summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin-pack-objects.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-09-01builtin-pack-objects.c: avoid vlaLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+3
This is one of only two places that we use C99 variable length array on the stack, which some older compilers apparently are not happy with. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-31Style fixes, add a space after if/for/while.Libravatar Brian Gianforcaro1-1/+1
The majority of code in core git appears to use a single space after if/for/while. This is an attempt to bring more code to this standard. These are entirely cosmetic changes. Signed-off-by: Brian Gianforcaro <b.gianfo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-21Merge branch 'cc/replace'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
* cc/replace: t6050: check pushing something based on a replaced commit Documentation: add documentation for "git replace" Add git-replace to .gitignore builtin-replace: use "usage_msg_opt" to give better error messages parse-options: add new function "usage_msg_opt" builtin-replace: teach "git replace" to actually replace Add new "git replace" command environment: add global variable to disable replacement mktag: call "check_sha1_signature" with the replacement sha1 replace_object: add a test case object: call "check_sha1_signature" with the replacement sha1 sha1_file: add a "read_sha1_file_repl" function replace_object: add mechanism to replace objects found in "refs/replace/" refs: add a "for_each_replace_ref" function
2009-08-05don't let the delta cache grow unbounded in 'git repack'Libravatar Nicolas Pitre1-1/+1
I have 4GB of RAM on my system which should, in theory, be quite enough to repack a 600 MB repository. However the unbounded delta cache size always pushes it into swap, at which point everything virtually comes to a halt. So unbounded caches are never a good idea. A default of 256MB should be a good compromize between memory usage and speed where medium sized repositories are still likely to fit in the cache with a reasonable memory usage, and larger repositories are going to take quite some time to repack already anyway. While at it, clarify the associated config variable documentation entries a bit. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-25Merge branch 'js/maint-graft-unhide-true-parents'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* js/maint-graft-unhide-true-parents: git repack: keep commits hidden by a graft Add a test showing that 'git repack' throws away grafted-away parents Conflicts: git-repack.sh
2009-07-24git repack: keep commits hidden by a graftLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+4
When you have grafts that pretend that a given commit has different parents than the ones recorded in the commit object, it is dangerous to let 'git repack' remove those hidden parents, as you can easily remove the graft and end up with a broken repository. So let's play it safe and keep those parent objects and everything that is reachable by them, in addition to the grafted parents. As this behavior can only be triggered by git pack-objects, and as that command handles duplicate parents gracefully, we do not bother to cull duplicated parents that may result by using both true and grafted parents. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-06Merge branch 'tr/die_errno'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-9/+5
* tr/die_errno: Use die_errno() instead of die() when checking syscalls Convert existing die(..., strerror(errno)) to die_errno() die_errno(): double % in strerror() output just in case Introduce die_errno() that appends strerror(errno) to die()
2009-06-27Convert existing die(..., strerror(errno)) to die_errno()Libravatar Thomas Rast1-9/+5
Change calls to die(..., strerror(errno)) to use the new die_errno(). In the process, also make slight style adjustments: at least state _something_ about the function that failed (instead of just printing the pathname), and put paths in single quotes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-18Fix big left-shifts of unsigned charLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-2/+1
Shifting 'unsigned char' or 'unsigned short' left can result in sign extension errors, since the C integer promotion rules means that the unsigned char/short will get implicitly promoted to a signed 'int' due to the shift (or due to other operations). This normally doesn't matter, but if you shift things up sufficiently, it will now set the sign bit in 'int', and a subsequent cast to a bigger type (eg 'long' or 'unsigned long') will now sign-extend the value despite the original expression being unsigned. One example of this would be something like unsigned long size; unsigned char c; size += c << 24; where despite all the variables being unsigned, 'c << 24' ends up being a signed entity, and will get sign-extended when then doing the addition in an 'unsigned long' type. Since git uses 'unsigned char' pointers extensively, we actually have this bug in a couple of places. I may have missed some, but this is the result of looking at git grep '[^0-9 ][ ]*<<[ ][a-z]' -- '*.c' '*.h' git grep '<<[ ]*24' which catches at least the common byte cases (shifting variables by a variable amount, and shifting by 24 bits). I also grepped for just 'unsigned char' variables in general, and converted the ones that most obviously ended up getting implicitly cast immediately anyway (eg hash_name(), encode_85()). In addition to just avoiding 'unsigned char', this patch also tries to use a common idiom for the delta header size thing. We had three different variations on it: "& 0x7fUL" in one place (getting the sign extension right), and "& ~0x80" and "& 0x7f" in two other places (not getting it right). Apart from making them all just avoid using "unsigned char" at all, I also unified them to then use a simple "& 0x7f". I considered making a sparse extension which warns about doing implicit casts from unsigned types to signed types, but it gets rather complex very quickly, so this is just a hack. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-31environment: add global variable to disable replacementLibravatar Christian Couder1-0/+2
