summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/tutorial.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/tutorial.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/tutorial.txt584
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 584 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/tutorial.txt b/Documentation/tutorial.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 129c5c5f5b..0000000000
--- a/Documentation/tutorial.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,584 +0,0 @@
-A tutorial introduction to git
-==============================
-
-This tutorial explains how to import a new project into git, make
-changes to it, and share changes with other developers.
-
-First, note that you can get documentation for a command such as "git
-diff" with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ man git-diff
-------------------------------------------------
-
-It is a good idea to introduce yourself to git with your name and
-public email address before doing any operation. The easiest
-way to do so is:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git config --global user.name "Your Name Comes Here"
-$ git config --global user.email you@yourdomain.example.com
-------------------------------------------------
-
-
-Importing a new project
------------------------
-
-Assume you have a tarball project.tar.gz with your initial work. You
-can place it under git revision control as follows.
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ tar xzf project.tar.gz
-$ cd project
-$ git init
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Git will reply
-
-------------------------------------------------
-Initialized empty Git repository in .git/
-------------------------------------------------
-
-You've now initialized the working directory--you may notice a new
-directory created, named ".git". Tell git that you want it to track
-every file under the current directory (note the '.') with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git add .
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Finally,
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will prompt you for a commit message, then record the current state
-of all the files to the repository.
-
-Making changes
---------------
-
-Try modifying some files, then run
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git diff
-------------------------------------------------
-
-to review your changes. When you're done, tell git that you
-want the updated contents of these files in the commit and then
-make a commit, like this:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git add file1 file2 file3
-$ git commit
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This will again prompt your for a message describing the change, and then
-record the new versions of the files you listed.
-
-Alternatively, instead of running `git add` beforehand, you can use
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit -a
-------------------------------------------------
-
-which will automatically notice modified (but not new) files.
-
-A note on commit messages: Though not required, it's a good idea to
-begin the commit message with a single short (less than 50 character)
-line summarizing the change, followed by a blank line and then a more
-thorough description. Tools that turn commits into email, for
-example, use the first line on the Subject: line and the rest of the
-commit in the body.
-
-
-Git tracks content not files
-----------------------------
-
-With git you have to explicitly "add" all the changed _content_ you
-want to commit together. This can be done in a few different ways:
-
-1) By using 'git add <file_spec>...'
-
-This can be performed multiple times before a commit. Note that this
-is not only for adding new files. Even modified files must be
-added to the set of changes about to be committed. The "git status"
-command gives you a summary of what is included so far for the
-next commit. When done you should use the 'git commit' command to
-make it real.
-
-Note: don't forget to 'add' a file again if you modified it after the
-first 'add' and before 'commit'. Otherwise only the previous added
-state of that file will be committed. This is because git tracks
-content, so what you're really 'add'ing to the commit is the *content*
-of the file in the state it is in when you 'add' it.
-
-2) By using 'git commit -a' directly
-
-This is a quick way to automatically 'add' the content from all files
-that were modified since the previous commit, and perform the actual
-commit without having to separately 'add' them beforehand. This will
-not add content from new files i.e. files that were never added before.
-Those files still have to be added explicitly before performing a
-commit.
-
-But here's a twist. If you do 'git commit <file1> <file2> ...' then only
-the changes belonging to those explicitly specified files will be
-committed, entirely bypassing the current "added" changes. Those "added"
-changes will still remain available for a subsequent commit though.
-
-However, for normal usage you only have to remember 'git add' + 'git commit'
-and/or 'git commit -a'.
-
-
-Viewing the changelog
----------------------
-
-At any point you can view the history of your changes using
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git log
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If you also want to see complete diffs at each step, use
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git log -p
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Often the overview of the change is useful to get a feel of
-each step
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git log --stat --summary
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Managing branches
------------------
-
-A single git repository can maintain multiple branches of
-development. To create a new branch named "experimental", use
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If you now run
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch
-------------------------------------------------
-
-you'll get a list of all existing branches:
-
-------------------------------------------------
- experimental
-* master
-------------------------------------------------
-
-The "experimental" branch is the one you just created, and the
-"master" branch is a default branch that was created for you
-automatically. The asterisk marks the branch you are currently on;
-type
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git checkout experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-to switch to the experimental branch. Now edit a file, commit the
-change, and switch back to the master branch:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-(edit file)
-$ git commit -a
-$ git checkout master
-------------------------------------------------
-
-Check that the change you made is no longer visible, since it was
-made on the experimental branch and you're back on the master branch.
-
-You can make a different change on the master branch:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-(edit file)
-$ git commit -a
-------------------------------------------------
-
-at this point the two branches have diverged, with different changes
-made in each. To merge the changes made in experimental into master, run
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git merge experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-If the changes don't conflict, you're done. If there are conflicts,
-markers will be left in the problematic files showing the conflict;
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git diff
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will show this. Once you've edited the files to resolve the
-conflicts,
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git commit -a
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will commit the result of the merge. Finally,
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ gitk
-------------------------------------------------
-
-will show a nice graphical representation of the resulting history.
