summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-07-06Merge branch 'cb/is-descendant-of'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
Code clean-up. * cb/is-descendant-of: commit-reach: avoid is_descendant_of() shim
2020-07-06Merge branch 'es/get-worktrees-unsort'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-10/+30
API cleanup for get_worktrees() * es/get-worktrees-unsort: worktree: drop get_worktrees() unused 'flags' argument worktree: drop get_worktrees() special-purpose sorting option
2020-07-06Merge branch 'ak/commit-graph-to-slab'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+2
A few fields in "struct commit" that do not have to always be present have been moved to commit slabs. * ak/commit-graph-to-slab: commit-graph: minimize commit_graph_data_slab access commit: move members graph_pos, generation to a slab commit-graph: introduce commit_graph_data_slab object: drop parsed_object_pool->commit_count
2020-07-06Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-part-2'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-10/+56
SHA-256 migration work continues. * bc/sha-256-part-2: (44 commits) remote-testgit: adapt for object-format bundle: detect hash algorithm when reading refs t5300: pass --object-format to git index-pack t5704: send object-format capability with SHA-256 t5703: use object-format serve option t5702: offer an object-format capability in the test t/helper: initialize the repository for test-sha1-array remote-curl: avoid truncating refs with ls-remote t1050: pass algorithm to index-pack when outside repo builtin/index-pack: add option to specify hash algorithm remote-curl: detect algorithm for dumb HTTP by size builtin/ls-remote: initialize repository based on fetch t5500: make hash independent serve: advertise object-format capability for protocol v2 connect: parse v2 refs with correct hash algorithm connect: pass full packet reader when parsing v2 refs Documentation/technical: document object-format for protocol v2 t1302: expect repo format version 1 for SHA-256 builtin/show-index: provide options to determine hash algo t5302: modernize test formatting ...
2020-06-29Merge branch 'sk/diff-files-show-i-t-a-as-new'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
"git diff-files" has been taught to say paths that are marked as intent-to-add are new files, not modified from an empty blob. * sk/diff-files-show-i-t-a-as-new: diff-files: treat "i-t-a" files as "not-in-index"
2020-06-29Merge branch 'rs/pull-leakfix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
Leakfix. * rs/pull-leakfix: pull: plug minor memory leak after using is_descendant_of()
2020-06-29Merge branch 'dl/diff-usage-comment-update'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+12
An in-code comment in "git diff" has been updated. * dl/diff-usage-comment-update: builtin/diff: fix botched update of usage comment builtin/diff: update usage comment
2020-06-29Merge branch 'xl/upgrade-repo-format'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-3/+2
Allow runtime upgrade of the repository format version, which needs to be done carefully. There is a rather unpleasant backward compatibility worry with the last step of this series, but it is the right thing to do in the longer term. * xl/upgrade-repo-format: check_repository_format_gently(): refuse extensions for old repositories sparse-checkout: upgrade repository to version 1 when enabling extension fetch: allow adding a filter after initial clone repository: add a helper function to perform repository format upgrade
2020-06-25Merge branch 'jt/cdn-offload'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-6/+87
The "fetch/clone" protocol has been updated to allow the server to instruct the clients to grab pre-packaged packfile(s) in addition to the packed object data coming over the wire. * jt/cdn-offload: upload-pack: fix a sparse '0 as NULL pointer' warning upload-pack: send part of packfile response as uri fetch-pack: support more than one pack lockfile upload-pack: refactor reading of pack-objects out Documentation: add Packfile URIs design doc Documentation: order protocol v2 sections http-fetch: support fetching packfiles by URL http-fetch: refactor into function http: refactor finish_http_pack_request() http: use --stdin when indexing dumb HTTP pack
2020-06-25Merge branch 'ss/submodule-set-branch-in-c'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+44
Rewrite of parts of the scripted "git submodule" Porcelain command continues; this time it is "git submodule set-branch" subcommand's turn. * ss/submodule-set-branch-in-c: submodule: port subcommand 'set-branch' from shell to C
2020-06-25Merge branch 'dl/branch-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code clean-up around "git branch" with a minor bugfix. * dl/branch-cleanup: branch: don't mix --edit-description t3200: test for specific errors t3200: rename "expected" to "expect"
2020-06-25Merge branch 'ct/diff-with-merge-base-clarification'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-14/+118
