summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/commit-graph.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-09-20Merge branch 'js/run-command-close-packs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
The run-command API has been updated so that the callers can easily ask the file descriptors open for packfiles to be closed immediately before spawning commands that may trigger auto-gc. * js/run-command-close-packs: Close object store closer to spawning child processes run_auto_maintenance(): implicitly close the object store run-command: offer to close the object store before running run-command: prettify the `RUN_COMMAND_*` flags pull: release packs before fetching commit-graph: when closing the graph, also release the slab
2021-09-20Merge branch 'ab/progress-users-adjust-counters'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The code to show progress indicator in a few code paths did not cover between 0-100%, which has been corrected. * ab/progress-users-adjust-counters: entry: show finer-grained counter in "Filtering content" progress line commit-graph: fix bogus counter in "Scanning merged commits" progress line
2021-09-09commit-graph: fix bogus counter in "Scanning merged commits" progress lineLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
The final value of the counter of the "Scanning merged commits" progress line is always one less than its expected total, e.g.: Scanning merged commits: 83% (5/6), done. This happens because while iterating over an array the loop variable is passed to display_progress() as-is, but while C arrays (and thus the loop variable) start at 0 and end at N-1, the progress counter must end at N. Fix this by passing 'i + 1' to display_progress(), like most other callsites do. There's an RFC series to add a GIT_TEST_CHECK_PROGRESS=1 mode[1] which catches this issue in the 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' and 'fetch.writeCommitGraph with submodules' tests in 't5510-fetch.sh'. The GIT_TEST_CHECK_PROGRESS=1 mode is not part of this series, but future changes to progress.c may add it or similar assertions to catch this and similar bugs elsewhere. 1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210620200303.2328957-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-08commit-graph: when closing the graph, also release the slabLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+1
The slab has information about the commit graph. That means that it is meaningless (and even misleading) when the commit graph was closed. This seems not to matter currently, but we're about to fix a Windows-specific bug where `git pull` does not close the object store before fetching (risking that an implicit auto-gc fails to remove the now-obsolete pack file(s)), and once we have that bug fix in place, it does matter: after that bug fix, we will open the object store, do some stuff with it, then close it, fetch, and then open it again, and do more stuff. If we close the commit graph without releasing the corresponding slab, we're hit by a symptom like this in t5520.19: BUG: commit-reach.c:85: bad generation skip 9223372036854775807 > 3 at 5cd378271655d43a3b4477520014f02213ad1546 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-08-09revision: avoid hitting packfiles when commits are in commit-graphLibravatar Patrick Steinhardt1-0/+24
When queueing references in git-rev-list(1), we try to optimize parsing of commits via the commit-graph. To do so, we first look up the object's type, and if it is a commit we call `repo_parse_commit()` instead of `parse_object()`. This is quite inefficient though given that we're always uncompressing the object header in order to determine the type. Instead, we can opportunistically search the commit-graph for the object ID: in case it's found, we know it's a commit and can directly fill in the commit object without having to uncompress the object header. Expose a new function `lookup_commit_in_graph()`, which tries to find a commit in the commit-graph by ID, and convert `get_reference()` to use this function. This provides a big performance win in cases where we load references in a repository with lots of references pointing to commits. The following has been executed in a real-world repository with about 2.2 million refs: Benchmark #1: HEAD~: rev-list --unsorted-input --objects --quiet --not --all --not $newrev Time (mean ± σ): 4.458 s ± 0.044 s [User: 4.115 s, System: 0.342 s] Range (min … max): 4.409 s … 4.534 s 10 runs Benchmark #2: HEAD: rev-list --unsorted-input --objects --quiet --not --all --not $newrev Time (mean ± σ): 3.089 s ± 0.015 s [User: 2.768 s, System: 0.321 s] Range (min … max): 3.061 s … 3.105 s 10 runs Summary 'HEAD: rev-list --unsorted-input --objects --quiet --not --all --not $newrev' ran 1.44 ± 0.02 times faster than 'HEAD~: rev-list --unsorted-input --objects --quiet --not --all --not $newrev' Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-08-09commit-graph: split out function to search commit positionLibravatar Patrick Steinhardt1-25/+30
The function `find_commit_in_graph()` assumes that the caller has passed an object which was already determined to be a commit given that it will access the commit's graph position, which is stored in a commit slab. In a subsequent patch, we want to search for an object ID though without knowing whether it is a commit or not, which is not currently possible. Split out the logic to search the commit graph for a given object ID to prepare for this change. This commit also renames the function to `find_commit_pos_in_graph()`, which more accurately reflects what this function does. Furthermore, in order to allow for the searched object ID to be const, we need to adjust `bsearch_graph()`'s signature to accept a constant object ID as input, too. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-28Merge branch 'ab/attribute-format'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
