summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin/stash.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-03-22Merge branch 'dl/stash-show-untracked'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+61
"git stash show" learned to optionally show untracked part of the stash. * dl/stash-show-untracked: stash show: learn stash.showIncludeUntracked stash show: teach --include-untracked and --only-untracked
2021-03-05stash show: learn stash.showIncludeUntrackedLibravatar Denton Liu1-0/+8
The previous commit teaches `git stash show --include-untracked`. It may be desirable for a user to be able to always enable the --include-untracked behavior. Teach the stash.showIncludeUntracked config option which allows users to do this in a similar manner to stash.showPatch. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-05stash show: teach --include-untracked and --only-untrackedLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+53
Stash entries can be made with untracked files via `git stash push --include-untracked`. However, because the untracked files are stored in the third parent of the stash entry and not the stash entry itself, running `git stash show` does not include the untracked files as part of the diff. With --include-untracked, untracked paths, which are recorded in the third-parent if it exists, are shown in addition to the paths that have modifications between the stash base and the working tree in the stash. It is possible to manually craft a malformed stash entry where duplicate untracked files in the stash entry will mask tracked files. We detect and error out in that case via a custom unpack_trees() callback: stash_worktree_untracked_merge(). Also, teach stash the --only-untracked option which only shows the untracked files of a stash entry. This is similar to `git show stash^3` but it is nice to provide a convenient abstraction for it so that users do not have to think about the underlying implementation. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-25Merge branch 'js/params-vs-args'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Messages update. * js/params-vs-args: replace "parameters" by "arguments" in error messages
2021-02-23replace "parameters" by "arguments" in error messagesLibravatar Johannes Sixt1-1/+1
When an error message informs the user about an incorrect command invocation, it should refer to "arguments", not "parameters". Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-11stash: declare ref_stash as an arrayLibravatar Denton Liu1-1/+1
Save sizeof(const char *) bytes by declaring ref_stash as an array instead of having a redundant pointer to an array. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-05Merge branch 'en/stash-apply-sparse-checkout' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-49/+116
"git stash" did not work well in a sparsely checked out working tree. * en/stash-apply-sparse-checkout: stash: fix stash application in sparse-checkouts stash: remove unnecessary process forking t7012: add a testcase demonstrating stash apply bugs in sparse checkouts
2021-01-15Merge branch 'en/stash-apply-sparse-checkout'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-49/+116
"git stash" did not work well in a sparsely checked out working tree. * en/stash-apply-sparse-checkout: stash: fix stash application in sparse-checkouts stash: remove unnecessary process forking t7012: add a testcase demonstrating stash apply bugs in sparse checkouts
2020-12-01stash: fix stash application in sparse-checkoutsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+48
sparse-checkouts are built on the patterns in the $GIT_DIR/info/sparse-checkout file, where commands have modified behavior for paths that do not match those patterns. The differences in behavior, as far as the bugs concerned here, fall into three different categories (with git subcommands that fall into each category listed): * commands that only look at files matching the patterns: * status * diff * clean * update-index * commands that remove files from the working tree that do not match the patterns, and restore files that do match them: * read-tree * switch * checkout * reset (--hard) * commands that omit writing files to the working tree that do not match the patterns, unless those files are not clean: * merge * rebase * cherry-pick * revert There are some caveats above, e.g. a plain `git diff` ignores files outside the sparsity patterns but will show diffs for paths outside the sparsity patterns when revision arguments are passed. (Technically, diff is treating the sparse paths as matching HEAD.) So, there is some internal inconsistency among these commands. There are also additional commands that should behave differently in the face of sparse-checkouts, as the sparse-checkout documentation alludes to, but the above is sufficient for me to explain how `git stash` is affected. What is relevant here is that logically 'stash' should behave like a merge; it three-way merges the changes the user had in progress at stash creation time, the HEAD at the time the stash was created, and the current HEAD, in order to get the stashed changes applied to the current branch. However, this simplistic view doesn't quite work in practice, because stash tweaks it a bit due to two factors: (1) flags like --keep-index and --include-untracked (why we used two different verbs, 'keep' and 'include', is a rant for another day) modify what should be staged at the end and include more things that should be quasi-merged, (2) stash generally wants changes to NOT be staged. It only provides exceptions when (a) some of the changes had conflicts and thus we want to use stages to denote the clean merges and higher order stages to mark the conflicts, or (b) if