summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-fetch-pack.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-10-16Split over-long synopsis in git-fetch-pack.txt into several linesLibravatar Thomas Ackermann1-1/+4
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-02fetch-pack: new --stdin option to read refs from stdinLibravatar Ivan Todoroski1-0/+10
If a remote repo has too many tags (or branches), cloning it over the smart HTTP transport can fail because remote-curl.c puts all the refs from the remote repo on the fetch-pack command line. This can make the command line longer than the global OS command line limit, causing fetch-pack to fail. This is especially a problem on Windows where the command line limit is orders of magnitude shorter than Linux. There are already real repos out there that msysGit cannot clone over smart HTTP due to this problem. Here is an easy way to trigger this problem: git init too-many-refs cd too-many-refs echo bla > bla.txt git add . git commit -m test sha=$(git rev-parse HEAD) tag=$(perl -e 'print "bla" x 30') for i in `seq 50000`; do echo $sha refs/tags/$tag-$i >> .git/packed-refs done Then share this repo over the smart HTTP protocol and try cloning it: $ git clone http://localhost/.../too-many-refs/.git Cloning into 'too-many-refs'... fatal: cannot exec 'fetch-pack': Argument list too long 50k tags is obviously an absurd number, but it is required to demonstrate the problem on Linux because it has a much more generous command line limit. On Windows the clone fails with as little as 500 tags in the above loop, which is getting uncomfortably close to the number of tags you might see in real long lived repos. This is not just theoretical, msysGit is already failing to clone our company repo due to this. It's a large repo converted from CVS, nearly 10 years of history. Four possible solutions were discussed on the Git mailing list (in no particular order): 1) Call fetch-pack multiple times with smaller batches of refs. This was dismissed as inefficient and inelegant. 2) Add option --refs-fd=$n to pass a an fd from where to read the refs. This was rejected because inheriting descriptors other than stdin/stdout/stderr through exec() is apparently problematic on Windows, plus it would require changes to the run-command API to open extra pipes. 3) Add option --refs-from=$tmpfile to pass the refs using a temp file. This was not favored because of the temp file requirement. 4) Add option --stdin to pass the refs on stdin, one per line. In the end this option was chosen as the most efficient and most desirable from scripting perspective. There was however a small complication when using stdin to pass refs to fetch-pack. The --stateless-rpc option to fetch-pack also uses stdin for communication with the remote server. If we are going to sneak refs on stdin line by line, it would have to be done very carefully in the presence of --stateless-rpc, because when reading refs line by line we might read ahead too much data into our buffer and eat some of the remote protocol data which is also coming on stdin. One way to solve this would be to refactor get_remote_heads() in fetch-pack.c to accept a residual buffer from our stdin line parsing above, but this function is used in several places so other callers would be burdened by this residual buffer interface even when most of them don't need it. In the end we settled on the following solution: If --stdin is specified without --stateless-rpc, fetch-pack would read the refs from stdin one per line, in a script friendly format. However if --stdin is specified together with --stateless-rpc, fetch-pack would read the refs from stdin in packetized format (pkt-line) with a flush packet terminating the list of refs. This way we can read the exact number of bytes that we need from stdin, and then get_remote_heads() can continue reading from the same fd without losing a single byte of remote protocol data. This way the --stdin option only loses generality and scriptability when used together with --stateless-rpc, which is not easily scriptable anyway because it also uses pkt-line when talking to the remote server. Signed-off-by: Ivan Todoroski <grnch@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-07-06Documentation: use [verse] for SYNOPSIS sectionsLibravatar Martin von Zweigbergk1-0/+1
The SYNOPSIS sections of most commands that span several lines already use [verse] to retain line breaks. Most commands that don't span several lines seem not to use [verse]. In the HTML output, [verse] does not only preserve line breaks, but also makes the section indented, which causes a slight inconsistency between commands that use [verse] and those that don't. Use [verse] in all SYNOPSIS sections for consistency. Also remove the blank lines from git-fetch.txt and git-rebase.txt to align with the other man pages. In the case of git-rebase.txt, which already uses [verse], the blank line makes the [verse] not apply to the last line, so removing the blank line also makes the formatting within the document more consistent. While at it, add single quotes to 'git cvsimport' for consistency with other commands. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-11doc: drop author/documentation sections from most pagesLibravatar Jeff King1-9/+0
The point of these sections is generally to: 1. Give credit where it is due. 2. Give the reader an idea of where to ask questions or file bug reports. But they don't do a good job of either case. For (1), they are out of date and incomplete. A much more accurate answer can be gotten through shortlog or blame. For (2), the correct contact point is generally git@vger, and even if you wanted to cc the contact point, the out-of-date and incomplete fields mean you're likely sending to somebody useless. So let's drop the fields entirely from all manpages except git(1) itself. We already point people to the mailing list for bug reports there, and we can update the Authors section to give credit to the major contributors and point to shortlog and blame for more information. Each page has a "This is part of git" footer, so people can follow that to the main git manpage.
