as its backend. Using the information "am" leaves, git-completion.bash tells ongoing rebase and am apart. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-01git rebase --abort: always restore the right commitLibravatar Mike Hommey1-3/+2
Previously, --abort would end by git resetting to ORIG_HEAD, but some commands, such as git reset --hard (which happened in git rebase --skip, but could just as well be typed by the user), would have already modified ORIG_HEAD. Just use the orig-head we store in $dotest instead. Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-28Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
* maint: scripts: do not get confused with HEAD in work tree Improve description of git-branch -d and -D in man page.
2007-11-28scripts: do not get confused with HEAD in work treeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
When you have a file called HEAD in your work tree, many commands that our scripts feed "HEAD" to would complain about the rev vs path ambiguity. A solution is to form command line more carefully by appending -- to them, which makes it clear that we mean HEAD rev not HEAD file. This patch would apply to maint. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-24Merge branch 'mh/rebase-skip-hard'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* mh/rebase-skip-hard: Do git reset --hard HEAD when using git rebase --skip
2007-11-17Merge branch 'ph/parseopt-sh'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* ph/parseopt-sh: git-quiltimport.sh fix --patches handling git-am: -i does not take a string parameter. sh-setup: don't let eval output to be shell-expanded. git-sh-setup: fix parseopt `eval` string underquoting Give git-am back the ability to add Signed-off-by lines. git-rev-parse --parseopt scripts: Add placeholders for OPTIONS_SPEC Migrate git-repack.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt Migrate git-quiltimport.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt Migrate git-checkout.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt --keep-dashdash Migrate git-instaweb.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt Migrate git-merge.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt Migrate git-am.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt Migrate git-clone to use git-rev-parse --parseopt Migrate git-clean.sh to use git-rev-parse --parseopt. Update git-sh-setup(1) to allow transparent use of git-rev-parse --parseopt Add a parseopt mode to git-rev-parse to bring parse-options to shell scripts.
2007-11-12rebase: fix "rebase --continue" breakageLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+5
The --skip case was handled properly when rebasing without --merge, but the --continue case was not. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-11Do git reset --hard HEAD when using git rebase --skipLibravatar Mike Hommey1-0/+1
When you have a merge conflict and want to bypass the commit causing it, you don't want to care about the dirty state of the working tree. Also, don't git reset --hard HEAD in the rebase-skip test, so that the lack of support for this is detected. Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-09rebase: operate on a detached HEADLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-5/+51
The interactive version of rebase does all the operations on a detached HEAD, so that after a successful rebase, <branch>@{1} is the pre-rebase state. The reflogs of "HEAD" still show all the actions in detail. This teaches the non-interactive version to do the same. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-06scripts: Add placeholders for OPTIONS_SPECLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
--text follows this line-- These commands currently lack OPTIONS_SPEC; allow people to easily list with "git grep 'OPTIONS_SPEC=$'" what they can help improving. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-02Fixing path quoting in git-rebaseLibravatar Jonathan del Strother1-13/+13
git-rebase used to fail when run from a path containing a space. Signed-off-by: Jonathan del Strother <jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-10-18Fixing path quoting in git-rebaseLibravatar Jonathan del Strother1-13/+13
git-rebase used to fail when run from a path containing a space. Signed-off-by: Jonathan del Strother <jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-09-23Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
* maint: git-svn: don't attempt to spawn pager if we don't want one Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiom User Manual: add a chapter for submodules user-manual: don't assume refs are stored under .git/refs Detect exec bit in more cases. Conjugate "search" correctly in the git-prune-packed man page. Move the paragraph specifying where the .idx and .pack files should be Documentation/git-lost-found.txt: drop unnecessarily duplicated name.