there is a brand new file we don't want it to become untracked. stash has traditionally gotten this special behavior by first doing a merge, and then when it's clean, applying a pipeline of commands to modify the result. This series of commands for unstaging-non-newly-added-files came from the following commands: git diff-index --cached --name-only --diff-filter=A $CTREE >"$a" git read-tree --reset $CTREE git update-index --add --stdin <"$a" rm -f "$a" Looking back at the different types of special sparsity handling listed at the beginning of this message, you may note that we have at least one of each type covered here: merge, diff-index, and read-tree. The weird mix-and-match led to 3 different bugs: (1) If a path merged cleanly and it didn't match the sparsity patterns, the merge backend would know to avoid writing it to the working tree and keep the SKIP_WORKTREE bit, simply only updating it in the index. Unfortunately, the subsequent commands would essentially undo the changes in the index and thus simply toss the changes altogether since there was nothing left in the working tree. This means the stash is only partially applied. (2) If a path existed in the worktree before `git stash apply` despite having the SKIP_WORKTREE bit set, then the `git read-tree --reset` would print an error message of the form error: Entry 'modified' not uptodate. Cannot merge. and cause stash to abort early. (3) If there was a brand new file added by the stash, then the diff-index command would save that pathname to the temporary file, the read-tree --reset would remove it from the index, and the update-index command would barf due to no such file being present in the working copy; it would print a message of the form: error: NEWFILE: does not exist and --remove not passed fatal: Unable to process path NEWFILE and then cause stash to abort early. Basically, the whole idea of unstage-unless-brand-new requires special care when you are dealing with a sparse-checkout. Fix these problems by applying the following simple rule: When we unstage files, if they have the SKIP_WORKTREE bit set, clear that bit and write the file out to the working directory. (*) If there's already a file present in the way, rename it first. This fixes all three problems in t7012.13 and allows us to mark it as passing. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-01stash: remove unnecessary process forkingLibravatar Elijah Newren1-49/+70
When stash was converted from shell to a builtin, it merely transliterated the forking of various git commands from shell to a C program that would fork the same commands. Some of those were converted over to actual library calls, but much of the pipeline-of-commands design still remains. Fix some of this by replacing the portion corresponding to git diff-index --cached --name-only --diff-filter=A $CTREE >"$a" git read-tree --reset $CTREE git update-index --add --stdin <"$a" rm -f "$a" into a library function that does the same thing. (The read-tree --reset was already partially converted over to a library call, but as an independent piece.) Note here that this came after a merge operation was performed. The merge machinery always stages anything that cleanly merges, and the above code only runs if there are no conflicts. Its purpose is to make it so that when there are no conflicts, all the changes from the stash are unstaged. However, that causes brand new files from the stash to become untracked, so the code above first saves those files off and then re-adds them afterwards. We replace the whole series of commands with a simple function that will unstage files that are not newly added. This doesn't fix any bugs in the usage of these commands, it simply matches the existing behavior but makes it into a single atomic operation that we can then operate on as a whole. A subsequent commit will take advantage of this to fix issues with these commands in sparse-checkouts. This conversion incidentally fixes t3906.1, because the separate update-index process would die with the following error messages: error: uninitialized_sub: is a directory - add files inside instead fatal: Unable to process path uninitialized_sub The unstaging of the directory as a submodule meant it was no longer tracked, and thus as an uninitialized directory it could not be added back using `git update-index --add`, thus resulting in this error and early abort. Most of the submodule tests in 3906 continue to fail after this change, this change was just enough to push the first of those tests to success. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-30Merge branch 'km/stash-error-message-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Error message fix. * km/stash-error-message-fix: stash: add missing space to an error message
2020-11-24stash: add missing space to an error messageLibravatar Kyle Meyer1-1/+1
Restore a space that was lost in 8a0fc8d19d (stash: convert apply to builtin, 2019-02-25). Signed-off-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-01stash: simplify reflog emptiness checkLibravatar René Scharfe1-14/+13
Calling rev-parse to check if the drop subcommand removed the last stash and treating its failure as confirmation is fragile, as the command can fail for other reasons, e.g. because the system is out of memory. Directly check if the reflog is empty instead, which is more robust. Reported-by: Marek Mrva <mrva@eof-studios.com> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-09Merge branch 'jt/interpret-branch-name-fallback'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git status" has trouble showing where it came from by interpreting reflog entries that recordcertain events, e.g. "checkout @{u}", and gives a hard/fatal error. Even though it inherently is impossible to give a correct answer because the reflog entries lose some information (e.g. "@{u}" does not record what branch the user was on hence which branch 'the upstream' needs to be computed, and even if the record were available, the relationship between branches may have changed), at least hide the error to allow "status" show its output. * jt/interpret-branch-name-fallback: wt-status: tolerate dangling marks refs: move dwim_ref() to header file sha1-name: replace unsigned int with option struct
