summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-10-11Merge branch 'jc/blame-abbrev' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Almost everybody uses DEFAULT_ABBREV to refer to the default setting for the abbreviation, but "git blame" peeked into underlying variable bypassing the macro for no good reason. * jc/blame-abbrev: blame: use DEFAULT_ABBREV macro
2016-10-11Merge branch 'rs/copy-array' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code cleanup. * rs/copy-array: use COPY_ARRAY add COPY_ARRAY
2016-10-03Merge branch 'jk/pack-tag-of-tag' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+30
"git pack-objects --include-tag" was taught that when we know that we are sending an object C, we want a tag B that directly points at C but also a tag A that points at the tag B. We used to miss the intermediate tag B in some cases. * jk/pack-tag-of-tag: pack-objects: walk tag chains for --include-tag t5305: simplify packname handling t5305: use "git -C" t5305: drop "dry-run" of unpack-objects t5305: move cleanup into test block
2016-09-29Merge branch 'tg/add-chmod+x-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano4-36/+33
"git add --chmod=+x <pathspec>" added recently only toggled the executable bit for paths that are either new or modified. This has been corrected to flip the executable bit for all paths that match the given pathspec. * tg/add-chmod+x-fix: t3700-add: do not check working tree file mode without POSIXPERM t3700-add: create subdirectory gently add: modify already added files when --chmod is given read-cache: introduce chmod_index_entry update-index: add test for chmod flags
2016-09-29Merge branch 'nd/checkout-disambiguation' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
"git checkout <word>" does not follow the usual disambiguation rules when the <word> can be both a rev and a path, to allow checking out a branch 'foo' in a project that happens to have a file 'foo' in the working tree without having to disambiguate. This was poorly documented and the check was incorrect when the command was run from a subdirectory. * nd/checkout-disambiguation: checkout: fix ambiguity check in subdir checkout.txt: document a common case that ignores ambiguation rules checkout: add some spaces between code and comment
2016-09-29Merge branch 'jk/reduce-gc-aggressive-depth' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git gc --aggressive" used to limit the delta-chain length to 250, which is way too deep for gaining additional space savings and is detrimental for runtime performance. The limit has been reduced to 50. * jk/reduce-gc-aggressive-depth: gc: default aggressive depth to 50
2016-09-29Merge branch 'jt/format-patch-base-info-above-sig' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
"git format-patch --base=..." feature that was recently added showed the base commit information after "-- " e-mail signature line, which turned out to be inconvenient. The base information has been moved above the signature line. * jt/format-patch-base-info-above-sig: format-patch: show base info before email signature
2016-09-29Merge branch 'rs/checkout-some-states-are-const' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Code cleanup. * rs/checkout-some-states-are-const: checkout: constify parameters of checkout_stage() and checkout_merged()
2016-09-28blame: use DEFAULT_ABBREV macroLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This does not make any practical difference in today's code, but everybody else accesses the default abbreviation length via the DEFAULT_ABBREV macro. Make sure this oddball codepath does not stray from the convention. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-25use COPY_ARRAYLibravatar René Scharfe1-1/+1
Add a semantic patch for converting certain calls of memcpy(3) to COPY_ARRAY() and apply that transformation to the code base. The result is shorter and safer code. For now only consider calls where source and destination have the same type, or in other words: easy cases. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-21checkout: fix ambiguity check in subdirLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-2/+2
The two functions in parse_branchname_arg(), verify_non_filename and check_filename, need correct prefix in order to reconstruct the paths and check for their existence. With NULL prefix, they just check paths at top dir instead. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-19Merge branch 'ah/misc-message-fixes' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+2
Message cleanup. * ah/misc-message-fixes: unpack-trees: do not capitalize "working" git-merge-octopus: do not capitalize "octopus" git-rebase--interactive: fix English grammar cat-file: put spaces around pipes in usage string am: put spaces around pipe in usage string
2016-09-19Merge branch 'jc/forbid-symbolic-ref-d-HEAD' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
"git symbolic-ref -d HEAD" happily removes the symbolic ref, but the resulting repository becomes an invalid one. Teach the command to forbid removal of HEAD. * jc/forbid-symbolic-ref-d-HEAD: symbolic-ref -d: do not allow removal of HEAD
2016-09-15add: modify already added files when --chmod is givenLibravatar Thomas Gummerer3-21/+30
