summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/date.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-16date API: add and use a date_mode_release()Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+5
Fix a memory leak in the parse_date_format() function by providing a new date_mode_release() companion function. By using this in "t/helper/test-date.c" we can mark the "t0006-date.sh" test as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak, and whitelist it to run under "GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" by adding "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to the test itself. The other tests that expose this memory leak (i.e. take the "mode->type == DATE_STRFTIME" branch in parse_date_format()) are "t6300-for-each-ref.sh" and "t7004-tag.sh". The former is due to an easily fixed leak in "ref-filter.c", and brings the failures in "t6300-for-each-ref.sh" down from 51 to 48. Fixing the remaining leaks will have to wait until there's a release_revisions() in "revision.c", as they have to do with leaks via "struct rev_info". There is also a leak in "builtin/blame.c" due to its call to parse_date_format() to parse the "blame.date" configuration. However as it declares a file-level "static struct date_mode blame_date_mode" to track the data, LSAN will not report it as a leak. It's possible to get valgrind(1) to complain about it with e.g.: valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ./git -P -c blame.date=format:%Y blame README.md But let's focus on things LSAN complains about, and are thus observable with "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true". We should get to fixing memory leaks in "builtin/blame.c", but as doing so would require some re-arrangement of cmd_blame() let's leave it for some other time. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-16date API: provide and use a DATE_MODE_INITLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-2/+1
Provide and use a DATE_MODE_INIT macro. Most of the users of struct date_mode" use it via pretty.h's "struct pretty_print_context" which doesn't have an initialization macro, so we're still bound to being initialized to "{ 0 }" by default. But we can change the couple of callers that directly declared a variable on the stack to instead use the initializer, and thus do away with the "mode.local = 0" added in add00ba2de9 (date: make "local" orthogonal to date format, 2015-09-03). Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-16date API: create a date.h, split from cache.hLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+1
Move the declaration of the date.c functions from cache.h, and adjust the relevant users to include the new date.h header. The show_ident_date() function belonged in pretty.h (it's defined in pretty.c), its two users outside of pretty.c didn't strictly need to include pretty.h, as they get it indirectly, but let's add it to them anyway. Similarly, the change to "builtin/{fast-import,show-branch,tag}.c" isn't needed as far as the compiler is concerned, but since they all use the "DATE_MODE()" macro we now define in date.h, let's have them include it. We could simply include this new header in "cache.h", but as this change shows these functions weren't common enough to warrant including in it in the first place. By moving them out of cache.h changes to this API will no longer cause a (mostly) full re-build of the project when "make" is run. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-11-04strbuf_addftime(): handle "%s" manuallyLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
The strftime() function has a non-standard "%s" extension, which prints the number of seconds since the epoch. But the "struct tm" we get has already been adjusted for a particular time zone; going back to an epoch time requires knowing that zone offset. Since strftime() doesn't take such an argument, round-tripping to a "struct tm" and back to the "%s" format may produce the wrong value (off by tz_offset seconds). Since we're already passing in the zone offset courtesy of c3fbf81a85 (strbuf: let strbuf_addftime handle %z and %Z itself, 2017-06-15), we can use that same value to adjust our epoch seconds accordingly. Note that the description above makes it sound like strftime()'s "%s" is useless (and really, the issue is shared by mktime(), which is what strftime() would use under the hood). But it gets the two cases for which it's designed correct: - the result of gmtime() will have a zero offset, so no adjustment is necessary - the result of localtime() will be offset by the local zone offset, and mktime() and strftime() are defined to assume this offset when converting back (there's actually some magic here; some implementations record this in the "struct tm", but we can't portably access or manipulate it. But they somehow "know" whether a "struct tm" is from gmtime() or localtime()). This latter point means that "format-local:%s" actually works correctly already, because in that case we rely on the system routines due to 6eced3ec5e (date: use localtime() for "-local" time formats, 2017-06-15). Our problem comes when trying to show times in the author's zone, as the system routines provide no mechanism for converting in non-local zones. So in those cases we have a "struct tm" that came from gmtime(), but has been manipulated according to our offset. The