summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/CodingGuidelines
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-21C99: remove hardcoded-out !HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS codeLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-0/+3
Remove the "else" branches of the HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS macro, which have been unconditionally omitted since 765dc168882 (git-compat-util: always enable variadic macros, 2021-01-28). Since were always omitted, anyone trying to use a compiler without variadic macro support to compile a git since version git v2.31.0 or later would have had a compilation error. 10 months across a few releases since then should have been enough time for anyone who cared to run into that and report the issue. In addition to that, for anyone unsetting HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS we've been emitting extremely verbose warnings since at least ee4512ed481 (trace2: create new combined trace facility, 2019-02-22). That's because there is no such thing as a "region_enter_printf" or "region_leave_printf" format, so at least under GCC and Clang everything that includes trace.h (almost every file) emits a couple of warnings about that. There's a large benefit to being able to have a hard dependency rely on variadic macros, the code surrounding usage.c is hard to maintain if we need to write two implementations of everything, and by relying on "__FILE__" and "__LINE__" along with "__VA_ARGS__" we can in the future make error(), die() etc. log where they were called from. We've also recently merged d67fc4bf0ba (Merge branch 'bc/require-c99', 2021-12-10) which further cements our hard dependency on C99. So let's delete the fallback code, and update our CodingGuidelines to note that we depend on this. The added bullet-point starts with lower-case for consistency with other bullet-points in that section. The diff in "trace.h" is relatively hard to read, since we need to retain the existing API docs, which were comments on the code used if HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS was not defined. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-01-27CodingGuidelines: hint why we value clearly written log messagesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+7
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-04CodingGuidelines: document which output goes to stdout vs. stderrLibravatar Eric Sunshine1-0/+27
It has long been practice on this project for a command to emit its primary output to stdout so that it can be captured to a file or sent down a pipe, and to emit "chatty" messages (such as those reporting progress) to stderr so that they don't interfere with the primary output. However, this practice is not necessarily universal; another common practice is to send only error messages to stderr, and all other messages to stdout. Therefore, help newcomers out by documenting how stdout and stderr are used on this project. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-28Merge branch 'ds/gender-neutral-doc-guidelines'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+45
A guideline for gender neutral documentation has been added. * ds/gender-neutral-doc-guidelines: CodingGuidelines: recommend gender-neutral description
2021-07-16CodingGuidelines: recommend gender-neutral descriptionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+45
Technical writing seeks to convey information with minimal friction. One way that a reader can experience friction is if they encounter a description of "a user" that is later simplified using a gendered pronoun. If the reader does not consider that pronoun to apply to them, then they can experience cognitive dissonance that removes focus from the information. Give some basic tips to guide us avoid unnecessary uses of gendered description. Using a gendered pronoun is appropriate when referring to a specific person. There are acceptable existing uses of gendered pronouns within the Git codebase, such as: * References to real people (e.g. Linus Torvalds, "the Git maintainer"). Do not misgender real people. If there is any doubt to the gender of a person, then avoid using pronouns. * References to fictional people with clear genders (e.g. Alice and Bob). * Sample text used in test cases (e.g t3702, t6432). * The official text of the GPL license contains uses of "he or she", but using singular "they" (or modifying the text in some other way) is not within the scope of the Git project. * Literal email messages in Documentation/howto/ should not be edited for grammatical concerns such as this, unless we update the entire document to fit the standard documentation format. If such an effort is taken on, then the authorship would change and no longer refer to the exact mail message. * External projects consumed in contrib/ should not deviate solely for style reasons. Recommended edits should be contributed to those projects directly. Other cases within the Git project were cleaned up by the previous changes. Co-authored-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-05-11Merge branch 'jc/test-allows-local'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
