diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/tutorial.txt | 413 |
1 files changed, 413 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/tutorial.txt b/Documentation/tutorial.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b8836a5ad8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/tutorial.txt @@ -0,0 +1,413 @@ +A short git tutorial +==================== +May 2005 + + +Introduction +------------ + +This is trying to be a short tutorial on setting up and using a git +archive, mainly because being hands-on and using explicit examples is +often the best way of explaining what is going on. + +In normal life, most people wouldn't use the "core" git programs +directly, but rather script around them to make them more palatable. +Understanding the core git stuff may help some people get those scripts +done, though, and it may also be instructive in helping people +understand what it is that the higher-level helper scripts are actually +doing. + +The core git is often called "plumbing", with the prettier user +interfaces on top of it called "porcelain". You may want to know what +the plumbing does for when the porcelain isn't flushing... + + +Creating a git archive +---------------------- + +Creating a new git archive couldn't be easier: all git archives start +out empty, and the only thing you need to do is find yourself a +subdirectory that you want to use as a working tree - either an empty +one for a totally new project, or an existing working tree that you want +to import into git. + +For our first example, we're going to start a totally new arhive from +scratch, with no pre-existing files, and we'll call it "git-tutorial". +To start up, create a subdirectory for it, change into that +subdirectory, and initialize the git infrastructure with "git-init-db": + + mkdir git-tutorial + cd git-tutorial + git-init-db + +to which git will reply + + defaulting to local storage area + +which is just gits way of saying that you haven't been doing anything +strange, and that it will have created a local .git directory setup for +your new project. You will now have a ".git" directory, and you can +inspect that with "ls". For your new empty project, ls should show you +three entries: + + - a symlink called HEAD, pointing to "refs/heads/master" + + Don't worry about the fact that the file that the HEAD link points to + dosn't even exist yet - you haven't created the commit that will + start your HEAD development branch yet. + + - a subdirectory called "objects", which will contain all the git SHA1 + objects of your project. You should never have any real reason to + look at the objects directly, but you might want to know that these + objects are what contains all the real _data_ in your repository. + + - a subdirectory called "refs", which contains references to objects. + + In particular, the "refs" subdirectory will contain two other + subdirectories, named "heads" and "tags" respectively. They do + exactly what their names imply: they contain references to any number + of different "heads" of development (aka "branches"), and to any + "tags" that you have created to name specific versions of your + repository. + + One note: the special "master" head is the default branch, which is + why the .git/HEAD file was created as a symlink to it even if it + doesn't yet exist. Bascially, the HEAD link is supposed to always + point to the branch you are working on right now, and you always + start out expecting to work on the "master" branch. + + However, this is only a convention, and you can name your branches + anything you want, and don't have to ever even _have_ a "master" + branch. A number of the git tools will assume that .git/HEAD is + valid, though. + + [ Implementation note: an "object" is identified by its 160-bit SHA1 + hash, aka "name", and a reference to an object is always the 40-byte + hex representation of that SHA1 name. The files in the "refs" + subdirectory are expected to contain these hex references (usually + with a final '\n' at the end), and you should thus expect to see a + number of 41-byte files containing these references in this refs + subdirectories when you actually start populating your tree ] + +You have now created your first git archive. Of course, since it's +empty, that's not very useful, so let's start populating it with data. + + + Populating a git archive + ------------------------ + +We'll keep this simple and stupid, so we'll start off with populating a +few trivial files just to get a feel for it. + +Start off with just creating any random files that you want to maintain +in your git archive. We'll start off with a few bad examples, just to +get a feel for how this works: + + echo "Hello World" > a + echo "Silly example" > b + +you have now created two files in your working directory, but to +actually check in your hard work, you will have to go through two steps: + + - fill in the "cache" aka "index" file with the information about your + working directory state + + - commit that index file as an object. + +The first step is trivial: when you want to tell git about any changes +to your working directory, you use the "git-update-cache" program. That +program normally just takes a list of filenames you want to update, but +to avoid trivial mistakes, it refuses to add new entries to the cache +(or remove existing ones) unless you explicitly tell it that you're +adding a new entry with the "--add" flag (or removing an entry with the +"--remove") flag. + +So to populate the index with the two files you just created, you can do + + git-update-cache --add a b + +and you have now told git to track those two files. + +In fact, as you did that, if you now look into your object directory, +you'll notice that git will have added two ne wobjects to the object +store. If you did exactly the steps above, you should now be able to do + + ls .git/objects/??