diff options
Diffstat (limited to 't')
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh | 430 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh | 333 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh | 144 |
3 files changed, 829 insertions, 78 deletions
diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh index e1cef58f2a..d23b948f27 100755 --- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh +++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh @@ -64,15 +64,12 @@ test_expect_success 'merge simple rename+criss-cross with no modifications' ' git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 3 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >expect \ - L2:three R2:three \ L2:three R2:three && git rev-parse >actual \ :2:three :3:three && - git hash-object >>actual \ - three~HEAD three~R2^0 && test_cmp expect actual ) ' @@ -140,15 +137,12 @@ test_expect_success 'merge criss-cross + rename merges with basic modification' git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 3 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >expect \ - L2:three R2:three \ L2:three R2:three && git rev-parse >actual \ :2:three :3:three && - git hash-object >>actual \ - three~HEAD three~R2^0 && test_cmp expect actual ) ' @@ -185,7 +179,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of rename/add conflict' ' git branch B && git checkout -b C && echo 10 >>a && - echo "other content" >>new_a && + test_write_lines 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 foobar >new_a && git add a new_a && test_tick && git commit -m C && @@ -195,14 +189,14 @@ test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of rename/add conflict' ' git checkout B^0 && test_must_fail git merge C && - git clean -f && + git show :2:new_a >new_a && + git add new_a && test_tick && git commit -m D && git tag D && git checkout C^0 && test_must_fail git merge B && - rm new_a~HEAD new_a && - printf "Incorrectly merged content" >>new_a && + test_write_lines 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 bad_merge >new_a && git add -u && test_tick && git commit -m E && git tag E @@ -225,21 +219,74 @@ test_expect_success 'git detects differently handled merges conflict' ' test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >expect \ - D:new_a E:new_a && + C:new_a D:new_a E:new_a && git rev-parse >actual \ - :2:new_a :3:new_a && + :1:new_a :2:new_a :3:new_a && test_cmp expect actual && - git cat-file -p C:new_a >ours && - git cat-file -p B:new_a >theirs && + # Test that the two-way merge in new_a is as expected + git cat-file -p D:new_a >ours && + git cat-file -p E:new_a >theirs && >empty && test_must_fail git merge-file \ - -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \ + -L "HEAD" \ -L "" \ - -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \ + -L "E^0" \ ours empty theirs && sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1\1/" ours >expect && - git cat-file -p :1:new_a >actual && + git hash-object new_a >actual && + git hash-object ours >expect && + test_cmp expect actual + ) +' + +# Repeat the above testcase with precisely the same setup, other than with +# the two merge bases having different orderings of commit timestamps so +# that they are reversed in the order they are provided to merge-recursive, +# so that we can improve code coverage. +test_expect_success 'git detects differently handled merges conflict, swapped' ' + ( + cd rename-add && + + # Difference #1: Do cleanup from previous testrun + git reset --hard && + git clean -fdqx && + + # Difference #2: Change commit timestamps + btime=$(git log --no-walk --date=raw --format=%cd B | awk "{print \$1}") && + ctime=$(git log --no-walk --date=raw --format=%cd C | awk "{print \$1}") && + newctime=$(($btime+1)) && + git fast-export --no-data --all | sed -e s/$ctime/$newctime/ | git fast-import --force --quiet && + # End of differences; rest is copy-paste of last test + + git checkout D^0 && + test_must_fail git merge -s recursive E^0 && + + git ls-files -s >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + git ls-files -u >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + git ls-files -o >out && + test_line_count = 1 out && + + git rev-parse >expect \ + C:new_a D:new_a E:new_a && + git rev-parse >actual \ + :1:new_a :2:new_a :3:new_a && + test_cmp expect actual && + + # Test that the two-way merge in new_a is as expected + git cat-file -p D:new_a >ours && + git cat-file -p E:new_a >theirs && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "E^0" \ + ours empty theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1\1/" ours >expect && + git hash-object new_a >actual && + git hash-object ours >expect && test_cmp expect actual ) ' @@ -1402,4 +1449,349 @@ test_expect_failure 'check conflicting modes for regular file' ' ) ' +# Setup: +# L1---L2 +# / \ / \ +# master X ? +# \ / \ / +# R1---R2 +# +# Where: +# master has two files, named 'b' and 'a' +# branches L1 and R1 both modify each of the two files in conflicting ways +# +# L2 is a merge of R1 into L1; more on it later. +# R2 is a merge of L1 into R1; more on it later. +# +# X is an auto-generated merge-base used when merging L2 and R2. +# since X is a merge of L1 and R1, it has conflicting versions of each file +# +# More about L2 and R2: +# - both resolve the conflicts in 'b' and 'a' differently +# - L2 renames 'b' to 'm' +# - R2 renames 'a' to 'm' +# +# In the end, in file 'm' we have four different conflicting files (from +# two versions of 'b' and two of 'a'). In addition, if +# merge.conflictstyle is diff3, then the base version also has +# conflict markers of its own, leading to a total of three levels of +# conflict markers. This is a pretty weird corner case, but we just want +# to ensure that we handle it as well as practical. + +test_expect_success 'setup nested conflicts' ' + test_create_repo nested_conflicts && + ( + cd nested_conflicts && + + # Create some related files now + for i in $(test_seq 1 10) + do + echo Random base content line $i + done >initial && + + cp initial b_L1 && + cp initial b_R1 && + cp initial b_L2 && + cp initial b_R2 && + cp initial a_L1 && + cp initial a_R1 && + cp initial a_L2 && + cp initial a_R2 && + + test_write_lines b b_L1 >>b_L1 && + test_write_lines b b_R1 >>b_R1 && + test_write_lines b b_L2 >>b_L2 && + test_write_lines b b_R2 >>b_R2 && + test_write_lines a a_L1 >>a_L1 && + test_write_lines a a_R1 >>a_R1 && + test_write_lines a a_L2 >>a_L2 && + test_write_lines a a_R2 >>a_R2 && + + # Setup original commit (or merge-base), consisting of + # files named "b" and "a" + cp initial b && + cp initial a && + echo b >>b && + echo a >>a && + git add b a && + test_tick && git commit -m initial && + + git branch L && + git branch R && + + # Handle the left side + git checkout L && + mv -f b_L1 b && + mv -f a_L1 a && + git add b a && + test_tick && git commit -m "version L1 of files" && + git tag L1 && + + # Handle the right side + git checkout R && + mv -f b_R1 b && + mv -f a_R1 a && + git add b a && + test_tick && git commit -m "verson R1 of files" && + git tag R1 && + + # Create first merge on left side + git checkout L && + test_must_fail git merge R1 && + mv -f b_L2 b && + mv -f a_L2 a && + git add b a && + git mv b m && + test_tick && git commit -m "left merge, rename b->m" && + git tag L2 && + + # Create first merge on right side + git checkout R && + test_must_fail git merge L1 && + mv -f b_R2 b && + mv -f a_R2 a && + git add b a && + git mv a m && + test_tick && git commit -m "right merge, rename a->m" && + git tag R2 + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts' ' + ( + cd nested_conflicts && + + git clean -f && + git checkout L2^0 && + + # Merge must fail; there is a conflict + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictstyle=diff3 merge -s recursive R2^0 && + + # Make sure the index has the right number of entries + git ls-files -s >out && + test_line_count = 2 out && + git ls-files -u >out && + test_line_count = 2 out && + # Ensure we have the correct number of untracked files + git ls-files -o >out && + test_line_count = 1 out && + + # Create a and b from virtual merge base X + git cat-file -p master:a >base && + git cat-file -p L1:a >ours && + git cat-file -p R1:a >theirs && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \ + -L "merged common ancestors" \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \ + ours \ + base \ + theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<|=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >vmb_a && + + git cat-file -p master:b >base && + git cat-file -p L1:b >ours && + git cat-file -p R1:b >theirs && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \ + -L "merged common ancestors" \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \ + ours \ + base \ + theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<|=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >vmb_b && + + # Compare :2:m to expected