summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin/add.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-07-15parse_pathspec: accept :(icase)path syntaxLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-2/+4
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15pathspec: support :(glob) syntaxLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-2/+7
:(glob)path differs from plain pathspec that it uses wildmatch with WM_PATHNAME while the other uses fnmatch without FNM_PATHNAME. The difference lies in how '*' (and '**') is processed. With the introduction of :(glob) and :(literal) and their global options --[no]glob-pathspecs, the user can: - make everything literal by default via --noglob-pathspecs --literal-pathspecs cannot be used for this purpose as it disables _all_ pathspec magic. - individually turn on globbing with :(glob) - make everything globbing by default via --glob-pathspecs - individually turn off globbing with :(literal) The implication behind this is, there is no way to gain the default matching behavior (i.e. fnmatch without FNM_PATHNAME). You either get new globbing or literal. The old fnmatch behavior is considered deprecated and discouraged to use. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15pathspec: support :(literal) syntax for noglob pathspecLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15remove match_pathspec() in favor of match_pathspec_depth()Libravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-16/+14
match_pathspec_depth was created to replace match_pathspec (see 61cf282 (pathspec: add match_pathspec_depth() - 2010-12-15). It took more than two years, but the replacement finally happens :-) Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15convert add_files_to_cache to take struct pathspecLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-4/+7
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15convert {read,fill}_directory to take struct pathspecLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+3
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15convert refresh_index to take struct pathspecLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-8/+7
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15convert run_add_interactive to use struct pathspecLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-16/+10
This passes the pathspec, more or less unmodified, to git-add--interactive. The command itself does not process pathspec. It simply passes the pathspec to other builtin commands. So if all those commands support pathspec, we're good. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15add: convert to use parse_pathspecLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-58/+45
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-26Merge branch 'jc/add-ignore-removal'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+17
Introduce "--ignore-removal" as a synonym to "--no-all" for "git add", and improve the 2.0 migration warning with it. * jc/add-ignore-removal: git add: rephrase -A/--no-all warning git add: --ignore-removal is a better named --no-all
2013-04-26Merge branch 'jc/warn-pathless-add-finishing-touches'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
* jc/warn-pathless-add-finishing-touches: git add: avoid "-u/-A without pathspec" warning on stat-dirty paths
2013-04-26git add: avoid "-u/-A without pathspec" warning on stat-dirty pathsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
In preparation for Git 2.0, "git add -u/-A" without pathspec checks all the working tree (not limited to the current directory) and issues a warning when it finds any path that we might add in Git 2.0, because that would mean the users' fingers need to be trained to explicitly say "." if they want to keep the current behaviour. However, the check was incomplete, because "git add" usually does not refresh the index, considers a path that is stat-dirty but has contents that is otherwise up-to-date in the index as "we might add", and relies on that it is a no-op to add the same thing again via the add_file_to_index() API (which also knows not to say "added" in verbose mode when this happens). We do not want to trigger the warning for a path that is outside the current directory is merely stat-dirty, as it won't be added in Git 2.0, either. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
2013-04-23Merge branch 'kb/status-ignored-optim-2'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+1
Fixes a handful of issues in the code to traverse working tree to find untracked and/or ignored files, cleans up and optimizes the codepath in general. * kb/status-ignored-optim-2: dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree twice dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree three times dir.c: git-status: avoid is_excluded checks for tracked files dir.c: replace is_path_excluded with now equivalent is_excluded API dir.c: unify is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs dir.c: move prep_exclude dir.c: factor out parts of last_exclude_matching for later reuse dir.c: git-clean -d -X: don't delete tracked directories dir.c: make 'git-status --ignored' work within leading directories dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty directories as ignored dir.c: git-ls-files --directories: don't hide empty directories dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty ignored directories dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list files in ignored directories dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't drop ignored directories
2013-04-22git add: rephrase -A/--no-all warningLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+6
Now we have a synonym --ignore-removal for --no-all, we can rephrase the Git 2.0 transition warning message in a more natural way. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-22git add: --ignore-removal is a better named --no-allLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
In the historical context of "git add --all ." that pays attention to "all kinds of changes" (implying "without ignoring removals"), the option to countermand it "--no-all" may have made sense, but because we will be making "--all" the default when a pathspec is given, it makes more sense to rename the option to a more explicit "--ignore-removal". The "--all" option naturally becomes its negation, "--no-ignore-removal". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-22Merge branch 'jc/add-2.0-delete-default' (early part)Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-28/+87
