summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-rebase--interactive.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-12-11rebase -i: remember merge options beyond continue actionsLibravatar Fabian Ruch1-11/+7
If the user explicitly specified a merge strategy or strategy options, continue to use that strategy/option after "rebase --continue". Add a test of the corrected behavior. If --merge is specified or implied by -s or -X, then "strategy and "strategy_opts" are set to values from which "strategy_args" can be derived; otherwise they are set to empty strings. Either way, their values are propagated from one step of an interactive rebase to the next via state files. "do_merge", on the other hand, is *not* propagated to later steps of an interactive rebase. Therefore, making the initialization of "strategy_args" conditional on "do_merge" being set prevents later steps of an interactive rebase from setting it correctly. Luckily, we don't need the "do_merge" guard at all. If the rebase was started without --merge, then "strategy" and "strategy_opts" are both the empty string, which results in "strategy_args" also being set to the empty string, which is just what we want in that situation. So remove the "do_merge" guard and derive "strategy_args" from "strategy" and "strategy_opts" every time. Reported-by: Diogo de Campos <campos@esss.com.br> Signed-off-by: Fabian Ruch <bafain@gmail.com> Helped-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-13rebase-i-exec: Allow space in SHELL_PATHLibravatar Fredrik Medley1-1/+1
On Windows, when Git is installed under "C:\Program Files\Git", SHELL_PATH will include a space. Fix "git rebase --interactive --exec" so that it works with spaces in SHELL_PATH. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Medley <fredrik.medley@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-03Merge branch 'gr/rebase-i-drop-warn' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Recent update to "rebase -i" that tries to sanity check the edited insn sheet before it uses it has become too picky on Windows where CRLF left by the editor is turned into a trailing CR on the line read via the "read" built-in command. * gr/rebase-i-drop-warn: rebase-i: work around Windows CRLF line endings t3404: "rebase -i" gets broken when insn sheet uses CR/LF line endings
2015-10-28rebase-i: work around Windows CRLF line endingsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Editors on Windows can and do save text files with CRLF line endings, which is the convention on the platform. We are seeing reports that the "read" command in a port of bash to the environment however does not strip the CRLF at the end, not adjusting for the same convention on the platform. This breaks the recently added sanity checks for the insn sheet fed to "rebase -i"; instead of an empty line (hence nothing in $command), the script was getting a lone CR in there. Special case a lone CR and treat it the same way as an empty line to work this around. This patch (also) passes the test with Git for Windows, where the issue was seen first. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-16Merge branch 'gr/rebase-i-drop-warn' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-35/+31
"git rebase -i" had a minor regression recently, which stopped considering a line that begins with an indented '#' in its insn sheet not a comment, which is now fixed. * gr/rebase-i-drop-warn: rebase-i: loosen over-eager check_bad_cmd check rebase-i: explicitly accept tab as separator in commands
2015-10-05rebase-i: loosen over-eager check_bad_cmd checkLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-33/+29
804098bb (git rebase -i: add static check for commands and SHA-1, 2015-06-29) tried to check all insns before running any in the todo list, but it did so by implementing its own parser that is a lot stricter than necessary. We used to allow lines that are indented (including comment lines), and we used to allow a whitespace between the insn and the commit object name to be HT, among other things, that are flagged as an invalid line by mistake. Fix this by using the same tokenizer that is used to parse the todo list file in the new check. Whether it's a good thing to accept indented comments is debatable (other commands like "git commit" do not accept them), but we already accepted them in the past, and some people and scripts rely on this behavior. Also, a line starting with space followed by a '#' cannot have any meaning other than being a comment, hence it doesn't harm to accept them as comments. Largely based on patch by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> [jc: updated test with quickfix from Torsten Bögershausen] Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-02rebase-i: explicitly accept tab as separator in commandsLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-2/+2
The git-rebase-todo is parsed several times with different parsers. In principle, the user input is normalized by transform_todo_ids and further parsing can be stricter. In case the user wrote pick deadbeef<TAB>commit message the parser of transform_todo_ids was considering the sha1 to be "deadbeef<TAB>commit", and was leaving the tab in the transformed sheet. In practice, this went unnoticed since the actual command interpretation was done later in do_next which did accept the tab as a separator. Make it explicit in the code of transform_todo_ids that tabs are accepted. This way, code that mimicks it will also accept tabs as separator. A similar construct appears in skip_unnecessary_picks, but this one comes after transform_todo_ids, hence reads the normalized format, so it needs not be changed. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-03Merge branch 'gr/rebase-i-drop-warn'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+188
