summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/commit.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-12-05Merge branch 'jk/robustify-parse-commit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+8
* jk/robustify-parse-commit: checkout: do not die when leaving broken detached HEAD use parse_commit_or_die instead of custom message use parse_commit_or_die instead of segfaulting assume parse_commit checks for NULL commit assume parse_commit checks commit->object.parsed log_tree_diff: die when we fail to parse a commit
2013-10-24assume parse_commit checks for NULL commitLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
The parse_commit function will check whether it was passed a NULL commit pointer, and if so, return an error. There is no need for callers to check this separately. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-10-24log_tree_diff: die when we fail to parse a commitLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+7
We currently call parse_commit and then assume we can dereference the resulting "tree" struct field. If parsing failed, however, that field is NULL and we end up segfaulting. Instead of a segfault, let's print an error message and die a little more gracefully. Note that this should never happen in practice, but may happen in a corrupt repository. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-09Merge branch 'tr/log-full-diff-keep-true-parents'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+16
Output from "git log --full-diff -- <pathspec>" looked strange, because comparison was done with the previous ancestor that touched the specified <pathspec>, causing the patches for paths outside the pathspec to show more than the single commit has changed. Tweak "git reflog -p" for the same reason using the same mechanism. * tr/log-full-diff-keep-true-parents: log: use true parents for diff when walking reflogs log: use true parents for diff even when rewriting
2013-08-05Merge branch 'bc/commit-invalid-utf8'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* bc/commit-invalid-utf8: commit: typofix for xxFFF[EF] check
2013-08-05commit: typofix for xxFFF[EF] checkLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
We wanted to catch all codepoints that ends with FFFE and FFFF, not with 0FFFE and 0FFFF. Noticed and corrected by Peter Krefting. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-01log: use true parents for diff even when rewritingLibravatar Thomas Rast1-0/+16
When using pathspec filtering in combination with diff-based log output, parent simplification happens before the diff is computed. The diff is therefore against the *simplified* parents. This works okay, arguably by accident, in the normal case: simplification reduces to one parent as long as the commit is TREESAME to it. So the simplified parent of any given commit must have the same tree contents on the filtered paths as its true (unfiltered) parent. However, --full-diff breaks this guarantee, and indeed gives pretty spectacular results when comparing the output of git log --graph --stat ... git log --graph --full-diff --stat ... (--graph internally kicks in parent simplification, much like --parents). To fix it, store a copy of the parent list before simplification (in a slab) whenever --full-diff is in effect. Then use the stored parents instead of the simplified ones in the commit display code paths. The latter do not actually check for --full-diff to avoid duplicated code; they just grab the original parents if save_parents() has not been called for this revision walk. For ordinary commits it should be obvious that this is the right thing to do. Merge commits are a bit subtle. Observe that with default simplification, merge simplification is an all-or-nothing decision: either the merge is TREESAME to one parent and disappears, or it is different from all parents and the parent list remains intact. Redundant parents are not pruned, so the existing code also shows them as a merge. So if we do show a merge commit, the parent list just consists of the rewrite result on each parent. Running, e.g., --cc on this in --full-diff mode is not very useful: if any commits were skipped, some hunks will disagree with all sides of the merge (with one side, because commits were skipped; with the others, because they didn't have those changes in the first place). This triggers --cc showing these hunks spuriously. Therefore I believe that even for merge commits it is better to show the diffs wrt. the original parents. Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-18Merge branch 'bc/commit-invalid-utf8'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+32
Logic to auto-detect character encodings in the commit log message did not reject overlong and invalid UTF-8 characters. * bc/commit-invalid-utf8: commit: reject non-characters commit: reject overlong UTF-8 sequences commit: reject invalid UTF-8 codepoints
2013-07-09commit: reject non-charactersLibravatar Peter Krefting1-2/+5
Unicode clause D14 defines all characters U+nFFFE and U+nFFFF (where 0 <= n <= 10h) as well as the range U+FDD0..U+FDEF as non-characters, reserved for internal use only. Disallow these characters in commit messages as they are normally not recommended for interchange. Signed-off-by: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-04commit: reject overlong UTF-8 sequencesLibravatar brian m. carlson1-6/+12
The commit code accepts pseudo-UTF-8 sequences that encode a character with more bytes than necessary. Reject such sequences, since they are not valid UTF-8. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-04commit: reject invalid UTF-8 codepointsLibravatar brian m. carlson1-5/+22
The commit code already contains code for validating UTF-8, but it does not check for invalid values, such as guaranteed non-characters and surrogates. Fix this by explicitly checking for and rejecting such characters. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-02commit.c: make compare_commits_by_commit_date globalLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