-
-At this point you could delete the experimental branch with
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git branch -d experimental
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This command ensures that the changes in the experimental branch are
-already in the current branch.
-
-If you develop on a branch crazy-idea, then regret it, you can always
-delete the branch with
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git branch -D crazy-idea
--------------------------------------
-
-Branches are cheap and easy, so this is a good way to try something
-out.
-
-Using git for collaboration
----------------------------
-
-Suppose that Alice has started a new project with a git repository in
-/home/alice/project, and that Bob, who has a home directory on the
-same machine, wants to contribute.
-
-Bob begins with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git clone /home/alice/project myrepo
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This creates a new directory "myrepo" containing a clone of Alice's
-repository. The clone is on an equal footing with the original
-project, possessing its own copy of the original project's history.
-
-Bob then makes some changes and commits them:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-(edit files)
-$ git commit -a
-(repeat as necessary)
-------------------------------------------------
-
-When he's ready, he tells Alice to pull changes from the repository
-at /home/bob/myrepo. She does this with:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ cd /home/alice/project
-$ git pull /home/bob/myrepo master
-------------------------------------------------
-
-This merges the changes from Bob's "master" branch into Alice's
-current branch. If Alice has made her own changes in the meantime,
-then she may need to manually fix any conflicts. (Note that the
-"master" argument in the above command is actually unnecessary, as it
-is the default.)
-
-The "pull" command thus performs two operations: it fetches changes
-from a remote branch, then merges them into the current branch.
-
-When you are working in a small closely knit group, it is not
-unusual to interact with the same repository over and over
-again. By defining 'remote' repository shorthand, you can make
-it easier:
-
-------------------------------------------------
-$ git remote add bob /home/bob/myrepo
-------------------------------------------------
-
-With this, you can perform the first operation alone using the
-"git fetch" command without merging them with her own branch,
-using:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git fetch bob
--------------------------------------
-
-Unlike the longhand form, when Alice fetches from Bob using a
-remote repository shorthand set up with `git remote`, what was
-fetched is stored in a remote tracking branch, in this case
-`bob/master`. So after this:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log -p master..bob/master
--------------------------------------
-
-shows a list of all the changes that Bob made since he branched from
-Alice's master branch.
-
-After examining those changes, Alice
-could merge the changes into her master branch:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git merge bob/master
--------------------------------------
-
-This `merge` can also be done by 'pulling from her own remote
-tracking branch', like this:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git pull . remotes/bob/master
--------------------------------------
-
-Note that git pull always merges into the current branch,
-regardless of what else is given on the commandline.
-
-Later, Bob can update his repo with Alice's latest changes using
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git pull
--------------------------------------
-
-Note that he doesn't need to give the path to Alice's repository;
-when Bob cloned Alice's repository, git stored the location of her
-repository in the repository configuration, and that location is
-used for pulls:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git config --get remote.origin.url
-/home/bob/myrepo
--------------------------------------
-
-(The complete configuration created by git-clone is visible using
-"git config -l", and the gitlink:git-config[1] man page
-explains the meaning of each option.)
-
-Git also keeps a pristine copy of Alice's master branch under the
-name "origin/master":
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git branch -r
- origin/master
--------------------------------------
-
-If Bob later decides to work from a different host, he can still
-perform clones and pulls using the ssh protocol:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git clone alice.org:/home/alice/project myrepo
--------------------------------------
-
-Alternatively, git has a native protocol, or can use rsync or http;
-see gitlink:git-pull[1] for details.
-
-Git can also be used in a CVS-like mode, with a central repository
-that various users push changes to; see gitlink:git-push[1] and
-link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].
-
-Exploring history
------------------
-
-Git history is represented as a series of interrelated commits. We
-have already seen that the git log command can list those commits.
-Note that first line of each git log entry also gives a name for the
-commit:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log
-commit c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
-Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
-Date: Tue May 16 17:18:22 2006 -0700
-
- merge-base: Clarify the comments on post processing.
--------------------------------------
-
-We can give this name to git show to see the details about this
-commit.