Many "printf"-like helper functions we have have been annotated with __attribute__() to catch placeholder/parameter mismatches. * ab/attribute-format: advice.h: add missing __attribute__((format)) & fix usage *.h: add a few missing __attribute__((format)) *.c static functions: add missing __attribute__((format)) sequencer.c: move static function to avoid forward decl *.c static functions: don't forward-declare __attribute__
2021-07-13*.c static functions: add missing __attribute__((format))Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+1
Add missing __attribute__((format)) function attributes to various "static" functions that take printf arguments. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-28commit-graph: rewrite to use checksum_valid()Libravatar Taylor Blau1-8/+6
Rewrite an existing caller in `git commit-graph verify` to take advantage of checksum_valid(). Note that the replacement isn't a verbatim cut-and-paste, since the new function avoids using hashfile at all and instead talks to the_hash_algo directly, but it is functionally equivalent. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-27commit-graph: don't store file hashes as struct object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-6/+7
The idea behind struct object_id is that it is supposed to represent the identifier of a standard Git object or a special pseudo-object like the all-zeros object ID. In this case, we have file hashes, which, while similar, are distinct from the identifiers of objects. Switch these code paths to use an unsigned char array. This is both more logically consistent and it means that we need not set the algorithm identifier for the struct object_id. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-27Always use oidread to read into struct object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-6/+6
In the future, we'll want oidread to automatically set the hash algorithm member for an object ID we read into it, so ensure we use oidread instead of hashcpy everywhere we're copying a hash value into a struct object_id. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-22Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-generation-config'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+20
A new configuration variable has been introduced to allow choosing which version of the generation number gets used in the commit-graph file. * ds/commit-graph-generation-config: commit-graph: use config to specify generation type commit-graph: create local repository pointer
2021-03-13use CALLOC_ARRAYLibravatar René Scharfe1-2/+2
Add and apply a semantic patch for converting code that open-codes CALLOC_ARRAY to use it instead. It shortens the code and infers the element size automatically. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-01Merge branch 'ds/chunked-file-api'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-200/+112
The common code to deal with "chunked file format" that is shared by the multi-pack-index and commit-graph files have been factored out, to help codepaths for both filetypes to become more robust. * ds/chunked-file-api: commit-graph.c: display correct number of chunks when writing chunk-format: add technical docs chunk-format: restore duplicate chunk checks midx: use 64-bit multiplication for chunk sizes midx: use chunk-format read API commit-graph: use chunk-format read API chunk-format: create read chunk API midx: use chunk-format API in write_midx_internal() midx: drop chunk progress during write midx: return success/failure in chunk write methods midx: add num_large_offsets to write_midx_context midx: add pack_perm to write_midx_context midx: add entries to write_midx_context midx: use context in write_midx_pack_names() midx: rename pack_info to write_midx_context commit-graph: use chunk-format write API chunk-format: create chunk format write API commit-graph: anonymize data in chunk_write_fn
2021-03-01Merge branch 'js/commit-graph-warning'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+3
* js/commit-graph-warning: Revert "commit-graph: when incompatible with graphs, indicate why"
2021-03-01Revert "commit-graph: when incompatible with graphs, indicate why"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+3
This reverts commit c85eec7fc37e1ca79072f263ae6ea1ee305ba38c, as it is a bit overzealous, we are in prerelease freeze, and we want to have enough time to get this right and cook in 'next'. cf. <8735xgkvuo.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
2021-02-25commit-graph: use config to specify generation typeLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-7/+15
We have two established generation number versions: 1: topological levels 2: corrected commit dates The corrected commit dates are enabled by default, but they also write extra data in the GDAT and GDOV chunks. Services that host Git data might want to have more control over when this feature rolls out than just updating the Git binaries. Add a new "commitGraph.generationVersion" config option that specifies the intended generation number version. If this value is less than 2, then the GDAT chunk is never written _or read_ from an existing file. This can replace our use of the GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT environment variable in the test suite. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-25commit-graph: create local repository pointerLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-4/+5
The write_commit_graph() method uses 'the_repository' in a few places. A new need for a repository pointer is coming in the following change, so group these instances into a local variable 'r' that could eventually become part of the method signature, if so desired. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-24commit-graph.c: display correct number of chunks when writingLibravatar Taylor Blau1-4/+3