2020-09-02wt-status: tolerate dangling marksLibravatar Jonathan Tan1-1/+1
When a user checks out the upstream branch of HEAD, the upstream branch not being a local branch, and then runs "git status", like this: git clone $URL client cd client git checkout @{u} git status no status is printed, but instead an error message: fatal: HEAD does not point to a branch (This error message when running "git branch" persists even after checking out other things - it only stops after checking out a branch.) This is because "git status" reads the reflog when determining the "HEAD detached" message, and thus attempts to DWIM "@{u}", but that doesn't work because HEAD no longer points to a branch. Therefore, when calculating the status of a worktree, tolerate dangling marks. This is done by adding an additional parameter to dwim_ref() and repo_dwim_ref(). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-18dir: fix problematic API to avoid memory leaksLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+2
The dir structure seemed to have a number of leaks and problems around it. First I noticed that parent_hashmap and recursive_hashmap were being leaked (though Peff noticed and submitted fixes before me). Then I noticed in the previous commit that clear_directory() was only taking responsibility for a subset of fields within dir_struct, despite the fact that entries[] and ignored[] we allocated internally to dir.c. That, of course, resulted in many callers either leaking or haphazardly trying to free these arrays and their contents. Digging further, I found that despite the pretty clear documentation near the top of dir.h that folks were supposed to call clear_directory() when the user no longer needed the dir_struct, there were four callers that didn't bother doing that at all. However, two of them clearly thought about leaks since they had an UNLEAK(dir) directive, which to me suggests that the method to free the data was too unclear. I suspect the non-obviousness of the API and its holes led folks to avoid it, which then snowballed into further problems with the entries[], ignored[], parent_hashmap, and recursive_hashmap problems. Rename clear_directory() to dir_clear() to be more in line with other data structures in git, and introduce a dir_init() to handle the suggested memsetting of dir_struct to all zeroes. I hope that a name like "dir_clear()" is more clear, and that the presence of dir_init() will provide a hint to those looking at the code that they need to look for either a dir_clear() or a dir_free() and lead them to find dir_clear(). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-18dir: make clear_directory() free all relevant memoryLibravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+0
The calling convention for the dir API is supposed to end with a call to clear_directory() to free up no longer needed memory. However, clear_directory() didn't free dir->entries or dir->ignored. I believe this was an oversight, but a number of callers noticed memory leaks and started free'ing these. Unfortunately, they did so somewhat haphazardly (sometimes freeing the entries in the arrays, and sometimes only free'ing the arrays themselves). This suggests the callers weren't trying to make sure any possible memory used might be free'd, but just the memory they noticed their usecase definitely had allocated. Fix this mess by moving all the duplicated free'ing logic into clear_directory(). End by resetting dir to a pristine state so it could be reused if desired. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-30strvec: rename struct fieldsLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+4
The "argc" and "argv" names made sense when the struct was argv_array, but now they're just confusing. Let's rename them to "nr" (which we use for counts elsewhere) and "v" (which is rather terse, but reads well when combined with typical variable names like "args.v"). Note that we have to update all of the callers immediately. Playing tricks with the preprocessor is hard here, because we wouldn't want to rewrite unrelated tokens. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-28strvec: fix indentation in renamed callsLibravatar Jeff King1-19/+19
Code which split an argv_array call across multiple lines, like: argv_array_pushl(&args, "one argument", "another argument", "and more", NULL); was recently mechanically renamed to use strvec, which results in mis-matched indentation like: strvec_pushl(&args, "one argument", "another argument", "and more", NULL); Let's fix these up to align the arguments with the opening paren. I did this manually by sifting through the results of: git jump grep 'strvec_.*,$' and liberally applying my editor's auto-format. Most of the changes are of the form shown above, though I also normalized a few that had originally used a single-tab indentation (rather than our usual style of aligning with the open paren). I also rewrapped a couple of obvious cases (e.g., where previously too-long lines became short enough to fit on one), but I wasn't aggressive about it. In cases broken to three or more lines, the grouping of arguments is sometimes meaningful, and it wasn't worth my time or reviewer time to ponder each case individually. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-28strvec: convert builtin/ callers away from argv_array nameLibravatar Jeff King1-57/+57