"git diff" used to take arguments in random and nonsense range notation, e.g. "git diff A..B C", "git diff A..B C...D", etc., which has been cleaned up. * ct/diff-with-merge-base-clarification: Documentation: usage for diff combined commits git diff: improve range handling t/t3430: avoid undefined git diff behavior
2020-06-25Merge branch 'en/clean-cleanups'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+38
Code clean-up of "git clean" resulted in a fix of recent performance regression. * en/clean-cleanups: clean: optimize and document cases where we recurse into subdirectories clean: consolidate handling of ignored parameters dir, clean: avoid disallowed behavior dir: fix a few confusing comments
2020-06-23builtin/diff: fix botched update of usage commentLibravatar Denton Liu1-4/+1
In the previous commit, an attempt was made to correct the "N=1, M=0" case. However, the fix was botched and it introduced two half-correct sections by mistake. Combine these half-correct sections into one fully correct section. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-23commit-reach: avoid is_descendant_of() shimLibravatar Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón1-1/+2
d91d6fbf26 (commit-reach: create repo_is_descendant_of(), 2020-06-17) adds a repository aware version of is_descendant_of() and a backward compatibility shim that is barely used. Update all callers to directly use the new repo_is_descendant_of() function instead; making the codebase simpler and pushing more the_repository references higher up the stack. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-22Merge branch 'es/worktree-duplicate-paths'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-35/+93
The same worktree directory must be registered only once, but "git worktree move" allowed this invariant to be violated, which has been corrected. * es/worktree-duplicate-paths: worktree: make "move" refuse to move atop missing registered worktree worktree: generalize candidate worktree path validation worktree: prune linked worktree referencing main worktree path worktree: prune duplicate entries referencing same worktree path worktree: make high-level pruning re-usable worktree: give "should be pruned?" function more meaningful name worktree: factor out repeated string literal
2020-06-22diff-files: treat "i-t-a" files as "not-in-index"Libravatar Srinidhi Kaushik1-0/+7
The `diff-files' command and related commands which call the function `cmd_diff_files()', consider the "intent-to-add" files as a part of the index when comparing the work-tree against it. This was previously addressed in commits [1] and [2] by turning the option `--ita-invisible-in-index' (introduced in [3]) on by default. For `diff-files' (and `add -p' as a consequence) to show the i-t-a files as as new, `ita_invisible_in_index' will be enabled by default here as well. [1] 0231ae71d3 (diff: turn --ita-invisible-in-index on by default, 2018-05-26) [2] 425a28e0a4 (diff-lib: allow ita entries treated as "not yet exist in index", 2016-10-24) [3] b42b451919 (diff: add --ita-[in]visible-in-index, 2016-10-24) Signed-off-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-22worktree: drop get_worktrees() unused 'flags' argumentLibravatar Eric Sunshine5-10/+10
get_worktrees() accepts a 'flags' argument, however, there are no existing flags (the lone flag GWT_SORT_LINKED was recently retired) and no behavior which can be tweaked. Therefore, drop the 'flags' argument. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-22worktree: drop get_worktrees() special-purpose sorting optionLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-1/+21
Of all the clients of get_worktrees(), only "git worktree list" wants the list sorted in a very specific way; other clients simply don't care about the order. Rather than imbuing get_worktrees() with special knowledge about how various clients -- now and in the future -- may want the list sorted, drop the sorting capability altogether and make it the client's responsibility to sort the list if needed. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-19builtin/index-pack: add option to specify hash algorithmLibravatar brian m. carlson1-0/+8
git index-pack is usually run in a repository, but need not be. Since packs don't contains information on the algorithm in use, instead relying on context, add an option to index-pack to tell it which one we're using in case someone runs it outside of a repository. Since using --stdin necessarily implies a repository, don't allow specifying an object format if it's provided to prevent users from passing an option that won't work. Add documentation for this option. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-19pull: plug minor memory leak after using is_descendant_of()Libravatar René Scharfe1-0/+1