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show c82a22c39cbc32576f64f5c6b3f24b99ea8149c7
--------------------------------------
-
-But there are other ways to refer to commits. You can use any initial
-part of the name that is long enough to uniquely identify the commit:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show c82a22c39c # the first few characters of the name are
- # usually enough
-$ git show HEAD # the tip of the current branch
-$ git show experimental # the tip of the "experimental" branch
--------------------------------------
-
-Every commit usually has one "parent" commit
-which points to the previous state of the project:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show HEAD^ # to see the parent of HEAD
-$ git show HEAD^^ # to see the grandparent of HEAD
-$ git show HEAD~4 # to see the great-great grandparent of HEAD
--------------------------------------
-
-Note that merge commits may have more than one parent:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show HEAD^1 # show the first parent of HEAD (same as HEAD^)
-$ git show HEAD^2 # show the second parent of HEAD
--------------------------------------
-
-You can also give commits names of your own; after running
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git-tag v2.5 1b2e1d63ff
--------------------------------------
-
-you can refer to 1b2e1d63ff by the name "v2.5". If you intend to
-share this name with other people (for example, to identify a release
-version), you should create a "tag" object, and perhaps sign it; see
-gitlink:git-tag[1] for details.
-
-Any git command that needs to know a commit can take any of these
-names. For example:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git diff v2.5 HEAD # compare the current HEAD to v2.5
-$ git branch stable v2.5 # start a new branch named "stable" based
- # at v2.5
-$ git reset --hard HEAD^ # reset your current branch and working
- # directory to its state at HEAD^
--------------------------------------
-
-Be careful with that last command: in addition to losing any changes
-in the working directory, it will also remove all later commits from
-this branch. If this branch is the only branch containing those
-commits, they will be lost. Also, don't use "git reset" on a
-publicly-visible branch that other developers pull from, as it will
-force needless merges on other developers to clean up the history.
-If you need to undo changes that you have pushed, use gitlink:git-revert[1]
-instead.
-
-The git grep command can search for strings in any version of your
-project, so
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git grep "hello" v2.5
--------------------------------------
-
-searches for all occurrences of "hello" in v2.5.
-
-If you leave out the commit name, git grep will search any of the
-files it manages in your current directory. So
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git grep "hello"
--------------------------------------
-
-is a quick way to search just the files that are tracked by git.
-
-Many git commands also take sets of commits, which can be specified
-in a number of ways. Here are some examples with git log:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log v2.5..v2.6 # commits between v2.5 and v2.6
-$ git log v2.5.. # commits since v2.5
-$ git log --since="2 weeks ago" # commits from the last 2 weeks
-$ git log v2.5.. Makefile # commits since v2.5 which modify
- # Makefile
--------------------------------------
-
-You can also give git log a "range" of commits where the first is not
-necessarily an ancestor of the second; for example, if the tips of
-the branches "stable-release" and "master" diverged from a common
-commit some time ago, then
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log stable..experimental
--------------------------------------
-
-will list commits made in the experimental branch but not in the
-stable branch, while
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git log experimental..stable
--------------------------------------
-
-will show the list of commits made on the stable branch but not
-the experimental branch.
-
-The "git log" command has a weakness: it must present commits in a
-list. When the history has lines of development that diverged and
-then merged back together, the order in which "git log" presents
-those commits is meaningless.
-
-Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the linux kernel,
-or git itself) have frequent merges, and gitk does a better job of
-visualizing their history. For example,
-
--------------------------------------
-$ gitk --since="2 weeks ago" drivers/
--------------------------------------
-
-allows you to browse any commits from the last 2 weeks of commits
-that modified files under the "drivers" directory. (Note: you can
-adjust gitk's fonts by holding down the control key while pressing
-"-" or "+".)
-
-Finally, most commands that take filenames will optionally allow you
-to precede any filename by a commit, to specify a particular version
-of the file:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git diff v2.5:Makefile HEAD:Makefile.in
--------------------------------------
-
-You can also use "git show" to see any such file:
-
--------------------------------------
-$ git show v2.5:Makefile
--------------------------------------
-
-Next Steps
-----------
-
-This tutorial should be enough to perform basic distributed revision
-control for your projects. However, to fully understand the depth
-and power of git you need to understand two simple ideas on which it
-is based:
-
- * The object database is the rather elegant system used to
- store the history of your project--files, directories, and
- commits.
-
- * The index file is a cache of the state of a directory tree,
- used to create commits, check out working directories, and
- hold the various trees involved in a merge.
-
-link:tutorial-2.html[Part two of this tutorial] explains the object
-database, the index file, and a few other odds and ends that you'll
-need to make the most of git.
-
-If you don't want to consider with that right away, a few other
-digressions that may be interesting at this point are:
-
- * gitlink:git-format-patch[1], gitlink:git-am[1]: These convert
- series of git commits into emailed patches, and vice versa,
- useful for projects such as the linux kernel which rely heavily
- on emailed patches.
-
- * gitlink:git-bisect[1]: When there is a regression in your
- project, one way to track down the bug is by searching through
- the history to find the exact commit that's to blame. Git bisect
- can help you perform a binary search for that commit. It is
- smart enough to perform a close-to-optimal search even in the
- case of complex non-linear history with lots of merged branches.
-
- * link:everyday.html[Everyday GIT with 20 Commands Or So]
-
- * link:cvs-migration.html[git for CVS users].