summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-add--interactive.perl
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-06-25git-add--interactive.perl: Remove two unused variablesLibravatar Thomas Badie1-2/+0
The patch 8f0bef6 refactored this script and made the variable $fh unneeded in subs diff_applies and patch_update_file, but forgot to remove them. Signed-off-by: Thomas Badie <badie@lrde.epita.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-05add--interactive: ignore unmerged entries in patch modeLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+18
When "add -p" sees an unmerged entry, it shows the combined diff and then immediately skips the hunk. This can be confusing in a variety of ways, depending on whether there are other changes to stage (in which case you get the superfluous combined diff output in between other hunks) or not (in which case you get the combined diff and the program exits immediately, rather than seeing "No changes"). The current behavior was not planned, and is just what the implementation happens to do. Instead, let's explicitly remove unmerged entries from our list of modified files, and print a warning that we are ignoring them. We can cheaply find which entries are unmerged by adding "--raw" output to the "diff-files --numstat" we already run. There is one non-obvious thing we must change when parsing this combined output. Before this patch, when we saw a numstat line for a file that did not have index changes, we would create a new record with 'unchanged' in the 'INDEX' field. Because "--raw" comes before "--numstat", we must move this special-case down to the raw-line case (and it is sufficient to move it rather than handle it in both places, since any file which has a --numstat will also have a --raw entry). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-17add -i: ignore terminal escape sequencesLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+19
On the author's terminal, the up-arrow input sequence is ^[[A, and thus fat-fingering an up-arrow into 'git checkout -p' is quite dangerous: git-add--interactive.perl will ignore the ^[ and [ characters and happily treat A as "discard everything". As a band-aid fix, use Term::Cap to get all terminal capabilities. Then use the heuristic that any capability value that starts with ^[ (i.e., \e in perl) must be a key input sequence. Finally, given an input that starts with ^[, read more characters until we have read a full escape sequence, then return that to the caller. We use a timeout of 0.5 seconds on the subsequent reads to avoid getting stuck if the user actually input a lone ^[. Since none of the currently recognized keys start with ^[, the net result is that the sequence as a whole will be ignored and the help displayed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29"add -p": work-around an old laziness that does not coalesce hunksLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Since 0beee4c (git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02), "git add--interactive" behaves lazily and passes overlapping hunks to the underlying "git apply" without coalescing. This was partially corrected by 7a26e65 (its partial revert, 2009-05-16), but overlapping hunks are still passed when the patch is edited. Teach "git apply" the --allow-overlap option that disables a safety feature that avoids misapplication of patches by not applying patches to overlapping hunks, and pass this option form "add -p" codepath. Do not even advertise the option, as this is merely a workaround, and the correct fix is to make "add -p" correctly coalesce adjacent patch hunks. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29add--interactive.perl: factor out repeated --recount optionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+8
Depending on the direction and the target of patch application, we would need to pass --cached and --reverse to underlying "git apply". Also we only pass --check when we are not applying but just checking. But we always pass --recount since 8cbd431 (git-add--interactive: replace hunk recounting with apply --recount, 2008-07-02). Instead of repeating the same --recount over and over again, move it to a single place that actually runs the command, namely, "run_git_apply" subroutine. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29add -p: 'q' should really quitLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+4
The "quit" command was added in 9a7a1e0 (git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt, 2009-04-10) to allow the user to say that hunks other than what have already been chosen are undesirable, and exit the interactive loop immediately. It forgot that there may be an undecided hunk before the current one. In such a case, the interactive loop still goes back to the beginning. Clear all the USE bit for undecided hunks and exit the loop. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-29Merge branch 'jl/add-p-reverse-message'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
* jl/add-p-reverse-message: Correct help blurb in checkout -p and friends
2010-10-28Correct help blurb in checkout -p and friendsLibravatar Jonathan "Duke" Leto1-2/+11
When git checkout -p from the index or HEAD is run in edit mode, the help message about removing '-' and '+' lines was backwards. Because it is reverse applying the patch, the meanings of '-' and '+' are reversed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan "Duke" Leto <jonathan@leto.net> Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27perl: use "use warnings" instead of -wLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+2
Change the Perl scripts to turn on lexical warnings instead of setting the global $^W variable via the -w switch. The -w sets warnings for all code that interpreter runs, while "use warnings" is lexically scoped. The former is probably not what the authors wanted. As an auxiliary benefit it's now possible to build Git with: PERL_PATH='/usr/bin/env perl' Which would previously result in failures, since "#!/usr/bin/env perl -w" doesn't work as a shebang. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27perl: bump the required Perl version to 5.8 from 5.6.[21]Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+1