tests cover the broken round-trip by formatting "%s" for a time in a non-system timezone. We use the made-up "+1234" here, which has two advantages. One, we know it won't ever be the real system zone (and so we're actually testing a case that would break). And two, since it has a minute component, we're testing the full decoding of the +HHMM zone into a number of seconds. Likewise, we test the "-1234" variant to make sure there aren't any sign mistakes. There's one final test, which covers "format-local:%s". As noted, this already passes, but it's important to check that we didn't regress this case. In particular, the caller in show_date() is relying on localtime() to have done the zone adjustment, independent of any tz_offset we compute ourselves. These should match up, since our local_tzoffset() is likewise built around localtime(). But it would be easy for a caller to forget to pass in a correct tz_offset to strbuf_addftime(). Fortunately show_date() does this correctly (it has to because of the existing handling of %z), and the test continues to pass. So this one is just future-proofing against a change in our assumptions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-16comments: avoid using the gender of our usersLibravatar Felipe Contreras1-1/+1
We generally avoid specifying the gender of our users in order to be more inclusive, but sometimes a few slip by due to habit. Since by doing a little bit of rewording we can avoid this irrelevant detail, let's do so. Inspired-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-24date.c: allow compact version of ISO-8601 datetimeLibravatar Đoàn Trần Công Danh1-0/+14
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-24date.c: skip fractional second part of ISO-8601Libravatar Đoàn Trần Công Danh1-0/+12
git-commit(1) says ISO-8601 is one of our supported date format. ISO-8601 allows timestamps to have a fractional number of seconds. We represent time only in terms of whole seconds, so we never bothered parsing fractional seconds. However, it's better for us to parse and throw away the fractional part than to refuse to parse the timestamp at all. And refusing parsing fractional second part may confuse the parse to think fractional and timezone as day and month in this example: 2008-02-14 20:30:45.019-04:00 While doing this, make sure that we only interpret the number after the second and the dot as fractional when and only when the date is known, since only ISO-8601 allows the fractional part, and we've taught our users to interpret "12:34:56.7.days.ago" as a way to specify a time relative to current time. Reported-by: Brian M. Carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-24date.c: validate and set time in a helper functionLibravatar Đoàn Trần Công Danh1-4/+15
In a later patch, we will reuse this logic, move it to a helper, now. While we're at it, explicit states that we intentionally ignore old-and-defective 2nd leap second. Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-23date.c: s/is_date/set_date/Libravatar Đoàn Trần Công Danh1-11/+11
The function is_date, confusingly also set tm_year. tm_mon, and tm_mday after validating input. Rename to set_date to reflect its real usage. Also, change return value is 0 on success and -1 on failure following our convention on function do some real work. Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-30date.c: switch to reentrant {gm,local}time_rLibravatar Doan Tran Cong Danh1-8/+10
Originally, git was intended to be single-thread executable. `gmtime(3)' and `localtime(3)' can be used in such codebase for cleaner code. Overtime, we're employing multithread in our code base. Let's phase out `gmtime(3)' and `localtime(3)' in favour of `gmtime_r(3)' and `localtime_r(3)'. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-12Quit passing 'now' to date codeLibravatar Stephen P. Smith1-14/+13
Commit b841d4ff43 (Add `human` format to test-tool, 2019-01-28) added a get_time() function which allows $GIT_TEST_DATE_NOW in the environment to override the current time. So we no longer need to interpret that variable in cmd__date(). Therefore, we can stop passing the "now" parameter down through the date functions, since nobody uses them. Note that we do need to make sure all of the previous callers that took a "now" parameter are correctly using get_time(). Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith <ischis2@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-02-20completion: add more parameter value completionLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+4
This adds value completion for a couple more paramters. To make it easier to maintain these hard coded lists, add a comment at the original list/code to remind people to update git-completion.bash too. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-02-06Merge branch 'lt/date-human'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-22/+126
A new date format "--date=human" that morphs its output depending on how far the time is from the current time has been introduced. "--date=auto" can be used to use this new format when the output is going to the pager or to the terminal and otherwise the default format. * lt/date-human: Add `human` date format tests. Add `human` format to test-tool Add 'human' date format documentation Replace the proposed 'auto' mode with 'auto:' Add 'human' date format
