diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/user-manual.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/user-manual.txt | 476 |
1 files changed, 239 insertions, 237 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt index 988c13ff4c..0170a2346c 100644 --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ ______________________________________________ Git is a fast distributed revision control system. This manual is designed to be readable by someone with basic UNIX -command-line skills, but no previous knowledge of git. +command-line skills, but no previous knowledge of Git. <<repositories-and-branches>> and <<exploring-git-history>> explain how to fetch and study a project using git--read these chapters to learn how @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Further chapters cover more specialized topics. Comprehensive reference documentation is available through the man pages, or linkgit:git-help[1] command. For example, for the command -"git clone <repo>", you can either use: +`git clone <repo>`, you can either use: ------------------------------------------------ $ man git-clone @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ $ git help clone With the latter, you can use the manual viewer of your choice; see linkgit:git-help[1] for more information. -See also <<git-quick-start>> for a brief overview of git commands, +See also <<git-quick-start>> for a brief overview of Git commands, without any explanation. Finally, see <<todo>> for ways that you can help make this manual more @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ Repositories and Branches ========================= [[how-to-get-a-git-repository]] -How to get a git repository +How to get a Git repository --------------------------- -It will be useful to have a git repository to experiment with as you +It will be useful to have a Git repository to experiment with as you read this manual. The best way to get one is by using the linkgit:git-clone[1] command to @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ download a copy of an existing repository. If you don't already have a project in mind, here are some interesting examples: ------------------------------------------------ - # git itself (approx. 10MB download): + # Git itself (approx. 10MB download): $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git # the Linux kernel (approx. 150MB download): $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git @@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ $ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git The initial clone may be time-consuming for a large project, but you will only need to clone once. -The clone command creates a new directory named after the project ("git" -or "linux-2.6" in the examples above). After you cd into this +The clone command creates a new directory named after the project (`git` +or `linux-2.6` in the examples above). After you cd into this directory, you will see that it contains a copy of the project files, called the <<def_working_tree,working tree>>, together with a special -top-level directory named ".git", which contains all the information +top-level directory named `.git`, which contains all the information about the history of the project. [[how-to-check-out]] @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ How to check out a different version of a project Git is best thought of as a tool for storing the history of a collection of files. It stores the history as a compressed collection of -interrelated snapshots of the project's contents. In git each such +interrelated snapshots of the project's contents. In Git each such version is called a <<def_commit,commit>>. Those snapshots aren't necessarily all arranged in a single line from @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ oldest to newest; instead, work may simultaneously proceed along parallel lines of development, called <<def_branch,branches>>, which may merge and diverge. -A single git repository can track development on multiple branches. It +A single Git repository can track development on multiple branches. It does this by keeping a list of <<def_head,heads>> which reference the latest commit on each branch; the linkgit:git-branch[1] command shows you the list of branch heads: @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ As you can see, a commit shows who made the latest change, what they did, and why. Every commit has a 40-hexdigit id, sometimes called the "object name" or the -"SHA-1 id", shown on the first line of the "git show" output. You can usually +"SHA-1 id", shown on the first line of the `git show` output. You can usually refer to a commit by a shorter name, such as a tag or a branch name, but this longer name can also be useful. Most importantly, it is a globally unique name for this commit: so if you tell somebody else the object name (for @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ has that commit at all). Since the object name is computed as a hash over the contents of the commit, you are guaranteed that the commit can never change without its name also changing. -In fact, in <<git-concepts>> we shall see that everything stored in git +In fact, in <<git-concepts>> we shall see that everything stored in Git history, including file data and directory contents, is stored in an object with a name that is a hash of its contents. @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ parent commit which shows what happened before this commit. Following the chain of parents will eventually take you back to the beginning of the project. -However, the commits do not form a simple list; git allows lines of +However, the commits do not form a simple list; Git allows lines of development to diverge and then reconverge, and the point where two lines of development reconverge is called a "merge". The commit representing a merge can therefore have more than one parent, with @@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ each parent representing the most recent commit on one of the lines of development leading to that point. The best way to see how this works is using the linkgit:gitk[1] -command; running gitk now on a git repository and looking for merge -commits will help understand how the git organizes history. +command; running gitk now on a Git repository and looking for merge +commits will help understand how the Git organizes history. In the following, we say that commit X is "reachable" from commit Y if commit X is an ancestor of commit Y. Equivalently, you could say @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ leading from commit Y to commit X. Understanding history: History diagrams ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -We will sometimes represent git history using diagrams like the one +We will sometimes represent Git history using diagrams like the one below. Commits are shown as "o", and the links between them with lines drawn with - / and \. Time goes left to right: @@ -268,35 +268,35 @@ Manipulating branches Creating, deleting, and modifying branches is quick and easy; here's a summary of the commands: -git branch:: +`git branch`:: list all branches -git branch <branch>:: - create a new branch named <branch>, referencing the same +`git branch <branch>`:: + create a new branch named `<branch>`, referencing the same point in history as the current branch -git branch <branch> <start-point>:: - create a new branch named <branch>, referencing - <start-point>, which may be specified any way you like, +`git branch <branch> <start-point>`:: + create a new branch named `<branch>`, referencing + `<start-point>`, which may be specified any way you like, including using a branch name or a tag name -git branch -d <branch>:: - delete the branch <branch>; if the branch you are deleting +`git branch -d <branch>`:: + delete the branch `<branch>`; if the branch you are deleting points to a commit which is not reachable from the current branch, this command will fail with a warning. -git branch -D <branch>:: +`git branch -D <branch>`:: even if the branch points to a commit not reachable from the current branch, you may know that that commit is still reachable from some other branch or tag. In that - case it is safe to use this command to force git to delete + case it is safe to use this command to force Git to delete the branch. -git checkout <branch>:: - make the current branch <branch>, updating the working - directory to reflect the version referenced by <branch> -git checkout -b <new> <start-point>:: - create a new branch <new> referencing <start-point>, and +`git checkout <branch>`:: + make the current branch `<branch>`, updating the working + directory to reflect the version referenced by `<branch>` +`git checkout -b <new> <start-point>`:: + create a new branch `<new>` referencing `<start-point>`, and check it out. The special symbol "HEAD" can always be used to refer to the current -branch. In fact, git uses a file named "HEAD" in the .git directory to -remember which branch is current: +branch. In fact, Git uses a file named `HEAD` in the `.git` directory +to remember which branch is current: ------------------------------------------------ $ cat .git/HEAD @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ of the HEAD in the repository that you cloned from. That repository may also have had other branches, though, and your local repository keeps branches which track each of those remote branches, called remote-tracking branches, which you -can view using the "-r" option to linkgit:git-branch[1]: +can view using the `-r` option to linkgit:git-branch[1]: ------------------------------------------------ $ git branch -r @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ In this example, "origin" is called a remote repository, or "remote" for short. The branches of this repository are called "remote branches" from our point of view. The remote-tracking branches listed above were created based on the remote branches at clone time and will -be updated by "git fetch" (hence "git pull") and "git push". See +be updated by `git fetch` (hence `git pull`) and `git push`. See <<Updating-a-repository-With-git-fetch>> for details. You might want to build on one of these remote-tracking branches @@ -374,10 +374,10 @@ on a branch of your own, just as you would for a tag: $ git checkout -b my-todo-copy origin/todo ------------------------------------------------ -You can also check out "origin/todo" directly to examine it or +You can also check out `origin/todo` directly to examine it or write a one-off patch. See <<detached-head,detached head>>. -Note that the name "origin" is just the name that git uses by default +Note that the name "origin" is just the name that Git uses by default to refer to the repository that you cloned from. [[how-git-stores-references]] @@ -386,17 +386,17 @@ Naming branches, tags, and other references Branches, remote-tracking branches, and tags are all references to commits. All references are named with a slash-separated path name -starting with "refs"; the names we've been using so far are actually +starting with `refs`; the names we've been using so far are actually shorthand: - - The branch "test" is short for "refs/heads/test". - - The tag "v2.6.18" is short for "refs/tags/v2.6.18". - - "origin/master" is short for "refs/remotes/origin/master". + - The branch `test` is short for `refs/heads/test`. + - The tag `v2.6.18` is short for `refs/tags/v2.6.18`. + - `origin/master` is short for `refs/remotes/origin/master`. The full name is occasionally useful if, for example, there ever exists a tag and a branch with the same name. -(Newly created refs are actually stored in the .git/refs directory, +(Newly created refs are actually stored in the `.git/refs` directory, under the path given by their name. However, for efficiency reasons they may also be packed together in a single file; see linkgit:git-pack-refs[1]). @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ As another useful shortcut, the "HEAD" of a repository can be referred to just using the name of that repository. So, for example, "origin" is usually a shortcut for the HEAD branch in the repository "origin". -For the complete list of paths which git checks for references, and +For the complete list of paths which Git checks for references, and the order it uses to decide which to choose when there are multiple references with the same shorthand name, see the "SPECIFYING REVISIONS" section of linkgit:gitrevisions[7]. @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ Eventually the developer cloned from will do additional work in her repository, creating new commits and advancing the branches to point at the new commits. -The command "git fetch", with no arguments, will update all of the +The command `git fetch`, with no arguments, will update all of the remote-tracking branches to the latest version found in her repository. It will not touch any of your own branches--not even the "master" branch that was created for you on clone. @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ $ git fetch linux-nfs ------------------------------------------------- New remote-tracking branches will be stored under the shorthand name -that you gave "git remote add", in this case linux-nfs: +that you gave `git remote add`, in this case `linux-nfs`: ------------------------------------------------- $ git branch -r @@ -446,10 +446,10 @@ linux-nfs/master origin/master ------------------------------------------------- -If you run "git fetch <remote>" later, the remote-tracking branches for the -named <remote> will be updated. +If you run `git fetch <remote>` later, the remote-tracking branches +for the named `<remote>` will be updated. -If you examine the file .git/config, you will see that git has added +If you examine the file `.git/config`, you will see that Git has added a new stanza: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -461,13 +461,13 @@ $ cat .git/config ... ------------------------------------------------- -This is what causes git to track the remote's branches; you may modify -or delete these configuration options by editing .git/config with a +This is what causes Git to track the remote's branches; you may modify +or delete these configuration options by editing `.git/config` with a text editor. (See the "CONFIGURATION FILE" section of linkgit:git-config[1] for details.) [[exploring-git-history]] -Exploring git history +Exploring Git history ===================== Git is best thought of as a tool for storing the history of a @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ Bisecting: 3537 revisions left to test after this [65934a9a028b88e83e2b0f8b36618fe503349f8e] BLOCK: Make USB storage depend on SCSI rather than selecting it [try #6] ------------------------------------------------- -If you run "git branch" at this point, you'll see that git has +If you run `git branch` at this point, you'll see that Git has temporarily moved you in "(no branch)". HEAD is now detached from any branch and points directly to a commit (with commit id 65934...) that is reachable from "master" but not from v2.6.18. Compile and test it, @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ Bisecting: 1769 revisions left to test after this [7eff82c8b1511017ae605f0c99ac275a7e21b867] i2c-core: Drop useless bitmaskings ------------------------------------------------- -checks out an older version. Continue like this, telling git at each +checks out an older version. Continue like this, telling Git at each stage whether the version it gives you is good or bad, and notice that the number of revisions left to test is cut approximately in half each time. @@ -545,24 +545,24 @@ id, and check it out with: $ git reset --hard fb47ddb2db... ------------------------------------------------- -then test, run "bisect good" or "bisect bad" as appropriate, and +then test, run `bisect good` or `bisect bad` as appropriate, and continue. -Instead of "git bisect visualize" and then "git reset --hard -fb47ddb2db...", you might just want to tell git that you want to skip +Instead of `git bisect visualize` and then `git reset --hard +fb47ddb2db...`, you might just want to tell Git that you want to skip the current commit: ------------------------------------------------- $ git bisect skip ------------------------------------------------- -In this case, though, git may not eventually be able to tell the first +In this case, though, Git may not eventually be able to tell the first bad one between some first skipped commits and a later bad commit. There are also ways to automate the bisecting process if you have a test script that can tell a good from a bad commit. See -linkgit:git-bisect[1] for more information about this and other "git -bisect" features. +linkgit:git-bisect[1] for more information about this and other `git +bisect` features. [[naming-commits]] Naming commits @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ $ git show HEAD~4 # the great-great-grandparent ------------------------------------------------- Recall that merge commits may have more than one parent; by default, -^ and ~ follow the first parent listed in the commit, but you can +`^` and `~` follow the first parent listed in the commit, but you can also choose: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ running $ git tag stable-1 1b2e1d63ff ------------------------------------------------- -You can use stable-1 to refer to the commit 1b2e1d63ff. +You can use `stable-1` to refer to the commit 1b2e1d63ff. This creates a "lightweight" tag. If you would also like to include a comment with the tag, and possibly sign it cryptographically, then you @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ $ git log -S'foo()' # commits which add or remove any file data ------------------------------------------------- And of course you can combine all of these; the following finds -commits since v2.5 which touch the Makefile or any file under fs: +commits since v2.5 which touch the `Makefile` or any file under `fs`: ------------------------------------------------- $ git log v2.5.. Makefile fs/ @@ -681,11 +681,11 @@ You can also ask git log to show patches: $ git log -p ------------------------------------------------- -See the "--pretty" option in the linkgit:git-log[1] man page for more +See the `--pretty` option in the linkgit:git-log[1] man page for more display options. Note that git log starts with the most recent commit and works -backwards through the parents; however, since git history can contain +backwards through the parents; however, since Git history can contain multiple independent lines of development, the particular order that commits are listed in may be somewhat arbitrary. @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ $ git show v2.5:fs/locks.c ------------------------------------------------- Before the colon may be anything that names a commit, and after it -may be any path to a file tracked by git. +may be any path to a file tracked by Git. [[history-examples]] Examples @@ -742,8 +742,8 @@ Examples Counting the number of commits on a branch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -Suppose you want to know how many commits you've made on "mybranch" -since it diverged from "origin": +Suppose you want to know how many commits you've made on `mybranch` +since it diverged from `origin`: ------------------------------------------------- $ git log --pretty=oneline origin..mybranch | wc -l @@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ $ git rev-list master e05db0fd4f31dde7005f075a84f96b360d05984b ------------------------------------------------- -Or you could recall that the ... operator selects all commits +Or you could recall that the `...