summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/commit-graph.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-12-10Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-delay-gen-progress'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
One kind of progress messages were always given during commit-graph generation, instead of following the "if it takes more than two seconds, show progress" pattern, which has been corrected. * ds/commit-graph-delay-gen-progress: commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress() progress: create GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY
2019-12-01Merge branch 'en/doc-typofix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Docfix. * en/doc-typofix: Fix spelling errors in no-longer-updated-from-upstream modules multimail: fix a few simple spelling errors sha1dc: fix trivial comment spelling error Fix spelling errors in test commands Fix spelling errors in messages shown to users Fix spelling errors in names of tests Fix spelling errors in comments of testcases Fix spelling errors in code comments Fix spelling errors in documentation outside of Documentation/ Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and new
2019-12-01Merge branch 'jk/cleanup-object-parsing-and-fsck'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+0
Crufty code and logic accumulated over time around the object parsing and low-level object access used in "git fsck" have been cleaned up. * jk/cleanup-object-parsing-and-fsck: (23 commits) fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tree" for fsck_tree() fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct commit" for fsck_commit() fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct tag" for fsck_tag() fsck: rename vague "oid" local variables fsck: don't require an object struct in verify_headers() fsck: don't require an object struct for fsck_ident() fsck: drop blob struct from fsck_finish() fsck: accept an oid instead of a "struct blob" for fsck_blob() fsck: don't require an object struct for report() fsck: only require an oid for skiplist functions fsck: only provide oid/type in fsck_error callback fsck: don't require object structs for display functions fsck: use oids rather than objects for object_name API fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive fsck: unify object-name code fsck: require an actual buffer for non-blobs fsck: stop checking tag->tagged fsck: stop checking commit->parent counts fsck: stop checking commit->tree value commit, tag: don't set parsed bit for parse failures ...
2019-11-27commit-graph: use start_delayed_progress()Libravatar Derrick Stolee1-1/+1
When writing a commit-graph, we show progress along several commit walks. When we use start_delayed_progress(), the progress line will only appear if that step takes a decent amount of time. However, one place was missed: computing generation numbers. This is normally a very fast operation as all commits have been parsed in a previous step. But, this is showing up for all users no matter how few commits are being added. The tests that check for the progress output have already been updated to use GIT_PROGRESS_DELAY=0 to force the expected output. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reported-by: ryenus <ryenus@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Fix spelling errors in code commentsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-04Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-on-fetch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+7
Regression fix. * ds/commit-graph-on-fetch: commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetch t5510-fetch.sh: demonstrate fetch.writeCommitGraph bug
2019-10-28commit, tag: don't set parsed bit for parse failuresLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+0
If we can't parse a commit, then parse_commit() will return an error code. But it _also_ sets the "parsed" flag, which tells us not to bother trying to re-parse the object. That means that subsequent parses have no idea that the information in the struct may be bogus. I.e., doing this: parse_commit(commit); ... if (parse_commit(commit) < 0) die("commit is broken"); will never trigger the die(). The second parse_commit() will see the "parsed" flag and quietly return success. There are two obvious ways to fix this: 1. Stop setting "parsed" until we've successfully parsed. 2. Keep a second "corrupt" flag to indicate that we saw an error (and when the parsed flag is set, return 0/-1 depending on the corrupt flag). This patch does option 1. The obvious downside versus option 2 is that we might continually re-parse a broken object. But in practice, corruption like this is rare, and we typically die() or return an error in the caller. So it's OK not to worry about optimizing for corruption. And it's much simpler: we don't need to use an extra bit in the object struct, and callers which check the "parsed" flag don't need to learn about the corrupt bit, too. There's no new test here, because this case is already covered in t5318. Note that we do need to update the expected message there, because we now detect the problem in the return from "parse_commit()", and not with a separate check for a NULL tree. In fact, we can now ditch that explicit tree check entirely, as we're covered robustly by this change (and the previous recent change to treat a NULL tree as a parse error). We'll also give tags the same treatment. I don't know offhand of any cases where the problem can be triggered (it implies somebody ignoring a parse error earlier in the process), but consistently returning an error should cause the least surprise. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-25commit-graph: fix writing first commit-graph during fetchLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-4/+7