values + git cat-file -p L2:m >ours && + git cat-file -p R2:b >theirs && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "HEAD:m" \ + -L "merged common ancestors:b" \ + -L "R2^0:b" \ + ours \ + vmb_b \ + theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<|=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >m_stage_2 && + git cat-file -p :2:m >actual && + test_cmp m_stage_2 actual && + + # Compare :3:m to expected values + git cat-file -p L2:a >ours && + git cat-file -p R2:m >theirs && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "HEAD:a" \ + -L "merged common ancestors:a" \ + -L "R2^0:m" \ + ours \ + vmb_a \ + theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<|=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >m_stage_3 && + git cat-file -p :3:m >actual && + test_cmp m_stage_3 actual && + + # Compare m to expected contents + >empty && + cp m_stage_2 expected_final_m && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "merged common ancestors" \ + -L "R2^0" \ + expected_final_m \ + empty \ + m_stage_3 && + test_cmp expected_final_m m + ) +' + +# Setup: +# L1---L2---L3 +# / \ / \ / \ +# master X1 X2 ? +# \ / \ / \ / +# R1---R2---R3 +# +# Where: +# master has one file named 'content' +# branches L1 and R1 both modify each of the two files in conflicting ways +# +# L<n> (n>1) is a merge of R<n-1> into L<n-1> +# R<n> (n>1) is a merge of L<n-1> into R<n-1> +# L<n> and R<n> resolve the conflicts differently. +# +# X<n> is an auto-generated merge-base used when merging L<n+1> and R<n+1>. +# By construction, X1 has conflict markers due to conflicting versions. +# X2, due to using merge.conflictstyle=3, has nested conflict markers. +# +# So, merging R3 into L3 using merge.conflictstyle=3 should show the +# nested conflict markers from X2 in the base version -- that means we +# have three levels of conflict markers. Can we distinguish all three? + +test_expect_success 'setup virtual merge base with nested conflicts' ' + test_create_repo virtual_merge_base_has_nested_conflicts && + ( + cd virtual_merge_base_has_nested_conflicts && + + # Create some related files now + for i in $(test_seq 1 10) + do + echo Random base content line $i + done >content && + + # Setup original commit + git add content && + test_tick && git commit -m initial && + + git branch L && + git branch R && + + # Create L1 + git checkout L && + echo left >>content && + git add content && + test_tick && git commit -m "version L1 of content" && + git tag L1 && + + # Create R1 + git checkout R && + echo right >>content && + git add content && + test_tick && git commit -m "verson R1 of content" && + git tag R1 && + + # Create L2 + git checkout L && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictstyle=diff3 merge R1 && + git checkout L1 content && + test_tick && git commit -m "version L2 of content" && + git tag L2 && + + # Create R2 + git checkout R && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictstyle=diff3 merge L1 && + git checkout R1 content && + test_tick && git commit -m "version R2 of content" && + git tag R2 && + + # Create L3 + git checkout L && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictstyle=diff3 merge R2 && + git checkout L1 content && + test_tick && git commit -m "version L3 of content" && + git tag L3 && + + # Create R3 + git checkout R && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictstyle=diff3 merge L2 && + git checkout R1 content && + test_tick && git commit -m "version R3 of content" && + git tag R3 + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'check virtual merge base with nested conflicts' ' + ( + cd virtual_merge_base_has_nested_conflicts && + + git checkout L3^0 && + + # Merge must fail; there is a conflict + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictstyle=diff3 merge -s recursive R3^0 && + + # Make sure the index has the right number of entries + git ls-files -s >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + git ls-files -u >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + # Ensure we have the correct number of untracked files + git ls-files -o >out && + test_line_count = 1 out && + + # Compare :[23]:content to expected values + git rev-parse L1:content R1:content >expect && + git rev-parse :2:content :3:content >actual && + test_cmp expect actual && + + # Imitate X1 merge base, except without long enough conflict + # markers because a subsequent sed will modify them. Put + # result into vmb. + git cat-file -p