summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-rebase--interactive.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2007-11-28scripts: do not get confused with HEAD in work treeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
When you have a file called HEAD in your work tree, many commands that our scripts feed "HEAD" to would complain about the rev vs path ambiguity. A solution is to form command line more carefully by appending -- to them, which makes it clear that we mean HEAD rev not HEAD file. This patch would apply to maint. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-08Avoid a few unportable, needlessly nested "...`...".Libravatar Ralf Wildenhues1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30git-rebase--interactive.sh: Make 3-way merge strategies work for -p.Libravatar Björn Steinbrink1-0/+2
git-rebase--interactive.sh used to pass all parents of a merge commit to git-merge, which means that we have at least 3 heads to merge: HEAD, first parent and second parent. So 3-way merge strategies like recursive wouldn't work. Fortunately, we have checked out the first parent right before the merge anyway, so that is HEAD. Therefore we can drop simply it from the list of parents, making 3-way strategies work for merge commits with only two parents. Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30git-rebase--interactive.sh: Don't pass a strategy to git-cherry-pick.Libravatar Björn Steinbrink1-2/+2
git-cherry-pick doesn't support a strategy paramter, so don't pass one. This means that --strategy for interactive rebases is a no-op for anything but merge commits, but that's still better than being broken. A correct fix would probably need to port the --merge behaviour from plain git-rebase.sh, but I have no clue how to integrate that cleanly. Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30Fix --strategy parsing in git-rebase--interactive.shLibravatar Björn Steinbrink1-1/+0
For the --strategy/-s option, git-rebase--interactive.sh dropped the parameter which it was trying to parse. Signed-off-by: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-15rebase -i: use diff plumbing instead of porcelainLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+2
When diff drivers are installed, calling "git diff <tree1>..<tree2>" calls those drivers. This borks the patch generation of rebase -i. So use "git diff-tree -p" instead, which does not call diff drivers. Noticed by Johannes Sixt. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-09-29rebase -i: squash should retain the authorship of the _first_ commitLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
It was determined on the mailing list, that it makes more sense for a "squash" to keep the author of the first commit as the author for the result of the squash. Make it so. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-23Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiomLibravatar David Kastrup1-1/+1
A lot of shell scripts contained stuff starting with while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac and similar. I consider breaking out of the condition instead of the body od the loop ugly, and the implied "true" value of the non-matching case is not really obvious to humans at first glance. It happens not to be obvious to some BSD shells, either, but that's because they are not POSIX-compliant. In most cases, this has been replaced by a straight condition using "test". "case" has the advantage of being faster than "test" on vintage shells where "test" is not a builtin. Since none of them is likely to run the git scripts, anyway, the added readability should be worth the change. A few loops have had their termination condition expressed differently. Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-01Avoid one-or-more (\+) non BRE in sed scripts.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-23rebase -i: fix squashing corner caseLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+3
When squashing, rebase -i did not prevent fast forwards. This could happen when picking some other commit than the first one, and then squashing the first commit. So do not allow fast forwards when squashing. Noticed by Johannes Sixt. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01rebase -i: fix for optional [branch] parameterLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
When calling "git rebase -i <upstream> <branch>", git should switch to <branch> first. This worked before, but I broke it by my "Shut git rebase -i up" patch. Fix that, and add a test to make sure that it does not break again. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Acked-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-01rebase -i: ignore patches that are already in the upstreamLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+3
Non-interactive rebase had this from the beginning -- match it by using --cherry-pick option to rev-list. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-28Rename git-rebase interactive buffer: todo => git-rebase-todoLibravatar Seth Falcon1-1/+1
When using emacsclient or similar, a temporary buffer (file) named 'todo' could cause confusion with a pre-existing buffer of the same name. Signed-off-by: Seth Falcon <sethfalcon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-27rebase -i: fix interrupted squashingLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
When a squashing merge failed, the first commit would not be replaced, due to "git reset --soft" being called with an unmerged index. Noticed by Uwe Kleine-König. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-25rebase -i: fix overzealous output redirectionLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+3
When squashing, you no longer saw what the editor had to say to you after commit 'Shut "git rebase -i" up when no --verbose was given' (if you used a console based editor, at least). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-23rebase -i: exchange all "if [ .. ]" by "if test .."Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-7/+7