2010-02-18Documentation: describe --thin more accuratelyLibravatar Stephen Boyd1-2/+2
The description for --thin was misleading and downright wrong. Correct it with some inspiration from the description of index-pack's --fix-thin and some background information from Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-17docs: don't talk about $GIT_DIR/refs/ everywhereLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
It is misleading to say that we pull refs from $GIT_DIR/refs/*, because we may also consult the packed refs mechanism. These days we tend to treat the "refs hierarchy" as more of an abstract namespace that happens to be represented as $GIT_DIR/refs. At best, this is a minor inaccuracy, but at worst it can confuse users who then look in $GIT_DIR/refs and find that it is missing some of the refs they expected to see. This patch drops most uses of "$GIT_DIR/refs/*", changing them into just "refs/*", under the assumption that users can handle the concept of an abstract refs namespace. There are a few things to note: - most cases just dropped the $GIT_DIR/ portion. But for cases where that left _just_ the word "refs", I changed it to "refs/" to help indicate that it was a hierarchy. I didn't do the same for longer paths (e.g., "refs/heads" remained, instead of becoming "refs/heads/"). - in some cases, no change was made, as the text was explicitly about unpacked refs (e.g., the discussion in git-pack-refs). - In some cases it made sense instead to note the existence of packed refs (e.g., in check-ref-format and rev-parse). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-10Documentation: spell 'git cmd' without dash throughoutLibravatar Thomas Rast1-3/+3
The documentation was quite inconsistent when spelling 'git cmd' if it only refers to the program, not to some specific invocation syntax: both 'git-cmd' and 'git cmd' spellings exist. The current trend goes towards dashless forms, and there is precedent in 647ac70 (git-svn.txt: stop using dash-form of commands., 2009-07-07) to actively eliminate the dashed variants. Replace 'git-cmd' with 'git cmd' throughout, except where git-shell, git-cvsserver, git-upload-pack, git-receive-pack, and git-upload-archive are concerned, because those really live in the $PATH.
2008-07-05manpages: italicize git command names (which were in teletype font)Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-7/+7
The names of git commands are not meant to be entered at the commandline; they are just names. So we render them in italics, as is usual for command names in manpages. Using doit () { perl -e 'for (<>) { s/\`(git-[^\`.]*)\`/'\''\1'\''/g; print }' } for i in git*.txt config.txt diff*.txt blame*.txt fetch*.txt i18n.txt \ merge*.txt pretty*.txt pull*.txt rev*.txt urls*.txt do doit <"$i" >"$i+" && mv "$i+" "$i" done git diff . Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-01Documentation formatting and cleanupLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-8/+8
Following what appears to be the predominant style, format names of commands and commandlines both as `teletype text`. While we're at it, add articles ("a" and "the") in some places, italicize the name of the command in the manual page synopsis line, and add a comma or two where it seems appropriate. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-01Documentation: be consistent about "git-" versus "git "Libravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
Since the git-* commands are not installed in $(bindir), using "git-command <parameters>" in examples in the documentation is not a good idea. On the other hand, it is nice to be able to refer to each command using one hyphenated word. (There is no escaping it, anyway: man page names cannot have spaces in them.) This patch retains the dash in naming an operation, command, program, process, or action. Complete command lines that can be entered at a shell (i.e., without options omitted) are made to use the dashless form. The changes consist only of replacing some spaces with hyphens and vice versa. After a "s/ /-/g", the unpatched and patched versions are identical. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-08Docs: Use "-l::\n--long\n" format in OPTIONS sectionsLibravatar Stephan Beyer1-10/+12
The OPTIONS section of a documentation file contains a list of the options a git command accepts. Currently there are several variants to describe the case that different options (almost) do the same in the OPTIONS section. Some are: -f, --foo:: -f|--foo:: -f | --foo:: But AsciiDoc has the special form: -f:: --foo:: This patch applies this form to the documentation of the whole git suite, and removes useless em-dash prevention, so \--foo becomes --foo. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-06documentation: move git(7) to git(1)Libravatar Christian Couder1-1/+1
As the "git" man page describes the "git" command at the end-user level, it seems better to move it to man section 1. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-04Teach fetch-pack/upload-pack about --include-tagLibravatar Shawn O. Pearce1-1/+7
The new protocol extension "include-tag" allows the client side of the connection (fetch-pack) to request that the server side of the native git protocol (upload-pack / pack-objects) use --include-tag as it prepares the packfile, thus ensuring that an annotated tag object will be included in the resulting packfile if the object it refers to was also included into the packfile. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-06Documentation: rename gitlink macro to linkgitLibravatar Dan McGee1-2/+2
