summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-01-12Merge branch 'maint-1.7.7' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+7
* maint-1.7.7: Update draft release notes to 1.7.7.6 Update draft release notes to 1.7.6.6 thin-pack: try harder to use preferred base objects as base
2012-01-12Merge branch 'maint-1.7.6' into maint-1.7.7Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+7
* maint-1.7.6: Update draft release notes to 1.7.6.6 thin-pack: try harder to use preferred base objects as base
2012-01-12thin-pack: try harder to use preferred base objects as baseLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+7
When creating a pack using objects that reside in existing packs, we try to avoid recomputing futile delta between an object (trg) and a candidate for its base object (src) if they are stored in the same packfile, and trg is not recorded as a delta already. This heuristics makes sense because it is likely that we tried to express trg as a delta based on src but it did not produce a good delta when we created the existing pack. As the pack heuristics prefer producing delta to remove data, and Linus's law dictates that the size of a file grows over time, we tend to record the newest version of the file as inflated, and older ones as delta against it. When creating a thin-pack to transfer recent history, it is likely that we will try to send an object that is recorded in full, as it is newer. But the heuristics to avoid recomputing futile delta effectively forbids us from attempting to express such an object as a delta based on another object. Sending an object in full is often more expensive than sending a suboptimal delta based on other objects, and it is even more so if we could use an object we know the receiving end already has (i.e. preferred base object) as the delta base. Tweak the recomputation avoidance logic, so that we do not punt on computing delta against a preferred base object. The effect of this change can be seen on two simulated upload-pack workloads. The first is based on 44 reflog entries from my git.git origin/master reflog, and represents the packs that kernel.org sent me git updates for the past month or two. The second workload represents much larger fetches, going from git's v1.0.0 tag to v1.1.0, then v1.1.0 to v1.2.0, and so on. The table below shows the average generated pack size and the average CPU time consumed for each dataset, both before and after the patch: dataset | reflog | tags --------------------------------- before | 53358 | 2750977 size after | 32398 | 2668479 change | -39% | -3% --------------------------------- before | 0.18 | 1.12 CPU after | 0.18 | 1.15 change | +0% | +3% This patch makes a much bigger difference for packs with a shorter slice of history (since its effect is seen at the boundaries of the pack) though it has some benefit even for larger packs. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jv/maint-config-set' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* jv/maint-config-set: Fix an incorrect reference to --set-all.
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jc/checkout-m-twoway' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-24/+36
* jc/checkout-m-twoway: t/t2023-checkout-m.sh: fix use of test_must_fail checkout_merged(): squelch false warning from some gcc Test 'checkout -m -- path' checkout -m: no need to insist on having all 3 stages
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jk/maint-strbuf-missing-init' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+2
* jk/maint-strbuf-missing-init: commit, merge: initialize static strbuf
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jn/maint-sequencer-fixes' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-48/+92
* jn/maint-sequencer-fixes: revert: stop creating and removing sequencer-old directory Revert "reset: Make reset remove the sequencer state" revert: do not remove state until sequence is finished revert: allow single-pick in the middle of cherry-pick sequence revert: pass around rev-list args in already-parsed form revert: allow cherry-pick --continue to commit before resuming revert: give --continue handling its own function
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jk/maint-mv' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
* jk/maint-mv: mv: be quiet about overwriting mv: improve overwrite warning mv: make non-directory destination error more clear mv: honor --verbose flag docs: mention "-k" for both forms of "git mv"
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jk/fetch-no-tail-match-refs' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-7/+11
* jk/fetch-no-tail-match-refs: connect.c: drop path_match function fetch-pack: match refs exactly t5500: give fully-qualified refs to fetch-pack drop "match" parameter from get_remote_heads
2011-12-28Merge branch 'ci/stripspace-docs' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* ci/stripspace-docs: Update documentation for stripspace
2011-12-28Merge branch 'jn/branch-move-to-self' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-6/+20
* jn/branch-move-to-self: Allow checkout -B <current-branch> to update the current branch branch: allow a no-op "branch -M <current-branch> HEAD"
2011-12-27Fix an incorrect reference to --set-all.Libravatar Jelmer Vernooij1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-21Merge branch 'bc/maint-apply-check-no-patch' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
* bc/maint-apply-check-no-patch: builtin/apply.c: report error on failure to recognize input t/t4131-apply-fake-ancestor.sh: fix broken test
2011-12-21clone: the -o option has nothing to do with <branch>Libravatar Carlos Martín Nieto1-2/+2
It is to give an alternate <name> instead of "origin" to the remote we are cloning from. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-21builtin/log: remove redundant initializationLibravatar Michael Schubert1-2/+0
"abbrev" and "commit_format" in struct rev_info get initialized in init_revisions - no need to reinit in cmd_log_init_defaults. Signed-off-by: Michael Schubert <mschub@elegosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-21Merge branch 'ms/commit-cc-option-helpstring' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* ms/commit-cc-option-helpstring: builtin/commit: add missing '/' in help message