The previous commit includes a failing test for an issue around fetch.writeCommitGraph and fetching in a repo with a submodule. Here, we fix that bug and set the test to "test_expect_success". The problem arises with this set of commands when the remote repo at <url> has a submodule. Note that --recurse-submodules is not needed to demonstrate the bug. $ git clone <url> test $ cd test $ git -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true fetch origin Computing commit graph generation numbers: 100% (12/12), done. BUG: commit-graph.c:886: missing parent <hash1> for commit <hash2> Aborted (core dumped) As an initial fix, I converted the code in builtin/fetch.c that calls write_commit_graph_reachable() to instead launch a "git commit-graph write --reachable --split" process. That code worked, but is not how we want the feature to work long-term. That test did demonstrate that the issue must be something to do with internal state of the 'git fetch' process. The write_commit_graph() method in commit-graph.c ensures the commits we plan to write are "closed under reachability" using close_reachable(). This method walks from the input commits, and uses the UNINTERESTING flag to mark which commits have already been visited. This allows the walk to take O(N) time, where N is the number of commits, instead of O(P) time, where P is the number of paths. (The number of paths can be exponential in the number of commits.) However, the UNINTERESTING flag is used in lots of places in the codebase. This flag usually means some barrier to stop a commit walk, such as in revision-walking to compare histories. It is not often cleared after the walk completes because the starting points of those walks do not have the UNINTERESTING flag, and clear_commit_marks() would stop immediately. This is happening during a 'git fetch' call with a remote. The fetch negotiation is comparing the remote refs with the local refs and marking some commits as UNINTERESTING. I tested running clear_commit_marks_many() to clear the UNINTERESTING flag inside close_reachable(), but the tips did not have the flag, so that did nothing. It turns out that the calculate_changed_submodule_paths() method is at fault. Thanks, Peff, for pointing out this detail! More specifically, for each submodule, the collect_changed_submodules() runs a revision walk to essentially do file-history on the list of submodules. That revision walk marks commits UNININTERESTING if they are simplified away by not changing the submodule. Instead, I finally arrived on the conclusion that I should use a flag that is not used in any other part of the code. In commit-reach.c, a number of flags were defined for commit walk algorithms. The REACHABLE flag seemed like it made the most sense, and it seems it was not actually used in the file. The REACHABLE flag was used in early versions of commit-reach.c, but was removed by 4fbcca4 (commit-reach: make can_all_from_reach... linear, 2018-07-20). Add the REACHABLE flag to commit-graph.c and use it instead of UNINTERESTING in close_reachable(). This fixes the bug in manual testing. Reported-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-09Merge branch 'ah/cleanups'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
Miscellaneous code clean-ups. * ah/cleanups: git_mkstemps_mode(): replace magic numbers with computed value wrapper: use a loop instead of repetitive statements diffcore-break: use a goto instead of a redundant if statement commit-graph: remove a duplicate assignment
2019-10-07Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-harden'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+9
The code to parse and use the commit-graph file has been made more robust against corrupted input. * tb/commit-graph-harden: commit-graph.c: handle corrupt/missing trees commit-graph.c: handle commit parsing errors t/t5318: introduce failing 'git commit-graph write' tests
2019-10-07Merge branch 'gs/commit-graph-progress'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
* gs/commit-graph-progress: commit-graph: add --[no-]progress to write and verify
2019-10-07Merge branch 'rs/commit-graph-use-list-count'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+6
Code cleanup. * rs/commit-graph-use-list-count: commit-graph: use commit_list_count()
2019-10-07Merge branch 'jk/disable-commit-graph-during-upload-pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+15
The "upload-pack" (the counterpart of "git fetch") needs to disable commit-graph when responding to a shallow clone/fetch request, but the way this was done made Git panic, which has been corrected. * jk/disable-commit-graph-during-upload-pack: upload-pack: disable commit graph more gently for shallow traversal commit-graph: bump DIE_ON_LOAD check to actual load-time
