summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-add--interactive.perl
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-06-16add--interactive: respect diff.compactionHeuristicLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+4
We use plumbing to generate the diff, so it doesn't automatically pick up UI config like compactionHeuristic. Let's forward it on, since interactive adding is porcelain. Note that we only need to handle the "true" case. There's no point in passing --no-compaction-heuristic when the variable is false, since nothing else could have turned it on. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-28add--interactive: allow custom diff highlighting programsLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+10
The patch hunk selector of add--interactive knows how ask git for colorized diffs, and correlate them with the uncolored diffs we apply. But there's not any way for somebody who uses a diff-filter tool like contrib's diff-highlight to see their normal highlighting. This patch lets users define an arbitrary shell command to pipe the colorized diff through. The exact output shouldn't matter (since we just show the result to humans) as long as it is line-compatible with the original diff (so that hunk-splitting can split the colorized version, too). I left two minor issues with the new system that I don't think are worth fixing right now, but could be done later: 1. We only filter colorized diffs. Theoretically a user could want to filter a non-colorized diff, but I find it unlikely in practice. Users who are doing things like diff-highlighting are likely to want color, too. 2. add--interactive will re-colorize a diff which has been hand-edited, but it won't have run through the filter. Fixing this is conceptually easy (just pipe the diff through the filter), but practically hard to do without using tempfiles (it would need to feed data to and read the result from the filter without deadlocking; this raises portability questions with respect to Windows). I've punted on both issues for now, and if somebody really cares later, they can do a patch on top. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-02-17Merge branch 'ak/add-i-empty-candidates'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
The interactive "show a list and let the user choose from it" interface "add -i" used showed and prompted to the user even when the candidate list was empty, against which the only "choice" the user could have made was to choose nothing. * ak/add-i-empty-candidates: add -i: return from list_and_choose if there is no candidate
2015-01-22add -i: return from list_and_choose if there is no candidateLibravatar Alexander Kuleshov1-0/+5
The list_and_choose() helper is given a prompt and a list, asks the user to make selection from the list, and then returns a list of items chosen. Even when it is given an empty list as the original candidate set to choose from, it gave a prompt to the user, who can only say "I am done choosing". Return an empty result when the input is an empty list without bothering the user. The existing caller must already have a logic to say "Nothing to do" or an equivalent when the returned list is empty (i.e. the user chose to select nothing) if it is necessary, so no change to the callers is necessary. This fixes the case where "add untracked" is asked in "git add -i" and there is no untracked files in the working tree. We used to give an empty list of files to choose from with a prompt, but with this change, we no longer do. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-15add--interactive: leave main loop on read errorLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+1
The main hunk loop for add--interactive will loop if it does not get a known input. This is a good thing if the user typed some invalid input. However, if we have an uncorrectable read error, we'll end up looping infinitely. We can fix this by noticing read errors (i.e., <STDIN> returns undef) and breaking out of the loop. One easy way to trigger this is if you have an editor that does not take over the terminal (e.g., one that spawns a window in an existing process and waits), start the editor with the hunk-edit command, and hit ^C to send SIGINT. The editor process dies due to SIGINT, but the perl add--interactive process does not (perl suspends SIGINT for the duration of our system() call). We return to the main loop, but further reads from stdin don't work. The SIGINT _also_ killed our parent git process, which orphans our process group, meaning that further reads from the terminal will always fail. We loop infinitely, getting EIO on each read. Note that there are several other spots where we read from stdin, too. However, in each of those cases, we do something sane when the read returns undef (breaking out of the loop, taking the input as "no", etc). They don't need similar treatment. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-08Merge branch 'jl/nor-or-nand-and'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Eradicate mistaken use of "nor" (that is, essentially "nor" used not in "neither A nor B" ;-)) from in-code comments, command output strings, and documentations. * jl/nor-or-nand-and: code and test: fix misuses of "nor" comments: fix misuses of "nor" contrib: fix misuses of "nor" Documentation: fix misuses of "nor"
2014-03-31code and test: fix misuses of "nor"Libravatar Justin Lebar1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Justin Lebar <jlebar@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-03git-add--interactive: warn if module for interactive.singlekey is missingLibravatar Simon Ruderich1-0/+3
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-25add-interactive: handle unborn branch in patch modeLibravatar Jeff King1-9/+13
