summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin/merge.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2016-08-12Merge branch 'rs/merge-add-strategies-simplification'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-34/+10
A small code clean-up. * rs/merge-add-strategies-simplification: merge: use string_list_split() in add_strategies()
2016-08-05merge: use string_list_split() in add_strategies()Libravatar René Scharfe1-34/+10
Call string_list_split() for cutting a space separated list into pieces instead of reimplementing it based on struct strategy. The attr member of struct strategy was not used split_merge_strategies(); it was a pure string operation. Also be nice and clean up once we're done splitting; the old code didn't bother freeing any of the allocated memory. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-26prepare the builtins for a libified merge_recursive()Libravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+2
Previously, callers of merge_trees() or merge_recursive() expected that code to die() with an error message. This used to be okay because we called those commands from scripts, and had a chance to print out a message in case the command failed fatally (read: with exit code 128). As scripting incurs its own set of problems (portability, speed, idiosyncrasies of different shells, limited data structures leading to inefficient code), we are converting more and more of these scripts into builtins, using library functions directly. We already tried to use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin git-am, for example. Unfortunately, we had to roll it back temporarily because some of the code in merge-recursive.c still deemed it okay to call die(), when the builtin am code really wanted to print out a useful advice after the merge failed fatally. In the next commits, we want to fix that. The code touched by this commit expected merge_trees() to die() with some useful message when there is an error condition, but merge_trees() is going to be improved by converting all die() calls to return error() instead (i.e. return value -1 after printing out the message as before), so that the caller can react more flexibly. This is a step to prepare for the version of merge_trees() that no longer dies, even if we just imitate the previous behavior by calling exit(128): this is what callers of e.g. `git merge` have come to expect. Note that the callers of the sequencer (revert and cherry-pick) already fail fast even for the return value -1; The only difference is that they now get a chance to say "<command> failed". A caller of merge_trees() might want handle error messages themselves (or even suppress them). As this patch is already complex enough, we leave that change for a later patch. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-19Merge branch 'jk/write-file'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-40/+5
General code clean-up around a helper function to write a single-liner to a file. * jk/write-file: branch: use write_file_buf instead of write_file use write_file_buf where applicable write_file: add format attribute write_file: add pointer+len variant write_file: use xopen write_file: drop "gently" form branch: use non-gentle write_file for branch description am: ignore return value of write_file() config: fix bogus fd check when setting up default config
2016-07-19Merge branch 'bc/cocci'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+7
Conversion from unsigned char sha1[20] to struct object_id continues. * bc/cocci: diff: convert prep_temp_blob() to struct object_id merge-recursive: convert merge_recursive_generic() to object_id merge-recursive: convert leaf functions to use struct object_id merge-recursive: convert struct merge_file_info to object_id merge-recursive: convert struct stage_data to use object_id diff: rename struct diff_filespec's sha1_valid member diff: convert struct diff_filespec to struct object_id coccinelle: apply object_id Coccinelle transformations coccinelle: convert hashcpy() with null_sha1 to hashclr() contrib/coccinelle: add basic Coccinelle transforms hex: add oid_to_hex_r()
2016-07-08use write_file_buf where applicableLibravatar Jeff King1-40/+5
There are several places where we open a file, write some content from a strbuf, and close it. These can be simplified with write_file_buf(). As a bonus, many of these did not catch write problems at close() time. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28coccinelle: apply object_id Coccinelle transformationsLibravatar brian m. carlson1-7/+6
Apply the set of semantic patches from contrib/coccinelle to convert some leftover places using struct object_id's hash member to instead use the wrapper functions that take struct object_id natively. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28coccinelle: convert hashcpy() with null_sha1 to hashclr()Libravatar brian m. carlson1-1/+1
hashcpy with null_sha1 as the source is equivalent to hashclr. In addition to being simpler, using hashclr may give the compiler a chance to optimize better. Convert instances of hashcpy with the source argument of null_sha1 to hashclr. This transformation was implemented using the following semantic patch: @@ expression E1; @@ -hashcpy(E1, null_sha1); +hashclr(E1); Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17i18n: merge: change command option help to lowercaseLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-1/+1
Change command option description to lowercase, matching pull counterpart option. Translators would have to translate such message only once. Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17i18n: merge: mark messages for translationLibravatar Vasco Almeida1-5/+5