We eventually want to drop the argv_array name and just use strvec consistently. There's no particular reason we have to do it all at once, or care about interactions between converted and unconverted bits. Because of our preprocessor compat layer, the names are interchangeable to the compiler (so even a definition and declaration using different names is OK). This patch converts all of the files in builtin/ to keep the diff to a manageable size. The conversion was done purely mechanically with: git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' | xargs perl -i -pe ' s/ARGV_ARRAY/STRVEC/g; s/argv_array/strvec/g; ' and then selectively staging files with "git add builtin/". We'll deal with any indentation/style fallouts separately. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-28strvec: rename files from argv-array to strvecLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
This requires updating #include lines across the code-base, but that's all fairly mechanical, and was done with: git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' | xargs perl -i -pe 's/argv-array.h/strvec.h/' Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-29Merge branch 'en/fill-directory-exponential'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+5
The directory traversal code had redundant recursive calls which made its performance characteristics exponential with respect to the depth of the tree, which was corrected. * en/fill-directory-exponential: completion: fix 'git add' on paths under an untracked directory Fix error-prone fill_directory() API; make it only return matches dir: replace double pathspec matching with single in treat_directory() dir: include DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS handling in treat_directory() dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one dir: refactor treat_directory to clarify control flow dir: fix confusion based on variable tense dir: fix broken comment dir: consolidate treat_path() and treat_one_path() dir: fix simple typo in comment t3000: add more testcases testing a variety of ls-files issues t7063: more thorough status checking
2020-04-28Merge branch 'js/stash-p-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Allowing the user to split a patch hunk while "git stash -p" does not work well; a band-aid has been added to make this (partially) work better. * js/stash-p-fix: stash -p: (partially) fix bug concerning split hunks t3904: fix incorrect demonstration of a bug
2020-04-08stash -p: (partially) fix bug concerning split hunksLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
When trying to stash part of the worktree changes by splitting a hunk and then only partially accepting the split bits and pieces, the user is presented with a rather cryptic error: error: patch failed: <file>:<line> error: test: patch does not apply Cannot remove worktree changes and the command would fail to stash the desired parts of the worktree changes (even if the `stash` ref was actually updated correctly). We even have a test case demonstrating that failure, carrying it for four years already. The explanation: when splitting a hunk, the changed lines are no longer separated by more than 3 lines (which is the amount of context lines Git's diffs use by default), but less than that. So when staging only part of the diff hunk for stashing, the resulting diff that we want to apply to the worktree in reverse will contain those changes to be dropped surrounded by three context lines, but since the diff is relative to HEAD rather than to the worktree, these context lines will not match. Example time. Let's assume that the file README contains these lines: We the people and the worktree added some lines so that it contains these lines instead: We are the kind people and the user tries to stash the line containing "are", then the command will internally stage this line to a temporary index file and try to revert the diff between HEAD and that index file. The diff hunk that `git stash` tries to revert will look somewhat like this: @@ -1776,3 +1776,4 We +are the people It is obvious, now, that the trailing context lines overlap with the part of the original diff hunk that the user did *not* want to stash. Keeping in mind that context lines in diffs serve the primary purpose of finding the exact location when the diff does not apply precisely (but when the exact line number in the file to be patched differs from the line number indicated in the diff), we work around this by reducing the amount of context lines: the diff was just generated. Note: this is not a *full* fix for the issue. Just as demonstrated in t3701's 'add -p works with pathological context lines' test case, there are ambiguities in the diff format. It is very rare in practice, of course, to encounter such repeated lines. The full solution for such cases would be to replace the approach of generating a diff from the stash and then applying it in reverse by emulating `git revert` (i.e. doing a 3-way merge). However, in `git stash -p` it would not apply to `HEAD` but instead to the worktree, which makes this non-trivial to implement as long as we also maintain a scripted version of `add -i`. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-01Fix error-prone fill_directory() API; make it only return matchesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-12/+5
