summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-08-19Merge branch 'jb/commit-graph-doc-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+3
Docfix. * jb/commit-graph-doc-fix: docs: commit-graph: fix some whitespace in the diagram
2020-08-19Merge branch 'jk/blame-coalesce-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-9/+20
When given more than one target line ranges, "git blame -La,b -Lc,d" was over-eager to coalesce groups of original lines and showed incorrect results, which has been corrected. * jk/blame-coalesce-fix: blame: only coalesce lines that are adjacent in result t8003: factor setup out of coalesce test t8003: check output of coalesced blame
2020-08-19Merge branch 'ak/sequencer-fix-find-uniq-abbrev'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+9
Ring buffer with size 4 used for bin-hex translation resulted in a wrong object name in the sequencer's todo output, which has been corrected. * ak/sequencer-fix-find-uniq-abbrev: rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todo
2020-08-19Merge branch 'en/sequencer-merge-labels'Libravatar Junio C Hamano3-12/+12
The commit labels used to explain each side of conflicted hunks placed by the sequencer machinery have been made more readable by humans. * en/sequencer-merge-labels: sequencer: avoid garbled merge machinery messages due to commit labels
2020-08-19Merge branch 'rs/preserve-merges-unused-code-removal'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-10/+0
Code clean-up. * rs/preserve-merges-unused-code-removal: rebase: remove unused function reschedule_last_action
2020-08-19Merge branch 'rs/upload-pack-sigchain-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+0
Code clean-up. * rs/upload-pack-sigchain-fix: upload-pack: remove superfluous sigchain_pop() call
2020-08-19Merge branch 'rp/ita-diff-modefix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
"git diff [<tree-ish>] $path" for a $path that is marked with i-t-a bit was not showing the mode bits from the working tree. * rp/ita-diff-modefix: diff-lib: use worktree mode in diffs from i-t-a entries
2020-08-19Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'Libravatar Junio C Hamano35-48/+71
Updates to "git merge" tests, in preparation for a new merge strategy backend. * en/merge-tests: t6425: be more flexible with rename/delete conflict messages t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renames t6422, t6426: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving renames t6423: add an explanation about why one of the tests does not pass t6416, t6423: clarify some comments and fix some typos t6422: fix multiple errors with the mod6 test expectations t6423: fix test setup for a couple tests t6416, t6422: fix incorrect untracked file count t6422: fix bad check against missing file t6418: tighten delete/normalize conflict testcase Collect merge-related tests to t64xx
2020-08-17Eighth batchLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+36
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-17Merge branch 'so/log-diff-merges-opt'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-2/+171
Earlier, to countermand the implicit "-m" option when the "--first-parent" option is used with "git log", we added the "--[no-]diff-merges" option in the jk/log-fp-implies-m topic. To leave the door open to allow the "--diff-merges" option to take values that instructs how patches for merge commits should be computed (e.g. "cc"? "-p against first parent?"), redefine "--diff-merges" to take non-optional value, and implement "off" that means the same thing as "--no-diff-merges". * so/log-diff-merges-opt: t/t4013: add test for --diff-merges=off doc/git-log: describe --diff-merges=off revision: change "--diff-merges" option to require parameter
2020-08-17Merge branch 'jk/log-fp-implies-m'Libravatar Junio C Hamano9-55/+158
"git log --first-parent -p" showed patches only for single-parent commits on the first-parent chain; the "--first-parent" option has been made to imply "-m". Use "--no-diff-merges" to restore the previous behaviour to omit patches for merge commits. * jk/log-fp-implies-m: doc/git-log: clarify handling of merge commit diffs doc/git-log: move "-t" into diff-options list doc/git-log: drop "-r" diff option doc/git-log: move "Diff Formatting" from rev-list-options log: enable "-m" automatically with "--first-parent" revision: add "--no-diff-merges" option to counteract "-m" log: drop "--cc implies -m" logic
2020-08-17Merge branch 'ma/stop-progress-null-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+10
NULL dereference fix. * ma/stop-progress-null-fix: progress: don't dereference before checking for NULL
2020-08-17Merge branch 'es/test-cmp-typocatcher'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+14
Test framework update. * es/test-cmp-typocatcher: test_cmp: diagnose incorrect arguments
2020-08-17Merge branch 'rp/apply-cached-with-i-t-a'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-4/+77
Recent versions of "git diff-files" shows a diff between the index and the working tree for "intent-to-add" paths as a "new file" patch; "git apply --cached" should be able to take "git diff-files" and should act as an equivalent to "git add" for the path, but the command failed to do so for such a path. * rp/apply-cached-with-i-t-a: t4140: test apply with i-t-a paths apply: make i-t-a entries never match worktree apply: allow "new file" patches on i-t-a entries
2020-08-17Merge branch 'al/bisect-first-parent'Libravatar Junio C Hamano11-103/+195