cmd_pull() builds a commit_list to pass a single potential ancestor to is_descendant_of(). The latter leaves the list intact. Release the allocated memory after the call. Leaking in cmd_*() isn't a big deal, but sets a bad example for other users of is_descendant_of(). Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-18builtin/diff: update usage commentLibravatar Denton Liu1-3/+15
A comment in cmd_diff() states that if one tree-ish and no blobs are provided, (the "N=1, M=0" case), it will provide a diff between the tree and the cache. This is incorrect because a diff happens between the tree-ish and the working tree. Remove the `--cached` in the comment so that the correct behavior is shown. Add a new section describing the "N=1, M=0, --cached" behavior. Next, describe the "N=0, M=0, --cached" case, similar to the above since it is undocumented. Finally, fix some spacing issues. Add spaces between each section for consistency and readability. Also, change tabs within the comment into spaces. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17Merge branch 'en/sparse-checkout'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
The behaviour of "sparse-checkout" in the state "git clone --no-checkout" left was changed accidentally in 2.27, which has been corrected. * en/sparse-checkout: sparse-checkout: avoid staging deletions of all files
2020-06-17Merge branch 'js/reflog-anonymize-for-clone-and-fetch'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-7/+15
The reflog entries for "git clone" and "git fetch" did not anonymize the URL they operated on. * js/reflog-anonymize-for-clone-and-fetch: clone/fetch: anonymize URLs in the reflog
2020-06-17object: drop parsed_object_pool->commit_countLibravatar Abhishek Kumar2-2/+2
14ba97f8 (alloc: allow arbitrary repositories for alloc functions, 2018-05-15) introduced parsed_object_pool->commit_count to keep count of commits per repository and was used to assign commit->index. However, commit-slab code requires commit->index values to be unique and a global count would be correct, rather than a per-repo count. Let's introduce a static counter variable, `parsed_commits_count` to keep track of parsed commits so far. As commit_count has no use anymore, let's also drop it from the struct. Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17branch: don't mix --edit-descriptionLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+1
`git branch` accepts `--edit-description` in conjunction with other arguments. However, `--edit-description` is its own mode, similar to `--set-upstream-to`, which is also made mutually exclusive with other modes. Prevent `--edit-description` from being mixed with other modes. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12clean: optimize and document cases where we recurse into subdirectoriesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+31
Commit 6b1db43109 ("clean: teach clean -d to preserve ignored paths", 2017-05-23) added the following code block (among others) to git-clean: if (remove_directories) dir.flags |= DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO | DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS; The reason for these flags is well documented in the commit message, but isn't obvious just from looking at the code. Add some explanations to the code to make it clearer. Further, it appears git-2.26 did not correctly handle this combination of flags from git-clean. With both these flags and without DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO_MODE_MATCHING set, git is supposed to recurse into all untracked AND ignored directories. git-2.26.0 clearly was not doing that. I don't know the full reasons for that or whether git < 2.27.0 had additional unknown bugs because of that misbehavior, because I don't feel it's worth digging into. As per the huge changes and craziness documented in commit 8d92fb2927 ("dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one", 2020-04-01), the old algorithm was a mess and was thrown out. What I can say is that git-2.27.0 correctly recurses into untracked AND ignored directories with that combination. However, in clean's case we don't need to recurse into ignored directories; that is just a waste of time. Thus, when git-2.27.0 started correctly handling those flags, we got a performance regression report. Rather than relying on other bugs in fill_directory()'s former logic to provide the behavior of skipping ignored directories, make use of the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO_MODE_MATCHING value specifically added in commit eec0f7f2b7 ("status: add option to show ignored files differently", 2017-10-30) for this purpose. Reported-by: Brian Malehorn <bmalehorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12clean: consolidate handling of ignored parametersLibravatar Elijah Newren1-9/+7