` operator selects all commits contained reachable from either one reference or the other but not both; so @@ -880,7 +880,7 @@ Showing commits unique to a given branch ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose you would like to see all the commits reachable from the branch -head named "master" but not from any other head in your repository. +head named `master` but not from any other head in your repository. We can list all the heads in this repository with linkgit:git-show-ref[1]: @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ a07157ac624b2524a059a3414e99f6f44bebc1e7 refs/heads/master 1e87486ae06626c2f31eaa63d26fc0fd646c8af2 refs/heads/tutorial-fixes ------------------------------------------------- -We can get just the branch-head names, and remove "master", with +We can get just the branch-head names, and remove `master`, with the help of the standard utilities cut and grep: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ is preceded by `project/`. The output file format is inferred from the output file extension if possible, see linkgit:git-archive[1] for details. -Versions of Git older than 1.7.7 don't know about the 'tar.gz' format, +Versions of Git older than 1.7.7 don't know about the `tar.gz` format, you'll need to use gzip explicitly: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -993,11 +993,11 @@ student. The linkgit:git-log[1], linkgit:git-diff-tree[1], and linkgit:git-hash-object[1] man pages may prove helpful. [[Developing-With-git]] -Developing with git +Developing with Git =================== [[telling-git-your-name]] -Telling git your name +Telling Git your name --------------------- Before creating any commits, you should introduce yourself to Git. @@ -1052,17 +1052,17 @@ Creating a new commit takes three steps: 1. Making some changes to the working directory using your favorite editor. - 2. Telling git about your changes. - 3. Creating the commit using the content you told git about + 2. Telling Git about your changes. + 3. Creating the commit using the content you told Git about in step 2. In practice, you can interleave and repeat steps 1 and 2 as many times as you want: in order to keep track of what you want committed -at step 3, git maintains a snapshot of the tree's contents in a +at step 3, Git maintains a snapshot of the tree's contents in a special staging area called "the index." At the beginning, the content of the index will be identical to -that of the HEAD. The command "git diff --cached", which shows +that of the HEAD. The command `git diff --cached`, which shows the difference between the HEAD and the index, should therefore produce no output at that point. @@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@ $ git diff shows the difference between the working tree and the index file. -Note that "git add" always adds just the current contents of a file +Note that `git add` always adds just the current contents of a file to the index; further changes to the same file will be ignored unless you run `git add` on the file again. @@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ When you're ready, just run $ git commit ------------------------------------------------- -and git will prompt you for a commit message and then create the new +and Git will prompt you for a commit message and then create the new commit. Check to make sure it looks like what you expected with ------------------------------------------------- @@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ with a single short (less than 50 character) line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more thorough description. The text up to the first blank line in a commit message is treated as the commit title, and that title is used -throughout git. For example, linkgit:git-format-patch[1] turns a +throughout Git. For example, linkgit:git-format-patch[1] turns a commit into email, and it uses the title on the Subject line and the rest of the commit in the body. @@ -1164,16 +1164,17 @@ rest of the commit in the body. Ignoring files -------------- -A project will often generate files that you do 'not' want to track with git. +A project will often generate files that you do 'not' want to track with Git. This typically includes files generated by a build process or temporary -backup files made by your editor. Of course, 'not' tracking files with git +backup files made by your editor. Of course, 'not' tracking files with Git is just a matter of 'not' calling `git add` on them. But it quickly becomes annoying to have these untracked files lying around; e.g. they make `git add .` practically useless, and they keep showing up in the output of `git status`. -You can tell git to ignore certain files by creating a file called .gitignore -in the top level of your working directory, with contents such as: +You can tell Git to ignore certain files by creating a file called +`.gitignore` in the top level of your working directory, with contents +such as: ------------------------------------------------- # Lines starting with '#' are considered comments. @@ -1197,10 +1198,10 @@ for other users who clone your repository. If you wish the exclude patterns to affect only certain repositories (instead of every repository for a given project), you may instead put -them in a file in your repository named .git/info/exclude, or in any file -specified by the `core.excludesfile` configuration variable. Some git -commands can also take exclude patterns directly on the command line. -See linkgit:gitignore[5] for the details. +them in a file in your repository named `.git/info/exclude`, or in any +file specified by the `core.excludesfile` configuration variable. +Some Git commands can also take exclude patterns directly on the +command line. See linkgit:gitignore[5] for the details. [[how-to-merge]] How to merge @@ -1213,10 +1214,10 @@ linkgit:git-merge[1]: $ git merge branchname ------------------------------------------------- -merges the development in the branch "branchname" into the current +merges the development in the branch `branchname` into the current branch. -A merge is made by combining the changes made in "branchname" and the +A merge is made by combining the changes made in `branchname` and the changes made up to the latest commit in your current branch since their histories forked. The work tree is overwritten by the result of the merge when this combining is done cleanly, or overwritten by a @@ -1244,7 +1245,7 @@ Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. Conflict markers are left in the problematic files, and after you resolve the conflicts manually, you can update the index -with the contents and run git commit, as you normally would when +with the contents and run Git commit, as you normally would when creating a new file. If you examine the resulting commit using gitk, you will see that it @@ -1255,7 +1256,7 @@ one to the top of the other branch. Resolving a merge ----------------- -When a merge isn't resolved automatically, git leaves the index and +When a merge isn't resolved automatically, Git leaves the index and the working tree in a special state that gives you all the information you need to help resolve the merge. @@ -1291,14 +1292,14 @@ some information about the merge. Normally you can just use this default message unchanged, but you may add additional commentary of your own if desired. -The above is all you need to know to resolve a simple merge. But git +The above is all you need to know to resolve a simple merge. But Git also provides more information to help resolve conflicts: [[conflict-resolution]] Getting conflict-resolution help during a merge ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -All of the changes that git was able to merge automatically are +All of the changes that Git was able to merge automatically are already added to the index file, so linkgit:git-diff[1] shows only the conflicts. It uses an unusual syntax: @@ -1338,7 +1339,7 @@ that part is not conflicting and is not shown. Same for stage 3). The diff above shows the differences between the working-tree version of file.txt and the stage 2 and stage 3 versions. So instead of preceding -each line by a single "+" or "-", it now uses two columns: the first +each line by a single `+` or `-`, it now uses two columns: the first column is used for differences between the first parent and the working directory copy, and the second for differences between the second parent and the working directory copy. (See the "COMBINED DIFF FORMAT" section @@ -1430,7 +1431,7 @@ parents, one pointing at each of the two lines of development that were merged. However, if the current branch is a descendant of the other--so every -commit present in the one is already contained in the other--then git +commit present in the one is already contained in the other--then Git just performs a "fast-forward"; the head of the current branch is moved forward to point at the head of the merged-in branch, without any new commits being created. @@ -1456,7 +1457,7 @@ fundamentally different ways to fix the problem: 2. You can go back and modify the old commit. You should never do this if you have already made the history public; - git does not normally expect the "history" of a project to + Git does not normally expect the "history" of a project to change, and cannot correctly perform repeated merges from a branch that has had its history changed. @@ -1481,7 +1482,7 @@ You can also revert an earlier change, for example, the next-to-last: $ git revert HEAD^ ------------------------------------------------- -In this case git will attempt to undo the old change while leaving +In this case Git will attempt to undo the old change while leaving intact any changes made since then. If more recent changes overlap with the changes to be reverted, then you will be asked to fix conflicts manually, just as in the case of <<resolving-a-merge, @@ -1580,7 +1581,7 @@ Ensuring good performance On large repositories, Git depends on compression to keep the history information from taking up too much space on disk or in memory. Some -git commands may automatically run linkgit:git-gc[1], so you don't +Git commands may automatically run linkgit:git-gc[1], so you don't have to worry about running it manually. However, compressing a large repository may take a while, so you may want to call `gc` explicitly to avoid automatic compression kicking in when it is not convenient. @@ -1613,7 +1614,7 @@ dangling tree b24c2473f1fd3d91352a624795be026d64c8841f You will see informational messages on dangling objects. They are objects that still exist in the repository but are no longer referenced by any of -your branches, and can (and will) be removed after a while with "gc". +your branches, and can (and will) be removed after a while with `gc`. You can run `git fsck --no-dangling` to suppress these messages, and still view real errors. @@ -1625,11 +1626,11 @@ Recovering lost changes Reflogs ^^^^^^^ -Say you modify a branch with +linkgit:git-reset[1] \--hard+, and then -realize that the branch was the only reference you had to that point in -history. +Say you modify a branch with <<fixing-mistakes,`git reset --hard`>>, +and then realize that the branch was the only reference you had to +that point in history. -Fortunately, git also keeps a log, called a "reflog", of all the +Fortunately, Git also keeps a log, called a "reflog", of all the previous values of each branch. So in this case you can still find the old history using, for example, @@ -1638,8 +1639,8 @@ $ git log master@{1} ------------------------------------------------- This lists the commits reachable from the previous version of the -"master" branch head. This syntax can be used with any git command -that accepts a commit, not just with git log. Some other examples: +`master` branch head. This syntax can be used with any Git command +that accepts a commit, not just with `git log`. Some other examples: ------------------------------------------------- $ git show master@{2} # See where the branch pointed 2, @@ -1664,7 +1665,7 @@ pruned. See linkgit:git-reflog[1] and linkgit:git-gc[1] to learn how to control this pruning, and see the "SPECIFYING REVISIONS" section of linkgit:gitrevisions[7] for details. -Note that the reflog history is very different from normal git history. +Note that the reflog history is very different from normal Git history. While normal history is shared by every repository that works on the same project, the reflog history is not shared: it tells you only about how the branches in your local repository have changed over time. @@ -1743,8 +1744,8 @@ one step: $ git pull origin master ------------------------------------------------- -In fact, if you have "master" checked out, then this branch has been -configured by "git clone" to get changes from the HEAD branch of the +In fact, if you have `master` checked out, then this branch has been +configured by `git clone` to get changes from the HEAD branch of the origin repository. So often you can accomplish the above with just a simple @@ -1759,11 +1760,11 @@ the current branch. More generally, a branch that is created from a remote-tracking branch will pull by default from that branch. See the descriptions of the -branch.<name>.remote and branch.<name>.merge options in +`branch.<name>.remote` and `branch.<name>.merge` options in linkgit:git-config[1], and the discussion of the `--track` option in linkgit:git-checkout[1], to learn how to control these defaults. -In addition to saving you keystrokes, "git pull" also helps you by +In addition to saving you keystrokes, `git pull` also helps you by producing a default commit message documenting the branch and repository that you pulled from. @@ -1771,7 +1772,7 @@ repository that you pulled from. <<fast-forwards,fast-forward>>; instead, your branch will just be updated to point to the latest commit from the upstream branch.) -The `git pull` command can also be given "." as the "remote" repository, +The `git pull` command can also be given `.` as the "remote" repository, in which case it just merges in a branch from the current repository; so the commands @@ -1796,7 +1797,7 @@ $ git format-patch origin ------------------------------------------------- will produce a numbered series of files in the current directory, one -for each patch in the current branch but not in origin/HEAD. +for each patch in the current branch but not in `origin/HEAD`. `git format-patch` can include an initial "cover letter". You can insert commentary on individual patches after the three dash line which @@ -1818,7 +1819,7 @@ Importing patches to a project Git also provides a tool called linkgit:git-am[1] (am stands for "apply mailbox"), for importing such an emailed series of patches. Just save all of the patch-containing messages, in order, into a -single mailbox file, say "patches.mbox", then run +single mailbox file, say `patches.mbox`, then run ------------------------------------------------- $ git am -3 patches.mbox @@ -1826,8 +1827,8 @@ $ git am -3 patches.mbox Git will apply each patch in order; if any conflicts are found, it will stop, and you can fix the conflicts as described in -"<<resolving-a-merge,Resolving a merge>>". (The "-3" option tells -git to perform a merge; if you would prefer it just to abort and +"<<resolving-a-merge,Resolving a merge>>". (The `-3` option tells +Git to perform a merge; if you would prefer it just to abort and leave your tree and index untouched, you may omit that option.) Once the index is updated with the results of the conflict @@ -1837,7 +1838,7 @@ resolution, instead of creating a new commit, just run $ git am --resolved ------------------------------------------------- -and git will create the commit for you and continue applying the +and Git will create the commit for you and continue applying the remaining patches from the mailbox. The final result will be a series of commits, one for each patch in @@ -1845,7 +1846,7 @@ the original mailbox, with authorship and commit log message each taken from the message containing each patch. [[public-repositories]] -Public git repositories +Public Git repositories ----------------------- Another way to submit changes to a project is to tell the maintainer @@ -1902,7 +1903,7 @@ We explain how to do this in the following sections. Setting up a public repository ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -Assume your personal repository is in the directory ~/proj. We +Assume your personal repository is in the directory `~/proj`. We first create a new clone of the repository and tell `git daemon` that it is meant to be public: @@ -1912,28 +1913,28 @@ $ touch proj.git/git-daemon-export-ok ------------------------------------------------- The resulting directory proj.git contains a "bare" git repository--it is -just the contents of the ".git" directory, without any files checked out +just the contents of the `.git` directory, without any files checked out around it. -Next, copy proj.git to the server where you plan to host the +Next, copy `proj.git` to the server where you plan to host the public repository. You can use scp, rsync, or whatever is most convenient. [[exporting-via-git]] -Exporting a git