summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/compat/nedmalloc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-10-05prefer memcpy to strcpyLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+3
When we already know the length of a string (e.g., because we just malloc'd to fit it), it's nicer to use memcpy than strcpy, as it makes it more obvious that we are not going to overflow the buffer (because the size we pass matches the size in the allocation). This also eliminates calls to strcpy, which make auditing the code base harder. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-11Windows: do not redefine _WIN32_WINNTLibravatar Sebastian Schuberth1-0/+2
With MinGW runtime version 4.0 this interferes with the previous definition from sdkddkver.h. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-22typofix: in-code commentsLibravatar Ondřej Bílka2-3/+3
Signed-off-by: Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-28compat/nedmalloc: Fix compiler warnings on linuxLibravatar Ramsay Jones1-0/+4
On linux, when the build variable USE_NED_ALLOCATOR is set, gcc issues the following warnings: In file included from compat/nedmalloc/nedmalloc.c:63: .../malloc.c.h: In function 'mmap_resize': .../malloc.c.h:3762: warning: implicit declaration of function 'mremap' .../malloc.c.h: In function 'sys_trim': .../malloc.c.h:4195: warning: comparison between pointer and integer The warnings are caused by the <sys/mman.h> header not enabling the (conditional) declaration of the mremap() function. The declaration can be enabled by defining the _GNU_SOURCE symbol prior to including certain system header files. In particular, it may not be sufficient to simply define _GNU_SOURCE just prior to including the <sys/mman.h> header. (e.g. defining the symbol after including <sys/types.h> will be completely ineffective.) In order to suppress the warnings, we define the _GNU_SOURCE symbol at the start of the malloc.c.h header file. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-28compat/nedmalloc: Fix some sparse warningsLibravatar Ramsay Jones2-3/+3
Sparse issues many "Using plain integer as NULL pointer" warnings while checking nedmalloc.c (at least 98 such warnings before giving up due to "too many warnings"). In addition, sparse issues some "non-ANSI function declaration" type warnings for the symbols 'win32_getcurrentthreadid', 'malloc_stats' and 'malloc_footprint'. In order to suppress the NULL pointer warnings, rather than replace all uses of '0' as a null pointer representation with NULL, we add -Wno-non-pointer-null to SPARSE_FLAGS while checking nedmalloc.c. In order to suppress the "non-ANSI function declaration" warnings, we simply include the missing 'empty parameter list' prototype (void) in the function declarations. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12compat/nedmalloc: fix spelling in commentsLibravatar Stefano Lattarini1-3/+3
Correct some typos found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-11nedmalloc: Fix a compile warning (exposed as error) with GCC 4.7.2Libravatar Sebastian Schuberth1-1/+4
On MinGW, GCC 4.7.2 complains about operation on 'p->m[end]' may be undefined Fix this by replacing the faulty lines with those of 69825ca from https://github.com/ned14/nedmalloc/blob/master/nedmalloc.c Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-22Documentation: Fix misspellingsLibravatar Leila Muhtasib1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Leila Muhtasib <muhtasib@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-13remove doubled words, e.g., s/to to/to/, and fix related typosLibravatar Jim Meyering1-6/+4
I found that some doubled words had snuck back into projects from which I'd already removed them, so now there's a "syntax-check" makefile rule in gnulib to help prevent recurrence. Running the command below spotted a few in git, too: git ls-files | xargs perl -0777 -n \ -e 'while (/\b(then?|[iao]n|i[fst]|but|f?or|at|and|[dt])\s+\1\b/gims)' \ -e '{$n=($` =~ tr/\n/\n/ + 1); ($v=$&)=~s/\n/\\n/g;' \ -e 'print "$ARGV:$n:$v\n"}' Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-22Typos in code comments, an error message, documentationLibravatar Ralf Wildenhues1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-11Fix typo in nedmalloc warning fixLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-08Fix warnings in nedmalloc when compiling with GCC 4.4.0Libravatar Johannes Schindelin2-2/+4
Nedmalloc's source code has a cute #define construct to avoid inserting an if() statement, because that might interact badly with enclosing if() statements. However, GCC > 4 complains with a "warning: value computed is not used". So we cast the result to "void". GCC also does not understand the Visual C++ specific pragmas, so we need to disable them for MinGW. We need to include malloc.h on Windows even if we happen to compile the stuff as a MinGW program. Otherwise the function declaration of alloca() is missing. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-01Add custom memory allocator to MinGW and MacOS buildsLibravatar Marius Storm-Olsen5-0/+7055
The standard allocator on Windows is pretty bad prior to Windows Vista, and nedmalloc is better than the modified dlmalloc provided with newer versions of the MinGW libc. NedMalloc stats in Git ---------------------- All results are the best result out of 3 runs. The benchmarks have been done on different hardware, so the repack times are not comparable. These benchmarks are all based on 'git repack -adf' on the Linux kernel. XP ----------------------------------------------- MinGW Threads Total Time Speed ----------------------------------------------- 3.4.2 (1T) 00:12:28.422 3.4.2 + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:25.437 1.68x 3.4.5 (1T) 00:12:20.718 3.4.5 + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:24.809 1.67x 4.3.3-tdm (1T) 00:12:01.843 4.3.3-tdm + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:16.468 1.65x 4.3.3-tdm (2T) 00:07:35.062 4.3.3-tdm + nedmalloc (2T) 00:04:57.874 1.54x Vista ----------------------------------------------- MinGW Threads Total Time Speed ----------------------------------------------- 4.3.3-tdm (1T) 00:07:40.844 4.3.3-tdm + nedmalloc (1T) 00:07:17.548 1.05x 4.3.3-tdm (2T) 00:05:33.746 4.3.3-tdm + nedmalloc (2T) 00:05:27.334 1.02x Mac Mini ----------------------------------------------- GCC Threads Total Time Speed ----------------------------------------------- i686-darwin9-4.0.1 (2T) 00:09:57.346 i686-darwin9-4.0.1+ned (2T) 00:08:51.072 1.12x Signed-off-by: Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>