summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2015-05-22for-each-ref: use skip_prefix instead of starts_withLibravatar Jeff King1-2/+4
This saves us having to maintain a magic number to skip past the matched prefix. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22sha1_name: implement @{push} shorthandLibravatar Jeff King3-1/+101
In a triangular workflow, each branch may have two distinct points of interest: the @{upstream} that you normally pull from, and the destination that you normally push to. There isn't a shorthand for the latter, but it's useful to have. For instance, you may want to know which commits you haven't pushed yet: git log @{push}.. Or as a more complicated example, imagine that you normally pull changes from origin/master (which you set as your @{upstream}), and push changes to your own personal fork (e.g., as myfork/topic). You may push to your fork from multiple machines, requiring you to integrate the changes from the push destination, rather than upstream. With this patch, you can just do: git rebase @{push} rather than typing out the full name. The heavy lifting is all done by branch_get_push; here we just wire it up to the "@{push}" syntax. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22sha1_name: refactor interpret_upstream_markLibravatar Jeff King1-21/+23
Now that most of the logic for our local get_upstream_branch has been pushed into the generic branch_get_upstream, we can fold the remainder into interpret_upstream_mark. Furthermore, what remains is generic to any branch-related "@{foo}" we might add in the future, and there's enough boilerplate that we'd like to reuse it. Let's parameterize the two operations (parsing the mark and computing its value) so that we can reuse this for "@{push}" in the near future. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22sha1_name: refactor upstream_markLibravatar Jeff King1-3/+9
We will be adding new mark types in the future, so separate the suffix data from the logic. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22remote.c: add branch_get_pushLibravatar Jeff King2-0/+95
In a triangular workflow, the place you pull from and the place you push to may be different. As we have branch_get_upstream for the former, this patch adds branch_get_push for the latter (and as the former implements @{upstream}, so will this implement @{push} in a future patch). Note that the memory-handling for the return value bears some explanation. Some code paths require allocating a new string, and some let us return an existing string. We should provide a consistent interface to the caller, so it knows whether to free the result or not. We could do so by xstrdup-ing any existing strings, and having the caller always free. But that makes us inconsistent with branch_get_upstream, so we would prefer to simply take ownership of the resulting string. We do so by storing it inside the "struct branch", just as we do with the upstream refname (in that case we compute it when the branch is created, but there's no reason not to just fill it in lazily in this case). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22remote.c: return upstream name from stat_tracking_infoLibravatar Jeff King5-44/+32
After calling stat_tracking_info, callers often want to print the name of the upstream branch (in addition to the tracking count). To do this, they have to access branch->merge->dst[0] themselves. This is not wrong, as the return value from stat_tracking_info tells us whether we have an upstream branch or not. But it is a bit leaky, as we make an assumption about how it calculated the upstream name. Instead, let's add an out-parameter that lets the caller know the upstream name we found. As a bonus, we can get rid of the unusual tri-state return from the function. We no longer need to use it to differentiate between "no tracking config" and "tracking ref does not exist" (since you can check the upstream_name for that), so we can just use the usual 0/-1 convention for success/error. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-22remote.c: untangle error logic in branch_get_upstreamLibravatar Jeff King1-6/+13
The error-diagnosis logic in branch_get_upstream was copied straight from sha1_name.c in the previous commit. However, because we check all error cases and upfront and then later diagnose them, the logic is a bit tangled. In particular: - if branch->merge[0] is NULL, we may end up dereferencing it for an error message (in practice, it should never be NULL, so this is probably not a triggerable bug). - We may enter the code path because branch->merge[0]->dst is NULL, but we then start our error diagnosis by checking whether our local branch exists. But that is only relevant to diagnosing missing merge config, not a missing tracking ref; our diagnosis may hide the real problem. Instead, let's just use a sequence of "if" blocks to check for each error type, diagnose it, and return NULL. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: report specific errors from branch_get_upstreamLibravatar Jeff King7-30/+48
When the previous commit introduced the branch_get_upstream helper, there was one call-site that could not be converted: the one in sha1_name.c, which gives detailed error messages for each possible failure. Let's teach the helper to optionally report these specific errors. This lets us convert another callsite, and means we can use the helper in other locations that want to give the same error messages. The logic and error messages come straight from sha1_name.c, with the exception that we start each error with a lowercase letter, as is our usual style (note that a few tests need updated as a result). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: introduce branch_get_upstream helperLibravatar Jeff King5-16/+23