Formalize our dependency on perl 5.8, bumped from 5.6.[12]. We already used the three-arg form of open() which was introduced in 5.6.1, but t/t9700/test.pl explicitly depended on 5.6.2. However git-add--interactive.pl has been failing on the 5.6 line since it was introduced in v1.5.0-rc0~12^2~2 back in 2006 due to this open syntax: sub run_cmd_pipe { my $fh = undef; open($fh, '-|', @_) or die; return <$fh>; } Which when executed dies on "Can't use an undefined value as filehandle reference". Several of our tests also fail on 5.6 (even more when compiled with NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER=1): t2016-checkout-patch.sh t3904-stash-patch.sh t3701-add-interactive.sh t7105-reset-patch.sh t7501-commit.sh t9700-perl-git.sh Our code is bitrotting on 5.6 with no-one interested in fixing it, and pinning us to such an ancient release of Perl is keeping us from using useful features introduced in the 5.8 release. The 5.6 series is now over 10 years old, and the 5.6.2 maintenance release almost 7. 5.8 on the other hand is more than 8 years old. All the modern Unix-like operating systems have now upgraded to it or a later version, and 5.8 packages are available for old IRIX, AIX Solaris and Tru64 systems. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Acked-by: Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no> Acked-by: Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-13add-interactive: Clarify “remaining hunks in the file”Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+3
The "a" and "d" commands to ‘add --patch’ (accept/reject rest of file) interact with "j", "g", and "/" (skip some hunks) in a perhaps confusing way: after accepting or rejecting all _later_ hunks in the file, they return to the earlier, skipped hunks and prompt the user about them again. This behavior can be very useful in practice. One can still accept or reject _all_ undecided hunks in a file by using the "g" command to move to hunk #1 first. Reported-by: Frédéric Brière <fbriere@fbriere.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-07Merge branch 'jk/maint-add--interactive-delete'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+23
* jk/maint-add--interactive-delete: add-interactive: fix bogus diff header line ordering
2010-02-22add-interactive: fix bogus diff header line orderingLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+23
When we look at a patch for adding hunks interactively, we first split it into a header and a list of hunks. Some of the header lines, such as mode changes and deletion, however, become their own selectable hunks. Later when we reassemble the patch, we simply concatenate the header and the selected hunks. This leads to patches like this: diff --git a/file b/file index d95f3ad..0000000 --- a/file +++ /dev/null deleted file mode 100644 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -content Notice how the deletion comes _after_ the ---/+++ lines, when it should come before. In many cases, we can get away with this as git-apply accepts the slightly bogus input. However, in the specific case of a deletion line that is being applied via "apply -R", this malformed patch triggers an assert in git-apply. This comes up when discarding a deletion via "git checkout -p". Rather than try to make git-apply accept our odd input, let's just reassemble the patch in the correct order. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-08Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
* maint: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error case
2009-12-08Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-delete-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
* jk/maint-add-p-delete-fix: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files
2009-12-07add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty filesLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+5
Commit 24ab81a fixed the deletion of empty files, but broke deletion of non-empty files. The approach it took was to factor out the "deleted" line from the patch header into its own hunk, the same way we do for mode changes. However, unlike mode changes, we only showed the special "delete this file" hunk if there were no other hunks. Otherwise, the user would annoyingly be presented with _two_ hunks: one for deleting the file and one for deleting the content. This meant that in the non-empty case, we forgot about the deleted line entirely, and we submitted a bogus patch to git-apply (with "/dev/null" as the destination file, but not marked as a deletion). Instead, this patch combines the file deletion hunk and the content deletion hunk (if there is one) into a single deletion hunk which is either staged or not. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20Merge branch 'jn/editor-pager'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
* jn/editor-pager: Provide a build time default-pager setting Provide a build time default-editor setting am -i, git-svn: use "git var GIT_PAGER" add -i, send-email, svn, p4, etc: use "git var GIT_EDITOR" Teach git var about GIT_PAGER Teach git var about GIT_EDITOR Suppress warnings from "git var -l" Do not use VISUAL editor on dumb terminals Handle more shell metacharacters in editor names
2009-11-16Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-empty' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+13
* jk/maint-add-p-empty: add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files
2009-11-15Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-empty'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+13
* jk/maint-add-p-empty: add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files
2009-11-13add -i, send-email, svn, p4, etc: use "git var GIT_EDITOR"Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-2/+1
Use the new "git var GIT_EDITOR" feature to decide what editor to use, instead of duplicating its logic elsewhere. This should make the behavior of commands in edge cases (e.g., editor names with spaces) a little more consistent. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-27add-interactive: handle deletion of empty filesLibravatar Jeff King1-5/+13
