summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/revisions.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2014-01-21Documentation: @{-N} can refer to a commitLibravatar Thomas Rast1-1/+1
The @{-N} syntax always referred to the N-th last thing checked out, which can be either a branch or a commit (for detached HEAD cases). However, the documentation only mentioned branches. Edit in a "/commit" in the appropriate places. Reported-by: Kevin <ikke@ikke.info> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-20Merge branch 'fc/at-head'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
Instead of typing four capital letters "HEAD", you can say "@" now, e.g. "git log @". * fc/at-head: Add new @ shortcut for HEAD sha1-name: pass len argument to interpret_branch_name()
2013-09-20Merge branch 'rh/peeling-tag-to-tag'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
Make "foo^{tag}" to peel a tag to itself, i.e. no-op., and fail if "foo" is not a tag. "git rev-parse --verify v1.0^{tag}" would be a more convenient way to say "test $(git cat-file -t v1.0) = tag". * rh/peeling-tag-to-tag: peel_onion: do not assume length of x_type globals peel_onion(): add support for <rev>^{tag}
2013-09-12Add new @ shortcut for HEADLibravatar Felipe Contreras1-0/+3
Typing 'HEAD' is tedious, especially when we can use '@' instead. The reason for choosing '@' is that it follows naturally from the ref@op syntax (e.g. HEAD@{u}), except we have no ref, and no operation, and when we don't have those, it makes sens to assume 'HEAD'. So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness. Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so let's make it invalid. Probably very few people, if any, used this name. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-04revisions.txt: fix and clarify <rev>^{<type>}Libravatar Richard Hansen1-4/+8
If possible, <rev> will be dereferenced even if it is not a tag type (e.g., commit dereferenced to a tree). Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-03peel_onion(): add support for <rev>^{tag}Libravatar Richard Hansen1-0/+3
Complete the <rev>^{<type>} family of object descriptors by having <rev>^{tag} dereference <rev> until a tag object is found (or fail if unable). At first glance this may not seem very useful, as commits, trees, and blobs cannot be peeled to a tag, and a tag would just peel to itself. However, this can be used to ensure that <rev> names a tag object: $ git rev-parse --verify v1.8.4^{tag} 04f013dc38d7512eadb915eba22efc414f18b869 $ git rev-parse --verify master^{tag} error: master^{tag}: expected tag type, but the object dereferences to tree type fatal: Needed a single revision Users can already ensure that <rev> is a tag object by checking the output of 'git cat-file -t <rev>', but: * users may expect <rev>^{tag} to exist given that <rev>^{commit}, <rev>^{tree}, and <rev>^{blob} all exist * this syntax is more convenient/natural in some circumstances Signed-off-by: Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-14Revert "Add new @ shortcut for HEAD"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+0
This reverts commit cdfd94837b27c220f70f032b596ea993d195488f, as it does not just apply to "@" (and forms with modifiers like @{u} applied to it), but also affects e.g. "refs/heads/@/foo", which it shouldn't. The basic idea of giving a short-hand might be good, and the topic can be retried later, but let's revert to avoid affecting existing use cases for now for the upcoming release.