When writing a commit-graph, a progress meter is shown which indicates the number of pieces of data to write (one per commit in each chunk). In 47410aa837 (commit-graph: use chunk-format write API, 2021-02-18), the number of chunks became tracked by the new chunk-format API. But a stray local variable was left behind from when write_commit_graph_file() used to keep track of the same. Since this was no longer updated after 47410aa837, the progress meter appeared broken: $ git commit-graph write --reachable Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 837569, done. Writing out commit graph in 3 passes: 166% (4187845/2512707), done. Drop the local variable and rely instead on the chunk-format API to tell us the correct number of chunks. Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-22commit-graph: avoid leaking topo_levels slab in write_commit_graph()Libravatar Andrzej Hunt1-0/+1
write_commit_graph initialises topo_levels using init_topo_level_slab(), next it calls compute_topological_levels() which can cause the slab to grow, we therefore need to clear the slab again using clear_topo_level_slab() when we're done. First introduced in 72a2bfca (commit-graph: add a slab to store topological levels, 2021-01-16). LeakSanitizer output: ==1026==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 8 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x498ae9 in realloc /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:164:3 #1 0xafbed8 in xrealloc /src/git/wrapper.c:126:8 #2 0x7966d1 in topo_level_slab_at_peek /src/git/commit-graph.c:71:1 #3 0x7965e0 in topo_level_slab_at /src/git/commit-graph.c:71:1 #4 0x78fbf5 in compute_topological_levels /src/git/commit-graph.c:1472:12 #5 0x78c5c3 in write_commit_graph /src/git/commit-graph.c:2456:2 #6 0x535c5f in graph_write /src/git/builtin/commit-graph.c:299:6 #7 0x5350ca in cmd_commit_graph /src/git/builtin/commit-graph.c:337:11 #8 0x4cddb1 in run_builtin /src/git/git.c:453:11 #9 0x4cabe2 in handle_builtin /src/git/git.c:704:3 #10 0x4cd084 in run_argv /src/git/git.c:771:4 #11 0x4ca424 in cmd_main /src/git/git.c:902:19 #12 0x707fb6 in main /src/git/common-main.c:52:11 #13 0x7fee4249383f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2083f) Indirect leak of 524256 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x498942 in calloc /src/llvm-project/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154:3 #1 0xafc088 in xcalloc /src/git/wrapper.c:140:8 #2 0x796870 in topo_level_slab_at_peek /src/git/commit-graph.c:71:1 #3 0x7965e0 in topo_level_slab_at /src/git/commit-graph.c:71:1 #4 0x78fbf5 in compute_topological_levels /src/git/commit-graph.c:1472:12 #5 0x78c5c3 in write_commit_graph /src/git/commit-graph.c:2456:2 #6 0x535c5f in graph_write /src/git/builtin/commit-graph.c:299:6 #7 0x5350ca in cmd_commit_graph /src/git/builtin/commit-graph.c:337:11 #8 0x4cddb1 in run_builtin /src/git/git.c:453:11 #9 0x4cabe2 in handle_builtin /src/git/git.c:704:3 #10 0x4cd084 in run_argv /src/git/git.c:771:4 #11 0x4ca424 in cmd_main /src/git/git.c:902:19 #12 0x707fb6 in main /src/git/common-main.c:52:11 #13 0x7fee4249383f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x2083f) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 524264 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-18commit-graph: use chunk-format read APILibravatar Derrick Stolee1-105/+54
Instead of parsing the table of contents directly, use the chunk-format API methods read_table_of_contents() and pair_chunk(). While the current implementation loses the duplicate-chunk detection, that will be added in a future change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-18commit-graph: use chunk-format write APILibravatar Derrick Stolee1-82/+37
The commit-graph write logic is ready to make use of the chunk-format write API. Each chunk write method is already in the correct prototype. We only need to use the 'struct chunkfile' pointer and the correct API calls. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-17Merge branch 'js/commit-graph-warning'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+11
When certain features (e.g. grafts) used in the repository are incompatible with the use of the commit-graph, we used to silently turned commit-graph off; we now tell the user what we are doing. * js/commit-graph-warning: commit-graph: when incompatible with graphs, indicate why
2021-02-17Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-genno-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-37/+101
Fix incremental update of commit-graph file around corrected commit date data. * ds/commit-graph-genno-fix: commit-graph: prepare commit graph commit-graph: be extra careful about mixed generations commit-graph: compute generations separately commit-graph: validate layers for generation data commit-graph: always parse before commit_graph_data_at() commit-graph: use repo_parse_commit
2021-02-17Merge branch 'ak/corrected-commit-date'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-47/+204
The commit-graph learned to use corrected commit dates instead of the generation number to help topological revision traversal. * ak/corrected-commit-date: doc: add corrected commit date info commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common() commit-graph: use generation v2 only if entire chain does commit-graph: implement generation data chunk commit-graph: implement corrected commit date commit-graph: return 64-bit generation number commit-graph: add a slab to store topological levels t6600-test-reach: generalize *_three_modes commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_info revision: parse parent in indegree_walk_step() commit-graph: fix regression when computing Bloom filters
2021-02-11commit-graph: when incompatible with graphs, indicate whyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-3/+11