Traditionally, the expected calling convention for the dir.c API was: fill_directory(&dir, ..., pathspec) foreach entry in dir->entries: if (dir_path_match(entry, pathspec)) process_or_display(entry) This may have made sense once upon a time, because the fill_directory() call could use cheap checks to avoid doing full pathspec matching, and an external caller may have wanted to do other post-processing of the results anyway. However: * this structure makes it easy for users of the API to get it wrong * this structure actually makes it harder to understand fill_directory() and the functions it uses internally. It has tripped me up several times while trying to fix bugs and restructure things. * relying on post-filtering was already found to produce wrong results; pathspec matching had to be added internally for multiple cases in order to get the right results (see commits 404ebceda01c (dir: also check directories for matching pathspecs, 2019-09-17) and 89a1f4aaf765 (dir: if our pathspec might match files under a dir, recurse into it, 2019-09-17)) * it's bad for performance: fill_directory() already has to do lots of checks and knows the subset of cases where it still needs to do more checks. Forcing external callers to do full pathspec matching means they must re-check _every_ path. So, add the pathspec matching within the fill_directory() internals, and remove it from external callers. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-26Merge branch 'tg/retire-scripted-stash'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-39/+11
"git stash" has kept an escape hatch to use the scripted version for a few releases, which got stale. It has been removed. * tg/retire-scripted-stash: stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting stash: get git_stash_config at the top level
2020-03-09Merge branch 'am/pathspec-f-f-more'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-38/+41
"git rm" and "git stash" learns the new "--pathspec-from-file" option. * am/pathspec-f-f-more: stash push: support the --pathspec-from-file option stash: eliminate crude option parsing doc: stash: synchronize <pathspec> description doc: stash: document more options doc: stash: split options from description (2) doc: stash: split options from description (1) rm: support the --pathspec-from-file option doc: rm: synchronize <pathspec> description
2020-03-05stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin settingLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-37/+10
Remove the stash.useBuiltin setting which was added as an escape hatch to disable the builtin version of stash first released with Git 2.22. Carrying the legacy version is a maintenance burden, and has in fact become out of date failing a test since the 2.23 release, without anyone noticing until now. So users would be getting a hint to fall back to a potentially buggy version of the tool. We used to shell out to git config to get the useBuiltin configuration to avoid changing any global state before spawning legacy-stash. However that is no longer necessary, so just use the 'git_config' function to get the setting instead. Similar to what we've done in d03ebd411c ("rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting", 2019-03-18), where we remove the corresponding setting for rebase, we leave the documentation in place, so people can refer back to it when searching for it online, and so we can refer to it in the commit message. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-03stash: get git_stash_config at the top levelLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-3/+2
In the next commit we're adding another config variable to be read from 'git_stash_config', that is valid for the top level command instead of just a subset. Move the 'git_config' invocation for 'git_stash_config' to the top-level to prepare for that. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-19stash push: support the --pathspec-from-file optionLibravatar Alexandr Miloslavskiy1-0/+20
Decisions taken for simplicity: 1) For now, `--pathspec-from-file` is declared incompatible with `--patch`, even when <file> is not `-`. Such use case is not really expected. 2) It is not allowed to pass pathspec in both args and file. Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-19stash: eliminate crude option parsingLibravatar Alexandr Miloslavskiy1-38/+21
Eliminate crude option parsing and rely on real parsing instead, because 1) Crude parsing is crude, for example it's not capable of handling things like `git stash -m Message` 2) Adding options in two places is inconvenient and prone to bugs As a side result, the case of `git stash -m Message` gets fixed. Also give a good error message instead of just throwing usage at user. ---- Some review of what's been happening to this code: Before [1], `git-stash.sh` only verified that all args begin with `-` : # The default command is "push" if nothing but options are given seen_non_option= for opt do case "$opt" in --) break ;; -*) ;; *) seen_non_option=t; break ;; esac done Later, [1] introduced the duplicate code I'm now removing, also making the previous test more strict by white-listing options. ---- [1] Commit 40af1468 ("stash: convert `stash--helper.c` into `stash.c`" 2019-02-26) Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-05Merge branch 'js/patch-mode-in-others-in-c'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+14
The effort to move "git-add--interactive" to C continues. * js/patch-mode-in-others-in-c: commit --interactive: make it work with the built-in `add -i` built-in add -p: implement the "worktree" patch modes built-in add -p: implement the "checkout" patch modes built-in stash: use the built-in `git add -p` if so configured legacy stash -p: respect the add.interactive.usebuiltin setting built-in add -p: implement the "stash" and "reset" patch modes built-in add -p: prepare for patch modes other than "stage"