2019-10-07Merge branch 'jk/commit-graph-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
A pair of small fixups to "git commit-graph" have been applied. * jk/commit-graph-cleanup: commit-graph: turn off save_commit_buffer commit-graph: don't show progress percentages while expanding reachable commits
2019-10-02commit-graph: remove a duplicate assignmentLibravatar Alex Henrie1-2/+3
Leave the variable 'g' uninitialized before it is set just before its first use in front of a loop, which is a much more appropriate place to indicate what it is used for. Also initialize the variable 'num_commits' just before the loop instead of at the beginning of the function for the same reason. Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-18commit-graph: add --[no-]progress to write and verifyLibravatar Garima Singh1-2/+4
Add --[no-]progress to git commit-graph write and verify. The progress feature was introduced in 7b0f229 ("commit-graph write: add progress output", 2018-09-17) but the ability to opt-out was overlooked. Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-16commit-graph: use commit_list_count()Libravatar René Scharfe1-11/+6
Let commit_list_count() count the number of parents instead of duplicating it. Also store the result in an unsigned int, as that's what the function returns, and the count is never negative. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-12upload-pack: disable commit graph more gently for shallow traversalLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+12
When the client has asked for certain shallow options like "deepen-since", we do a custom rev-list walk that pretends to be shallow. Before doing so, we have to disable the commit-graph, since it is not compatible with the shallow view of the repository. That's handled by 829a321569 (commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk, 2018-08-20). That commit literally closes and frees our repo->objects->commit_graph struct. That creates an interesting problem for commits that have _already_ been parsed using the commit graph. Their commit->object.parsed flag is set, their commit->graph_pos is set, but their commit->maybe_tree may still be NULL. When somebody later calls repo_get_commit_tree(), we see that we haven't loaded the tree oid yet and try to get it from the commit graph. But since it has been freed, we segfault! So the root of the issue is a data dependency between the commit's lazy-load of the tree oid and the fact that the commit graph can go away mid-process. How can we resolve it? There are a couple of general approaches: 1. The obvious answer is to avoid loading the tree from the graph when we see that it's NULL. But then what do we return for the tree oid? If we return NULL, our caller in do_traverse() will rightly complain that we have no tree. We'd have to fallback to loading the actual commit object and re-parsing it. That requires teaching parse_commit_buffer() to understand re-parsing (i.e., not starting from a clean slate and not leaking any allocated bits like parent list pointers). 2. When we close the commit graph, walk through the set of in-memory objects and clear any graph_pos pointers. But this means we also have to "unparse" any such commits so that we know they still need to open the commit object to fill in their trees. So it's no less complicated than (1), and is more expensive (since we clear objects we might not later need). 3. Stop freeing the commit-graph struct. Continue to let it be used for lazy-loads of tree oids, but let upload-pack specify that it shouldn't be used for further commit parsing. 4. Push the whole shallow rev-list out to its own sub-process, with the commit-graph disabled from the start, giving it a clean memory space to work from. I've chosen (3) here. Options (1) and (2) would work, but are non-trivial to implement. Option (4) is more expensive, and I'm not sure how complicated it is (shelling out for the actual rev-list part is easy, but we do then parse the resulting commits internally, and I'm not clear which parts need to be handling shallow-ness). The new test in t5500 triggers this segfault, but see the comments there for how horribly intimate it has to be with how both upload-pack and commit graphs work. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-12commit-graph: bump DIE_ON_LOAD check to actual load-timeLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+4