The list_modified function already knows how to handle an unborn branch by diffing against the empty tree. However, the diff we perform to get the actual hunks does not. Let's use the same logic for both diffs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-04add--interactive: fix external command invocation on WindowsLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-1/+1
Back in 21e9757e (Hack git-add--interactive to make it work with ActiveState Perl, 2007-08-01), the invocation of external commands was changed to use qx{} on Windows. The rationale was that the command interpreter on Windows is not a POSIX shell, but rather Windows's CMD. That patch was wrong to include 'msys' in the check whether to use qx{} or not: 'msys' identifies MSYS perl as shipped with Git for Windows, which does not need the special treatment; qx{} should be used only with ActiveState perl, which is identified by 'MSWin32'. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-23add -i: add extra options at the right place in "diff" command lineLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Appending "--diff-algorithm=histogram" at the end of canned command line for various modes of "diff" is correct for most of them but not for "stash" that has a non-option already wired in, like so: 'stash' => { DIFF => 'diff-index -p HEAD', Appending an extra option after non-option may happen to work due to overly lax command line parser, but that is not something we should rely on. Instead, splice in the extra argument immediately after the command name (i.e. 'diff-index', 'diff-files', etc.). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-12add--interactive: respect diff.algorithmLibravatar John Keeping1-0/+5
When staging hunks interactively it is sometimes useful to use an alternative diff algorithm which splits the changes into hunks in a more logical manner. This is not possible because the plumbing commands called by add--interactive ignore the "diff.algorithm" configuration option (as they should). Since add--interactive is a porcelain command it should respect this configuration variable. To do this, make it read diff.algorithm and pass its value to the underlying diff-index and diff-files invocations. At this point, do not add options to "git add", "git reset" or "git checkout" (all of which can call git-add--interactive). If a user wants to override the value on the command line they can use: git -c diff.algorithm=$ALGO ... Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and testsLibravatar Stefano Lattarini1-1/+1
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-25git-add--interactive.perl: Remove two unused variablesLibravatar Thomas Badie1-2/+0
The patch 8f0bef6 refactored this script and made the variable $fh unneeded in subs diff_applies and patch_update_file, but forgot to remove them. Signed-off-by: Thomas Badie <badie@lrde.epita.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-05add--interactive: ignore unmerged entries in patch modeLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+18
When "add -p" sees an unmerged entry, it shows the combined diff and then immediately skips the hunk. This can be confusing in a variety of ways, depending on whether there are other changes to stage (in which case you get the superfluous combined diff output in between other hunks) or not (in which case you get the combined diff and the program exits immediately, rather than seeing "No changes"). The current behavior was not planned, and is just what the implementation happens to do. Instead, let's explicitly remove unmerged entries from our list of modified files, and print a warning that we are ignoring them. We can cheaply find which entries are unmerged by adding "--raw" output to the "diff-files --numstat" we already run. There is one non-obvious thing we must change when parsing this combined output. Before this patch, when we saw a numstat line for a file that did not have index changes, we would create a new record with 'unchanged' in the 'INDEX' field. Because "--raw" comes before "--numstat", we must move this special-case down to the raw-line case (and it is sufficient to move it rather than handle it in both places, since any file which has a --numstat will also have a --raw entry). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-17add -i: ignore terminal escape sequencesLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+19
On the author's terminal, the up-arrow input sequence is ^[[A, and thus fat-fingering an up-arrow into 'git checkout -p' is quite dangerous: git-add--interactive.perl will ignore the ^[ and [ characters and happily treat A as "discard everything". As a band-aid fix, use Term::Cap to get all terminal capabilities. Then use the heuristic that any capability value that starts with ^[ (i.e., \e in perl) must be a key input sequence. Finally, given an input that starts with ^[, read more characters until we have read a full escape sequence, then return that to the caller. We use a timeout of 0.5 seconds on the subsequent reads to avoid getting stuck if the user actually input a lone ^[. Since none of the currently recognized keys start with ^[, the net result is that the sequence as a whole will be ignored and the help displayed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29"add -p": work-around an old laziness that does not coalesce hunksLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Since 0beee4c (git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02), "git add--interactive" behaves lazily and passes overlapping hunks to the underlying "git apply" without coalescing. This was partially corrected by 7a26e65 (its partial revert, 2009-05-16), but overlapping hunks are still passed when the patch is edited. Teach "git apply" the --allow-overlap option that disables a safety feature that avoids misapplication of patches by not applying patches to overlapping hunks, and pass this option form "add -p" codepath. Do not even advertise the option, as this is merely a workaround, and the correct fix is to make "add -p" correctly coalesce adjacent patch hunks. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29add--interactive.perl: factor out repeated --recount optionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+8