2019-01-29Add `human` format to test-toolLibravatar Stephen P. Smith1-4/+17
Add the human format support to the test tool so that GIT_TEST_DATE_NOW can be used to specify the current time. The get_time() helper function was created and and checks the GIT_TEST_DATE_NOW environment variable. If GIT_TEST_DATE_NOW is set, then that date is used instead of the date returned by by gettimeofday(). All calls to gettimeofday() were replaced by calls to get_time(). Renamed occurances of TEST_DATE_NOW to GIT_TEST_DATE_NOW since the variable is now used in the get binary and not just in the test-tool. Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith <ischis2@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-24show_date_relative(): drop unused "tz" parameterLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+4
The timestamp we receive is in epoch time, so there's no need for a timezone parameter to interpret it. The matching show_date() uses "tz" to show dates in author local time, but relative dates show only the absolute time difference. The author's location is irrelevant, barring relativistic effects from using Git close to the speed of light. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-22Replace the proposed 'auto' mode with 'auto:'Libravatar Stephen P. Smith1-7/+8
In addition to adding the 'human' format, the patch added the auto keyword which could be used in the config file as an alternate way to specify the human format. Removing 'auto' cleans up the 'human' format interface. Added the ability to specify mode 'foo' if the pager is being used by using auto:foo syntax. Therefore, 'auto:human' date mode defaults to human if we're using the pager. So you can do git config --add log.date auto:human and your "git log" commands will show the human-legible format unless you're scripting things. Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith <ischis2@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-18Add 'human' date formatLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-20/+110
This adds --date=human, which skips the timezone if it matches the current time-zone, and doesn't print the whole date if that matches (ie skip printing year for dates that are "this year", but also skip the whole date itself if it's in the last few days and we can just say what weekday it was). For really recent dates (same day), use the relative date stamp, while for old dates (year doesn't match), don't bother with time and timezone. Also add 'auto' date mode, which defaults to human if we're using the pager. So you can do git config --add log.date auto and your "git log" commands will show the human-legible format unless you're scripting things. Note that this time format still shows the timezone for recent enough events (but not so recent that they show up as relative dates). You can combine it with the "-local" suffix to never show timezones for an even more simplified view. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Stephen P. Smith <ischis2@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-07approxidate: fix NULL dereference in date_time()Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we see a time like "noon", we pass "12" to our date_time() helper, which sets the hour to 12pm. If the current time is before noon, then we wrap around to yesterday using date_yesterday(). But unlike the normal calls to date_yesterday() from approxidate_alpha(), we pass a NULL "num" parameter. Since c27cc94fad (approxidate: handle pending number for "specials", 2018-11-02), that causes a segfault. One way to fix this is by checking for NULL. But arguably date_time() is abusing our helper by passing NULL in the first place (and this is the only case where one of these "special" parsers is used this way). So instead, let's have it just do the 1-day subtraction itself. It's still just a one-liner due to our update_tm() helper. Note that the test added here is a little funny, as we say "10am noon", which makes the "10am" seem pointless. But this bug can only be triggered when it the currently-parsed hour is before the special time. The latest special time is "tea" at 1700, but t0006 uses a hard-coded TEST_DATE_NOW of 1900. We could reset TEST_DATE_NOW, but that may lead to confusion in other tests. Just saying "10am noon" makes this test self-contained. Reported-by: Carlo Arenas <carenas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-02approxidate: handle pending number for "specials"Libravatar Jeff King1-27/+33
The approxidate parser has a table of special keywords like "yesterday", "noon", "pm", etc. Some of these, like "pm", do the right thing if we've recently seen a number: "3pm" is what you'd think. However, most of them do not look at or modify the pending-number flag at all, which means a number may "jump" across a significant keyword and be used unexpectedly. For example, when parsing: January 5th noon pm we'd connect the "5" to "pm", and ignore it as a day-of-month. This is obviously a bit silly, as "noon" already implies "pm". And other mis-parsed things are generally as silly ("January 5th noon, years ago" would connect the 5 to "years", but probably nobody would type that). However, the fix is simple: when we see a keyword like "noon", we should flush the pending number (as we would if we hit another number, or the end of the string). In a few of the specials that actually modify the day, we can simply throw away the number (saying "Jan 5 yesterday" should not respect the number at all). Note that we have to either move or forward-declare the static pending_number() to make it accessible to these functions; this patch moves it. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-06Replace all die("BUG: ...") calls by BUG() onesLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