Commit 43d3561805 (commit-graph write: don't die if the existing graph is corrupt, 2019-03-25) added an environment variable we use only in the test suite, $GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_LOAD. But it put the check for this variable at the very top of prepare_commit_graph(), which is called every time we want to use the commit graph. Most importantly, it comes _before_ we check the fast-path "did we already try to load?", meaning we end up calling getenv() for every single use of the commit graph, rather than just when we load. getenv() is allowed to have unexpected side effects, but that shouldn't be a problem here; we're lazy-loading the graph so it's clear that at least _one_ invocation of this function is going to call it. But it is inefficient. getenv() typically has to do a linear search through the environment space. We could memoize the call, but it's simpler still to just bump the check down to the actual loading step. That's fine for our sole user in t5318, and produces this minor real-world speedup: [before] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 1.460 s ± 0.017 s [User: 1.174 s, System: 0.285 s] Range (min … max): 1.440 s … 1.491 s 10 runs [after] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 1.391 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.118 s, System: 0.273 s] Range (min … max): 1.385 s … 1.399 s 10 runs Of course that actual speedup depends on how big your environment is. We can game it like this: for i in $(seq 10000); do export dummy$i=$i done in which case I get: [before] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 6.257 s ± 0.061 s [User: 6.005 s, System: 0.250 s] Range (min … max): 6.174 s … 6.337 s 10 runs [after] Benchmark #1: git -C linux rev-list HEAD >/dev/null Time (mean ± σ): 1.403 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.146 s, System: 0.256 s] Range (min … max): 1.396 s … 1.412 s 10 runs So this is really more about avoiding the pathological case than providing a big real-world speedup. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-09Merge branch 'ds/feature-macros'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
A mechanism to affect the default setting for a (related) group of configuration variables is introduced. * ds/feature-macros: repo-settings: create feature.experimental setting repo-settings: create feature.manyFiles setting repo-settings: parse core.untrackedCache commit-graph: turn on commit-graph by default t6501: use 'git gc' in quiet mode repo-settings: consolidate some config settings
2019-09-09commit-graph: don't show progress percentages while expanding reachable commitsLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-1/+1
Commit 49bbc57a57 (commit-graph write: emit a percentage for all progress, 2019-01-19) was a bit overeager when it added progress percentages to the "Expanding reachable commits in commit graph" phase as well, because most of the time the number of commits that phase has to iterate over is not known in advance and grows significantly, and, consequently, we end up with nonsensical numbers: $ git commit-graph write --reachable Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 138606% (824706/595), done. [...] $ git rev-parse v5.0 | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits Expanding reachable commits in commit graph: 81264400% (812644/1), done. [...] Even worse, because the percentage grows so quickly, the progress code outputs much more often than it should (because it ticks every second, or every 1%), slowing the whole process down. My time for "git commit-graph write --reachable" on linux.git went from 13.463s to 12.521s with this patch, ~7% savings. Therefore, don't show progress percentages in the "Expanding reachable commits in commit graph" phase. Note that the current code does sometimes do the right thing, if we picked up all commits initially (e.g., omitting "--reachable" in a fully-packed repository would get the correct count without any parent traversal). So it may be possible to come up with a way to tell when we could use a percentage here. But in the meantime, let's make sure we robustly avoid printing nonsense. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-09commit-graph.c: handle corrupt/missing treesLibravatar Taylor Blau1-1/+6
Apply similar treatment as in the previous commit to handle an unchecked call to 'get_commit_tree_oid()'. Previously, a NULL return value from this function would be immediately dereferenced with '->hash', and then cause a segfault. Before dereferencing to access the 'hash' member, check the return value of 'get_commit_tree_oid()' to make sure that it is not NULL. To make this check correct, a related change is also needed in 'commit.c', which is to check the return value of 'get_commit_tree' before taking its address. If 'get_commit_tree' returns NULL, we encounter an undefined behavior when taking the address of the return value of 'get_commit_tree' and then taking '->object.oid'. (On my system, this is memory address 0x8, which is obviously wrong). Fix this by making sure that 'get_commit_tree' returns something non-NULL before digging through a structure that is not there, thus preventing a segfault down the line in the commit graph code. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-09commit-graph.c: handle commit parsing errorsLibravatar Taylor Blau1-1/+3