I spent a long time trying to figure out how and whether the code worked with different values of ignore, ignore_only, and remove_directories. After lots of time setting up lots of testcases, sifting through lots of print statements, and walking through the debugger, I finally realized that one piece of code related to how it was all setup was found in clean.c rather than dir.c. Make a change that would have made it easier for me to do the extra testing by putting this handling in one spot. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12dir, clean: avoid disallowed behaviorLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
dir.h documented quite clearly that DIR_SHOW_IGNORED and DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO are mutually exclusive, with a big comment to this effect by the definition of both enum values. However, a command like git clean -fx $DIR would set both values for dir.flags. I _think_ it happened to work because: * As dir.h points out, DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS only takes effect if DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO is set. * As coded, I believe DIR_SHOW_IGNORED would just happen to take precedence over DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO in the code as currently constructed. Which is a long way of saying "we just got lucky". Fix clean.c to avoid setting these mutually exclusive values at the same time, and add a check to dir.c that will throw a BUG() to prevent anyone else from making this mistake. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12Documentation: usage for diff combined commitsLibravatar Chris Torek1-1/+7
Document the usage for producing combined commits with "git diff". This includes updating the synopsis section. While here, add the three-dot notation to the synopsis. Make "git diff -h" print the same usage summary as the manual page synopsis, minus the "A..B" form, which is now discouraged. Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-12git diff: improve range handlingLibravatar Chris Torek1-13/+111
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented). This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what is expected. Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird: * If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as the right side. * If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely lost. We will produce a combined diff instead. Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D". Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges, or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense. To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect, produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base. Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10upload-pack: send part of packfile response as uriLibravatar Jonathan Tan1-0/+76
Teach upload-pack to send part of its packfile response as URIs. An administrator may configure a repository with one or more "uploadpack.blobpackfileuri" lines, each line containing an OID, a pack hash, and a URI. A client may configure fetch.uriprotocols to be a comma-separated list of protocols that it is willing to use to fetch additional packfiles - this list will be sent to the server. Whenever an object with one of those OIDs would appear in the packfile transmitted by upload-pack, the server may exclude that object, and instead send the URI. The client will then download the packs referred to by those URIs before performing the connectivity check. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10fetch-pack: support more than one pack lockfileLibravatar Jonathan Tan1-6/+11
Whenever a fetch results in a packfile being downloaded, a .keep file is generated, so that the packfile can be preserved (from, say, a running "git repack") until refs are written referring to the contents of the packfile. In a subsequent patch, a successful fetch using protocol v2 may result in more than one .keep file being generated. Therefore, teach fetch_pack() and the transport mechanism to support multiple .keep files. Implementation notes: - builtin/fetch-pack.c normally does not generate .keep files, and thus is unaffected by this or future changes. However, it has an undocumented "--lock-pack" feature, used by remote-curl.c when implementing the "fetch" remote helper command. In keeping with the remote helper protocol, only one "lock" line will ever be written; the rest will result in warnings to stderr. However, in practice, warnings will never be written because the remote-curl.c "fetch" is only used for protocol v0/v1 (which will not generate multiple .keep files). (Protocol v2 uses the "stateless-connect" command, not the "fetch" command.) - connected.c has an optimization in that connectivity checks on a ref need not be done if the target object is in a pack known to be self-contained and connected. If there are multiple packfiles, this optimization can no longer be done. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10worktree: make "move" refuse to move atop missing registered worktreeLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-2/+1