This helper function was introduced as a prio_queue comparator to help topological sorting. However, other users of prio_queue who want to replace commit_list_insert_by_date will want to use it, too. So let's make it public. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-01Merge branch 'jc/topo-author-date-sort'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-27/+118
"git log" learned the "--author-date-order" option, with which the output is topologically sorted and commits in parallel histories are shown intermixed together based on the author timestamp. * jc/topo-author-date-sort: t6003: add --author-date-order test topology tests: teach a helper to set author dates as well t6003: add --date-order test topology tests: teach a helper to take abbreviated timestamps t/lib-t6000: style fixes log: --author-date-order sort-in-topological-order: use prio-queue prio-queue: priority queue of pointers to structs toposort: rename "lifo" field
2013-07-01Merge branch 'jk/commit-info-slab'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+28
Allow adding custom information to commit objects in order to represent unbound number of flag bits etc. * jk/commit-info-slab: commit-slab: introduce a macro to define a slab for new type commit-slab: avoid large realloc commit: allow associating auxiliary info on-demand
2013-06-11log: --author-date-orderLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+74
Sometimes people would want to view the commits in parallel histories in the order of author dates, not committer dates. Teach "topo-order" sort machinery to do so, using a commit-info slab to record the author dates of each commit, and prio-queue to sort them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-11sort-in-topological-order: use prio-queueLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-31/+44
Use the prio-queue data structure to implement a priority queue of commits sorted by committer date, when handling --date-order. The structure can also be used as a simple LIFO stack, which is a good match for --topo-order processing. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-11toposort: rename "lifo" fieldLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+8
The primary invariant of sort_in_topological_order() is that a parent commit is not emitted until all children of it are. When traversing a forked history like this with "git log C E": A----B----C \ D----E we ensure that A is emitted after all of B, C, D, and E are done, B has to wait until C is done, and D has to wait until E is done. In some applications, however, we would further want to control how these child commits B, C, D and E on two parallel ancestry chains are shown. Most of the time, we would want to see C and B emitted together, and then E and D, and finally A (i.e. the --topo-order output). The "lifo" parameter of the sort_in_topological_order() function is used to control this behaviour. We start the traversal by knowing two commits, C and E. While keeping in mind that we also need to inspect E later, we pick C first to inspect, and we notice and record that B needs to be inspected. By structuring the "work to be done" set as a LIFO stack, we ensure that B is inspected next, before other in-flight commits we had known that we will need to inspect, e.g. E. When showing in --date-order, we would want to see commits ordered by timestamps, i.e. show C, E, B and D in this order before showing A, possibly mixing commits from two parallel histories together. When "lifo" parameter is set to false, the function keeps the "work to be done" set sorted in the date order to realize this semantics. After inspecting C, we add B to the "work to be done" set, but the next commit we inspect from the set is E which is newer than B. The name "lifo", however, is too strongly tied to the way how the function implements its behaviour, and does not describe what the behaviour _means_. Replace this field with an enum rev_sort_order, with two possible values: REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER and REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE, and update the existing code. The mechanical replacement rule is: "lifo == 0" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE" "lifo == 1" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER" Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07commit-slab: introduce a macro to define a slab for new typeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-58/+14
Introduce a header file to define a macro that can define the struct type, initializer, accessor and cleanup functions to manage a commit slab. Update the "indegree" topological sort facility using it. To associate 32 flag bits with each commit, you can write: define_commit_slab(flag32, uint32); to declare "struct flag32" type, define an instance of it with struct flag32 flags; and initialize it by calling init_flag32(&flags); After that, a call to flag32_at() function uint32 *fp = flag32_at(&flags, commit); will return a pointer pointing at a uint32 for that commit. Once you are done with these flags, clean them up with clear_flag32(&flags); Callers that cannot hard-code how wide the data to be associated with the commit be at compile time can use the "_with_stride" variant to initialize the slab. Suppose you want to give one bit per existing ref, and paint commits down to find which refs are descendants of each commit. Saying typedef uint32 bits320[5]; define_commit_slab(flagbits, bits320); at compile time will still limit your code with hard-coded limit, because you may find that you have more than 320 refs at runtime. The code can declare a commit slab "struct flagbits" like this instead: define_commit_slab(flagbits, unsigned char); struct flagbits flags; and initialize it by: nrefs = ... count number of refs ... init_flagbits_with_stride(&flags, (nrefs + 7) / 8); so that unsigned char *fp = flagbits_at(&flags, commit); will return a pointer pointing at an array of 40 "unsigned char"s associated with the commit, once you figure out nrefs is 320 at runtime. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-13commit-slab: avoid large reallocLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-20/+42