Mark messages shown to the user for translation. Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-25Merge branch 'en/merge-trivial-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+8
When "git merge" notices that the merge can be resolved purely at the tree level (without having to merge blobs) and the resulting tree happens to already exist in the object store, it forgot to update the index, which lead to an inconsistent state for later operations. * en/merge-trivial-fix: builtin/merge.c: fix a bug with trivial merges t7605: add a testcase demonstrating a bug with trivial merges
2016-04-25Merge branch 'dt/pre-refs-backend'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Code restructuring around the "refs" area to prepare for pluggable refs backends. * dt/pre-refs-backend: (24 commits) refs: on symref reflog expire, lock symref not referrent refs: move resolve_ref_unsafe into common code show_head_ref(): check the result of resolve_ref_namespace() check_aliased_update(): check that dst_name is non-NULL checkout_paths(): remove unneeded flag variable cmd_merge(): remove unneeded flag variable fsck_head_link(): remove unneeded flag variable read_raw_ref(): change flags parameter to unsigned int files-backend: inline resolve_ref_1() into resolve_ref_unsafe() read_raw_ref(): manage own scratch space files-backend: break out ref reading resolve_ref_1(): eliminate local variable "bad_name" resolve_ref_1(): reorder code resolve_ref_1(): eliminate local variable resolve_ref_unsafe(): ensure flags is always set resolve_ref_unsafe(): use for loop to count up to MAXDEPTH resolve_missing_loose_ref(): simplify semantics t1430: improve test coverage of deletion of badly-named refs t1430: test for-each-ref in the presence of badly-named refs t1430: don't rely on symbolic-ref for creating broken symrefs ...
2016-04-12builtin/merge.c: fix a bug with trivial mergesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+8
If read_tree_trivial() succeeds and produces a tree that is already in the object store, then the index is not written to disk, leaving it out-of-sync with both HEAD and the working tree. In order to write the index back out to disk after a merge, write_index_locked() needs to be called. For most merge strategies, this is done from try_merge_strategy(). For fast forward updates, this is done from checkout_fast_forward(). When trivial merges work, the call to write_index_locked() is buried a little deeper: merge_trivial() -> write_tree_trivial() -> write_cache_as_tree() -> write_index_as_tree() -> write_locked_index() However, it is only called when !cache_tree_fully_valid(), which is how this bug is triggered. But that also shows why this bug doesn't affect any other merge strategies or cases. Add a direct call to write_index_locked() from merge_trivial() to fix this issue. Since the indirect call to write_locked_index() was conditional on cache_tree_fully_valid(), it won't be written twice. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-10cmd_merge(): remove unneeded flag variableLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-2/+2
It is never read, so we can pass NULL to resolve_ref_unsafe(). Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-08Merge branch 'jc/merge-refuse-new-root'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+9
"git merge" used to allow merging two branches that have no common base by default, which led to a brand new history of an existing project created and then get pulled by an unsuspecting maintainer, which allowed an unnecessary parallel history merged into the existing project. The command has been taught not to allow this by default, with an escape hatch "--allow-unrelated-histories" option to be used in a rare event that merges histories of two projects that started their lives independently. * jc/merge-refuse-new-root: merge: refuse to create too cool a merge by default
2016-04-06Merge branch 'jv/merge-nothing-into-void'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
"git merge FETCH_HEAD" dereferenced NULL pointer when merging nothing into an unborn history (which is arguably unusual usage, which perhaps was the reason why nobody noticed it). * jv/merge-nothing-into-void: merge: fix NULL pointer dereference when merging nothing into void
2016-04-03Merge branch 'mm/diff-renames-default'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
The end-user facing Porcelain level commands like "diff" and "log" now enables the rename detection by default. * mm/diff-renames-default: diff: activate diff.renames by default log: introduce init_log_defaults() t: add tests for diff.renames (true/false/unset) t4001-diff-rename: wrap file creations in a test Documentation/diff-config: fix description of diff.renames
2016-03-23merge: refuse to create too cool a merge by defaultLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+9