All of the information needed to find the @{upstream} of a branch is included in the branch struct, but callers have to navigate a series of possible-NULL values to get there. Let's wrap that logic up in an easy-to-read helper. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: hoist read_config into remote_get_1Libravatar Jeff King1-2/+2
Before the previous commit, we had to make sure that read_config() was called before entering remote_get_1, because we needed to pass pushremote_name by value. But now that we pass a function, we can let remote_get_1 handle loading the config itself, turning our wrappers into true one-liners. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: provide per-branch pushremote nameLibravatar Jeff King2-18/+24
When remote.c loads its config, it records the branch.*.pushremote for the current branch along with the global remote.pushDefault value, and then binds them into a single value: the default push for the current branch. We then pass this value (which may be NULL) to remote_get_1 when looking up a remote for push. This has a few downsides: 1. It's confusing. The early-binding of the "current value" led to bugs like the one fixed by 98b406f (remote: handle pushremote config in any order, 2014-02-24). And the fact that pushremotes fall back to ordinary remotes is not explicit at all; it happens because remote_get_1 cannot tell the difference between "we are not asking for the push remote" and "there is no push remote configured". 2. It throws away intermediate data. After read_config() finishes, we have no idea what the value of remote.pushDefault was, because the string has been overwritten by the current branch's branch.*.pushremote. 3. It doesn't record other data. We don't note the branch.*.pushremote value for anything but the current branch. Let's make this more like the fetch-remote config. We'll record the pushremote for each branch, and then explicitly compute the correct remote for the current branch at the time of reading. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: hoist branch.*.remote lookup out of remote_get_1Libravatar Jeff King2-7/+15
We'll want to use this logic as a fallback when looking up the pushremote, so let's pull it out into its own function. We don't technically need to make this available outside of remote.c, but doing so will provide a consistent API with pushremote_for_branch, which we will add later. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: drop "remote" pointer from "struct branch"Libravatar Jeff King4-9/+5
When we create each branch struct, we fill in the "remote_name" field from the config, and then fill in the actual "remote" field (with a "struct remote") based on that name. However, it turns out that nobody really cares about the latter field. The only two sites that access it at all are: 1. git-merge, which uses it to notice when the branch does not have a remote defined. But we can easily replace this with looking at remote_name instead. 2. remote.c itself, when setting up the @{upstream} merge config. But we don't need to save the "remote" in the "struct branch" for that; we can just look it up for the duration of the operation. So there is no need to have both fields; they are redundant with each other (the struct remote contains the name, or you can look up the struct from the name). It would be nice to simplify this, especially as we are going to add matching pushremote config in a future patch (and it would be nice to keep them consistent). So which one do we keep and which one do we get rid of? If we had a lot of callers accessing the struct, it would be more efficient to keep it (since you have to do a lookup to go from the name to the struct, but not vice versa). But we don't have a lot of callers; we have exactly one, so efficiency doesn't matter. We can decide this based on simplicity and readability. And the meaning of the struct value is somewhat unclear. Is it always the remote matching remote_name? If remote_name is NULL (i.e., no per-branch config), does the struct fall back to the "origin" remote, or is it also NULL? These questions will get even more tricky with pushremotes, whose fallback behavior is more complicated. So let's just store the name, which pretty clearly represents the branch.*.remote config. Any lookup or fallback behavior can then be implemented in helper functions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-21remote.c: refactor setup of branch->merge listLibravatar Jeff King1-4/+15