Add "drop commit-object-name subject" command as another way to skip replaying of a commit in "rebase -i", and then punish those who do not use it (and instead just remove the lines) by throwing a warning. * gr/rebase-i-drop-warn: git rebase -i: add static check for commands and SHA-1 git rebase -i: warn about removed commits git-rebase -i: add command "drop" to remove a commit
2015-08-03Merge branch 'mr/rebase-i-customize-insn-sheet'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+17
"git rebase -i"'s list of todo is made configurable. * mr/rebase-i-customize-insn-sheet: git-rebase--interactive.sh: add config option for custom instruction format
2015-07-13Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
Abandoning an already applied change in "git rebase -i" with "--continue" left CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and confused later steps. * js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip: rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behind t3404: demonstrate CHERRY_PICK_HEAD bug
2015-06-30git rebase -i: add static check for commands and SHA-1Libravatar Galan Rémi1-0/+72
Check before the start of the rebasing if the commands exists, and for the commands expecting a SHA-1, check if the SHA-1 is present and corresponds to a commit. In case of error, print the error, stop git rebase and prompt the user to fix with 'git rebase --edit-todo' or to abort. This allows to avoid doing half of a rebase before finding an error and giving back what's left of the todo list to the user and prompt him to fix when it might be too late for him to do so (he might have to abort and restart the rebase). Signed-off-by: Galan Rémi <remi.galan-alfonso@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-30git rebase -i: warn about removed commitsLibravatar Galan Rémi1-3/+114
Check if commits were removed (i.e. a line was deleted) and print warnings or stop git rebase depending on the value of the configuration variable rebase.missingCommitsCheck. This patch gives the user the possibility to avoid silent loss of information (losing a commit through deleting the line in this case) if he wants. Add the configuration variable rebase.missingCommitsCheck. - When unset or set to "ignore", no checking is done. - When set to "warn", the commits are checked, warnings are displayed but git rebase still proceeds. - When set to "error", the commits are checked, warnings are displayed and the rebase is stopped. (The user can then use 'git rebase --edit-todo' and 'git rebase --continue', or 'git rebase --abort') rebase.missingCommitsCheck defaults to "ignore". Signed-off-by: Galan Rémi <remi.galan-alfonso@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-30git-rebase -i: add command "drop" to remove a commitLibravatar Galan Rémi1-1/+2
Instead of removing a line to remove the commit, you can use the command "drop" (just like "pick" or "edit"). It has the same effect as deleting the line (removing the commit) except that you keep a visual trace of your actions, allowing a better control and reducing the possibility of removing a commit by mistake. Signed-off-by: Galan Rémi <remi.galan-alfonso@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-29rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behindLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+5
When skipping commits whose changes were already applied via `git rebase --continue`, we need to clean up said file explicitly. The same is not true for `git rebase --skip` because that will execute `git reset --hard` as part of the "skip" handling in git-rebase.sh, even before git-rebase--interactive.sh is called. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-15git-rebase--interactive.sh: add config option for custom instruction formatLibravatar Michael Rappazzo1-3/+17
A config option 'rebase.instructionFormat' can override the default 'oneline' format of the rebase instruction list. Since the list is parsed using the left, right or boundary mark plus the sha1, they are prepended to the instruction format. Signed-off-by: Michael Rappazzo <rappazzo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-01Merge branch 'mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
"git rebase -i" fired post-rewrite hook when it shouldn't (namely, when it was told to stop sequencing with 'exec' insn). * mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec: t5407: use <<- to align the expected output rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec command rebase -i: demonstrate incorrect behavior of post-rewrite
2015-05-22rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec commandLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-5/+5