When `gc.writeCommitGraph = true`, it is possible that the commit-graph is _still_ not written: replace objects, grafts and shallow repositories are incompatible with the commit-graph feature. Under such circumstances, we need to indicate to the user why the commit-graph was not written instead of staying silent about it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-10Merge branch 'jk/use-oid-pos'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-15/+15
Code clean-up to ensure our use of hashtables using object names as keys use the "struct object_id" objects, not the raw hash values. * jk/use-oid-pos: oid_pos(): access table through const pointers hash_pos(): convert to oid_pos() rerere: use strmap to store rerere directories rerere: tighten rr-cache dirname check rerere: check dirname format while iterating rr_cache directory commit_graft_pos(): take an oid instead of a bare hash
2021-02-05commit-graph: anonymize data in chunk_write_fnLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-10/+19
In preparation for creating an API around file formats using chunks and tables of contents, prepare the commit-graph write code to use prototypes that will match this new API. Specifically, convert chunk_write_fn to take a "void *data" parameter instead of the commit-graph-specific "struct write_commit_graph_context" pointer. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-03Merge branch 'jk/peel-iterated-oid'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The peel_ref() API has been replaced with peel_iterated_oid(). * jk/peel-iterated-oid: refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()
2021-02-01commit-graph: prepare commit graphLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-8/+2
Before checking if the repository has a commit-graph loaded, be sure to run prepare_commit_graph(). This is necessary because otherwise the topo_levels slab is not initialized. As we compute topo_levels for the new commits, we iterate further into the lower layers since the first visit to each commit looks as though the topo_level is not populated. By properly initializing the topo_slab, we fix the previously broken case of a split commit graph where a base layer has the generation_data_overflow chunk. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-01commit-graph: be extra careful about mixed generationsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-2/+12
When upgrading to a commit-graph with corrected commit dates from one without, there are a few things that need to be considered. When computing generation numbers for the new commit-graph file that expects to add the generation_data chunk with corrected commit dates, we need to ensure that the 'generation' member of the commit_graph_data struct is set to zero for these commits. Unfortunately, the fallback to use topological level for generation number when corrected commit dates are not available are causing us harm here: parsing commits notices that read_generation_data is false and populates 'generation' with the topological level. The solution is to iterate through the commits, parse the commits to populate initial values, then reset the generation values to zero to trigger recalculation. This loop only occurs when the existing commit-graph data has no corrected commit dates. While this improves our situation somewhat, we have not completely solved the issue for correctly computing generation numbers for mixed layers. That follows in the next change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-01commit-graph: compute generations separatelyLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-14/+56
The compute_generation_numbers() method was introduced by 3258c663 (commit-graph: compute generation numbers, 2018-05-01) to compute what is now known as "topological levels". These are still stored in the commit-graph file for compatibility sake while c1a09119 (commit-graph: implement corrected commit date, 2021-01-16) updated the method to also compute the new version of generation numbers: corrected commit date. It makes sense why these are grouped. They perform very similar walks of the necessary commits and compute similar maximums over each parent. However, having these two together conflates them in subtle ways that is hard to separate. In particular, the topo_level slab is used to store the topological levels in all cases, but the commit_graph_data_at(c)->generation member stores different values depending on the state of the existing commit-graph file. * If the existing commit-graph file has a "GDAT" chunk, then these values represent corrected commit dates. * If the existing commit-graph file doesn't have a "GDAT" chunk, then these values are actually the topological levels. This issue only occurs only when upgrading an existing commit-graph file into one that has the "GDAT" chunk. The current change does not resolve this upgrade problem, but splitting the implementation into two pieces here helps with that process, which will follow in the next change. The important thing this helps with is the case where the num_generation_data_overflows was being incremented incorrectly, triggering a write of the overflow chunk. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-01commit-graph: validate layers for generation dataLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-6/+16
We need to be extra careful that we don't use corrected commit dates from any layer of a commit-graph chain if there is a single commit-graph file that is missing the generation_data chunk. Update validate_mixed_generation_chain() to correctly update each layer to ignore the generation_data chunk in this case. It now also returns 1 if all layers have a generation_data chunk. This return value will be used in the next change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-01commit-graph: always parse before commit_graph_data_at()Libravatar Derrick Stolee1-4/+12
