summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-10-17Merge branch 'jc/doc-checkout'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-14/+16
Doc update. * jc/doc-checkout: checkout doc: clarify command line args for "checkout paths" mode
2017-10-11checkout doc: clarify command line args for "checkout paths" modeLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-14/+16
There are "git checkout [-p][<tree-ish>][--][<paths>...]" in the SYNOPSIS section, and "git checkout [-p][<tree-ish>][--]<paths>..." as the header for the section that explains the "check out paths from index/tree-ish" mode. It is unclear if we require at least one path, or it is entirely optional. Actually, both are wrong. Without the "-p(atch)" option, you must have <pathspec> (otherwise, with a commit that is a <tree-ish>, you would be checking out that commit to build a new history on top of it). With it, it is already clear that you are checking out paths, it is optional. In other words, you cannot omit both. The source of the confusion is that -p(atch) is described as if it is just another "optional" part and its description is lumped together with the non patch mode, even though the actual end user experience is vastly different. Let's split the entry into two, and describe the regular mode and the patch mode separately. This allows us to make it clear that the regular mode MUST be given at least one pathspec, that the patch mode can be invoked with either '-p' or '--patch' but one of these must be given, and that the pathspec is entirely optional in the patch mode. Also, revamp the explanation of "checkout paths" by removing extraneous description at the beginning, that says "checking out paths is not checking out a branch". Explaining what it is for and when the user wants to use it upfront is the most direct way to help the readers. Noticed-by: Robert P J Day Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-14doc: fix minor typos (extra/duplicated words)Libravatar Evan Zacks1-1/+1
Following are several fixes for duplicated words ("of of") and one case where an extra article ("a") slipped in. Signed-off-by: Evan Zacks <zackse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-03-16builtin/checkout: add --recurse-submodules switchLibravatar Stefan Beller1-0/+7
This exposes a flag to recurse into submodules in builtin/checkout making use of the code implemented in prior patches. A new failure mode is introduced in the submodule update library, as the directory/submodule conflict is not solved in prior patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-21checkout.txt: document a common case that ignores ambiguation rulesLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+12
Normally we err on the safe side: if something can be seen as both an SHA1 and a pathspec, we stop and scream. In checkout, there is one exception added in 859fdab (git-checkout: improve error messages, detect ambiguities. - 2008-07-23), to allow the common case "git checkout branch". Let's document this exception. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28doc: typeset short command-line options as literalLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-2/+2
It was common in our documentation to surround short option names with forward quotes, which renders as italic in HTML. Instead, use backquotes which renders as monospace. This is one more step toward conformance to Documentation/CodingGuidelines. This was obtained with: perl -pi -e "s/'(-[a-z])'/\`\$1\`/g" *.txt Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-01checkout: add --progress optionLibravatar Edmundo Carmona Antoranz1-0/+6
Under normal circumstances, and like other git commands, git checkout will write progress info to stderr if attached to a terminal. This option allows progress to be forced even if not using a terminal. Also, progress can be skipped if using option --no-progress. Signed-off-by: Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-03Merge branch 'se/doc-checkout-ours-theirs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+15
A "rebase" replays changes of the local branch on top of something else, as such they are placed in stage #3 and referred to as "theirs", while the changes in the new base, typically a foreign work, are placed in stage #2 and referred to as "ours". Clarify the "checkout --ours/--theirs". * se/doc-checkout-ours-theirs: checkout: document subtlety around --ours/--theirs
2015-07-13Merge branch 'es/worktree-add'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-72/+0
Update to the "linked checkout" in 2.5.0-rc1. Instead of "checkout --to" that does not do what "checkout" normally does, move the functionality to "git worktree add". * es/worktree-add: (24 commits) Revert "checkout: retire --ignore-other-worktrees in favor of --force" checkout: retire --ignore-other-worktrees in favor of --force worktree: add: auto-vivify new branch when <branch> is omitted worktree: add: make -b/-B default to HEAD when <branch> is omitted worktree: extract basename computation to new function checkout: require worktree unconditionally checkout: retire --to option tests: worktree: retrofit "checkout --to" tests for "worktree add" worktree: add -b/-B options worktree: add --detach option worktree: add --force option worktree: introduce "add" command checkout: drop 'checkout_opts' dependency from prepare_linked_checkout checkout: make --to unconditionally verbose checkout: prepare_linked_checkout: drop now-unused 'new' argument checkout: relocate --to's "no branch specified" check checkout: fix bug with --to and relative HEAD Documentation/git-worktree: add EXAMPLES section Documentation/git-worktree: add high-level 'lock' overview Documentation/git-worktree: split technical info from general description ...