Instead of using a single "slab" and keep reallocating it as we find that we need to deal with commits with larger values of commit->index, make a "slab" an array of many "slab_piece"s. Each access may need two levels of indirections, but we only need to reallocate the first level array of pointers when we have to grow the table this way. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-13commit: allow associating auxiliary info on-demandLibravatar Jeff King1-9/+50
The "indegree" field in the commit object is only used while sorting a list of commits in topological order, and wasting memory otherwise. We would prefer to shrink the size of individual commit objects, which we may have to hold thousands of in-core. We could eject "indegree" field out from the commit object and represent it as a dynamic table based on the decoration infrastructure, but the decoration is meant for sparse annotation and is not a good match. Instead, let's try a different approach. - Assign an integer (commit->index) to each commit we keep in-core (reuse the space of "indegree" field for it); - When running the topological sort, allocate an array of integers in bulk (called "slab"), use the commit->index as an index into this array, and store the "indegree" information there. This does _not_ reduce the memory footprint of a commit object, but the commit->index can be used as the index to dynamically associate commits with other kinds of information as needed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12Sync with 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and tests kwset: fix spelling in comments precompose-utf8: fix spelling of "want" in error message compat/nedmalloc: fix spelling in comments compat/regex: fix spelling and grammar in comments obstack: fix spelling of similar contrib/subtree: fix spelling of accidentally git-remote-mediawiki: spelling fixes doc: various spelling fixes fast-export: fix argument name in error messages Documentation: distinguish between ref and offset deltas in pack-format i18n: make the translation of -u advice in one go
2013-04-12Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and testsLibravatar Stefano Lattarini1-1/+1
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-31merge/pull Check for untrusted good GPG signaturesLibravatar Sebastian Götte1-5/+9
When --verify-signatures is specified, abort the merge in case a good GPG signature from an untrusted key is encountered. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-31commit.c/GPG signature verification: Also look at the first GPG status lineLibravatar Sebastian Götte1-5/+12
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-31Move commit GPG signature verification to commit.cLibravatar Sebastian Götte1-0/+59
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-05commit.c: use clear_commit_marks_many() in in_merge_bases_many()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-05commit.c: add in_merge_bases_many()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+18
Similar to in_merge_bases(commit, other) that returns true when commit is an ancestor (i.e. in the merge bases between the two) of the other commit, in_merge_bases_many(commit, n_other, other[]) checks if commit is an ancestor of any of the other[] commits. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-05commit.c: add clear_commit_marks_many()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+13
clear_commit_marks(struct commit *, unsigned) only can clear flag bits starting from a single commit; introduce an API to allow feeding an array of commits, so that flag bits can be cleared from commits reachable from any of them with a single traversal. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-29Move print_commit_list to libgit.aLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+10
This is used by bisect.c, part of libgit.a while it stays in builtin/rev-list.c. Move it to commit.c so that we won't get undefined reference if a program that uses libgit.a happens to pull it in. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2012-10-08Merge branch 'jc/merge-bases-paint-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
"git fmt-merge-msg" (an internal helper reduce_heads() it uses) had a severe performance regression; an empty "git pull" took forever to finish as the result. * jc/merge-bases-paint-fix: paint_down_to_common(): parse commit before relying on its timestamp
2012-10-04paint_down_to_common(): parse commit before relying on its timestampLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
When refactoring the merge-base computation to reduce the pairwise O(n*(n-1)) traversals to parallel O(n) traversals, the code forgot that timestamp based heuristics needs each commit to have been parsed. This caused an empty "git pull" to spend cycles, traversing the history all the way down to 0 (because an unparsed commit object has 0 timestamp, and any other commit object with positive timestamp will be processed for its parents, all getting parsed), only to come up with a merge message to be used. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-15commit.c: mark a file-scope private symbol as staticLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+5
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-11Merge branch 'jc/merge-bases'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-91/+120