When we call branch_get() to lookup or create a "struct branch", we make sure the "merge" field is filled in so that callers can access it. But the conditions under which we do so are a little confusing, and can lead to two funny situations: 1. If there's no branch.*.remote config, we cannot provide branch->merge (because it is really just an application of branch.*.merge to our remote's refspecs). But branch->merge_nr may be non-zero, leading callers to be believe they can access branch->merge (e.g., in branch_merge_matches and elsewhere). It doesn't look like this can cause a segfault in practice, as most code paths dealing with merge config will bail early if there is no remote defined. But it's a bit of a dangerous construct. We can fix this by setting merge_nr to "0" explicitly when we realize that we have no merge config. Note that merge_nr also counts the "merge_name" fields (which we _do_ have; that's how merge_nr got incremented), so we will "lose" access to them, in the sense that we forget how many we had. But no callers actually care; we use merge_name only while iteratively reading the config, and then convert it to the final "merge" form the first time somebody calls branch_get(). 2. We set up the "merge" field every time branch_get is called, even if it has already been done. This leaks memory. It's not a big deal in practice, since most code paths will access only one branch, or perhaps each branch only one time. But if you want to be pathological, you can leak arbitrary memory with: yes @{upstream} | head -1000 | git rev-list --stdin We can fix this by skipping setup when branch->merge is already non-NULL. In addition to those two fixes, this patch pushes the "do we need to setup merge?" logic down into set_merge, where it is a bit easier to follow. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-05-03remote.c: drop default_remote_name variableLibravatar Jeff King1-12/+11
When we read the remote config from disk, we update a default_remote_name variable if we see branch.*.remote config for the current branch. This isn't wrong, or even all that complicated, but it is a bit simpler (because it reduces our overall state) to just lazily compute the default when we need it. The ulterior motive here is that the push config uses a similar structure, and _is_ much more complicated as a result. That will be simplified in a future patch, and it's more readable if the logic for remotes and push-remotes matches. Note that we also used default_remote_name as a signal that the remote config has been loaded; after this patch, we now use an explicit flag. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-26Git 2.4.0-rc0Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+8
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-26Merge branch 'jk/test-chain-lint'Libravatar Junio C Hamano102-773/+459
People often forget to chain the commands in their test together with &&, leaving a failure from an earlier command in the test go unnoticed. The new GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT mechanism allows you to catch such a mistake more easily. * jk/test-chain-lint: (36 commits) t9001: drop save_confirm helper t0020: use test_* helpers instead of hand-rolled messages t: simplify loop exit-code status variables t: fix some trivial cases of ignored exit codes in loops t7701: fix ignored exit code inside loop t3305: fix ignored exit code inside loop t0020: fix ignored exit code inside loops perf-lib: fix ignored exit code inside loop t6039: fix broken && chain t9158, t9161: fix broken &&-chain in git-svn tests t9104: fix test for following larger parents t4104: drop hand-rolled error reporting t0005: fix broken &&-chains t7004: fix embedded single-quotes t0050: appease --chain-lint t9001: use test_when_finished t4117: use modern test_* helpers t6034: use modern test_* helpers t1301: use modern test_* helpers t0020: use modern test_* helpers ...
2015-03-26Merge branch 'sg/completion-gitcomp-nl-for-refs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-2/+2
Code clean-up. * sg/completion-gitcomp-nl-for-refs: completion: use __gitcomp_nl() for completing refs
2015-03-26Merge branch 'jc/report-path-error-to-dir'Libravatar Junio C Hamano4-44/+44
Code clean-up. * jc/report-path-error-to-dir: report_path_error(): move to dir.c
2015-03-25Getting ready for -rc0Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+52
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25Merge branch 'nd/doc-git-index-version'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+2
Doc clean-up. * nd/doc-git-index-version: git.txt: list index versions in plain English
2015-03-25Merge branch 'jk/run-command-capture'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-24/+44
The run-command interface was easy to abuse and make a pipe for us to read from the process, wait for the process to finish and then attempt to read its output, which is a pattern that lead to a deadlock. Fix such uses by introducing a helper to do this correctly (i.e. we need to read first and then wait the process to finish) and also add code to prevent such abuse in the run-command helper. * jk/run-command-capture: run-command: forbid using run_command with piped output trailer: use capture_command submodule: use capture_command wt-status: use capture_command run-command: introduce capture_command helper wt_status: fix signedness mismatch in strbuf_read call wt-status: don't flush before running "submodule status"
2015-03-25Merge branch 'tg/test-index-v4'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-3/+12
A test fix. * tg/test-index-v4: t1700: make test pass with index-v4
2015-03-25Merge branch 'jk/prune-with-corrupt-refs'Libravatar Junio C Hamano7-68/+147
"git prune" used to largely ignore broken refs when deciding which objects are still being used, which could spread an existing small damage and make it a larger one. * jk/prune-with-corrupt-refs: refs.c: drop curate_packed_refs repack: turn on "ref paranoia" when doing a destructive repack prune: turn on ref_paranoia flag refs: introduce a "ref paranoia" flag t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository
2015-03-25Merge branch 'tg/fix-check-order-with-split-index'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-19/+23
The split-index mode introduced at v2.3.0-rc0~41 was broken in the codepath to protect us against a broken reimplementation of Git that writes an invalid index with duplicated index entries, etc. * tg/fix-check-order-with-split-index: read-cache: fix reading of split index
2015-03-25Merge branch 'jk/fetch-pack'Libravatar Junio C Hamano3-13/+22
"git fetch" that fetches a commit using the allow-tip-sha1-in-want extension could have failed to fetch all the requested refs. * jk/fetch-pack: fetch-pack: remove dead assignment to ref->new_sha1 fetch_refs_via_pack: free extra copy of refs filter_ref: make a copy of extra "sought" entries filter_ref: avoid overwriting ref->old_sha1 with garbage
2015-03-25Merge branch 'jk/cleanup-failed-clone'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-5/+6
An failure early in the "git clone" that started creating the working tree and repository could have resulted in some directories and files left without getting cleaned up. * jk/cleanup-failed-clone: clone: drop period from end of die_errno message clone: initialize atexit cleanup handler earlier
2015-03-25Merge branch 'jc/submitting-patches-mention-send-email'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-0/+5
Recommend format-patch and send-email for those who want to submit patches to this project. * jc/submitting-patches-mention-send-email: SubmittingPatches: encourage users to use format-patch and send-email
2015-03-25Merge branch 'dj/log-graph-with-no-walk'Libravatar Junio C Hamano6-7/+23
"git log --graph --no-walk A B..." is a otcnflicting request that asks nonsense; no-walk tells us show discrete points in the history, while graph asks to draw connections between these discrete points. Forbid the combination. * dj/log-graph-with-no-walk: revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk
2015-03-25Merge branch 'kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent'Libravatar Junio C Hamano3-3/+11
"git rev-list --bisect --first-parent" does not work (yet) and can even cause SEGV; forbid it. "git log --bisect --first-parent" would not be useful until "git bisect --first-parent" materializes, so it is also forbidden for now. * kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent: rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisect
2015-03-25Merge branch 'ws/grep-quiet-no-pager'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
Even though "git grep --quiet" is run merely to ask for the exit status, we spawned the pager regardless. Stop doing that. * ws/grep-quiet-no-pager: grep: fix "--quiet" overwriting current output
2015-03-25Merge branch 'jk/simplify-csum-file-sha1fd-check'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-7/+3
Code simplification. * jk/simplify-csum-file-sha1fd-check: sha1fd_check: die when we cannot open the file
2015-03-25Merge branch 'ct/prompt-untracked-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+12
The prompt script (in contrib/) did not show the untracked sign when working in a subdirectory without any untracked files. * ct/prompt-untracked-fix: git prompt: use toplevel to find untracked files
2015-03-25t9001: drop save_confirm helperLibravatar Jeff King1-10/+5
The idea of this helper is that we want to save the current value of a config variable and then restore it again after the test completes. However, there's no point in actually saving the value; it should always be restored to the string "never" (which you can confirm by instrumenting save_confirm to print the value it finds). Let's just replace it with a single test_when_finished call. Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t0020: use test_* helpers instead of hand-rolled messagesLibravatar Jeff King1-33/+5
These tests are not wrong, but it is much shorter and more idiomatic to say "verbose" or "test_must_fail" rather than printing our own messages on failure. Likewise, there is no need to say "happy" at the end of a test; the test suite takes care of that. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t: simplify loop exit-code status variablesLibravatar Jeff King2-16/+6
Since shell loops may drop the exit code of failed commands inside the loop, some tests try to keep track of the status by setting a variable. This can end up cumbersome and hard to read; it is much simpler to just exit directly from the loop using "return 1" (since each case is either in a helper function or inside a test snippet). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t: fix some trivial cases of ignored exit codes in loopsLibravatar Jeff King10-28/+24
These are all cases where we do a setup step of the form: for i in $foo; do set_up $i || break done && more_setup would not notice a failure in set_up (because break always returns a 0 exit code). These are just setup steps that we do not expect to fail, but it does not hurt to be defensive. Most can be fixed by converting the "break" to a "return 1" (since we eval our tests inside a function for just this purpose). A few of the loops are inside subshells, so we can use just "exit 1" to break out of the subshell. And a few can actually be made shorter by just unrolling the loop. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t7701: fix ignored exit code inside loopLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When checking a list of file mtimes, we use a loop and break out early from the loop if any entry does not match. However, the exit code of a loop exited via break is always 0, meaning that the test will fail to notice we had a mismatch. Since the loop is inside a function, we can fix this by doing an early "return 1". Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t3305: fix ignored exit code inside loopLibravatar Jeff King1-6/+3