/* + +and see two files: + + .git/objects/55/7db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 + .git/objects/f2/4c74a2e500f5ee1332c86b94199f52b1d1d962 + +which correspond with the object with SHA1 names of 557db... and f24c7.. +respectively. + +If you want to, you can use "git-cat-file" to look at those objects, but +you'll have to use the object name, not the filename of the object: + + git-cat-file -t 557db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 + +where the "-t" tells git-cat-file to tell you what the "type" of the +object is. Git will tell you that you have a "blob" object (ie just a +regular file), and you can see the contents with + + git-cat-file "blob" 557db03de997c86a4a028e1ebd3a1ceb225be238 + +which will print out "Hello World". The object 557db... is nothing +more than the contents of your file "a". + +[ Digression: don't confuse that object with the file "a" itself. The +object is literally just those specific _contents_ of the file, and +however much you later change the contents in file "a", the object we +just looked at will never change. Objects are immutable. ] + +Anyway, as we mentioned previously, you normally never actually take a +look at the objects themselves, and typing long 40-character hex SHA1 +names is not something you'd normally want to do. The above digression +was just to show that "git-update-cache" did something magical, and +actually saved away the contents of your files into the git content +store. + +Updating the cache did something else too: it created a ".git/index" +file. This is the index that describes your current working tree, and +something you should be very aware of. Again, you normally never worry +about the index file itself, but you should be aware of the fact that +you have not actually really "checked in" your files into git so far, +you've only _told_ git about them. + +However, since git knows about them, you can how start using some of the +most basic git commands to manipulate the files or look at their status. + +In particular, let's not even check in the two files into git yet, we'll +start off by adding another line to "a" first: + + echo "It's a new day for git" >> a + +and you can now, since you told git about the previous state of "a", ask +git what has changed in the tree compared to your old index, using the +"git-diff-files" command: + + git-diff-files + +oops. That wasn't very readable. It just spit out its own internal +version of a "diff", but that internal version really just tells you +that it has noticed that "a" has been modified, and that the old object +contents it had have been replaced with something else. + +To make it readable, we can tell git-diff-files to output the +differences as a patch, using the "-p" flag: + + git-diff-files -p + +which will spit out + + diff --git a/a b/a + --- a/a + +++ b/a + @@ -1 +1,2 @@ + Hello World + +It's a new day for git + +ie the diff of the change we caused by adding another line to "a". + +In other words, git-diff-files always shows us the difference between +what is recorded in the index, and what is currently in the working +tree. That's very useful. + + + Committing git state + -------------------- + +Now, we want to go to the next stage in git, which is to take the files +that git knows about in the index, and commit them as a real tree. We do +that in two phases: creating a "tree" object, and committing that "tree" +object as a "commit" object together with an explanation of what the +tree was all about, along with information of how we came to that state. + +Creating a tree object is trivial, and is done with "git-write-tree". +There are no options or other input: git-write-tree will take the +current index state, and write an object that describes that whole +index. In other words, we're now tying together all the different +filenames with their contents (and their permissions), and we're +creating the equivalent of a git "directory" object: + + git-write-tree + +and this will just output the name of the resulting tree, in this case +(if you have does exactly as I've described) it should be + + 3ede4ed7e895432c0a247f09d71a76db53bd0fa4 + +which is another incomprehensible object name. Again, if you want to, +you can use "git-cat-file -t 3ede4.." to see that this time the object +is not a "blob" object, but a "tree" object (you can also use +git-cat-file to actually output the raw object contents, but you'll see +mainly a binary mess, so that's less interesting). + +However - normally you'd never use "git-write-tree" on its own, because +normally you always commit a tree into a commit object using the +"git-commit-tree" command. In fact, it's easier to not actually use +git-write-tree on its own at all, but to just pass its result in as an +argument to "git-commit-tree". + +"git-commit-tree" normally takes several arguments - it wants to know +what the _parent_ of a commit was, but since this is the first commit +ever in this new archive, and it has no parents, we only need to pass in +the tree ID. However, git-commit-tree also wants to get a commit message +on its standard input, and it will write out the resulting ID for the +commit to its standard output. + +And this is where we start using the .git/HEAD file. The HEAD file is +supposed to contain the reference to the top-of-tree, and since that's +exactly what git-commit-tree spits out, we can do this all with a simple +shell pipeline: + + echo "Initial commit" | git-commit-tree $(git-write-tree) > .git/HEAD + +which will say: + + Committing initial tree 3ede4ed7e895432c0a247f09d71a76db53bd0fa4 + +just to warn you about the fact that it created a totally new commit +that is not related to anything else. Normally you do this only _once_ +for a project ever, and all later commits will be parented on top of an +earlier commit, and you'll never see this "Committing initial tree" +message ever again. + + + Making a change + --------------- + +Remember how we did the "git-update-cache" on file "a" and then we +changed "a" afterwards, and could compare the new state of "a" with the +state we saved in the index file? + +Further, remember how I said that "git-write-tree" writes the contents +of the _index_ file to the tree, and