2011-12-20builtin/init-db.c: eliminate -Wformat warning on SolarisLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
On Solaris systems we'd warn about an implicit cast of mode_t when we printed things out with the %d format. We'd get this warning under GCC 4.6.0 with Solaris headers: builtin/init-db.c: In function ‘separate_git_dir’: builtin/init-db.c:354:4: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 2 has type ‘mode_t’ [-Wformat] We've been doing this ever since v1.7.4.1-296-gb57fb80. Just work around this by adding an explicit cast. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-18Update jk/maint-strbuf-missing-init to builtin/ renameLibravatar Junio C Hamano89-0/+42160
2011-12-15checkout_merged(): squelch false warning from some gccLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
gcc 4.6.2 (there may be others) does not realize that the variable "mode" can never be used uninitialized in this function and issues a false warning under -Wuninitialized option. Squelch it with an unnecessary initialization; it is not like a single assignment matters to the performance in this codepath that writes out to the filesystem with checkout_entry() anyway. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-13Merge branch 'jc/maint-pack-object-cycle' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+43
* jc/maint-pack-object-cycle: pack-object: tolerate broken packs that have duplicated objects Conflicts: builtin/pack-objects.c
2011-12-13Merge branch 'jc/index-pack-reject-dups' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
* jc/index-pack-reject-dups: receive-pack, fetch-pack: reject bogus pack that records objects twice
2011-12-13Merge branch 'nd/misc-cleanups' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-6/+7
* nd/misc-cleanups: unpack_object_header_buffer(): clear the size field upon error tree_entry_interesting: make use of local pointer "item" tree_entry_interesting(): give meaningful names to return values read_directory_recursive: reduce one indentation level get_tree_entry(): do not call find_tree_entry() on an empty tree tree-walk.c: do not leak internal structure in tree_entry_len()
2011-12-13Merge branch 'maint-1.7.7' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano6-45/+53
* maint-1.7.7: Git 1.7.7.5 Git 1.7.6.5 blame: don't overflow time buffer fetch: create status table using strbuf checkout,merge: loosen overwriting untracked file check based on info/exclude cast variable in call to free() in builtin/diff.c and submodule.c apply: get rid of useless x < 0 comparison on a size_t type Conflicts: Documentation/git.txt GIT-VERSION-GEN RelNotes builtin/fetch.c
2011-12-13Merge branch 'ab/clang-lints' into maint-1.7.7Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-4/+1
* ab/clang-lints: cast variable in call to free() in builtin/diff.c and submodule.c apply: get rid of useless x < 0 comparison on a size_t type
2011-12-13Merge branch 'nd/maint-ignore-exclude' into maint-1.7.7Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+2
* nd/maint-ignore-exclude: checkout,merge: loosen overwriting untracked file check based on info/exclude
2011-12-13Merge branch 'maint-1.7.6' into maint-1.7.7Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-39/+50
* maint-1.7.6: Git 1.7.6.5 blame: don't overflow time buffer fetch: create status table using strbuf Conflicts: Documentation/git.txt GIT-VERSION-GEN RelNotes
2011-12-13Merge branch 'jk/maint-fetch-status-table' into maint-1.7.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-38/+49
* jk/maint-fetch-status-table: fetch: create status table using strbuf
2011-12-13Merge branch 'jc/maint-name-rev-all' into maint-1.7.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* jc/maint-name-rev-all: name-rev --all: do not even attempt to describe non-commit object
2011-12-13blame: don't overflow time bufferLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When showing the raw timestamp, we format the numeric seconds-since-epoch into a buffer, followed by the timezone string. This string has come straight from the commit object. A well-formed object should have a timezone string of only a few bytes, but we could be operating on data pushed by a malicious user. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-13fetch-pack: match refs exactlyLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+9
When we are determining the list of refs to fetch via fetch-pack, we have two sets of refs to compare: those on the remote side, and a "match" list of things we want to fetch. We iterate through the remote refs alphabetically, seeing if each one is wanted by the "match" list. Since def88e9 (Commit first cut at "git-fetch-pack", 2005-07-04), we have used the "path_match" function to do a suffix match, where a remote ref is considered wanted if any of the "match" elements is a suffix of the remote refname. This enables callers of fetch-pack to specify unqualified refs and have them matched up with remote refs (e.g., ask for "A" and get remote's "refs/heads/A"). However, if you provide a fully qualified ref, then there are corner cases where we provide the wrong answer. For example, given a remote with two refs: refs/foo/refs/heads/master refs/heads/master asking for "refs/heads/master" will first match "refs/foo/refs/heads/master" by the suffix rule, and we will erroneously fetch it instead of refs/heads/master. As it turns out, all callers of fetch_pack do provide fully-qualified refs for the match list. There are two ways fetch_pack can get match lists: 1. Through the transport code (i.e., via git-fetch) 2. On the command-line of git-fetch-pack In the first case, we will always be providing the names of fully-qualified refs from "struct ref" objects. We will have pre-matched those ref objects already (since we have to handle more advanced matching, like wildcard refspecs), and are just providing a list of the refs whose objects we need. In the second case, users could in theory be providing non-qualified refs on the command-line. However, the fetch-pack documentation claims that refs should be fully qualified (and has always done so since it was written in 2005). Let's change this path_match call to simply check for string equality, matching what the callers of fetch_pack are expecting. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-13drop "match" parameter from get_remote_headsLibravatar Jeff King2-3/+2