repository via the git protocol +Exporting a Git repository via the Git protocol ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is the preferred method. If someone else administers the server, they should tell you what -directory to put the repository in, and what git:// URL it will appear -at. You can then skip to the section +directory to put the repository in, and what `git://` URL it will +appear at. You can then skip to the section "<<pushing-changes-to-a-public-repository,Pushing changes to a public repository>>", below. Otherwise, all you need to do is start linkgit:git-daemon[1]; it will listen on port 9418. By default, it will allow access to any directory -that looks like a git directory and contains the magic file +that looks like a Git directory and contains the magic file git-daemon-export-ok. Passing some directory paths as `git daemon` arguments will further restrict the exports to those paths. @@ -1945,10 +1946,10 @@ examples section.) Exporting a git repository via HTTP ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -The git protocol gives better performance and reliability, but on a +The Git protocol gives better performance and reliability, but on a host with a web server set up, HTTP exports may be simpler to set up. -All you need to do is place the newly created bare git repository in +All you need to do is place the newly created bare Git repository in a directory that is exported by the web server, and make some adjustments to give web clients some extra information they need: @@ -1962,7 +1963,7 @@ $ mv hooks/post-update.sample hooks/post-update (For an explanation of the last two lines, see linkgit:git-update-server-info[1] and linkgit:githooks[5].) -Advertise the URL of proj.git. Anybody else should then be able to +Advertise the URL of `proj.git`. Anybody else should then be able to clone or pull from that URL, for example with a command line like: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -1985,8 +1986,8 @@ access, which you will need to update the public repository with the latest changes created in your private repository. The simplest way to do this is using linkgit:git-push[1] and ssh; to -update the remote branch named "master" with the latest state of your -branch named "master", run +update the remote branch named `master` with the latest state of your +branch named `master`, run ------------------------------------------------- $ git push ssh://yourserver.com/~you/proj.git master:master @@ -2002,7 +2003,7 @@ As with `git fetch`, `git push` will complain if this does not result in a <<fast-forwards,fast-forward>>; see the following section for details on handling this case. -Note that the target of a "push" is normally a +Note that the target of a `push` is normally a <<def_bare_repository,bare>> repository. You can also push to a repository that has a checked-out working tree, but a push to update the currently checked-out branch is denied by default to prevent confusion. @@ -2030,9 +2031,9 @@ which lets you do the same push with just $ git push public-repo master ------------------------------------------------- -See the explanations of the remote.<name>.url, branch.<name>.remote, -and remote.<name>.push options in linkgit:git-config[1] for -details. +See the explanations of the `remote.<name>.url`, +`branch.<name>.remote`, and `remote.<name>.push` options in +linkgit:git-config[1] for details. [[forcing-push]] What to do when a push fails @@ -2097,9 +2098,9 @@ all push to and pull from a single shared repository. See linkgit:gitcvs-migration[7] for instructions on how to set this up. -However, while there is nothing wrong with git's support for shared +However, while there is nothing wrong with Git's support for shared repositories, this mode of operation is not generally recommended, -simply because the mode of collaboration that git supports--by +simply because the mode of collaboration that Git supports--by exchanging patches and pulling from public repositories--has so many advantages over the central shared repository: @@ -2123,8 +2124,8 @@ Allowing web browsing of a repository ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The gitweb cgi script provides users an easy way to browse your -project's files and history without having to install git; see the file -gitweb/INSTALL in the git source tree for instructions on setting it up. +project's files and history without having to install Git; see the file +gitweb/INSTALL in the Git source tree for instructions on setting it up. [[sharing-development-examples]] Examples @@ -2134,7 +2135,7 @@ Examples Maintaining topic branches for a Linux subsystem maintainer ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -This describes how Tony Luck uses git in his role as maintainer of the +This describes how Tony Luck uses Git in his role as maintainer of the IA64 architecture for the Linux kernel. He uses two public branches: @@ -2167,7 +2168,7 @@ linkgit:git-fetch[1] to keep them up-to-date; see Now create the branches in which you are going to work; these start out at the current tip of origin/master branch, and should be set up (using -the --track option to linkgit:git-branch[1]) to merge changes in from +the `--track` option to linkgit:git-branch[1]) to merge changes in from Linus by default. ------------------------------------------------- @@ -2184,9 +2185,9 @@ $ git checkout release && git pull Important note! If you have any local changes in these branches, then this merge will create a commit object in the history (with no local -changes git will simply do a "fast-forward" merge). Many people dislike +changes Git will simply do a "fast-forward" merge). Many people dislike the "noise" that this creates in the Linux history, so you should avoid -doing this capriciously in the "release" branch, as these noisy commits +doing this capriciously in the `release` branch, as these noisy commits will become part of the permanent history when you ask Linus to pull from the release branch. @@ -2228,7 +2229,7 @@ patches), and create a new branch from a recent stable tag of Linus's branch. Picking a stable base for your branch will: 1) help you: by avoiding inclusion of unrelated and perhaps lightly tested changes -2) help future bug hunters that use "git bisect" to find problems +2) help future bug hunters that use `git bisect` to find problems ------------------------------------------------- $ git checkout -b speed-up-spinlocks v2.6.35 @@ -2253,9 +2254,9 @@ It is unlikely that you would have any conflicts here ... but you might if you spent a while on this step and had also pulled new versions from upstream. Some time later when enough time has passed and testing done, you can pull the -same branch into the "release" tree ready to go upstream. This is where you +same branch into the `release` tree ready to go upstream. This is where you see the value of keeping each patch (or patch series) in its own branch. It -means that the patches can be moved into the "release" tree in any order. +means that the patches can be moved into the `release` tree in any order. ------------------------------------------------- $ git checkout release && git pull . speed-up-spinlocks @@ -2288,7 +2289,7 @@ If it has been merged, then there will be no output.) Once a patch completes the great cycle (moving from test to release, then pulled by Linus, and finally coming back into your local -"origin/master" branch), the branch for this change is no longer needed. +`origin/master` branch), the branch for this change is no longer needed. You detect this when the output from: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -2303,8 +2304,8 @@ $ git branch -d branchname Some changes are so trivial that it is not necessary to create a separate branch and then merge into each of the test and release branches. For -these changes, just apply directly to the "release" branch, and then -merge that into the "test" branch. +these changes, just apply directly to the `release` branch, and then +merge that into the `test` branch. After pushing your work to `mytree`, you can use linkgit:git-request-pull[1] to prepare a "please pull" request message @@ -2319,7 +2320,7 @@ Here are some of the scripts that simplify all this even further. ------------------------------------------------- ==== update script ==== -# Update a branch in my GIT tree. If the branch to be updated +# Update a branch in my Git tree. If the branch to be updated # is origin, then pull from kernel.org. Otherwise merge # origin/master branch into test|release branch @@ -2377,7 +2378,7 @@ esac ------------------------------------------------- ==== status script ==== -# report on status of my ia64 GIT tree +# report on status of my ia64 Git tree gb=$(tput setab 2) rb=$(tput setab 1) @@ -2433,7 +2434,7 @@ Rewriting history and maintaining patch series Normally commits are only added to a project, never taken away or replaced. Git is designed with this assumption, and violating it will -cause git's merge machinery (for example) to do the wrong thing. +cause Git's merge machinery (for example) to do the wrong thing. However, there is a situation in which it can be useful to violate this assumption. @@ -2475,8 +2476,8 @@ you are rewriting history. Keeping a patch series up to date using git rebase -------------------------------------------------- -Suppose that you create a branch "mywork" on a remote-tracking branch -"origin", and create some commits on top of it: +Suppose that you create a branch `mywork` on a remote-tracking branch +`origin`, and create some commits on top of it: ------------------------------------------------- $ git checkout -b mywork origin @@ -2488,7 +2489,7 @@ $ git commit ------------------------------------------------- You have performed no merges into mywork, so it is just a simple linear -sequence of patches on top of "origin": +sequence of patches on top of `origin`: ................................................ o--o--O <-- origin @@ -2497,7 +2498,7 @@ sequence of patches on top of "origin": ................................................ Some more interesting work has been done in the upstream project, and -"origin" has advanced: +`origin` has advanced: ................................................ o--o--O--o--o--o <-- origin @@ -2505,7 +2506,7 @@ Some more interesting work has been done in the upstream project, and a--b--c <-- mywork ................................................ -At this point, you could use "pull" to merge your changes back in; +At this point, you could use `pull` to merge your changes back in; the result would create a new merge commit, like this: ................................................ @@ -2524,7 +2525,7 @@ $ git rebase origin ------------------------------------------------- This will remove each of your commits from mywork, temporarily saving -them as patches (in a directory named ".git/rebase-apply"), update mywork to +them as patches (in a directory named `.git/rebase-apply`), update mywork to point at the latest version of origin, then apply each of the saved patches to the new mywork. The result will look like: @@ -2544,7 +2545,7 @@ running `git commit`, just run $ git rebase --continue ------------------------------------------------- -and git will continue applying the rest of the patches. +and Git will continue applying the rest of the patches. At any point you may use the `--abort` option to abort this process and return mywork to the state it had before you started the rebase: @@ -2701,7 +2702,7 @@ Git has no way of knowing that the new head is an updated version of the old head; it treats this situation exactly the same as it would if two developers had independently done the work on the old and new heads in parallel. At this point, if someone attempts to merge the new head -in to their branch, git will attempt to merge together the two (old and +in to their branch, Git will attempt to merge together the two (old and new) lines of development, instead of trying to replace the old by the new. The results are likely to be unexpected. @@ -2774,7 +2775,7 @@ linear history: Bisecting between Z and D* would hit a single culprit commit Y*, and understanding why Y* was broken would probably be easier. -Partly for this reason, many experienced git users, even when +Partly for this reason, many experienced Git users, even when working on an otherwise merge-heavy project, keep the history linear by rebasing against the latest upstream version before publishing. @@ -2795,10 +2796,10 @@ arbitrary name: $ git fetch origin todo:my-todo-work ------------------------------------------------- -The first argument, "origin", just tells git to fetch from the -repository you originally cloned from. The second argument tells git -to fetch the branch named "todo" from the remote repository, and to -store it locally under the name refs/heads/my-todo-work. +The first argument, `origin`, just tells Git to fetch from the +repository you originally cloned from. The second argument tells Git +to fetch the branch named `todo` from the remote repository, and to +store it locally under the name `refs/heads/my-todo-work`. You can also fetch branches from other repositories; so @@ -2806,8 +2807,8 @@ You can also fetch branches from other repositories; so $ git fetch git://example.com/proj.git master:example-master ------------------------------------------------- -will create a new branch named "example-master" and store in it the -branch named "master" from the repository at the given URL. If you +will create a new branch named `example-master` and store in it the +branch named `master` from the repository at the given URL. If you already have a branch named example-master, it will attempt to <<fast-forwards,fast-forward>> to the commit given by example.com's master branch. In more detail: @@ -2816,7 +2817,7 @@ master branch. In more detail: git fetch and fast-forwards --------------------------- -In the previous example, when updating an existing branch, "git fetch" +In the previous example, when updating an existing branch, `git fetch` checks to make sure that the most recent commit on the remote branch is a descendant of the most recent commit on your copy of the branch before updating your copy of the branch to point at the new @@ -2842,11 +2843,11 @@ resulting in a situation like: o--o--o <-- new head of the branch ................................................ -In this case, "git fetch" will fail, and print out a warning. +In this case, `git fetch` will fail, and print out a warning. -In that case, you can still force git to update to the new head, as +In that case, you can still force Git to update to the new head, as described in the following section. However, note that in the -situation above this may mean losing the commits labeled "a" and "b", +situation above this may mean losing the commits labeled `a` and `b`, unless you've already created a reference of your own pointing to them. @@ -2861,7 +2862,7 @@ descendant of the old head, you may force the update with: $ git fetch git://example.com/proj.git +master:refs/remotes/example/master ------------------------------------------------- -Note the addition of the "+" sign. Alternatively, you can use the "-f" +Note the addition of the `+` sign. Alternatively, you can use the `-f` flag to force updates of all the fetched branches, as in: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -2875,9 +2876,9 @@ may be lost, as we saw in the previous section. Configuring remote-tracking branches ------------------------------------ -We saw above that "origin" is just a shortcut to refer to the +We saw above that `origin` is just a shortcut to refer to the repository that you originally cloned from. This information is -stored in git configuration variables, which you can see using +stored in Git configuration variables, which you can see using linkgit:git-config[1]: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -2929,7 +2930,7 @@ Git concepts Git is built on a small number of simple but powerful ideas. While it is possible to get things done without understanding them, you will find -git much more intuitive if you do. +Git much more intuitive if you do. We start with the most important, the <<def_object_database,object database>> and the <<def_index,index>>. @@ -2984,7 +2985,7 @@ Commit Object ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The "commit" object links a physical state of a tree with a description -of how we got there and why. Use the --pretty=raw option to +of how we got there and why. Use the `--pretty=raw` option to linkgit:git-show[1] or linkgit:git-log[1] to examine your favorite commit: @@ -3023,10 +3024,10 @@ As you can see, a commit is defined by: Note that a commit does not itself contain any information about what actually changed; all changes are calculated by comparing the contents of the tree referred to by this commit with the trees associated with -its parents. In particular, git does not attempt to record file renames +its parents. In particular, Git does not attempt to record file renames explicitly, though it can identify cases where the existence of the same file data at changing paths suggests a rename. (See, for example, the --M option to linkgit:git-diff[1]). +`-M` option to linkgit:git-diff[1]). A commit is usually created by linkgit:git-commit[1], which creates a commit whose parent is normally the current HEAD, and whose tree is @@ -3062,14 +3063,14 @@ another tree, representing the contents of a subdirectory. Since trees and blobs, like all other objects, are named by the SHA-1 hash of their contents, two trees have the same SHA-1 name if and only if their contents (including, recursively, the contents of all subdirectories) -are identical. This allows git to quickly determine the differences +are identical. This allows Git to quickly determine the differences between two related tree objects, since it can ignore any entries with identical object names. (Note: in the presence of submodules, trees may also have commits as entries. See <<submodules>> for documentation.) -Note that the files all have mode 644 or 755: git actually only pays +Note that the files all have mode 644 or 755: Git actually only pays attention to the executable bit. [[blob-object]] @@ -3077,7 +3078,7 @@ Blob Object ~~~~~~~~~~~ You can use linkgit:git-show[1] to examine the contents of a blob; take, -for example, the blob in the entry for "COPYING" from the tree above: +for example, the blob in the entry for `COPYING` from the tree above: ------------------------------------------------ $ git show 6ff87c4664 @@ -3130,7 +3131,7 @@ sending out a single email that tells the people the name (SHA-1 hash) of the top commit, and digitally sign that email using something like GPG/PGP. -To assist in this, git also provides the tag object... +To assist in this, Git also provides the tag object... [[tag-object]] Tag Object @@ -3160,14 +3161,14 @@ nLE/L9aUXdWeTFPron96DLA= See the linkgit:git-tag[1] command to learn how to create and verify tag objects. (Note that linkgit:git-tag[1] can also be used to create "lightweight tags", which are not tag objects at all, but just simple -references whose names begin with "refs/tags/"). +references whose names begin with `refs/tags/`). [[pack-files]] -How git stores objects efficiently: pack files +How Git stores objects efficiently: pack files ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Newly created objects are initially created in a file named after the -object's SHA-1 hash (stored in .git/objects). +object's SHA-1 hash (stored in `.git/objects`). Unfortunately this system becomes inefficient once a project has a lot of objects. Try this on an old project: @@ -3181,7 +3182,7 @@ The first number is the number of objects which are kept in individual files. The second is the amount of space taken up by those "loose" objects. -You can save space and make git faster by moving these loose objects in +You can save space and make Git faster by moving these loose objects in to a "pack file", which stores a group of objects in an efficient compressed format; the details of how pack files are formatted can be found in link:technical/pack-format.txt[technical/pack-format.txt]. @@ -3208,9 +3209,9 @@ $ git prune to remove any of the "loose" objects that are now contained in the pack. This will also remove any unreferenced objects (which may be -created when, for example, you use "git reset" to remove a commit). +created when, for example, you use `git reset` to remove a commit). You can verify that the loose objects are gone by looking at the -.git/objects directory or by running +`.git/objects` directory or by running ------------------------------------------------ $ git count-objects @@ -3237,7 +3238,7 @@ branch still exists, as does everything it pointed to. The branch pointer itself just doesn't, since you replaced it with another one. There are also other situations that cause dangling objects. For -example, a "dangling blob" may arise because you did a "git add" of a +example, a "dangling blob" may arise because you did a `git add` of a file, but then, before you actually committed it and made it part of the bigger picture, you changed something else in that file and committed that *updated* thing--the old state that you added originally ends up @@ -3280,14 +3281,14 @@ $ git show <dangling-blob/tree-sha-goes-here> ------------------------------------------------ to show what the contents of the blob were (or, for a tree, basically -what the "ls" for that directory was), and that may give you some idea +what the `ls` for that directory was), and that may give you some idea of what the operation was that left that dangling object. Usually, dangling blobs and trees aren't very interesting. They're almost always the result of either being a half-way mergebase (the blob will often even have the conflict markers from a merge in it, if you have had conflicting merges that you fixed up by hand), or simply -because you interrupted a "git fetch" with ^C or something like that, +because you interrupted a `git fetch` with ^C or something like that, leaving _some_ of the new objects in the object database, but just dangling and useless. @@ -3298,28 +3299,28 @@ state, you can just prune all unreachable objects: $ git prune ------------------------------------------------ -and they'll be gone. But you should only run "git prune" on a quiescent +and they'll be gone. But you should only run `git prune` on a quiescent repository--it's kind of like doing a filesystem fsck recovery: you don't want to do that while the filesystem is mounted. -(The same is true of "git fsck" itself, btw, but since +(The same is true of `git fsck` itself, btw, but since `git fsck` never actually *changes* the repository, it just reports on what it found, `git fsck` itself is never 'dangerous' to run. Running it while somebody is actually changing the repository can cause confusing and scary messages, but it won't actually do anything bad. In -contrast, running "git prune" while somebody is actively changing the +contrast, running `git prune` while somebody is actively changing the repository is a *BAD* idea). [[recovering-from-repository-corruption]] Recovering from repository corruption ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -By design, git treats data trusted to it with caution. However, even in -the absence of bugs in git itself, it is still possible that hardware or +By design, Git treats data trusted to it with caution. However, even in +the absence of bugs in Git itself, it is still possible that hardware or operating system errors could corrupt data. The first defense against such problems is backups. You can back up a -git directory using clone, or just using cp, tar, or any other backup +Git directory using clone, or just using cp, tar, or any other backup mechanism. As a last resort, you can search for the corrupted objects and attempt @@ -3345,7 +3346,7 @@ missing blob 4b9458b3786228369c63936db65827de3cc06200 Now you know that blob 4b9458b3 is missing, and that the tree 2d9263c6 points to it. If you could find just one copy of that missing blob object, possibly in some other repository, you could move it into -.git/objects/4b/9458b3... and be done. Suppose you can't. You can +`.git/objects/4b/9458b3...` and be done. Suppose you can't. You can still examine the tree that pointed to it with linkgit:git-ls-tree[1], which might output something like: @@ -3360,10 +3361,10 @@ $ git ls-tree 2d9263c6d23595e7cb2a21e5ebbb53655278dff8 ------------------------------------------------ So now you know that the missing blob was the data for a file named -"myfile". And chances are you can also identify the directory--let's -say it's in "somedirectory". If you're lucky the missing copy might be +`myfile`. And chances are you can also identify the directory--let's +say it's in `somedirectory`. If you're lucky the missing copy might be the same as the copy you have checked out in your working tree at -"somedirectory/myfile"; you can test whether that's right with +`somedirectory/myfile`; you can test whether that's right with linkgit:git-hash-object[1]: ------------------------------------------------ @@ -3418,7 +3419,7 @@ $ git hash-object -w <recreated-file> and your repository is good again! -(Btw, you could have ignored the fsck, and started with doing a +(Btw, you could have ignored the `fsck`, and started with doing a ------------------------------------------------ $ git log --raw --all @@ -3432,7 +3433,7 @@ just missing one particular blob version. The index ----------- -The index is a binary file (generally kept in .git/index) containing a +The index is a binary file (generally kept in `.git/index`) containing a sorted list of path names, each with permissions and the SHA-1 of a blob object; linkgit:git-ls-files[1] can show you the contents of the index: @@ -3467,7 +3468,7 @@ It does this by storing some additional data for each entry (such as the last modified time). This data is not displayed above, and is not stored in the created tree object, but it can be used to determine quickly which files in the working directory differ from what was -stored in the index, and thus save git from having to read all of the +stored in the index, and thus save Git from having to read all of the data from such files to look for changes. 