When the chmod option was added to git add, it was hooked up to the diff machinery, meaning that it only works when the version in the index differs from the version on disk. As the option was supposed to mirror the chmod option in update-index, which always changes the mode in the index, regardless of the status of the file, make sure the option behaves the same way in git add. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-15read-cache: introduce chmod_index_entryLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-14/+2
As there are chmod options for both add and update-index, introduce a new chmod_index_entry function to do the work. Use it in update-index, while it will be used in add in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-15format-patch: show base info before email signatureLibravatar Josh Triplett1-3/+3
Any text below the "-- " for the email signature gets treated as part of the signature, and many mail clients will trim it from the quoted text for a reply. Move it above the signature, so people can reply to it more easily. Similarly, when producing the patch as a MIME attachment, the original code placed the base info after the attached part, which would be discarded. Move the base info to the end of the part, still inside the part boundary. Add tests for the exact format of the email signature, and add tests to ensure that the base info appears before the email signature when producing a plain-text output, and that it appears before the part boundary when producing a MIME attachment. Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-14update-index: add test for chmod flagsLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-1/+1
Currently there is no test checking the expected behaviour when multiple chmod flags with different arguments are passed. As argument handling is not in line with other git commands it's easy to miss and accidentally change the current behaviour. While there, fix the argument type of chmod_path, which takes an int, but had a char passed in. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-13checkout: constify parameters of checkout_stage() and checkout_merged()Libravatar René Scharfe1-3/+3
Document the fact that checkout_stage() and checkout_merged() don't change the objects passed to them by adding the modifier const. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-08checkout: add some spaces between code and commentLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-08cat-file: put spaces around pipes in usage stringLibravatar Alex Henrie1-1/+1
This makes the style a little more consistent with other usage strings, and will resolve a warning at https://www.softcatala.org/recursos/quality/git.html Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-08am: put spaces around pipe in usage stringLibravatar Alex Henrie1-1/+1
This makes the style a little more consistent with other usage strings, and will resolve a warning at https://www.softcatala.org/recursos/quality/git.html Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-07pack-objects: walk tag chains for --include-tagLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+30
When pack-objects is given --include-tag, it peels each tag ref down to a non-tag object, and if that non-tag object is going to be packed, we include the tag, too. But what happens if we have a chain of tags (e.g., tag "A" points to tag "B", which points to commit "C")? We'll peel down to "C" and realize that we want to include tag "A", but we do not ever consider tag "B", leading to a broken pack (assuming "B" was not otherwise selected). Instead, we have to walk the whole chain, adding any tags we find to the pack. Interestingly, it doesn't seem possible to trigger this problem with "git fetch", but you can with "git clone --single-branch". The reason is that we generate the correct pack when the client explicitly asks for "A" (because we do a real reachability analysis there), and "fetch" is more willing to do so. There are basically two cases: 1. If "C" is already a ref tip, then the client can deduce that it needs "A" itself (via find_non_local_tags), and will ask for it explicitly rather than relying on the include-tag capability. Everything works. 2. If "C" is not already a ref tip, then we hope for include-tag to send us the correct tag. But it doesn't; it generates a broken pack. However, the next step is to do a follow-up run of find_non_local_tags(), followed by fetch_refs() to backfill any tags we learned about. In the normal case, fetch_refs() calls quickfetch(), which does a connectivity check and sees we have no new objects to fetch. We just write the refs. But for the broken-pack case, the connectivity check fails, and quickfetch will follow-up with the remote, asking explicitly for each of the ref tips. This picks up the missing object in a new pack. For a regular "git clone", we are similarly OK, because we explicitly request all of the tag refs, and get a correct pack. But with "--single-branch", we kick in tag auto-following via "include-tag", but do _not_ do a follow-up backfill. We just take whatever the server sent us via include-tag and write out tag refs for any tag objects we were sent. So prior to c6807a4 (clone: open a shortcut for connectivity check, 2013-05-26), we actually claimed the clone was a success, but the result was silently corrupted! Since c6807a4, index-pack's connectivity check catches this case, and we correctly complain. The included test directly checks that pack-objects does