2007-09-23Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiomLibravatar David Kastrup1-3/+2
A lot of shell scripts contained stuff starting with while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac and similar. I consider breaking out of the condition instead of the body od the loop ugly, and the implied "true" value of the non-matching case is not really obvious to humans at first glance. It happens not to be obvious to some BSD shells, either, but that's because they are not POSIX-compliant. In most cases, this has been replaced by a straight condition using "test". "case" has the advantage of being faster than "test" on vintage shells where "test" is not a builtin. Since none of them is likely to run the git scripts, anyway, the added readability should be worth the change. A few loops have had their termination condition expressed differently. Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-07git-rebase: fix -C optionLibravatar J. Bruce Fields1-1/+0
The extra shift here causes failure to parse any commandline including the -C option. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-07git-rebase: support --whitespace=<option>Libravatar J. Bruce Fields1-1/+4
Pass --whitespace=<option> to git-apply. Since git-apply and git-am expect this, I'm always surprised when I try to give it to git-rebase and it doesn't work. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-01Avoid one-or-more (\+) non BRE in sed scripts.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-01rebase -m: Fix incorrect short-logs of already applied commits.Libravatar Johannes Sixt1-5/+8
When a topic branch is rebased, some of whose commits are already cherry-picked upstream: o--X--A--B--Y <- master \ A--B--Z <- topic then 'git rebase -m master' would report: Already applied: 0001 Y Already applied: 0002 Y With this fix it reports the expected: Already applied: 0001 A Already applied: 0002 B As an added bonus, this change also avoids 'echo' of a commit message, which might contain escapements. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-06Enable "git rerere" by the config variable rerere.enabledLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-9/+3
Earlier, "git rerere" was enabled by creating the directory .git/rr-cache. That is definitely not in line with most other features, which are enabled by a config variable. So, check the config variable "rerere.enabled". If it is set to "false" explicitely, do not activate rerere, even if .git/rr-cache exists. This should help when you want to disable rerere temporarily. If "rerere.enabled" is not set at all, fall back to detection of the directory .git/rr-cache. [jc: with minimum tweaks] Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-04Allow rebase to run if upstream is completely mergedLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-3/+5
Consider this history: o--o-...-B <- origin \ \ x--x--M--x--x <- master In this situation, rebase considers master fully up-to-date and would not do anything. However, if there were additional commits on origin, the rebase would run and move the commits x on top of origin. Here we change rebase to short-circuit out only if the history since origin is strictly linear. Consequently, the above as well as a history like this would be linearized: o--o <- origin \ x--x \ \ x--M--x--x <- master Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-02Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-19/+19
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-24Teach rebase an interactive modeLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+11
Don't you just hate the fact sometimes, that git-rebase just applies the patches, without any possibility to edit them, or rearrange them? With "--interactive", git-rebase now lets you edit the list of patches, so that you can reorder, edit and delete patches. Such a list will typically look like this: pick deadbee The oneline of this commit pick fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit ... By replacing the command "pick" with the command "edit", you can amend that patch and/or its commit message, and by replacing it with "squash" you can tell rebase to fold that patch into the patch before that. It is derived from the script sent to the list in <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702252156190.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-02git-rebase: suggest to use git-add instead of git-update-indexLibravatar Jonas Fonseca1-2/+2
The command is part of the main porcelain making git-add more appropriate. Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-10Add colour support in rebase and merge tree diff stats output.Libravatar James Bowes1-1/+2
The rebase and merge commands used diff-tree to display the summary stats of what files had changed from the operation. diff-tree does not read the diff ui configuration options, so the diff.color setting was not used. Have rebase and merge call diff rather than diff-tree, which does read the diff ui options. Signed-off-by: James Bowes <jbowes@dangerouslyinc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-13Use rev-list --reverse in git-rebase.shLibravatar Alex Riesen1-2/+1
...and drop the last perl dependency in the script. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-24Use diff* with --exit-code in git-am, git-rebase and git-merge-oursLibravatar Alex Riesen1-6/+4
This simplifies the shell code, reduces its memory footprint, and speeds things up. The performance improvements should be noticable when git-rebase works on big commits. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-22git-rebase: make 'rebase HEAD branch' work as expected.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
When you want to amend the commit message of 3 commits before the tip of the current branch, say 'master', A--B--C--D--E(master) it is sometimes handy to make your head detached at that commit with: $ git checkout HEAD~3 ;# check out B $ git commit --amend ;# without modifying contents... to create: .B'(HEAD) / A--B--C--D--E(master) and then rebase 'master' branch onto HEAD with this: $ git rebase HEAD master to result in: .B'-C'-D'-E(master=HEAD) / A--B--C--D--E However, the current code interprets HEAD after it switches to the branch 'master', which means the rebase will not do anything. You have to say something unwieldly like this instead: $ git rebase $(git rev-parse HEAD) master This fixes it by expanding the $onto commit name before switching to the target branch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-08add -C[NUM] to git-amLibravatar Michael S. Tsirkin1-1/+6