Optimise the "merge-base" computation a bit, and also update its users that do not need the full merge-base information to call a cheaper subset. * jc/merge-bases: reduce_heads(): reimplement on top of remove_redundant() merge-base: "--is-ancestor A B" get_merge_bases_many(): walk from many tips in parallel in_merge_bases(): use paint_down_to_common() merge_bases_many(): split out the logic to paint history in_merge_bases(): omit unnecessary redundant common ancestor reduction http-push: use in_merge_bases() for fast-forward check receive-pack: use in_merge_bases() for fast-forward check in_merge_bases(): support only one "other" commit
2012-09-07Merge branch 'lt/commit-tree-guess-utf-8'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+86
Teach "git commit" and "git commit-tree" the "we are told to use utf-8 in log message, but this does not look like utf-8---attempt to pass it through convert-from-latin1-to-utf8 and see if it makes sense" heuristics "git mailinfo" already uses. * lt/commit-tree-guess-utf-8: commit/commit-tree: correct latin1 to utf-8
2012-08-31reduce_heads(): reimplement on top of remove_redundant()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-38/+18
This is used by "git merge" and "git merge-base --independent" but used to use a similar N*(N-1) traversals to reject commits that are ancestors of other commits. Reimplement it on top of remove_redundant(). Note that the callers of this function are allowed to pass the same commit more than once, but remove_redundant() is designed to be fed each commit only once. The function removes duplicates before calling remove_redundant(). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-30get_merge_bases_many(): walk from many tips in parallelLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-21/+58
The get_merge_bases_many() function reduces the result returned by the merge_bases_many() function, which is a set of possible merge bases, by excluding commits that can be reached from other commits. We used to do N*(N-1) traversals for this, but we can check if one commit reaches which other (N-1) commits by a single traversal, and repeat it for all the candidates to find the answer. Introduce remove_redundant() helper function to do this painting; we should be able to use it to reimplement reduce_heads() as well. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-30in_merge_bases(): use paint_down_to_common()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-10/+7
With paint_down_to_common(), we can tell if "commit" is reachable from "reference" by simply looking at its object flag, instead of iterating over the merge bases. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-30merge_bases_many(): split out the logic to paint historyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-19/+28
Introduce a new helper function paint_down_to_common() that takes the same parameters as merge_bases_many(), but without the first optimization of not painting anything when "one" is one of the "twos" (or vice versa), and the last clean-up of removing the common ancestor that is known to be an ancestor of another common one. This way, the caller of the new function could tell if "one" is reachable from any of the "twos" by simply looking at the flag bits of "one". If (and only if) it is painted in PARENT2, it is reachable from one of the "twos". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-28in_merge_bases(): omit unnecessary redundant common ancestor reductionLibravatar Thomas Rast1-1/+4
The function get_merge_bases() needs to postprocess the result from merge_bases_many() in order to make sure none of the commit is a true ancestor of another commit, which is expensive. However, when checking if a commit is an ancestor of another commit, we only need to see if the commit is a common ancestor between the two, and do not have to care if other common ancestors merge_bases_many() finds are true merge bases or an ancestor of another merge base. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27in_merge_bases(): support only one "other" commitLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+9
In early days of its life, I planned to make it possible to compute "is a commit contained in all of these other commits?" with this function, but it turned out that no caller needed it. Just make it take two commit objects and add a comment to say what these two functions do. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-21commit/commit-tree: correct latin1 to utf-8Libravatar Linus Torvalds1-2/+86
When a line in the message is not a valid utf-8, "git mailinfo" attempts to convert it to utf-8 assuming the input is latin1 (and punt if it does not convert cleanly). Using the same heuristics in "git commit" and "git commit-tree" lets the editor output be in latin1 to make the overall system more consistent. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-22Merge branch 'jc/sha1-name-more'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Teaches the object name parser things like a "git describe" output is always a commit object, "A" in "git log A" must be a committish, and "A" and "B" in "git log A...B" both must be committish, etc., to prolong the lifetime of abbreviated object names. * jc/sha1-name-more: (27 commits) t1512: match the "other" object names t1512: ignore whitespaces in wc -l output rev-parse --disambiguate=<prefix> rev-parse: A and B in "rev-parse A..B" refer to committish reset: the command takes committish commit-tree: the command wants a tree and commits apply: --build-fake-ancestor expects blobs sha1_name.c: add support for disambiguating other types revision.c: the "log" family, except for "show", takes committish revision.c: allow handle_revision_arg() to take other flags sha1_name.c: introduce get_sha1_committish() sha1_name.c: teach lookup context to get_sha1_with_context() sha1_name.c: many short names can only be committish sha1_name.c: get_sha1_1() takes lookup flags sha1_name.c: get_describe_name() by definition groks only commits sha1_name.c: teach get_short_sha1() a commit-only option sha1_name.c: allow get_short_sha1() to take other flags get_sha1(): fix error status regression sha1_name.c: restructure disambiguation of short names sha1_name.c: correct misnamed "canonical" and "res" ...