not generate a broken pack, but also confirms that "clone --single-branch" does not hit the bug. Note that tag chains introduce another interesting question: if we are packing the tag "B" but not the commit "C", should "A" be included? Both before and after this patch, we do not include "A", because the initial peel_ref() check only knows about the bottom-most level, "C". To realize that "B" is involved at all, we would have to switch to an incremental peel, in which we examine each tagged object, asking if it is being packed (and including the outer tag if so). But that runs contrary to the optimizations in peel_ref(), which avoid accessing the objects at all, in favor of using the value we pull from packed-refs. It's OK to walk the whole chain once we know we're going to include the tag (we have to access it anyway, so the effort is proportional to the pack we're generating). But for the initial selection, we have to look at every ref. If we're only packing a few objects, we'd still have to parse every single referenced tag object just to confirm that it isn't part of a tag chain. This could be addressed if packed-refs stored the complete tag chain for each peeled ref (in most cases, this would be the same cost as now, as each "chain" is only a single link). But given the size of that project, it's out of scope for this fix (and probably nobody cares enough anyway, as it's such an obscure situation). This commit limits itself to just avoiding the creation of a broken pack. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-02symbolic-ref -d: do not allow removal of HEADLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
If you delete the symbolic-ref HEAD from a repository, Git no longer considers the repository valid, and even "git symbolic-ref HEAD refs/heads/master" would not be able to recover from that state (although "git init" can, but that is a sure sign that you are talking about a "broken" repository). In the spirit similar to afe5d3d5 ("symbolic ref: refuse non-ref targets in HEAD", 2009-01-29), forbid removal of HEAD to avoid corrupting a repository. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-31Merge branch 'mh/blame-worktree'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* mh/blame-worktree: blame: fix segfault on untracked files
2016-08-29blame: fix segfault on untracked filesLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-1/+2
Since 3b75ee9 ("blame: allow to blame paths freshly added to the index", 2016-07-16) git blame also looks at the index to determine if there is a file that was freshly added to the index. cache_name_pos returns -pos - 1 in case there is no match is found, or if the name matches, but the entry has a stage other than 0. As git blame should work for unmerged files, it uses strcmp to determine whether the name of the returned position matches, in which case the file exists, but is merely unmerged, or if the file actually doesn't exist in the index. If the repository is empty, or if the file would lexicographically be sorted as the last file in the repository, -cache_name_pos - 1 is outside of the length of the active_cache array, causing git blame to segfault. Guard against that, and die() normally to restore the old behaviour. Reported-by: Simon Ruderich <simon@ruderich.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-25Merge branch 'js/no-html-bypass-on-windows'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+0
On Windows, help.browser configuration variable used to be ignored, which has been corrected. * js/no-html-bypass-on-windows: Revert "display HTML in default browser using Windows' shell API"
2016-08-19Merge branch 'sb/checkout-explit-detach-no-advice'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
"git checkout --detach <branch>" used to give the same advice message as that is issued when "git checkout <tag>" (or anything that is not a branch name) is given, but asking with "--detach" is an explicit enough sign that the user knows what is going on. The advice message has been squelched in this case. * sb/checkout-explit-detach-no-advice: checkout: do not mention detach advice for explicit --detach option
2016-08-19Revert "display HTML in default browser using Windows' shell API"Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-7/+0
Since 4804aab (help (Windows): Display HTML in default browser using Windows' shell API, 2008-07-13), Git for Windows used to call `ShellExecute()` to launch the default Windows handler for `.html` files. The idea was to avoid going through a shell script, for performance reasons. However, this change ignores the `help.browser` config setting. Together with browsing help not being a performance-critical operation, let's just revert that patch. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-17Merge branch 'jk/tighten-alloc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+1
Small code and comment clean-up. * jk/tighten-alloc: receive-pack: use FLEX_ALLOC_MEM in queue_command() correct FLEXPTR_* example in comment
2016-08-15checkout: do not mention detach advice for explicit --detach optionLibravatar Stefan Beller1-1/+2
When a user asked for a detached HEAD specifically with `--detach`, we do not need to give advice on what a detached HEAD state entails as we can assume they know what they're getting into as they asked for it. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-13receive-pack: use FLEX_ALLOC_MEM in queue_command()Libravatar René Scharfe1-3/+1