Add -C[NUM] to git-am and git-rebase so that patches can be applied even if context has changed a bit. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@mellanox.co.il> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-31Improved error message from git-rebaseLibravatar David Kågedal1-1/+2
If the index wasn't clean, git-rebase would simply show the output from git-diff-index with no further comment to the user. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-20git-rebase: allow rebasing a detached HEAD.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+6
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-12Allow whole-tree operations to be started from a subdirectoryLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
This updates five commands (merge, pull, rebase, revert and cherry-pick) so that they can be started from a subdirectory. This may not actually be what we want to do. These commands are inherently whole-tree operations, and an inexperienced user may mistakenly expect a "git pull" from a subdirectory would merge only the subdirectory the command started from. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-10Disallow working directory commands in a bare repository.Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-0/+1
If the user tries to run a porcelainish command which requires a working directory in a bare repository they may get unexpected results which are difficult to predict and may differ from command to command. Instead we should detect that the current repository is a bare repository and refuse to run the command there, as there is no working directory associated with it. [jc: updated Shawn's original somewhat -- bugs are mine.] Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-28Use branch names in 'git-rebase -m' conflict hunks.Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-1/+10
If a three-way merge in git-rebase generates a conflict then we should take advantage of git-merge-recursive's ability to include the branch name of each side of the conflict hunk by setting the GITHEAD_* environment variables. In the case of rebase there aren't really two clear branches; we have the branch we are rebasing onto, and we have the branch we are currently rebasing. Since most conflicts will be arising between the user's current branch and the branch they are rebasing onto we assume the stuff that isn't in the current commit is the "onto" branch and the stuff in the current commit is the "current" branch. This assumption may however come up wrong if the user resolves one conflict in such a way that it conflicts again on a future commit also being rebased. In this case the user's prior resolution will appear to be in the "onto" part of the hunk. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-28Use GIT_REFLOG_ACTION environment variable instead.Libravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-6/+4
Junio rightly pointed out that the --reflog-action parameter was starting to get out of control, as most porcelain code needed to hand it to other porcelain and plumbing alike to ensure the reflog contained the top-level user action and not the lower-level actions it invoked. At Junio's suggestion we are introducing the new set_reflog_action function to all shell scripts, allowing them to declare early on what their default reflog name should be, but this setting only takes effect if the caller has not already set the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION environment variable. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-22merge and reset: adjust for "reset --hard" messagesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
An earlier commit made "reset --hard" chattier but leaking its message from "git rebase" (which calls it when first rewinding the current branch to prepare replaying our own changes) without explanation was confusing, so add an extra message to mention it. Inside restorestate in merge (which is rarely exercised codepath, where more than one strategies are attempted), resetting to the original state uses "reset --hard" -- this can be squelched entirely. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-09rerere: record (or avoid misrecording) resolved, skipped or aborted rebase/amLibravatar Eric Wong1-0/+8
Data in rr-cache isn't valid after a patch application is skipped or and aborted, so our next commit could be misrecorded as a resolution of that skipped/failed commit, which is wrong. git-am --skip, git-rebase --skip/--abort will automatically invoke git-rerere clear to avoid this. Also, since git-am --resolved indicates a resolution was succesful, remember to run git-rerere to record the resolution (and not surprise the user when the next commit is made). Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-21remove merge-recursive-oldLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+0
This frees the Porcelain-ish that comes with the core Python-free. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-10-04git-rebase: Add a -v option to show a diffstat of the changes upstream at ↵Libravatar Robert Shearman1-1/+11
the start of a rebase. Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rob@codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-10-04git-rebase: Use --ignore-if-in-upstream option when executing git-format-patch.Libravatar Robert Shearman1-1/+1
This reduces the number of conflicts when rebasing after a series of patches to the same piece of code is committed upstream. Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rob@codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-24Deprecate merge-recursive.pyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-15/+4
This renames merge-recursive written in Python to merge-recursive-old, and makes merge-recur as a synonym to merge-recursive. We do not remove merge-recur yet, but we will remove merge-recur and merge-recursive-old in a few releases down the road. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-12Merge branch 'master' into js/c-merge-recursiveLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+6
Adjust to hold_lock_file_for_update() change on the master.