The get_remote_heads function reads the list of remote refs during git protocol session. It dates all the way back to def88e9 (Commit first cut at "git-fetch-pack", 2005-07-04). At that time, the idea was to come up with a list of refs we were interested in, and then filter the list as we got it from the remote side. Later, 1baaae5 (Make maximal use of the remote refs, 2005-10-28) stopped filtering at the get_remote_heads layer, letting us use the non-matching refs to find common history. As a result, all callers now simply pass an empty match list (and any future callers will want to do the same). So let's drop these now-useless parameters. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12Update documentation for stripspaceLibravatar Conrad Irwin1-1/+1
Tell the user what this command is intended for, and expand the description of what it does. Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12mv: be quiet about overwritingLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+2
When a user asks us to force a mv and overwrite the destination, we print a warning. However, since a typical use would be: $ git mv one two fatal: destination exists, source=one, destination=two $ git mv -f one two warning: overwriting 'two' this warning is just noise. We already know we're overwriting; that's why we gave -f! This patch silences the warning unless "--verbose" is given. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12mv: improve overwrite warningLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we try to "git mv" over an existing file, the error message is fairly informative: $ git mv one two fatal: destination exists, source=one, destination=two When the user forces the overwrite, we give a warning: $ git mv -f one two warning: destination exists; will overwrite! This is less informative, but still sufficient in the simple rename case, as there is only one rename happening. But when moving files from one directory to another, it becomes useless: $ mkdir three $ touch one two three/one $ git add . $ git mv one two three fatal: destination exists, source=one, destination=three/one $ git mv -f one two three warning: destination exists; will overwrite! The first message is helpful, but the second one gives us no clue about what was overwritten. Let's mention the name of the destination file: $ git mv -f one two three warning: overwriting 'three/one' Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12revert: stop creating and removing sequencer-old directoryLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+3
Now that "git reset" no longer implicitly removes .git/sequencer that the operator may or may not have wanted to keep, the logic to write a backup copy of .git/sequencer and remove it when stale is not needed any more. Simplify the sequencer API and repository layout by dropping it. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12revert: do not remove state until sequence is finishedLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-11/+1
As v1.7.8-rc0~141^2~4 (2011-08-04) explains, git cherry-pick removes the sequencer state just before applying the final patch. In the single-pick case, that was a good thing, since --abort and --continue work fine without access to such state and removing it provides a signal that git should not complain about the need to clobber it ("a cherry-pick or revert is already in progress") in sequences like the following: git cherry-pick foo git read-tree -m -u HEAD; # forget that; let's try a different one git cherry-pick bar After the recent patch "allow single-pick in the middle of cherry-pick sequence" we don't need that hack any more. In the new regime, a traditional "git cherry-pick <commit>" command never looks at .git/sequencer, so we do not need to cripple "git cherry-pick <commit>..<commit>" for it any more. So now you can run "git cherry-pick --abort" near the end of a multi-pick sequence and it will abort the entire sequence, instead of misbehaving and aborting just the final commit. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12revert: allow single-pick in the middle of cherry-pick sequenceLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+26
After messing up a difficult conflict resolution in the middle of a cherry-pick sequence, it can be useful to be able to git checkout HEAD . && git cherry-pick that-one-commit to restart the conflict resolution. The current code however errors out saying that another cherry-pick is already in progress. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12revert: pass around rev-list args in already-parsed formLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-24/+29
Since 7e2bfd3f (revert: allow cherry-picking more than one commit, 2010-07-02), the pick/revert machinery has kept track of the set of commits to be cherry-picked or reverted using commit_argc and commit_argv variables, storing the corresponding command-line parameters. Future callers as other commands are built in (am, rebase, sequencer) may find it easier to pass rev-list options to this machinery in already-parsed form. Teach cmd_cherry_pick and cmd_revert to parse the rev-list arguments in advance and pass the commit set to pick_revisions() as a rev_info structure. Original patch by Jonathan, tweaks and test from Ram. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Improved-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12revert: allow cherry-pick --continue to commit before resumingLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-3/+20