master:content >base && + git cat-file -p L:content >left && + git cat-file -p R:content >right && + cp left merged-once && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \ + -L "merged common ancestors" \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \ + merged-once \ + base \ + right && + sed -e "s/^\([<|=>]\)/\1\1\1/" merged-once >vmb && + + # Imitate X2 merge base, overwriting vmb. Note that we + # extend both sets of conflict markers to make them longer + # with the sed command. + cp left merged-twice && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 1" \ + -L "merged common ancestors" \ + -L "Temporary merge branch 2" \ + merged-twice \ + vmb \ + right && + sed -e "s/^\([<|=>]\)/\1\1\1/" merged-twice >vmb && + + # Compare :1:content to expected value + git cat-file -p :1:content >actual && + test_cmp vmb actual && + + # Determine expected content in final outer merge, compare to + # what the merge generated. + cp -f left expect && + test_must_fail git merge-file --diff3 \ + -L "HEAD" -L "merged common ancestors" -L "R3^0" \ + expect vmb right && + test_cmp expect content + ) +' + test_done diff --git a/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh index b97aca7fa2..7cc34e7579 100755 --- a/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh +++ b/t/t6042-merge-rename-corner-cases.sh @@ -464,17 +464,28 @@ test_expect_success 'handle rename/rename (2to1) conflict correctly' ' git ls-files -u c >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 3 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && test_path_is_missing a && test_path_is_missing b && - test_path_is_file c~HEAD && - test_path_is_file c~C^0 && - git rev-parse >expect \ - C:a B:b && - git hash-object >actual \ - c~HEAD c~C^0 && + git rev-parse >expect \ + C:a B:b && + git rev-parse >actual \ + :2:c :3:c && + test_cmp expect actual && + + # Test that the two-way merge in new_a is as expected + git cat-file -p :2:c >>ours && + git cat-file -p :3:c >>theirs && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "C^0" \ + ours empty theirs && + git hash-object c >actual && + git hash-object ours >expect && test_cmp expect actual ) ' @@ -673,7 +684,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rename/rename/add-dest merge still knows about conflicting git ls-files -u c >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 5 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >expect \ A:a C:b B:b C:c B:c && @@ -681,14 +692,27 @@ test_expect_success 'rename/rename/add-dest merge still knows about conflicting :1:a :2:b :3:b :2:c :3:c && test_cmp expect actual && - git rev-parse >expect \ - C:c B:c C:b B:b && - git hash-object >actual \ - c~HEAD c~B\^0 b~HEAD b~B\^0 && - test_cmp expect actual && + # Record some contents for re-doing merges + git cat-file -p A:a >stuff && + git cat-file -p C:b >important_info && + git cat-file -p B:c >precious_data && + >empty && - test_path_is_missing b && - test_path_is_missing c + # Test the merge in b + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + important_info empty stuff && + test_cmp important_info b && + + # Test the merge in c + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + stuff empty precious_data && + test_cmp stuff c ) ' @@ -937,4 +961,283 @@ test_expect_failure 'mod6-check: chains of rename/rename(1to2) and rename/rename ) ' +test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames() { + sideL=$1 + sideR=$2 + + # Setup: + # L + # / \ + # master ? + # \ / + # R + # + # Where: + # Both L and R have files named 'three' which collide. Each of + # the colliding files could have been involved in a rename, in + # which case there was a file named 'one' or 'two' that was + # modified on the opposite side of history and renamed into the + # collision on this side of history. + # + # Questions: + # 1) The index should contain both a stage 2 and stage 3 entry + # for the colliding file. Does it? + # 2) When renames are involved, the content merges are clean, so + # the index should reflect the content merges, not merely the + # version of the colliding file from the prior commit. Does + # it? + # 3) There should be a file in the worktree named 'three' + # containing the two-way merged contents of the content-merged + # versions of 'three' from each of the two colliding + # files. Is it present? + # 4) There should not be any three~* files in the working + # tree + test_expect_success "setup simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" ' + test_create_repo