There is a subtle failure happening when computing corrected commit dates with --split enabled. It requires a base layer needing the generation_data_overflow chunk. Then, the next layer on top erroneously thinks it needs an overflow chunk due to a bug leading to recalculating all reachable generation numbers. The output of the failure is BUG: commit-graph.c:1912: expected to write 8 bytes to chunk 47444f56, but wrote 0 instead These "expected" 8 bytes are due to re-computing the corrected commit date for the lower layer but the new layer does not need any overflow. Add a test to t5318-commit-graph.sh that demonstrates this bug. However, it does not trigger consistently with the existing code. The generation number data is stored in a slab and accessed by commit_graph_data_at(). This data is initialized when parsing a commit, but is otherwise used assuming it has been populated. The loop in compute_generation_numbers() did not enforce that all reachable commits were parsed and had correct values. This could lead to some problems when writing a commit-graph with corrected commit dates based on a commit-graph without them. It has been difficult to identify the issue here because it was so hard to reproduce. It relies on this uninitialized data having a non-zero value, but also on specifically in a way that overwrites the existing data. This patch adds the extra parse to ensure the data is filled before we compute the generation number of a commit. This triggers the new test to fail because the generation number overflow count does not match between this computation and the write for that chunk. The actual fix will follow as the next few changes. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-01commit-graph: use repo_parse_commitLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-5/+5
The write_commit_graph_context has a repository pointer, so use it. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28oid_pos(): access table through const pointersLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
When we are looking up an oid in an array, we obviously don't need to write to the array. Let's mark it as const in the function interfaces, as well as in the local variables we use to derference the void pointer (note a few cases use pointers-to-pointers, so we mark everything const). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-28hash_pos(): convert to oid_pos()Libravatar Jeff King1-14/+14
All of our callers are actually looking up an object_id, not a bare hash. Likewise, the arrays they are looking in are actual arrays of object_id (not just raw bytes of hashes, as we might find in a pack .idx; those are handled by bsearch_hash()). Using an object_id gives us more type safety, and makes the callers slightly shorter. It also gets rid of the word "sha1" from several access functions, though we could obviously also rename those with s/sha1/hash/. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25Merge branch 'ma/more-opaque-lock-file'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Code clean-up. * ma/more-opaque-lock-file: read-cache: try not to peek into `struct {lock_,temp}file` refs/files-backend: don't peek into `struct lock_file` midx: don't peek into `struct lock_file` commit-graph: don't peek into `struct lock_file` builtin/gc: don't peek into `struct lock_file`
2021-01-21refs: switch peel_ref() to peel_iterated_oid()Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
The peel_ref() interface is confusing and error-prone: - it's typically used by ref iteration callbacks that have both a refname and oid. But since they pass only the refname, we may load the ref value from the filesystem again. This is inefficient, but also means we are open to a race if somebody simultaneously updates the ref. E.g., this: int some_ref_cb(const char *refname, const struct object_id *oid, ...) { if (!peel_ref(refname, &peeled)) printf("%s peels to %s", oid_to_hex(oid), oid_to_hex(&peeled); } could print nonsense. It is correct to say "refname peels to..." (you may see the "before" value or the "after" value, either of which is consistent), but mentioning both oids may be mixing before/after values. Worse, whether this is possible depends on whether the optimization to read from the current iterator value kicks in. So it is actually not possible with: for_each_ref(some_ref_cb); but it _is_ possible with: head_ref(some_ref_cb); which does not use the iterator mechanism (though in practice, HEAD should never peel to anything, so this may not be triggerable). - it must take a fully-qualified refname for the read_ref_full() code path to work. Yet we routinely pass it partial refnames from callbacks to for_each_tag_ref(), etc. This happens to work when iterating because there we do not call read_ref_full() at all, and only use the passed refname to check if it is the same as the iterator. But the requirements for the function parameters are quite unclear. Instead of taking a refname, let's instead take an oid. That fixes both problems. It's a little funny for a "ref" function not to involve refs at all. The key thing is that it's optimizing under the hood based on having access to the ref iterator. So let's change the name to make it clear why you'd want this function versus just peel_object(). There are two other directions I considered but rejected: - we could pass the peel information into the each_ref_fn callback. However, we don't know if the caller actually wants it or not. For packed-refs, providing it is essentially free. But for loose refs, we actually have to peel the object, which would be wasteful in most cases. We could likewise pass in a flag to the callback indicating whether the peeled information is known, but that complicates those callbacks, as they then have to decide whether to manually peel themselves. Plus it requires changing the interface of every callback, whether they care about peeling or not, and there are many of them. - we could make a function to return the peeled value of the current iterated ref (computing it if necessary), and BUG() otherwise. I.e.: int peel_current_iterated_ref(struct object_id *out); Each of the current callers is an each_ref_fn