Use the macro FLEX_ALLOC_MEM instead of open-coding it. This shortens and simplifies the code a bit. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-12Merge branch 'kw/patch-ids-optim'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
When "git rebase" tries to compare set of changes on the updated upstream and our own branch, it computes patch-id for all of these changes and attempts to find matches. This has been optimized by lazily computing the full patch-id (which is expensive) to be compared only for changes that touch the same set of paths. * kw/patch-ids-optim: rebase: avoid computing unnecessary patch IDs patch-ids: add flag to create the diff patch id using header only data patch-ids: replace the seen indicator with a commit pointer patch-ids: stop using a hand-rolled hashmap implementation
2016-08-12Merge branch 'js/mv-dir-to-new-directory'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+7
"git mv dir non-existing-dir/" did not work in some environments the same way as existing mainstream platforms. The code now moves "dir" to "non-existing-dir", without relying on rename("A", "B/") that strips the trailing slash of '/'. * js/mv-dir-to-new-directory: git mv: do not keep slash in `git mv dir non-existing-dir/`
2016-08-12Merge branch 'rs/use-strbuf-add-unique-abbrev'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
A small code clean-up. * rs/use-strbuf-add-unique-abbrev: use strbuf_add_unique_abbrev() for adding short hashes
2016-08-12Merge branch 'rs/merge-add-strategies-simplification'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-34/+10
A small code clean-up. * rs/merge-add-strategies-simplification: merge: use string_list_split() in add_strategies()
2016-08-12Merge branch 'rs/child-process-init'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-6/+3
A small code clean-up. * rs/child-process-init: use CHILD_PROCESS_INIT to initialize automatic variables
2016-08-12Merge branch 'sb/submodule-clone-retry'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+6
Fix-up to an error codepath in a topic already in 'master'. * sb/submodule-clone-retry: submodule--helper: use parallel processor correctly
2016-08-12Merge branch 'jk/reset-ident-time-per-commit' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
Not-so-recent rewrite of "git am" that started making internal calls into the commit machinery had an unintended regression, in that no matter how many seconds it took to apply many patches, the resulting committer timestamp for the resulting commits were all the same. * jk/reset-ident-time-per-commit: am: reset cached ident date for each patch
2016-08-11rebase: avoid computing unnecessary patch IDsLibravatar Kevin Willford1-1/+1
The `rebase` family of Git commands avoid applying patches that were already integrated upstream. They do that by using the revision walking option that computes the patch IDs of the two sides of the rebase (local-only patches vs upstream-only ones) and skipping those local patches whose patch ID matches one of the upstream ones. In many cases, this causes unnecessary churn, as already the set of paths touched by a given commit would suffice to determine that an upstream patch has no local equivalent. This hurts performance in particular when there are a lot of upstream patches, and/or large ones. Therefore, let's introduce the concept of a "diff-header-only" patch ID, compare those first, and only evaluate the "full" patch ID lazily. Please note that in contrast to the "full" patch IDs, those "diff-header-only" patch IDs are prone to collide with one another, as adjacent commits frequently touch the very same files. Hence we now have to be careful to allow multiple hash entries with the same hash. We accomplish that by using the hashmap_add() function that does not even test for hash collisions. This also allows us to evaluate the full patch ID lazily, i.e. only when we found commits with matching diff-header-only patch IDs. We add a performance test that demonstrates ~1-6% improvement. In practice this will depend on various factors such as how many upstream changes and how big those changes are along with whether file system caches are cold or warm. As Git's test suite has no way of catching performance regressions, we also add a regression test that verifies that the full patch ID computation is skipped when the diff-header-only computation suffices. Signed-off-by: Kevin Willford <kcwillford@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-11gc: default aggressive depth to 50Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