Usually, when 'git rebase' stops before completing the rebase, it is to give the user an opportunity to edit a commit (e.g. with the 'edit' command). In such cases, 'git rebase' leaves the sha1 of the commit being rewritten in "$state_dir"/stopped-sha, and subsequent 'git rebase --continue' will call the post-rewrite hook with this sha1 as <old-sha1> argument to the post-rewrite hook. The case of 'git rebase' stopping because of a failed 'exec' command is different: it gives the opportunity to the user to examine or fix the failure, but does not stop saying "here's a commit to edit, use --continue when you're done". So, there's no reason to call the post-rewrite hook for 'exec' commands. If the user did rewrite the commit, it would be with 'git commit --amend' which already called the post-rewrite hook. Fix the behavior to leave no stopped-sha file in case of failed exec command, and teach 'git rebase --continue' to skip record_in_rewritten if no stopped-sha file is found. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-19Merge branch 'ph/rebase-i-redo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
"git rebase -i" moved the "current" command from "todo" to "done" a bit too prematurely, losing a step when a "pick" did not even start. * ph/rebase-i-redo: rebase -i: redo tasks that die during cherry-pick
2015-05-11Merge branch 'nd/multiple-work-trees'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
A replacement for contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir that does not rely on symbolic links and make sharing of objects and refs safer by making the borrowee and borrowers aware of each other. * nd/multiple-work-trees: (41 commits) prune --worktrees: fix expire vs worktree existence condition t1501: fix test with split index t2026: fix broken &&-chain t2026 needs procondition SANITY git-checkout.txt: a note about multiple checkout support for submodules checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees checkout: pass whole struct to parse_branchname_arg instead of individual flags git-common-dir: make "modules/" per-working-directory directory checkout: do not fail if target is an empty directory t2025: add a test to make sure grafts is working from a linked checkout checkout: don't require a work tree when checking out into a new one git_path(): keep "info/sparse-checkout" per work-tree count-objects: report unused files in $GIT_DIR/worktrees/... gc: support prune --worktrees gc: factor out gc.pruneexpire parsing code gc: style change -- no SP before closing parenthesis checkout: clean up half-prepared directories in --to mode checkout: reject if the branch is already checked out elsewhere prune: strategies for linked checkouts checkout: support checking out into a new working directory ...
2015-04-29rebase -i: redo tasks that die during cherry-pickLibravatar Phil Hord1-0/+16
When rebase--interactive processes a task, it removes the item from the todo list and appends it to another list of executed tasks. If a pick (this includes squash and fixup) fails before the index has recorded the changes, take the corresponding item and put it on the todo list again. Otherwise, the changes introduced by the scheduled commit would be lost. That kind of decision is possible since the cherry-pick command signals why it failed to apply the changes of the given commit. Either the changes are recorded in the index using a conflict (return value 1) and rebase does not continue until they are resolved or the changes are not recorded in the index (return value neither 0 nor 1) and rebase has to try again with the same task. Add a test cases for regression testing to the "rebase-interactive" test suite. Signed-off-by: Fabian Ruch <bafain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-23Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-count-todo' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
"git rebase -i" recently started to include the number of commits in the insn sheet to be processed, but on a platform that prepends leading whitespaces to "wc -l" output, the numbers are shown with extra whitespaces that aren't necessary. * es/rebase-i-count-todo: rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item count
2015-03-17Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-count-todo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
"git rebase -i" recently started to include the number of commits in the insn sheet to be processed, but on a platform that prepends leading whitespaces to "wc -l" output, the numbers are shown with extra whitespaces that aren't necessary. * es/rebase-i-count-todo: rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item count
2015-03-06rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" commentLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-1/+1
97f05f43 (Show number of TODO items for interactive rebase, 2014-12-10) taught rebase-interactive to display an item count in the instruction list comments: # Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 (4 TODO item(s)) # # Commands: # p, pick = use commit # ... However, with the exception of the --edit-todo option, "TODO" is a one-off term, never presented to the user by rebase-interactive in any other context. The item count is in fact the number of commands ("pick", "edit", etc.) remaining on the instruction sheet, and the comment immediately following it talks about "Commands". Consequently, replace "(# TODO item(s))" with the more accurate and meaningful "(# command(s))". Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-06rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item countLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-0/+1