2015-07-12Revert "checkout: retire --ignore-other-worktrees in favor of --force"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+6
This reverts commit 0d1a1517835a10818f2d40d8780a268dbb5e20ce. When trying to switch to a different branch, that happens to be checked out in another working tree, the user shouldn't have to give up the other safety measures (like protecting the local changes that overlap the difference between the branches) while defeating the "no two checkouts of the same branch" safety. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-12checkout: document subtlety around --ours/--theirsLibravatar Simon A. Eugster1-0/+15
During a 'rebase' (hence 'pull --rebase'), --ours/--theirs may appear to be swapped to those who are not aware of the fact that they are temporarily playing the role of the keeper of the more authoritative history. Add a note to clarify. Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Simon A. Eugster <simon.eugster@eps.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-10Merge branch 'tb/checkout-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
Doc update. * tb/checkout-doc: git-checkout.txt: document "git checkout <pathspec>" better
2015-07-07checkout: retire --ignore-other-worktrees in favor of --forceLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-6/+3
As a safeguard, checking out a branch already checked out by a different worktree is disallowed. This behavior can be overridden with --ignore-other-worktrees, however, this option is neither obvious nor particularly discoverable. As a common safeguard override, --force is more likely to come to mind. Therefore, overload it to also suppress the check for a branch already checked out elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-06checkout: retire --to optionLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-7/+0
Now that "git worktree add" has achieved user-facing feature-parity with "git checkout --to", retire the latter. Move the actual linked worktree creation functionality, prepare_linked_checkout() and its helpers, verbatim from checkout.c to worktree.c. This effectively reverts changes to checkout.c by 529fef2 (checkout: support checking out into a new working directory, 2014-11-30) with the exception of merge_working_tree() and switch_branches() which still require specialized knowledge that a the checkout is occurring in a newly-created linked worktree (signaled to them by the private GIT_CHECKOUT_NEW_WORKTREE environment variable). Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-06Documentation: move linked worktree description from checkout to worktreeLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-67/+2
Now that the git-worktree command exists, its documentation page is the natural place for the linked worktree description to reside. Relocate the "MULTIPLE WORKING TREES" description verbatim from git-checkout.txt to git-worktree.txt. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-06Documentation/git-checkout: fix incorrect worktree prune commandLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-1/+1
This was missed when "git prune --worktrees" became "git worktree prune". Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-17git-checkout.txt: document "git checkout <pathspec>" betterLibravatar Torsten Bögershausen1-1/+5
git checkout <pathspec> can be used to reset changes in the working tree. Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-11Merge branch 'nd/multiple-work-trees'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+78
A replacement for contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir that does not rely on symbolic links and make sharing of objects and refs safer by making the borrowee and borrowers aware of each other. * nd/multiple-work-trees: (41 commits) prune --worktrees: fix expire vs worktree existence condition t1501: fix test with split index t2026: fix broken &&-chain t2026 needs procondition SANITY git-checkout.txt: a note about multiple checkout support for submodules checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees checkout: pass whole struct to parse_branchname_arg instead of individual flags git-common-dir: make "modules/" per-working-directory directory checkout: do not fail if target is an empty directory t2025: add a test to make sure grafts is working from a linked checkout checkout: don't require a work tree when checking out into a new one git_path(): keep "info/sparse-checkout" per work-tree count-objects: report unused files in $GIT_DIR/worktrees/... gc: support prune --worktrees gc: factor out gc.pruneexpire parsing code gc: style change -- no SP before closing parenthesis checkout: clean up half-prepared directories in --to mode checkout: reject if the branch is already checked out elsewhere prune: strategies for linked checkouts checkout: support checking out into a new working directory ...