Depending on the direction and the target of patch application, we would need to pass --cached and --reverse to underlying "git apply". Also we only pass --check when we are not applying but just checking. But we always pass --recount since 8cbd431 (git-add--interactive: replace hunk recounting with apply --recount, 2008-07-02). Instead of repeating the same --recount over and over again, move it to a single place that actually runs the command, namely, "run_git_apply" subroutine. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29add -p: 'q' should really quitLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+4
The "quit" command was added in 9a7a1e0 (git add -p: new "quit" command at the prompt, 2009-04-10) to allow the user to say that hunks other than what have already been chosen are undesirable, and exit the interactive loop immediately. It forgot that there may be an undecided hunk before the current one. In such a case, the interactive loop still goes back to the beginning. Clear all the USE bit for undecided hunks and exit the loop. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-29Merge branch 'jl/add-p-reverse-message'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
* jl/add-p-reverse-message: Correct help blurb in checkout -p and friends
2010-10-28Correct help blurb in checkout -p and friendsLibravatar Jonathan "Duke" Leto1-2/+11
When git checkout -p from the index or HEAD is run in edit mode, the help message about removing '-' and '+' lines was backwards. Because it is reverse applying the patch, the meanings of '-' and '+' are reversed. Signed-off-by: Jonathan "Duke" Leto <jonathan@leto.net> Acked-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27perl: use "use warnings" instead of -wLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+2
Change the Perl scripts to turn on lexical warnings instead of setting the global $^W variable via the -w switch. The -w sets warnings for all code that interpreter runs, while "use warnings" is lexically scoped. The former is probably not what the authors wanted. As an auxiliary benefit it's now possible to build Git with: PERL_PATH='/usr/bin/env perl' Which would previously result in failures, since "#!/usr/bin/env perl -w" doesn't work as a shebang. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27perl: bump the required Perl version to 5.8 from 5.6.[21]Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+1
Formalize our dependency on perl 5.8, bumped from 5.6.[12]. We already used the three-arg form of open() which was introduced in 5.6.1, but t/t9700/test.pl explicitly depended on 5.6.2. However git-add--interactive.pl has been failing on the 5.6 line since it was introduced in v1.5.0-rc0~12^2~2 back in 2006 due to this open syntax: sub run_cmd_pipe { my $fh = undef; open($fh, '-|', @_) or die; return <$fh>; } Which when executed dies on "Can't use an undefined value as filehandle reference". Several of our tests also fail on 5.6 (even more when compiled with NO_PERL_MAKEMAKER=1): t2016-checkout-patch.sh t3904-stash-patch.sh t3701-add-interactive.sh t7105-reset-patch.sh t7501-commit.sh t9700-perl-git.sh Our code is bitrotting on 5.6 with no-one interested in fixing it, and pinning us to such an ancient release of Perl is keeping us from using useful features introduced in the 5.8 release. The 5.6 series is now over 10 years old, and the 5.6.2 maintenance release almost 7. 5.8 on the other hand is more than 8 years old. All the modern Unix-like operating systems have now upgraded to it or a later version, and 5.8 packages are available for old IRIX, AIX Solaris and Tru64 systems. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Acked-by: Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no> Acked-by: Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn@stonehenge.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-13add-interactive: Clarify “remaining hunks in the file”Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+3
The "a" and "d" commands to ‘add --patch’ (accept/reject rest of file) interact with "j", "g", and "/" (skip some hunks) in a perhaps confusing way: after accepting or rejecting all _later_ hunks in the file, they return to the earlier, skipped hunks and prompt the user about them again. This behavior can be very useful in practice. One can still accept or reject _all_ undecided hunks in a file by using the "g" command to move to hunk #1 first. Reported-by: Frédéric Brière <fbriere@fbriere.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-07Merge branch 'jk/maint-add--interactive-delete'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+23
* jk/maint-add--interactive-delete: add-interactive: fix bogus diff header line ordering
2010-02-22add-interactive: fix bogus diff header line orderingLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+23