This commit message is long and has lots of background and numbers. The summary is: the current default of 250 doesn't save much space, and costs CPU. It's not a good tradeoff. Read on for details. The "--aggressive" flag to git-gc does three things: 1. use "-f" to throw out existing deltas and recompute from scratch 2. use "--window=250" to look harder for deltas 3. use "--depth=250" to make longer delta chains Items (1) and (2) are good matches for an "aggressive" repack. They ask the repack to do more computation work in the hopes of getting a better pack. You pay the costs during the repack, and other operations see only the benefit. Item (3) is not so clear. Allowing longer chains means fewer restrictions on the deltas, which means potentially finding better ones and saving some space. But it also means that operations which access the deltas have to follow longer chains, which affects their performance. So it's a tradeoff, and it's not clear that the tradeoff is even a good one. The existing "250" numbers for "--aggressive" come originally from this thread: http://public-inbox.org/git/alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712060803430.13796@woody.linux-foundation.org/ where Linus says: So when I said "--depth=250 --window=250", I chose those numbers more as an example of extremely aggressive packing, and I'm not at all sure that the end result is necessarily wonderfully usable. It's going to save disk space (and network bandwidth - the delta's will be re-used for the network protocol too!), but there are definitely downsides too, and using long delta chains may simply not be worth it in practice. There are some numbers in that thread, but they're mostly focused on the improved window size, and measure the improvement from --depth=250 and --window=250 together. E.g.: http://public-inbox.org/git/9e4733910712062006l651571f3w7f76ce64c6650dff@mail.gmail.com/ talks about the improved run-time of "git-blame", which comes from the reduced pack size. But most of that reduction is coming from --window=250, whereas most of the extra costs come from --depth=250. There's a link in that thread showing that increasing the depth beyond 50 doesn't seem to help much with the size: https://vcscompare.blogspot.com/2008/06/git-repack-parameters.html but again, no discussion of the timing impact. In an earlier thread from Ted Ts'o which discussed setting the non-aggressive default (from 10 to 50): http://public-inbox.org/git/20070509134958.GA21489%40thunk.org/ we have more numbers, with the conclusion that going past 50 does not help size much, and hurts the speed of normal operations. So from that, we might guess that 50 is actually a sweet spot, even for aggressive, if we interpret aggressive to "spend time now to make a better pack". It is not clear that "--depth=250" is actually a better pack. It may be slightly _smaller_, but it carries a run-time penalty. Here are some more recent timings I did to verify that. They show three things: - the size of the resulting pack (so disk saved to store, bandwidth saved on clones/fetches) - the cost of "rev-list --objects --all", which shows the effect of the delta chains on trees (commits typically don't delta, and the command doesn't touch the blobs at all) - the cost of "log -Sfoo", which will additionally access each blob All cases were repacked with "git repack -adf --depth=$d --window=250" (so basically, what would happen if we tweaked the "gc --aggressive" default depth). The timings are all wall-clock best-of-3. The machine itself has plenty of RAM compared to the repositories (which is probably typical of most workstations these days), so we're really measuring CPU usage, as the whole thing will be in disk cache after the first run. The core.deltaBaseCacheLimit is at its default of 96MiB. It's possible that tweaking it would have some impact on the tests, as some of them (especially "log -S" on a large repo) are likely to overflow that. But bumping that carries a run-time memory cost, so for these tests, I focused on what we could do just with the on-disk pack tradeoffs. Each test is done for four depths: 250 (the current value), 50 (the current default that tested well previously), 100 (to show something on the larger side, which previous tests showed was not a good tradeoff), and 10 (the very old default, which previous tests showed was worse than 50). Here are the numbers for linux.git: depth | size | % | rev-list | % | log -Sfoo | % -------+-------+-------+----------+--------+-----------+------- 250 | 967MB | n/a | 48.159s | n/a | 378.088 | n/a 100 | 971MB | +0.4% | 41.471s | -13.9% | 342.060 | -9.5% 50 | 979MB | +1.2% | 37.778s | -21.6% | 311.040s | -17.7% 10 | 1.1GB | +6.6% | 32.518s | -32.5% | 279.890s | -25.9% and for git.git: depth | size | % | rev-list | % | log -Sfoo | % -------+-------+-------+----------+--------+-----------+------- 250 | 48MB | n/a | 2.215s | n/a | 20.922s | n/a 100 | 49MB | +0.5% | 2.140s | -3.4% | 17.736s | -15.2% 50 | 49MB | +1.7% | 2.099s | -5.2% | 15.418s | -26.3% 10 | 53MB | +9.3% | 2.001s | -9.7% | 12.677s | -39.4% You can see that that the CPU savings for regular operations improves as we decrease the depth. The savings are less for "rev-list" on a smaller repository than they are for blob-accessing operations, or even rev-list on a larger repository. This may mean that a larger delta cache would help (though setting core.deltaBaseCacheLimit by itself doesn't). But we can also see that the space savings are not that great as the depth goes higher. Saving 5-10% between 10 and 50 is probably worth the CPU tradeoff. Saving 1% to go from 50 to 100, or another 0.5% to go from 100 to 250 is probably not. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-10Merge branch 'sb/submodule-update-dot-branch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+54
A few updates to "git submodule update". Use of "| wc -l" break with BSD variant of 'wc'. * sb/submodule-update-dot-branch: t7406: fix breakage on OSX submodule update: allow '.' for branch value submodule--helper: add remote-branch helper submodule-config: keep configured branch around submodule--helper: fix usage string for relative-path submodule update: narrow scope of local variable submodule update: respect depth in subsequent fetches t7406: future proof tests with hard coded depth