simple_${sideL}_${sideR} && + ( + cd simple_${sideL}_${sideR} && + + # Create some related files now + for i in $(test_seq 1 10) + do + echo Random base content line $i + done >file_v1 && + cp file_v1 file_v2 && + echo modification >>file_v2 && + + cp file_v1 file_v3 && + echo more stuff >>file_v3 && + cp file_v3 file_v4 && + echo yet more stuff >>file_v4 && + + # Use a tag to record both these files for simple + # access, and clean out these untracked files + git tag file_v1 $(git hash-object -w file_v1) && + git tag file_v2 $(git hash-object -w file_v2) && + git tag file_v3 $(git hash-object -w file_v3) && + git tag file_v4 $(git hash-object -w file_v4) && + git clean -f && + + # Setup original commit (or merge-base), consisting of + # files named "one" and "two" if renames were involved. + touch irrelevant_file && + git add irrelevant_file && + if [ $sideL = "rename" ] + then + git show file_v1 >one && + git add one + fi && + if [ $sideR = "rename" ] + then + git show file_v3 >two && + git add two + fi && + test_tick && git commit -m initial && + + git branch L && + git branch R && + + # Handle the left side + git checkout L && + if [ $sideL = "rename" ] + then + git mv one three + else + git show file_v2 >three && + git add three + fi && + if [ $sideR = "rename" ] + then + git show file_v4 >two && + git add two + fi && + test_tick && git commit -m L && + + # Handle the right side + git checkout R && + if [ $sideL = "rename" ] + then + git show file_v2 >one && + git add one + fi && + if [ $sideR = "rename" ] + then + git mv two three + else + git show file_v4 >three && + git add three + fi && + test_tick && git commit -m R + ) + ' + + test_expect_success "check simple $sideL/$sideR conflict" ' + ( + cd simple_${sideL}_${sideR} && + + git checkout L^0 && + + # Merge must fail; there is a conflict + test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R^0 && + + # Make sure the index has the right number of entries + git ls-files -s >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + git ls-files -u >out && + test_line_count = 2 out && + # Ensure we have the correct number of untracked files + git ls-files -o >out && + test_line_count = 1 out && + + # Nothing should have touched irrelevant_file + git rev-parse >actual \ + :0:irrelevant_file \ + :2:three \ + :3:three && + git rev-parse >expected \ + master:irrelevant_file \ + file_v2 \ + file_v4 && + test_cmp expected actual && + + # Make sure we have the correct merged contents for + # three + git show file_v1 >expected && + cat <<-\EOF >>expected && + <<<<<<< HEAD + modification + ======= + more stuff + yet more stuff + >>>>>>> R^0 + EOF + + test_cmp expected three + ) + ' +} + +test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames rename rename +test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames rename add +test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add rename +test_conflicts_with_adds_and_renames add add + +# Setup: +# L +# / \ +# master ? +# \ / +# R +# +# Where: +# master has two files, named 'one' and 'two'. +# branches L and R both modify 'one', in conflicting ways. +# branches L and R both modify 'two', in conflicting ways. +# branch L also renames 'one' to 'three'. +# branch R also renames 'two' to 'three'. +# +# So, we have four different conflicting files that all end up at path +# 'three'. +test_expect_success 'setup nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' ' + test_create_repo nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && + ( + cd nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && + + # Create some related files now + for i in $(test_seq 1 10) + do + echo Random base content line $i + done >file_v1 && + + cp file_v1 file_v2 && + cp file_v1 file_v3 && + cp file_v1 file_v4 && + cp file_v1 file_v5 && + cp file_v1 file_v6 && + + echo one >>file_v1 && + echo uno >>file_v2 && + echo eins >>file_v3 && + + echo two >>file_v4 && + echo dos >>file_v5 && + echo zwei >>file_v6 && + + # Setup original commit (or merge-base), consisting of + # files named "one" and "two". + mv file_v1 one && + mv file_v4 two && + git add one two && + test_tick && git commit -m english && + + git branch L && + git branch R && + + # Handle the left side + git checkout L && + git mv one three && + mv -f file_v2 three && + mv -f file_v5 two && + git add two three && + test_tick && git commit -m spanish && + + # Handle the right side + git checkout R && + git