To write a commit graph chunk, 'write_graph_chunk_data()' takes a list of commits to write and parses each one before writing the necessary data, and continuing on to the next commit in the list. Since the majority of these commits are not parsed ahead of time (an exception is made for the *last* commit in the list, which is parsed early within 'copy_oids_to_commits'), it is possible that calling 'parse_commit_no_graph()' on them may return an error. Failing to catch these errors before de-referencing later calls can result in a undefined memory access and a SIGSEGV. One such example of this is 'get_commit_tree_oid()', which expects a parsed object as its input (in this case, the commit-graph code passes '*list'). If '*list' causes a parse error, the subsequent call will fail. Prevent such an issue by checking the return value of 'parse_commit_no_graph()' to avoid passing an unparsed object to a function which expects a parsed object, thus preventing a segfault. It is worth noting that this fix is really skirting around the issue in object.c's 'parse_object()', which makes it difficult to tell how corrupt an object is without digging into it. Presumably one could change the meaning of 'parse_object' returns, but this would require adjusting each callsite accordingly. Instead of that, add an additional check to the object parsed. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-22Merge branch 'sg/commit-graph-validate'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-17/+23
The code to write commit-graph over given commit object names has been made a bit more robust. * sg/commit-graph-validate: commit-graph: error out on invalid commit oids in 'write --stdin-commits' commit-graph: turn a group of write-related macro flags into an enum t5318-commit-graph: use 'test_expect_code'
2019-08-13repo-settings: consolidate some config settingsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-3/+3
There are a few important config settings that are not loaded during git_default_config. These are instead loaded on-demand. Centralize these config options to a single scan, and store all of the values in a repo_settings struct. The values for each setting are initialized as negative to indicate "unset". This centralization will be particularly important in a later change to introduce "meta" config settings that change the defaults for these config settings. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-09Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-incremental'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+7
Leakfix. * ds/commit-graph-incremental: commit-graph: release strbufs after use
2019-08-07commit-graph: release strbufs after useLibravatar René Scharfe1-5/+7
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05commit-graph: fix bug around octopus mergesLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-1/+1
In 1771be90 "commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains" (2019-06-18), the method sort_and_scan_merged_commits() was added to merge the commit lists of two commit-graph files in the incremental format. Unfortunately, there was an off-by-one error in that method around incrementing num_extra_edges, which leads to an incorrect offset for the base graph chunk. When we store an octopus merge in the commit-graph file, we store the first parent in the normal place, but use the second parent position to point into the "extra edges" chunk where the remaining parents exist. This means we should be adding "num_parents - 1" edges to this list, not "num_parents - 2". That is the basic error. The reason this was not caught in the test suite is more subtle. In 5324-split-commit-graph.sh, we test creating an octopus merge and adding it to the tip of a commit-graph chain, then verify the result. This _should_ have caught the problem, except that when we load the commit-graph files we were overly careful to not fail when the commit-graph chain does not match. This care was on purpose to avoid race conditions as one process reads the chain and another process modifies it. In such a case, the reading process outputs the following message to stderr: warning: commit-graph chain does not match These warnings are output in the test suite, but ignored. By checking the stderr of `git commit-graph verify` to include the expected progress output, it will now catch this error. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05commit-graph: error out on invalid commit oids in 'write --stdin-commits'Libravatar SZEDER Gábor1-12/+17
While 'git commit-graph write --stdin-commits' expects commit object ids as input, it accepts and silently skips over any invalid commit object ids, and still exits with success: # nonsense $ echo not-a-commit-oid | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits $ echo $? 0 # sometimes I forgot that refs are not good... $ echo HEAD | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits $ echo $? 0 # valid tree OID, but not a commit OID $ git rev-parse HEAD^{tree} | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits $ echo $? 0 $ ls -l .git/objects/info/commit-graph ls: cannot access '.git/objects/info/commit-graph': No such file or directory Check that all input records are indeed valid commit object ids and return with error otherwise, the same way '--stdin-packs' handles invalid input; see e103f7276f (commit-graph: return with errors during write, 2019-06-12). Note that it should only return with error when encountering an invalid commit object id coming from standard input. However, '--reachable' uses the same code path to process object ids pointed to by all refs, and that includes tag object ids as well, which should still be skipped over. Therefore add a new flag to 'enum commit_graph_write_flags' and a corresponding field to 'struct write_commit_graph_context', so we can differentiate between those two cases. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-05commit-graph: turn a group of write-related macro flags into an enumLibravatar SZEDER Gábor1-5/+6