While it makes sense to allow merging unrelated histories of two projects that started independently into one, in the way "gitk" was merged to "git" itself aka "the coolest merge ever", such a merge is still an unusual event. Worse, if somebody creates an independent history by starting from a tarball of an established project and sends a pull request to the original project, "git merge" however happily creates such a merge without any sign of something unusual is happening. Teach "git merge" to refuse to create such a merge by default, unless the user passes a new "--allow-unrelated-histories" option to tell it that the user is aware that two unrelated projects are merged. Because such a "two project merge" is a rare event, a configuration option to always allow such a merge is not added. We could add the same option to "git pull" and have it passed through to underlying "git merge". I do not have a fundamental opposition against such a feature, but this commit does not do so and instead leaves it as low-hanging fruit for others, because such a "two project merge" would be done after fetching the other project into some location in the working tree of an existing project and making sure how well they fit together, it is sufficient to allow a local merge without such an option pass-through from "git pull" to "git merge". Many tests that are updated by this patch does the pass-through manually by turning: git pull something into its equivalent: git fetch something && git merge --allow-unrelated-histories FETCH_HEAD If somebody is inclined to add such an option, updated tests in this change need to be adjusted back to: git pull --allow-unrelated-histories something Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-03-23merge: fix NULL pointer dereference when merging nothing into voidLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
When we are on an unborn branch and merging only one foreign parent, we allow "git merge" to fast-forward to that foreign parent commit. This codepath incorrectly attempted to dereference the list of parents that the merge is going to record even when the list is empty. It must refuse to operate instead when there is no parent. All other codepaths make sure the list is not empty before they dereference it, and are safe. Reported-by: Jose Ivan B. Vilarouca Filho Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-25diff: activate diff.renames by defaultLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-0/+1
Rename detection is a very convenient feature, and new users shouldn't have to dig in the documentation to benefit from it. Potential objections to activating rename detection are that it sometimes fail, and it is sometimes slow. But rename detection is already activated by default in several cases like "git status" and "git merge", so activating diff.renames does not fundamentally change the situation. When the rename detection fails, it now fails consistently between "git diff" and "git status". This setting does not affect plumbing commands, hence well-written scripts will not be affected. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-22use st_add and st_mult for allocation size computationLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
If our size computation overflows size_t, we may allocate a much smaller buffer than we expected and overflow it. It's probably impossible to trigger an overflow in most of these sites in practice, but it is easy enough convert their additions and multiplications into overflow-checking variants. This may be fixing real bugs, and it makes auditing the code easier. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-01-13merge: release pack files before garbage-collectingLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+1
Before auto-gc'ing, we need to make sure that the pack files are released in case they need to be repacked and garbage-collected. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-20Remove get_object_hash.Libravatar brian m. carlson1-25/+25
Convert all instances of get_object_hash to use an appropriate reference to the hash member of the oid member of struct object. This provides no functional change, as it is essentially a macro substitution. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-20Convert struct object to object_idLibravatar brian m. carlson1-5/+5
struct object is one of the major data structures dealing with object IDs. Convert it to use struct object_id instead of an unsigned char array. Convert get_object_hash to refer to the new member as well. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-11-20Add several uses of get_object_hash.Libravatar brian m. carlson1-27/+27
Convert most instances where the sha1 member of struct object is dereferenced to use get_object_hash. Most instances that are passed to functions that have versions taking struct object_id, such as get_sha1_hex/get_oid_hex, or instances that can be trivially converted to use struct object_id instead, are not converted. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-10-30Merge branch 'rs/pop-commit'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+5
Code simplification. * rs/pop-commit: use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_list
2015-10-26Merge branch 'tk/stripspace'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The internal stripspace() function has been moved to where it logically belongs to, i.e. strbuf API, and the command line parser of "git stripspace" has been updated to use the parse_options API. * tk/stripspace: stripspace: use parse-options for command-line parsing strbuf: make stripspace() part of strbuf
2015-10-26use pop_commit() for consuming the first entry of a struct commit_listLibravatar René Scharfe1-7/+5
Instead of open-coding the function pop_commit() just call it. This makes the intent clearer and reduces code size. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-16strbuf: make stripspace() part of strbufLibravatar Tobias Klauser1-1/+1
This function is also used in other builtins than stripspace, so it makes sense to have it in a more generic place. Since it operates on an strbuf and the function is declared in strbuf.h, move it to strbuf.c and add the corresponding prefix to its name, just like other API functions in the strbuf_* family. Also switch all current users of stripspace() to the new function name and keep a temporary wrapper inline function for any topic branches still using stripspace(). Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-05use sha1_to_hex_r() instead of strcpyLibravatar Jeff King1-10/+10