When we look at a patch for adding hunks interactively, we first split it into a header and a list of hunks. Some of the header lines, such as mode changes and deletion, however, become their own selectable hunks. Later when we reassemble the patch, we simply concatenate the header and the selected hunks. This leads to patches like this: diff --git a/file b/file index d95f3ad..0000000 --- a/file +++ /dev/null deleted file mode 100644 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -content Notice how the deletion comes _after_ the ---/+++ lines, when it should come before. In many cases, we can get away with this as git-apply accepts the slightly bogus input. However, in the specific case of a deletion line that is being applied via "apply -R", this malformed patch triggers an assert in git-apply. This comes up when discarding a deletion via "git checkout -p". Rather than try to make git-apply accept our odd input, let's just reassemble the patch in the correct order. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-08Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
* maint: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error case
2009-12-08Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-delete-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
* jk/maint-add-p-delete-fix: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files
2009-12-07add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty filesLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+5
Commit 24ab81a fixed the deletion of empty files, but broke deletion of non-empty files. The approach it took was to factor out the "deleted" line from the patch header into its own hunk, the same way we do for mode changes. However, unlike mode changes, we only showed the special "delete this file" hunk if there were no other hunks. Otherwise, the user would annoyingly be presented with _two_ hunks: one for deleting the file and one for deleting the content. This meant that in the non-empty case, we forgot about the deleted line entirely, and we submitted a bogus patch to git-apply (with "/dev/null" as the destination file, but not marked as a deletion). Instead, this patch combines the file deletion hunk and the content deletion hunk (if there is one) into a single deletion hunk which is either staged or not. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20Merge branch 'jn/editor-pager'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
* jn/editor-pager: Provide a build time default-pager setting Provide a build time default-editor setting am -i, git-svn: use "git var GIT_PAGER" add -i, send-email, svn, p4, etc: use "git var GIT_EDITOR" Teach git var about GIT_PAGER Teach git var about GIT_EDITOR Suppress warnings from "git var -l" Do not use VISUAL editor on dumb terminals Handle more shell metacharacters in editor names
2009-11-16Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-empty' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+13
* jk/maint-add-p-empty: add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files
2009-11-15Merge branch 'jk/maint-add-p-empty'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+13
* jk/maint-add-p-empty: add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files
2009-11-13add -i, send-email, svn, p4, etc: use "git var GIT_EDITOR"Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-2/+1
Use the new "git var GIT_EDITOR" feature to decide what editor to use, instead of duplicating its logic elsewhere. This should make the behavior of commands in edge cases (e.g., editor names with spaces) a little more consistent. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-27add-interactive: handle deletion of empty filesLibravatar Jeff King1-5/+13
Usually we show deletion as a big hunk deleting all of the file's text. However, for files with no content, the diff shows just the 'deleted file mode ...' line. This patch cause "add -p" (and related commands) to recognize that line and explicitly ask about deleting the file. We only add the "stage this deletion" hunk for empty files, since other files will already ask about the big content deletion hunk. We could also change those files to simply display "stage this deletion", but showing the actual deleted content is probably what an interactive user wants. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-23Merge branch 'pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude: git-add--interactive: never skip files included in index
2009-10-14Merge branch 'pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* pv/maint-add-p-no-exclude: git-add--interactive: never skip files included in index
2009-10-10git-add--interactive: never skip files included in indexLibravatar Pauli Virtanen1-1/+1
Make "git add -p" to not skip files that are in index even if they are excluded (by .gitignore etc.). This fixes the contradictory behavior that "git status" and "git commit -a" listed such files as modified, but "git add -p FILENAME" ignored them. Signed-off-by: Pauli Virtanen <pav@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-07Merge branch 'tr/reset-checkout-patch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-31/+179
* tr/reset-checkout-patch: stash: simplify defaulting to "save" and reject unknown options Make test case number unique tests: disable interactive hunk selection tests if perl is not available DWIM 'git stash save -p' for 'git stash -p' Implement 'git stash save --patch' Implement 'git checkout --patch' Implement 'git reset --patch' builtin-add: refactor the meat of interactive_add() Add a small patch-mode testing library git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode code Make 'git stash -k' a short form for 'git stash save --keep-index'
2009-08-26Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix' into maint-1.6.3Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix: add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changes git add -p: demonstrate failure when staging both mode and hunk
2009-08-18Merge branch 'tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* tr/maint-1.6.3-add-p-modeonly-fix: add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changes git add -p: demonstrate failure when staging both mode and hunk