Document that our test can use "local" keyword. * jc/test-allows-local: CodingGuidelines: explicitly allow "local" for test scripts
2021-05-03CodingGuidelines: explicitly allow "local" for test scriptsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
01d3a526 (t0000: check whether the shell supports the "local" keyword, 2017-10-26) raised a test balloon to see if those who build and test Git use a platform with a shell that lacks support for the "local" keyword. After two years, 7f0b5908 (t0000: reword comments for "local" test, 2019-08-08) documented that "local" keyword, even though is outside POSIX, is allowed in our test scripts. Let's write it in the CodingGuidelines, too. It might be tempting to allow it in scripted Porcelains (we have avoided getting them contaminiated by "local" so far), but they are on their way out and getting rewritten in C. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-14doc: clarify "do not capitalize the first word" ruleLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+6
The same "do not capitalize the first word" rule is applied to both our patch titles and error messages, but the existing description was fuzzy in two aspects. * For error messages, it was not said that this was only about the first word that begins the sentence. * For both, it was not clear when a capital letter there was not an error. We avoid capitalizing the first word when the only reason you would capitalize it is because it happens to be the first word in the sentence. If a proper noun, which is usually spelled in capital letters, happens to come at the beginning of the sentence, it should be kept in capital letters. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-17Merge branch 'dl/python-2.7-is-the-floor-version'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-6/+1
Document that we do not support Python 2.6 or older. * dl/python-2.7-is-the-floor-version: CodingGuidelines: specify Python 2.7 is the oldest version
2020-06-08CodingGuidelines: specify Python 2.7 is the oldest versionLibravatar Denton Liu1-6/+1
In 0b4396f068 (git-p4: make python2.7 the oldest supported version, 2019-12-13), git-p4 was updated to only support 2.7 and newer. Since Python 2.6 is pretty much ancient history, update CodingGuidelines to show that 2.7 is the oldest version supported. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-14Merge branch 'jc/codingstyle-compare-with-null'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Doc update. * jc/codingstyle-compare-with-null: CodingGuidelines: do not ==/!= compare with 0 or '\0' or NULL
2020-05-08Merge branch 'jk/arith-expansion-coding-guidelines'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-4/+0
The coding guideline for shell scripts instructed to refer to a variable with dollar-sign inside arithmetic expansion to work around a bug in old versions of dash, which is a thing of the past. Now we are not forbidden from writing $((var+1)). * jk/arith-expansion-coding-guidelines: CodingGuidelines: drop arithmetic expansion advice to use "$x"
2020-05-08CodingGuidelines: do not ==/!= compare with 0 or '\0' or NULLLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+12
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-04CodingGuidelines: drop arithmetic expansion advice to use "$x"Libravatar Jeff King1-4/+0
The advice to use "$x" rather than "x" in arithmetric expansion was working around a dash bug fixed in 0.5.4. Even Debian oldstable has 0.5.8 these days. And in the meantime, we've added almost two dozen instances of the "x" form which you can find with: git grep '$(([a-z]' and nobody seems to have complained. Let's declare this workaround obsolete and simplify our style guide. Helped-by: Danh Doan <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-22Merge branch 'jc/allow-strlen-substitution-in-shell-scripts'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
Coding guideline update. * jc/allow-strlen-substitution-in-shell-scripts: CodingGuidelines: allow ${#posix} == strlen($posix)
2020-03-29CodingGuidelines: allow ${#posix} == strlen($posix)Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+0
The construct has been in POSIX for the past 10+ years, and we have used in t9xxx (subversion) series of the tests, so we know it is at portable across systems that people have run those tests, which is almost everything we'd care about. Let's loosen the rule; luckily, the check-non-portable-shell script does not have any rule to find its use, so the only change needed is a removal of one paragraph from the documentation. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-07Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and newLibravatar Elijah Newren1-2/+2
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-25Merge branch 'jc/post-c89-rules-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+23