3. It can efficiently represent information about merge conflicts @@ -3572,7 +3573,7 @@ $ ls -a The `git submodule add <repo> <path>` command does a couple of things: -- It clones the submodule from <repo> to the given <path> under the +- It clones the submodule from `<repo>` to the given `<path>` under the current directory and by default checks out the master branch. - It adds the submodule's clone path to the linkgit:gitmodules[5] file and adds this file to the index, ready to be committed. @@ -3698,13 +3699,13 @@ Did you forget to 'git add'? Unable to checkout '261dfac35cb99d380eb966e102c1197139f7fa24' in submodule path 'a' ------------------------------------------------- -In older git versions it could be easily forgotten to commit new or modified +In older Git versions it could be easily forgotten to commit new or modified files in a submodule, which silently leads to similar problems as not pushing -the submodule changes. Starting with git 1.7.0 both "git status" and "git diff" +the submodule changes. Starting with Git 1.7.0 both `git status` and `git diff` in the superproject show submodules as modified when they contain new or -modified files to protect against accidentally committing such a state. "git -diff" will also add a "-dirty" to the work tree side when generating patch -output or used with the --submodule option: +modified files to protect against accidentally committing such a state. `git +diff` will also add a `-dirty` to the work tree side when generating patch +output or used with the `--submodule` option: ------------------------------------------------- $ git diff @@ -3745,12 +3746,12 @@ submodule update` will not overwrite them. Instead, you get the usual warning about not being able switch from a dirty branch. [[low-level-operations]] -Low-level git operations +Low-level Git operations ======================== Many of the higher-level commands were originally implemented as shell -scripts using a smaller core of low-level git commands. These can still -be useful when doing unusual things with git, or just as a way to +scripts using a smaller core of low-level Git commands. These can still +be useful when doing unusual things with Git, or just as a way to understand its inner workings. [[object-manipulation]] @@ -3781,7 +3782,7 @@ between the working tree, the index, and the object database. Git provides low-level operations which perform each of these steps individually. -Generally, all "git" operations work on the index file. Some operations +Generally, all Git operations work on the index file. Some operations work *purely* on the index file (showing the current state of the index), but most operations move data between the index file and either the database or the working directory. Thus there are four main @@ -3804,7 +3805,7 @@ but to avoid common mistakes with filename globbing etc, the command will not normally add totally new entries or remove old entries, i.e. it will normally just update existing cache entries. -To tell git that yes, you really do realize that certain files no +To tell Git that yes, you really do realize that certain files no longer exist, or that new files should be added, you should use the `--remove` and `--add` flags respectively. @@ -3880,7 +3881,7 @@ or, if you want to check out all of the index, use `-a`. NOTE! `git checkout-index` normally refuses to overwrite old files, so if you have an old version of the tree already checked out, you will -need to use the "-f" flag ('before' the "-a" flag or the filename) to +need to use the `-f` flag ('before' the `-a` flag or the filename) to 'force' the checkout. @@ -3891,7 +3892,7 @@ from one representation to the other: Tying it all together ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -To commit a tree you have instantiated with "git write-tree", you'd +To commit a tree you have instantiated with `git write-tree`, you'd create a "commit" object that refers to that tree and the history behind it--most notably the "parent" commits that preceded it in history. @@ -3918,7 +3919,7 @@ redirection from a pipe or file, or by just typing it at the tty). `git commit-tree` will return the name of the object that represents that commit, and you should save it away for later use. Normally, -you'd commit a new `HEAD` state, and while git doesn't care where you +you'd commit a new `HEAD` state, and while Git doesn't care where you save the note about that state, in practice we tend to just write the result to the file pointed at by `.git/HEAD`, so that we can always see what the last committed state was. @@ -4075,7 +4076,7 @@ $ git ls-files --unmerged Each line of the `git ls-files --unmerged` output begins with the blob mode bits, blob SHA-1, 'stage number', and the -filename. The 'stage number' is git's way to say which tree it +filename. The 'stage number' is Git's way to say which tree it came from: stage 1 corresponds to the `$orig` tree, stage 2 to the `HEAD` tree, and stage 3 to the `$target` tree. @@ -4087,7 +4088,7 @@ obviously the final outcome is what is in `HEAD`. What the above example shows is that file `hello.c` was changed from `$orig` to `HEAD` and `$orig` to `$target` in a different way. You could resolve this by running your favorite 3-way merge -program, e.g. `diff3`, `merge`, or git's own merge-file, on +program, e.g. `diff3`, `merge`, or Git's own merge-file, on the blob objects from these three stages yourself, like this: ------------------------------------------------ @@ -4099,7 +4100,7 @@ $ git merge-file hello.c~2 hello.c~1 hello.c~3 This would leave the merge result in `hello.c~2` file, along with conflict markers if there are conflicts. After verifying -the merge result makes sense, you can tell git what the final +the merge result makes sense, you can tell Git what the final merge result for this file is by: ------------------------------------------------- @@ -4108,11 +4109,11 @@ $ git update-index hello.c ------------------------------------------------- When a path is in the "unmerged" state, running `git update-index` for -that path tells git to mark the path resolved. +that path tells Git to mark the path resolved. -The above is the description of a git merge at the lowest level, +The above is the description of a Git merge at the lowest level, to help you understand what conceptually happens under the hood. -In practice, nobody, not even git itself, runs `git cat-file` three times +In practice, nobody, not even Git itself, runs `git cat-file` three times for this. There is a `git merge-index` program that extracts the stages to temporary files and calls a "merge" script on it: @@ -4123,11 +4124,11 @@ $ git merge-index git-merge-one-file hello.c and that is what higher level `git merge -s resolve` is implemented with. [[hacking-git]] -Hacking git +Hacking Git =========== -This chapter covers internal details of the git implementation which -probably only git developers need to understand. +This chapter covers internal details of the Git implementation which +probably only Git developers need to understand. [[object-details]] Object storage format @@ -4145,15 +4146,16 @@ about the data in the object. It's worth noting that the SHA-1 hash that is used to name the object is the hash of the original data plus this header, so `sha1sum` 'file' does not match the object name for 'file'. -(Historical note: in the dawn of the age of git the hash +(Historical note: in the dawn of the age of Git the hash was the SHA-1 of the 'compressed' object.) As a result, the general consistency of an object can always be tested independently of the contents or the type of the object: all objects can be validated by verifying that (a) their hashes match the content of the file and (b) the object successfully inflates to a stream of bytes that -forms a sequence of <ascii type without space> {plus} <space> {plus} <ascii decimal -size> {plus} <byte\0> {plus} <binary object data>. +forms a sequence of +`<ascii type without space> + <space> + <ascii decimal size> + +<byte\0> + <binary object data>`. The structured objects can further have their structure and connectivity to other objects verified. This is generally done with @@ -4175,7 +4177,7 @@ A good place to start is with the contents of the initial commit, with: $ git checkout e83c5163 ---------------------------------------------------- -The initial revision lays the foundation for almost everything git has +The initial revision lays the foundation for almost everything Git has today, but is small enough to read in one sitting. Note that terminology has changed since that revision. For example, the @@ -4329,7 +4331,7 @@ Now, for the meat: This is how you read a blob (actually, not only a blob, but any type of object). To know how the function `read_object_with_reference()` actually works, find the source code for it (something like `git grep -read_object_with | grep ":[a-z]"` in the git repository), and read +read_object_with | grep ":[a-z]"` in the Git repository), and read the source. To find out how the result can be used, just read on in `cmd_cat_file()`: @@ -4510,7 +4512,7 @@ $ git bisect bad # if this revision is bad. Making changes -------------- -Make sure git knows who to blame: +Make sure Git knows who to blame: ------------------------------------------------ $ cat >>~/.gitconfig <<\EOF @@ -4560,7 +4562,7 @@ $ git format-patch origin..HEAD # format a patch for each commit $ git am mbox # import patches from the mailbox "mbox" ----------------------------------------------- -Fetch a branch in a different git repository, then merge into the +Fetch a branch in a different Git repository, then merge into the current branch: ----------------------------------------------- @@ -4621,7 +4623,7 @@ The basic requirements: - It must be readable in order, from beginning to end, by someone intelligent with a basic grasp of the UNIX command line, but without - any special knowledge of git. If necessary, any other prerequisites + any special knowledge of Git. If necessary, any other prerequisites should be specifically mentioned as they arise. - Whenever possible, section headings should clearly describe the task they explain how to do, in language that requires no more knowledge @@ -4632,10 +4634,10 @@ Think about how to create a clear chapter dependency graph that will allow people to get to important topics without necessarily reading everything in between. -Scan Documentation/ for other stuff left out; in particular: +Scan `Documentation/` for other stuff left out; in particular: - howto's -- some of technical/? +- some of `technical/`? - hooks - list of commands in linkgit:git[1] |