Usually we show deletion as a big hunk deleting all of the file's text. However, for files with no content, the diff shows just the 'deleted file mode ...' line. This patch cause "add -p" (and related commands) to recognize that line and explicitly ask about deleting the file. We only add the "stage this deletion" hunk for empty files, since other files will already ask about the big content deletion hunk. We could also change those files to simply display "stage this deletion", but showing the actual deleted content is probably what an interactive user wants. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-23Merge branch 'pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude: git-add--interactive: never skip files included in index
2009-10-14Merge branch 'pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude: git-add--interactive: never skip files included in index
2009-10-10git-add--interactive: never skip files included in indexLibravatar Pauli Virtanen1-1/+1
Make "git add -p" to not skip files that are in index even if they are excluded (by .gitignore etc.). This fixes the contradictory behavior that "git status" and "git commit -a" listed such files as modified, but "git add -p FILENAME" ignored them. Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-07Merge branch 'tr/reset-checkout-patch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-31/+179
* tr/reset-checkout-patch: stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown options Make test case number unique tests: disable interactive hunk selection tests if perl is not available DWIM 'git stash save -p' for 'git stash -p' Implement 'git stash save --patch' Implement 'git checkout --patch' Implement 'git reset --patch' builtin-add: refactor the meat of interactive_add() Add a small patch-mode testing library git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode code Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'
2009-08-26Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix' into maint-1.6.3Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix: add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changes git add -p: demonstrate failure when staging both mode and hunk
2009-08-18Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix: add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changes git add -p: demonstrate failure when staging both mode and hunk
2009-08-15Implement 'git stash save --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+12
This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from the difference between HEAD and worktree, and git-stash will build a stash that reflects these changes. The index state of the stash is the same as your current index, and we also let --patch imply --keep-index. Note that because the selected hunks are rolled back from the worktree but not the index, the resulting state may appear somewhat confusing if you had also staged these changes. This is not entirely satisfactory, but due to the way stashes are applied, other solutions would require a change to the stash format. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15Implement 'git checkout --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+61
This introduces a --patch mode for git-checkout. In the index usage git checkout --patch -- [files...] it lets the user discard edits from the <files> at the granularity of hunks (by selecting hunks from 'git diff' and then reverse applying them to the worktree). We also accept a revision argument. In the case git checkout --patch HEAD -- [files...] we offer hunks from the difference between HEAD and the worktree, and reverse applies them to both index and worktree, allowing you to discard staged changes completely. In the non-HEAD usage git checkout --patch <revision> -- [files...] it offers hunks from the difference between the worktree and <revision>. The chosen hunks are then applied to both index and worktree. The application to worktree and index is done "atomically" in the sense that we first check if the patch applies to the index (it should always apply to the worktree). If it does not, we give the user a choice to either abort or apply to the worktree anyway. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15Implement 'git reset --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-4/+53
This introduces a --patch mode for git-reset. The basic case is git reset --patch -- [files...] which acts as the opposite of 'git add --patch -- [files...]': it offers hunks for *un*staging. Advanced usage is git reset --patch <revision> -- [files...] which offers hunks from the diff between the index and <revision> for forward application to the index. (That is, the basic case is just <revision> = HEAD.) Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changesLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+4
In 0392513 (add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling, 2009-04-16), we merged the interaction loops for mode changes and hunk staging. This was fine at the time, because 0beee4c (git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02) removed hunk coalescing. However, in 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16), we resurrected it. Since then, the code would attempt in vain to merge mode changes with diff hunks, corrupting both in the process. We add a check to the coalescing loop to ensure it only looks at diff hunks, thus skipping mode changes. Noticed-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-14git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode codeLibravatar Thomas Rast1-27/+55
This makes some aspects of the 'git add -p' loop configurable (within the code), so that we can later reuse git-add--interactive for other similar tools. Most fields are fairly straightforward, but APPLY gets a subroutine (instead of just a string a la 'apply --cached') so that we can handle 'checkout -p', which will need to atomically apply the patch twice (index and worktree). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-03add -i: do not dump patch during applicationLibravatar Thomas Rast1-1/+0
Remove a debugging print that snuck in at 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-16Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+95
This reverts commit 0beee4c6dec15292415e3d56075c16a76a22af54 but with a bit of twist, as we have added "edit hunk manually" hack and we cannot rely on the original line numbers of the hunks that were manually edited. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-20Merge branch 'mm/maint-add-p-quit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* mm/maint-add-p-quit: git add -p: add missing "q" to patch prompt