mv two three && + mv -f file_v3 one && + mv -f file_v6 three && + git add one three && + test_tick && git commit -m german + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'check nested conflicts from rename/rename(2to1)' ' + ( + cd nested_conflicts_from_rename_rename && + + git checkout L^0 && + + # Merge must fail; there is a conflict + test_must_fail git merge -s recursive R^0 && + + # Make sure the index has the right number of entries + git ls-files -s >out && + test_line_count = 2 out && + git ls-files -u >out && + test_line_count = 2 out && + # Ensure we have the correct number of untracked files + git ls-files -o >out && + test_line_count = 1 out && + + # Compare :2:three to expected values + git cat-file -p master:one >base && + git cat-file -p L:three >ours && + git cat-file -p R:one >theirs && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD:three" -L "" -L "R^0:one" \ + ours base theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >L-three && + git cat-file -p :2:three >expect && + test_cmp expect L-three && + + # Compare :2:three to expected values + git cat-file -p master:two >base && + git cat-file -p L:two >ours && + git cat-file -p R:three >theirs && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD:two" -L "" -L "R^0:three" \ + ours base theirs && + sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1/" ours >R-three && + git cat-file -p :3:three >expect && + test_cmp expect R-three && + + # Compare three to expected contents + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" -L "" -L "R^0" \ + L-three empty R-three && + test_cmp three L-three + ) +' + test_done diff --git a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh index 4a71f17edd..62c564707b 100755 --- a/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh +++ b/t/t6043-merge-rename-directories.sh @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ test_expect_success '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) con git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 3 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >actual \ :0:x/b :0:x/c :0:x/d :0:x/e :0:x/m :0:x/n && @@ -293,15 +293,16 @@ test_expect_success '1d-check: Directory renames cause a rename/rename(2to1) con A:y/wham B:z/wham && test_cmp expect actual && - test_path_is_missing x/wham && - test_path_is_file x/wham~HEAD && - test_path_is_file x/wham~B^0 && - - git hash-object >actual \ - x/wham~HEAD x/wham~B^0 && - git rev-parse >expect \ - A:y/wham B:z/wham && - test_cmp expect actual + # Test that the two-way merge in x/wham is as expected + git cat-file -p :2:x/wham >expect && + git cat-file -p :3:x/wham >other && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + expect empty other && + test_cmp expect x/wham ) ' @@ -1077,7 +1078,7 @@ test_expect_success '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/renam git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 6 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 3 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >actual \ :0:y/b :0:y/c :0:y/e && @@ -1093,9 +1094,9 @@ test_expect_success '5c-check: Transitive rename would cause rename/rename/renam test_cmp expect actual && git hash-object >actual \ - w/d~HEAD w/d~B^0 z/d && + z/d && git rev-parse >expect \ - O:x/d B:w/d O:x/d && + O:x/d && test_cmp expect actual && test_path_is_missing x/d && test_path_is_file y/d && @@ -1670,7 +1671,7 @@ test_expect_success '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive r git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 3 out && + test_line_count = 1 out && git rev-parse >actual \ :0:y/b :0:y/c :2:y/d :3:y/d && @@ -1678,15 +1679,16 @@ test_expect_success '7b-check: rename/rename(2to1), but only due to transitive r O:z/b O:z/c O:w/d O:x/d && test_cmp expect actual && - test_path_is_missing y/d && - test_path_is_file y/d~HEAD && - test_path_is_file y/d~B^0 && - - git hash-object >actual \ - y/d~HEAD y/d~B^0 && - git rev-parse >expect \ - O:w/d O:x/d && - test_cmp expect actual + # Test that the two-way merge in y/d is as expected + git cat-file -p :2:y/d >expect && + git cat-file -p :3:y/d >other && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + expect empty other && + test_cmp expect y/d ) ' @@ -3161,11 +3163,48 @@ test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2) ) ' +test_expect_success '10c-check: Overwrite untracked with dir rename/rename(1to2), other direction' ' + ( + cd 10c && + + git reset --hard && + git