"git worktree add" takes special care to avoid creating a new worktree at a location already registered to an existing worktree even if that worktree is missing (which can happen, for instance, if the worktree resides on removable media). "git worktree move", however, is not so careful when validating the destination location and will happily move the source worktree atop the location of a missing worktree. This leads to the anomalous situation of multiple worktrees being associated with the same path, which is expressly forbidden by design. For example: $ git clone foo.git $ cd foo $ git worktree add ../bar $ git worktree add ../baz $ rm -rf ../bar $ git worktree move ../baz ../bar $ git worktree list .../foo beefd00f [master] .../bar beefd00f [bar] .../bar beefd00f [baz] $ git worktree remove ../bar fatal: validation failed, cannot remove working tree: '.../bar' does not point back to '.git/worktrees/bar' Fix this shortcoming by enhancing "git worktree move" to perform the same additional validation of the destination directory as done by "git worktree add". While at it, add a test to verify that "git worktree move" won't move a worktree atop an existing (non-worktree) path -- a restriction which has always been in place but was never tested. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10worktree: generalize candidate worktree path validationLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-13/+16
"git worktree add" checks that the specified path is a valid location for a new worktree by ensuring that the path does not already exist and is not already registered to another worktree (a path can be registered but missing, for instance, if it resides on removable media). Since "git worktree add" is not the only command which should perform such validation ("git worktree move" ought to also), generalize the the validation function for use by other callers, as well. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10worktree: prune linked worktree referencing main worktree pathLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-0/+15
"git worktree prune" detects when multiple entries are associated with the same path and prunes the duplicates, however, it does not detect when a linked worktree points at the path of the main worktree. Although "git worktree add" disallows creating a new worktree with the same path as the main worktree, such a case can arise outside the control of Git even without the user mucking with .git/worktree/<id>/ administrative files. For instance: $ git clone foo.git $ git -C foo worktree add ../bar $ rm -rf bar $ mv foo bar $ git -C bar worktree list .../bar deadfeeb [master] .../bar deadfeeb [bar] Help the user recover from such corruption by extending "git worktree prune" to also detect when a linked worktree is associated with the path of the main worktree. Reported-by: Jonathan Müller <jonathanmueller.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10worktree: prune duplicate entries referencing same worktree pathLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-6/+43
A fundamental restriction of linked working trees is that there must only ever be a single worktree associated with a particular path, thus "git worktree add" explicitly disallows creation of a new worktree at the same location as an existing registered worktree. Nevertheless, users can still "shoot themselves in the foot" by mucking with administrative files in .git/worktree/<id>/. Worse, "git worktree move" is careless[1] and allows a worktree to be moved atop a registered but missing worktree (which can happen, for instance, if the worktree is on removable media). For instance: $ git clone foo.git $ cd foo $ git worktree add ../bar $ git worktree add ../baz $ rm -rf ../bar $ git worktree move ../baz ../bar $ git worktree list .../foo beefd00f [master] .../bar beefd00f [bar] .../bar beefd00f [baz] Help users recover from this form of corruption by teaching "git worktree prune" to detect when multiple worktrees are associated with the same path. [1]: A subsequent commit will fix "git worktree move" validation to be more strict. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10worktree: make high-level pruning re-usableLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-6/+9
The low-level logic for removing a worktree is well encapsulated in delete_git_dir(). However, high-level details related to pruning a worktree -- such as dealing with verbosity and dry-run mode -- are not encapsulated. Factor out this high-level logic into its own function so it can be re-used as new worktree corruption detectors are added. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-10worktree: give "should be pruned?" function more meaningful nameLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-2/+2
Readers of the name prune_worktree() are likely to expect the function to actually prune a worktree, however, it only answers the question "should this worktree be pruned?". Give it a name more reflective of its true purpose to avoid such confusion. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08Merge branch 'cb/bisect-helper-parser-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+9