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-19Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-incremental'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-49/+774
The commits in a repository can be described by multiple commit-graph files now, which allows the commit-graph files to be updated incrementally. * ds/commit-graph-incremental: commit-graph: test verify across alternates commit-graph: normalize commit-graph filenames commit-graph: test --split across alternate without --split commit-graph: test octopus merges with --split commit-graph: clean up chains after flattened write commit-graph: verify chains with --shallow mode commit-graph: create options for split files commit-graph: expire commit-graph files commit-graph: allow cross-alternate chains commit-graph: merge commit-graph chains commit-graph: add --split option to builtin commit-graph: write commit-graph chains commit-graph: rearrange chunk count logic commit-graph: add base graphs chunk commit-graph: load commit-graph chains commit-graph: rename commit_compare to oid_compare commit-graph: prepare for commit-graph chains commit-graph: document commit-graph chains
2019-07-09Merge branch 'jk/oidhash'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code clean-up to remove hardcoded SHA-1 hash from many places. * jk/oidhash: hashmap: convert sha1hash() to oidhash() hash.h: move object_id definition from cache.h khash: rename oid helper functions khash: drop sha1-specific map types pack-bitmap: convert khash_sha1 maps into kh_oid_map delta-islands: convert island_marks khash to use oids khash: rename kh_oid_t to kh_oid_set khash: drop broken oid_map typedef object: convert create_object() to use object_id object: convert internal hash_obj() to object_id object: convert lookup_object() to use object_id object: convert lookup_unknown_object() to use object_id pack-objects: convert locate_object_entry_hash() to object_id pack-objects: convert packlist_find() to use object_id pack-bitmap-write: convert some helpers to use object_id upload-pack: rename a "sha1" variable to "oid" describe: fix accidental oid/hash type-punning
2019-07-09Merge branch 'ds/close-object-store'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
The commit-graph file is now part of the "files that the runtime may keep open file descriptors on, all of which would need to be closed when done with the object store", and the file descriptor to an existing commit-graph file now is closed before "gc" finalizes a new instance to replace it. * ds/close-object-store: packfile: rename close_all_packs to close_object_store packfile: close commit-graph in close_all_packs commit-graph: use raw_object_store when closing
2019-07-09Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-write-refactor'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-271/+336
Renamed from commit-graph-format-v2 and changed scope. * ds/commit-graph-write-refactor: commit-graph: extract write_commit_graph_file() commit-graph: extract copy_oids_to_commits() commit-graph: extract count_distinct_commits() commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_all_packs() commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_commit_hex() commit-graph: extract fill_oids_from_packs() commit-graph: create write_commit_graph_context commit-graph: remove Future Work section commit-graph: collapse parameters into flags commit-graph: return with errors during write commit-graph: fix the_repository reference
2019-06-20object: convert create_object() to use object_idLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
There are no callers left of create_object() that aren't just passing us the "hash" member of a "struct object_id". Let's take the whole struct, which gets us closer to removing all raw sha1 variables. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: normalize commit-graph filenamesLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-7/+23
When writing commit-graph files, we append path data to an object directory, which may be specified by the user via the '--object-dir' option. If the user supplies a trailing slash, or some other alternative path format, the resulting path may be usable for writing to the correct location. However, when expiring graph files from the <obj-dir>/info/commit-graphs directory during a write, we need to compare paths with exact string matches. Normalize the commit-graph filenames to avoid ambiguity. This creates extra allocations, but this is a constant multiple of the number of commit-graph files, which should be a number in the single digits. Further normalize the object directory in the context. Due to a comparison between g->obj_dir and ctx->obj_dir in split_graph_merge_strategy(), a trailing slash would prevent any merging of layers within the same object directory. The check is there to ensure we do not merge across alternates. Update the tests to include a case with this trailing slash problem. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: clean up chains after flattened writeLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-3/+9
