summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-check-ignore.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-03doc: check-ignore: code-quote an exclamation markLibravatar Philip Oakley1-2/+2
The plain quoted exclamation mark renders as italics in the Windows pdf help manual. Fix this with back-tick quoting and surrounding double quotes as exemplified by the gitignore.txt guide. While at it, fix the surrounding double quotes for the other special characters usages. Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-02Merge branch 'en/check-ignore'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+9
"git check-ignore" did not work when the given path is explicitly marked as not ignored with a negative entry in the .gitignore file. * en/check-ignore: check-ignore: fix documentation and implementation to match
2020-02-18check-ignore: fix documentation and implementation to matchLibravatar Elijah Newren1-3/+9
check-ignore has two different modes, and neither of these modes has an implementation that matches the documentation. These modes differ in whether they just print paths or whether they also print the final pattern matched by the path. The fix is different for both modes, so I'll discuss both separately. === First (default) mode === The first mode is documented as: For each pathname given via the command-line or from a file via --stdin, check whether the file is excluded by .gitignore (or other input files to the exclude mechanism) and output the path if it is excluded. However, it fails to do this because it did not account for negated patterns. Commands other than check-ignore verify exclusion rules via calling ... -> treat_one_path() -> is_excluded() -> last_matching_pattern() while check-ignore has a call path of the form: ... -> check_ignore() -> last_matching_pattern() The fact that the latter does not include the call to is_excluded() means that it is susceptible to to messing up negated patterns (since that is the only significant thing is_excluded() adds over last_matching_pattern()). Unfortunately, we can't make it just call is_excluded(), because the same codepath is used by the verbose mode which needs to know the matched pattern in question. This brings us to... === Second (verbose) mode === The second mode, known as verbose mode, references the first in the documentation and says: Also output details about the matching pattern (if any) for each given pathname. For precedence rules within and between exclude sources, see gitignore(5). The "Also" means it will print patterns that match the exclude rules as noted for the first mode, and also print which pattern matches. Unless more information is printed than just pathname and pattern (which is not done), this definition is somewhat ill-defined and perhaps even self-contradictory for negated patterns: A path which matches a negated exclude pattern is NOT excluded and thus shouldn't be printed by the former logic, while it certainly does match one of the explicit patterns and thus should be printed by the latter logic. === Resolution == Since the second mode exists to find out which pattern matches given paths, and showing the user a pattern that begins with a '!' is sufficient for them to figure out whether the pattern is excluded, the existing behavior is desirable -- we just need to update the documentation to match the implementation (i.e. it is about printing which pattern is matched by paths, not about showing which paths are excluded). For the first or default mode, users just want to know whether a pattern is excluded. As such, the existing documentation is desirable; change the implementation to match the documented behavior. Finally, also adjust a few tests in t0008 that were caught up by this discrepancy in how negated paths were handled. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-07Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and newLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+1
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-05-25Use proper syntax for replaceables in command docsLibravatar Robert P. J. Day1-2/+2
The standard for command documentation synopses appears to be: [...] means optional <...> means replaceable [<...>] means both optional and replaceable So fix a number of doc pages that use incorrect variations of the above. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-09Documentation: fix linkgit referencesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
There are a handful of incorrect "linkgit:<page>[<section>]" instances in our documentation set. * Some have an extra colon after "linkgit:"; fix them by removing the extra colon; * Some refer to a page outside the Git suite, namely curl(1); fix them by using the `curl(1)` that already appears on the same page for the same purpose of referring the readers to its manual page. * Some spell the name of the page incorrectly, e.g. "rev-list" when they mean "git-rev-list"; fix them. * Some list the manual section incorrectly; fix them to make sure they match what is at the top of the target of the link. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-03-18Revert "Merge branch 'nd/exclusion-regression-fix'"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+0
This reverts commit 5e57f9c3dfe7dd44a1b56bb5b3327d7a1356ec7c, reversing changes made to e79112d21024beb997951381db21a70b087d459d. We will be postponing nd/exclusion-regression-fix topic to later cycle.