We have been trying out a few language features outside c89; the coding guidelines document did not talk about them and instead had a blanket ban against them. * jc/post-c89-rules-doc: CodingGuidelines: spell out post-C89 rules
2019-07-18CodingGuidelines: spell out post-C89 rulesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+23
Even though we have been sticking to C89, there are a few handy features we borrow from more recent C language in our codebase after trying them in weather balloons and saw that nobody screamed. Spell them out. While at it, extend the existing variable declaration rule a bit to read better with the newly spelled out rule for the for loop. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-17Merge branch 'es/git-debugger-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
Doc update. * es/git-debugger-doc: doc: hint about GIT_DEBUGGER in CodingGuidelines
2019-05-28doc: hint about GIT_DEBUGGER in CodingGuidelinesLibravatar Emily Shaffer1-0/+6
We check for a handy environment variable GIT_DEBUGGER when running via bin-wrappers/, but this feature is undocumented. Add a hint to how to use it into the CodingGuidelines (which is where other useful environment settings like DEVELOPER are documented). Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-13doc/CodingGuidelines: URLs and paths as monospaceLibravatar Corentin BOMPARD1-2/+5
The current documentation uses both quotes (italics) and backquotes (monospace) to render URLs and pathnames, which is inconsistent. Document a best practice in CodingGuidelines to help reduce inconsistencies in the future. We set the best practice to using backquotes, since: * It is already an established practice. For exemple: $ git grep "'[^']/*[^']'" | wc -l 206 $ git grep '`[^`]/*[^`]`' | wc -l 690 There are false positives on both sides, but after a cursory look at the output of both, it doesn't seem the false positive rate is really higher in the second case. At least, this shows that the existing documentation uses inconsistent formatting, and that it would be good to do something about it. * It may be debatable whether path names need to be typed in monospace but having them in italics is really unusual. Signed-off-by: Corentin BOMPARD <corentin.bompard@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Nathan BERBEZIER <nathan.berbezier@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Pablo CHABANNE <pablo.chabanne@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu MOY <matthieu.moy@univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19Merge branch 'jc/how-to-document-api'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+4
Doc update. * jc/how-to-document-api: CodingGuidelines: document the API in *.h files
2018-10-07Documentation: add shell guidelinesLibravatar Matthew DeVore1-0/+18
Add the following guideline to Documentation/CodingGuidelines: Break overlong lines after "&&", "||", and "|", not before them; that way the command can continue to subsequent lines without backslash at the end. And the following to t/README (since it is specific to writing tests): Pipes and $(git ...) should be avoided when they swallow exit codes of Git processes Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-29CodingGuidelines: document the API in *.h filesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+4
It makes it harder to let the API description and the reality drift apart if the doc is kept close to the implementation or the header of the API. We have been slowly migrating API docs out of the Documentation/technical/api-* to *.h files, and the development community generally considers that how inline docs in strbuf.h is done the best current practice. We recommend documenting in the header over documenting near the implementation to encourage people to write the docs that are readable without peeking at the implemention. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-08CodingGuidelines: mention "static" and "extern"Libravatar Jeff King1-0/+5
It perhaps goes without saying that file-local stuff should be marked static, but it does not hurt to remind people. Less obvious is that we are settling on "do not include extern in function declarations". It is already the default unless the function was previously declared static (but if you are following a static declaration with an unmarked one, you should think about why you are declaring the thing twice). And so it just becomes an extra noise-word in our header files. We used to give the opposite advice, so there are quite a few "extern" markers in early Git code. But this at least makes a concrete suggestion that we can follow going forward. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-04Merge branch 'ab/c-translators-comment-style'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+5
Update the C style recommendation for notes for translators, as recent versions of gettext tools can work with our style of multi-line comments. * ab/c-translators-comment-style: C style: use standard style for "TRANSLATORS" comments
2017-05-31C style: use standard style for "TRANSLATORS" commentsLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-5/+5