This patch is literally :%s/if \[ *\(.*[^ ]\) *\]/if test \1/ in vi, after making sure that the other instances of "[..]" are not actually invocations of "test". Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-23Shut "git rebase -i" up when no --verbose was givenLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-16/+34
Up to now, git rebase -i was quite chatty, showing through all the nice core programs it called. Now it only shows a progress meter by default. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-21rebase -i: call editor just once for a multi-squashLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-10/+46
Sometimes you want to squash more than two commits. Before this patch, the editor was fired up for each squash command. Now the editor is started only with the last squash command. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-20Add GIT_EDITOR environment and core.editor configuration variablesLibravatar Adam Roben1-1/+1
These variables let you specify an editor that will be launched in preference to the EDITOR and VISUAL environment variables. The order of preference is GIT_EDITOR, core.editor, EDITOR, VISUAL. [jc: added a test and config variable documentation] Signed-off-by: Adam Roben <aroben@apple.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-13Fix git-rebase -i to allow squashing of fast-forwardable commitsLibravatar Alex Riesen1-2/+3
Without this change the commits will be left standalone, with duplicated commit message. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-08rebase -i: put a nice warning into the todo listLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+3
It seems that not everybody expects a difference between keeping a "pick" line, and deleting it. So be a bit more explicit about that, with all capitals to get the attention. Noticed by vmiklos on IRC. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-08rebase -i: remember the settings of -v, -s and -p when interruptedLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
After interruption, be that an edit, or a conflicting commit, reset the variables VERBOSE, STRATEGY and PRESERVE_MERGES, so that the user does not have to respecify them with "rebase --continue". Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-08rebase -i: actually show the diffstat when being verboseLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-4/+4
The "while" loop in the function do_rest is not supposed to ever be exited. Instead, the function do_one checks if there is nothing left, and cleans up and exits if that is the case. So the diffstat code belongs there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-08rebase -i: handle --continue more like non-interactive rebaseLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-9/+17
Non-interactive rebase requires the working tree to be clean, but applies what is in the index without requiring the user to do it herself. Imitate that, but (since we are interactive, after all) fire up an editor with the commit message. It also fixes a subtle bug: a forgotten "continue" was removed, which led to an infinite loop when continuing without remaining patches. Both issues noticed by Frank Lichtenheld. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-26Teach rebase -i about --preserve-mergesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-3/+107
The option "-p" (or long "--preserve-merges") makes it possible to rebase side branches including merges, without straightening the history. Example: X \ A---M---B / ---o---O---P---Q When the current HEAD is "B", "git rebase -i -p --onto Q O" will yield X \ ---o---O---P---Q---A'---M'---B' Note that this will - _not_ touch X [*1*], it does - _not_ work without the --interactive flag [*2*], it does - _not_ guess the type of the merge, but blindly uses recursive or whatever strategy you provided with "-s <strategy>" for all merges it has to redo, and it does - _not_ make use of the original merge commit via git-rerere. *1*: only commits which reach a merge base between <upstream> and HEAD are reapplied. The others are kept as-are. *2*: git-rebase without --interactive is inherently patch based (at least at the moment), and therefore merges cannot be preserved. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-26rebase -i: provide reasonable reflog for the rebased branchLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+8
If your rebase succeeded, the HEAD's reflog will still show the whole mess, but "<branchname>@{1}" now shows the state _before_ the rebase, so that you can reset (or compare) the original and the rebased revisions more easily. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-26rebase -i: several cleanupsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-4/+15
Support "--verbose" in addition to "-v", show short names in the list comment, clean up if there is nothing to do, and add several "test_ticks" in the test script. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-24Teach rebase an interactive modeLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+289
Don't you just hate the fact sometimes, that git-rebase just applies the patches, without any possibility to edit them, or rearrange them? With "--interactive", git-rebase now lets you edit the list of patches, so that you can reorder, edit and delete patches. Such a list will typically look like this: pick deadbee The oneline of this commit pick fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit ... By replacing the command "pick" with the command "edit", you can amend that patch and/or its commit message, and by replacing it with "squash" you can tell rebase to fold that patch into the patch before that. It is derived from the script sent to the list in <Pine.LNX.4.63.0702252156190.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>