Preparatory steps to make "git add <pathspec>" take notice of removed paths that match <pathspec> by default in Git 2.0. * 'jc/add-2.0-delete-default' (early part): git add: rephrase the "removal will cease to be ignored" warning git add: rework the logic to warn "git add <pathspec>..." default change git add: start preparing for "git add <pathspec>..." to default to "-A" builtin/add.c: simplify boolean variables
2013-04-21git add: rephrase the "removal will cease to be ignored" warningLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+14
Now the logic to decide when to warn has been tightened, we know the user is in a situation where the current and future behaviours will be different. Spell out what happens with these two versions and how to explicitly ask for the behaviour, and suggest "git status" as a way to inspect the current status. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-17git add: rework the logic to warn "git add <pathspec>..." default changeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-26/+38
The earlier logic to warn against "git add subdir" that is run without "-A" or "--no-all" was only to check any <pathspec> given exactly spells a directory name that (still) exists on the filesystem. This had number of problems: * "git add '*dir'" (note that the wildcard is hidden from the shell) would not trigger the warning. * "git add '*.py'" would behave differently between the current version of Git and Git 2.0 for the same reason as "subdir", but would not trigger the warning. * "git add dir" for a submodule "dir" would just update the index entry for the submodule "dir" without ever recursing into it, and use of "-A" or "--no-all" would matter. But the logic only checks the directory-ness of "dir" and gives an unnecessary warning. Rework the logic to detect the case where the behaviour will be different in Git 2.0, and issue a warning only when it matters. Even with the code before this warning, "git add subdir" will have to traverse the directory in order to find _new_ files the index does not know about _anyway_, so we can do this check without adding an extra pass to find if <pathspec> matches any removed file. This essentially updates the "add_files_to_cache()" public API to "update_files_in_cache()" API that is internal to "git add", because with the "--all" option, the function is no longer about "adding" paths to the cache, but is also used to remove them. There are other callers of the former from "checkout" (used when "checkout -m" prepares the temporary tree that represents the local modifications to be merged) and "commit" ("commit --include" that picks up local changes in addition to what is in the index). Since ADD_CACHE_IGNORE_ERRORS (aka "--no-all") is not used by either of them, once dust settles after Git 2.0 and the warning becomes unnecessary, we may want to unify these two functions again. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-15dir.c: replace is_path_excluded with now equivalent is_excluded APILibravatar Karsten Blees1-4/+1
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-03add -A: only show pathless 'add -A' warning when changes exist outside cwdLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-5/+16
In the spirit of the recent similar change for 'git add -u', avoid pestering users that restrict their attention to a subdirectory and will not be affected by the coming change in the behavior of pathless 'git add -A'. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-03add -u: only show pathless 'add -u' warning when changes exist outside cwdLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-4/+37
A common workflow in large projects is to chdir into a subdirectory of interest and only do work there: cd src vi foo.c make test git add -u git commit The upcoming change to 'git add -u' behavior would not affect such a workflow: when the only changes present are in the current directory, 'git add -u' will add all changes, and whether that happens via an implicit "." or implicit ":/" parameter is an unimportant implementation detail. The warning about use of 'git add -u' with no pathspec is annoying because it seemingly serves no purpose in this case. So suppress the warning unless there are changes outside the cwd that are not being added. A previous version of this patch ran two I/O-intensive diff-files passes: one to find changes outside the cwd, and another to find changes to add to the index within the cwd. This version runs one full-tree diff and decides for each change whether to add it or warn and suppress it in update_callback. As a result, even on very large repositories "git add -u" will not be significantly slower than the future default behavior ("git add -u :/"), and the slowdown relative to "git add -u ." should be a useful clue to users of such repositories to get into the habit of explicitly passing '.'. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Improved-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-03add: make warn_pathless_add() a no-op after first callLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+5
Make warn_pathless_add() print its warning the first time it is called and do nothing if called again. This will make it easier to show the warning on the fly when a relevant condition is detected without risking showing it multiple times when multiple such conditions hold. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-03add: add a blank line at the end of pathless 'add [-u|-A]' warningLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+3
When the commands give an actual output (e.g. when ran with -v), the output is visually mixed with the warning. An additional blank line makes the actual output more visible. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-20add: make pathless 'add [-u|-A]' warning a file-global functionLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-33/+36