thus what we just committed was in +fact the _original_ contents of the file "a", not the new ones. We did +that on purpose, to show the difference between the index state, and the +state in the working directory, and how they don't have to match, even +when we commit things. + +As before, if we do "git-diff-files -p" in our git-tutorial project, +we'll still see the same difference we saw last time: the index file +hasn't changed by the act of committing anything. However, now that we +have committed something, we can also learn to use a new command: +"git-diff-cache". + +Unlike "git-diff-files", which showed the difference between the index +file and the working directory, "git-diff-cache" shows the differences +between a committed _tree_ and the index file. In other words, +git-diff-cache wants a tree to be diffed against, and before we did the +commit, we couldn't do that, because we didn't have anything to diff +against. + +But now we can do + + git-diff-cache -p HEAD + +(where "-p" has the same meaning as it did in git-diff-files), and it +will show us the same difference, but for a totally different reason. +Now we're not comparing against the index file, we're comparing against +the tree we just wrote. It just so happens that those two are obviously +the same. + +"git-diff-cache" also has a specific flag "--cached", which is used to +tell it to show the differences purely with the index file, and ignore +the current working directory state entirely. Since we just wrote the +index file to HEAD, doing "git-diff-cache --cached -p HEAD" should thus +return an empty set of differences, and that's exactly what it does. + +However, our next step is to commit the _change_ we did, and again, to +understand what's going on, keep in mind the difference between "workign +directory contents", "index file" and "committed tree". We have changes +in the working directory that we want to commit, and we always have to +work through the index file, so the first thing we need to do is to +update the index cache: + + git-update-cache a + +(note how we didn't need the "--add" flag this time, since git knew +about the file already). + +Note what happens to the different git-diff-xxx versions here. After +we've updated "a" in the index, "git-diff-files -p" now shows no +differences, but "git-diff-cache -p HEAD" still _does_ show that the +current state is different from the state we committed. In fact, now +"git-diff-cache" shows the same difference whether we use the "--cached" +flag or not, since now the index is coherent with the working directory. + +Now, since we've updated "a" in the index, we can commit the new +version. We could do it by writing the tree by hand, and committing the +tree (this time we'd have to use the "-p HEAD" flag to tell commit that +the HEAD was the _parent_ fo the new commit, and that this wasn't an +initial commit any more), but the fact is, git has a simple helper +script for doing all of the non-initial commits that does all of this +for you, and starts up an editor to let you write your commit message +yourself, so let's just use that: + + git-commit-script + +Write whatever message you want, and all the lines that start with '#' +will be pruned out, and the rest will be used as the commit message for +the change. If you decide you don't want to commit anything after all at +this point (you can continue to edit things and update the cache), you +can just leave an empty message. Otherwise git-commit-script will commit +the change for you. + +(Btw, current versions of git will consider the change in question to be +so big that it's considered a whole new file, since the diff is actually +bigger than the file. So the helpful comments that git-commit-script +tells you for this example will say that you deleted and re-created the +file "a". For a less contrieved example, these things are usually more +obvious). + +You've now made your first real git commit. And if you're interested in +looking at what git-commit-script really does, feel free to investigate: +it's a few very simple shell scripts to generate the helpful (?) commit +message headers, and a few one-liners that actually do the commit itself. + + + Checking it out + --------------- + +While creating changes is useful, it's even more useful if you can tell +later what changed. The most useful command for this is another of the +"diff" family, namely "git-diff-tree". + +git-diff-tree can be given two arbitrary trees, and it will tell you the +differences between them. Perhaps even more commonly, though, you can +give it just a single commit object, and it will figure out the parent +of that commit itself, and show the difference directly. Thus, to get +the same diff that we've already seen several times, we can now do + + git-diff-tree -p HEAD + +(again, "-p" means to show the difference as a human-readable patch), +and it will show what the last commit (in HEAD) actually changed. + +More interestingly, you can also give git-diff-tree the "-v" flag, which +tells it to also show the commit message and author and date of the +commit, and you can tell it to show a whole series of diffs. +Alternatively, you can tell it to be "silent", and not show the diffs at +all, but just show the actual commit message. + +In fact, together with the "git-rev-list" program (which generates a +list of revisions), git-diff-tree ends up being a veritable fount of +changes. A trivial (but very useful) script called "git-whatchanged" is +included with git which does exactly this, and shows a log of recent +activity. + +To see the whole history of our pitiful little git-tutorial project, we +can do + + git-whatchanged -p --root HEAD + +(the "--root" flag is a flag to git-diff-tree to tell it to show the +initial aka "root" commit as a diff too), and you will see exactly what +has changed in the repository over its short history. + +With that, you should now be having some incling of what git does, and +can explore on your own. + +[ to be continued.. cvs2git, tagging versions, branches, merging.. ] |