summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin/repack.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-02-05Merge branch 'tb/repack-fix-renames' (early part)Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Finishing touches to the "rewrite repack in C" series. * 'tb/repack-fix-renames' (early part): repack.c: rename and unlink pack file if it exists
2014-02-05repack.c: rename and unlink pack file if it existsLibravatar Torsten Bögershausen1-2/+2
When a repo was fully repacked, and is repacked again, we may run into the situation that "new" packfiles have the same name as already existing ones (traditionally packfiles have been named after the list of names of objects in them, so repacking all the objects in a single pack would have produced a packfile with the same name). The logic is to rename the existing ones into filename like "old-XXX", create the new ones and then remove the "old-" ones. When something went wrong in the middle, this sequence is rolled back by renaming the "old-" files back. The renaming into "old-" did not work as intended, because file_exists() was done on "XXX", not "pack-XXX". Also when rolling back the change, the code tried to rename "old-pack-XXX" but the saved ones are named "old-XXX", so this couldn't have worked. Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-27Merge branch 'sb/repack-in-c'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+12
"git repack --max-pack-size=8g" stopped being parsed correctly when the command was reimplemented in C. * sb/repack-in-c: repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings repack: make parsed string options const-correct repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option
2014-01-23repack: propagate pack-objects options as stringsLibravatar Jeff King1-11/+11
In the original shell version of git-repack, any options destined for pack-objects were left as strings, and passed as a whole. Since the C rewrite in commit a1bbc6c (repack: rewrite the shell script in C, 2013-09-15), we now parse these values to integers internally, then reformat the integers when passing the option to pack-objects. This has the advantage that we catch format errors earlier (i.e., when repack is invoked, rather than when pack-objects is invoked). It has three disadvantages, though: 1. Our internal data types may not be the right size. In the case of "--window-memory" and "--max-pack-size", these are "unsigned long" in pack-objects, but we can only represent a regular "int". 2. Our parsing routines might not be the same as those of pack-objects. For the two options above, pack-objects understands "100m" to mean "100 megabytes", but repack does not. 3. We have to keep a sentinel value to know whether it is worth passing the option along. In the case of "--window-memory", we currently do not pass it if the value is "0". But that is a meaningful value to pack-objects, where it overrides any configured value. We can fix all of these by simply passing the strings from the user along to pack-objects verbatim. This does not actually fix anything for "--depth" or "--window", but these are converted, too, for consistency. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-23repack: make parsed string options const-correctLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we use OPT_STRING to parse an option, we get back a pointer into the argv array, which should be "const char *". The compiler doesn't notice because it gets passed through a "void *" in the option struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-23repack: fix typo in max-pack-size optionLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we see "--max-pack-size", we accidentally propagated this to pack-objects as "--max_pack_size", which does not work at all. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-17Sync with 1.8.5.2Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+2
* maint: Git 1.8.5.2 cmd_repack(): remove redundant local variable "nr_packs"
2013-12-17cmd_repack(): remove redundant local variable "nr_packs"Libravatar Michael Haggerty1-4/+2
Its value is the same as the number of entries in the "names" string_list, so just use "names.nr" in its place. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Acked-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-05replace {pre,suf}fixcmp() with {starts,ends}_with()Libravatar Christian Couder1-1/+1
Leaving only the function definitions and declarations so that any new topic in flight can still make use of the old functions, replace existing uses of the prefixcmp() and suffixcmp() with new API functions. The change can be recreated by mechanically applying this: $ git grep -l -e prefixcmp -e suffixcmp -- \*.c | grep -v strbuf\\.c | xargs perl -pi -e ' s|!prefixcmp\(|starts_with\(|g; s|prefixcmp\(|!starts_with\(|g; s|!suffixcmp\(|ends_with\(|g; s|suffixcmp\(|!ends_with\(|g; ' on the result of preparatory changes in this series. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-17repack: improve warnings about failure of renaming and removing filesLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-17repack: retain the return value of pack-objectsLibravatar Stefan Beller1-2/+2
During the review process of the previous commit (repack: rewrite the shell script in C), Johannes Sixt proposed to retain any exit codes from the sub-process, which makes it probably more obvious in case of failure. As the commit before should behave as close to the original shell script, the proposed change is put in this extra commit. The infrastructure however was already setup in the previous commit. (Having a local 'ret' variable) Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-17repack: rewrite the shell script in CLibravatar Stefan Beller1-0/+387
The motivation of this patch is to get closer to a goal of being able to have a core subset of git functionality built in to git. That would mean * people on Windows could get a copy of at least the core parts of Git without having to install a Unix-style shell * people using git in on servers with chrooted environments do not need to worry about standard tools lacking for shell scripts. This patch is meant to be mostly a literal translation of the git-repack script; the intent is that later patches would start using more library facilities, but this patch is meant to be as close to a no-op as possible so it doesn't do that kind of thing. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>