The code to parse "git bisect start" command line was lax in validating the arguments. * cb/bisect-helper-parser-fix: bisect--helper: avoid segfault with bad syntax in `start --term-*`
2020-06-08Merge branch 'dl/remote-curl-deadlock-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
On-the-wire protocol v2 easily falls into a deadlock between the remote-curl helper and the fetch-pack process when the server side prematurely throws an error and disconnects. The communication has been updated to make it more robust. * dl/remote-curl-deadlock-fix: stateless-connect: send response end packet pkt-line: define PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END remote-curl: error on incomplete packet pkt-line: extern packet_length() transport: extract common fetch_pack() call remote-curl: remove label indentation remote-curl: fix typo
2020-06-08Merge branch 'bc/filter-process'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+1
Code simplification and test coverage enhancement. * bc/filter-process: t2060: add a test for switch with --orphan and --discard-changes builtin/checkout: simplify metadata initialization
2020-06-08Merge branch 'tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-28/+47
Clean-up the commit-graph codepath. * tb/commit-graph-no-check-oids: commit-graph: drop COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS flag t5318: reorder test below 'graph_read_expect' commit-graph.c: simplify 'fill_oids_from_commits' builtin/commit-graph.c: dereference tags in builtin builtin/commit-graph.c: extract 'read_one_commit()' commit-graph.c: peel refs in 'add_ref_to_set' commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits commit-graph.c: extract 'refs_cb_data'
2020-06-08worktree: factor out repeated string literalLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-11/+12
For each worktree removed by "git worktree prune", it reports the reason for the removal. All reasons share the common prefix "Removing worktrees/%s:". As new removal reasons are added, this prefix needs to be duplicated, which is error-prone and potentially cumbersome. Therefore, factor out the common prefix. Although this change seems to increase the "sentence lego quotient", it should be reasonably safe, as the reason for removal is a distinct clause, not strictly related to the prefix. Moreover, the "worktrees" in "Removing worktrees/%s:" is a path literal which ought not be localized, so by factoring it out, we can more easily avoid exposing that path fragment to translators. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-05sparse-checkout: upgrade repository to version 1 when enabling extensionLibravatar Xin Li1-0/+2
The 'extensions' configuration variable gets special meaning in the new repository version, so when enabling the extension we should upgrade the repository to version 1. Signed-off-by: Xin Li <delphij@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-05fetch: allow adding a filter after initial cloneLibravatar Xin Li1-3/+0
Retroactively adding a filter can be useful for existing shallow clones as they allow users to see earlier change histories without downloading all git objects in a regular --unshallow fetch. Without this patch, users can make a clone partial by editing the repository configuration to convert the remote into a promisor, like:   git config core.repositoryFormatVersion 1   git config extensions.partialClone origin   git fetch --unshallow --filter=blob:none origin Since the hard part of making this work is already in place and such edits can be error-prone, teach Git to perform the required configuration change automatically instead. Note that this change does not modify the existing git behavior which recognizes setting extensions.partialClone without changing repositoryFormatVersion. Signed-off-by: Xin Li <delphij@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-05sparse-checkout: avoid staging deletions of all filesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+4
sparse-checkout's purpose is to update the working tree to have it reflect a subset of the tracked files. As such, it shouldn't be switching branches, making commits, downloading or uploading data, or staging or unstaging changes. Other than updating the worktree, the only thing sparse-checkout should touch is the SKIP_WORKTREE bit of the index. In particular, this sets up a nice invariant: running sparse-checkout will never change the status of any file in `git status` (reflecting the fact that we only set the SKIP_WORKTREE bit if the file is safe to delete, i.e. if the file is unmodified). Traditionally, we did a _really_ bad job with this goal. The predecessor to sparse-checkout involved manual editing of .git/info/sparse-checkout and running `git read-tree -mu HEAD`. That command would stage and unstage changes and overwrite dirty changes in the working tree. The initial