When "git cherry-pick ..bar" encounters conflicts, permit the operator to use cherry-pick --continue after resolving them as a shortcut for "git commit && git cherry-pick --continue" to record the resolution and carry on with the rest of the sequence. This improves the analogy with "git rebase" (in olden days --continue was the way to preserve authorship when a rebase encountered conflicts) and fits well with a general UI goal of making "git cmd --continue" save humans the trouble of deciding what to do next. Example: after encountering a conflict from running "git cherry-pick foo bar baz": CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in main.c error: could not apply f78a8d98c... bar! hint: after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths hint: with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>' hint: and commit the result with 'git commit' We edit main.c to resolve the conflict, mark it acceptable with "git add main.c", and can run "cherry-pick --continue" to resume the sequence. $ git cherry-pick --continue [editor opens to confirm commit message] [master 78c8a8c98] bar! 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [master 87ca8798c] baz! 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) This is done for both codepaths to pick multiple commits and a single commit. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12revert: give --continue handling its own functionLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-11/+17
This makes pick_revisions() a little shorter and easier to read straight through. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12mv: make non-directory destination error more clearLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
If you try to "git mv" multiple files onto another non-directory file, you confusingly get the "usage" message: $ touch one two three $ git add . $ git mv one two three usage: git mv [options] <source>... <destination> [...] From the user's perspective, that makes no sense. They just gave parameters that exactly match that usage! This behavior dates back to the original C version of "git mv", which had a usage message like: usage: git mv (<source> <destination> | <source>... <destination>) This was slightly less confusing, because it at least mentions that there are two ways to invoke (but it still isn't clear why what the user provided doesn't work). Instead, let's show an error message like: $ git mv one two three fatal: destination 'three' is not a directory We could leave the usage message in place, too, but it doesn't actually help here. It contains no hints that there are two forms, nor that multi-file form requires that the endpoint be a directory. So it just becomes useless noise that distracts from the real error. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-12mv: honor --verbose flagLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+1
The code for a verbose flag has been here since "git mv" was converted to C many years ago, but actually getting the "-v" flag from the command line was accidentally lost in the transition. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-09fetch: create status table using strbufLibravatar Jeff King1-38/+49
When we fetch from a remote, we print a status table like: From url * [new branch] foo -> origin/foo We create this table in a static buffer using sprintf. If the remote refnames are long, they can overflow this buffer and smash the stack. Instead, let's use a strbuf to build the string. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-06checkout -m: no need to insist on having all 3 stagesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-24/+36
The content level merge machinery ll_merge() is prepared to merge correctly in "both sides added differently" case by using an empty blob as if it were the common ancestor. "checkout -m" could do the same, but didn't bother supporting it and instead insisted on having all three stages. Reported-by: Pete Harlan Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-05Merge branch 'maint-1.7.7' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
* maint-1.7.7: stripspace: fix outdated comment Add MYMETA.yml to perl/.gitignore
2011-12-05Merge branch 'maint-1.7.6' into maint-1.7.7Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
* maint-1.7.6: stripspace: fix outdated comment Add MYMETA.yml to perl/.gitignore
2011-12-05stripspace: fix outdated commentLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+0
The comment on top of stripspace() claims that the buffer will no longer be NUL-terminated. However, this has not been the case at least since the move to using strbuf in 2007. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-05builtin/apply.c: report error on failure to recognize inputLibravatar Brandon Casey1-5/+5
When git apply is passed something that is not a patch, it does not produce an error message or exit with a non-zero status if it was not actually "applying" the patch i.e. --check or --numstat etc were supplied on the command line. Fix this by producing an error when apply fails to find any hunks whatsoever while parsing the patch. This will cause some of the output formats (--numstat, --diffstat, etc) to produce an error when they formerly would have reported zero changes and exited successfully. That seems like the correct behavior though. Failure to recognize the input as a patch should be an error. Plus, add a test. Reported-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-28Allow checkout -B <current-branch> to update the current branchLibravatar Jonathan Nieder2-5/+12
When on master, "git checkout -B master <commit>" is a more natural way to say "git reset --keep <commit>", which was originally invented for the exact purpose of moving to the named commit while keeping the local changes around. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-11-28branch: allow a no-op "branch -M <current-branch> HEAD"Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+8
Overwriting the current branch with a different commit is forbidden, as it will make the status recorded in the index and the working tree out of sync with respect to the HEAD. There however is no reason to forbid it if the current branch is renamed to itself, which admittedly is something only an insane user would do, but is handy for scripts. Test script is by Conrad Irwin. Reported-by: Soeren Sonnenburg <sonne@debian.org> Reported-by: Josh Chia (谢任中) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>