In d8193743e08 (usage.c: add BUG() function, 2017-05-12), a new macro was introduced to use for reporting bugs instead of die(). It was then subsequently used to convert one single caller in 588a538ae55 (setup_git_env: convert die("BUG") to BUG(), 2017-05-12). The cover letter of the patch series containing this patch (cf 20170513032414.mfrwabt4hovujde2@sigill.intra.peff.net) is not terribly clear why only one call site was converted, or what the plan is for other, similar calls to die() to report bugs. Let's just convert all remaining ones in one fell swoop. This trick was performed by this invocation: sed -i 's/die("BUG: /BUG("/g' $(git grep -l 'die("BUG' \*.c) Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-07-06Merge branch 'ab/strbuf-addftime-tzname-boolify'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
strbuf_addftime() is further getting tweaked. * ab/strbuf-addftime-tzname-boolify: strbuf: change an always NULL/"" strbuf_addftime() param to bool strbuf.h comment: discuss strbuf_addftime() arguments in order
2017-07-01strbuf: change an always NULL/"" strbuf_addftime() param to boolLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
strbuf_addftime() allows callers to pass a time zone name for expanding %Z. The only current caller either passes the empty string or NULL, in which case %Z is handed over verbatim to strftime(3). Replace that string parameter with a flag controlling whether to remove %Z from the format specification. This simplifies the code. Commit-message-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-22Merge branch 'rs/strbuf-addftime-zZ'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+12
As there is no portable way to pass timezone information to strftime, some output format from "git log" and friends are impossible to produce. Teach our own strbuf_addftime to replace %z and %Z with caller-supplied values to help working around this. * rs/strbuf-addftime-zZ: date: use localtime() for "-local" time formats t0006: check --date=format zone offsets strbuf: let strbuf_addftime handle %z and %Z itself
2017-06-15date: use localtime() for "-local" time formatsLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+12
When we convert seconds-since-epochs timestamps into a broken-down "struct tm", we do so by adjusting the timestamp according to the known offset and then using gmtime() to break down the result. This means that the resulting struct "knows" that it's in GMT, even though the time it represents is adjusted for a different zone. The fields where it stores this data are not portably accessible, so we have no way to override them to tell them the real zone info. For the most part, this works. Our date-formatting routines don't pay attention to these inaccessible fields, and use the same tz info we provided for adjustment. The one exception is when we call strftime(), whose %Z format reveals this hidden timezone data. We solved that by always showing the empty string for %Z. This is allowed by POSIX, but not very helpful to the user. We can't make this work in the general case, as there's no portable function for setting an arbitrary timezone (and anyway, we don't have the zone name for the author zones, only their offsets). But for the special case of the "-local" formats, we can just skip the adjustment and use localtime() instead of gmtime(). This makes --date=format-local:%Z work correctly, showing the local timezone instead of an empty string. The new test checks the result for "UTC", our default test-lib value for $TZ. Using something like EST5 might be more interesting, but the actual zone string is system-dependent (for instance, on my system it expands to just EST). Hopefully "UTC" is vanilla enough that every system treats it the same. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-15strbuf: let strbuf_addftime handle %z and %Z itselfLibravatar René Scharfe1-1/+1
There is no portable way to pass timezone information to strftime. Add parameters for timezone offset and name to strbuf_addftime and let it handle the timezone-related format specifiers %z and %Z internally. Callers can opt out for %Z by passing NULL as timezone name. %z is always handled internally -- this helps on Windows, where strftime would expand it to a timezone name (same as %Z), in violation of POSIX. Modifiers are not handled, e.g. %Ez is still passed to strftime. Use an empty string as timezone name in show_date (the only current caller) for now because we only have the timezone offset in non-local mode. POSIX allows %Z to resolve to an empty string in case of missing information. Helped-by: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-27date.c: abort if the system time cannot handle one of our timestampsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+15