2019-12-21built-in stash: use the built-in `git add -p` if so configuredLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-11/+14
The scripted version of `git stash` called directly into the Perl script `git-add--interactive.perl`, and this was faithfully converted to C. However, we have a much better way to do this now: call the internal API directly, which will now incidentally also respect the `add.interactive.useBuiltin` setting. Let's just do this. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-01Merge branch 'tg/stash-refresh-index'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+3
Recent update to "git stash pop" made the command empty the index when run with the "--quiet" option, which has been corrected. * tg/stash-refresh-index: stash: make sure we have a valid index before writing it
2019-11-14stash: make sure we have a valid index before writing itLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-4/+3
In 'do_apply_stash()' we refresh the index in the end. Since 34933d0eff ("stash: make sure to write refreshed cache", 2019-09-11), we also write that refreshed index when --quiet is given to 'git stash apply'. However if '--index' is not given to 'git stash apply', we also discard the index in the else clause just before. We need to do so because we use an external 'git update-index --add --stdin', which leads to an out of date in-core index. Later we call 'refresh_and_write_cache', which now leads to writing the discarded index, which means we essentially write an empty index file. This is obviously not correct, or the behaviour the user wanted. We should not modify the users index without being asked to do so. Make sure to re-read the index after discarding the current in-core index, to avoid dealing with outdated information. Instead we could also drop the 'discard_cache()' + 'read_cache()', however that would make it easy to fall into the same trap as 34933d0eff did, so it's better to avoid that. We can also drop the 'refresh_and_write_cache' completely in the quiet case. Previously in legacy stash we relied on 'git status' to refresh the index after calling 'git read-tree' when '--index' was passed to 'git apply'. However the 'reset_tree()' call that replaced 'git read-tree' always passes options that are equivalent to '-m', making the refresh of the index unnecessary. Reported-by: Grzegorz Rajchman <rayman17@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Merge branch 'js/update-index-ignore-removal-for-skip-worktree'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
"git stash save" in a working tree that is sparsely checked out mistakenly removed paths that are outside the area of interest. * js/update-index-ignore-removal-for-skip-worktree: stash: handle staged changes in skip-worktree files correctly update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone
2019-11-02stash: handle staged changes in skip-worktree files correctlyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-2/+3
When calling `git stash` while changes were staged for files that are marked with the `skip-worktree` bit (e.g. files that are excluded in a sparse checkout), the files are recorded as _deleted_ instead. The reason is that `git stash` tries to construct the tree reflecting the worktree essentially by copying the index to a temporary one and then updating the files from the worktree. Crucially, it calls `git diff-index` to update also those files that are in the HEAD but have been unstaged in the index. However, when the temporary index is updated via `git update-index --add --remove`, skip-worktree entries mark the files as deleted by mistake. Let's use the newly-introduced `--ignore-skip-worktree-entries` option of `git update-index` to prevent exactly this from happening. Note that the regression test case deliberately avoids replicating the scenario described above and instead tries to recreate just the symptom. Reported by Dan Thompson. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-18Merge branch 'jj/stash-reset-only-toplevel'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git stash save" lost local changes to submodules, which has been corrected. * jj/stash-reset-only-toplevel: stash: avoid recursive hard reset on submodules
2019-10-15Merge branch 'en/merge-recursive-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
The merge-recursive machiery is one of the most complex parts of the system that accumulated cruft over time. This large series cleans up the implementation quite a bit. * en/merge-recursive-cleanup: (26 commits) merge-recursive: fix the fix to the diff3 common ancestor label merge-recursive: fix the diff3 common ancestor label for virtual commits merge-recursive: alphabetize include list merge-recursive: add sanity checks for relevant merge_options merge-recursive: rename MERGE_RECURSIVE_* to MERGE_VARIANT_* merge-recursive: split internal fields into a separate struct merge-recursive: avoid losing output and leaking memory holding that output merge-recursive: comment and reorder the merge_options fields merge-recursive: consolidate unnecessary fields in merge_options merge-recursive: move some definitions around to clean up the header merge-recursive: rename merge_options argument to opt in header merge-recursive: rename 'mrtree' to 'result_tree', for clarity merge-recursive: use common name for ancestors/common/base_list merge-recursive: fix some overly long lines cache-tree: share code between functions writing an index as a tree merge-recursive: don't force external callers to do our logging merge-recursive: remove useless parameter in merge_trees() merge-recursive: exit early if index != head Ensure index matches head before invoking merge machinery, round N merge-recursive: remove another implicit dependency on the_repository ...
