summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-02-13Merge branch 'bw/inet-pton-ntop-compat' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-12/+0
* bw/inet-pton-ntop-compat: Drop system includes from inet_pton/inet_ntop compatibility wrappers
2012-02-13Merge branch 'mp/make-cleanse-x-for-exe' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+3
* mp/make-cleanse-x-for-exe: Explicitly set X to avoid potential build breakage
2012-02-13Merge branch 'jn/merge-no-edit-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-3/+19
* jn/merge-no-edit-fix: merge: do not launch an editor on "--no-edit $tag"
2012-02-13Update draft release notes to 1.7.9.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+19
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Merge branch 'js/add-e-submodule-fix' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* js/add-e-submodule-fix: add -e: do not show difference in a submodule that is merely dirty
2012-02-13Merge branch 'jc/parse-date-raw' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano4-1/+60
* jc/parse-date-raw: parse_date(): '@' prefix forces git-timestamp parse_date(): allow ancient git-timestamp
2012-02-13Merge branch 'jc/merge-ff-only-stronger-than-signed-merge' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+15
* jc/merge-ff-only-stronger-than-signed-merge: merge: do not create a signed tag merge under --ff-only option
2012-02-13Merge branch 'jc/branch-desc-typoavoidance' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano3-4/+61
* jc/branch-desc-typoavoidance: branch --edit-description: protect against mistyped branch name tests: add write_script helper function
2012-02-13Merge branch 'jn/rpm-spec' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+1
* jn/rpm-spec: git.spec: Workaround localized messages not put in any RPM
2012-02-13t: use sane_unset instead of unsetLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason6-10/+10
Change several tests to use the sane_unset function introduced in v1.7.3.1-35-g00648ba instead of the built-in unset function. This fixes a failure I was having on t9130-git-svn-authors-file.sh on Solaris, and prevents several other issues from occurring. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Remove Git's support for smoke testingLibravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason3-133/+1
I'm no longer running the Git smoke testing service at smoke.git.nix.is due to Smolder being a fragile piece of software not having time to follow through on making it easy for third parties to run and submit their own smoke tests. So remove the support in Git for sending smoke tests to smoke.git.nix.is, it's still easy to modify the test suite to submit smokes somewhere else. This reverts the following commits: Revert "t/README: Add SMOKE_{COMMENT,TAGS}= to smoke_report target" -- e38efac87d Revert "t/README: Document the Smoke testing" -- d15e9ebc5c Revert "t/Makefile: Create test-results dir for smoke target" -- 617344d77b Revert "tests: Infrastructure for Git smoke testing" -- b6b84d1b74 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13Makefile: Change the default compiler from "gcc" to "cc"Libravatar Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason1-1/+1
Ever since the very first commit to git.git we've been setting CC to "gcc". Presumably this is behavior that Linus copied from the Linux Makefile. However unlike Linux Git is written in ANSI C and supports a multitude of compilers, including Clang, Sun Studio, xlc etc. On my Linux box "cc" is a symlink to clang, and on a Solaris box I have access to "cc" is Sun Studio's CC. Both of these are perfectly capable of compiling Git, and it's annoying to have to specify CC=cc on the command-line when compiling Git when that's the default behavior of most other portable programs. So change the default to "cc". Users who want to compile with GCC can still add "CC=gcc" to the make(1) command-line, but those users who don't have GCC as their "cc" will see expected behavior, and as a bonus we'll be more likely to smoke out new compilation warnings from our distributors since they'll me using a more varied set of compilers by default. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-10Update draft release notes to 1.7.9.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+17
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-10Merge branch 'jc/maint-request-pull-for-tag' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano3-8/+4
* jc/maint-request-pull-for-tag: request-pull: explicitly ask tags/$name to be pulled
2012-02-10Merge branch 'tr/grep-l-with-decoration' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+25
* tr/grep-l-with-decoration: grep: fix -l/-L interaction with decoration lines
2012-02-10Merge branch 'jl/submodule-re-add' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-0/+9
* jl/submodule-re-add: submodule add: fix breakage when re-adding a deep submodule
2012-02-10Merge branch 'da/maint-mergetool-twoway' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-5/+35