2015-03-13*config.txt: stick to camelCase naming conventionLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-2/+2
This should improve readability. Compare "thislongname" and "thisLongName". The following keys are left in unchanged. We can decide what to do with them later. - am.keepcr - core.autocrlf .safecrlf .trustctime - diff.dirstat .noprefix - gitcvs.usecrlfattr - gui.blamehistoryctx .trustmtime - pull.twohead - receive.autogc - sendemail.signedoffbycc .smtpsslcertpath .suppresscc Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-07git-checkout.txt: a note about multiple checkout support for submodulesLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+3
The goal seems to be using multiple checkouts to reduce disk space. But we have not reached an agreement how things should be. There are a couple options. - You may want to keep $SUB repos elsewhere (perhaps in a central place) outside $SUPER. This is also true for nested submodules where a superproject may be a submodule of another superproject. - You may want to keep all $SUB repos in $SUPER/modules (or some other place in $SUPER) - We could even push it further and merge all $SUB repos into $SUPER instead of storing them separately. But that would at least require ref namespace enabled. On top of that, git-submodule.sh expects $GIT_DIR/config to be per-worktree, at least for the submodule.* part. Here I think we have two options, either update config.c to also read $GIT_DIR/config.worktree (which is per worktree) in addition to $GIT_DIR/config (shared) and store worktree-specific vars in the new place, or update git-submodule.sh to read/write submodule.* directly from $GIT_DIR/config.submodule (per worktree). These take time to address properly. Meanwhile, make a note to the user that they should not use multiple worktrees in submodule context. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-07checkout: add --ignore-other-wortreesLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+6
Noticed-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-01gc: support prune --worktreesLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-4/+7
Helped-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-01prune: strategies for linked checkoutsLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+20
(alias R=$GIT_COMMON_DIR/worktrees/<id>) - linked checkouts are supposed to keep its location in $R/gitdir up to date. The use case is auto fixup after a manual checkout move. - linked checkouts are supposed to update mtime of $R/gitdir. If $R/gitdir's mtime is older than a limit, and it points to nowhere, worktrees/<id> is to be pruned. - If $R/locked exists, worktrees/<id> is not supposed to be pruned. If $R/locked exists and $R/gitdir's mtime is older than a really long limit, warn about old unused repo. - "git checkout --to" is supposed to make a hard link named $R/link pointing to the .git file on supported file systems to help detect the user manually deleting the checkout. If $R/link exists and its link count is greated than 1, the repo is kept. Helped-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-01checkout: support checking out into a new working directoryLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+46
"git checkout --to" sets up a new working directory with a .git file pointing to $GIT_DIR/worktrees/<id>. It then executes "git checkout" again on the new worktree with the same arguments except "--to" is taken out. The second checkout execution, which is not contaminated with any info from the current repository, will actually check out and everything that normal "git checkout" does. Helped-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-21Documentation: @{-N} can refer to a commitLibravatar Thomas Rast1-2/+2
The @{-N} syntax always referred to the N-th last thing checked out, which can be either a branch or a commit (for detached HEAD cases). However, the documentation only mentioned branches. Edit in a "/commit" in the appropriate places. Reported-by: Kevin <ikke@ikke.info> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-11checkout: update synopsys and documentation on detaching HEADLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+8
In the synopsis, the second form to detach HEAD at the named commit labelled the argument as '<commit>'. While this is technically more correct, because the feature to detach is not limited to the tip of a named branch, it was found confusing and did not express the fact that you have to give `--detach` if you are naming the commit you want to detach HEAD at with a branch name. Separate this case into two syntactical forms, mimicking the way how the DESCRIPTION section shows this usage. Also update the text that explains the syntax to name the commit to detach HEAD at to clarify. Suggested-by: Benjamin Bergman <ben@benbergman.ca> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-29Merge branch 'jh/checkout-auto-tracking'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Update "git checkout foo" that DWIMs the intended "upstream" and turns it into "git checkout -t -b foo remotes/origin/foo" to correctly take existing remote definitions into account. The remote "origin" may be what uniquely map its own branch to remotes/some/where/foo but that some/where may not be "origin". * jh/checkout-auto-tracking: glossary: Update and rephrase the definition of a remote-tracking branch branch.c: Validate tracking branches with refspecs instead of refs/remotes/* t9114.2: Don't use --track option against "svn-remote"-tracking branches t7201.24: Add refspec to keep --track working t3200.39: tracking setup should fail if there is no matching refspec. checkout: Use remote refspecs when DWIMming tracking branches t2024: Show failure to use refspec when DWIMming remote branch names t2024: Add tests verifying current DWIM behavior of 'git checkout <branch>'
2013-04-21checkout: Use remote refspecs when DWIMming tracking branchesLibravatar Johan Herland1-3/+3