Before sha1_to_hex_r() existed, a simple way to get hex sha1 into a buffer was with: strcpy(buf, sha1_to_hex(sha1)); This isn't wrong (assuming the buf is 41 characters), but it makes auditing the code base for bad strcpy() calls harder, as these become false positives. Let's convert them to sha1_to_hex_r(), and likewise for some calls to find_unique_abbrev(). While we're here, we'll double-check that all of the buffers are correctly sized, and use the more obvious GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ constant. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-10memoize common git-path "constant" filesLibravatar Jeff King1-15/+15
One of the most common uses of git_path() is to pass a constant, like git_path("MERGE_MSG"). This has two drawbacks: 1. The return value is a static buffer, and the lifetime is dependent on other calls to git_path, etc. 2. There's no compile-time checking of the pathname. This is OK for a one-off (after all, we have to spell it correctly at least once), but many of these constant strings appear throughout the code. This patch introduces a series of functions to "memoize" these strings, which are essentially globals for the lifetime of the program. We compute the value once, take ownership of the buffer, and return the cached value for subsequent calls. cache.h provides a helper macro for defining these functions as one-liners, and defines a few common ones for global use. Using a macro is a little bit gross, but it does nicely document the purpose of the functions. If we need to touch them all later (e.g., because we learned how to change the git_dir variable at runtime, and need to invalidate all of the stored values), it will be much easier to have the complete list. Note that the shared-global functions have separate, manual declarations. We could do something clever with the macros (e.g., expand it to a declaration in some places, and a declaration _and_ a definition in path.c). But there aren't that many, and it's probably better to stay away from too-magical macros. Likewise, if we abandon the C preprocessor in favor of generating these with a script, we could get much fancier. E.g., normalizing "FOO/BAR-BAZ" into "git_path_foo_bar_baz". But the small amount of saved typing is probably not worth the resulting confusion to readers who want to grep for the function's definition. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-05Merge branch 'jk/at-push-sha1'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Introduce <branch>@{push} short-hand to denote the remote-tracking branch that tracks the branch at the remote the <branch> would be pushed to. * jk/at-push-sha1: for-each-ref: accept "%(push)" format for-each-ref: use skip_prefix instead of starts_with sha1_name: implement @{push} shorthand sha1_name: refactor interpret_upstream_mark sha1_name: refactor upstream_mark remote.c: add branch_get_push remote.c: return upstream name from stat_tracking_info remote.c: untangle error logic in branch_get_upstream remote.c: report specific errors from branch_get_upstream remote.c: introduce branch_get_upstream helper remote.c: hoist read_config into remote_get_1 remote.c: provide per-branch pushremote name remote.c: hoist branch.*.remote lookup out of remote_get_1 remote.c: drop "remote" pointer from "struct branch" remote.c: refactor setup of branch->merge list remote.c: drop default_remote_name variable
2015-05-21remote.c: drop "remote" pointer from "struct branch"Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When we create each branch struct, we fill in the "remote_name" field from the config, and then fill in the actual "remote" field (with a "struct remote") based on that name. However, it turns out that nobody really cares about the latter field. The only two sites that access it at all are: 1. git-merge, which uses it to notice when the branch does not have a remote defined. But we can easily replace this with looking at remote_name instead. 2. remote.c itself, when setting up the @{upstream} merge config. But we don't need to save the "remote" in the "struct branch" for that; we can just look it up for the duration of the operation. So there is no need to have both fields; they are redundant with each other (the struct remote contains the name, or you can look up the struct from the name). It would be nice to simplify this, especially as we are going to add matching pushremote config in a future patch (and it would be nice to keep them consistent). So which one do we keep and which one do we get rid of? If we had a lot of callers accessing the struct, it would be more efficient to keep it (since you have to do a lookup to go from the name to the struct, but not vice versa). But we don't have a lot of callers; we have exactly one, so efficiency doesn't matter. We can decide this based on simplicity and readability. And the meaning of the struct value is somewhat unclear. Is it always the remote matching remote_name? If remote_name is NULL (i.e., no per-branch config), does the struct fall back to the "origin" remote, or is it also NULL? These questions will get even more tricky with pushremotes, whose fallback behavior is more complicated. So let's just store the name, which pretty clearly represents the branch.*.remote config. Any lookup or fallback behavior can then be implemented in helper functions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-19Merge branch 'jc/merge'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-87/+161