This new "read_replace_refs" global variable is set to 1 by default, so that replace refs are used by default. But reachability traversal and packing commands ("cmd_fsck", "cmd_prune", "cmd_pack_objects", "upload_pack", "cmd_unpack_objects") set it to 0, as they must work with the original DAG. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-22Fix typos / spelling in commentsLibravatar Mike Ralphson1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-18Merge branch 'lt/pack-object-memuse'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+12
* lt/pack-object-memuse: show_object(): push path_name() call further down process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering Conflicts: builtin-pack-objects.c builtin-rev-list.c list-objects.c list-objects.h upload-pack.c
2009-04-12show_object(): push path_name() call further downLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-1/+3
In particular, pushing the "path_name()" call _into_ the show() function would seem to allow - more clarity into who "owns" the name (ie now when we free the name in the show_object callback, it's because we generated it ourselves by calling path_name()) - not calling path_name() at all, either because we don't care about the name in the first place, or because we are actually happy walking the linked list of "struct name_path *" and the last component. Now, I didn't do that latter optimization, because it would require some more coding, but especially looking at "builtin-pack-objects.c", we really don't even want the whole pathname, we really would be better off with the list of path components. Why? We use that name for two things: - add_preferred_base_object(), which actually _wants_ to traverse the path, and now does it by looking for '/' characters! - for 'name_hash()', which only cares about the last 16 characters of a name, so again, generating the full name seems to be just unnecessary work. Anyway, so I didn't look any closer at those things, but it did convince me that the "show_object()" calling convention was crazy, and we're actually better off doing _less_ in list-objects.c, and giving people access to the internal data structures so that they can decide whether they want to generate a path-name or not. This patch does that, and then for people who did use the name (even if they might do something more clever in the future), it just does the straightforward "name = path_name(path, component); .. free(name);" thing. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-12process_{tree,blob}: show objects without bufferingLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-6/+10
Here's a less trivial thing, and slightly more dubious one. I was looking at that "struct object_array objects", and wondering why we do that. I have honestly totally forgotten. Why not just call the "show()" function as we encounter the objects? Rather than add the objects to the object_array, and then at the very end going through the array and doing a 'show' on all, just do things more incrementally. Now, there are possible downsides to this: - the "buffer using object_array" _can_ in theory result in at least better I-cache usage (two tight loops rather than one more spread out one). I don't think this is a real issue, but in theory.. - this _does_ change the order of the objects printed. Instead of doing a "process_tree(revs, commit->tree, &objects, NULL, "");" in the loop over the commits (which puts all the root trees _first_ in the object list, this patch just adds them to the list of pending objects, and then we'll traverse them in that order (and thus show each root tree object together with the objects we discover under it) I _think_ the new ordering actually makes more sense, but the object ordering is actually a subtle thing when it comes to packing efficiency, so any change in order is going to have implications for packing. Good or bad, I dunno. - There may be some reason why we did it that odd way with the object array, that I have simply forgotten. Anyway, now that we don't buffer up the objects before showing them that may actually result in lower memory usage during that whole traverse_commit_list() phase. This is seriously not very deeply tested. It makes sense to me, it seems to pass all the tests, it looks ok, but... Does anybody remember why we did that "object_array" thing? It used to be an "object_list" a long long time ago, but got changed into the array due to better memory usage patterns (those linked lists of obejcts are horrible from a memory allocation standpoint). But I wonder why we didn't do this back then. Maybe there's a reason for it. Or maybe there _used_ to be a reason, and no longer is. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-12Merge branch 'cc/bisect-filter'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* cc/bisect-filter: (21 commits) rev-list: add "int bisect_show_flags" in "struct rev_list_info" rev-list: remove last static vars used in "show_commit" list-objects: add "void *data" parameter to show functions bisect--helper: string output variables together with "&&" rev-list: pass "int flags" as last argument of "show_bisect_vars" t6030: test bisecting with paths bisect: use "bisect--helper" and remove "filter_skipped" function bisect: implement "read_bisect_paths" to read paths in "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" bisect--helper: implement "git bisect--helper" bisect: use the new generic "sha1_pos" function to lookup sha1 rev-list: call new "filter_skip" function patch-ids: use the new generic "sha1_pos" function to lookup sha1 sha1-lookup: add new "sha1_pos" function to efficiently lookup sha1 rev-list: pass "revs" to "show_bisect_vars" rev-list: make "show_bisect_vars" non static rev-list: move code to show bisect vars into its own function rev-list: move bisect related code into its own file rev-list: make "bisect_list" variable local to "cmd_rev_list" refs: add "for_each_ref_in" function to refactor "for_each_*_ref" functions quote: add "sq_dequote_to_argv" to put unwrapped args in an argv array ...
2009-04-12Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
* maint: GIT 1.6.2.3 State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls Conflicts: GIT-VERSION-GEN
2009-04-12Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
* maint-1.6.1: State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
2009-04-12Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
* maint-1.6.0: State the effect of filter-branch on graft explicitly process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls
2009-04-12process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup callsLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-0/+2
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > > The name of the processed object was duplicated for passing it to > add_object(), but that already calls path_name, which allocates a new > string anyway. So the memory allocated by the xstrdup calls just went > nowhere, leaking memory. Ack, ack. There's another easy 5% or so for the built-in object walker: once we've created the hash from the name, the name isn't interesting any more, and so something trivial like this can help a bit. Does it matter? Probably not on its own. But a few more memory saving tricks and it might all make a difference. Linus Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-11Update delta compression message to be less misleadingLibravatar Dan McGee1-1/+1
In the case of a small repository, pack-objects is smart enough to not start more threads than necessary. However, the output to the user always reports the value of the pack.threads configuration and not the real number of threads to be used. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-08Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-12/+27
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack: pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws is_kept_pack(): final clean-up Simplify is_kept_pack() Consolidate ignore_packed logic more has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info" has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface git-repack: resist stray environment variable Conflicts: t/t7700-repack.sh
2009-04-07list-objects: add "void *data" parameter to show functionsLibravatar Christian Couder1-3/+3
The goal of this patch is to get rid of the "static struct rev_info revs" static variable in "builtin-rev-list.c". To do that, we need to pass the revs to the "show_commit" function in "builtin-rev-list.c" and this in turn means that the "traverse_commit_list" function in "list-objects.c" must be passed functions pointers to functions with 2 parameters instead of one. So we have to change all the callers and all the functions passed to "traverse_commit_list". Anyway this makes the code more clean and more generic, so it should be a good thing in the long run. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-01Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+27
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack: pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws Conflicts: t/t7700-repack.sh
2009-03-24Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Increase the size of the die/warning buffer to avoid truncation close_sha1_file(): make it easier to diagnose errors avoid possible overflow in delta size filtering computation
2009-03-24Merge branch 'maint-1.6.1' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint-1.6.1: close_sha1_file(): make it easier to diagnose errors avoid possible overflow in delta size filtering computation
2009-03-24Merge branch 'maint-1.6.0' into maint-1.6.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint-1.6.0: close_sha1_file(): make it easier to diagnose errors avoid possible overflow in delta size filtering computation
2009-03-24avoid possible overflow in delta size filtering computationLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-1/+1
On a 32-bit system, the maximum possible size for an object is less than 4GB, while 64-bit systems may cope with larger objects. Due to this limitation, variables holding object sizes are using an unsigned long type (32 bits on 32-bit systems, or 64 bits on 64-bit systems). When large objects are encountered, and/or people play with large delta depth values, it is possible for the maximum allowed delta size computation to overflow, especially on a 32-bit system. When this occurs, surviving result bits may represent a value much smaller than what it is supposed to be, or even zero. This prevents some objects from being deltified although they do get deltified when a smaller depth limit is used. Fix this by always performing a 64-bit multiplication. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-21Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-pack-directory' into maint-1.6.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