Change all the "TRANSLATORS: [...]" comments in the C code to use the regular Git coding style, and amend the style guide so that the example there uses that style. This custom style was necessary back in 2010 when the gettext support was initially added, and was subsequently documented in commit cbcfd4e3ea ("i18n: mention "TRANSLATORS:" marker in Documentation/CodingGuidelines", 2014-04-18). GNU xgettext hasn't had the parsing limitation that necessitated this exception for almost 3 years. Since its 0.19 release on 2014-06-02 it's been able to recognize TRANSLATOR comments in the standard Git comment syntax[1]. Usually we'd like to keep compatibility with software that's that young, but in this case literally the only person who needs to be using a gettext newer than 3 years old is Jiang Xin (the only person who runs & commits "make pot" results), so I think in this case we can make an exception. This xgettext parsing feature was added after a thread on the Git mailing list[2] which continued on the bug-gettext[3] list, but we never subsequently changed our style & styleguide, do so. There are already longstanding changes in git that use the standard comment style & have their TRANSLATORS comments extracted properly without getting the literal "*"'s mixed up in the text, as would happen before xgettext 0.19. Commit 7ff2683253 ("builtin-am: implement -i/--interactive", 2015-08-04) added one such comment, which in commit df0617bfa7 ("l10n: git.pot: v2.6.0 round 1 (123 new, 41 removed)", 2015-09-05) got picked up in the po/git.pot file with the right format, showing that Jiang already runs a modern xgettext. The xgettext parser does not handle the sort of non-standard comment style that I'm amending here in sequencer.c, but that isn't standard Git comment syntax anyway. With this change to sequencer.c & "make pot" the comment in the pot file is now correct: #. TRANSLATORS: %s will be "revert", "cherry-pick" or -#. * "rebase -i". +#. "rebase -i". 1. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/commit/?id=10af7fe6bd 2. <2ce9ec406501d112e032c8208417f8100bed04c6.1397712142.git.worldhello.net@gmail.com> (https://public-inbox.org/git/2ce9ec406501d112e032c8208417f8100bed04c6.1397712142.git.worldhello.net@gmail.com/) 3. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2014-04/msg00016.html Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-08doc: replace a couple of broken gmane linksLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Replace a couple of broken links to gmane with links to other archives. See commit 54471fdcc3 ("README: replace gmane link with public-inbox", 2016-12-15) for prior art. With this change there's still 4 references left in the code: $ git grep -E '(article|thread)\.gmane.org' -- |grep -v RelNotes|wc -l 4 I couldn't find alternative links for those. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-01-17CodingGuidelines: clarify multi-line brace styleLibravatar Jeff King1-5/+32
There are some "gray areas" around when to omit braces from a conditional or loop body. Since that seems to have resulted in some arguments, let's be a little more clear about our preferred style. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28CodingGuidelines: formatting HEAD in documentationLibravatar Matthieu Moy1-2/+3
The current practice is: git/Documentation$ git grep "'HEAD'" | wc -l 24 git/Documentation$ git grep "\`HEAD\`" | wc -l 66 Let's adopt the majority as a guideline. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-08doc: clearer rule about formatting literalsLibravatar Tom Russello1-3/+10
Make the guideline text that we want for our documentation clearer. Signed-off-by: Tom Russello <tom.russello@grenoble-inp.org> Signed-off-by: Erwan Mathoniere <erwan.mathoniere@grenoble-inp.org> Signed-off-by: Samuel Groot <samuel.groot@grenoble-inp.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-25add DEVELOPER makefile knob to check for acknowledged warningsLibravatar Lars Schneider1-0/+5
We assume Git developers have a reasonably modern compiler and recommend them to enable the DEVELOPER makefile knob to ensure their patches are clear of all compiler warnings the Git core project cares about. Enable the DEVELOPER makefile knob in the Travis-CI build. Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-14Merge branch 'jg/cguide-we-cannot-count'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
* jg/cguide-we-cannot-count: CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count
2015-04-14CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule countLibravatar Julian Gindi1-1/+1
Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more generic 'a few'. Signed-off-by: Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13*config.txt: stick to camelCase naming conventionLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+1
This should improve readability. Compare "thislongname" and "thisLongName". The following keys are left in unchanged. We can decide what to do with them later. - am.keepcr - core.autocrlf .safecrlf .trustctime - diff.dirstat .noprefix - gitcvs.usecrlfattr - gui.blamehistoryctx .trustmtime - pull.twohead - receive.autogc - sendemail.signedoffbycc .smtpsslcertpath .suppresscc Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-02-22Merge branch 'jc/conf-var-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