2012-07-09sha1_name.c: introduce get_sha1_committish()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Many callers know that the user meant to name a committish by syntactical positions where the object name appears. Calling this function allows the machinery to disambiguate shorter-than-unique abbreviated object names between committish and others. Note that this does NOT error out when the named object is not a committish. It is merely to give a hint to the disambiguation machinery. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-24ident: rename IDENT_ERROR_ON_NO_NAME to IDENT_STRICTLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
Callers who ask for ERROR_ON_NO_NAME are not so much concerned that the name will be blank (because, after all, we will fall back to using the username), but rather it is a check to make sure that low-quality identities do not end up in things like commit messages or emails (whereas it is OK for them to end up in things like reflogs). When future commits add more quality checks on the identity, each of these callers would want to use those checks, too. Rather than modify each of them later to add a new flag, let's refactor the flag. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-25commit: remove commit_list_reverse()Libravatar René Scharfe1-15/+0
The function commit_list_reverse() is not used anymore; delete it. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-25sequencer: export commit_list_append()Libravatar René Scharfe1-0/+27
This function can be used in other parts of git. Give it a new home in commit.c. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-23Merge branch 'rs/commit-list-sort-in-batch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+38
Setting up a revision traversal with many starting points was inefficient as these were placed in a date-order priority queue one-by-one. By René Scharfe (3) and Junio C Hamano (1) * rs/commit-list-sort-in-batch: mergesort: rename it to llist_mergesort() revision: insert unsorted, then sort in prepare_revision_walk() commit: use mergesort() in commit_list_sort_by_date() add mergesort() for linked lists
2012-04-17mergesort: rename it to llist_mergesort()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Even though the function is generic enough, <anything>sort() inherits connotations from the standard function qsort() that sorts an array. Rename it to llist_mergesort() and describe the external interface in its header file. This incidentally avoids name clashes with mergesort() some platforms declare in, and contaminate user namespace with, their <stdlib.h>. Reported-by: Brian Gernhardt Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-11revision: insert unsorted, then sort in prepare_revision_walk()Libravatar René Scharfe1-0/+15
Speed up prepare_revision_walk() by adding commits without sorting to the commit_list and at the end sort the list in one go. Thanks to mergesort() working behind the scenes, this is a lot faster for large numbers of commits than the current insert sort. Also introduce and use commit_list_reverse(), to keep the ordering of commits sharing the same commit date unchanged. That's because commit_list_insert_by_date() sorts commits with descending date, but adds later entries with the same date entries last, while commit_list_insert() always inserts entries at the top. The following commit_list_sort_by_date() keeps the order of entries sharing the same date. Jeff's test case, in a repo with lots of refs, was to run: # make a new commit on top of HEAD, but not yet referenced sha1=`git commit-tree HEAD^{tree} -p HEAD </dev/null` # now do the same "connected" test that receive-pack would do git rev-list --objects $sha1 --not --all With a git.git with a ref for each revision, master needs (best of five): real 0m2.210s user 0m2.188s sys 0m0.016s And with this patch: real 0m0.480s user 0m0.456s sys 0m0.020s Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-11commit: use mergesort() in commit_list_sort_by_date()Libravatar René Scharfe1-6/+23
Replace the insertion sort in commit_list_sort_by_date() with a call to the generic mergesort function. This sets the stage for using commit_list_sort_by_date() for larger lists, as shown in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>