When we test deleting notes, we run "git notes remove" in a loop. However, the exit value of the loop will only reflect the final note we process. We should break out of the loop with a failing exit code as soon as we see a problem. Note that we can call "exit 1" here without explicitly creating a subshell, because the while loop on the right-hand side of a pipe executes in its own implicit subshell. Note also that the "break" above does not suffer the same problem; it is meant to exit the loop early at a certain number of iterations. We can bump it into the conditional of the loop to make this more obvious. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t0020: fix ignored exit code inside loopsLibravatar Jeff King1-35/+19
A loop like: for f in one two; do something $f || break done will correctly break out of the loop when we see a failure of one item, but the resulting exit code will always be zero. We can fix that by putting the loop into a function or subshell, but in this case it is simpler still to just unroll the loop. We do add a helper function, which hopefully makes the end result even more readable (in addition to being shorter). Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25perf-lib: fix ignored exit code inside loopLibravatar Jeff King1-1/+1
When copying the test repository, we try to detect whether the copy succeeded. However, most of the heavy lifting is done inside a for loop, where our "break" will lose the exit code of the failing "cp". We can take advantage of the fact that we are in a subshell, and just "exit 1" to break out with a code. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-24Merge branch 'master' of git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitkLibravatar Junio C Hamano13-3482/+6449
* 'master' of git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk: gitk: Update .po files gitk: l10n: Add Catalan translation gitk: Fix typo in Russian translation gitk: Remove tcl-format flag from a message that shouldn't have it gitk: Pass --invert-grep option down to "git log" gitk: Synchronize config file writes gitk: Report errors in saving config file gitk: Only write changed configuration variables gitk: Enable mouse horizontal scrolling in diff pane gitk: Default wrcomcmd to use --pretty=email
2015-03-24report_path_error(): move to dir.cLibravatar Junio C Hamano4-44/+44
The expected call sequence is for the caller to use match_pathspec() repeatedly on a set of pathspecs, accumulating the "hits" in a separate array, and then call this function to diagnose a pathspec that never matched anything, as that can indicate a typo from the command line, e.g. "git commit Maekfile". Many builtin commands use this function from builtin/ls-files.c, which is not a very healthy arrangement. ls-files might have been the first command to feel the need for such a helper, but the need is shared by everybody who uses the "match and then report" pattern. Move it to dir.c where match_pathspec() is defined. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-24git.txt: list index versions in plain EnglishLibravatar Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy1-1/+2
At the first look, a user may think the default version is "23". Even with UNIX background, there's no reference anywhere close that may indicate this is glob or regex. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-23Sync with v2.3.4Libravatar Junio C Hamano2-1/+34
2015-03-23Post 2.3 cycle (batch #12)Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-15/+46
Hopefully with another batch or two, we would be ready for -rc0 to close this cycle. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-23Merge branch 'js/completion-ctags-pattern-substitution-fix'Libravatar Junio C Hamano1-1/+1
The code that reads from the ctags file in the completion script (in contrib/) did not spell ${param/pattern/string} substitution correctly, which happened to work with bash but not with zsh. * js/completion-ctags-pattern-substitution-fix: contrib/completion: escape the forward slash in __git_match_ctag
2015-03-23Merge branch 'jk/push-config'Libravatar Junio C Hamano4-9/+24
Restructure "git push" codepath to make it easier to add new configuration bits and then add push.followTags configuration that turns --follow-tags option on by default. * jk/push-config: push: allow --follow-tags to be set by config push.followTags cmd_push: pass "flags" pointer to config callback cmd_push: set "atomic" bit directly git_push_config: drop cargo-culted wt_status pointer
2015-03-23Merge branch 'nd/config-doc-camelCase'Libravatar Junio C Hamano37-212/+212
Documentation updates. * nd/config-doc-camelCase: *config.txt: stick to camelCase naming convention
2015-03-23Merge branch 'jk/test-annoyances'Libravatar Junio C Hamano5-15/+24
Test fixes. * jk/test-annoyances: t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper t5541: move run_with_cmdline_limit to test-lib.sh t: pass GIT_TRACE through Apache t: redirect stderr GIT_TRACE to descriptor 4 t: translate SIGINT to an exit