2009-04-20git add -p: add missing "q" to patch promptLibravatar Wincent Colaiuta1-1/+1
Commit cbd3a01 added a new "q" subcommand to the "git add -p" command loop, but forgot to add it to the prompt. Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-19add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handlingLibravatar Jeff King1-43/+21
The original implementation considered the mode separately from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages: 1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is that the main selection loop separates options with a comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes. 2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it, search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other hunks. To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type". Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function), nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can do that by staging or not staging). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-19git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+19
There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be more intuitive to allow 'quit' action. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-16add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handlingLibravatar Jeff King1-43/+21
The original implementation considered the mode separately from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages: 1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is that the main selection loop separates options with a comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes. 2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it, search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other hunks. To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type". Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function), nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can do that by staging or not staging). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-15git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt.Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+19
There's already 'd' to stop staging hunks in a file, but no explicit command to stop the interactive staging (for the current files and the remaining ones). Of course you can do 'd' and then ^C, but it would be more intuitive to allow 'quit' action. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-05Merge branch 'jc/add-p-unquote'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+52
* jc/add-p-unquote: git-add -i/-p: learn to unwrap C-quoted paths
2009-02-18git-add -i/-p: learn to unwrap C-quoted pathsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+52
The underlying plumbing commands are not run with -z option, so the paths returned from them need to be unquoted as needed. Remove the now stale BUGS section from git-add documentaiton as suggested by Teemu Likonen. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-11add -i: revisit hunk on editor failureLibravatar Deskin Miller1-0/+4
Similar to the behaviour for editing a commit message, let terminating the editor with a failure abort the current hunk edit and revisit the option selection for the hunk. Signed-off-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-08add -p: get rid of Git.pm warnings about unitialized valuesLibravatar Stephan Beyer1-1/+2
After invoking git add -p I always got the warnings: Use of uninitialized value $_[3] in exec at Git.pm line 1282. Use of uninitialized value $args[2] in join or string at Git.pm line 1264. A bisect showed that these warnings occur in a301973 "add -p: print errors in separate color" the first time. They can be reproduced by setting color.ui (or color.interactive) to "auto" and unsetting color.interactive.help and color.interactive.error. I am using Perl 5.10.0. The reason of the warning is that color.interactive.error defaults to color.interactive.help which defaults to nothing in the specific codepath. It defaults to 'red bold' some lines above which could lead to the wrong assumption that it always defaults to 'red bold' now. This patch lets it default to 'red bold', blowing the warnings away. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Acked-By: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-07add -p: import Term::ReadKey with 'require'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-1/+4
eval{use...} is no good because the 'use' is evaluated at compile time, so manually 'require' it. We need to forward declare the functions we use, otherwise Perl raises a compilation error. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-05add -p: print errors in separate colorLibravatar Thomas Rast1-10/+20
Print interaction error messages in color.interactive.error, which defaults to the value of color.interactive.help. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-05add -p: prompt for single charactersLibravatar Thomas Rast1-4/+41
Use Term::ReadKey, if available and enabled with interactive.singlekey, to let the user answer add -p's prompts by pressing a single key. We're not doing the same in the main 'add -i' interface because file selection etc. may expect several characters. Two commands take an argument: 'g' can easily cope since it'll just offer a choice of chunks. '/' now (unconditionally, even without readkey) offers a chance to enter a regex if none was given. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-04add -p: trap Ctrl-D in 'goto' modeLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+3
If the user hit Ctrl-D (EOF) while the script was in 'go to hunk?' mode, it threw an undefined variable error. Explicitly test for EOF and have it re-enter the goto prompt loop. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-04add -p: change prompt separator for 'g'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-1/+1
57886bc (git-add -i/-p: Change prompt separater from slash to comma, 2008-11-27) changed the prompt separator to ',', but forgot to adapt the 'g' (goto) command. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-01In add --patch, Handle K,k,J,j slightly more gracefully.Libravatar William Pursell1-15/+28
Instead of printing the help menu, this will print "No next hunk" and then process the given hunk again. Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>