2016-08-10Merge branch 'js/am-3-merge-recursive-direct'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-43/+31
"git am -3" calls "git merge-recursive" when it needs to fall back to a three-way merge; this call has been turned into an internal subroutine call instead of spawning a separate subprocess. * js/am-3-merge-recursive-direct: merge-recursive: flush output buffer even when erroring out merge_trees(): ensure that the callers release output buffer merge-recursive: offer an option to retain the output in 'obuf' merge-recursive: write the commit title in one go merge-recursive: flush output buffer before printing error messages am -3: use merge_recursive() directly again merge-recursive: switch to returning errors instead of dying merge-recursive: handle return values indicating errors merge-recursive: allow write_tree_from_memory() to error out merge-recursive: avoid returning a wholesale struct merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors prepare the builtins for a libified merge_recursive() merge-recursive: clarify code in was_tracked() die(_("BUG")): avoid translating bug messages die("bug"): report bugs consistently t5520: verify that `pull --rebase` shows the helpful advice when failing
2016-08-10Merge branch 'js/commit-slab-decl-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+0
* js/commit-slab-decl-fix: commit-slab.h: avoid duplicated global static variables config.c: avoid duplicated global static variables
2016-08-10Merge branch 'jt/format-patch-from-config'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+12
"git format-patch" learned format.from configuration variable to specify the default settings for its "--from" option. * jt/format-patch-from-config: format-patch: format.from gives the default for --from
2016-08-10Merge branch 'jk/reset-ident-time-per-commit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
Not-so-recent rewrite of "git am" that started making internal calls into the commit machinery had an unintended regression, in that no matter how many seconds it took to apply many patches, the resulting committer timestamp for the resulting commits were all the same. * jk/reset-ident-time-per-commit: am: reset cached ident date for each patch
2016-08-10Merge branch 'rs/use-strbuf-addstr' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+2
* rs/use-strbuf-addstr: use strbuf_addstr() instead of strbuf_addf() with "%s" use strbuf_addstr() for adding constant strings to a strbuf
2016-08-10Merge branch 'os/no-verify-skips-commit-msg-too' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git commit --help" said "--no-verify" is only about skipping the pre-commit hook, and failed to say that it also skipped the commit-msg hook. * os/no-verify-skips-commit-msg-too: commit: describe that --no-verify skips the commit-msg hook in the help text
2016-08-10Merge branch 'rs/rm-strbuf-optim' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
The use of strbuf in "git rm" to build filename to remove was a bit suboptimal, which has been fixed. * rs/rm-strbuf-optim: rm: reuse strbuf for all remove_dir_recursively() calls
2016-08-10Merge branch 'jk/parse-options-concat' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+4
Users of the parse_options_concat() API function need to allocate extra slots in advance and fill them with OPT_END() when they want to decide the set of supported options dynamically, which makes the code error-prone and hard to read. This has been corrected by tweaking the API to allocate and return a new copy of "struct option" array. * jk/parse-options-concat: parse_options: allocate a new array when concatenating
2016-08-09submodule--helper: use parallel processor correctlyLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+6
When developing another patch series I had a temporary state in which git-clone would segfault, when the call was prepared in prepare_to_clone_next_submodule. This lead to the call failing, i.e. in `update_clone_task_finished` the task was scheduled to be tried again. The second call to prepare_to_clone_next_submodule would return 0, as the segfaulted clone did create the .git file already, such that was not considered to need to be cloned again. I was seeing the "BUG: ce was a submodule before?\n" message, which was the correct behavior at the time as my local code was buggy. When trying to debug this failure, I tried to use printing messages into the strbuf that is passed around, but these messages were never printed as the die(..) doesn't flush the `err` strbuf. When implementing the die() in 665b35ecc (2016-06-09, "submodule--helper: initial clone learns retry logic"), I considered this condition to be a severe condition, which should lead to an immediate abort as we do not trust ourselves any more. However the queued messages in `err` are valuable so let's not toss them out by immediately dying, but a graceful return. Another thing to note: The error message itself was misleading. A return value of 0 doesn't indicate the passed in `ce` is not a submodule any more, but just that we do not consider cloning it any more. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>