2006-07-31rebase: Make the fast-fowarding message more user-friendly by using branch ↵Libravatar Robert Shearman1-1/+1
names instead of SHA1 IDs. Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rob@codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-31rebase: Fix the detection of fast-forwarding of the current branch to upstream.Libravatar Robert Shearman1-8/+5
Previously, a rebasing operation with on a branch that is just tracking an upstream branch would output a confusing "Nothing to do" due to no patches being given to git-am. The test brings the behaviour back into line with that of just before e646c9c8c0aa995eac284ea0a2117add19c4461c. Signed-off-by: Robert Shearman <rob@codeweavers.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-30Merge branch 'js/read-tree' into js/c-merge-recursiveLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+6
* js/read-tree: (107 commits) read-tree: move merge functions to the library read-trees: refactor the unpack_trees() part tar-tree: illustrate an obscure feature better git.c: allow alias expansion without a git directory setup_git_directory_gently: do not barf when GIT_DIR is given. Build on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD Call setup_git_directory() much earlier Call setup_git_directory() early Display an error from update-ref if target ref name is invalid. Fix http-fetch t4103: fix binary patch application test. git-apply -R: binary patches are irreversible for now. Teach git-apply about '-R' Makefile: ssh-pull.o depends on ssh-fetch.c log and diff family: honor config even from subdirectories git-reset: detect update-ref error and report it. lost-found: use fsck-objects --full Teach git-http-fetch the --stdin switch Teach git-local-fetch the --stdin switch Make pull() support fetching multiple targets at once ...
2006-07-13recur vs recursive: help testing without touching too many stuff.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+13
During git-merge-recur development, you could set an environment variable GIT_USE_RECUR_FOR_RECURSIVE to use WIP recur in place of the recursive strategy. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-13Status update on merge-recursive in CLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+2
This is just an update for people being interested. Alex and me were busy with that project for a few days now. While it has progressed nicely, there are quite a couple TODOs in merge-recursive.c, just search for "TODO". For impatient people: yes, it passes all the tests, and yes, according to the evil test Alex did, it is faster than the Python script. But no, it is not yet finished. Biggest points are: - there are still three external calls - in the end, it should not be necessary to write the index more than once (just before exiting) - a lot of things can be refactored to make the code easier and shorter BTW we cannot just plug in git-merge-tree yet, because git-merge-tree does not handle renames at all. This patch is meant for testing, and as such, - it compile the program to git-merge-recur - it adjusts the scripts and tests to use git-merge-recur instead of git-merge-recursive - it provides "TEST", a script to execute the tests regarding -recursive - it inlines the changes to read-cache.c (read_cache_from(), discard_cache() and refresh_cache_entry()) Brought to you by Alex Riesen and Dscho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>