summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin-add.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2007-08-28git-add: Make the "tried to add ignored file" error message less confusingLibravatar Petr Baudis1-3/+3
Currently the error message seems to imply (at least to me) that only the listed files were withheld and the rest of the files was added to the index, even though that's obviously not the case. Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-25Make usage documentation for git-add consistent.Libravatar Brian Hetro1-1/+1
The usage string for the executable was missing --refresh. In addition, the documentation referred to "file", but the usage string referred to "filepattern". Updated the documentation to "filepattern", as git-add does handle patterns. Signed-off-by: Brian Hetro <whee@smaertness.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-15Merge branch 'maint' to sync with 1.5.2.5Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+5
* maint: GIT 1.5.2.5 git-add -u paths... now works from subdirectory Fix "git add -u" data corruption.
2007-08-15git-add -u paths... now works from subdirectoryLibravatar Salikh Zakirov1-4/+4
git-add -u also takes the path limiters, but unlike the command without the -u option, the code forgot that it could be invoked from a subdirectory, and did not correctly handle the prefix. Signed-off-by: Salikh Zakirov <salikh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-15Fix "git add -u" data corruption.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
This applies to 'maint' to fix a rather serious data corruption issue. When "git add -u" affects a subdirectory in such a way that the only changes to its contents are path removals, the next tree object written out of that index was bogus, as the remove codepath forgot to invalidate the cache-tree entry. Reported by Salikh Zakirov. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-08-13git-add: Add support for --refresh option.Libravatar Alexandre Julliard1-1/+27
This allows to refresh only a subset of the project files, based on the specified pathspecs. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-28Don't rely on unspecified behaviorLibravatar Thomas Schwinge1-1/+1
Calling access(p, m) with p == NULL is not specified, so don't do that. On GNU/Hurd systems doing so will result in a SIGSEGV. Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-06-13builtin-add: simplify (and increase accuracy of) exclude handlingLibravatar Jeff King1-48/+21
Previously, the code would always set up the excludes, and then manually pick through the pathspec we were given, assuming that non-added but existing paths were just ignored. This was mostly correct, but would erroneously mark a totally empty directory as 'ignored'. Instead, we now use the collect_ignored option of dir_struct, which unambiguously tells us whether a path was ignored. This simplifies the code, and means empty directories are now just not mentioned at all. Furthermore, we now conditionally ask dir_struct to respect excludes, depending on whether the '-f' flag has been set. This means we don't have to pick through the result, checking for an 'ignored' flag; ignored entries were either added or not in the first place. We can safely get rid of the special 'ignored' flags to dir_entry, which were not used anywhere else. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-05-12git-add: allow path limiting with -uLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+6
Rather than updating all working tree paths, we limit ourselves to paths listed on the command line. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-20git-add -u: match the index with working tree.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+57
This is a shorthand of what "git commit -a" does in preparation for making a commit, which is: git diff-files --name-only -z | git update-index --remove -z --stdin Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07Merge branch 'jc/index-output'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
* jc/index-output: git-read-tree --index-output=<file> _GIT_INDEX_OUTPUT: allow plumbing to output to an alternative index file. Conflicts: builtin-apply.c
2007-04-05Rename add_file_to_index() to add_file_to_cache()Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
This function was not called "add_file_to_cache()" only because an ancient program, update-cache, used that name as an internal function name that does something slightly different. Now that is gone, we can take over the better name. The plan is to name all functions that operate on the default index xxx_cache(). Later patches create a variant of them that take an explicit parameter xxx_index(), and then turn xxx_cache() functions into macros that use "the_index". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-03_GIT_INDEX_OUTPUT: allow plumbing to output to an alternative index file.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
When defined, this allows plumbing commands that update the index (add, apply, checkout-index, merge-recursive, mv, read-tree, rm, update-index, and write-tree) to write their resulting index to an alternative index file while holding a lock to the original index file. With this, git-commit that jumps the index does not have to make an extra copy of the index file, and more importantly, it can do the update while holding the lock on the index. However, I think the interface to let an environment variable specify the output is a mistake, as shown in the documentation. If a curious user has the environment variable set to something other than the file GIT_INDEX_FILE points at, almost everything will break. This should instead be a command line parameter to tell these plumbing commands to write the result in the named file, to prevent stupid mistakes. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-31Optimize directory listing with pathspec limiter.Libravatar Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
The way things are set up, you can now pass a "pathspec" to the "read_directory()" function. If you pass NULL, it acts exactly like it used to do (read everything). If you pass a non-NULL pointer, it will simplify it into a "these are the prefixes without any special characters", and stop any readdir() early if the path in question doesn't match any of the prefixes. NOTE! This does *not* obviate the need for the caller to do the *exact* pathspec match later. It's a first-level filter on "read_directory()", but it does not do the full pathspec thing. Maybe it should. But in the meantime, builtin-add.c really does need to do first read_directory(dir, .., pathspec); if (pathspec) prune_directory(dir, pathspec, baselen); ie the "prune_directory()" part will do the *exact* pathspec pruning, while the "read_directory()" will use the pathspec just to do some quick high-level pruning of the directories it will recurse into. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-09add: Support specifying an excludes file with a configuration variableLibravatar James Bowes1-1/+17