"git merge FETCH_HEAD" learned that the previous "git fetch" could be to create an Octopus merge, i.e. recording multiple branches that are not marked as "not-for-merge"; this allows us to lose an old style invocation "git merge <msg> HEAD $commits..." in the implementation of "git pull" script; the old style syntax can now be deprecated. * jc/merge: merge: deprecate 'git merge <message> HEAD <commit>' syntax merge: handle FETCH_HEAD internally merge: decide if we auto-generate the message early in collect_parents() merge: make collect_parents() auto-generate the merge message merge: extract prepare_merge_message() logic out merge: narrow scope of merge_names merge: split reduce_parents() out of collect_parents() merge: clarify collect_parents() logic merge: small leakfix and code simplification merge: do not check argc to determine number of remote heads merge: clarify "pulling into void" special case t5520: test pulling an octopus into an unborn branch t5520: style fixes merge: simplify code flow merge: test the top-level merge driver
2015-04-29merge: deprecate 'git merge <message> HEAD <commit>' syntaxLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
We had this in "git merge" manual for eternity: 'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>... [This] syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for historical reasons. Do not use it from the command line or in new scripts. It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`. With the update to "git merge" to make it understand what is recorded in FETCH_HEAD directly, including Octopus merge cases, we now can rewrite the use of this syntax in "git pull" with a simple "git merge FETCH_HEAD". Also there are quite a few fallouts in the test scripts, and it turns out that "git cvsimport" also uses this old syntax to record a merge. Judging from this result, I would not be surprised if dropping the support of the old syntax broke scripts people have written and been relying on for the past ten years. But at least we can start the deprecation process by throwing a warning message when the syntax is used. With luck, we might be able to drop the support in a few years. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: handle FETCH_HEAD internallyLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-34/+72
The collect_parents() function now is responsible for 1. parsing the commits given on the command line into a list of commits to be merged; 2. filtering these parents into independent ones; and 3. optionally calling fmt_merge_msg() via prepare_merge_message() to prepare an auto-generated merge log message, using fake contents that FETCH_HEAD would have had if these commits were fetched from the current repository with "git pull . $args..." Make "git merge FETCH_HEAD" to be the same as the traditional git merge "$(git fmt-merge-msg <.git/FETCH_HEAD)" $commits invocation of the command in "git pull", where $commits are the ones that appear in FETCH_HEAD that are not marked as not-for-merge, by making it do a bit more, specifically: - noticing "FETCH_HEAD" is the only "commit" on the command line and picking the commits that are not marked as not-for-merge as the list of commits to be merged (substitute for step #1 above); - letting the resulting list fed to step #2 above; - doing the step #3 above, using the contents of the FETCH_HEAD instead of fake contents crafted from the list of commits parsed in the step #1 above. Note that this changes the semantics. "git merge FETCH_HEAD" has always behaved as if the first commit in the FETCH_HEAD file were directly specified on the command line, creating a two-way merge whose auto-generated merge log said "merge commit xyz". With this change, if the previous fetch was to grab multiple branches (e.g. "git fetch $there topic-a topic-b"), the new world order is to create an octopus, behaving as if "git pull $there topic-a topic-b" were run. This is a deliberate change to make that happen, and can be seen in the changes to t3033 tests. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: decide if we auto-generate the message early in collect_parents()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+9
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: make collect_parents() auto-generate the merge messageLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-14/+22
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: extract prepare_merge_message() logic outLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+15
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: narrow scope of merge_namesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+7
In order to pass the list of parents to fmt_merge_msg(), cmd_merge() uses this strbuf to create something that look like FETCH_HEAD that describes commits that are being merged. This is necessary only when we are creating the merge commit message ourselves, but was done unconditionally. Move the variable and the logic to populate it to confine them in a block that needs them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: split reduce_parents() out of collect_parents()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-16/+25
The latter does two separate things: - Parse the list of commits on the command line, and formulate the list of commits to be merged (including the current HEAD); - Compute the list of parents to be recorded in the resulting merge commit. Split the latter into a separate helper function, so that we can later supply the list commits to be merged from a different source (namely, FETCH_HEAD). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: clarify collect_parents() logicLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