* da/maint-mergetool-twoway: mergetool: Provide an empty file when needed
2012-02-09Explicitly set X to avoid potential build breakageLibravatar Michael Palimaka1-0/+3
$X is appended to binary names for Windows builds (ie. git.exe). Pollution from the environment can inadvertently trigger this behaviour, resulting in 'git' turning into 'gitwhatever' without warning. Signed-off-by: Michael Palimaka <kensington@astralcloak.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-09merge: do not launch an editor on "--no-edit $tag"Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-3/+19
When the user explicitly asked us not to, don't launch an editor. But do everything else the same way as the "edit" case, i.e. leave the comment with verification result in the log template and record the mergesig in the resulting merge commit for later inspection. Based on initiail analysis by Jonathan Nieder. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-07add -e: do not show difference in a submodule that is merely dirtyLibravatar Johannes Schindelin1-0/+1
When the HEAD of the submodule matches what is recorded in the index of the superproject, and it has local changes or untracked files, the patch offered by "git add -e" for editing shows a diff like this: diff --git a/submodule b/submodule <header> -deadbeef... +deadbeef...-dirty Because applying such a patch has no effect to the index, this is a useless noise. Generate the patch with IGNORE_DIRTY_SUBMODULES flag to prevent such a change from getting reported. This patch also loses the "-dirty" suffix from the output when the HEAD of the submodule is different from what is in the index of the superproject. As such dirtiness expressed by the suffix does not affect the result of the patch application at all, there is no information lost if we remove it. The user could still run "git status" before "git add -e" if s/he cares about the dirtiness. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-06Prepare for 1.7.9.1Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+20
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-06completion: --edit and --no-edit for git-mergeLibravatar Adrian Weimann1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Adrian Weimann <adrian.weimann@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05Merge branch 'sp/smart-http-failure-to-push' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-4/+33
* sp/smart-http-failure-to-push: remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches fail
2012-02-05Merge branch 'jc/maint-log-first-parent-pathspec' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+10
* jc/maint-log-first-parent-pathspec: Making pathspec limited log play nicer with --first-parent
2012-02-05Merge branch 'cb/push-quiet' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano8-19/+78
* cb/push-quiet: t5541: avoid TAP test miscounting fix push --quiet: add 'quiet' capability to receive-pack server_supports(): parse feature list more carefully
2012-02-05Merge branch 'cb/maint-kill-subprocess-upon-signal' into maintLibravatar Junio C Hamano3-1/+72
* cb/maint-kill-subprocess-upon-signal: dashed externals: kill children on exit run-command: optionally kill children on exit
2012-02-05Sync with 1.7.6.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-24/+2
* maint-1.7.8: Git 1.7.6.6 imap-send: remove dead code
2012-02-05Sync with 1.7.6.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-24/+2
* maint-1.7.7: Git 1.7.6.6 imap-send: remove dead code
2012-02-05Sync with 1.7.6.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-24/+2
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05Git 1.7.6.6Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05imap-send: remove dead codeLibravatar Jeff King1-23/+0
The imap-send code was adapted from another project, and still contains many unused bits of code. One of these bits contains a type "struct string_list" which bears no resemblence to the "struct string_list" we use elsewhere in git. This causes the compiler to complain if git's string_list ever becomes part of cache.h. Let's just drop the dead code. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05branch --edit-description: protect against mistyped branch nameLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-4/+52
It is very easy to mistype the branch name when editing its description, e.g. $ git checkout -b my-topic master : work work work : now we are at a good point to switch working something else $ git checkout master : ah, let's write it down before we forget what we were doing $ git branch --edit-description my-tpoic The command does not notice that branch 'my-tpoic' does not exist. It is not lost (it becomes description of an unborn my-tpoic branch), but is not very useful. So detect such a case and error out to reduce the grief factor from this common mistake. This incidentally also errors out --edit-description when the HEAD points at an unborn branch (immediately after "init", or "checkout --orphan"), because at that point, you do not even have any commit that is part of your history and there is no point in describing how this particular branch is different from the branch it forked off of, which is the useful bit of information the branch description is designed to capture. We may want to special case the unborn case later, but that is outside the scope of this patch to prevent more common mistakes before 1.7.9 series gains too much widespread use. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05Drop system includes from inet_pton/inet_ntop compatibility wrappersLibravatar Ben Walton2-12/+0