This adds the 'core.excludesfile' configuration variable. This variable can hold a path to a file containing patterns of file names to exclude from git-add, like $GIT_DIR/info/exclude. Patterns in the excludes file are used in addition to those in info/exclude. Signed-off-by: James Bowes <jbowes@dangerouslyinc.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-17Make a short-and-sweet "git-add -i" synonym for "git-add --interactive"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-29Fix 'git add' with .gitignoreLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-25/+27
When '*.ig' is ignored, and you have two files f.ig and d.ig/foo in the working tree, $ git add . correctly ignored f.ig but failed to ignore d.ig/foo. This was caused by a thinko in an earlier commit 4888c534, when we tried to allow adding otherwise ignored files. After reverting that commit, this takes a much simpler approach. When we have an unmatched pathspec that talks about an existing pathname, we know it is an ignored path the user tried to add, so we include it in the set of paths directory walker returned. This does not let you say "git add -f D" on an ignored directory D and add everything under D. People can submit a patch to further allow it if they want to, but I think it is a saner behaviour to require explicit paths to be spelled out in such a case. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-25git-add -f: allow adding otherwise ignored files.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+29
Instead of just warning, refuse to add otherwise ignored files by default, and allow it with an -f option. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-25git-add: warn when adding an ignored file with an explicit request.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
We allow otherwise ignored paths to be added to the index by spelling its path out on the command line, but we would warn the user about them when we do so. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-25git-add: add ignored files when asked explicitly.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+10
One thing many people found confusing about git-add was that a file whose name matches an ignored pattern could not be added to the index. With this, such a file can be added by explicitly spelling its name to git-add. Fileglobs and recursive behaviour do not add ignored files to the index. That is, if a pattern '*.o' is in .gitignore, and two files foo.o, bar/baz.o are in the working tree: $ git add foo.o $ git add '*.o' $ git add bar Only the first form adds foo.o to the index. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-25Merge branch 'jc/git-add--interactive'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+16
* jc/git-add--interactive: git-add --interactive: add documentation git-add --interactive: hunk splitting git-add --interactive
2006-12-25git-add --interactive: add documentationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-20git-add: error out when given no arguments.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-20simplify inclusion of system header files.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
This is a mechanical clean-up of the way *.c files include system header files. (1) sources under compat/, platform sha-1 implementations, and xdelta code are exempt from the following rules; (2) the first #include must be "git-compat-util.h" or one of our own header file that includes it first (e.g. config.h, builtin.h, pkt-line.h); (3) system headers that are included in "git-compat-util.h" need not be included in individual C source files. (4) "git-compat-util.h" does not have to include subsystem specific header files (e.g. expat.h). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-18git-add --interactiveLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+15
A script to be driven when the user says "git add --interactive" is introduced. When it is run, first it runs its internal 'status' command to show the current status, and then goes into its internactive command loop. The command loop shows the list of subcommands available, and gives a prompt "What now> ". In general, when the prompt ends with a single '>', you can pick only one of the choices given and type return, like this: *** Commands *** 1: status 2: update 3: revert 4: add untracked 5: patch 6: diff 7: quit 8: help What now> 1 You also could say "s" or "sta" or "status" above as long as the choice is unique. The main command loop has 6 subcommands (plus help and quit). * 'status' shows the change between HEAD and index (i.e. what will be committed if you say "git commit"), and between index and working tree files (i.e. what you could stage further before "git commit" using "git-add") for each path. A sample output looks like this: staged unstaged path 1: binary nothing foo.png 2: +403/-35 +1/-1 git-add--interactive.perl It shows that foo.png has differences from HEAD (but that is binary so line count cannot be shown) and there is no difference between indexed copy and the working tree version (if the working tree version were also different, 'binary' would have been shown in place of 'nothing'). The other file, git-add--interactive.perl, has 403 lines added and 35 lines deleted if you commit what is in the index, but working tree file has further modifications (one addition and one deletion). * 'update' shows the status information and gives prompt "Update>>". When the prompt ends with double '>>', you can make more than one selection, concatenated with whitespace or comma. Also you can say ranges. E.g. "2-5 7,9" to choose 2,3,4,5,7,9 from the list. You can say '*' to choose everything. What you chose are then highlighted with '*', like this: staged unstaged path 1: binary nothing foo.png * 2: +403/-35 +1/-1 git-add--interactive.perl To remove selection, prefix the input with - like this: Update>> -2 After making the selection, answer with an empty line to stage the contents of working tree files for selected paths in the index. * 'revert' has a very similar UI to 'update', and the staged information for selected paths are reverted to that of the HEAD version. Reverting new paths makes them untracked. * 'add untracked' has a very similar UI to 'update' and 'revert', and lets you add untracked paths to the index. * 'patch' lets you choose one path out of 'status' like selection. After choosing the path, it presents diff between the index and the working tree file and asks you if you want to stage the change of each hunk. You can say: y - add the change from that hunk to index n - do not add the change from that hunk to index a - add the change from that hunk and all the rest to index d - do not the change from that hunk nor any of the rest to index j - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the next undecided hunk J - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the next hunk k - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the previous undecided hunk K - do not decide on this hunk now, and view the previous hunk After deciding the fate for all hunks, if there is any hunk that was chosen, the index is updated with the selected hunks. * 'diff' lets you review what will be committed (i.e. between HEAD and index). This is still rough, but does everything except a few things I think are needed. * 'patch' should be able to allow splitting a hunk into multiple hunks. * 'patch' does not adjust the line offsets @@ -k,l +m,n @@ in the hunk header. This does not have major problem in practice, but it _should_ do the adjustment. * It does not have any explicit support for a merge in progress; it may not work at all. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-04make 'git add' a first class user friendly interface to the indexLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-3/+3
This brings the power of the index up front using a proper mental model without talking about the index at all. See for example how all the technical discussion has been evacuated from the git-add man page. Any content to be committed must be added together. Whether that content comes from new files or modified files doesn't matter. You just need to "add" it, either with git-add, or by providing git-commit with -a (for already known files only of course). No need for a separate command to distinguish new vs modified files please. That would only screw the mental model everybody should have when using GIT. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-09-15Fix duplicate xmalloc in builtin-addLibravatar Liu Yubao1-1/+0
[jc: patch came without sign-off but it was too obvious and trivial.] Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-12Better error message when we are unable to lock the index fileLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+1
Most of the callers except the one in refs.c use the function to update the index file. Among the index writers, everybody except write-tree dies if they cannot open it for writing. This gives the function an extra argument, to tell it to die when it cannot create a new file as the lockfile. The only caller that does not have to die is write-tree, because updating the index for the cache-tree part is optional and not being able to do so does not affect the correctness. I think we do not have to be so careful and make the failure into die() the same way as other callers, but that would be a different patch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-08-03Replace some calls to die(usage_str) with usage(usage_str).Libravatar Ramsay Allan Jones1-1/+1
The only change in behaviour should be having a "usage: " prefix on the output string rather than "fatal: ", and an exit code of 129 rather than 128. Signed-off-by: Ramsay Allan Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-29Merge branch 'lt/setup' into __/setup-n-mvLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+1
This merges the new built-in calling convention code into Johannes's builtin-mv topic in order to resolve their conflicts early on. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-29Call setup_git_directory() much earlierLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-2/+1
This changes the calling convention of built-in commands and passes the "prefix" (i.e. pathname of $PWD relative to the project root level) down to them. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-26Make git-mv a builtinLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-40/+0
This also moves add_file_to_index() to read-cache.c. Oh, and while touching builtin-add.c, it also removes a duplicate git_config() call. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-25Substitute xmalloc()+memset(0) with xcalloc().Libravatar Peter Eriksen1-2/+1
Signed-off-by: Peter Eriksen <s022018@student.dtu.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08Close the index file between writing and committingLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-06-06Make index file locking code reusable to others.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
The framework to create lockfiles that are removed at exit is first used to reliably write the index file, but it is applicable to other things, so stop calling it "cache_file". This also rewords a few remaining error message that called the index file "cache file". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-20Merge branch 'lt/dirwalk' into jc/dirwalk-n-cache-treeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+189
This commit is what this branch is all about. It records the evil merge needed to adjust built-in git-add and git-rm for the cache-tree extension. * lt/dirwalk: Add builtin "git rm" command Move pathspec matching from builtin-add.c into dir.c Prevent bogus paths from being added to the index. builtin-add: fix unmatched pathspec warnings. Remove old "git-add.sh" remnants builtin-add: warn on unmatched pathspecs Do "git add" as a builtin Clean up git-ls-file directory walking library interface libify git-ls-files directory traversal Conflicts: Makefile builtin.h git.c update-index.c
2006-05-19Move pathspec matching from builtin-add.c into dir.cLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-81/+1
I'll use it for builtin-rm.c too. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-18builtin-add: fix unmatched pathspec warnings.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
"git add Documentation/" when Documentation directory exists does not barf (as it should not), but "git add ." barfed when it did not add anything. This was because we checked for the path prefix ("Documentation/" in the former case, and an empty string in the latter case) for existence, and lstat("", &st) would say "Huh?". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-17builtin-add: warn on unmatched pathspecsLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-19/+58
This is in the same spirit as what bba319b5 and 45e48120 tried to do to help users. A command such as "git add Documentaiton" with misspelled pathspecs would give a friendly reminder with this. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-05-17Do "git add" as a builtinLibravatar Linus Torvalds1-0/+228
First try. Let's see how well this works. In many ways, the hard parts of "git commit" are not so different from this, and a builtin commit would share a lot of the code, I think. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>