2019-10-15stash: avoid recursive hard reset on submodulesLibravatar Jakob Jarmar1-1/+1
git stash push does not recursively stash submodules, but if submodule.recurse is set, it may recursively reset --hard them. Having only the destructive action recurse is likely to be surprising behaviour, and unlikely to be desirable, so the easiest fix should be to ensure that the call to git reset --hard never recurses into submodules. This matches the behavior of check_changes_tracked_files, which ignores submodules. Signed-off-by: Jakob Jarmar <jakob@jarmar.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-11Merge branch 'js/stash-apply-in-secondary-worktree'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
"git stash apply" in a subdirectory of a secondary worktree failed to access the worktree correctly, which has been corrected. * js/stash-apply-in-secondary-worktree: stash apply: report status correctly even in a worktree's subdirectory
2019-10-06stash apply: report status correctly even in a worktree's subdirectoryLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
When Git wants to spawn a child Git process inside a worktree's subdirectory while `GIT_DIR` is set, we need to take care of specifying the work tree's top-level directory explicitly because it cannot be discovered: the current directory is _not_ the top-level directory of the work tree, and neither is it inside the parent directory of `GIT_DIR`. This fixes the problem where `git stash apply` would report pretty much everything deleted or untracked when run inside a worktree's subdirectory. To make sure that we do not introduce the "reverse problem", i.e. when `GIT_WORK_TREE` is defined but `GIT_DIR` is not, we simply make sure that both are set. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-20stash: make sure to write refreshed cacheLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-4/+7
When converting stash into C, calls to 'git update-index --refresh' were replaced with the 'refresh_cache()' function. That is fine as long as the index is only needed in-core, and not re-read from disk. However in many cases we do actually need the refreshed index to be written to disk, for example 'merge_recursive_generic()' discards the in-core index before re-reading it from disk, and in the case of 'apply --quiet', the 'refresh_cache()' we currently have is pointless without writing the index to disk. Always write the index after refreshing it to ensure there are no regressions in this compared to the scripted stash. In the future we can consider avoiding the write where possible after making sure none of the subsequent calls actually need the refreshed cache, and it is not expected to be refreshed after stash exits or it is written somewhere else already. Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-19Ensure index matches head before invoking merge machinery, round NLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+2
This is the bug that just won't die; there always seems to be another form of it somewhere. See the commit message of 55f39cf7551b ("merge: fix misleading pre-merge check documentation", 2018-06-30) for a more detailed explanation), but in short: <quick summary> builtin/merge.c contains this important requirement for merge strategies: ...the index must be in sync with the head commit. The strategies are responsible to ensure this. This condition is important to enforce because there are two likely failure cases when the index isn't in sync with the head commit: * we silently throw away changes the user had staged before the merge * we accidentally (and silently) include changes in the merge that were not part of either of the branches/trees being merged Discarding users' work and mis-merging are both bad outcomes, especially when done silently, so naturally this rule was stated sternly -- but, unfortunately totally ignored in practice unless and until actual bugs were found. But, fear not: the bugs from this were fixed in commit ee6566e8d70d ("[PATCH] Rewrite read-tree", 2005-09-05) through a rewrite of read-tree (again, commit 55f39cf7551b has a more detailed explanation of how this affected merge). And it was fixed again in commit 160252f81626 ("git-merge-ours: make sure our index matches HEAD", 2005-11-03) ...and it was fixed again in commit 3ec62ad9ffba ("merge-octopus: abort if index does not match HEAD", 2016-04-09) ...and again in commit 65170c07d466 ("merge-recursive: avoid incorporating uncommitted changes in a merge", 2017-12-21) ...and again in commit eddd1a411d93 ("merge-recursive: enforce rule that index matches head before merging", 2018-06-30) ...with multiple testcases added to the testsuite that could be enumerated in even more commits. Then, finally, in a patch in the same series as the last fix above, the documentation about this requirement was fixed in commit 55f39cf7551b ("merge: fix misleading pre-merge check documentation", 2018-06-30), and we all lived happily ever after... </quick summary> Unfortunately, "ever after" apparently denotes a limited time and it expired today. The merge-recursive rule to enforce that index matches head was at the beginning of merge_trees() and would only trigger when opt->call_depth was 0. Since merge_recursive() doesn't call merge_trees() until after returning from recursing, this meant that the check wasn't triggered by merge_recursive() until it had first finished all the intermediate merges to create virtual merge bases. That is a potentially HUGE amount of computation (and writing of intermediate merge results into the .git/objects directory) before it errors out and says, in effect, "Sorry, I can't do any merging because