97f05f43 (Show number of TODO items for interactive rebase, 2014-12-10) taught rebase-interactive to compute an item count with 'wc -l' and display it in the instruction list comments: # Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 (4 TODO item(s)) On Mac OS X, however, it renders as: # Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 ( 4 TODO item(s)) since 'wc -l' indents its output with leading spaces. Fix this. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-05Merge branch 'ks/rebase-i-abbrev' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+8
The insn sheet "git rebase -i" creates did not fully honor core.abbrev settings. * ks/rebase-i-abbrev: rebase -i: use full object name internally throughout the script
2015-02-17Merge branch 'ks/rebase-i-abbrev'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+8
The insn sheet "git rebase -i" creates did not fully honor core.abbrev settings. * ks/rebase-i-abbrev: rebase -i: use full object name internally throughout the script
2015-01-22rebase -i: use full object name internally throughout the scriptLibravatar Kirill A. Shutemov1-9/+8
In earlier days, the abbreviated commit object name shown to the end users were generated with hardcoded --abbrev=7; 56895038 (rebase -i: respect core.abbrev, 2013-09-28) tried to make it honor the user specified core.abbrev, but it missed the very initial invocation of the editor. These days, we try to use the full 40-hex object names internally to avoid ambiguity that can arise after rebase starts running. Newly created objects during the rebase may share the same prefix with existing commits listed in the insn sheet. These object names are shortened just before invoking the sequence editor to present the insn sheet to the end user, and then expanded back to full object names when the editor returns. But the code still used the shortened names when preparing the insn sheet for the very first time, resulting "7 hexdigits or more" output to the user. Change the code to use full 40-hex commit object names from the very beginning to make things more uniform. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-10Show number of TODO items for interactive rebaseLibravatar Onno Kortmann1-1/+3
During 'rebase -i', one wrong edit in a long rebase session might inadvertently drop commits/items. This change shows the total number of TODO items in the comments after the list. After performing the rebase edit, total item counts can be compared to make sure that no changes have been lost in the edit. Signed-off-by: Onno Kortmann <onno@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-01*.sh: avoid hardcoding $GIT_DIR/hooks/...Libravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-3/+3
If $GIT_COMMON_DIR is set, it should be $GIT_COMMON_DIR/hooks/, not $GIT_DIR/hooks/. Just let rev-parse --git-path handle it. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-pointLibravatar John Keeping1-1/+1
When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with changes in $upstream..$orig_head. Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode): git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \ $upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the following topology: C --- D --- E <- dev / B <- master@{1} / o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master where: - B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B; - C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict textually if applied in the wrong order; - E depends textually on D. The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C* and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is: o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D (or equivalently D*) results in a conflict. This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten. Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-06-25Merge branch 'ep/avoid-test-a-o'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Update tests and scripts to avoid "test ... -a ...", which is often more error-prone than "test ... && test ...". Squashed misconversion fix-up into git-submodule.sh updates. * ep/avoid-test-a-o: git-submodule.sh: avoid "echo" path-like values git-submodule.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/test-lib-functions.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t9814-git-p4-rename.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t5538-push-shallow.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t5403-post-checkout-hook.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t5000-tar-tree.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t4102-apply-rename.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t0026-eol-config.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/t0025-crlf-auto.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" t/lib-httpd.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" git-rebase--interactive.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" git-mergetool.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" git-bisect.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" contrib/examples/git-resolve.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" contrib/examples/git-repack.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" contrib/examples/git-merge.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" contrib/examples/git-commit.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" contrib/examples/git-clone.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>" check_bindir: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>"
2014-06-25Merge branch 'rr/rebase-autostash-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