Between AsciiDoc 8.2.2 and 8.2.3, the following change was made to the stock Asciidoc configuration: @@ -149,7 +153,10 @@ # Inline macros. # Backslash prefix required for escape processing. # (?s) re flag for line spanning. -(?su)[\\]?(?P<name>\w(\w|-)*?):(?P<target>\S*?)(\[(?P<attrlist>.*?)\])= + +# Explicit so they can be nested. +(?su)[\\]?(?P<name>(http|https|ftp|file|mailto|callto|image|link)):(?P<target>\S*?)(\[(?P<attrlist>.*?)\])= + # Anchor: [[[id]]]. Bibliographic anchor. (?su)[\\]?\[\[\[(?P<attrlist>[\w][\w-]*?)\]\]\]=anchor3 # Anchor: [[id,xreflabel]] This default regex now matches explicit values, and unfortunately in this case gitlink was being matched by just 'link', causing the wrong inline macro template to be applied. By renaming the macro, we can avoid being matched by the wrong regex. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-02-19fetch & clone: do not output progress when not on a ttyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-1/+4
This adds the option "--no-progress" to fetch-pack and upload-pack, and makes fetch and clone pass this option when stdout is not a tty. While at documenting that option, also document --strict and --timeout options for upload-pack. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-24rename --exec to --upload-pack for fetch-pack and peek-remoteLibravatar Uwe Kleine-König1-2/+5
Just some option name disambiguation. This is the counter part to commit d23842fd which made a similar change for push and send-pack. --exec continues to work. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-19Update documentation of fetch-pack, push and send-packLibravatar Uwe Kleine-König1-4/+17
add all supported options to Documentation/git-....txt and the usage strings. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <zeisberg@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-17Documentation: suggest corresponding Porcelain-level in plumbing docs.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
Instead of keeping the confused end user reading low-level documentation, suggest the higher level commands that implement what the user may want to do using them upfront. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-11-03improve fetch-pack's handling of kept packsLibravatar Nicolas Pitre1-1/+2
Since functions in fetch-clone.c were only used from fetch-pack.c, its content has been merged with fetch-pack.c. This allows for better coupling of features with much simpler implementations. One new thing is that the (abscence of) --thin also enforce it on index-pack now, such that index-pack will abort if a thin pack was _not_ asked for. The -k or --keep, when provided twice, now causes the fetched pack to be left as a kept pack just like receive-pack currently does. Eventually this will be used to close a race against concurrent repacking. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-09Remove trailing dot after short descriptionLibravatar Fredrik Kuivinen1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-05git/Documentation: fix SYNOPSIS style bugsLibravatar Dmitry V. Levin1-1/+1
This trivial patch fixes SYNOPSIS style bugs. Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-12-17fetch-pack: -k option to keep downloaded pack.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+6
Split out the functions that deal with the socketpair after finishing git protocol handshake to receive the packed data into a separate file, and use it in fetch-pack to keep/explode the received pack data. We earlier had something like that on clone-pack side once, but the list discussion resulted in the decision that it makes sense to always keep the pack for clone-pack, so unpacking option is not enabled on the clone-pack side, but we later still could do so easily if we wanted to with this change. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-10Convert usage of GIT and Git into gitLibravatar Christian Meder1-1/+1
Convert usage of GIT and Git into git. Signed-off-by: Christian Meder <chris@absolutegiganten.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-10-10Remove the version tags from the manpagesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+0
Signed-off-by: Christian Meder <chris@absolutegiganten.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-20[PATCH] Documentation: Update all files to use the new gitlink: macroLibravatar Sergey Vlasov1-1/+1
The replacement was performed automatically by these commands: perl -pi -e 's/link:(git.+)\.html\[\1\]/gitlink:$1\[1\]/g' \ README Documentation/*.txt perl -pi -e 's/link:git\.html\[git\]/gitlink:git\[7\]/g' \ README Documentation/*.txt Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-12fetch-pack: start multi-head pulling.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-11/+7
This is a beginning of resurrecting the multi-head pulling support for git-fetch-pack command. The git-fetch-script wrapper still only knows about fetching a single head, without renaming, so it is not very useful unless you directly call git-fetch-pack itself yet. It also fixes a longstanding obsolete description of how the command discovers the list of local commits.
2005-07-14[PATCH] Documentation: clone/fetch/upload.Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+73
This adds documentation for 'smarter pull' family of commands. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>