As both of these compatibility wrappers include git-compat-utils.h, all of the system includes were redundant. Dropping these system includes also makes git-compat-utils.h the first include which avoids a compiler warning on Solaris due to the redefinition of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. Signed-off-by: Ben Walton <bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-05merge: do not create a signed tag merge under --ff-only optionLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+15
Starting at release v1.7.9, if you ask to merge a signed tag, "git merge" always creates a merge commit, even when the tag points at a commit that happens to be a descendant of your current commit. Unfortunately, this interacts rather badly for people who use --ff-only to make sure that their branch is free of local developments. It used to be possible to say: $ git checkout -b frotz v1.7.9~30 $ git merge --ff-only v1.7.9 and expect that the resulting tip of frotz branch matches v1.7.9^0 (aka the commit tagged as v1.7.9), but this fails with the updated Git with: fatal: Not possible to fast-forward, aborting. because a merge that merges v1.7.9 tag to v1.7.9~30 cannot be created by fast forwarding. We could teach users that now they have to do $ git merge --ff-only v1.7.9^0 but it is far more pleasant for users if we DWIMmed this ourselves. When an integrator pulls in a topic from a lieutenant via a signed tag, even when the work done by the lieutenant happens to fast-forward, the integrator wants to have a merge record, so the integrator will not be asking for --ff-only when running "git pull" in such a case. Therefore, this change should not regress the support for the use case v1.7.9 wanted to add. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-03parse_date(): '@' prefix forces git-timestampLibravatar Junio C Hamano4-2/+32
The only place that the issue this series addresses was observed where we read "cat-file commit" output and put it in GIT_AUTHOR_DATE in order to replay a commit with an ancient timestamp. With the previous patch alone, "git commit --date='20100917 +0900'" can be misinterpreted to mean an ancient timestamp, not September in year 2010. Guard this codepath by requring an extra '@' in front of the raw git timestamp on the parsing side. This of course needs to be compensated by updating get_author_ident_from_commit and the code for "git commit --amend" to prepend '@' to the string read from the existing commit in the GIT_AUTHOR_DATE environment variable. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-03parse_date(): allow ancient git-timestampLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+29
The date-time parser parses out a human-readble datestring piece by piece, so that it could even parse a string in a rather strange notation like 'noon november 11, 2005', but restricts itself from parsing strings in "<seconds since epoch> <timezone>" format only for reasonably new timestamps (like 1974 or newer) with 10 or more digits. This is to prevent a string like "20100917" from getting interpreted as seconds since epoch (we want to treat it as September 17, 2010 instead) while doing so. The same codepath is used to read back the timestamp that we have already recorded in the headers of commit and tag objects; because of this, such a commit with timestamp "0 +0000" cannot be rebased or amended very easily. Teach parse_date() codepath to special case a string of the form "<digits> +<4-digits>" to work this issue around, but require that there is no other cruft around the string when parsing a timestamp of this format for safety. Note that this has a slight backward incompatibility implications. If somebody writes "git commit --date='20100917 +0900'" and wants it to mean a timestamp in September 2010 in Japan, this change will break such a use case. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-03git.spec: Workaround localized messages not put in any RPMLibravatar Jakub Narebski1-0/+1
Currently building git RPM from tarball results in the following error: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/git.mo This is caused by the fact that localized messages do not have their place in some RPM package. Let's postpone decision where they should be put (be it git-i18n-Icelandic, or git-i18n, or git package itself) for later by removing locale files at the end of install phase. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-03tests: add write_script helper functionLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+9