The autostash mode of "git rebase -i" did not restore the dirty working tree state if the user aborted the interactive rebase by emptying the insn sheet. * rr/rebase-autostash-fix: rebase -i: test "Nothing to do" case with autostash rebase -i: handle "Nothing to do" case with autostash
2014-06-16Merge branch 'rr/rebase-autostash-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
* rr/rebase-autostash-fix: rebase -i: test "Nothing to do" case with autostash rebase -i: handle "Nothing to do" case with autostash
2014-06-09git-rebase--interactive.sh: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>"Libravatar Elia Pinto1-1/+1
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern shells, the reason to avoid "test <cond> && test <cond>" spawning one extra process by using a single "test <cond> -a <cond>" no longer exists. Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-19rebase -i: handle "Nothing to do" case with autostashLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-2/+2
When a user invokes $ git rebase -i @~3 with dirty files and rebase.autostash turned on, and exits the $EDITOR with an empty buffer, the autostash fails to apply. Although the primary focus of rr/rebase-autostash was to get the git-rebase--backend.sh scripts to return control to git-rebase.sh, it missed this case in git-rebase--interactive.sh. Since this case is unlike the other cases which return control for housekeeping, assign it a special return status and handle that return value explicitly in git-rebase.sh. Reported-by: Karen Etheridge <ether@cpan.org> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-21Merge branch 'km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+15
Work around /bin/sh that does not like "return" at the top-level of a file that is dot-sourced from inside a function definition. * km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase: Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD" rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
2014-04-17rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSDLibravatar Kyle J. McKay1-0/+15
Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4) the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that dot-sourced it. The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed. In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function, then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not itself inside a function), control will return from the function that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might follow the dot command inside that function. Commit 99855ddf (first appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command the last line in the function. Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the troublesome "return". The fix in 99855ddf does not address this problem. For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents: run_script2() { . "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh" _e=$? echo only this line should show [ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e return 3 } run_script2 e=$? [ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; } And script2.sh with these contents: if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh' after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell is simply the single line: only this line should show However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output appears instead: should not get here expected status 3 got 1 Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2 function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the "echo always shows" line did not run). These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in script2.sh. If script2.sh is changed to this: main() { if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : } main Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations. We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own function and then calling that as the last line in the script. Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-25Merge branch 'us/printf-not-echo'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* us/printf-not-echo: test-lib.sh: do not "echo" caller-supplied strings rebase -i: do not "echo" random user-supplied strings
2014-03-17rebase -i: do not "echo" random user-supplied stringsLibravatar Uwe Storbeck1-1/+1
In some places we "echo" a string that comes from a commit log message, which may have a backslash sequence that is interpreted by the command (POSIX.1 allows this), most notably "dash"'s built-in 'echo'. A commit message which contains the string '\n' (or ends with the string '\c') may result in a garbage line in the todo list of an interactive rebase which causes the rebase to fail. To reproduce the behavior (with dash as /bin/sh): mkdir test && cd test && git init echo 1 >foo && git add foo git commit -m"this commit message ends with '\n'" echo 2 >foo && git commit -a --fixup HEAD git rebase -i --autosquash --root Now the editor opens with garbage in line 3 which has to be removed or the rebase fails. Signed-off-by: Uwe Storbeck <uwe@ibr.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-11rebase: add the --gpg-sign optionLibravatar Nicolas Vigier1-13/+26
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-26remove #!interpreter line from shell librariesLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-6/+3