Clarify this small function in three ways. - The function initially collects all commits to be merged into a commit_list "remoteheads"; the "remotes" pointer always points at the tail of this list (either the remoteheads variable itself, or the ->next slot of the element at the end of the list) to help elongate the list by repeated calls to commit_list_insert(). Because the new element appended by commit_list_insert() will always have its ->next slot NULLed out, there is no need for us to assign NULL to *remotes to terminate the list at the end. - The variable "head_subsumed" always confused me every time I read this code. What is happening here is that we inspect what the caller told us to merge (including the current HEAD) and come up with the list of parents to be recorded for the resulting merge commit, omitting commits that are ancestor of other commits. This filtering may remove the current HEAD from the resulting parent list---and we signal that fact with this variable, so that we can later record it as the first parent when "--no-ff" is in effect. - The "parents" list is created for this function by reduce_heads() and was not deallocated after its use, even though the loop control was written in such a way to allow us to do so by taking the "next" element in a separate variable so that it can be used in the next-step part of the loop control. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: small leakfix and code simplificationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
When parsing a merged object name like "foo~20" to formulate a merge summary "Merge branch foo (early part)", a temporary strbuf is used, but we forgot to deallocate it when we failed to find the named branch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: do not check argc to determine number of remote headsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
To reject merging multiple commits into an unborn branch, we check argc, thinking that collect_parents() that reads the remaining command line arguments from <argc, argv> will give us the same number of commits as its input, i.e. argc. Because what we really care about is the number of commits, let the function run and then make sure it returns only one commit instead. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: clarify "pulling into void" special caseLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-17/+18
Instead of having it as one of the three if/elseif/.. case arms, test the condition and handle this special case upfront. This makes it easier to follow the flow of logic. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-29merge: simplify code flowLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-8/+8
One of the first things cmd_merge() does is to see if the "--abort" option is given and run "reset --merge" and exit. When the control reaches this point, we know "--abort" was not given. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-16Revert "merge: pass verbosity flag down to merge-recursive"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+0
This reverts commit 2bf15a3330a26183adc8563dbeeacc11294b8a01, whose intention was good, but the verbosity levels used in merge-recursive turns out to be rather uneven. For example, a merge of two branches with conflicting submodule updates used to report CONFLICT: output with --quiet but no longer (which *is* desired), while the final "Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit" message is still shown even with --quiet (which *is* inconsistent). Originally reported by Bryan Turner; it is too early to declare what the concensus is, but it seems that we would need to level the verbosity levels used in merge strategy backends before we can go forward. In the meantime, we'd revert to the old behaviour until that happens. cf. $gmane/267245
2015-04-14Merge branch 'jk/merge-quiet'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
"git merge --quiet" did not squelch messages from the underlying merge-recursive strategy. * jk/merge-quiet: merge: pass verbosity flag down to merge-recursive
2015-04-02merge: pass verbosity flag down to merge-recursiveLibravatar Jeff King1-0/+4
This makes "git merge --quiet" really quiet when we call into merge-recursive. Note that we can't just pass our flag down as-is; the two parts of the code use different scales. We center at "0" as normal for git-merge (with "--quiet" giving a negative value), but merge-recursive uses "2" as its center. This patch passes a negative value to merge-recursive rather than "1", though, as otherwise the user would have to use "-qqq" to squelch all messages (but the downside is that the user cannot distinguish between levels 0-2 if without resorting to the GIT_MERGE_VERBOSITY variable). We may want to review and renormalize the message severities in merge-recursive, but that does not have to happen now. This is at least in improvement in the sense that we are respecting "--quiet" at all. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-14standardize usage info string formatLibravatar Alex Henrie1-2/+2
This patch puts the usage info strings that were not already in docopt- like format into docopt-like format, which will be a litle easier for end users and a lot easier for translators. Changes include: - Placing angle brackets around fill-in-the-blank parameters - Putting dashes in multiword parameter names - Adding spaces to [-f|--foobar] to make [-f | --foobar] - Replacing <foobar>* with [<foobar>...] Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>