2009-08-15Implement 'git stash save --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+12
This adds a hunk-based mode to git-stash. You can select hunks from the difference between HEAD and worktree, and git-stash will build a stash that reflects these changes. The index state of the stash is the same as your current index, and we also let --patch imply --keep-index. Note that because the selected hunks are rolled back from the worktree but not the index, the resulting state may appear somewhat confusing if you had also staged these changes. This is not entirely satisfactory, but due to the way stashes are applied, other solutions would require a change to the stash format. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15Implement 'git checkout --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+61
This introduces a --patch mode for git-checkout. In the index usage git checkout --patch -- [files...] it lets the user discard edits from the <files> at the granularity of hunks (by selecting hunks from 'git diff' and then reverse applying them to the worktree). We also accept a revision argument. In the case git checkout --patch HEAD -- [files...] we offer hunks from the difference between HEAD and the worktree, and reverse applies them to both index and worktree, allowing you to discard staged changes completely. In the non-HEAD usage git checkout --patch <revision> -- [files...] it offers hunks from the difference between the worktree and <revision>. The chosen hunks are then applied to both index and worktree. The application to worktree and index is done "atomically" in the sense that we first check if the patch applies to the index (it should always apply to the worktree). If it does not, we give the user a choice to either abort or apply to the worktree anyway. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15Implement 'git reset --patch'Libravatar Thomas Rast1-4/+53
This introduces a --patch mode for git-reset. The basic case is git reset --patch -- [files...] which acts as the opposite of 'git add --patch -- [files...]': it offers hunks for *un*staging. Advanced usage is git reset --patch <revision> -- [files...] which offers hunks from the diff between the index and <revision> for forward application to the index. (That is, the basic case is just <revision> = HEAD.) Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-15add -p: do not attempt to coalesce mode changesLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+4
In 0392513 (add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handling, 2009-04-16), we merged the interaction loops for mode changes and hunk staging. This was fine at the time, because 0beee4c (git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing, 2008-07-02) removed hunk coalescing. However, in 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16), we resurrected it. Since then, the code would attempt in vain to merge mode changes with diff hunks, corrupting both in the process. We add a check to the coalescing loop to ensure it only looks at diff hunks, thus skipping mode changes. Noticed-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-14git-apply--interactive: Refactor patch mode codeLibravatar Thomas Rast1-27/+55
This makes some aspects of the 'git add -p' loop configurable (within the code), so that we can later reuse git-add--interactive for other similar tools. Most fields are fairly straightforward, but APPLY gets a subroutine (instead of just a string a la 'apply --cached') so that we can handle 'checkout -p', which will need to atomically apply the patch twice (index and worktree). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-03add -i: do not dump patch during applicationLibravatar Thomas Rast1-1/+0
Remove a debugging print that snuck in at 7a26e65 (Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing", 2009-05-16). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-16Revert "git-add--interactive: remove hunk coalescing"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+95
This reverts commit 0beee4c6dec15292415e3d56075c16a76a22af54 but with a bit of twist, as we have added "edit hunk manually" hack and we cannot rely on the original line numbers of the hunks that were manually edited. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-20Merge branch 'mm/maint-add-p-quit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* mm/maint-add-p-quit: git add -p: add missing "q" to patch prompt
2009-04-20git add -p: add missing "q" to patch promptLibravatar Wincent Colaiuta1-1/+1
Commit cbd3a01 added a new "q" subcommand to the "git add -p" command loop, but forgot to add it to the prompt. Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-19add-interactive: refactor mode hunk handlingLibravatar Jeff King1-43/+21
The original implementation considered the mode separately from the rest of the hunks, asking about it outside the main hunk-selection loop. This patch instead places a mode change as the first hunk in the loop. This has two advantages: 1. less duplicated code (since we use the main selection loop). This also cleans up an inconsistency, which is that the main selection loop separates options with a comma, whereas the mode prompt used slashes. 2. users can now skip the mode change and come back to it, search for it (via "/mode"), etc, as they can with other hunks. To facilitate this, each hunk is now marked with a "type". Mode hunks are not considered for splitting (which would make no sense, and also confuses the split_hunk function), nor are they editable. In theory, one could edit the mode lines and change to a new mode. In practice, there are only two modes that git cares about (0644 and 0755), so either you want to move from one to the other or not (and you can do that by staging or not staging). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>