The DWIM mode of checkout allows you to run "git checkout foo" when there is no existing local ref or path called "foo", and there is exactly _one_ remote with a remote-tracking branch called "foo". Git will automatically create a new local branch called "foo" using the remote-tracking "foo" as its starting point and configured upstream. For example, consider the following unconventional (but perfectly valid) remote setup: [remote "origin"] fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* [remote "frotz"] fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/* Case 1: Assume both "origin" and "frotz" have remote-tracking branches called "foo", at "refs/remotes/origin/foo" and "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo" respectively. In this case "git checkout foo" should fail, because there is more than one remote with a "foo" branch. Case 2: Assume only "frotz" have a remote-tracking branch called "foo". In this case "git checkout foo" should succeed, and create a local branch "foo" from "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo", using remote branch "foo" from "frotz" as its upstream. The current code hardcodes the assumption that all remote-tracking branches must match the "refs/remotes/$remote/*" pattern (which is true for remotes with "conventional" refspecs, but not true for the "frotz" remote above). When running "git checkout foo", the current code looks for exactly one ref matching "refs/remotes/*/foo", hence in the above example, it fails to find "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo", which causes it to fail both case #1 and #2. The better way to handle the above example is to actually study the fetch refspecs to deduce the candidate remote-tracking branches for "foo"; i.e. assume "foo" is a remote branch being fetched, and then map "refs/heads/foo" through the refspecs in order to get the corresponding remote-tracking branches "refs/remotes/origin/foo" and "refs/remotes/frotz/nitfol/foo". Finally we check which of these happens to exist in the local repo, and if there is exactly one, we have an unambiguous match for "git checkout foo", and may proceed. This fixes most of the failing tests introduced in the previous patch. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-15checkout: add --ignore-skip-worktree-bits in sparse checkout modeLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+6
"git checkout -- <paths>" is usually used to restore all modified files in <paths>. In sparse checkout mode, this command is overloaded with another meaning: to add back all files in <paths> that are excluded by sparse patterns. As the former makes more sense for day-to-day use. Switch it to the default and the latter enabled with --ignore-skip-worktree-bits. While at there, add info/sparse-checkout to gitrepository-layout.txt Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-01Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git'Libravatar Thomas Ackermann1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-18Documentation/git-checkout.txt: document 70c9ac2 behaviorLibravatar Chris Rorvick1-0/+8
Document the behavior implemented in 70c9ac2 (DWIM "git checkout frotz" to "git checkout -b frotz origin/frotz"). Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-12-18Documentation/git-checkout.txt: clarify usageLibravatar Chris Rorvick1-10/+33
The forms of checkout that do not take a path are lumped together in the DESCRIPTION section, but the description for this group is dominated by explanation of the -b|-B form. Split these apart for more clarity. Signed-off-by: Chris Rorvick <chris@rorvick.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-12Merge branch 'jc/maint-checkout-fileglob-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Updated with help from Peff. * jc/maint-checkout-fileglob-doc: gitcli: contrast wildcard given to shell and to git gitcli: formatting fix Document file-glob for "git checkout -- '*.c'"
2012-09-07Merge branch 'jc/maint-doc-checkout-b-always-takes-branch-name'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
The synopsis said "checkout [-B branch]" to make it clear the branch name is a parameter to the option, but the heading for the option description was "-B::", not "-B branch::", making the documentation misleading. There may be room in documentation pages of other commands for similar improvements. * jc/maint-doc-checkout-b-always-takes-branch-name: doc: "git checkout -b/-B/--orphan" always takes a branch name
2012-09-04Document file-glob for "git checkout -- '*.c'"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Just like we give a similar example in "git add" documentation. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-26doc: "git checkout -b/-B/--orphan" always takes a branch nameLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
While the synopsis section makes it clear that the new branch name is the parameter to these flags, the option description did not. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-26docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literalLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+4
In asciidoc 7, backticks like `foo` produced a typographic effect, but did not otherwise affect the syntax. In asciidoc 8, backticks introduce an "inline literal" inside which markup is not interpreted. To keep compatibility with existing documents, asciidoc 8 has a "no-inline-literal" attribute to keep the old behavior. We enabled this so that the documentation could be built on either version. It has been several years now, and asciidoc 7 is no longer in wide use. We can now decide whether or not we want inline literals on their own merits, which are: 1. The source is much easier to read when the literal contains punctuation. You can use `master~1` instead of `master{tilde}1`. 2. They are less error-prone. Because of point (1), we tend to make mistakes and forget the extra layer of quoting. This patch removes the no-inline-literal attribute from the Makefile and converts every use of backticks in the documentation to an inline literal (they must be cleaned up, or the example above would literally show "{tilde}" in the output). Problematic sites were found by grepping for '`.