We are about to switch to a new data type for time stamps that is definitely not smaller or equal, but larger or equal to time_t. So before using the system functions to process or format timestamps, let's make extra certain that they can handle what we feed them. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-27timestamp_t: a new data type for timestampsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-33/+33
Git's source code assumes that unsigned long is at least as precise as time_t. Which is incorrect, and causes a lot of problems, in particular where unsigned long is only 32-bit (notably on Windows, even in 64-bit versions). So let's just use a more appropriate data type instead. In preparation for this, we introduce the new `timestamp_t` data type. By necessity, this is a very, very large patch, as it has to replace all timestamps' data type in one go. As we will use a data type that is not necessarily identical to `time_t`, we need to be very careful to use `time_t` whenever we interact with the system functions, and `timestamp_t` everywhere else. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-23PRItime: introduce a new "printf format" for timestampsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-13/+13
Currently, Git's source code treats all timestamps as if they were unsigned longs. Therefore, it is okay to write "%lu" when printing them. There is a substantial problem with that, though: at least on Windows, time_t is *larger* than unsigned long, and hence we will want to switch away from the ill-specified `unsigned long` data type. So let's introduce the pseudo format "PRItime" (currently simply being defined to "lu") to make it easier to change the data type used for timestamps. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-23parse_timestamp(): specify explicitly where we parse timestampsLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-3/+3
Currently, Git's source code represents all timestamps as `unsigned long`. In preparation for using a more appropriate data type, let's introduce a symbol `parse_timestamp` (currently being defined to `strtoul`) where appropriate, so that we can later easily switch to, say, use `strtoull()` instead. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-27date: add "unix" formatLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+8
We already have "--date=raw", which is a Unix epoch timestamp plus a contextual timezone (either the author's or the local). But one may not care about the timezone and just want the epoch timestamp by itself. It's not hard to parse the two apart, but if you are using a pretty-print format, you may want git to show the "finished" form that the user will see. We can accomodate this by adding a new date format, "unix", which is basically "raw" without the timezone. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-20local_tzoffset: detect errors from tm_to_time_tLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+2
When we want to know the local timezone offset at a given timestamp, we compute it by asking for localtime() at the given time, and comparing the offset to GMT at that time. However, there's some juggling between time_t and "struct tm" which happens, which involves calling our own tm_to_time_t(). If that function returns an error (e.g., because it only handles dates up to the year 2099), it returns "-1", which we treat as a time_t, and is clearly bogus, leading to bizarre timestamps (that seem to always adjust the time back to (time_t)(uint32_t)-1, in the year 2106). It's not a good idea for local_tzoffset() to simply die here; it would make it hard to run "git log" on a repository with funny timestamps. Instead, let's just treat such cases as "zero offset". Reported-by: Norbert Kiesel <nkiesel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-09-03date: make "local" orthogonal to date formatLibravatar Jeff King1-25/+45
Most of our "--date" modes are about the format of the date: which items we show and in what order. But "--date=local" is a bit of an oddball. It means "show the date in the normal format, but using the local timezone". The timezone we use is orthogonal to the actual format, and there is no reason we could not have "localized iso8601", etc. This patch adds a "local" boolean field to "struct date_mode", and drops the DATE_LOCAL element from the date_mode_type enum (it's now just DATE_NORMAL plus local=1). The new feature is accessible to users by adding "-local" to any date mode (e.g., "iso-local"), and we retain "local" as an alias for "default-local" for backwards compatibility. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-09-03date: check for "local" before anything elseLibravatar John Keeping1-3/+3
In a following commit we will make "local" orthogonal to the format. Although this will not apply to "relative", which does not use the timezone, it applies to all other formats so move the timezone conversion to the start of the function. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-29introduce "format" date-modeLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+8
This feeds the format directly to strftime. Besides being a little more flexible, the main advantage is that your system strftime may know more about your locale's preferred format (e.g., how to spell the days of the week). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-29convert "enum date_mode" into a structLibravatar Jeff King1-18/+25
