summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-10-26Merge branch 'kb/merge-recursive-rename-threshold'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+4
* kb/merge-recursive-rename-threshold: diff: add synonyms for -M, -C, -B merge-recursive: option to specify rename threshold Conflicts: Documentation/diff-options.txt Documentation/merge-strategies.txt
2010-10-26Merge branch 'jf/merge-ignore-ws'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+22
* jf/merge-ignore-ws: merge-recursive: options to ignore whitespace changes merge-recursive --patience ll-merge: replace flag argument with options struct merge-recursive: expose merge options for builtin merge
2010-10-08Use angles for placeholders consistentlyLibravatar Štěpán Němec1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-29merge-recursive: option to specify rename thresholdLibravatar Kevin Ballard1-0/+4
The recursive merge strategy turns on rename detection but leaves the rename threshold at the default. Add a strategy option to allow the user to specify a rename threshold to use. Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-27merge-recursive: options to ignore whitespace changesLibravatar Justin Frankel1-0/+15
Add support for merging with ignoring line endings (specifically --ignore-space-at-eol) when using recursive merging. This is as a strategy-option, so that you can do: git merge --strategy-option=ignore-space-at-eol <branch> and git rebase --strategy-option=ignore-space-at-eol <branch> This can be useful for coping with line-ending damage (Xcode 3.1 has a nasty habit of converting all CRLFs to LFs, and VC6 tends to just use CRLFs for inserted lines). The only option I need is ignore-space-at-eol, but while at it, include the other xdiff whitespace options (ignore-space-change, ignore-all-space), too. [jn: with documentation] Signed-off-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-26merge-recursive --patienceLibravatar Justin Frankel1-0/+7
Teach the merge-recursive strategy a --patience option to use the "patience diff" algorithm, which tends to improve results when cherry-picking a patch that reorders functions at the same time as refactoring them. To support this, struct merge_options and ll_merge_options gain an xdl_opts member, so programs can use arbitrary xdiff flags (think "XDF_IGNORE_WHITESPACE") in a git-aware merge. git merge and git rebase can be passed the -Xpatience option to use this. [jn: split from --ignore-space patch; with documentation] Signed-off-by: Justin Frankel <justin@cockos.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06merge-recursive --renormalizeLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-0/+12
Teach "git merge-recursive" a --renormalize option to enable the merge.renormalize configuration. The --no-renormalize option can be used to override it in the negative. So in the future, you might be able to, e.g.: git checkout -m -Xrenormalize otherbranch or git revert -Xrenormalize otherpatch or git pull --rebase -Xrenormalize The bad part: merge.renormalize is still not honored for most commands. And it reveals lots of places that -X has not been plumbed in (so we get "git merge -Xrenormalize" but not much else). NEEDSWORK: tests Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-17Document that merge strategies can now take their own optionsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+28
Also document the recently added -Xtheirs, -Xours and -Xsubtree[=path] options to the merge-recursive strategy. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-15Documentation: clarify 'ours' merge strategyLibravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+3
Make it clear in the docs that the merge takes the tree of HEAD and ignores everything in the other branches. This should hopefully clear up confusion, usually caused by the user looking for a strategy that resolves all conflict hunks in favour of HEAD (which is completely different and currently not supported). Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-25Grammar fixes to "merge" and "patch-id" docsLibravatar Wincent Colaiuta1-7/+7
Signed-off-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-19Documentation/git-merge: document subtree strategy.Libravatar Miklos Vajna1-0/+7
There was already some documentation about subtree under Documentation/howto but it was missing from git-merge manpage. Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2005-12-08Documentation: recursive is the default strategy these days.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
We still said resolve was the default in handful places. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-06Refactor merge strategies into separate includable file.Libravatar Jon Loeliger1-0/+35
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-01 02:24:56 +0000