Currently warn_pathless_add() is only called directly by cmd_add(), but that is about to change. Move its definition higher in the file and pass the "--update" or "--all" option name used in its message through globals instead of function arguments to make it easier to call without passing values that will not change through the call chain. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-11add: update pathless 'add [-u|-A]' warning to reflect change of planLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-3/+3
We originally thought the transition would need a period where "git add [-u|-A]" without pathspec would be forbidden, but the warning is big enough to scare people and teach them not to use it (or, if so, to understand the consequences). Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-08git add: start preparing for "git add <pathspec>..." to default to "-A"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+43
When "git add subdir/" is run without "-u" or "-A" option, e.g. $ edit subdir/x $ create subdir/y $ rm subdir/z $ git add subdir/ the command does not notice removal of paths (e.g. subdir/z) from the working tree. This sometimes confuses new people, as arguably "git add" is told to record the current state of "subdir/" as a whole, not the current state of the paths that exist in the working tree that matches that pathspec (the latter by definition excludes the state of "subdir/z" because it does not exist in the working tree). Plan to eventually make "git add" pretend as if "-A" is given when there is a pathspec on the command line. When resolving a conflict to remove a path, the current code tells you to "git rm $path", but with such a change, you will be able to say "git add $path" (of course you can do "git add -A $path" today). That means that we can simplify the advice messages given by "git status". That all will be in Git 2.0 or later, if we are going to do so. For that transition to work, people need to learn either to say "git add --no-all subdir/" when they want to ignore the removed paths like "subdir/z", or to say "git add -A subdir/" when they want to take the state of the directory as a whole. "git add" without any argument will continue to be a no-op. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-08builtin/add.c: simplify boolean variablesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+11
Do not to explicitly initialize static variables to 0 and instead let BSS take care of it. Also use OPT_BOOL() to let the command line arguments set these variables to 0 or 1, instead of the deprecated OPT_BOOLEAN() aka OPT_COUNTUP(). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-12Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Replace filepattern with pathspec for consistency
2013-02-12Replace filepattern with pathspec for consistencyLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
pathspec is the most widely used term, and is the one defined in gitglossary.txt. <filepattern> was used only in the synopsys for git-add and git-commit, and in git-add.txt. Get rid of it. This patch is obtained with by running: perl -pi -e 's/filepattern/pathspec/' `git grep -l filepattern` Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-04Merge branch 'mm/add-u-A-sans-pathspec'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+43
Forbid "git add -u" and "git add -A" without pathspec run from a subdirectory, to train people to type "." (or ":/") to make the choice of default does not matter. * mm/add-u-A-sans-pathspec: add: warn when -u or -A is used without pathspec
2013-01-28add: warn when -u or -A is used without pathspecLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+43
Most Git commands that can be used with or without pathspec operate tree-wide by default, the pathspec being used to restrict their scope. A few exceptions are: 'git grep', 'git clean', 'git add -u' and 'git add -A'. When run in a subdirectory without pathspec, they operate only on paths in the current directory. The inconsistency of 'git add -u' and 'git add -A' is particularly problematic since other 'git add' subcommands (namely 'git add -p' and 'git add -e') are tree-wide by default. It also means that "git add -u && git commit" will record a state that is different from what is recorded with "git commit -a". Flipping the default now is unacceptable, so let's start training users to type 'git add -u|-A :/' or 'git add -u|-A .' explicitly, to prepare for the next steps: * forbid 'git add -u|-A' without pathspec (like 'git add' without option) * much later, maybe, re-allow 'git add -u|-A' without pathspec, that will add all tracked and modified files, or all files, tree-wide. A nice side effect of this patch is that it makes the :/ magic pathspec easier to discover for users. When the command is called from the root of the tree, there is no ambiguity and no need to change the behavior, hence no need to warn. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-23Merge branch 'as/check-ignore'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-60/+18
Add a new command "git check-ignore" for debugging .gitignore files. The variable names may want to get cleaned up but that can be done in-tree. * as/check-ignore: clean.c, ls-files.c: respect encapsulation of exclude_list_groups t0008: avoid brace expansion add git-check-ignore sub-command setup.c: document get_pathspec() add.c: extract new die_if_path_beyond_symlink() for reuse add.c: extract check_path_for_gitlink() from treat_gitlinks() for reuse pathspec.c: rename newly public functions for clarity add.c: move pathspec matchers into new pathspec.c for reuse add.c: remove unused argument from validate_pathspec() dir.c: improve docs for match_pathspec() and match_pathspec_depth() dir.c: provide clear_directory() for reclaiming dir_struct memory dir.c: keep track of where patterns came from dir.c: use a single struct exclude_list per source of excludes Conflicts: builtin/ls-files.c dir.c
2013-01-10Merge branch 'as/dir-c-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Refactor and generally clean up the directory traversal API implementation. * as/dir-c-cleanup: dir.c: rename free_excludes() to clear_exclude_list() dir.c: refactor is_path_excluded() dir.c: refactor is_excluded() dir.c: refactor is_excluded_from_list() dir.c: rename excluded() to is_excluded() dir.c: rename excluded_from_list() to is_excluded_from_list() dir.c: rename path_excluded() to is_path_excluded() dir.c: rename cryptic 'which' variable to more consistent name Improve documentation and comments regarding directory traversal API api-directory-listing.txt: update to match code