2013-05-08Add new @ shortcut for HEADLibravatar Felipe Contreras1-0/+3
Typing 'HEAD' is tedious, especially when we can use '@' instead. The reason for choosing '@' is that it follows naturally from the ref@op syntax (e.g. HEAD@{u}), except we have no ref, and no operation, and when we don't have those, it makes sens to assume 'HEAD'. So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness. Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so let's make it invalid. Probably very few people, if any, used this name. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-26Merge branch 'rr/shortlog-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+4
Update documentation for "log" and "shortlog". * rr/shortlog-doc: builtin/shortlog.c: make usage string consistent with log builtin/log.c: make usage string consistent with doc git-shortlog.txt: make SYNOPSIS match log, update OPTIONS git-log.txt: rewrite note on why "--" may be required git-log.txt: generalize <since>..<until> git-log.txt: order OPTIONS properly; move <since>..<until> revisions.txt: clarify the .. and ... syntax git-shortlog.txt: remove (-h|--help) from OPTIONS
2013-04-21revisions.txt: clarify the .. and ... syntaxLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-2/+4
In <rev1>..<rev2> and <rev1>...<rev2>, if either <rev1> or <rev2> is omitted, it defaults to 'HEAD'. Add this detail to the document. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-21Merge branch 'ta/glossary'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
* ta/glossary: glossary: improve definitions of refspec and pathspec The name of the hash function is "SHA-1", not "SHA1" glossary: improve description of SHA-1 related topics glossary: remove outdated/misleading/irrelevant entries
2013-04-15The name of the hash function is "SHA-1", not "SHA1"Libravatar Thomas Ackermann1-2/+2
Use "SHA-1" instead of "SHA1" whenever we talk about the hash function. When used as a programming symbol, we keep "SHA1". Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12Sync with 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and tests kwset: fix spelling in comments precompose-utf8: fix spelling of "want" in error message compat/nedmalloc: fix spelling in comments compat/regex: fix spelling and grammar in comments obstack: fix spelling of similar contrib/subtree: fix spelling of accidentally git-remote-mediawiki: spelling fixes doc: various spelling fixes fast-export: fix argument name in error messages Documentation: distinguish between ref and offset deltas in pack-format i18n: make the translation of -u advice in one go
2013-04-12doc: various spelling fixesLibravatar Stefano Lattarini1-1/+1
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-03Merge branch 'jc/sha1-name-object-peeler'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
There was no good way to ask "I have a random string that came from outside world. I want to turn it into a 40-hex object name while making sure such an object exists". A new peeling suffix ^{object} can be used for that purpose, together with "rev-parse --verify". * jc/sha1-name-object-peeler: peel_onion(): teach $foo^{object} peeler peel_onion: disambiguate to favor tree-ish when we know we want a tree-ish
2013-03-31peel_onion(): teach $foo^{object} peelerLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
A string that names an object can be suffixed with ^{type} peeler to say "I have this object name; peel it until you get this type. If you cannot do so, it is an error". v1.8.2^{commit} asks for a commit that is pointed at an annotated tag v1.8.2; v1.8.2^{tree} unwraps it further to the top-level tree object. A special suffix ^{} (i.e. no type specified) means "I do not care what it unwraps to; just peel annotated tag until you get something that is not a tag". When you have a random user-supplied string, you can turn it to a bare 40-hex object name, and cause it to error out if such an object does not exist, with: git rev-parse --verify "$userstring^{}" for most objects, but this does not yield the tag object name when $userstring refers to an annotated tag. Introduce a new suffix, ^{object}, that only makes sure the given name refers to an existing object. Then git rev-parse --verify "$userstring^{object}" becomes a way to make sure $userstring refers to an existing object. This is necessary because the plumbing "rev-parse --verify" is only about "make sure the argument is something we can feed to get_sha1() and turn it into a raw 20-byte object name SHA-1" and is not about "make sure that 20-byte object name SHA-1 refers to an object that exists in our object store". When the given $userstring is already a 40-hex, by definition "rev-parse --verify $userstring" can turn it into a raw 20-byte object name. With "$userstring^{object}", we can make sure that the 40-hex string names an object that exists in our object store before "--verify" kicks in. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-17Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+4
* maint: rev-parse: clarify documentation of $name@{upstream} syntax sha1_name: pass object name length to diagnose_invalid_sha1_path() Makefile: keep LIB_H entries together and sorted
2013-03-17rev-parse: clarify documentation of $name@{upstream} syntaxLibravatar Kacper Kornet1-4/+4
"git rev-parse" interprets string in string@{upstream} as a name of a branch not a ref. For example, refs/heads/master@{upstream} looks for an upstream branch that is merged by git-pull to ref refs/heads/refs/heads/master not to refs/heads/master. However the documentation could mislead a user to believe that the string is interpreted as ref. Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-01Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git'Libravatar Thomas Ackermann1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-07Merge branch 'nd/branch-v-alignment'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+2
Output from "git branch -v" contains "(no branch)" that could be localized, but the code to align it along with the names of branches were counting in bytes, not in display columns. * nd/branch-v-alignment: branch -v: align even when branch names are in UTF-8
2012-08-27branch -v: align even when branch names are in UTF-8Libravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+2