If we write a commit-graph file without the split option, then we write to $OBJDIR/info/commit-graph and start to ignore the chains in $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/. Unlink the commit-graph-chain file and expire the graph-{hash}.graph files in $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/ during every write. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: verify chains with --shallow modeLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-3/+12
If we wrote a commit-graph chain, we only modified the tip file in the chain. It is valuable to verify what we wrote, but not waste time checking files we did not write. Add a '--shallow' option to the 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand and check that it does not read the base graph in a two-file chain. Making the verify subcommand read from a chain of commit-graphs takes some rearranging of the builtin code. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: create options for split filesLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-11/+24
The split commit-graph feature is now fully implemented, but needs some more run-time configurability. Allow direct callers to 'git commit-graph write --split' to specify the values used in the merge strategy and the expire time. Update the documentation to specify these values. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: expire commit-graph filesLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+69
As we merge commit-graph files in a commit-graph chain, we should clean up the files that are no longer used. This change introduces an 'expiry_window' value to the context, which is always zero (for now). We then check the modified time of each graph-{hash}.graph file in the $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs folder and unlink the files that are older than the expiry_window. Since this is always zero, this immediately clears all unused graph files. We will update the value to match a config setting in a future change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: allow cross-alternate chainsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-11/+45
In an environment like a fork network, it is helpful to have a commit-graph chain that spans both the base repo and the fork repo. The fork is usually a small set of data on top of the large repo, but sometimes the fork is much larger. For example, git-for-windows/git has almost double the number of commits as git/git because it rebases its commits on every major version update. To allow cross-alternate commit-graph chains, we need a few pieces: 1. When looking for a graph-{hash}.graph file, check all alternates. 2. When merging commit-graph chains, do not merge across alternates. 3. When writing a new commit-graph chain based on a commit-graph file in another object directory, do not allow success if the base file has of the name "commit-graph" instead of "commit-graphs/graph-{hash}.graph". Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: merge commit-graph chainsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-33/+147
When searching for a commit in a commit-graph chain of G graphs with N commits, the search takes O(G log N) time. If we always add a new tip graph with every write, the linear G term will start to dominate and slow the lookup process. To keep lookups fast, but also keep most incremental writes fast, create a strategy for merging levels of the commit-graph chain. The strategy is detailed in the commit-graph design document, but is summarized by these two conditions: 1. If the number of commits we are adding is more than half the number of commits in the graph below, then merge with that graph. 2. If we are writing more than 64,000 commits into a single graph, then merge with all lower graphs. The numeric values in the conditions above are currently constant, but can become config options in a future update. As we merge levels of the commit-graph chain, check that the commits still exist in the repository. A garbage-collection operation may have removed those commits from the object store and we do not want to persist them in the commit-graph chain. This is a non-issue if the 'git gc' process wrote a new, single-level commit-graph file. After we merge levels, the old graph-{hash}.graph files are no longer referenced by the commit-graph-chain file. We will expire these files in a future change. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: add --split option to builtinLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-5/+9
Add a new "--split" option to the 'git commit-graph write' subcommand. This option allows the optional behavior of writing a commit-graph chain. The current behavior will add a tip commit-graph containing any commits that are not in the existing commit-graph or commit-graph chain. Later changes will allow merging the chain and expiring out-dated files. Add a new test script (t5324-split-commit-graph.sh) that demonstrates this behavior. Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: write commit-graph chainsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-11/+275