Many of the scripts in the test suite write small helper shell scripts to disk. It's best if these shell scripts start with "#!$SHELL_PATH" rather than "#!/bin/sh", because /bin/sh on some platforms is too buggy to be used. However, it can be cumbersome to expand $SHELL_PATH, because the usual recipe for writing a script is: cat >foo.sh <<-\EOF #!/bin/sh echo my arguments are "$@" EOF To expand $SHELL_PATH, you have to either interpolate the here-doc (which would require quoting "\$@"), or split the creation into two commands (interpolating the $SHELL_PATH line, but not the rest of the script). Let's provide a helper function that makes that less syntactically painful. While we're at it, this helper can also take care of the "chmod +x" that typically comes after the creation of such a script, saving the caller a line. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-31request-pull: explicitly ask tags/$name to be pulledLibravatar Junio C Hamano3-8/+4
When asking for a tag to be pulled, disambiguate by leaving tags/ prefix in front of the name of the tag. E.g. ... in the git repository at: git://example.com/git/git.git/ tags/v1.2.3 for you to fetch changes up to 123456... This way, older versions of "git pull" can be used to respond to such a request more easily, as "git pull $URL v1.2.3" did not DWIM to fetch v1.2.3 tag in older versions. Also this makes it clearer for humans that the pull request is made for a tag and he should anticipate a signed one. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-27Git 1.7.9Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+6
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-26INSTALL: warn about recent Fedora breakageLibravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+5
Recent releases of Redhat/Fedora are reported to ship Perl binary package with some core modules stripped away (see http://lwn.net/Articles/477234/) against the upstream Perl5 people's wishes. The Time::HiRes module used by gitweb one of them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-26git-completion: workaround zsh COMPREPLY bugLibravatar Felipe Contreras1-0/+8
zsh adds a backslash (foo\ ) for each item in the COMPREPLY array if IFS doesn't contain spaces. This issue has been reported[1], but there is no solution yet. This wasn't a problem due to another bug[2], which was fixed in zsh version 4.3.12. After this change, 'git checkout ma<tab>' would resolve to 'git checkout master\ '. Aditionally, the introduction of __gitcomp_nl in commit a31e626 (completion: optimize refs completion) in git also made the problem apparent, as Matthieu Moy reported. The simplest and most generic solution is to hide all the changes we do to IFS, so that "foo \nbar " is recognized by zsh as "foo bar". This works on versions of git before and after the introduction of __gitcomp_nl (a31e626), and versions of zsh before and after 4.3.12. Once zsh is fixed, we should conditionally disable this workaround to have the same benefits as bash users. [1] http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2012/msg00053.html [2] http://zsh.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=zsh/zsh;a=commitdiff;h=2e25dfb8fd38dbef0a306282ffab1d343ce3ad8d Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-26docs: minor grammar fixes for v1.7.9 release notesLibravatar Jeff King1-6/+7
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-24submodule add: fix breakage when re-adding a deep submoduleLibravatar Jens Lehmann2-0/+9
Since recently a submodule with name <name> has its git directory in the .git/modules/<name> directory of the superproject while the work tree contains a gitfile pointing there. When the same submodule is added on a branch where it wasn't present so far (it is not found in the .gitmodules file), the name is not initialized from the path as it should. This leads to a wrong path entered in the gitfile when the .git/modules/<name> directory is found, as this happily uses the - now empty - name. It then always points only a single directory up, even if we have a path deeper in the directory hierarchy. Fix that by initializing the name of the submodule early in module_clone() if module_name() returned an empty name and add a test to catch that bug. Reported-by: Jehan Bing <jehan@orb.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-23mergetool: Provide an empty file when neededLibravatar David Aguilar2-5/+35
Some merge tools cannot cope when $LOCAL, $BASE, or $REMOTE are missing. $BASE can be missing when two branches independently add the same filename. Provide an empty file to make these tools happy. When a delete/modify conflict occurs, $LOCAL and $REMOTE can also be missing. We have special case code to handle such case so this change may not affect that codepath, but try to be consistent and create an empty file for them anyway. Reported-by: Jason Wenger <jcwenger@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-23grep: fix -l/-L interaction with decoration linesLibravatar Albert Yale2-2/+25