you have some local changes that would be overwritten." Trying to enforce that all of merge_trees(), merge_recursive(), and merge_recursive_generic() checked the index == head condition earlier resulted in a bunch of broken tests. It turns out that merge_recursive() has code to drop and reload the cache while recursing to create intermediate virtual merge bases, but unfortunately that code runs even when no recursion is necessary. This unconditional dropping and reloading of the cache masked a few bugs: * builtin/merge-recursive.c: didn't even bother loading the index. * builtin/stash.c: feels like a fake 'builtin' because it repeatedly invokes git subprocesses all over the place, mixed with other operations. In particular, invoking "git reset" will reset the index on disk, but the parent process that invoked it won't automatically have its in-memory index updated. * t3030-merge-recursive.h: this test has always been broken in that it didn't make sure to make index match head before running. But, it didn't care about the index or even the merge result, just the verbose output while running. While commit eddd1a411d93 ("merge-recursive: enforce rule that index matches head before merging", 2018-06-30) should have uncovered this broken test, it used a test_must_fail wrapper around the merge-recursive call because it was known that the merge resulted in a rename/rename conflict. Thus, that fix only made this test fail for a different reason, and since the index == head check didn't happen until after coming all the way back out of the recursion, the testcase had enough information to pass the one check that it did perform. So, load the index in builtin/merge-recursive.c, reload the in-memory index in builtin/stash.c, and modify the t3030 testcase to correctly setup the index and make sure that the test fails in the expected way (meaning it reports a rename/rename conflict). This makes sure that all callers actually make the index match head. The next commit will then enforce the condition that index matches head earlier so this problem doesn't return in the future. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-25Merge branch 'tg/stash-keep-index-with-removed-paths'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-23/+9
"git stash --keep-index" did not work correctly on paths that have been removed, which has been fixed. * tg/stash-keep-index-with-removed-paths: stash: fix handling removed files with --keep-index
2019-07-16stash: fix handling removed files with --keep-indexLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-23/+9
git stash push --keep-index is supposed to keep all changes that have been added to the index, both in the index and on disk. Currently this doesn't behave correctly when a file is removed from the index. Instead of keeping it deleted on disk, --keep-index currently restores the file. Fix that behaviour by using 'git checkout' in no-overlay mode which can faithfully restore the index and working tree. This also simplifies the code. Note that this will overwrite untracked files if the untracked file has the same name as a file that has been deleted in the index. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-19stash: fix show referencing stash indexLibravatar Thomas Gummerer1-4/+5
In the conversion of 'stash show' to C in dc7bd382b1 ("stash: convert show to builtin", 2019-02-25), 'git stash show <n>', where n is the index of a stash got broken, if n is not a file or a valid revision by itself. 'stash show' accepts any flag 'git diff' accepts for changing the output format. Internally we use 'setup_revisions()' to parse these command line flags. Currently we pass the whole argv through to 'setup_revisions()', which includes the stash index. As the stash index is not a valid revision or a file in the working tree in most cases however, this 'setup_revisions()' call (and thus the whole command) ends up failing if we use this form of 'git stash show'. Instead of passing the whole argv to 'setup_revisions()', only pass the flags (and the command name) through, while excluding the stash reference. The stash reference is parsed (and validated) in 'get_stash_info()' already. This separate parsing also means that we currently do produce the correct output if the command succeeds. Reported-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-25Merge branch 'jk/unused-params-even-more'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Code cleanup. * jk/unused-params-even-more: parse_opt_ref_sorting: always use with NONEG flag pretty: drop unused strbuf from parse_padding_placeholder() pretty: drop unused "type" parameter in needs_rfc2047_encoding() parse-options: drop unused ctx parameter from show_gitcomp() fetch_pack(): drop unused parameters report_path_error(): drop unused prefix parameter unpack-trees: drop unused error_type parameters unpack-trees: drop name_entry from traverse_by_cache_tree() test-date: drop unused "now" parameter from parse_dates() update-index: drop unused prefix_length parameter from do_reupdate() log: drop unused "len" from show_tagger() log: drop unused rev_info from early output revision: drop some unused "revs" parameters
2019-04-22Merge branch 'tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
A regression fix. * tg/stash-in-c-show-default-to-p-fix: stash: setup default diff output format if necessary
2019-04-22Merge branch 'js/stash-in-c-pathspec-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-31/+40
Further fixes to "git stash" reimplemented in C. * js/stash-in-c-pathspec-fix: stash: pass pathspec as pointer built-in stash: handle :(glob) pathspecs again legacy stash: fix "rudimentary backport of -q"