Extend write_commit_graph() to write a commit-graph chain when given the COMMIT_GRAPH_SPLIT flag. This implementation is purposefully simplistic in how it creates a new chain. The commits not already in the chain are added to a new tip commit-graph file. Much of the logic around writing a graph-{hash}.graph file and updating the commit-graph-chain file is the same as the commit-graph file case. However, there are several places where we need to do some extra logic in the split case. Track the list of graph filenames before and after the planned write. This will be more important when we start merging graph files, but it also allows us to upgrade our commit-graph file to the appropriate graph-{hash}.graph file when we upgrade to a chain of commit-graphs. Note that we use the eighth byte of the commit-graph header to store the number of base graph files. This determines the length of the base graphs chunk. A subtle change of behavior with the new logic is that we do not write a commit-graph if we our commit list is empty. This extends to the typical case, which is reflected in t5318-commit-graph.sh. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: rearrange chunk count logicLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-14/+21
The number of chunks in a commit-graph file can change depending on whether we need the Extra Edges Chunk. We are going to add more optional chunks, and it will be helpful to rearrange this logic around the chunk count before doing so. Specifically, we need to finalize the number of chunks before writing the commit-graph header. Further, we also need to fill out the chunk lookup table dynamically and using "num_chunks" as we add optional chunks is useful for adding optional chunks in the future. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: add base graphs chunkLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-0/+22
To quickly verify a commit-graph chain is valid on load, we will read from the new "Base Graphs Chunk" of each file in the chain. This will prevent accidentally loading incorrect data from manually editing the commit-graph-chain file or renaming graph-{hash}.graph files. The commit_graph struct already had an object_id struct "oid", but it was never initialized or used. Add a line to read the hash from the end of the commit-graph file and into the oid member. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: load commit-graph chainsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-6/+106
Prepare the logic for reading a chain of commit-graphs. First, look for a file at $OBJDIR/info/commit-graph. If it exists, then use that file and stop. Next, look for the chain file at $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/commit-graph-chain. If this file exists, then load the hash values as line-separated values in that file and load $OBJDIR/info/commit-graphs/graph-{hash[i]}.graph for each hash[i] in that file. The file is given in order, so the first hash corresponds to the "base" file and the final hash corresponds to the "tip" file. This implementation assumes that all of the graph-{hash}.graph files are in the same object directory as the commit-graph-chain file. This will be updated in a future change. This change is purposefully simple so we can isolate the different concerns. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: rename commit_compare to oid_compareLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-2/+2
The helper function commit_compare() actually compares object_id structs, not commits. A future change to commit-graph.c will need to sort commit structs, so rename this function in advance. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19commit-graph: prepare for commit-graph chainsLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-11/+78
To prepare for a chain of commit-graph files, augment the commit_graph struct to point to a base commit_graph. As we load commits from the graph, we may actually want to read from a base file according to the graph position. The "graph position" of a commit is given by concatenating the lexicographic commit orders from each of the commit-graph files in the chain. This means that we must distinguish two values: * lexicographic index : the position within the lexicographic order in a single commit-graph file. * graph position: the position within the concatenated order of multiple commit-graph files Given the lexicographic index of a commit in a graph, we can compute the graph position by adding the number of commits in the lower-level graphs. To find the lexicographic index of a commit, we subtract the number of commits in lower-level graphs. While here, change insert_parent_or_die() to take a uint32_t position, as that is the type used by its only caller and that makes more sense with the limits in the commit-graph format. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-12commit-graph: use raw_object_store when closingLibravatar Derrick Stolee1-4/+4
The close_commit_graph() method took a repository struct, but then only uses the raw_object_store within. Change the function prototype to make the method more flexible. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>