Branch names are usually in ASCII so they are not the problem. The problem most likely comes from "(no branch)" translation, which is in UTF-8 and makes display-width calculation just wrong. Clarify this by renaming the field "len" in struct ref_item to "width", as it stores the display-width and is used to compute the width of the screen needed to show the names of all the branches, and compute the display width using utf8_strwidth(), not byte-length with strlen(). Update document to mention the fact that we may want ref names in UTF-8. Encodings that produce invalid UTF-8 are safe as utf8_strwidth() falls back to strlen(). The ones that incidentally produce valid UTF-8 sequences will cause misalignment. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-23specifying ranges: we did not mean to make ".." an empty setLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
Either end of revision range operator can be omitted to default to HEAD, as in "origin.." (what did I do since I forked) or "..origin" (what did they do since I forked). But the current parser interprets ".." as an empty range "HEAD..HEAD", and worse yet, because ".." does exist on the filesystem, we get this annoying output: $ cd Documentation/howto $ git log .. ;# give me recent commits that touch Documentation/ area. fatal: ambiguous argument '..': both revision and filename Use '--' to separate filenames from revisions Surely we could say "git log ../" or even "git log -- .." to disambiguate, but we shouldn't have to. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-24Enumerate revision range specifiers in the documentationLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+31
It was a bit hard to learn how <rev>^@, <rev>^! and various other forms of range specifiers are used, because they were discussed mostly in the prose part of the documentation, unlike various forms of extended SHA-1 expressions that are listed in an enumerated list. Also add a few more examples showing use of <rev>, <rev>..<rev> and <rev>^! forms, stolen from a patch by Max Horn. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-05Make <refname> documentation more consistent.Libravatar Max Horn1-6/+6
Formerly, the documentation for <refname> would occasionally say <name> instead of <refname>. Now it uniformly uses <refname>. Signed-off-by: Max Horn <max@quendi.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-02Documentation: do not assume that n > 1 in <rev>~$nLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
We explained <rev>~<n> as <n>th generation grand-parent, but a reader got confused by the "grand-" part when <n> is 1. Reword it with "ancestor"; with the "generation" and "following only the first parents" around there, what we try to describe should be clear enough now. Noticed-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Helped-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-04revisions.txt: language improvementsLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-35/+35
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-01revisions.txt: structure with a labelled listLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-35/+51
Currently, the reader has to parse a textual description in order to find a specific syntax in the list. Restructure as a labelled list with systematic labels as well as concrete examples as a visual guide. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-01revisions.txt: consistent use of quotesLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-52/+52
Our use of quotes is inconsistent everywhere and within some files. Before reworking the structure of revisions.txt, make the quotes consistent: `git command` 'some snippet or term' The former gets typeset as code, the latter with some form of emphasis. the man backend uses two types of emphasis. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-21Introduce CHERRY_PICK_HEADLibravatar Jay Soffian1-1/+4
When a cherry-pick conflicts git advises: $ git commit -c <original commit id> to preserve the original commit message and authorship. Instead, let's record the original commit id in CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and advise: $ git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD A later patch teaches git to handle the '-c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' part. Note that we record CHERRY_PICK_HEAD even in the case where there are no conflicts so that we may use it to communicate authorship to commit; this will then allow us to remove set_author_ident_env from revert.c. However, we do not record CHERRY_PICK_HEAD when --no-commit is used, as presumably the user intends to further edit the commit and possibly even cherry-pick additional commits on top. Tests and documentation contributed by Jonathan Nieder. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-21Merge branch 'nd/oneline-sha1-name-from-specific-ref'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
* nd/oneline-sha1-name-from-specific-ref: get_sha1: handle special case $commit^{/} get_sha1: support $commit^{/regex} syntax get_sha1_oneline: make callers prepare the commit list to traverse get_sha1_oneline: fix lifespan rule of temp_commit_buffer variable
2010-12-14get_sha1: support $commit^{/regex} syntaxLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+6
This works like ":/regex" syntax that finds a recently created commit starting from all refs, but limits the discovery to those reachable from the named commit. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-07get_sha1: support relative path ":path" syntaxLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+4
Currently :path and ref:path can be used to refer to a specific object in index or ref respectively. "path" component is absolute path. This patch allows "path" to be written as "./path" or "../path", which is relative to user's original cwd. This does not work in commands for which startup_info is NULL (i.e. non-builtin ones, it seems none of them needs this anyway). Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27update comment and documentation for :/foo syntaxLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+3
The documentation in revisions.txt did not match the implementation, and the comment in sha1_name.c was incomplete. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-05Documentation: split off rev doc into include fileLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+199
Currently, the documentation for revisions and ranges sits in the git-rev-parse man page, i.e. a plumbing man page, along with the documentation of all rev-parse modes. Split off the revisions and ranges section into an included file to prepare for restructuring. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>