"git bisect" learns the "--first-parent" option to find the first breakage along the first-parent chain. * al/bisect-first-parent: bisect: combine args passed to find_bisection() bisect: introduce first-parent flag cmd_bisect__helper: defer parsing no-checkout flag rev-list: allow bisect and first-parent flags t6030: modernize "git bisect run" tests
2020-08-17Merge branch 'jk/sideband-error-l10n'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Mark error message for i18n. * jk/sideband-error-l10n: sideband: mark "remote error:" prefix for translation
2020-08-17Merge branch 'jc/noop-with-static-inline'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+15
A no-op replacement function implemented as a C preprocessor macro does not perform as good a job as one implemented as a "static inline" function in catching errors in parameters; replace the former with the latter in <git-compat-util.h> header. * jc/noop-with-static-inline: compat-util: type-check parameters of no-op replacement functions
2020-08-17Merge branch 'pd/mergetool-nvimdiff'Libravatar Junio C Hamano9-18/+51
The existing backends for "git mergetool" based on variants of vim have been refactored and then support for "nvim" has been added. * pd/mergetool-nvimdiff: mergetools: add support for nvimdiff (neovim) family mergetool--lib: improve support for vimdiff-style tool variants
2020-08-17Merge branch 'hn/reftable-prep-part-2'Libravatar Junio C Hamano4-139/+36
Further preliminary change to refs API. * hn/reftable-prep-part-2: Make HEAD a PSEUDOREF rather than PER_WORKTREE. Modify pseudo refs through ref backend storage t1400: use git rev-parse for testing PSEUDOREF existence
2020-08-17Merge branch 'dd/send-email-config'Libravatar Junio C Hamano4-0/+68
Stop when "sendmail.*" configuration variables are defined, which could be a mistaken attempt to define "sendemail.*" variables. * dd/send-email-config: git-send-email: die if sendmail.* config is set
2020-08-17Merge branch 'ps/ref-transaction-hook'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+28
The logic to find the ref transaction hook script attempted to cache the path to the found hook without realizing that it needed to keep a copied value, as the API it used returned a transitory buffer space. This has been corrected. * ps/ref-transaction-hook: t1416: avoid hard-coded sha1 ids refs: fix interleaving hook calls with reference-transaction hook
2020-08-14sequencer: avoid garbled merge machinery messages due to commit labelsLibravatar Elijah Newren3-12/+12
sequencer's get_message() exists to provide good labels on conflict hunks; see commits d68565402a ("revert: clarify label on conflict hunks", 2010-03-20) bf975d379d ("cherry-pick, revert: add a label for ancestor", 2010-03-20) 043a4492b3 ("sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin", 2012-01-11). for background on this function. These labels are of the form <commitID>... <commit summary> or parent of <commitID>... <commit summary> These labels are then passed as branch names to the merge machinery. However, these labels, as formatted, often also serve to confuse. For example, if we have a rename involved in a content merge, then it results in text such as the following: <<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c int j; ======== int counter; >>>>>>>> b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff:bar.c Or in various conflict messages, it can make it very difficult to read: CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left in tree. CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD, suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c. Make a minor change to remove the ellipses and add parentheses around the commit summary; this makes all three examples much easier to read: <<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c int j; ======== int counter; >>>>>>>> b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff):bar.c CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff) and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left in tree. CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff) inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD, suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13Seventh batchLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13Merge branch 'rp/blame-first-parent-doc'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+6
The "git blame --first-parent" option was not documented, but now it is. * rp/blame-first-parent-doc: blame-options.txt: document --first-parent option
2020-08-13Merge branch 'ma/test-quote-cleanup'Libravatar Junio C Hamano18-80/+53
Test cleanup. * ma/test-quote-cleanup: t4104: modernize and simplify quoting t: don't spuriously close and reopen quotes
2020-08-13Merge branch 'jt/has_object'Libravatar Junio C Hamano7-10/+62
A new helper function has_object() has been introduced to make it easier to mark object existence checks that do and don't want to trigger lazy fetches, and a few such checks are converted using it. * jt/has_object: fsck: do not lazy fetch known non-promisor object pack-objects: no fetch when allow-{any,promisor} apply: do not lazy fetch when applying binary sha1-file: introduce no-lazy-fetch has_object()
2020-08-13Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Portability fix. * bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates: git-cvsexportcommit: support Perl before 5.10.1
2020-08-13rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todoLibravatar Antti Keränen2-2/+9