clean -fdqx && + + git checkout B^0 && + mkdir y && + echo important >y/c && + + test_must_fail git merge -s recursive A^0 >out 2>err && + test_i18ngrep "CONFLICT (rename/rename)" out && + test_i18ngrep "Refusing to lose untracked file at y/c; adding as y/c~HEAD instead" out && + + git ls-files -s >out && + test_line_count = 6 out && + git ls-files -u >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + git ls-files -o >out && + test_line_count = 3 out && + + git rev-parse >actual \ + :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:x/d :1:x/c :3:w/c :2:y/c && + git rev-parse >expect \ + O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c O:x/c && + test_cmp expect actual && + + git hash-object y/c~HEAD >actual && + git rev-parse O:x/c >expect && + test_cmp expect actual && + + echo important >expect && + test_cmp expect y/c + ) +' + # Testcase 10d, Delete untracked w/ dir rename/rename(2to1) # Commit O: z/{a,b,c_1}, x/{d,e,f_2} # Commit A: y/{a,b}, x/{d,e,f_2,wham_1} + untracked y/wham # Commit B: z/{a,b,c_1,wham_2}, y/{d,e} -# Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b,d,e} + untracked y/{wham,wham~B^0,wham~HEAD}+ +# Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b,d,e} + untracked y/{wham,wham~merged}+ # CONFLICT(rename/rename) z/c_1 vs x/f_2 -> y/wham # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose untracked file at y/wham) @@ -3219,7 +3258,7 @@ test_expect_success '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 4 out && + test_line_count = 3 out && git rev-parse >actual \ :0:y/a :0:y/b :0:y/d :0:y/e :2:y/wham :3:y/wham && @@ -3232,11 +3271,16 @@ test_expect_success '10d-check: Delete untracked with dir rename/rename(2to1)' ' echo important >expect && test_cmp expect y/wham && - git hash-object >actual \ - y/wham~B^0 y/wham~HEAD && - git rev-parse >expect \ - O:x/f O:z/c && - test_cmp expect actual + # Test that the two-way merge in y/wham~merged is as expected + git cat-file -p :2:y/wham >expect && + git cat-file -p :3:y/wham >other && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + expect empty other && + test_cmp expect y/wham~merged ) ' @@ -3665,7 +3709,7 @@ test_expect_success '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rena git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 4 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 4 out && + test_line_count = 3 out && echo different >expected && echo mods >>expected && @@ -3677,11 +3721,17 @@ test_expect_success '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rena O:z/a O:z/b O:x/d O:x/c O:x/c A:y/c O:x/c && test_cmp expect actual && - git hash-object >actual \ - y/c~B^0 y/c~HEAD && - git rev-parse >expect \ - O:x/c A:y/c && - test_cmp expect actual + # See if y/c~merged has expected contents; requires manually + # doing the expected file merge + git cat-file -p A:y/c >c1 && + git cat-file -p B:z/c >c2 && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + c1 empty c2 && + test_cmp c1 y/c~merged ) ' @@ -3689,7 +3739,7 @@ test_expect_success '11e-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rena # Commit O: z/{a,b}, x/{c_1,d_2} # Commit A: y/{a,b,wham_1}, x/d_2, except y/wham has uncommitted mods # Commit B: z/{a,b,wham_2}, x/c_1 -# Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + untracked y/{wham~B^0,wham~B^HEAD} + +# Expected: Failed Merge; y/{a,b} + untracked y/{wham~merged} + # y/wham with dirty changes from before merge + # CONFLICT(rename/rename) x/c vs x/d -> y/wham # ERROR_MSG(Refusing to lose dirty file at y/wham) @@ -3741,24 +3791,30 @@ test_expect_success '11f-check: Avoid deleting not-uptodate with dir rename/rena git ls-files -u >out && test_line_count = 2 out && git ls-files -o >out && - test_line_count = 4 out && + test_line_count = 3 out && test_seq 1 10 >expected && echo important >>expected && test_cmp expected y/wham && test_must_fail git rev-parse :1:y/wham && - git hash-object >actual \ - y/wham~B^0 y/wham~HEAD && - git rev-parse >expect \ - O:x/d O:x/c && - test_cmp expect actual && git rev-parse >actual \ :0:y/a :0:y/b :2:y/wham :3:y/wham && git rev-parse >expect \ O:z/a O:z/b O:x/c O:x/d && - test_cmp expect actual + test_cmp expect actual && + + # Test that the two-way merge in y/wham~merged is as expected + git cat-file -p :2:y/wham >expect && + git cat-file -p :3:y/wham >other && + >empty && + test_must_fail git merge-file \ + -L "HEAD" \ + -L "" \ + -L "B^0" \ + expect empty other && + test_cmp expect y/wham~merged ) ' |