2013-01-06add.c: extract new die_if_path_beyond_symlink() for reuseLibravatar Adam Spiers1-4/+6
This will be reused by a new git check-ignore command. Also document validate_pathspec(). Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-06add.c: extract check_path_for_gitlink() from treat_gitlinks() for reuseLibravatar Adam Spiers1-18/+6
Extract the body of the for loop in treat_gitlinks() into a separate check_path_for_gitlink() function so that it can be reused elsewhere. This paves the way for a new check-ignore sub-command. Also document treat_gitlinks(). Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-06pathspec.c: rename newly public functions for clarityLibravatar Adam Spiers1-2/+2
Perform the following function renames to make it explicit that these pathspec handling functions are for matching against the index, rather than against a tree or the working directory. - fill_pathspec_matches() -> add_pathspec_matches_against_index() - find_used_pathspec() -> find_pathspecs_matching_against_index() Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-06add.c: move pathspec matchers into new pathspec.c for reuseLibravatar Adam Spiers1-33/+1
Extract the following functions from builtin/add.c to pathspec.c, in preparation for reuse by a new git check-ignore command: - fill_pathspec_matches() - find_used_pathspec() The functions being extracted are not changed in any way, except removal of the 'static' qualifier. Also add comments documenting these newly public functions, including clarifications that they operate on the index. Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-06add.c: remove unused argument from validate_pathspec()Libravatar Adam Spiers1-3/+3
The 'argc' argument passed to validate_pathspec() was never used. Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-28dir.c: rename path_excluded() to is_path_excluded()Libravatar Adam Spiers1-1/+1
Start adopting clearer names for exclude functions. This 'is_*' naming pattern for functions returning booleans was agreed here: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/204661/focus=204924 Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-14Merge branch 'rj/path-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
* rj/path-cleanup: Call mkpathdup() rather than xstrdup(mkpath(...)) Call git_pathdup() rather than xstrdup(git_path("...")) path.c: Use vsnpath() in the implementation of git_path() path.c: Don't discard the return value of vsnpath() path.c: Remove the 'git_' prefix from a file scope function
2012-09-04Call git_pathdup() rather than xstrdup(git_path("..."))Libravatar Ramsay Jones1-1/+2
In addition to updating the two xstrdup(git_path("...")) call sites with git_pathdup(), we also fix a memory leak by freeing the memory allocated to the ADD_EDIT.patch 'file' in the edit_patch() function. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-20i18n: add: mark parseopt strings for translationLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-13/+13
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-22Merge branch 'ar/clone-honor-umask-at-top' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
A handful of files and directories we create had tighter than necessary permission bits when the user wanted to have group writability (e.g. by setting "umask 002"). * ar/clone-honor-umask-at-top: add: create ADD_EDIT.patch with mode 0666 rerere: make rr-cache fanout directory honor umask Restore umasks influence on the permissions of work tree created by clone
2012-07-15Merge branch 'ar/clone-honor-umask-at-top'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
A handful of files and directories we create had tighter than necessary permission bits when the user wanted to have group writability (e.g. by setting "umask 002"). * ar/clone-honor-umask-at-top: add: create ADD_EDIT.patch with mode 0666 rerere: make rr-cache fanout directory honor umask Restore umasks influence on the permissions of work tree created by clone
2012-07-11Merge branch 'jc/ls-files-i-dir' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
"git ls-files --exclude=t -i" did not consider anything under t/ as excluded, as it did not pay attention to exclusion of leading paths while walking the index. Other two users of excluded() are also updated. * jc/ls-files-i-dir: dir.c: make excluded() file scope static unpack-trees.c: use path_excluded() in check_ok_to_remove() builtin/add.c: use path_excluded() path_excluded(): update API to less cache-entry centric ls-files -i: micro-optimize path_excluded() ls-files -i: pay attention to exclusion of leading paths
2012-07-09add: create ADD_EDIT.patch with mode 0666Libravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
We should be letting the user's umask take care of restricting permissions. Even though this is a temporary file and probably nobody would notice, this brings us in line with other temporary file creations in git (e.g., choosing "e"dit from git-add--interactive). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-21Merge branch 'jc/ls-files-i-dir'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
"git ls-files --exclude=t -i" did not consider anything under t/ as excluded, as it did not pay attention to exclusion of leading paths while walking the index. Other two users of excluded() are also updated. * jc/ls-files-i-dir: dir.c: make excluded() file scope static unpack-trees.c: use path_excluded() in check_ok_to_remove() builtin/add.c: use path_excluded() path_excluded(): update API to less cache-entry centric ls-files -i: micro-optimize path_excluded() ls-files -i: pay attention to exclusion of leading paths
2012-06-05builtin/add.c: use path_excluded()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
This only happens in --ignore-missing --dry-run codepath which presumably nobody should care, but is for completeness. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Merge branch 'js/add-e-submodule-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* js/add-e-submodule-fix: add -e: do not show difference in a submodule that is merely dirty
2012-02-10Merge branch 'js/add-e-submodule-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* js/add-e-submodule-fix: add -e: do not show difference in a submodule that is merely dirty