'todo_list_write_to_file' may overwrite the static buffer, originating from 'find_unique_abbrev', that was used to store the short commit hash 'c' for "# Rebase a..b onto c" message in the todo editor. This is because the buffer that is returned from 'find_unique_abbrev' is valid until 4 more calls to `find_unique_abbrev` are made. As 'todo_list_write_to_file' calls 'find_unique_abbrev' for each rebased commit, the hash for 'c' is overwritten if there are 4 or more commits in the rebase. This behavior has been broken since its introduction. Fix by storing the short onto commit hash in a different buffer that remains valid, before calling 'todo_list_write_to_file'. Found-by: Jussi Keränen <jussike@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Antti Keränen <detegr@rbx.email> Acked-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13docs: commit-graph: fix some whitespace in the diagramLibravatar Johannes Berg1-3/+3
In the merge diagram, some whitespace is missing which makes it a bit confusing, fix that. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13blame: only coalesce lines that are adjacent in resultLibravatar Jeff King2-0/+10
After blame has finished but before we produce any output, we coalesce groups of lines that were adjacent in the original suspect (which may have been split apart by lines in intermediate commits which went away). However, this can cause incorrect output if the lines are not also adjacent in the result. For instance, the case in t8003 has: ABC DEF which becomes ABC SPLIT DEF Blaming only lines 1 and 3 in the result yields two blame groups (one for each line) that were adjacent in the original. That's enough for us to coalesce them into a single group, but that loses information: our output routines assume they're adjacent in the result as well, and we output: <oid> 1) ABC <oid> 2) SPLIT This is nonsense for two reasons: - we were asked about line 3, not line 2; we should not output the SPLIT line at all - commit <oid> did not touch the SPLIT line at all! We found the correct blame for line 3, but the bug is actually in the output stage, which is showing the wrong line number and content from the final file. We can fix this by only coalescing when both the suspect and result lines are adjacent. That fixes this bug, but keeps coalescing in cases where want it (e.g., the existing test in t8003 where SPLIT goes away, and the lines really are adjacent in the result). Reported-by: Nuthan Munaiah <nm6061@rit.edu> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13t8003: factor setup out of coalesce testLibravatar Jeff King1-6/+10
In preparation for adding more tests of blame's coalesce code, let's split the setup out from the first test, and give each of the commits a more meaningful name: - $orig for the original source that added the lines - $split for the version where they are split apart - $final for the final version that re-joins them That's not strictly necessary, but makes the follow-on tests less brittle than relying on HEAD^, etc, to name the commits. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13t8003: check output of coalesced blameLibravatar Jeff King1-7/+4
Commit f0cbe742f4 (blame: add a test to cover blame_coalesce(), 2019-06-20) added a test case where blame can usefully coalesce two groups of lines. But since it relies on the normal blame output, it only exercises the code and can't tell whether the lines were actually joined into a single group. However, by using --porcelain output, we can see how git-blame considers the groupings (and likewise how the coalescing might have a real user-visible impact for a tool that uses the porcelain-output groupings). This lets us confirm that we are indeed coalescing correctly (and the fact that this test case requires coalescing can be verified by dropping the call to blame_coalesce(), causing the test to fail). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-12rebase: remove unused function reschedule_last_actionLibravatar René Scharfe1-10/+0
The only caller of reschedule_last_action was removed by ef64bb328df (rebase: strip unused code in git-rebase--preserve-merges.sh, 2018-05-28); remove this unused shell function as well. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11Sixth batchLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+11
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11Merge branch 'ss/cmake-build'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-15/+1024
CMake support to build with MSVC for Windows bypassing the Makefile. * ss/cmake-build: ci: modification of main.yml to use cmake for vs-build job cmake: support for building git on windows with msvc and clang. cmake: support for building git on windows with mingw cmake: support for testing git when building out of the source tree cmake: support for testing git with ctest cmake: installation support for git cmake: generate the shell/perl/python scripts and templates, translations Introduce CMake support for configuring Git
2020-08-11Merge branch 'tb/upload-pack-filters'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-0/+184
The component to respond to "git fetch" request is made more configurable to selectively allow or reject object filtering specification used for partial cloning. * tb/upload-pack-filters: t5616: use test_i18ngrep for upload-pack errors upload-pack.c: introduce 'uploadpackfilter.tree.maxDepth' upload-pack.c: allow banning certain object filter(s) list_objects_filter_options: introduce 'list_object_filter_config_name'
2020-08-11Merge branch 'es/worktree-doc-cleanups'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-61/+62