Longstanding configuration variable naming rules has been added to the documentation. * jc/conf-var-doc: CodingGuidelines: describe naming rules for configuration variables config.txt: mark deprecated variables more prominently config.txt: clarify that add.ignore-errors is deprecated
2015-02-11Merge branch 'ah/usage-strings'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+6
* ah/usage-strings: standardize usage info string format
2015-02-11Merge branch 'jc/coding-guidelines'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+8
* jc/coding-guidelines: CodingGuidelines: clarify C #include rules
2015-02-02CodingGuidelines: describe naming rules for configuration variablesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+23
We may want to say something about command line option names in the new section as well, but for now, let's make sure everybody is clear on how to structure and name their configuration variables. The text for the rules are partly taken from the log message of Jonathan's 6b3020a2 (add: introduce add.ignoreerrors synonym for add.ignore-errors, 2010-12-01). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-15CodingGuidelines: clarify C #include rulesLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+8
Even though "advice.h" includes "git-compat-util.h", it is not sensible to have it as the first #include and indirectly satisify the "You must give git-compat-util.h a clean environment to set up feature test macros before including any of the system headers are included", which is the real requirement. Because: - A command that interacts with the object store, config subsystem, the index, or the working tree cannot do anything without using what is declared in "cache.h"; - A built-in command must be declared in "builtin.h", so anything in builtin/*.c must include it; - These two headers both include "git-compat-util.h" as the first thing; and - Almost all our *.c files (outside compat/ and borrowed files in xdiff/) need some Git-ness from "cache.h" to do something Git-ish. let's explicitly specify that one of these three header files must be the first thing that is included. Any of our *.c file should include the header file that directly declares what it uses, instead of relying on the fact that some *.h file it includes happens to include another *.h file that declares the necessary function or type. Spell it out as another guideline item. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-01-14standardize usage info string formatLibravatar Alex Henrie1-2/+6
This patch puts the usage info strings that were not already in docopt- like format into docopt-like format, which will be a litle easier for end users and a lot easier for translators. Changes include: - Placing angle brackets around fill-in-the-blank parameters - Putting dashes in multiword parameter names - Adding spaces to [-f|--foobar] to make [-f | --foobar] - Replacing <foobar>* with [<foobar>...] Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16Merge branch 'po/error-message-style'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
* po/error-message-style: doc: give some guidelines for error messages
2014-07-10doc: give some guidelines for error messagesLibravatar Philip Oakley1-0/+9
Clarify error message puntuation to reduce review workload. Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-20CodingGuidelines: avoid "test <cond> -a/-o <cond>"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+13
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern shells, the reason to avoid "test <cond> && test <cond>" spawning one extra process by using a single "test <cond> -a <cond>" no longer exists. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-02CodingGuidelines: on splitting a long lineLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+55
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-02CodingGuidelines: on comparisonLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+27
There are arguments for writing a conditional as "a < b" rather than "b > a", or vice versa. Let's give guidance on which we prefer. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/3903/focus=4126 for the original discussion. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-02CodingGuidelines: do not call the conditional statement "if()"Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The point immediately before it is about having SP after the control keyword. Spell it out as 'an "if" statement' instead. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-02CodingGuidelines: give an example for shell function preambleLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+11
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-05-02CodingGuidelines: give an example for control statementsLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>