* jc/maint-1.6.0-pack-directory: Fix odb_mkstemp() on AIX Make sure objects/pack exists before creating a new pack Conflicts: wrapper.c
2009-03-21pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packsLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+25
If pack-objects is called with the --unpack-unreachable option then it will unpack (i.e. loosen) all unreferenced objects from local not-kept packs, including those that also exist in packs residing in an alternate object database or a locally kept pack. The only user of this option is git-repack. In this case, repack will follow the call to pack-objects with a call to prune-packed, which will delete these newly loosened objects, making the act of loosening a waste of time. The unnecessary loosening can be avoided by checking whether an object exists in a non-local pack or a locally kept pack before loosening it. This fixes the 'local packed unreachable obs that exist in alternate ODB are not loosened' test in t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-20Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructureLibravatar Brandon Casey1-1/+0
This option to pack-objects/rev-list was created to improve the -A and -a options of repack. It was found to be lacking in that it did not provide the ability to differentiate between local and non-local kept packs, and found to be unnecessary since objects residing in local kept packs can be filtered out by the --honor-pack-keep option. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-20pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packsLibravatar Brandon Casey1-2/+2
These two features were invented for use by repack when repack will delete the local packs that have been made redundant. The packs accessible through alternates are not deleted by repack, so the objects contained in them are still accessible after the local packs are deleted. They do not need to be repacked into the new pack or loosened. For the case of loosening they would immediately be deleted by the subsequent prune-packed that is called by repack anyway. This fixes the test 'packed unreachable obs in alternate ODB are not loosened' in t7700. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-11Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+3
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack: is_kept_pack(): final clean-up Simplify is_kept_pack() Consolidate ignore_packed logic more has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info" has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface git-repack: resist stray environment variable
2009-02-28is_kept_pack(): final clean-upLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Now is_kept_pack() is just a member lookup into a structure, we can write it as such. Also rewrite the sole caller of has_sha1_kept_pack() to switch on the criteria the callee uses (namely, revs->kept_pack_only) between calling has_sha1_kept_pack() and has_sha1_pack(), so that these two callees do not have to take a pointer to struct rev_info as an argument. This removes the header file dependency issue temporarily introduced by the earlier commit, so we revert changes associated to that as well. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28Simplify is_kept_pack()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
This removes --unpacked=<packfile> parameter from the revision parser, and rewrites its use in git-repack to pass a single --kept-pack-only option instead. The new --kept-pack-only option means just that. When this option is given, is_kept_pack() that used to say "not on the --unpacked=<packfile> list" now says "the packfile has corresponding .keep file". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28Consolidate ignore_packed logic moreLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-10/+2
This refactors three loops that check if a given packfile is on the ignore_packed list into a function is_kept_pack(). The function returns false for a pack on the list, and true for a pack not on the list, because this list is solely used by "git repack" to pass list of packfiles that do not have corresponding .keep files, i.e. a packfile not on the list is "kept". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-25Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-pack-directory'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
* jc/maint-1.6.0-pack-directory: Make sure objects/pack exists before creating a new pack
2009-02-25Make sure objects/pack exists before creating a new packLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+2