In preparation for adding date modes that may carry extra information beyond the mode itself, this patch converts the date_mode enum into a struct. Most of the conversion is fairly straightforward; we pass the struct as a pointer and dereference the type field where necessary. Locations that declare a date_mode can use a "{}" constructor. However, the tricky case is where we use the enum labels as constants, like: show_date(t, tz, DATE_NORMAL); Ideally we could say: show_date(t, tz, &{ DATE_NORMAL }); but of course C does not allow that. Likewise, we cannot cast the constant to a struct, because we need to pass an actual address. Our options are basically: 1. Manually add a "struct date_mode d = { DATE_NORMAL }" definition to each caller, and pass "&d". This makes the callers uglier, because they sometimes do not even have their own scope (e.g., they are inside a switch statement). 2. Provide a pre-made global "date_normal" struct that can be passed by address. We'd also need "date_rfc2822", "date_iso8601", and so forth. But at least the ugliness is defined in one place. 3. Provide a wrapper that generates the correct struct on the fly. The big downside is that we end up pointing to a single global, which makes our wrapper non-reentrant. But show_date is already not reentrant, so it does not matter. This patch implements 3, along with a minor macro to keep the size of the callers sane. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-05Merge branch 'jc/epochtime-wo-tz'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+9
"git commit --date=now" or anything that relies on approxidate lost the daylight-saving-time offset. * jc/epochtime-wo-tz: parse_date_basic(): let the system handle DST conversion parse_date_basic(): return early when given a bogus timestamp
2015-04-15parse_date_basic(): let the system handle DST conversionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+6
The function parses the input to compute the broken-down time in "struct tm", and the GMT timezone offset. If the timezone offset does not exist in the input, the broken-down time is turned into the number of seconds since epoch both in the current timezone and in GMT and the offset is computed as their difference. However, we forgot to make sure tm.tm_isdst is set to -1 (i.e. let the system figure out if DST is in effect in the current timezone when turning the broken-down time to the number of seconds since epoch); it is done so at the beginning of the function, but a call to match_digit() in the function can lead to a call to gmtime_r() to clobber the field. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Diagnosed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-15parse_date_basic(): return early when given a bogus timestampLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
When the input does not have GMT timezone offset, the code computes it by computing the local and GMT time for the given timestamp. But there is no point doing so if the given timestamp is known to be a bogus one. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-07Merge branch 'jk/approxidate-avoid-y-d-m-over-future-dates'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+12
Traditionally we tried to avoid interpreting date strings given by the user as future dates, e.g. GIT_COMMITTER_DATE=2014-12-10 when used early November 2014 was taken as "October 12, 2014" because it is likely that a date in the future, December 10, is a mistake. Loosen this and do not tiebreak by future-ness of the date when (1) ISO-like format is used, and (2) the string can make sense interpreted as both y-m-d and y-d-m. * jk/approxidate-avoid-y-d-m-over-future-dates: approxidate: allow ISO-like dates far in the future pass TIME_DATE_NOW to approxidate future-check
2014-11-13approxidate: allow ISO-like dates far in the futureLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
When we are parsing approxidate strings and we find three numbers separate by one of ":/-.", we guess that it may be a date. We feed the numbers to match_multi_number, which checks whether it makes sense as a date in various orderings (e.g., dd/mm/yy or mm/dd/yy, etc). One of the checks we do is to see whether it is a date more than 10 days in the future. This was added in 38035cf (date parsing: be friendlier to our European friends., 2006-04-05), and lets us guess that if it is currently April 2014, then "10/03/2014" is probably March 10th, not October 3rd. This has a downside, though; if you want to be overly generous with your "--until" date specification, we may wrongly parse "2014-12-01" as "2014-01-12" (because the latter is an in-the-past date). If the year is a future year (i.e., both are future dates), it gets even weirder. Due to the vagaries of approxidate, months _after_ the current date (no matter the year) get flipped, but ones before do not. This patch drops the "in the future" check for dates of this form, letting us treat them always as yyyy-mm-dd, even if they are in the future. This does not affect the normal dd/mm/yyyy versus mm/dd/yyyy lookup, because this code path only kicks in when the first number is greater than 70 (i.e., it must be a year, and cannot be either a date or a month). The one possible casualty is that "yyyy-dd-mm" is less likely to be chosen over "yyyy-mm-dd". That's probably OK, though because: 1. The difference happens only when the date is in the future. Already we prefer yyyy-mm-dd for dates in the past. 2. It's unclear whether anybody even uses yyyy-dd-mm regularly. It does not appear in lists of common date formats in Wikipedia[1,2]. 3. Even if (2) is wrong, it is better to prefer ISO-like dates, as that is consistent with what we use elsewhere in git. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_representation_by_country [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-11-13pass TIME_DATE_NOW to approxidate future-checkLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+10