2016-02-15dir.c: support tracing excludeLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-0/+1
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-24check-ignore: correct documentation about outputLibravatar Dennis Kaarsemaker1-5/+5
By default git check-ignore shows only the filenames that will be ignored, not the pattern that causes their exclusion. Instead of moving the partial exclude pattern precendence information to the -v option where it belongs, link to gitignore(5) which describes this more thoroughly. Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker <dennis@kaarsemaker.net> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-10-16usage: do not insist that standard input must come from a fileLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+3
The synopsys text and the usage string of subcommands that read list of things from the standard input are often shown like this: git gostak [--distim] < <list-of-doshes> This is problematic in a number of ways: * The way to use these commands is more often to feed them the output from another command, not feed them from a file. * Manual pages outside Git, commands that operate on the data read from the standard input, e.g "sort", "grep", "sed", etc., are not described with such a "< redirection-from-file" in their synopsys text. Our doing so introduces inconsistency. * We do not insist on where the output should go, by saying git gostak [--distim] < <list-of-doshes> > <output> * As it is our convention to enclose placeholders inside <braket>, the redirection operator followed by a placeholder filename becomes very hard to read, both in the documentation and in the help text. Let's clean them all up, after making sure that the documentation clearly describes the modes that take information from the standard input and what kind of things are expected on the input. [jc: stole example for fmt-merge-msg from Jonathan] Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13*config.txt: stick to camelCase naming conventionLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+1
This should improve readability. Compare "thislongname" and "thisLongName". The following keys are left in unchanged. We can decide what to do with them later. - am.keepcr - core.autocrlf .safecrlf .trustctime - diff.dirstat .noprefix - gitcvs.usecrlfattr - gui.blamehistoryctx .trustmtime - pull.twohead - receive.autogc - sendemail.signedoffbycc .smtpsslcertpath .suppresscc Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-12-04check-ignore: clarify treatment of tracked filesLibravatar Michael J Gruber1-0/+3
By default, check-ignore does not list tracked files at all since they are not subject to ignore patterns. Make this clearer in the man page. Reported-by: Guilherme <guibufolo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-12check-ignore: Add option to ignore index contentsLibravatar Dave Williams1-0/+7
check-ignore currently shows how .gitignore rules would treat untracked paths. Tracked paths do not generate useful output. This prevents debugging of why a path became tracked unexpectedly unless that path is first removed from the index with `git rm --cached <path>`. The option --no-index tells the command to bypass the check for the path being in the index and hence allows tracked paths to be checked too. Whilst this behaviour deviates from the characteristics of `git add` and `git status` its use case is unlikely to cause any user confusion. Test scripts are augmented to check this option against the standard ignores to ensure correct behaviour. Signed-off-by: Dave Williams <dave@opensourcesolutions.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-30Merge branch 'maint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* maint: Start preparing for 1.8.3.3 check-ignore doc: fix broken link to ls-files page test: spell 'ls-files --delete' option correctly in test descriptions
2013-06-30check-ignore doc: fix broken link to ls-files pageLibravatar Ramkumar Ramachandra1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-11Documentation: add caveats about I/O buffering for check-{attr,ignore}Libravatar Adam Spiers1-0/+5
check-attr and check-ignore have the potential to deadlock callers which do not read back the output in real-time. For example, if a caller writes N paths out and then reads N lines back in, it risks becoming blocked on write() to check-*, and check-* is blocked on write back to the caller. Somebody has to buffer; the pipe buffers provide some leeway, but they are limited. Thanks to Peff for pointing this out: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/220534 Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-11check-ignore: add -n / --non-matching optionLibravatar Adam Spiers1-0/+15
If `-n` or `--non-matching` are specified, non-matching pathnames will also be output, in which case all fields in each output record except for <pathname> will be empty. This can be useful when running check-ignore as a background process, so that files can be incrementally streamed to STDIN, and for each of these files, STDOUT will indicate whether that file matched a pattern or not. (Without this option, it would be impossible to tell whether the absence of output for a given file meant that it didn't match any pattern, or that the result simply hadn't been flushed to STDOUT yet.) Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-06add git-check-ignore sub-commandLibravatar Adam Spiers1-0/+89
This works in a similar manner to git-check-attr. Thanks to Jeff King and Junio C Hamano for the idea: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/108671/focus=108815 Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>