In a repository created with git older than f49fb35 (git-init-db: create "pack" subdirectory under objects, 2005-06-27), objects/pack/ directory is not created upon initialization. It was Ok because subdirectories are created as needed inside directories init-db creates, and back then, packfiles were recent invention. After the said commit, new codepaths started relying on the presense of objects/pack/ directory in the repository. This was exacerbated with 8b4eb6b (Do not perform cross-directory renames when creating packs, 2008-09-22) that moved the location temporary pack files are created from objects/ directory to objects/pack/ directory, because moving temporary to the final location was done carefully with lazy leading directory creation. Many packfile related operations in such an old repository can fail mysteriously because of this. This commit introduces two helper functions to make things work better. - odb_mkstemp() is a specialized version of mkstemp() to refactor the code and teach it to create leading directories as needed; - odb_pack_keep() refactors the code to create a ".keep" file while create leading directories as needed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-05Merge branch 'lt/maint-wrap-zlib' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* lt/maint-wrap-zlib: Wrap inflate and other zlib routines for better error reporting Conflicts: http-push.c http-walker.c sha1_file.c
2009-01-21Merge branch 'lt/maint-wrap-zlib'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
* lt/maint-wrap-zlib: Wrap inflate and other zlib routines for better error reporting Conflicts: http-push.c http-walker.c sha1_file.c
2009-01-11Wrap inflate and other zlib routines for better error reportingLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-3/+3
R. Tyler Ballance reported a mysterious transient repository corruption; after much digging, it turns out that we were not catching and reporting memory allocation errors from some calls we make to zlib. This one _just_ wraps things; it doesn't do the "retry on low memory error" part, at least not yet. It is an independent issue from the reporting. Some of the errors are expected and passed back to the caller, but we die when zlib reports it failed to allocate memory for now. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-13pack-objects: don't use too many threads with few objectsLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-0/+4
If there are few objects to deltify, they might be split amongst threads so that there is simply no other objects left to delta against within the same thread. Let's use the same 2*window treshold as used for the final load balancing to allow extra threads to be created. This fixes the benign t5300 test failure. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Tested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-12autodetect number of CPUs by default when using threadsLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-1/+4
... and display the actual number of threads used when locally repacking. A remote server still won't tell you how many threads it uses during a fetch though. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-11Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* maint: fsck: reduce stack footprint make sure packs to be replaced are closed beforehand
2008-12-10make sure packs to be replaced are closed beforehandLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-0/+1
Especially on Windows where an opened file cannot be replaced, make sure pack-objects always close packs it is about to replace. Even on non Windows systems, this could save potential bad results if ever objects were to be read from the new pack file using offset from the old index. This should fix t5303 on Windows. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Tested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> (MinGW) Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-02Merge branch 'bc/maint-keep-pack' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
* bc/maint-keep-pack: repack: only unpack-unreachable if we are deleting redundant packs t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A] repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
2008-11-12Merge branch 'np/pack-safer'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-19/+58
* np/pack-safer: t5303: fix printf format string for portability t5303: work around printf breakage in dash pack-objects: don't leak pack window reference when splitting packs extend test coverage for latest pack corruption resilience improvements pack-objects: allow "fixing" a corrupted pack without a full repack make find_pack_revindex() aware of the nasty world make check_object() resilient to pack corruptions make packed_object_info() resilient to pack corruptions make unpack_object_header() non fatal better validation on delta base object offsets close another possibility for propagating pack corruption
2008-11-12Merge branch 'bc/maint-keep-pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+10
* bc/maint-keep-pack: t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A] repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
2008-11-12Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+10
* maint: Start 1.6.0.5 cycle Fix pack.packSizeLimit and --max-pack-size handling checkout: Fix "initial checkout" detection Remove the period after the git-check-attr summary Conflicts: RelNotes
2008-11-12Fix pack.packSizeLimit and --max-pack-size handlingLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-2/+10
If the limit was sufficiently low, having a single object written could bust the limit (by design), but caused the remaining allowed size to go negative for subsequent objects, which for an unsigned variable is a rather huge limit. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-12pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects tooLibravatar Brandon Casey1-0/+3
With this patch, --local means pack only local objects that are not already packed. Additionally, this fixes t7700 testing whether loose objects in an alternate object database are repacked. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>