The approxidate functions accept an extra "now" parameter to avoid calling time() themselves. We use this in our test suite to make sure we have a consistent time for computing relative dates. However, deep in the bowels of approxidate, we also call time() to check whether possible dates are far in the future. Let's make sure that the "now" override makes it to that spot, too, so we can consistently test that feature. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-09-19Merge branch 'jk/commit-author-parsing'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+7
Code clean-up. * jk/commit-author-parsing: determine_author_info(): copy getenv output determine_author_info(): reuse parsing functions date: use strbufs in date-formatting functions record_author_date(): use find_commit_header() record_author_date(): fix memory leak on malformed commit commit: provide a function to find a header in a buffer
2014-08-29pretty: provide a strict ISO 8601 date formatLibravatar Beat Bolli1-1/+13
Git's "ISO" date format does not really conform to the ISO 8601 standard due to small differences, and it cannot be parsed by ISO 8601-only parsers, e.g. those of XML toolchains. The output from "--date=iso" deviates from ISO 8601 in these ways: - a space instead of the `T` date/time delimiter - a space between time and time zone - no colon between hours and minutes of the time zone Add a strict ISO 8601 date format for displaying committer and author dates. Use the '%aI' and '%cI' format specifiers and add '--date=iso-strict' or '--date=iso8601-strict' date format names. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/255879 and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/52414/focus=52585 for discussion. Signed-off-by: Beat Bolli <bbolli@ewanet.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-08-27date: use strbufs in date-formatting functionsLibravatar Jeff King1-6/+7
Many of the date functions write into fixed-size buffers. This is a minor pain, as we have to take special precautions, and frequently end up copying the result into a strbuf or heap-allocated buffer anyway (for which we sometimes use strcpy!). Let's instead teach parse_date, datestamp, etc to write to a strbuf. The obvious downside is that we might need to perform a heap allocation where we otherwise would not need to. However, it turns out that the only two new allocations required are: 1. In test-date.c, where we don't care about efficiency. 2. In determine_author_info, which is not performance critical (and where the use of a strbuf will help later refactoring). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-17i18n: fix uncatchable comments for translators in date.cLibravatar Jiang Xin1-1/+1
Comment for l10n translators can not be extracted by xgettext if it is not right above the l10n tag. Moving the comment right before the l10n tag will fix this issue. Reported-by: Brian Gesiak <modocache@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-14Merge branch 'jk/commit-dates-parsing-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+21
Tighten codepaths that parse timestamps in commit objects. * jk/commit-dates-parsing-fix: show_ident_date: fix tz range check log: do not segfault on gmtime errors log: handle integer overflow in timestamps date: check date overflow against time_t fsck: report integer overflow in author timestamps t4212: test bogus timestamps with git-log
2014-02-24log: do not segfault on gmtime errorsLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+4
Many code paths assume that show_date and show_ident_date cannot return NULL. For the most part, we handle missing or corrupt timestamps by showing the epoch time t=0. However, we might still return NULL if gmtime rejects the time_t we feed it, resulting in a segfault. Let's catch this case and just format t=0. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-24date: check date overflow against time_tLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+17
When we check whether a timestamp has overflowed, we check only against ULONG_MAX, meaning that strtoul has overflowed. However, we also feed these timestamps to system functions like gmtime, which expect a time_t. On many systems, time_t is actually smaller than "unsigned long" (e.g., because it is signed), and we would overflow when using these functions. We don't know the actual size or signedness of time_t, but we can easily check for truncation with a simple assignment. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-30Merge branch 'jk/date-c-double-semicolon'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* jk/date-c-double-semicolon: drop redundant semicolon in empty while
2013-10-24drop redundant semicolon in empty whileLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
The extra semi-colon is harmless, since we really do want the while loop to do nothing. But it does trigger a warning from clang. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>