implementation of the sparse-checkout command was no better; it simply invoked `git read-tree -mu HEAD` as a subprocess and had the same caveats, though this issue came up repeatedly in review comments and workarounds for the problems were put in place before the feature was merged[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; especially see 4 & 6]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFT9A5n=_bx5LsjCvbogqwSjiwgr5amcjgbU1iAk4KLJg@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BEmwSwg4tgJg6nVG8a3Hpn_g-=ZjApZF4EiJO+qVgu4uw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFV7TA0qwZCQpHCqx9N+JifyRyuBQ-pZ_oGfe-NOgyh7A@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BHYCCD+Vx5fq35jH82eHc1-P53Lz_aGNpHJNcx9kg2K-A@mail.gmail.com/ [5] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BF+JWYZfDqp2Tn4AEKVp4b0YMA=Mbz4Nz62D-gGgiduYQ@mail.gmail.com/ [6] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20191121163706.GV23183@szeder.dev/ However, these workarounds, in addition to disabling the feature in a number of important cases, also missed one special case. I'll get back to it later. In the 2.27.0 cycle, the disabling of the feature was lifted by finally replacing the internal equivalent of `git read-tree -mu HEAD` with something that did what we wanted: the new update_sparsity() function in unpack-trees.c that only ever updates SKIP_WORKTREE bits in the index and updates the working tree to match. This new function handles all the cases that were problematic for the old implementation, except that it breaks the same special case that avoided the workarounds of the old implementation, but broke it in a different way. So...that brings us to the special case: a git clone performed with --no-checkout. As per the meaning of the flag, --no-checkout does not check out any branch, with the implication that you aren't on one and need to switch to one after the clone. Implementationally, HEAD is still set (so in some sense you are partially on a branch), but * the index is "unborn" (non-existent) * there are no files in the working tree (other than .git/) * the next time git switch (or git checkout) is run it will run unpack_trees with `initial_checkout` flag set to true. It is not until you run, e.g. `git switch <somebranch>` that the index will be written and files in the working tree populated. With this special --no-checkout case, the traditional `read-tree -mu HEAD` behavior would have done the equivalent of acting like checkout -- switch to the default branch (HEAD), write out an index that matches HEAD, and update the working tree to match. This special case slipped through the avoid-making-changes checks in the original sparse-checkout command and thus continued there. After update_sparsity() was introduced and used (see commit f56f31af03 ("sparse-checkout: use new update_sparsity() function", 2020-03-27)), the behavior for the --no-checkout case changed: Due to git's auto-vivification of an empty in-memory index (see do_read_index() and note that `must_exist` is false), and due to sparse-checkout's update_working_directory() code to always write out the index after it was done, we got a new bug. That made it so that sparse-checkout would switch the repository from a clone with an "unborn" index (i.e. still needing an initial_checkout), to one that had a recorded index with no entries. Thus, instead of all the files appearing deleted in `git status` being known to git as a special artifact of not yet being on a branch, our recording of an empty index made it suddenly look to git as though it was definitely on a branch with ALL files staged for deletion! A subsequent checkout or switch then had to contend with the fact that it wasn't on an initial_checkout but had a bunch of staged deletions. Make sure that sparse-checkout changes nothing in the index other than the SKIP_WORKTREE bit; in particular, when the index is unborn we do not have any branch checked out so there is no sparsification or de-sparsification work to do. Simply return from update_working_directory() early. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-04clone/fetch: anonymize URLs in the reflogLibravatar Johannes Schindelin2-7/+15
Even if we strongly discourage putting credentials into the URLs passed via the command-line, there _is_ support for that, and users _do_ do that. Let's scrub them before writing them to the reflog. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-02Merge branch 'rs/checkout-b-track-error'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The error message from "git checkout -b foo -t bar baz" was confusing. * rs/checkout-b-track-error: checkout: improve error messages for -b with extra argument checkout: add tests for -b and --track
2020-06-02Merge branch 'an/merge-single-strategy-optim'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code optimization for a common case. * an/merge-single-strategy-optim: merge: optimization to skip evaluate_result for single strategy