Doc cleanup around "worktree". * es/worktree-doc-cleanups: git-worktree.txt: link to man pages when citing other Git commands git-worktree.txt: make start of new sentence more obvious git-worktree.txt: fix minor grammatical issues git-worktree.txt: consistently use term "working tree" git-worktree.txt: employ fixed-width typeface consistently
2020-08-11Merge branch 'bc/sha-256-part-3'Libravatar Junio C Hamano74-351/+633
The final leg of SHA-256 transition. * bc/sha-256-part-3: (39 commits) t: remove test_oid_init in tests docs: add documentation for extensions.objectFormat ci: run tests with SHA-256 t: make SHA1 prerequisite depend on default hash t: allow testing different hash algorithms via environment t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithm repository: enable SHA-256 support by default setup: add support for reading extensions.objectformat bundle: add new version for use with SHA-256 builtin/verify-pack: implement an --object-format option http-fetch: set up git directory before parsing pack hashes t0410: mark test with SHA1 prerequisite t5308: make test work with SHA-256 t9700: make hash size independent t9500: ensure that algorithm info is preserved in config t9350: make hash size independent t9301: make hash size independent t9300: use $ZERO_OID instead of hard-coded object ID t9300: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t8011: make hash size independent ...
2020-08-11t/t4013: add test for --diff-merges=offLibravatar Sergey Organov3-0/+158
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11doc/git-log: describe --diff-merges=offLibravatar Sergey Organov1-1/+5
Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11revision: change "--diff-merges" option to require parameterLibravatar Sergey Organov1-1/+8
--diff-merges=off is the only accepted form for now, a synonym for --no-diff-merges. This patch is a preparation for adding more values, as well as supporting --diff-merges=<parent>, where <parent> is single parent number to output diff against. Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11t1416: avoid hard-coded sha1 idsLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+3
The test added by e5256c82e5 (refs: fix interleaving hook calls with reference-transaction hook, 2020-08-07) uses hard-coded sha1 object ids in its expected output. This causes it to fail when run with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256. Let's make use of the oid variables we define earlier, as the rest of the nearby tests do. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-11upload-pack: remove superfluous sigchain_pop() callLibravatar René Scharfe1-1/+0
2997178ee6 (upload-pack: split check_unreachable() in two, prep for get_reachable_list(), 2016-06-12) moved most code of has_unreachable() into the new function do_reachable_revlist(). The latter takes care to ignore SIGPIPE during its operations, and restores the original signal handler before returning. However, a sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE) call remained in the error handling code of has_unreachable(), which does nothing because the stack is empty after do_reachable_revlist() cleaned up after itself. Remove it. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6425: be more flexible with rename/delete conflict messagesLibravatar Elijah Newren1-1/+2
t6425 was very picky about the exact output message produced by a rename/delete conflict, in a way that just scratches the surface of the mess that was built into merge-recursive. The idea was that it would try to find the possible combinations of different conflict types, and when more than one was present for one path, it would try to provide a combined message that covered all the cases. There's a lot to unravel here... First, there's a basic conflict type known as modify/delete, which is a content conflict. It occurs when one side deletes a file, but the other modifies it. There is also a path conflict known as a rename/delete. This occurs when one side deletes a path, and the other renames it. This is not a content conflict, it is a path conflict. It will often occur in combination with a content conflict, though, namely a modify/delete. As such, these two were often combined. Another type of conflict that can exist is a directory/file conflict. For example, one side adds a new file at some path, and the other side of history adds a directory at the same path. The path that was "added" could have been put there by a rename, though. Thus, we have the possibility of a single path being affected by a modify/delete, a rename/delete, and a directory/file conflict. In part, this was a natural by-product of merge-recursive's design. Since it was doing a four way merge with the contents of the working tree being the fourth factor it had to consider, it had working tree handling spread all over the code. It also had directory/file conflict handling spread everywhere through all the other types of conflicts. And our testsuite has a huge number of directory/file conflict tests because trying to get them right required modifying so many different codepaths. A natural outgrowth of this kind of structure is conflict messages that combine all the different types that the current codepath is considering. However, if we want to make the different conflict types orthogonal and avoid repeating ourselves and getting very brittle code, then we need to split the messages from these different conflict types apart. Besides, trying to determine all possible permutations is a _royal_ mess. The code to handle