In a shell snippet meant to be sourced by other shell scripts, an opening #! line does more harm than good. The harm: - When the shell library is sourced, the interpreter and options from the #! line are not used. Specifying a particular shell can confuse the reader into thinking it is safe for the shell library to rely on idiosyncrasies of that shell. - Using #! instead of a plain comment drops a helpful visual clue that this is a shell library and not a self-contained script. - Tools such as lintian can use a #! line to tell when an installation script has failed by forgetting to set a script executable. This check does not work if shell libraries also start with a #! line. The good: - Text editors notice the #! line and use it for syntax highlighting if you try to edit the installed scripts (without ".sh" suffix) in place. The use of the #! for file type detection is not needed because Git's shell libraries are meant to be edited in source form (with ".sh" suffix). Replace the opening #! lines with comments. This involves tweaking the test harness's valgrind support to find shell libraries by looking for "# " in the first line instead of "#!" (see v1.7.6-rc3~7, 2011-06-17). Suggested by Russ Allbery through lintian. Thanks to Jeff King and Clemens Buchacher for further analysis. Tested by searching for non-executable scripts with #! line: find . -name .git -prune -o -type f -not -executable | while read file do read line <"$file" case $line in '#!'*) echo "$file" ;; esac done The only remaining scripts found are templates for shell scripts (unimplemented.sh, wrap-for-bin.sh) and sample input used in tests (t/t4034/perl/{pre,post}). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-30rebase -i: respect core.abbrevLibravatar Kirill A. Shutemov1-1/+1
collapse_todo_ids() uses `git rev-parse --short=7' to abbreviate commit ids before showing them to the user in a text editor. Let's drop argument from --short to the configured value instead (still defaulting to 7). Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-09-11Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-no-abbrev'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+30
The commit object names in the insn sheet that was prepared at the beginning of "rebase -i" session can become ambiguous as the rebasing progresses and the repository gains more commits. Make sure the internal record is kept with full 40-hex object names. * es/rebase-i-no-abbrev: rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collision t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision t3404: make tests more self-contained
2013-09-11Merge branch 'rt/rebase-p-no-merge-summary'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
"git rebase -p" internally used the merge machinery, but when rebasing, there should not be a need for merge summary. * rt/rebase-p-no-merge-summary: rebase --preserve-merges: ignore "merge.log" config
2013-09-11Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-respect-core-commentchar'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"rebase -i" forgot that the comment character can be configurable while reading its insn sheet. * es/rebase-i-respect-core-commentchar: rebase -i: fix cases ignoring core.commentchar
2013-08-25rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collisionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+30
The 'todo' sheet for interactive rebase shows abbreviated SHA-1's and then performs its operations upon those shortened values. This can lead to an abort if the SHA-1 of a reworded or edited commit is no longer unique within the abbreviated SHA-1 space and a subsequent SHA-1 in the todo list has the same abbreviated value. For example: edit f00dfad first pick badbeef second If, after editing, the new SHA-1 of "first" also has prefix badbeef, then the subsequent 'pick badbeef second' will fail since badbeef is no longer a unique SHA-1 abbreviation: error: short SHA1 badbeef is ambiguous. fatal: Needed a single revision Invalid commit name: badbeef Fix this problem by expanding the SHA-1's in the todo list before performing the operations. [es: also collapse & expand SHA-1's for --edit-todo; respect core.commentchar in transform_todo_ids(); compose commit message] Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-21rebase --preserve-merges: ignore "merge.log" configLibravatar Ralf Thielow1-1/+2
When "merge.log" config is set, "rebase --preserve-merges" will add the log lines to the message of the rebased merge commit. A rebase should not modify a commit message automatically. Teach "git-rebase" to ignore that configuration by passing "--no-log" to the git-merge call. Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-18rebase -i: fix cases ignoring core.commentcharLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-1/+1
180bad3d (rebase -i: respect core.commentchar, 2013-02-11) updated "rebase -i" to honor core.commentchar but missed one instance of hard-coded '#' comment character in skip_unnecessary_picks(). Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-18Merge branch 'rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
"git rebase [-i]" used to leave just "rebase" as its reflog message for some operations. This rewords them to be more informative. * rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword: rebase -i: use a better reflog message rebase: use a better reflog message
2013-07-11Merge branch 'af/rebase-i-merge-options'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+16
"git rebase -i" now honors --strategy and -X options. * af/rebase-i-merge-options: Do not ignore merge options in interactive rebase