callback, so they'd mostly be happy. But: - we use those callbacks with functions like head_ref(), which do not use the iteration code. So we'd need to handle the fallback case there, anyway. - it's possible that a caller would want to call into generic code that sometimes is used during iteration and sometimes not. This encapsulates the logic to do the fast thing when possible, and fallback when necessary. The implementation is mostly obvious, but I want to call out a few things in the patch: - the test-tool coverage for peel_ref() is now meaningless, as it all collapses to a single peel_object() call (arguably they were pretty uninteresting before; the tricky part of that function is the fast-path we see during iteration, but these calls didn't trigger that). I've just dropped it entirely, though note that some other tests relied on the tags we created; I've moved that creation to the tests where it matters. - we no longer need to take a ref_store parameter, since we'd never look up a ref now. We do still rely on a global "current iterator" variable which _could_ be kept per-ref-store. But in practice this is only useful if there are multiple recursive iterations, at which point the more appropriate solution is probably a stack of iterators. No caller used the actual ref-store parameter anyway (they all call the wrapper that passes the_repository). - the original only kicked in the optimization when the "refname" pointer matched (i.e., not string comparison). We do likewise with the "oid" parameter here, but fall back to doing an actual oideq() call. This in theory lets us kick in the optimization more often, though in practice no current caller cares. It should never be wrong, though (peeling is a property of an object, so two refs pointing to the same object would peel identically). - the original took care not to touch the peeled out-parameter unless we found something to put in it. But no caller cares about this, and anyway, it is enforced by peel_object() itself (and even in the optimized iterator case, that's where we eventually end up). We can shorten the code and avoid an extra copy by just passing the out-parameter through the stack. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common()Libravatar Abhishek Kumar1-0/+14
091f4cf (commit: don't use generation numbers if not needed, 2018-08-30) changed paint_down_to_common() to use commit dates instead of generation numbers v1 (topological levels) as the performance regressed on certain topologies. With generation number v2 (corrected commit dates) implemented, we no longer have to rely on commit dates and can use generation numbers. For example, the command `git merge-base v4.8 v4.9` on the Linux repository walks 167468 commits, taking 0.135s for committer date and 167496 commits, taking 0.157s for corrected committer date respectively. While using corrected commit dates, Git walks nearly the same number of commits as commit date, the process is slower as for each comparision we have to access a commit-slab (for corrected committer date) instead of accessing struct member (for committer date). This change incidentally broke the fragile t6404-recursive-merge test. t6404-recursive-merge sets up a unique repository where all commits have the same committer date without a well-defined merge-base. While running tests with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH unset, we use committer date as a heuristic in paint_down_to_common(). 6404.1 'combined merge conflicts' merges commits in the order: - Merge C with B to form an intermediate commit. - Merge the intermediate commit with A. With GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1, we write a commit-graph and subsequently use the corrected committer date, which changes the order in which commits are merged: - Merge A with B to form an intermediate commit. - Merge the intermediate commit with C. While resulting repositories are equivalent, 6404.4 'virtual trees were processed' fails with GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=1 as we are selecting different merge-bases and thus have different object ids for the intermediate commits. As this has already causes problems (as noted in 859fdc0 (commit-graph: define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH, 2018-08-29)), we disable commit graph within t6404-recursive-merge. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: use generation v2 only if entire chain doesLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-2/+28
Since there are released versions of Git that understand generation numbers in the commit-graph's CDAT chunk but do not understand the GDAT chunk, the following scenario is possible: 1. "New" Git writes a commit-graph with the GDAT chunk. 2. "Old" Git writes a split commit-graph on top without a GDAT chunk. If each layer of split commit-graph is treated independently, as it was the case before this commit, with Git inspecting only the current layer for chunk_generation_data pointer, commits in the lower layer (one with GDAT) whould have corrected commit date as their generation number, while commits in the upper layer would have topological levels as their generation. Corrected commit dates usually have much larger values than topological levels. This means that if we take two commits, one from the upper layer, and one reachable from it in the lower layer, then the expectation that the generation of a parent is smaller than the generation of a child would be violated. It is difficult to expose this issue in a test. Since we _start_ with artificially low generation numbers, any commit walk that prioritizes generation numbers will walk all of the commits with high generation number before walking the commits with low generation number. In all the cases I tried, the commit-graph layers themselves "protect" any incorrect behavior since none of the commits in the lower layer can reach the commits in the upper layer. This issue would manifest itself as a performance problem in this case, especially with something like "git log --graph" since the low generation numbers would cause the in-degree queue to walk all of the commits in the lower layer before allowing the topo-order queue to write anything to output (depending on the size of the upper layer). Therefore, When writing the new layer in split commit-graph, we write a GDAT chunk only if the topmost layer has a GDAT chunk. This guarantees that if a layer has GDAT chunk, all lower layers must have a GDAT chunk as well. Rewriting layers follows similar approach: if the topmost layer below the set of layers being rewritten (in the split commit-graph chain) exists, and it does not contain GDAT chunk, then the result of rewrite does not have GDAT chunks either. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: implement generation data chunkLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-11/+103
As discovered by Ævar, we cannot increment graph version to distinguish between generation numbers v1 and v2 [1]. Thus, one of pre-requistes before implementing generation number v2 was to distinguish between graph versions in a backwards compatible manner. We are going to introduce a new chunk called Generation DATa chunk (or GDAT). GDAT will store corrected committer date offsets whereas CDAT will still store topological level. Old Git does not understand GDAT chunk and would ignore it, reading topological levels from CDAT. New Git can parse GDAT and take advantage of newer generation numbers, falling back to topological levels when GDAT chunk is missing (as it would happen with a commit-graph written by old Git). We introduce a test environment variable 'GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT' which forces commit-graph file to be written without generation data chunk to emulate a commit-graph file written by old Git. To minimize the space required to store corrrected commit date, Git stores corrected commit date offsets into the commit-graph file, instea of corrected commit dates. This saves us 4 bytes per commit, decreasing the GDAT chunk size by half, but it's possible for the offset to overflow the 4-bytes allocated for storage. As such overflows are and should be exceedingly rare, we use the following overflow management scheme: We introduce a new commit-graph chunk, Generation Data OVerflow ('GDOV') to store corrected commit dates for commits with offsets greater than GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX. If the offset is greater than GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX, we set the MSB of the offset and the other bits store the position of corrected commit date in GDOV chunk, similar to how Extra Edge List is maintained. We test the overflow-related code with the following repo history: F - N - U / \ U - N - U N \ / N - F - N Where the commits denoted by U have committer date of zero seconds since Unix epoch, the commits denoted by N have committer date of 1112354055 (default committer date for the test suite) seconds since Unix epoch and the commits denoted by F have committer date of (2 ^ 31 - 2) seconds since Unix epoch. The largest offset observed is 2 ^ 31, just large enough to overflow. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a7gdspo4.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: implement corrected commit dateLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-4/+17
With most of preparations done, let's implement corrected commit date. The corrected commit date for a commit is defined as: * A commit with no parents (a root commit) has corrected commit date equal to its committer date. * A commit with at least one parent has corrected commit date equal to the maximum of its commit date and one more than the largest corrected commit date among its parents. As a special case, a root commit with timestamp of zero (01.01.1970 00:00:00Z) has corrected commit date of one, to be able to distinguish from GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO (that is, an uncomputed corrected commit date). To minimize the space required to store corrected commit date, Git stores corrected commit date offsets into the commit-graph file. The corrected commit date offset for a commit is defined as the difference between its corrected commit date and actual commit date. Storing corrected commit date requires sizeof(timestamp_t) bytes, which in most cases is 64 bits (uintmax_t). However, corrected commit date offsets can be safely stored using only 32-bits. This halves the size of GDAT chunk, which is a reduction of around 6% in the size of commit-graph file. However, using offsets be problematic if a commit is malformed but valid and has committer date of 0 Unix time, as the offset would be the same as corrected commit date and thus require 64-bits to be stored properly. While Git does not write out offsets at this stage, Git stores the corrected commit dates in member generation of struct commit_graph_data. It will begin writing commit date offsets with the introduction of generation data chunk. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: return 64-bit generation numberLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-11/+11
In a preparatory step for introducing corrected commit dates, let's return timestamp_t values from commit_graph_generation(), use timestamp_t for local variables and define GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY as (2 ^ 63 - 1) instead. We rename GENERATION_NUMBER_MAX to GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX to represent the largest topological level we can store in the commit data chunk. With corrected commit dates implemented, we will have two such *_MAX variables to denote the largest offset and largest topological level that can be stored. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: add a slab to store topological levelsLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-15/+30