the rename/delete/directory/file conflict output is already somewhat hard to parse, and is somewhat brittle. But if we really wanted to go that route, then we'd have to have special handling for the following types of combinations: * rename/add/delete: on side of history that didn't rename the given file, remove the file instead and place an unrelated file in the way of the rename * rename/rename(2to1)/mode conflict/delete/delete: two different files, one executable and the other not, are renamed to the same location, each side deletes the source file that the other side renames * rename/rename(1to2)/add/add: file renamed differently on each side of history, with each side placing an unrelated file in the way of the other * rename/rename(1to2)/content conflict/file location/(D/F)/(D/F)/: both sides modify a file in conflicting way, both rename that file but to different paths, one side renames the directory which the other side had renamed that file into causing it to possibly need a transitive rename, and each side puts a directory in the way of the other's path. Let's back away from this path of insanity, and allow the different types of conflicts to be handled by separate pieces of non-repeated code by allowing the conflict messages to be split into their separate types. (If multiple conflict types affect a single path, the conflict messages can be printed sequentially.) Start this path with a simple change: modify this test to be more flexible and accept the output either merge backend (recursive or the new ort) will produce. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren2-8/+14
Much like the last commit accepted 'add/add' and 'rename/add' interchangably, we also want to do the same for 'add/add' and 'rename/rename'. This also allows us to avoid the ambiguity in meaning with 'rename/rename' (is it two separate files renamed to the same location, or one file renamed on both sides but differently)? Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6422, t6426: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving renamesLibravatar Elijah Newren2-9/+14
merge-recursive treats an add/add conflict where one of the adds came from a rename as a separate 'rename/add' type of conflict. However, if there is not content conflict after the content merge(s), then the file is not considered to be conflicted. That suggests the conflict type is really just add/add. Other merge engines might choose to print messages to the console that just refer to these as add/add conflicts; accept both types of output. Note: it could help to notify users if the three-way content merge of the rename had content conflicts, because when we then go to two-way merge THAT with the conflicting add we can get nested conflict markers. merge-recursive, unfortunately, doesn't do that, but other merge engines could. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6423: add an explanation about why one of the tests does not passLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+8
I had long since forgotten the idea behind this test and why it failed, and took a little while to figure it out. To prevent others from having to spend a similar time on it, add an explanation in the comments. However, the reasoning in the explanation makes me question why I considered it a failure at all. I'm not sure if I had a better reason when I originally wrote it, but for now just add commentary about the possible expectations and why it behaves the way it does right now. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6416, t6423: clarify some comments and fix some typosLibravatar Elijah Newren2-14/+13
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6422: fix multiple errors with the mod6 test expectationsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-9/+10
This test had multiple issues causing it to fail for the wrong reason(s): * rename/rename(1to2) conflicts have always left the original source path present in the working directory and index (at stage 1). Thus, the triple rename/rename(1to2) should result in 9 unstaged files, not 6. * It messed up the three-way content merge for checking the results of merging for one of the renames, accidentally turning it into a two-way merge. * It got the contents of the base files it was using to compare against wrong, due to an off-by-one error, and overwrite-redirection ('>') instead of append-redirection ('>>'). * It used slightly too-long conflict markers * It didn't include filenames in the conflict marker hunks (granted, that was a shortcoming of the merge-recursive backend for rename/add and rename/rename(2to1) conflicts, but since it's test_expect_failure anyway we might as well make it expect our preferred behavior rather than some compromise that we can't yet reach anyway). Fix these issues so that a merge backend which correctly handles these kinds of nested conflicts will pass the test. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-10t6423: fix test setup for a couple testsLibravatar Elijah Newren1-0/+2
Commit da1e295e00 ("t604[236]: do not run setup in separate tests", 2019-10-22) removed approximately half the tests (which were setup-only tests) in t6043 by turning them into functions that the subsequent test would call as their first step. This ensured that any test from this file could be run entirely independently of all the other tests in the file. Unfortunately, the call to the new setup function was missed in two of the test_expect_failure cases. Add them in. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>