*[{\\]' and examined and fixed manually. The results were then verified by comparing the output of "html2text" on the set of generated html pages. Doing so revealed that in addition to making the source more readable, this patch fixes several formatting bugs: - HTML rendering used the ellipsis character instead of literal "..." in code examples (like "git log A...B") - some code examples used the right-arrow character instead of '->' because they failed to quote - api-config.txt did not quote tilde, and the resulting HTML contained a bogus snippet like: <tt><sub></tt> foo <tt></sub>bar</tt> which caused some parsers to choke and omit whole sections of the page. - git-commit.txt confused ``foo`` (backticks inside a literal) with ``foo'' (matched double-quotes) - mentions of `A U Thor <author@example.com>` used to erroneously auto-generate a mailto footnote for author@example.com - the description of --word-diff=plain incorrectly showed the output as "[-removed-] and {added}", not "{+added+}". - using "prime" notation like: commit `C` and its replacement `C'` confused asciidoc into thinking that everything between the first backtick and the final apostrophe were meant to be inside matched quotes - asciidoc got confused by the escaping of some of our asterisks. In particular, `credential.\*` and `credential.<url>.\*` properly escaped the asterisk in the first case, but literally passed through the backslash in the second case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-05git-checkout.txt: better docs for '--patch'Libravatar Valentin Haenel1-3/+4
Describe '-p' as a short form of '--patch' in synopsis and options. Also refer the reader to the patch mode description of git-add documentation. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Mentored-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Haenel <valentin.haenel@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-11doc: drop author/documentation sections from most pagesLibravatar Jeff King1-9/+0
The point of these sections is generally to: 1. Give credit where it is due. 2. Give the reader an idea of where to ask questions or file bug reports. But they don't do a good job of either case. For (1), they are out of date and incomplete. A much more accurate answer can be gotten through shortlog or blame. For (2), the correct contact point is generally git@vger, and even if you wanted to cc the contact point, the out-of-date and incomplete fields mean you're likely sending to somebody useless. So let's drop the fields entirely from all manpages except git(1) itself. We already point people to the mailing list for bug reports there, and we can update the Authors section to give credit to the major contributors and point to shortlog and blame for more information. Each page has a "This is part of git" footer, so people can follow that to the main git manpage.
2011-02-27Merge branch 'js/detach-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-23/+121
* js/detach-doc: git-checkout.txt: improve detached HEAD documentation
2011-02-27Merge branch 'uk/checkout-ambiguous-ref'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
* uk/checkout-ambiguous-ref: Rename t2019 with typo "amiguous" that meant "ambiguous" checkout: rearrange update_refs_for_switch for clarity checkout: introduce --detach synonym for "git checkout foo^{commit}" checkout: split off a function to peel away branchname arg checkout: fix bug with ambiguous refs Conflicts: builtin/checkout.c
2011-02-21git-checkout.txt: improve detached HEAD documentationLibravatar Jay Soffian1-23/+121
The detached HEAD state is a source of much confusion for users new to git. Here we try to document it better. Reworked from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/138440 Requested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net> Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-08checkout: introduce --detach synonym for "git checkout foo^{commit}"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+11
For example, one might use this when making a temporary merge to test that two topics work well together. Patch by Junio, with tests from Jeff King. [jn: with some extra checks for bogus commandline usage] Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking"Libravatar Matthieu Moy1-1/+1
"remote branch" is a branch hosted in a remote repository, while "remote-tracking branch" is a copy of such branch, hosted locally. The distinction is subtle when the copy is up-to-date, but rather fundamental to understand what "git fetch" and "git push" do. This patch should fix all incorrect usages in Documentation/ directory. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-27Fix missing 'does' in man-page for 'git checkout'Libravatar Linus Torvalds1-8/+8
Reported-by: Rainer Standke <rainer.standke@krankikom.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-20Documentation: do not convert ... operator to ellipsesLibravatar Jonathan Nieder1-1/+1
The symmetric difference or merge-base operator ... as used by rev-list and diff is actually three period characters. If it gets replaced by an ellipsis glyph in the manual, that would stop readers from copying and pasting it. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-18Merge branch 'tc/checkout-B'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+19
* tc/checkout-B: builtin/checkout: handle -B from detached HEAD correctly builtin/checkout: learn -B builtin/checkout: reword hint for -b add tests for checkout -b
2010-07-11Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Documentation: Spelling fix in protocol-capabilities.txt checkout: accord documentation to what git does t0005: work around strange $? in ksh when program terminated by a signal
2010-07-09checkout: accord documentation to what git doesLibravatar Nicolas Sebrecht1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s.dev@gmx.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25builtin/checkout: learn -BLibravatar Tay Ray Chuan1-2/+19
Internally, --track and --orphan still use the 'safe' -b, not -B. Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>