In threaded mode, git-grep emits file breaks (enabled with context, -W and --break) into the accumulation buffers even if they are not required. The output collection thread then uses skip_first_line to skip the first such line in the output, which would otherwise be at the very top. This is wrong when the user also specified -l/-L/-c, in which case every line is relevant. While arguably giving these options together doesn't make any sense, git-grep has always quietly accepted it. So do not skip anything in these cases. Signed-off-by: Albert Yale <surfingalbert@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-23Fix typo in 1.7.9 release notesLibravatar Michael Haggerty1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-20remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches failLibravatar Shawn O. Pearce2-4/+33
The protocol between transport-helper.c and remote-curl requires remote-curl to always print a blank line after the push command has run. If the blank line is ommitted, transport-helper kills its container process (the git push the user started) with exit(128) and no message indicating a problem, assuming the helper already printed reasonable error text to the console. However if the remote rejects all branches with "ng" commands in the report-status reply, send-pack terminates with non-zero status, and in turn remote-curl exited with non-zero status before outputting the blank line after the helper status printed by send-pack. No error messages reach the user. This caused users to see the following from git push over HTTP when the remote side's update hook rejected the branch: $ git push http://... master Counting objects: 4, done. Delta compression using up to 6 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (2/2), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 301 bytes, done. Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) $ Always print a blank line after the send-pack process terminates, ensuring the helper status report (if it was output) will be correctly parsed by the calling transport-helper.c. This ensures the helper doesn't abort before the status report can be shown to the user. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-19Making pathspec limited log play nicer with --first-parentLibravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+10
In a topic branch workflow, you often want to find the latest commit that merged a side branch that touched a particular area of the system, so that a new topic branch to work on that area can be forked from that commit. For example, I wanted to find an appropriate fork-point to queue Luke's changes related to git-p4 in contrib/fast-import/. "git log --first-parent" traverses the first-parent chain, and "-m --stat" shows the list of paths touched by commits including merge commits. We could ask the question this way: # What is the latest commit that touched that path? $ git log --first-parent --oneline -m --stat master | sed -e '/^ contrib\/fast-import\/git-p4 /q' | tail The above finds that 8cbfc11 (Merge branch 'pw/p4-view-updates', 2012-01-06) was such a commit. But a more natural way to spell this question is this: $ git log --first-parent --oneline -m --stat -1 master -- \ contrib/fast-import/git-p4 Unfortunately, this does not work. It finds ecb7cf9 (git-p4: rewrite view handling, 2012-01-02). This commit is a part of the merged topic branch and is _not_ on the first-parent path from the 'master': $ git show-branch 8cbfc11 ecb7cf9 ! [8cbfc11] Merge branch 'pw/p4-view-updates' ! [ecb7cf9] git-p4: rewrite view handling -- - [8cbfc11] Merge branch 'pw/p4-view-updates' + [8cbfc11^2] git-p4: view spec documentation ++ [ecb7cf9] git-p4: rewrite view handling The problem is caused by the merge simplification logic when it inspects the merge commit 8cbfc11. In this case, the history leading to the tip of 'master' did not touch git-p4 since 'pw/p4-view-updates' topic forked, and the result of the merge is simply a copy from the tip of the topic branch in the view limited by the given pathspec. The merge simplification logic discards the history on the mainline side of the merge, and pretends as if the sole parent of the merge is its second parent, i.e. the tip of the topic. While this simplification is correct in the general case, it is at least surprising if not outright wrong when the user explicitly asked to show the first-parent history. Here is an attempt to fix this issue, by not allowing us to compare the merge result with anything but the first parent when --first-parent is in effect, to avoid the history traversal veering off to the side branch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-01-18Git 1.7.9-rc2Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-10/+2
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>