In a later commit we will introduce corrected commit date as the generation number v2. Corrected commit dates will be stored in the new seperate Generation Data chunk. However, to ensure backwards compatibility with "Old" Git we need to continue to write generation number v1 (topological levels) to the commit data chunk. Thus, we need to compute and store both versions of generation numbers to write the commit-graph file. Therefore, let's introduce a commit-slab `topo_level_slab` to store topological levels; corrected commit date will be stored in the member `generation` of struct commit_graph_data. The macros `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY` and `GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO` mark commits not in the commit-graph file and commits written by a version of Git that did not compute generation numbers respectively. Generation numbers are computed identically for both kinds of commits. A "slab-miss" should return `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY` as the commit is not in the commit-graph file. However, since the slab is zero-initialized, it returns 0 (or rather `GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO`). Thus, we no longer need to check if the topological level of a commit is `GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY`. We will add a pointer to the slab in `struct write_commit_graph_context` and `struct commit_graph` to populate the slab in `fill_commit_graph_info` if the commit has a pre-computed topological level as in case of split commit-graphs. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_infoLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-17/+10
Both fill_commit_graph_info() and fill_commit_in_graph() parse information present in commit data chunk. Let's simplify the implementation by calling fill_commit_graph_info() within fill_commit_in_graph(). fill_commit_graph_info() used to not load committer data from commit data chunk. However, with the upcoming switch to using corrected committer date as generation number v2, we will have to load committer date to compute generation number value anyway. e51217e15 (t5000: test tar files that overflow ustar headers, 30-06-2016) introduced a test 'generate tar with future mtime' that creates a commit with committer date of (2^36 + 1) seconds since EPOCH. The CDAT chunk provides 34-bits for storing committer date, thus committer time overflows into generation number (within CDAT chunk) and has undefined behavior. The test used to pass as fill_commit_graph_info() would not set struct member `date` of struct commit and load committer date from the object database, generating a tar file with the expected mtime. However, with corrected commit date, we will load the committer date from CDAT chunk (truncated to lower 34-bits to populate the generation number. Thus, Git sets date and generates tar file with the truncated mtime. The ustar format (the header format used by most modern tar programs) only has room for 11 (or 12, depending on some implementations) octal digits for the size and mtime of each file. As the CDAT chunk is overflow by 12-octal digits but not 11-octal digits, we split the existing tests to test both implementations separately and add a new explicit test for 11-digit implementation. To test the 11-octal digit implementation, we create a future commit with committer date of 2^34 - 1, which overflows 11-octal digits without overflowing 34-bits of the Commit Date chunks. To test the 12-octal digit implementation, the smallest committer date possible is 2^36 + 1, which overflows the CDAT chunk and thus commit-graph must be disabled for the test. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-18commit-graph: fix regression when computing Bloom filtersLibravatar Abhishek Kumar1-2/+6
Before computing Bloom filters, the commit-graph machinery uses commit_gen_cmp to sort commits by generation order for improved diff performance. 3d11275505 (commit-graph: examine commits by generation number, 2020-03-30) claims that this sort can reduce the time spent to compute Bloom filters by nearly half. But since c49c82aa4c (commit: move members graph_pos, generation to a slab, 2020-06-17), this optimization is broken, since asking for a 'commit_graph_generation()' directly returns GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY while writing. Not all hope is lost, though: 'commit_gen_cmp()' falls back to comparing commits by their date when they have equal generation number, and so since c49c82aa4c is purely a date comparison function. This heuristic is good enough that we don't seem to loose appreciable performance while computing Bloom filters. Applying this patch (compared with v2.30.0) speeds up computing Bloom filters by factors ranging from 0.40% to 5.19% on various repositories [1]. So, avoid the useless 'commit_graph_generation()' while writing by instead accessing the slab directly. This returns the newly-computed generation numbers, and allows us to avoid the heuristic by directly comparing generation numbers. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20210105094535.GN8396@szeder.dev/ Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-06commit-graph: don't peek into `struct lock_file`Libravatar Martin Ågren1-3/+3
Similar to the previous commit, avoid peeking into the `struct lock_file`. Use the lock file API instead. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-04hash-lookup: rename from sha1-lookupLibravatar Martin Ågren1-1/+1
Change all remnants of "sha1" in hash-lookup.c and .h and rename them to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-04sha1-lookup: rename `sha1_pos()` as `hash_pos()`Libravatar Martin Ågren1-3/+3
Rename this function to reflect that we're not just able to handle SHA-1 these days. There are a few instances of "sha1" left in sha1-lookup.[ch] after this, but those will be addressed in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>